"you should play the sicilian, it's so much fun, no need to learn any theory" but also "here's 5 different ways either side can lose instantly unless you are familiar with this particular line/tactic/pattern.''
Sicilian aside, if you aren't familiar with tactical patterns, openings are the least of your problems. People that work on tactical patterns aren't the ones that lose instantly. They make those who don't work on tactical patterns lose instantly.
@@yzfool6639 I would argue even if you don't know tactical patterns (which to be honest it takes a long time), sicilian is a great choice to play for the win, imbalanced positions and has a lot of different pawn structures.
I'm an e4 player and I hated playing against the sicilian until one day I just said screw it and started playing the open sicilian. Now I love playing against the sicilian
I don’t know more than the first 12 moves of any Sicilian line for white and can confirm that the problem is not black knowing 18 moves theory but black knowing 4 move tactics better than me.
I picked up the open Sicilians rather than anti-sicilians after going through the best games of every famous player from 1950-2000 and realized that more than half of them were from either the white or black side of the open Sicilian. Inspirational chess!
You may be "only" an IM in playing strength but you are a super grandmaster 2800+ in chess teachings. Literally the best of the web, i especially like your videos on chess psychology and attack. I jumped from my plateau 1600 to 1800 playing strength in about one month!! Thank you very much :)
I never get more excited about a chess game than when entering the Open Sicilian as either white or black. I hope this inspires more people to learn it!
I'm afraid I don't quite follow the logic 00:00 - 05:00 You don't need to know theory 5:00-7:00 Anyway here are some quick wins I scored when my opponent didn't know the theory 07:00-09:00 Here's some ultra specific theory in one of hundreds of possible lines in the Open Sicilian you can use to avoid this happening to you
@@ChessCoachAndras Thanks for the clarification. So when you adopt the Open Sicilian, expect to lose your fair share of games at first...perhaps this is the biggest barrier for most amateur players.
I've always been intimidated by the Sicilian, more by it's reputation than the opening itself. But I have to say that I've never had a boring game playing the open Sicilian. After watching this I think perhaps it's time I properly incorporated it in my repertoire.
Thank you for this! I was a Grand Prix & closed Sicilian player. Why? Because I was worried about all the theory. And I ended up learning a large amount of theory anyway! After going the possible systems for white in open Sicilian, I realized it's not that hard at all! You need to know a few main set ups and what the plan is and then just play good tactical chess. And boy are you right! The open Sicilian is so much FUN! It's actually more aggessive than the Grand Prix. Especially with 0-0-0, and then hurtling your g and h pawns at the enemy king. It's a fast attack! This is more exciting than my closed Sicilian was.
Back in 1972 when I was a 1400-ish player I saw a black win in the Sicilian Dragon in Chess Life magazine that caught my attention. I bought David Levy's book on the Dragon and went through it from cover to cover. Because of Fischer's influence in the US, 1. e4 was by far the most common move, and 2. Nf3 and 3. d4 was the most popular way of meeting the Sicilian. Pretty soon I was trouncing B players, had a plus score against A players, and even drew a few Experts. Twenty years later I renewed my interest in chess and expected that a quick Dragon refresh would keep the winning ways going. Unfortunately, I found myself playing everything but open Sicilians; Alapin, Grand Prix Attack, 3. Bb5+, Closed, KIA, even the Smith-Morra gambit. I stopped playing in tournaments in 2002 but still play at a club. Except for a few 5-minute games, I can't remember the last time I got to play an open Sicilian.
I've played the Sicilian as black ever since I was a beginner and every game is a new bunch of discoveries. Except for the boring grand prix and closed sicilian ones. A truly instructive opening for both colors !
as a fan of the Open Sicilian this is my new favourite video of yours! Recently I've mainly been playing the Najdorf and I currently have a 65% win rate with it... never ever would I go back to playing 1e4 ...e5 or the French
@@ChessCoachAndras thank YOU! I started playing Bc4 vs the Najdorf when I saw this game for example :) www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1487929 I have to compare to your line now. I am 2000 ish on lichess and mostly I just know a few moves/plans as white and it always works out. ie if I lose I lose because I mess up, not because my opponent "knew theory". Also we have to remember that Black also doesn't know the main lines because White rarely goes for them anyway. The Open Sicilian is paradoxically a sideline at amateur levels , so I can have my cake and eat it too.
@@ChessCoachAndras you should make another video about playing the main lines vs the French. Like why should I exchange on d5 or play some weird Tarrasch or something like that? Why not just go for Nc3 etc and go for it? Black also doesn't know everything about the Winawer, they're also winging it :))
Thank you for making this video it helped me get over my fear of the Sicilian and now I love playing it as White and Black! So often you hear people saying to avoid the Sicilian because it's too heavy, but frankly there's so much juice to be squeezed out of the opening that my opponents are often completely out of prep by move 5-7 and we just play a razor sharp game!
