CyberArk & Ansible - AIM Bi-Directional Integration

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @infamousjoeg
    @infamousjoeg  6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best part of this video is when I'm so confident it'll start chugging away "any second now" and it's a minute later that it actually does! X-D

  • @poojagangwar9338
    @poojagangwar9338 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video !! Huge Respect.

  • @JeffZiegler76
    @JeffZiegler76 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are there any NuGet packages to make accessing CyberArk easier? I am using C#/.Net.

    • @infamousjoeg
      @infamousjoeg  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not sure what you specifically want to do, but from a developer's perspective, you'll probably be more concerned with retrieving passwords instead of onboarding or managing them. For .NET developers, we provide a DLL that provides classes you can easily implement in code to securely retrieve your secrets using attributes for authentication instead of a secret. Otherwise, we provide the same solution where retrieval can be the same over a REST API or we can slide right into a middleware server such as WebSphere, WebLogic, TomCat, and JBoss and not need any code changes at all in your JVM apps.

  • @amarjeetkumar8598
    @amarjeetkumar8598 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Joe for this video.. May I request you to make video on to manage auto logon windows registry password management with CPM in cyberark.

  • @chrisnavarro5122
    @chrisnavarro5122 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Joe, so am I right in my understanding that - Ansible VAULTLinux Machine?

    • @infamousjoeg
      @infamousjoeg  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would be: Linux Ansible Conjur/CCP Vault

  • @gkaruk
    @gkaruk 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very useful for our company as just looking to using Ansible for our Windows estate and CyberArk integration is key requirement Ansible/Tower must meet. What version of CyberArk is this video based on and is that a requirement for integration?

    • @infamousjoeg
      @infamousjoeg  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This was demonstrated on CyberArk v10.2, but doesn't have any version requirements. As long as you own a license for our Centralized Credential Provider, you're good to go!

  • @sumitkumar-vn7cx
    @sumitkumar-vn7cx 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can see you were using both CCP and local credential provider. I am still not understand why we needed local provider?

    • @infamousjoeg
      @infamousjoeg  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Local providers are more directed at Tier 0/1 applications that require a six sigma uptime. By being local, we can persist a network failure from the network around the application server. As long as the application is still stable as a service, we can still serve it the secrets it needs to commit transactions, continue the business, and make sure the lights stay on.