He did his part, the most important part....he posed the question and sparked the mind of humanity to explore. Team work makes the dream work, even beyond lifetimes
Smart AF instead of just telling them and .asking people think he'd crazy, he got them so curious they would have to ask to ask and actual listen to what he had to say!
Sir Isaac Newton is widely recognized for his contributions to physics and his formulation of the laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation. Here’s a brief overview of Newton’s theories: 1. Laws of Motion: Newton’s laws of motion provide a fundamental framework for understanding the motion of objects. They are as follows: a. Newton’s First Law (Law of Inertia): An object at rest will remain at rest, and an object in motion will continue moving in a straight line at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. b. Newton’s Second Law (Law of Acceleration): The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting upon it and inversely proportional to its mass. This law is commonly expressed as F = ma, where F represents the force applied to an object, m represents its mass, and a represents its acceleration. c. Newton’s Third Law (Law of Action-Reaction): For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. When one object exerts a force on a second object, the second object simultaneously exerts a force of equal magnitude but in the opposite direction on the first object. 2. Law of Universal Gravitation: Newton’s law of universal gravitation describes the gravitational force between two objects. It states that every particle of matter attracts every other particle with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. This law explains the motion of celestial bodies, such as planets orbiting the Sun. Newton’s theories revolutionized the understanding of motion and gravity, laying the foundation for classical mechanics. They provided a mathematical framework for describing and predicting the behavior of objects on Earth and in space. Newton’s theories have since served as the basis for countless scientific advancements and continue to be fundamental principles in the field of physics.
Newton is probably the GOAT of all physicists. Boy developed the physics necessary to solve his problems at the same rate we learn it in high-school/college. He was also only like 19-26 years old. Absolute top G
@@jiimwilkes76 Newton made several arguments against John Harrison’s marine chronometer during the 18th century. Harrison’s chronometer was a revolutionary device designed to accurately determine longitude at sea. While Newton was skeptical of Harrison’s invention, it’s important to note that his concerns were primarily based on theoretical grounds rather than practical evidence. Newton’s arguments against Harrison can be summarized as follows: 1. Newton believed that the motion of a ship at sea would render any mechanical device ineffective in accurately measuring time. He argued that the unpredictability of a ship’s movement, including vibrations, pitching, and rolling, would hinder the performance of a chronometer. 2. Newton also questioned the long-term reliability of Harrison’s chronometer, as he believed that changes in temperature and humidity, common at sea, would affect its precision. He argued that the materials used in the construction of the chronometer would expand or contract, causing inaccuracies in timekeeping. 3. Another concern raised by Newton was the potential impact of magnetism on the chronometer. He argued that the presence of iron or other magnetic materials on a ship could interfere with the accuracy of the timekeeping mechanism. 4. Additionally, Newton expressed skepticism regarding the practicality and cost of manufacturing such a complex device. He believed that Harrison’s chronometer would be too expensive and challenging to produce on a large scale, limiting its usefulness to seafarers. It’s worth noting that despite Newton’s skepticism, Harrison’s chronometer eventually proved its reliability and accuracy. In fact, it played a significant role in solving the long-standing problem of determining longitude at sea, revolutionizing navigation and contributing to safer and more efficient maritime travel.
@@DittyDafku The question of who the greatest physicist of all time is subjective and depends on personal opinions and criteria for greatness. There are a few physicists who are widely recognized for their groundbreaking contributions to the field. I agree, & one may argue that one such figure *is* Newton, who formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation, laying the foundation for classical physics. Albert Einstein is another prominent physicist known for his theory of relativity, which revolutionized our understanding of space, time, and gravity. Other notable physicists include James Clerk Maxwell, who unified electricity and magnetism, and Richard Feynman, who made significant contributions to quantum mechanics. Each of these physicists made profound discoveries and advancements in their respective eras, and their work continues to influence and shape our understanding of the physical world.
Einstein formulated relativistic theory on PROVABLE ASSUMPTIONS of gravimetric distortions, not PROVABLE UNDERLYING CONSTRUCTS. In other words, quantum gravity was not explained with Einsteins work on a cosmological scale. Planck Spaces and all that, you see.