Im a 1300 player and am sick of the ruy lopez/ italian, center game against white I dislike the caro its boring Same with french, scandanavian is wild, its a coin toss between the two
Are there 4 or 5 Sicilian miniatures you'd recommend memorizing so instead of disconnected opening lines there's memorable storylines, structures and themes? I did that with the King's gambit years ago and those stuck with me even though I've forgotten everything else about it. It might make a cool video series.
I recommend checking out Judit Polgar's videos on her sicilian games against other great players, you can find them on youtube and they're amazing. Helped me to understand the ideas in the opening.
@@tiagomoraes1510 ok i know im 8 months overdue, but i also learned the king's gambit and had relative success with it before switching to the ruy, and here is how i learned it: -i looked up the theory on youtube (look up hanging pawns, they have great opening theory vids) -looked up and analysed as many romantic games (think Anderssen, Morphy, Greco etc.) as possible from agadmator -logged the info into a lichess study along with common traps -analysed my own games and logged them into said lichess study (opinion: play the king's bishop gambit, its much easier than king's knight gambit even though your king ends up on f1) thats it, have a great day!
12:59 there is a cool line here with each side sacking a queen if instead of 0-0-0 white plays the early e5. A tough one but i would heavily recommend playing it out on a board because of how nice it is. it goes: 1. e5 Bb7 2. exd6 Bxd6 3. Qe3 Bc5 4. 0-0-0 Nc6 5. Qxe6+! fxe6 6. Nxe6 Qe7 7. Rhe1 Qxe6! 8. Rxe6 Ne7 9. Rde1 0-0-0[] There are about 6 more moves of trades and what not but this simplifies down to a drawn 2 rooks endgame. beautiful line. you really do see these all over the place in the Sicilian, sometimes there are straight up piece sacks that are still considered book moves, like in the traditional Bg5 line with Bd3 theres 12. Nd5 which just straight up throws a knight in front of a pawn.
This video was so refreshing. I am currently a beginner but the open sicilian is my favourite opening with the white and the black pieces, especially the Najdorf. When you play the sicilian as black, you declare you're not looking for equality - you're playing for a win with the black pieces. When you play the open sicilian as white, you accept black's challenge. It's a sharp, double-edged opening which takes nerves and the willingness to take risks, that's why it's so awesome and generates some of the most beautiful attacking games. Sidelines like the alapin and closed sicilian just aren't the same... I think especially the alapin is a very awkward version of the sicilian. (Judit Polgar has a great series on her sicilian games and she's a beast with the white and the black pieces. Highly recommend it.)
The smith morra is just way more fun in my opinion. If you win with the smith morra you had an amazing attacking game and destroyed black, and it lowers the winning chances of black because it's your own game now. If you play 2. Nf3 looking for an open sicilian black can play a TON of options like d6 Nc6 e6 a6 g6 Nf6 and even some crap like f5 and you have to study everything! And for example if your opponents play 3...d6 then after d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 there is e6, a6, Nc6, g6 and a ton more.
@@itayn6422 I think the smith morra can be a fun opening and it's similar to the open sicilian but the open sicilian is just way cooler and way more interesting. It has aggressive, attacking qualities like the smith morra but is much more solid and methodical. A lot of open sicilian lines are far more aggressive than the smith morra because you can go for queenside castling and pawn storm on the kingside. This is something you would never see in the smith morra because you weakened your queenside by sacrificing the c pawn, so you are definitely going to castle kingside, and also your knight is blocking your f pawn. (In the smith morra you would never get to play e4, f4, g4 in the opening but there are lines like that in the open sicilian.)
@@itayn6422 The reason you give for playing the smith morra is basically "because black won't know what to do against it". But what if they do know what to do against it and then you are just playing a pawn down with questionable compensation? There are a tonne of successful lines black can play against the smith morra or lines to annoy you. Like what if you play 3. c3 and black plays 3. ...d3? It's like with any opening. You are basically dependent on your opponent playing into the line to get the opening you want. White just developed the open sicilian because it's better. There are several successful lines white can play against each of the black responses e6, a6, g6, nf6, etc. varying from aggressive and tactical to slow and strategic. That's what makes it way more fun and interesting than playing the same gambit every time and hoping the opponent falls into a trap. All of these openings you're talking about came from the open sicilian in the first place.
@@freetheorcas8509 I think coordinating my pieces to attack is more fun than throwing your pawns at the king (which I also enjoy as an e4 player agains the pirc for example) and a lot of the times in the morra we attack him before he castles.
@@freetheorcas8509 You think I play the morra because black doesn't know what to play against it? If you think that smith morra is only tricks and traps you clearly don't know anything about it. Also when my opponents play 3...d3 it's not annoying lol, you play Nf3 c4 Nc3 and eventually recapture the pawn and you have a big advantage, it's basically a better maroczy bind, and you're not even down a pawn. Please don't think that the Morra is only tricks and traps, I suggest that you go look at that.
Suggestion : organize an open-sicilian themed rapid tournament with the ChessDojo, and play in it. Maybe get one of the Senseis in as well (I believe Kostya coauthored a book on the open sicilian and plays the Taimanov as his main repertoire), and make some kind of friendly bet between the two top dogs. Get the masses playing 3.d4!!!
