ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- Neil knowing too much
He knows stuff
Movie: Tenet (2020)
Director: Christopher Nolan
Starring: John David Washington, Robert Pattinson, Elizabeth Debicki, Kenneth Branagh, Dimple Kapadia, Himesh Patel, Aaron Taylor-Johnson
Fair use
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended.
#Tenet #ChristopherNolan
All footage belongs to Warner Bros. Pictures
Channel: Player1
Title: Neil knowing too much for 2 minutes straight
It's kinda sad knowing that the Protagonist sees a stranger when they meet, but Neil sees a friend he knows for years, and knows that their time together is very limited.
Don't worry, the Protagonist will experience that soon enough
Neil doesn't know he's going to die until the last mission. For him, that's still the future. Obviously someone could have told him what happened in the future (Neil's past), but no reason in-universe to assume that happened.
Reminds me of the doctor and his wife River Song
No Neil didn't know that.
@@SemanthaJen :((
Neil : *knows everything*
Robert Pattinson : " There were times during the shooting, I had no idea what was going on "
Robert Pattinson is like the complete opposite of Neil
🤣🤣🤣
Plot twist: the real name of the protagonist is nosnittaP treboR
I think Robert Pattinsons acting during this movie however showed that he knew indeed what was going on, I think he actually understood the script
Rob just lies through all his interviews
The first time you watch this film, you see it from the perspective of the protagonist.
.
The second time you watch it, you see it from niel’s perspective.
.
Classic nolan
I rewatched for the second time the other day, and saw the entire movie from Neil’s perspective. Really puts a whole different twist on it and how far back Neil has gone in time.
@Swastik Barua It really wasnt, I dont think any other director could pull off this concept as well as he has. Just cause you dont understand the movie doesnt mean its trash lol
@Swastik Barua
Your projecting a lot
You dont even know what type of movies they watched and you just say the dialog is bad without presenting a example. A example id credit you with is the way the protagonist is literally called the protagonist and even refers to himself as such thats a very silly thing
@Swastik Barua why do you feel so pressed lmao, drink a milk then go to bed
@Swastik Barua “☝️🤓”
I just want a sequel with the protagonist “meeting” Neil and recruiting him. Really solid chemistry
Nolan never makes sequels to his original work but maybe he'll make an exception for this one
Player1 I hope so man this movie felt like it left so much to be explored. They even said that it was really a beginning at the end of the movie
@@Player-kg1ds Nolan would never do that...That would mean, a spooning feeding film for people who doesn't understood Tenet. He never explains plot clearly in film and leaves it to audience to figure it out.
Throughout the film its hinted that Neil is Maximilien the son of Kat. See how Neil came from last 4 letters of Maximilien and its inverted lieN = Neil. So Protg. went on to live with Kat and Max hence thats why Neil knows so much about Protag.
@@AA-xk1uv that's true. For Inception even, the ending scene was explained by (not him) Michael Kaine, that too after 10 years of Inception. He's a maestro. Always leaving subtle messages in his movies related to human nature and scope, especially in terms of relationship (no, not just romantically). I love this man, genuinely ❤️
"You never drink on the job"
"You're well informed"
"Yeah, you told me in the future"
Makes sense xD
It should be “Yeah, you told me in the past”
@@skunkpirates That's Right. Neil doesn't exist in the future.
@@Snofuzz he came from the future. I think kate's son is the Neil.
@@soewaiyanaung he's not from the future. Think about it. Also listen to what Neil says to TP he hints him.
Neil deserves a spin off of his own. Easily the most entertaining, most memorable character in the film!
Agreed
Agree. And I'm not trying to take away anything from the compliment, but it's not like he had any sort of competition, neither from the other characters or cast. . Like, for example, the characters and cast of Inception.
@@smaller_cathedrals I think more than the cast, it was the characters who weren’t that well-written. Also, I agree with the “Inception” comparison. The entire cast in that movie was solid. They sold the shit out of half-baked characters. Not all actors can be that way, unfortunately. And in Tenet’s case, I believe the cast was pretty good. But just fell short of being good enough to elevate a weak script.
Robert Pattinson did a very good job, I’m impressed.
You mean the only memorable character in the film.
Let's start with the simple stuff. See every law of physics...