@@nickxenix you know in scientific term "theory" is something that is proven, observed and stated as fact. It is the same as "law". To be honest it is a more sophisticated form of "law". If something is a theory, then it is well accepted and regarded as true. But in a common way of saying (non-scientific) "theory" is an idea or thought (that may or may not be proved) which is equivalent to "hypothesis" in scientific term.
@@sweetyx1180 I don't know. But space time isn't verified or something real. It doesn't exist in reality. As no one even knows space fabric or space time.
Einstein deduced that gravity is the distortion of space in the vicinity of mass-energy. Space itself is actually a kind of field which reacts to particles with inertia/momentum.
@@johncampbell829 Beg to differ! From Mercury's orbit, Eddington's eclipse, the atom bomb, GPS, Black holes and gravity waves, none of the predictions of Einsteins's equations have failed. You might argue there is more to discover, but nobody can say his "theory" is anything but true. A theory in Physics is more than just a conjecture!
@@lastchance8142 aren't black holes exactly where Einstein's theory fails? And quantum mechanics comes to solve that, but the theories are incompatible
@@DaCurse0 Not exactly. Black holes were predicted by his theory, and found to actually exist in 1971, 50 years later. Imagine predicting something no one had ever seen, and then it was found. That sounds like a win to me! Now, what's exactly happening at the center of the BH is still debated. General Relativity implies there is a singularity, and Roger Penrose did the math on that with Steven Hawking, for which he got a Nobel prize. But some physicists can't deal with the infinite density of a singularity and propose that some quantum processes must be at play, especially because of the scale involved. Unfortunately, quantum theory and relativity don't play well together, so they are looking for new physics to fix that. If this is what you mean by relativity "failed", you might just as well say that quantum mechanics has "failed". It's really not the failure of either one, they are both wildly successful theories. It's just that we continue to find new questions in this wonderful and complicated creation. Someday, new science will emerge to answer these questions, but in the meantime, Einstein's equations have no peer. Are you aware of a better system describing space and time?
@@johncampbell829 i guess you need to learn what it takes for a hypothesis to become a Theory. Basically, once something is accepted as a Theory, it's as good as saying 'this is fact'. Don't get 'common usage' of the word theory mixed up with what a scientific Theory is.
Newton and Einstein are probably the smartest people ever born. They did so much to advance human civilization, their efforts should never be under appreciated.
it is the curvaton of space time. Though it is not yet agreed. The most likely answer is that their is no such thing as completely empty space. The absence of something in of itself defines the existence of something else you can not yet see.
Gravitational force of attraction of a definite body doesnot require any medium for its influence on other body. Just like sponteneous hydrogen and helium reaction in the Sun causes electromagnetic radiation to get radiated from Sun, to space and touching the surface of Earth due to gravitational pull of Earth.
The whole idea of curved space looks good but it is just another formula that describes the effects of gravity a little bit better then newtons. Meaning if you take that space in isolation and try to test whether it is curved or not, the only quality that it has that is different from the non curved space is its gravitational effect. That means that the space curvature is a mathematical model after all, and doesn’t describe the gravity meaning wise any better then newtons way. Off course the calculations are more precise i am just talking about the “why” of the gravity.
Did you miss the word "basically?" Insofar as directly observable reasons why 2 stellar bodies influence one another, the space between them is empty. Then we look deeper.
Some how I doubt Isaac Newton would be embarrassed especially since we're still using his classical mechanics, gravity, and calculus in 2023. He had to leave something for later scientist and mathematicians to discover.
I think there is a video of Einstein saying that Newton was smarter than he was because Newton knew his theory was wrong. I wish I could find that video.
It's funny how we have fields for magnetism, the weak force, and the strong force; but gravity is just bent space. Make up an entirely new mechanism for a similar phenomenon, just because it is exceptionally weak. 🤔
From advice. Imagine the vacuum as the air at first. The earth is not breaking any dimensions under itself, it just twirls in the direction of the star, which moves in the direction of hole. And it is just coincidence
Sir Issac Newton really was the greatest mathematician and he always will be! His idea of light and other parts of physics is inaccurate and incomplete.