As a very beginner player that had only learned a bit of d4 openings, I don't understand a lot of this, like what are anti-sicilian moves for example, but I love your energy and passion. Great video
I really like the Classical Sicilian. The mainline Bg5 Rauzer has some Najdorf like crazyness. But it is also the only critical line, so very practical. Maybe the Sozin is also critical but not that hard. Most of the other lines in the open classical you can play a dragon like setup without white having the Yugoslav attack and the Anti-Sicilians in the Classical move order are pretty easy.
@12:53 I switched from Najdorf to Classical because I kept facing Bc4 attacks and it drives you nuts as black in bullet when you have to many threats to properly evaluate in the time and have to move. Instead of castles I have also tried Nd5. If Bxe7 Nxe7 which is fine. If exd5 Bxg5+, Kb1, exd5, Bxd5, 0-0. Seems a little better than straight up castling. But white still has a massive attack and Black has undeveloped pieces, coupled with a loose bishop. (Not the position with the queen on c7, sorry the position if queen on d8 and Nd7 played and white O-O-O.)
I've always been an e4 player and just starting to explore the whole openings universe. I was going to start with the Italian game since that's the first one I learned and the only one I know. I'm totally sold on learning the open Sicilian and theory doesn't scare me. I estimate my rating to be somewhere between 800-1200. I got the Chessable Short and Sweet Open Sicilian course by Ivan Saric. Look forward to starting it! - Thanks for giving me some direction!
I finally took the plunge-on both sides of the board! I’ve put the Petrov on hold for the Accelerated Dragon and I’m loving it. And I’ve set the Smith Morra aside for a full Open repertoire. What a wide world 😮 Won my first game against the Taimanov using the Qf3 idea and it felt great! It’s great to play both sides of something for once, something I can’t often do with the Petrov.
I've been primarily playing the Smith-Morra (with guidance from Marc Esserman's book) for about a year now, and it'll always have a special place in my heart as one of the things to get me back into chess, but you're absolutely right -- the Open Sicilian consistently produces unbelievable games. My main response to 1. e4 is the Najdorf, so I'm terribly well acquainted with how insane proper Sicilian attacks can get, haha. I'm going to start reincorporating the Open into my White repertoire now that I'm better equipped for its positions. The thing I miss most about playing 1...e5 is the Marshall Attack :(
I've been playing the closed Sicilian as white all this time. That's gonna change. I've also always played 1. e4 e5 as black hoping for a marshall attack against RL. I'm going to pick up the dragon now!
@@ChessCoachAndras It's a very unique accent your pronunciations are really interesting haha. I don't think you're butchering it at all. It makes the videos really engaging. Btw I'm a fan of Simon Williams. Is the b4 wing gambit really that bad? Simon makes a very strong case for it in his gambits course. I find at my level especially it's a very practical weapon.
Andras- I thought you might be interested in my experience with the Sicilian. I am about 1900, Australian Chess Federation not internet, and took up the Sveshnikov in 1985 and learned it in excessive depth. You say this opening is good for positional players and I count myself as one. I found studying and playing this opening good for my chess especially as it really helped me develop the dynamic part of my game. My experience was also that I played far more anti-sicilians than open sicilians. If I got to use my sveshnikov at all it was normally only once.
@@ChessCoachAndras I had chosen to write about the Sicilian before I found this video, because of how awesome and iconic it is but your video has provided me with some great quotes to use and helped me articulate how truly great the Sicilian is. Thank you!!!
I am playing open Sicilian as white in every line but 1. Against 2. ...Nc6 I like playing Rossolimo. I play Ruy Lopez against 1. ...e5 so at the start I wanted to give Rossolimo a chance as well (I know it is not really a good reasoning, but that is just how I started playing it). For some reason, I am comfortable playing it and I actually have a pretty good record in that line. I find that to be a nice variety to my game as well. And as I play 1. ...c5 as black, I get my fair share of open Sicilians from both sides, so I think playing Rossolimo along with open Sicilians is not bad for my learning experience. :)
If only there were some overview videos on TH-cam on the Open Sicilian. Where do we go to get a nice overview of White's options (of which there are many)? Because there's a lot of content out there on the gambits (Morra and Wing, etc.), and Danya is a huge proponent of the Alapin and Shrantz shows the deadly traps of the Delayed Alapin. But I can hardly find one video even laying out the basic choices for white in the Open. I'd love to see an overview to "see what I'm buying" so to speak. For now, I've been having tons of fun with the Morra but I'm looking to my longevity in chess and starting to browse around. So far, I'm curious about the Alapin, or Rossolimo combined with Delayed Alapin (if they play 2...d6). But I'd be open to going straight for the sharpest/soundest lines in the Open if only I could get a nice overview. The thing is: Lines like the Alapin just score so much better, even up to Grandmaster level sometimes. The opening simply punishes black if they try to go for their typical Sicilian setups.