Ah yes, the simplest of the stuff
... every law of physics can be formulated to be symmetrical forwards and backwards in time. This is the time component of CPT symmetry or Charge Conjugation, Parity Transformation and Time Reversal Symmetry. Only our subjective experience shows time's arrow going from low entropy to high entropy, or from many options to a finalized state.
@@JinKee That's actually what's in the script, I think
@@JinKee The heat equation isn't symmetrical by time
@Ulsacerdos wait that was a line in the movie ("every law of physics...") ? If so I didn't want to be that asshole, I just wanted to point out something, my bad :D
The sidekick he never knew he needed.
It's funny because this works both in the present and in the future
Not just the sidekick he needed but the sidekick he deserved.
@@hugofontes5708 It's funny because in the future Neil would be The Protagonist and The Protagonist is the sidekick/puppetmaster.
Literally
partner*
So,
Neil = manga reader
The Protagonist = anime only
LMAO
The most accurate description lol
AT EVERY PLOT POINT YOU SEEM TO KNOW TO MUCH NOW I’M GONNA ASK YOU... DID YOU READ THE MANGA
@@joshpellegrini1233 No
*Breathing hard*
Aot is trash
W E L I V E I N A T W I L I G H T W O R L D
And there are no friends at dusk
@@Player-kg1ds you've been made, the siege is a blast for them to vanish you.
@@gondwanaman9362 oh wow. He told that to the Well Dressed Man, but in the end it was himself that everyone thought was dead by fake suicide pill.
@@Player-kg1ds Legend...... wait for it........
And there are Bella at Breaking Dawn
Honestly, what I find really compelling about Tenet is that last bit the Protagonist says. Does being here, being alive, mean that they succeed? Fatalism is always painted as very pessimistic and bleak, but imagine how much of a confidence boost it would be to know your actions will matter. Self-actualization in Tenet is made literal; by the Protag working for himself. If you work for your future, your future will work for you.
This is what makes it a LOT easier to watch Neil walk to his own death at the end knowingly: He already knows what he dies for will work because he just lived through the ending of it.
Sounds good, doesn't work. Free will isn't a thing.
For all we know he can just live for another 10 years forward and going backward when he's had enough and think its about the time to close the loop. The movie didnt show us his face under the helmet when he's dead anyway
bestie u are so right omg go off
@@---kn2go You missed the point of the movie if this is your take away from it mate hahaha
Tenet needs a sequel. Robert Pattinson's needs to be expanded upon.
Yes
The sequel should have Neil as the protagonist getting recruited by John David Washington from the future, ending at the opera scene.
@@Sfaegbe That would be lit
I agree
@@Sfaegbe a perfect sequel
You can tell from the little smile he cracks at 0:06 he's happy to see his friend but obviously can't give away why he, from TPs perspective, would be so happy to see a random stranger.
I'd even speculate he's happy to see his stepdad :O
"Does your head hurt yet?"
"yes..."
Probably the most relevant line in the entire movie lmao
Try to sleep
Alternative title: The Protagonist knowing nothing for 2 minutes straight
He's the Jon Snow of the NCU.
Lol
It took me twice to realize that the way protagonist ask Neil "DID YOU TALK". is because last time when someone "talk",he lost his whole team.
Sorry what do you mean? During the Opera house?
@@henrik1743 yep
I think one detail, that perhaps might not be intentional (then again, it's Nolan here, so it probably is intentional), is that when Neil first meets Protagonist and shakes his hand he almost seems to be in disbelief that he doesn't recognize him. It's kind of a look like "Wow you really _don't_ recognize me, do you?" Obviously on first watch it doesn't look like anything, but after seeing everything, his slight pause seems to hold a lot more meaning.
Nice observation :D
You're totally right, there's a whole swirl of thoughts and emotions in Niel's eyes when he introduces himself.
He looks high af lol
1:10 Neil is just like, oh dear, shouldn't have said that, should not have said that. Changing the subject now!
Exactly!
Just like Hagrid!
@@diegoacarrillo14Thank you for catching my reference!!
This is the evidence that makes me believe the max is Neil theory . How did he know that?!
My favorite part about Neil is his theme.
It’s a beautiful theme, having a sort of Palindrome-like melody that shows how he is able to know about Tenet Backwards and Forwards. It expresses everything what the character is and what he knows about the Inversion.
it’s brilliant writing down to the T. When you watch it for the first time, it sounds he’s asking a question, only watching back did I realize Neil was giving him an answer that he doesn’t drink alcohol. Incredible misdirection.