Here's my theory We all know the laws of magnets right 2 exact poles repel but 2 opposites attract So I believe that the law magnetism stretches far beyond that just that humans haven't figured it out just yet So now going back to the question put on hold in the videon My theory suggests that gravity can be inverted rather than pulling in it pushes out (2 exact poles) but at the same time it attracts parts of it attract while the other part repel In a way to prove my theory Put equally powerful 2 bar magnets a north facing a south a reasonable distance from each other but close enough not to repel each other and attach Put a iron object exactly a fair distance in between them and see it struggling to go to either magnets and they'd be stuck in the middle an infinite cycle of confusion meaning that It can't leave any of the poles gravitational pull possibly stretching it out til it eventually breaks apart
Dark energy is the very fabric of space. The more dense a celetial body is, the more pull is has on the fabric of space(gravity) Gravity is a necessary phenomena for dark energy to be transmuted into light energy. Eg the sun 🤷♂️
The dirty little secret is neither Newton or Einstein knew how or why gravity even works. Astrophysicist Neil deGrassi Tyson even stated so. Pro. Brian Cox said gravity remains illusive. Thomas M. Dutkiewicz
Both of the above, saw it has consequence of space , something space( space time) causes it, we don't know by how and how many dimensions it has, Einstein described it with 4d and somehow visualised it in simplest way which only some people understand
Weird to describe this as a "dirty little secret". It's not really a secret, but more importantly it doesn't matter for their findings. You don't have to know why something works to be able to deduce other things using it.
It's not a dirty little secret, if you actually finished high school. We can see all of the effects of gravity, but have yet to come up with a conclusive test to directly investigate gravity. That's it. That's all. Many great scientific discoveries, weren't able to be verified in the discoverers lifetime, but thats why science is an ongoing process. It's beautiful
I don't suspect it being empty space I suspect it being in a rotation of different levels of minerals so ask yourself every big ass damn we put up how far away are we taking the other side to it
Law of entanglement? Once two particles experience a shared state they are no longer separate entities but exist as one. In this case the shared state must be the Big Bang. This is more of a question than answer lol
Well how many hundreds of years before Einstein was able to with help describe in mathematics that gravity is an expansion of time and compression of space that is gravity. We can measure the distortion of time today when we fly from California to DC. The watch on our wrist is not in synch with either Time zone. The difference is relativity and is about thirty minutes..
No. Electromagnetism has s 'carrier particle', called a photon. And electromagnetism is very strong (orders of magnitude more than gravity) but only over a short distances.
@@Chris-hx3om How is a photon a carrier particle for a pulling force? I get that EM waves are photons in motion, but when you talk about a magnetic field pulling something towards it like a gravitational field, the movement of photons is less intuitive as a cause.
He did his part, the most important part....he posed the question and sparked the mind of humanity to explore. Team work makes the dream work, even beyond lifetimes
Well said.
@@orsino6829without a beginning we wouldn't have an end. Every part is important
Very well said!
Nothing wiser than saying “I don’t know.”
are you sure? what about saying "i know"?
@@CoffeeMonster01a wise person will explain rather then saying i know or he will be just silent
@@CoffeeMonster01 every prophet ever
@@CoffeeMonster01egoistic
@@ranhiburan501or write "ill leave that to the consideration of the reader"
*Then Einstein climbed up on Newtons shoulders to get the better view.*
Way too much underrated comment ❤
It was Mileva😊
Beautiful comment 👌
How original.
@@danemiljus5485 keep dreaming
What a way to say “now it’s your turn kids” to the next generation, he was a wise man
Albert Einstein : And I took that personally
Smart AF instead of just telling them and .asking people think he'd crazy, he got them so curious they would have to ask to ask and actual listen to what he had to say!
So how can we know shit , at all….
They would probably just say it was the lords miracle
And then Einstein came along...
And uttered a stream of bullshit
🥵
Yes, but even Einstein didnt sove the problem. Whe we dont know yet, why mass causes gravity.