What Andras is really saying in this video, it that he likes the positions that come from the open variation of the Sicilian defence more than positions that come from some other openings. It's totally fine to be just another guy with an opinion, it is less fine to impose your opinion on others and to act as if you are morally right and people who disagree with you are morally wrong. I personally wouldn't play 1. f3 e5 2. Kf2 as White. In fact, I play the open Sicilian myself. But if someone does play that, if it brings them enjoyment, if they win with those opening moves, they have about the same right to call 1. f3 e5 2. Kf2 the best opening in existence, and call the open Sicilian a total rubbish as vice versa. And 1. f3 e5 2. Kf2 was played on every level mind you. GM Williams won a classical game with it in the 1999 British championship, and GM Carlsen used it to beat GM So in game 1 of the 2020 Banter blitz finals.
problem is that now at my level (around 1350 Lichess) nobody plays c5 against 1. e4 because all those big YT channel say not to. And when you play on the black side they go on some wierd closed stuff. I was one of them but i decided to stop. Thanks a lot for your changing my mind Andras! Edit: now at 1650 and everybody plays Bc4 stuff against e6 Sicilian
I also switched recently from BLK side Caro Kann which I have played for years to the Sicilian Kan. And find the Sicilian games for Blk are much more wild. It's good to have both choices. I can slow things down with the solid Caro or play aggressive with Sicilian Kan!
I tried Sicilian as a kid. I do not like the idea that I lose if I am a tempo too slow or make one inaccuracy in a sharp position. I've been playing caro kann for years now but the position may become boring depending on how white decides to play. Ideally there would be some sweet spot between sicilian and caro kann. Thoughts?
I'm wondering the same. I figure the answer is E5, but a lot of those games look very closed and exhausting. I thought about picking up the Accelerated Dragon msyelf. I enjoy Queen's Gambit as white, so you'd think Caro-Kann would be a good complimenting opening, but Caro-Kann positions look so boring. If you figure something out, let me know. :)
@@Krisenaa Caro kann is not boring in itself. It's that white most often chooses boring lines. I recommend chessable's Lifetime Repertoire on Caro kann - Erwin l'Ami did a great job providing interesting lines. It's not always dull, I scored some great attacking wins with black because white did play fun lines and overextended. Get it? Caro kann and attacking chess lol. But it can happen, as Andras pointed out people avoid fascinating lines, mostly because they are more difficult. 1. e4 e5 is certainly an option but here there is so much to learn, especially that I have nevered played e5 in my carrer. I am an adult imrover, I do not have tons of time to study so that restricts me in my opening choice. However, e5 seems to be the best alternative.
Some Sicilian variations are more positional than others. I was looking into the Taimanov and Four Knights Sicilian by studying best vs common play using the Lichess database at my rating range. (That's how I shop for openings.) They perform very, very well up to the 2200 Lichess rating, and have natural, flexible development. The Accelerated Dragon is also a strong contender, in my opinion. Caro Kann can be cramped or abstract. But maybe that's to your taste. I've rarely found it to be the "solid, positional" opening people claim it is. I'm sure Sicilian players like to joke, why play c3 when you'll play c4 later, and you could have played c4 right away?!
Great video. I've tried to jump to the Sicilian a few times, but at my level, I never get to play the Sicilian (as black). I have to play against anti-Sicilians almost exclusively, which takes a bit of the fun out. Edit: great point on (not) knowing theory and avoiding the sicilian because of it. Your opponent very likely doesn't either. It's so important to remember you're playing chess, not the sicilian, French, etc. as I believe you've pointed out elsewhere. My coach has pointed out times where I've played 'theory' i.e. memorized moves that didn't really fit the position.
Extra bonus, you can play the Hedgehog out of a Sicilian if it looks good. Love watching white try to break it too early and get creamed by the counterplay.
THANKYOU SOO MUCH! dear coach, do you think you would enjoy a video you look and analyze in detail , tactical sicilian games that you have a liking for? for more inspiration to us noobs love the work regardless! keep em coming baby
I want to learn this super cool 6.Bc4 Najdorf (I have always played 6.Be2 🤢) so do you recommend even for club level players without a coach to keep a file and try to develop it over time with analysis and engine work? I kind of worry trusting myself and not a stronger player’s analysis in a book or something.
Yes. In fact, up to a certain level, you don't really need a file. I don't keep files, I just hope I remember most of it. And doing such independent analysis as a whole is exceptionally useful. My understanding of all the openings I've studied has dramatically increased thanks to me having to work out the details on my own rather than just regurgitating a Chessable course. And some of the sidelines I've chosen are slightly unusual as a result, and my justifications for them are extremely specific.
Sir I totally agree but still there is too much theory, I am a caro player(who is tired of the boring positional games) but still sicillian is too theoretical so I will start playing sicillian when I am at least 1500 fide (currently 1156) till then I plan to improve on my tactics, positional play and endgame. I would have learned sicillian if I was a london player but I play e4... And u know against sicillian I play Grand prix which I dont think is boring right?
Grand Prix is not necessarily boring but falls into the category of "why would you do that to yourself??" You do realise that certain Sicilian lines require infinitely less theory than the Caro-Kann?!
@@Rohan-xc3kl Think about it. As a Caro Kann Player you need to Know main line Nc3, also Nf3 Nc3, Panov attack, Advanced , and exchange variations too! Learning the Accelerated Dragon, I reckon is far less.....