Agreed
"in a parallel world's theory we can't know the relationship between consciousness and multiple realities" this is actually a great reference/explanation to TP's question of inevitability
Is anyone else on board with the idea that Neil is actually Max from the future repaying him for saving his mother?
Me
Yeah, many disagree. But not us
I disagree, but it’s an interesting theory to say the least
The only issue with that theory for me is how uncaring Neil acts seeing his mother shot and might possibly die (even if you consider that he knows she lives, but that panic isn't there on his face like it had when he first time sees the young protagonist).
I have an extension to the theory that the Protagonist actually takes a bullet for younger Neil in the future, much like how Neil took one for him. It’d be poetic.
Okay, Neil knowing the exact day Sator was missing is the single best evidence I've seen for Neil being Max.
LMAO
If that's true, how long would Max have to Iive in an inverted world before becoming Neil in the movie?
Absolutely true 💯
yep, Neil is Max.
Neil/Max deserves his own movie.
“Every law of physics..” always reminds me of “every magic trick..”
Yeah it does kind of sound like that
Literally thought the same thing
Every great magic trick consists of three parts or acts. The first part is called "The Pledge". The magician shows you something ordinary: a deck of cards, a bird or a man. He shows you this object. Perhaps he asks you to inspect it to see if it is indeed real, unaltered, normal. But of course... it probably isn't. The second act is called "The Turn". The magician takes the ordinary something and makes it do something extraordinary. Now you're looking for the secret... but you won't find it, because of course you're not really looking. You don't really want to know. You want to be fooled. But you wouldn't clap yet. Because making something disappear isn't enough; you have to bring it back. That's why every magic trick has a third act, the hardest part, the part we call "The Prestige"."
What is that from
@@nikicarrie4071 The Prestige
Neil was pretty lit in his introductory scene and he probably slipped up revealing that he knows Pro's on the job drink, playing it off as though he's well informed.
Neil knows he's going to die by the end of the mission and prolly got drunk to cope with his impending sacrifice, he's such an interesting and mysterious character. The shining gem of the movie
"Not going to London to check on Kat, are ya?"
"Not even from afar?"
Only 3 people are there who survived the Climax-London scene who knew The Protagonist checked out Kat from afar.
Kat, The Protagonist and ..........
Amazing catch!
That's a good way to look at it!
Further explain please
@@gabereal917 maximil-LIEN = NEIL
@@gabereal917 Neil is a grown up Max, Kat's son.
Neil explaining Physics to his mum 💕 0:52
Yes!
i wish this was true but he really didnt act like his mum was laying there shot even if he knew she would live im sure i would be hard for me to act like he didnt care either way!
@@neoism He already knew that she would survive, since he's already lived through this.
not his mum.
what
this movie needs a sequel, it was too brilliant.
A sequel would ruin it
@@Enzo-si1it Batman is a sequel but it wasn’t ruined
@@alislila4296 wow one exception, good one. Sequel ruin the story 99% of the time. And there's nothing more for tenet
It's Tenet, I dont think you could call it a sequel, it would be both prequel sequel.
We feel so much joy when he says “we get up to some stuff” because while the sadness is there- imagine how much fun you would have meeting your best friend on earth with the perspective of all of your time together…and then FINALLY being able to give up the ruse. It’s joy, relief, sorrow, but profound love most of all.
How is it that this video has clearer dialogue than the movie.
The real protagonist was the friend we made along the way.
Please explain
@@nikicarrie4071 There is the meme/cliche of "The real treasure was the friends we made along the way" etc.
I riffed on that, saying that Neil was actually the real protagonist of the whole movie, who was a friend that the protagonist met and teamed up with along the course of the movie.
@@dtape good call
@@nikicarrie4071 Also Neil is the one who arguably has more of a character arc and does more leading of the pivotal moments in the movie, adding up to Neil being more of a protagonist, which this video highlights
Robert Pattinson was the only actor asked to die his hair blonde for the movie. Elizabeth Debicki and her character, Kat were natural blondes. At the beginning of their meeting in Mumbai, Neil asks the protagonist if he would take a woman and a child hostage to which the protagonist replied “if I have to”.