@@FB-jg2xqwell you don’t ! Try studying
@@FB-jg2xqi think its just you
Sir Isaac Newton is widely recognized for his contributions to physics and his formulation of the laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation. Here’s a brief overview of Newton’s theories:
1. Laws of Motion: Newton’s laws of motion provide a fundamental framework for understanding the motion of objects. They are as follows:
a. Newton’s First Law (Law of Inertia): An object at rest will remain at rest, and an object in motion will continue moving in a straight line at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.
b. Newton’s Second Law (Law of Acceleration): The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting upon it and inversely proportional to its mass. This law is commonly expressed as F = ma, where F represents the force applied to an object, m represents its mass, and a represents its acceleration.
c. Newton’s Third Law (Law of Action-Reaction): For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. When one object exerts a force on a second object, the second object simultaneously exerts a force of equal magnitude but in the opposite direction on the first object.
2. Law of Universal Gravitation: Newton’s law of universal gravitation describes the gravitational force between two objects. It states that every particle of matter attracts every other particle with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. This law explains the motion of celestial bodies, such as planets orbiting the Sun.
Newton’s theories revolutionized the understanding of motion and gravity, laying the foundation for classical mechanics. They provided a mathematical framework for describing and predicting the behavior of objects on Earth and in space. Newton’s theories have since served as the basis for countless scientific advancements and continue to be fundamental principles in the field of physics.
Newton couldn't understand mechanics argued against John Harrison for over twenty years .
Harrison proven correct.
Newton is probably the GOAT of all physicists. Boy developed the physics necessary to solve his problems at the same rate we learn it in high-school/college. He was also only like 19-26 years old. Absolute top G
nice chatgpt comment
@@jiimwilkes76 Newton made several arguments against John Harrison’s marine chronometer during the 18th century. Harrison’s chronometer was a revolutionary device designed to accurately determine longitude at sea. While Newton was skeptical of Harrison’s invention, it’s important to note that his concerns were primarily based on theoretical grounds rather than practical evidence. Newton’s arguments against Harrison can be summarized as follows:
1. Newton believed that the motion of a ship at sea would render any mechanical device ineffective in accurately measuring time. He argued that the unpredictability of a ship’s movement, including vibrations, pitching, and rolling, would hinder the performance of a chronometer.
2. Newton also questioned the long-term reliability of Harrison’s chronometer, as he believed that changes in temperature and humidity, common at sea, would affect its precision. He argued that the materials used in the construction of the chronometer would expand or contract, causing inaccuracies in timekeeping.
3. Another concern raised by Newton was the potential impact of magnetism on the chronometer. He argued that the presence of iron or other magnetic materials on a ship could interfere with the accuracy of the timekeeping mechanism.
4. Additionally, Newton expressed skepticism regarding the practicality and cost of manufacturing such a complex device. He believed that Harrison’s chronometer would be too expensive and challenging to produce on a large scale, limiting its usefulness to seafarers.
It’s worth noting that despite Newton’s skepticism, Harrison’s chronometer eventually proved its reliability and accuracy. In fact, it played a significant role in solving the long-standing problem of determining longitude at sea, revolutionizing navigation and contributing to safer and more efficient maritime travel.
@@DittyDafku The question of who the greatest physicist of all time is subjective and depends on personal opinions and criteria for greatness.
There are a few physicists who are widely recognized for their groundbreaking contributions to the field.
I agree, & one may argue that one such figure *is* Newton, who formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation, laying the foundation for classical physics.
Albert Einstein is another prominent physicist known for his theory of relativity, which revolutionized our understanding of space, time, and gravity.
Other notable physicists include James Clerk Maxwell, who unified electricity and magnetism, and Richard Feynman, who made significant contributions to quantum mechanics.
Each of these physicists made profound discoveries and advancements in their respective eras, and their work continues to influence and shape our understanding of the physical world.
And The Reader who solved it was Albert Einstein
Einstein formulated relativistic theory on PROVABLE ASSUMPTIONS of gravimetric distortions, not PROVABLE UNDERLYING CONSTRUCTS. In other words, quantum gravity was not explained with Einsteins work on a cosmological scale. Planck Spaces and all that, you see.
@@quandarkumtanglehairs4743Therefore, Theory.