@@ChessCoachAndras Yes accelerated dragon is a Gr8 opening and u know I was going to learn it when I will become 1500, I may get some problems in maroczy bind, can u suggest some ways to handle that? 😁😁
You could just play the Classical Sicilian as the theory is very low and Black is fine and has an easy game in everything except 6. Bg5 but even at my level of 2000 online people never play it so I guess you’d be fine
andreas guess what? I thought about your advice and now i have started playing the accelerated dragon via the hyper accelerated dragon move order to avoid the rossolimo its very interesting opening i love it perfect for me now i play both caro and sicillian accelerated dragon
"why would you avoid the open Sicilian" To play against it correctly, i need to know every variation my opponent might use against me. To play it against me correctly, my opponent needs to know ONE variation I don't know.
Also yeah I don't know anti Sicilian theory but the difference between my knowledge of open and anti, vs the difference between my opponent's knowledge of their preferred variation and anti is probably very big
You mentioned the Kan variation for some type of players (positional?). I'm not good at tactics (but try to be better). Is the Kan even then a good choice for me. (I'm 1700 Lichess classic).
As white how many variants do I have to learn/study as a starter? (I'm talking about games at 1700 lever Lichess classic). Are there some generic setup for white?
I'm a lower rated player learning sicilian. I've learned there are lots of different ways of playing against each sicilian, but there are a few general setups to be familiar with, hope this simplifies it a bit: English/Yugoslav attack type setups - "Be3, f3, Qd2, 0-0-0, (g4, h4, etc.)" Maroczy bind setups - "e4, c4" Fischer-Sozin attack - "Bc4" Richter-Rauzer/Classical Najdorf - "Bg5, f4, Qd2/Qf3, 0-0-0" Classical setups - "Be2, Be3, 0-0" Fianchetto setups - "g3, Bg2"
I would not say it is unfortunate. It was inevitable. With open Sicilian a course that has 150 trainables would have turned into one with 700. Simply there was no other way.
@@ChessCoachAndras Of course this attitude towards the amount of trainable positions is a respectable one. One of my first 1e4 reps (by Sam Collins, Batsford) was also choosing the Alapin. Good work, master Toth!
@ChessCoachAndras Why is the open considered white's best response when even grandmasters win more with the Rossolimo and Stockfish gives them the same evaluation? (I know black can also play 2.d6 to avoid it, and I understand the limitations of engines in the opening phase). Do you think it's simply because even grandmasters haven't fully explored how to counter the Rossolimo? Regardless, I think the main reason you vouch for aspiring players to learn the Open is for them to truly participate in chess history, play dynamic imbalanced games and learn a lot (from which there are so many historic games to study). So I totally get that.
@@bruhifysbackup By what means, by whom, to what depth? I would think all Sicilians are draws at the most extreme depths, unless 2...c5 is slightly, slightly dubious.I guess 3...d6 is also a bit better at the highest levels, too. But by my original point, I would imagine that the Rossolimo also simply has more unexplored territory. Anyways, I think I'm more keen on playing the Open the more I think about it, not only to participate in chess history but also because I'm more attacking/tactically minded. Currently, my only weapon is the Smith Morra.
@@marcofrey2903 Well, if we think in your perspective, there are three evals: Win with best play, holdable/draw with best play, loss with best play. And I agree with that, and also I wanted to try the open but I realised that there were way too much things that black could do like: e4 c5 Nf3) a6,b6,Nc6,Qc7,d6,e6,g6, even h6 and a lot more branching after Nf3 and also with best play these moves shouldn't create enough weaknesses to be considered winning for one side, heck engines say Czech Benoni is worse than h6 Sicilian, like what?
Hey coach! Great video! I actually stopped playing the Sicilian as Black because I found out most of my opponents would actually reel out some boring anti sicilian against me. I never knew what to do and I hated it. Dropped the entire opening as a result. What's your advice to Black players facing so many Anti lines?
Stick through it and climb up the rating ladder. Eventually you'll reach a rating of opponents that respect themselves and openly engage in the open Sicilian with you.
I just switched from Scandi to Sicilian (encouraged by the Amateur's Mind rant on openings. Like, video 3 or 5 in the series). Just decided to start playing it in my games and, boy, is it ever so much sharper than anything the Scandi ever gives you... Definitely going to be "investing in loss" for quite some time there.