Only 3 people knew that the protagonist would travel to London to “see Kat from afar” : the protagonist, Kat and Max. There is no feasible way Neil would know this if he hadn’t already known what was going to happen/ he was there. Neil has the same accent as Kat, he speaks Estonian like Sator. The main motivation for Kat’s character is her son, Max and guaranteeing his safety. At the end Neil said that he knew the protagonist for far longer than he let on, which would imply the protagonist went back in time and recruited Neil for Tenet so the events in the movie could play out. Priya told the protagonist that he isn’t the only one, there’s a second protagonist travelling in the opposite direction to JDW’s protagonist, the only person doing that is Neil. This whole movie is a temporal pincer, hence every character we see on screen must have some part to play. Therefore, I believe that Neil is Kat’s son who was trained by the protagonist for TENET.
Great theory, and I agree!
Being confined in a container with breathable reverse air and travel back 10 days is tough but practical. Especially when you are going to save the world. But inverting back in time for many years? How practical is that ? There is nothing in the storyline that points to an alternative way.
That is why I am not sure of the 'Neil is Max (Kat's son)' theory.
Even the theory that the protagonist travelled back (to before the movie's events) and recruited a young physics major (who is not Max) will hit the same impracticality.
Is it possible that an older protagonist in future starts Tenet and communicate with a younger Neil (in the past) just like how the future was communicating with Sator?
Is it then likely they actually met each other for the first time in Mumbai while they order Diet Code /Soda Water?
This is my theory for today.
Next week I will come up another one after I move through another temporal pincer.
@@raviom yes, I made a typo/error the protagonist when older trains Neil (I believe is Max) and sends him back in time to the events in TENET can play out!
He says he wouldn't take a child hostage.
Also, Maximilien - neilimixaM Max, Neil, and a palindrome in the middle.
Well, if Neil is actually the son of the main bad guy who's going to destroy the world, that would be a major plot point, and Nolan as a filmmaker wouldn't leave out any major plot points. Cool theory, but no.
* Neil knowing too much for 2 minutes straight *
Neil talks only for 1 minute and 36 seconds
I see he talked for 24 seconds with the opposite entropy
Yes that's probably what happened
the music when Neil first appeared in the movie was on point. For first time viewers, it serves as a proper introduction background music. But for second time viewers, the slight sadness that reveals the character is gonna die at the end emerges along with the music. This is just genius.
Tangent inbound. The way I see Tenet(and movie overall) is as an organization that all members are at different stages of their tenure with every mission being a different loop/cycle for everyone. It's also why I believe that everyone in the organization is the protagonist at one point. Neil and the Protagonist relationship is like a palindrome where ones beginning while another is ending and they're meeting in the middle with the same amount of information. The first time, this is the Protagonist movie and we the audience are along for the ride figuring out their mission, how the world works and trying to get a hang of things. Ultimately, you come to an understanding but you're still missing quite a bit of context and left leaving it up to faith. The second time around, you realize it's Neil's movie and he's the real Protagonist in the sense of this loop/cylce. He is the most informed and confident in his ability to complete this mission because of everything he's already experienced it in a way.
The first I watched the movie I had the same thought: Neil was the real protagonist and the one who saved the present and future
Seems that the flow of time is convoluted; with protagonists phasing in and out. The very fabric wavers, and relations shift and obscure.
Damn it, Neil was such an amazing character. Pattinson's best. Makes me excited for his Batman. Hopefully we get a Tenet 2. Watching TP recruit Neil will be like watching Anakin in the sequel trilogy knowing what happens in the original trilogy. JDW said he would love to come back for another Tenet. The universe is so unique.
Robert Pattinson received the news that he'd been cast as Bruce Wayne in The Batman (2022) on his first day on set shooting this movie. This is an interesting coincidence, as director Christopher Nolan previously made three Batman films: Batman Begins (2005), The Dark Knight (2008), and The Dark Knight Rises (2012).
Interesting indeed!
It was sometimes tense moments between these two. But the ending was sad. I cried a lot.
okay but Rob's acting is ✊🏽❤
Neill is the main character of the whole movie, who went to save the protagonist, knowing that he would die.
I see why he was so sad to introduce himself to the P. That would break the heart of any friend.
Another thing I wanted to mention was:
Neil mentions that he has a masters in physics, so it makes sense that the protagonist hired him (in the future) for this job after his masters in physics.