Who proved that there's no such thing as 'gravity', that the effect called gravity is just the result of a mass moving through bent space-time.
@@nickxenix you know in scientific term "theory" is something that is proven, observed and stated as fact. It is the same as "law". To be honest it is a more sophisticated form of "law". If something is a theory, then it is well accepted and regarded as true.
But in a common way of saying (non-scientific) "theory" is an idea or thought (that may or may not be proved) which is equivalent to "hypothesis" in scientific term.
@@quandarkumtanglehairs4743 obviously bro...a magnificent work.
200 years later, einstein came and said « it’s the space »
200 years later einstein was like eureka and we discovered it was magnets doing it the whole time
almost 100 years old and they are both wrong
@@bathin813 what is the correct
@@sweetyx1180 I don't know. But space time isn't verified or something real. It doesn't exist in reality. As no one even knows space fabric or space time.
@@bathin813How could the base the fundamental of nature can't exist in a reality?
Einstein deduced that gravity is the distortion of space in the vicinity of mass-energy. Space itself is actually a kind of field which reacts to particles with inertia/momentum.
It’s still called THEORY….it’s never been proven
@@johncampbell829 Beg to differ! From Mercury's orbit, Eddington's eclipse, the atom bomb, GPS, Black holes and gravity waves, none of the predictions of Einsteins's equations have failed. You might argue there is more to discover, but nobody can say his "theory" is anything but true. A theory in Physics is more than just a conjecture!
@@lastchance8142 aren't black holes exactly where Einstein's theory fails? And quantum mechanics comes to solve that, but the theories are incompatible
@@DaCurse0 Not exactly. Black holes were predicted by his theory, and found to actually exist in 1971, 50 years later. Imagine predicting something no one had ever seen, and then it was found. That sounds like a win to me! Now, what's exactly happening at the center of the BH is still debated. General Relativity implies there is a singularity, and Roger Penrose did the math on that with Steven Hawking, for which he got a Nobel prize. But some physicists can't deal with the infinite density of a singularity and propose that some quantum processes must be at play, especially because of the scale involved. Unfortunately, quantum theory and relativity don't play well together, so they are looking for new physics to fix that. If this is what you mean by relativity "failed", you might just as well say that quantum mechanics has "failed". It's really not the failure of either one, they are both wildly successful theories. It's just that we continue to find new questions in this wonderful and complicated creation. Someday, new science will emerge to answer these questions, but in the meantime, Einstein's equations have no peer.
Are you aware of a better system describing space and time?
@@johncampbell829 i guess you need to learn what it takes for a hypothesis to become a Theory. Basically, once something is accepted as a Theory, it's as good as saying 'this is fact'. Don't get 'common usage' of the word theory mixed up with what a scientific Theory is.
Wellcome My lovely Teachers
This is humble
Newton did not just ask the question. He described what gravity does precisely, using mathematics. He did not know HOW gravity does it.
Einstein was like: don't worry bruv, I got you covered.
Vibrational frequencies working with a variety of magnetic forces both negative and positive
"I leave that to the consideration of the reader". That's exactly what I wrote in the exam and my teacher failed me...😄
And the Reader came in the 19th century with the name of Einstein 🎉🎉
One of the questions was a momentary mindfk .
and ppl give all the credit to that damn apple, it didn't even fall on his head, he was just sitting in the shade of an apple tree
Newton was humble
Newton and Einstein are probably the smartest people ever born. They did so much to advance human civilization, their efforts should never be under appreciated.
He was the one who open it up
it is the curvaton of space time. Though it is not yet agreed. The most likely answer is that their is no such thing as completely empty space. The absence of something in of itself defines the existence of something else you can not yet see.
Gravitational force of attraction of a definite body doesnot require any medium for its influence on other body. Just like sponteneous hydrogen and helium reaction in the Sun causes electromagnetic radiation to get radiated from Sun, to space and touching the surface of Earth due to gravitational pull of Earth.
Just over glorification of Newton, many cultures around the world had written about gravity and formulated several ideas. Same goes for calculus.