I used to be a big Qd8 Scandi fan. Never played it in anything serious, but had fun w/it & Icelandic/Portuguese gambits. Now I pretty much exclusively play the Kan Sicilian. Highly recommend! :)
If you look at the Lichess player database, the anti sicilians score better than the open Sicilian. Most players have an anti Sicilian. I used to play the Sveschnikov Sicilian and rarely got it. The solid 10 Bxf6 line in the Sveschnikov has a large 64% draw rate in the Lichess master database. The exchange French isn't any worse really. As white I played 2. c3 Alapin and had good results. The Rossolimo is a good opening too. If you look at other openings besides Sicilians, e.g., Scandanavian Portuguese, Caro Kann advanced 3. ...c5, or French Poisoned Pawn Winawer -- Black scores *more* (better than white and better than open Sicilians) in the Lichess database. White often has a pet line (Wing gambits, Smith Morra, etc etc) v Sicilians, less so v anything else. How many club players have a pet line v Alekhine or 2. ...Nf6 Scandi? Recently I've been playing French and I notice white often over extends. A routine move and whites d4-e5 structure can be put under a lot of pressure. See Jonathon Schranz's youtube video: Easy Wins with the French Defense | The Power of the Blueprint. And even if you do get an open Sicilian and get your opening -- white can play almost anything and they're fine. g3 -- sure. f3 English attack, ya that's good too. Bc4 that's a line. Bg5, ya that's another line. f4 another.
Okay Coach fair enough... want us to play open Sicilian, we'll play open Sicilian...but do a nice, detailed, lengthy series so we can finally move out of our comfort zones of playing the delayed Alapin and Closed Sicilian....
It's true: There's a lot of content out there on the gambits against Sicilian (Morra and Wing, etc.), and Danya is a huge proponent of the Alapin and Shrantz shows the deadly traps of the Delayed Alapin. But I can hardly find one video even laying out the basic choices for white in the Open Sicilian (of which there are many). I'd love to see an overview to "see what I'm buying" so to speak. For now, I've been having tons of fun with the Morra but I'm looking to my longevity in chess and starting to browse around. So far, I'm curious about the Alapin, or Rossolimo combined with Delayed Alapin (if they play 2...d6). But I'd be open to going straight for the sharpest/soundest lines in the Open if only I could get a nice overview. The thing is: Lines like the Alapin just score so much better, even up to Grandmaster level sometimes. The opening simply punishes black if they try to go for their typical Sicilian setups.
I feel like people who avoid the open sicil are fearful of losing. Even though the sicillian is one of the most double edged openings in all of chess. The better player truly wins.
"you should play the sicilian, it's so much fun, no need to learn any theory" but also "here's 5 different ways either side can lose instantly unless you are familiar with this particular line/tactic/pattern.''
Point is, the other guy probably doesn’t know either.
U learn that way...u should expose urself to danger
I mean, every opening has the same lines of opening mistakes.
Sicilian aside, if you aren't familiar with tactical patterns, openings are the least of your problems. People that work on tactical patterns aren't the ones that lose instantly. They make those who don't work on tactical patterns lose instantly.
@@yzfool6639 I would argue even if you don't know tactical patterns (which to be honest it takes a long time), sicilian is a great choice to play for the win, imbalanced positions and has a lot of different pawn structures.
I'm an e4 player and I hated playing against the sicilian until one day I just said screw it and started playing the open sicilian. Now I love playing against the sicilian
What did you used to play? For reference, what's your rating?
Every video has a better thumbnail than the previous one, that's crazy
Phunkyt is a thumbnail god!
I don’t know more than the first 12 moves of any Sicilian line for white and can confirm that the problem is not black knowing 18 moves theory but black knowing 4 move tactics better than me.
I have been playing for 60 years, never played Open Sicilian, but i am going to start now. Thanks for the inspiration and the starter guide
I picked up the open Sicilians rather than anti-sicilians after going through the best games of every famous player from 1950-2000 and realized that more than half of them were from either the white or black side of the open Sicilian. Inspirational chess!
chad sicilian energy over here
Wow, I didn't realise how fun and exciting the sicilian can be!
You may be "only" an IM in playing strength but you are a super grandmaster 2800+ in chess teachings. Literally the best of the web, i especially like your videos on chess psychology and attack. I jumped from my plateau 1600 to 1800 playing strength in about one month!! Thank you very much :)
Thanks mate, really appreciate this.
@@PoornaChandra-du1jw Yes
I never get more excited about a chess game than when entering the Open Sicilian as either white or black. I hope this inspires more people to learn it!
I'm afraid I don't quite follow the logic
00:00 - 05:00 You don't need to know theory
5:00-7:00 Anyway here are some quick wins I scored when my opponent didn't know the theory
07:00-09:00 Here's some ultra specific theory in one of hundreds of possible lines in the Open Sicilian you can use to avoid this happening to you
YOu need theory. YOu dont need theory to START playing certain things. YOu will learn on the way. I agree though that it is somewhat confusing!
@@ChessCoachAndras Thanks for the clarification. So when you adopt the Open Sicilian, expect to lose your fair share of games at first...perhaps this is the biggest barrier for most amateur players.
@@lou-e-303 Yes, you are 100% correct.
😂 best comment ever...
I just started dabbling in the Sicilian. Thanks for such an inspirational and fun showcase of the Sicilian!
I've always been intimidated by the Sicilian, more by it's reputation than the opening itself. But I have to say that I've never had a boring game playing the open Sicilian. After watching this I think perhaps it's time I properly incorporated it in my repertoire.
Good idea! Report back how it goes!
Thank you for this! I was a Grand Prix & closed Sicilian player. Why? Because I was worried about all the theory. And I ended up learning a large amount of theory anyway!