Tenet was a really good movie, Christopher Nolan never disappoints, his movies are always classics, the use of time was really well done in Tenet, story was great too. John David Washington and Robert Pattinson stole the show with their performances 👏👏👏👏🫡
Btw Neil lives the exact same mission forever since he died in reverse causing him to live a constant loop and having to repeat everything
Your sacrifice won't be forgotten, Neil :(
I mean, not even Robert understood the plot...maybe that's why Neil knows but it hasn't happened yet.
I like how this populates on my TH-cam feed five minutes after I said Robert Pattinson is by far the best part of this movie.
Aka the best and most, and only interesting, character in this movie. We need a Neil solo movie
At first I thought the same but later I realised that that would kind of cheapen this movie and feel on the nose.
TP sator and kat were interesting too
This concept along with inception could be explored so much more, I would love to see a series for it
I loved this movie. Partly because it was unique and challenging to understand, partly because of the soundtrack.
For those theorising about Neil being Kat’s son - I’ve been thinking more and more about this little idea I had recently, expanding the canon of Tenet so to speak. What if Tenet’s most trusted and secret operatives are given the option of a “new life” (they’re only told that they will never be physically able to return to their old life). This choice turns out to be a debt of inversion time - far enough back that no matter what you do, you’ll never reach the day you inverted in the first place. These operatives end up being the most deeply embedded Tenet agents (as they’ve travelled back further than nearly anyone) and all will die in their own “past”. I personally think Neil made this choice after being urged to by The Protagonist (10-15 years down the line when Neil is a young man, freshly recruited into Tenet). Along his way back through time he has some stop offs and some “good times” getting up to “some stuff” with The Protagonist so ultimately he doesn’t pay his inversion debt (dying only 10-15 years into his inversion - which is a possibility of the job).
I’m sure I’m missing plenty that would mean this idea doesn’t really work for whatever reason but I thought it was interesting.
Interesting.There isn't really much proof that correlates to this so I can't vouch for its credibility but I like your take on it
I like the idea
There’s zero proof of this so give it up
@@BruceWayne-zj1kw I never claimed there was. It’s literally just head-canon I made up to add a little intrigue to the discussion surrounding Neil.
im confused as is lol
"Does your head hurt yet?"
"Yes"
the way neil goes back in at the end. amazing movie
I love Tenet so much bro, same applies to the protagonist and Neil 🔥
One of my favorite short clips on TH-cam, for some reason
This scene with Robert pattinson and music is just so eerie and amazing... When I finished this movie my opinion of Pattinson changed completely and I have no dobt he will kill in Batman, great job
dude had been fantastic in like at least 5 movies before he did Tenet. Still surprising to me that some people still just consider him the dude from Twilight.
Neil grew up knowing he saved the world and the person who saved his mom
he didnt know
It's interesting to see how different perspectives people have on Max being the Neil's younger version.
Some look at it from a logical point of view.
Some look at it from a emotional point of view.
While I'm an emotionally driven individual as well but I'm also from filmmaking, and I assure people seeing it from emotional point of view to not define Neil's calmness towards her mom being shot (even if she is actually) as the proof of Neil not being his son. It's pretty evident that Neil all along knew her mother is going to be saved. He trusts on time. The time they are going to travel backwards in the airport scene. The calmness was also due to the fact that there are not many close-up shots of Neil which will give you the slightest expression or even pain in eyes as what it's being said. But it is Neil who took care of Kat more than protagonist. So, emotional individuals, even if you're putting forward that Neil seems to don't care about his mother, then don't go on what is represented (he being calm and ignorant), rather go on what is being done (he taking care of her and concerned that protagonist must succeed so everyone's saved, including his mom).
Personal theory to emotional individuals: when you tend to grow up and become mature, a healthy individual (no mental disorders and disturbances in function) always approach situations with rather more subtlety in gestures, attentive in required actions while also being fully expressive as well at moments. You're not going out of emotional charge, rather you're more aware of the situation and your present surroundings.
Moreover, how Neil not panicking about her mom being shot seems totally irrelevant to what journey Neil have with protagonist after movie ends, because theory proves that Neil lead a happy life with protagonist as well as his mother until he goes backwards in time. He's aware of what's going to happen.
Me: I’m about to watching Tenet
Me: watching Tenet
Me: I can’t wait for Tenet to be released
Lol
Robert Pattinson has aged well!
This is one of the best third watch movies I’ve ever seen
Neil is the protagonist
You know too much..
Me: Yeah, cus he's fucking Batman !