The whole idea of curved space looks good but it is just another formula that describes the effects of gravity a little bit better then newtons. Meaning if you take that space in isolation and try to test whether it is curved or not, the only quality that it has that is different from the non curved space is its gravitational effect. That means that the space curvature is a mathematical model after all, and doesn’t describe the gravity meaning wise any better then newtons way. Off course the calculations are more precise i am just talking about the “why” of the gravity.
They are connected by the fabric of space. Things do have to have mutual contact to influence each other. Space isn't as empty as it seems
The space between celestial bodies is not empty.
It's not?
Did you miss the word "basically?"
Insofar as directly observable reasons why 2 stellar bodies influence one another, the space between them is empty. Then we look deeper.
And we really dont know yet, Eisntein have improved a lot with the Relativity theory, but we still dont know why mass causes gravity.
Newtonian physics leads to spooky action.
La tela del espacio que soporta el peso de las estrellas...y ahora la teoría de cuerdas....para abrir la tela y ver el otro lado ....genial.....😅
They did have this things called compass back then just for analogy...
space is not empty, space is space.
I figured it out a LONG time ago! JESUS CREATED EVERYTHING THE WAY IT IS, AND SUSTAINS THE UNIVERSE WITH HIS WORD!
Why couldn’t it have been like magnetic force? Isn’t that what physicists are hoping for when searching for gravitons?
"Anyone who claims to understand quantum is incorrect. "Entanglement
is approachable only by
probability. A best guess.
Newton born again as einstein😊
Galileo born again as Newton.
Some how I doubt Isaac Newton would be embarrassed especially since we're still using his classical mechanics, gravity, and calculus in 2023. He had to leave something for later scientist and mathematicians to discover.
I think there is a video of Einstein saying that Newton was smarter than he was because Newton knew his theory was wrong. I wish I could find that video.
It's funny how we have fields for magnetism, the weak force, and the strong force; but gravity is just bent space. Make up an entirely new mechanism for a similar phenomenon, just because it is exceptionally weak. 🤔
From advice. Imagine the vacuum as the air at first. The earth is not breaking any dimensions under itself, it just twirls in the direction of the star, which moves in the direction of hole. And it is just coincidence
Space is not empty the medium is ether but the body of The sun that effects the earths body is Dark gravity
Sir Issac Newton really was the greatest mathematician and he always will be! His idea of light and other parts of physics is inaccurate and incomplete.
But I deeply love him and so does Sir Albert Einstein. ❤️❤️
The answer my friend, is blowin in the wind
This is why England has all the best minds.
Here's my theory
We all know the laws of magnets right
2 exact poles repel but 2 opposites attract
So I believe that the law magnetism stretches far beyond that just that humans haven't figured it out just yet
So now going back to the question put on hold in the videon
My theory suggests that gravity can be inverted rather than pulling in it pushes out (2 exact poles) but at the same time it attracts parts of it attract while the other part repel
In a way to prove my theory
Put equally powerful 2 bar magnets a north facing a south a reasonable distance from each other but close enough not to repel each other and attach
Put a iron object exactly a fair distance in between them and see it struggling to go to either magnets and they'd be stuck in the middle
an infinite cycle of confusion meaning that It can't leave any of the poles gravitational pull possibly stretching it out til it eventually breaks apart
**enter spacetime**
Field Theory entered. But gravitonen still needs to be experimental shown.
Sun's magnetic field interacts with earth's magnetic field.
You are the chosen 0ne
I think Einstein theorized it as space time warping
Yea. It is called Aeter and it is also in your fantasy world called space vacuum.
Yeh they are connected by blutooth!
That Einstein kid was smart I would say .
Dark energy is the very fabric of space.
The more dense a celetial body is, the more pull is has on the fabric of space(gravity)
Gravity is a necessary phenomena for dark energy to be transmuted into light energy. Eg the sun 🤷♂️
You can if you fart, the other body Definatly moves.😊
All theories. ...The truth is far from these....
Einstein : i got this
The sun and moon are the same size and same distance from earth.
Because it's not just empty space !
Because All in the Universe is Connected.