After going the possible systems for white in open Sicilian, I realized it's not that hard at all! You need to know a few main set ups and what the plan is and then just play good tactical chess. And boy are you right! The open Sicilian is so much FUN! It's actually more aggessive than the Grand Prix. Especially with 0-0-0, and then hurtling your g and h pawns at the enemy king. It's a fast attack!
This is more exciting than my closed Sicilian was.
Back in 1972 when I was a 1400-ish player I saw a black win in the Sicilian Dragon in Chess Life magazine that caught my attention. I bought David Levy's book on the Dragon and went through it from cover to cover. Because of Fischer's influence in the US, 1. e4 was by far the most common move, and 2. Nf3 and 3. d4 was the most popular way of meeting the Sicilian. Pretty soon I was trouncing B players, had a plus score against A players, and even drew a few Experts. Twenty years later I renewed my interest in chess and expected that a quick Dragon refresh would keep the winning ways going. Unfortunately, I found myself playing everything but open Sicilians; Alapin, Grand Prix Attack, 3. Bb5+, Closed, KIA, even the Smith-Morra gambit. I stopped playing in tournaments in 2002 but still play at a club. Except for a few 5-minute games, I can't remember the last time I got to play an open Sicilian.
If the Sicilian opening ever needed marketing content, this is it lol.
Hello again!! I dont play sicilian but will try to add this to my library after this one...OP video...(and OP acting in the beginning lol)
Congrats on your new Chessable course good to see a short and sweet for it.
"Exact calculation is your only true rule and god to follow." @ 17:13 too good. Going to be the opening to my chess notebook.
I've played the Sicilian as black ever since I was a beginner and every game is a new bunch of discoveries. Except for the boring grand prix and closed sicilian ones. A truly instructive opening for both colors !
Thank you Andras I love the open Sicilian from black but I usually use "anti"Sicilian from white, you have now convinced me to learn.
as a fan of the Open Sicilian this is my new favourite video of yours! Recently I've mainly been playing the Najdorf and I currently have a 65% win rate with it... never ever would I go back to playing 1e4 ...e5 or the French
I rarely face the open sicilian, my opponents usually go for some sidelines lol
This is the best motivational chess video on youtube.
Thanks man!
@@ChessCoachAndras thank YOU! I started playing Bc4 vs the Najdorf when I saw this game for example :) www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1487929 I have to compare to your line now. I am 2000 ish on lichess and mostly I just know a few moves/plans as white and it always works out. ie if I lose I lose because I mess up, not because my opponent "knew theory". Also we have to remember that Black also doesn't know the main lines because White rarely goes for them anyway. The Open Sicilian is paradoxically a sideline at amateur levels , so I can have my cake and eat it too.
@@ChessCoachAndras you should make another video about playing the main lines vs the French. Like why should I exchange on d5 or play some weird Tarrasch or something like that? Why not just go for Nc3 etc and go for it? Black also doesn't know everything about the Winawer, they're also winging it :))
Thank you for making this video it helped me get over my fear of the Sicilian and now I love playing it as White and Black! So often you hear people saying to avoid the Sicilian because it's too heavy, but frankly there's so much juice to be squeezed out of the opening that my opponents are often completely out of prep by move 5-7 and we just play a razor sharp game!
Im a 1300 player and am sick of the ruy lopez/ italian, center game against white
I dislike the caro its boring
Same with french, scandanavian is wild, its a coin toss between the two
Are there 4 or 5 Sicilian miniatures you'd recommend memorizing so instead of disconnected opening lines there's memorable storylines, structures and themes? I did that with the King's gambit years ago and those stuck with me even though I've forgotten everything else about it. It might make a cool video series.
I recommend checking out Judit Polgar's videos on her sicilian games against other great players, you can find them on youtube and they're amazing. Helped me to understand the ideas in the opening.
@@freetheorcas8509 I'm going to do that for sure. 👍
@@tiagomoraes1510 ok i know im 8 months overdue, but i also learned the king's gambit and had relative success with it before switching to the ruy, and here is how i learned it:
-i looked up the theory on youtube (look up hanging pawns, they have great opening theory vids)
-looked up and analysed as many romantic games (think Anderssen, Morphy, Greco etc.) as possible from agadmator
-logged the info into a lichess study along with common traps
-analysed my own games and logged them into said lichess study
(opinion: play the king's bishop gambit, its much easier than king's knight gambit even though your king ends up on f1)
thats it, have a great day!
... or studying anything else by Judit Polgar
My favorite variation of the Sicilian is the Corleone gambit. It's where you make an offer your opponent cannot refuse
*gun to opponent's head* draw?