1:03 he knew that because he remembers when he was a little boy
Since he gets recruited 10-15 years from now, he could've just found out about from the protagonist. Also, it was on the same day as the opera siege so there's that...
Imagine in a future mission, with the Protagonist recruiting Neil, there's a situation where if Neil sacrificed himself he could save a bunch of ppl but the Protagonist can't let him do it, no matter who it might save, bc the fate of the world depends on it?
We just watched the last movie of Bolan’s new trilogy
Maybe xD
Also in the Tallinn car chase
Protagonist: I know that its not plutonium!
Neil: It's something worse!
Donnie Darko: im the hardest movie to understand!
Inception: Hold my beer!
Tenet: Beer my hold!
Lol
"Im Neil…from the future."
Neil is an anagram for line, the thread that guides the protagonist and ties the story together.
Damn it was such a good movie.
Agreed
@@Player-kg1ds This is purely just for jokes, but image a nolanverse 😂😂
@@Menagerie_OS Cobb: I'd like to talk to you about the T.I.M.E initiative.
If they ever do a tenet part 2, its going to be even more confusing n im all for it
He is the best character after the protagonist.. hat's off
Neil is the best character, period. At least he is for me.
Kat: I want ensure the best future for my son
Neal: You already have, Mom
Kat: Thanks...wait a min
1:10 « How do you know about that ? »
Because he already went there! I first thought that Neil went to the opera after the Stalsk-12 battle but it turns out he already saved TP by the time all 3 are on the boat!
Who else thinks Denzel should play the future Protagonist when he recruits Neil?
Cool idea but I doubt there'll be a sequel
This movie is awesome. And Pattinson is the best of this generation
Because Washinton was the one who actually recruited Neil after Neil dies in the end. Neil never recruited Washington here. He never recruited him, period. They meet up for the first time after the film takes place, and Neil is much younger, while Washington is much older. He knows Neil saved his life at the end of the film by sacrificing himself. (What better guy to recruit????) And since Washington knows everything about this entire universe after the end of the film, of course, he recruits a younger Neil.. (Neil sacrificed himself to save his life, so who better to trust!!!!), and due to this, they're obviously going to be REAL REAL close.
Kat: Hey you're pretty cute. Got a girlfriend?
Neal: 😳
0:21 hahahaha this movie is just neil knowing too much and the protagonist not knowing anything
Exactly lol
Yeap. Is like neil is the real protagonist
Tenet NEEDS to be a trilogy.
Was Neil literally that school kid?
He was seriously concerned about saving 'moms' life after that gunshot wound. Makes sense watching 2nd time around.
He might be. Although this theory doesn't make 100% sense, there's a lot of evidence that points towards it. I personally believe that he was that kid.
@@Player-kg1ds me too. I'm gonna give it one more go later. Neil was my favourite character by far.
"Not going to London to check on Kat, are ya?"
"Not even from afar?"
Only 3 people are there who survived the Climax-London scene who knew The Protagonist checked out Kat from afar.
Kat, The Protagonist and ..........
@@Player-kg1ds What doesn't make sense about it if I may ask?
yes and also the old man that protagonist goes after in the beggining, this old neil dies in the end.
This man is so omniscient, I Love it
Does your head hurt yet 😏😂😂😂
I get this feeling that if Nolan makes a sequel for TeneT it will be on the level of legendary status as Aliens and Terminator 2
Neil's the true player 1
When Washington gets mad he sounds exactly like his father
Let us pray that Nolan would make a prequel of their friendship!
Don't try to FEEL it, UNDERSTAND it.
I've been trying to for a very long time
Robert Paterson did a good performance in this movie !!!
The most mind blowing thing about this movie?
Max=Neil....
So essentially the protagonist is saving his saver ....
The most mind blowing thing is when neil's mind was blown (literally).
He is Maximilien grown up
"You've known me for years."
"We get up to some stuff... you're gonna love it."
rewatching Tenet and noticing all these moments is one of the best cinematic experiences
*did you talk*
Robert Pattinson was Better than the protagonist Acting and Character and Personality, He should have been the Main Character
"2 minutes straight". you shortchanged us by 25 seconds.
Neil is Andre sator's son
Let that sink in
-How did you know I was at the opera house 10 days ago.
-I was there saving your ass. Only you haven't noticed yet
Nothing against John David Washington, but I think I would have enjoyed this movie a lot more of Neil was the main character.
"You're well informed "
Wow,he sounded just like his dad saying that line!