And one day.. this book fell on young Einstein's head in the library and he read the book. 😂
Lmaooo
And how does a magnet affect a piece of iron sitting a few inches away, no contact between them?
Every atom has a gravitational pull and with zenillions of atoms you have a planet.
Thank goodness Einstein was around in history
Thats answer in einstein equation
The dirty little secret is neither Newton or Einstein knew how or why gravity even works. Astrophysicist Neil deGrassi Tyson even stated so. Pro. Brian Cox said gravity remains illusive.
Thomas M. Dutkiewicz
Both of the above, saw it has consequence of space , something space( space time) causes it, we don't know by how and how many dimensions it has, Einstein described it with 4d and somehow visualised it in simplest way which only some people understand
But we know gravity travels, as fastest it could in 4d dimension wave, as light travels always faster, constant to c whenever it deviates
Weird to describe this as a "dirty little secret". It's not really a secret, but more importantly it doesn't matter for their findings. You don't have to know why something works to be able to deduce other things using it.
It's not a dirty little secret, if you actually finished high school. We can see all of the effects of gravity, but have yet to come up with a conclusive test to directly investigate gravity. That's it. That's all.
Many great scientific discoveries, weren't able to be verified in the discoverers lifetime, but thats why science is an ongoing process. It's beautiful
Then they should have read Vedas
Then they would've just been even more lost, especially considering they're completely baseless.
@@GustavRexit's not easy to understand the vedas specially when you are reading a translated version. So, your baseless point is baseless.
Marilyn Monroe's body influenced countless other bodies without any contact.
Continues to do so actually.
I think density is infinite, space has density, its just not perceivable by us.
The space is not empty
Newton wasn’t the first to think and write about this
Then who was it?
actually he figured it out with calculus .
First "I leave it as an exercise to the reader"
How about Megnates ?? they affect each other without touching
Energy... Matter reacts to energy.
It is black due to the universe in black holes
God it’s real that’s how
I don't suspect it being empty space I suspect it being in a rotation of different levels of minerals so ask yourself every big ass damn we put up how far away are we taking the other side to it
Or how much mineral linked in quality are consistent value of coming back or we lose if it's not organized properly
Then Einstein came and said yeah i have 3 solutions for everything 😅
God put it there
Law of entanglement? Once two particles experience a shared state they are no longer separate entities but exist as one. In this case the shared state must be the Big Bang. This is more of a question than answer lol
Interesting 😊
😂😂😂did he really thought we could figure it out or was he just laughing at our stupidity?
The numbers worked out. How different parts of the universe communicate came from Faraday, Maxwell, and Einstein.
AE then said; give me that piece of chalk, have a seat … ✍🏼
The space between the sun and earth isn't empty.. there's always energy and it's this energy that is somehow influencing the 2
The best teacher
When you’re trying to get an answer using unverifiable and unrepeatable theories…….you know…..such as gravity
Sure kid
Is space material object, or just geometrical distance between objects?😅
Then, Einstein entered the chat of Principia.
Space isn’t empty
It took 200 years before Einstein came along to try and solve that issue
Well how many hundreds of years before Einstein was able to with help describe in mathematics that gravity is an expansion of time and compression of space that is gravity. We can measure the distortion of time today when we fly from California to DC. The watch on our wrist is not in synch with either Time zone. The difference is relativity and is about thirty minutes..
Velocity of mass creates gravity. The gravity at the equator of spinning planets is greater. We see the rings of Saturn explained by Einstein.
Hail of my master
God
Einstein has entered the chat:
Does this apply to electromagnetism? Also influences objects across empty space without contact
No. Electromagnetism has s 'carrier particle', called a photon. And electromagnetism is very strong (orders of magnitude more than gravity) but only over a short distances.
@@Chris-hx3om How is a photon a carrier particle for a pulling force? I get that EM waves are photons in motion, but when you talk about a magnetic field pulling something towards it like a gravitational field, the movement of photons is less intuitive as a cause.
How can a body exert influence on space and time, or, what fans of AE would rather say, „spacetime“??????
Please explain.
I couldn't figure out why I started writing this comment, so I will leave it to the discernment of the reader.
That's a more honest answer than trying to ascribe to God.