The God Father 😯
Loving the content Coach 💪
And the thumbnails PhunkyT👌
12:59 there is a cool line here with each side sacking a queen if instead of 0-0-0 white plays the early e5. A tough one but i would heavily recommend playing it out on a board because of how nice it is. it goes:
1. e5 Bb7 2. exd6 Bxd6 3. Qe3 Bc5 4. 0-0-0 Nc6 5. Qxe6+! fxe6 6. Nxe6 Qe7 7. Rhe1 Qxe6! 8. Rxe6 Ne7 9. Rde1 0-0-0[]
There are about 6 more moves of trades and what not but this simplifies down to a drawn 2 rooks endgame. beautiful line.
you really do see these all over the place in the Sicilian, sometimes there are straight up piece sacks that are still considered book moves, like in the traditional Bg5 line with Bd3 theres 12. Nd5 which just straight up throws a knight in front of a pawn.
This video was so refreshing.
I am currently a beginner but the open sicilian is my favourite opening with the white and the black pieces, especially the Najdorf. When you play the sicilian as black, you declare you're not looking for equality - you're playing for a win with the black pieces. When you play the open sicilian as white, you accept black's challenge.
It's a sharp, double-edged opening which takes nerves and the willingness to take risks, that's why it's so awesome and generates some of the most beautiful attacking games.
Sidelines like the alapin and closed sicilian just aren't the same... I think especially the alapin is a very awkward version of the sicilian.
(Judit Polgar has a great series on her sicilian games and she's a beast with the white and the black pieces. Highly recommend it.)
The smith morra is just way more fun in my opinion. If you win with the smith morra you had an amazing attacking game and destroyed black, and it lowers the winning chances of black because it's your own game now. If you play 2. Nf3 looking for an open sicilian black can play a TON of options like d6 Nc6 e6 a6 g6 Nf6 and even some crap like f5 and you have to study everything! And for example if your opponents play 3...d6 then after d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 there is e6, a6, Nc6, g6 and a ton more.
@@itayn6422
I think the smith morra can be a fun opening and it's similar to the open sicilian but the open sicilian is just way cooler and way more interesting. It has aggressive, attacking qualities like the smith morra but is much more solid and methodical.
A lot of open sicilian lines are far more aggressive than the smith morra because you can go for queenside castling and pawn storm on the kingside. This is something you would never see in the smith morra because you weakened your queenside by sacrificing the c pawn, so you are definitely going to castle kingside, and also your knight is blocking your f pawn.
(In the smith morra you would never get to play e4, f4, g4 in the opening but there are lines like that in the open sicilian.)
@@itayn6422
The reason you give for playing the smith morra is basically "because black won't know what to do against it". But what if they do know what to do against it and then you are just playing a pawn down with questionable compensation? There are a tonne of successful lines black can play against the smith morra or lines to annoy you. Like what if you play 3. c3 and black plays 3. ...d3?
It's like with any opening. You are basically dependent on your opponent playing into the line to get the opening you want. White just developed the open sicilian because it's better.
There are several successful lines white can play against each of the black responses e6, a6, g6, nf6, etc. varying from aggressive and tactical to slow and strategic.
That's what makes it way more fun and interesting than playing the same gambit every time and hoping the opponent falls into a trap.
All of these openings you're talking about came from the open sicilian in the first place.
@@freetheorcas8509 I think coordinating my pieces to attack is more fun than throwing your pawns at the king (which I also enjoy as an e4 player agains the pirc for example) and a lot of the times in the morra we attack him before he castles.
@@freetheorcas8509 You think I play the morra because black doesn't know what to play against it? If you think that smith morra is only tricks and traps you clearly don't know anything about it. Also when my opponents play 3...d3 it's not annoying lol, you play Nf3 c4 Nc3 and eventually recapture the pawn and you have a big advantage, it's basically a better maroczy bind, and you're not even down a pawn. Please don't think that the Morra is only tricks and traps, I suggest that you go look at that.
Suggestion : organize an open-sicilian themed rapid tournament with the ChessDojo, and play in it. Maybe get one of the Senseis in as well (I believe Kostya coauthored a book on the open sicilian and plays the Taimanov as his main repertoire), and make some kind of friendly bet between the two top dogs. Get the masses playing 3.d4!!!
I get the sicilian so many times, I actually played it with you as white three times I think, one was very close until the endgame
As a very beginner player that had only learned a bit of d4 openings, I don't understand a lot of this, like what are anti-sicilian moves for example, but I love your energy and passion. Great video
Glad you enjoyed it!
I really like the Classical Sicilian. The mainline Bg5 Rauzer has some Najdorf like crazyness. But it is also the only critical line, so very practical. Maybe the Sozin is also critical but not that hard. Most of the other lines in the open classical you can play a dragon like setup without white having the Yugoslav attack and the Anti-Sicilians in the Classical move order are pretty easy.
Jesus christ mate the thumbnails have been mad lately
Passed it on to my lovely thumbnail guru, Phunkyt!
@12:53 I switched from Najdorf to Classical because I kept facing Bc4 attacks and it drives you nuts as black in bullet when you have to many threats to properly evaluate in the time and have to move. Instead of castles I have also tried Nd5. If Bxe7 Nxe7 which is fine. If exd5 Bxg5+, Kb1, exd5, Bxd5, 0-0. Seems a little better than straight up castling. But white still has a massive attack and Black has undeveloped pieces, coupled with a loose bishop.
(Not the position with the queen on c7, sorry the position if queen on d8 and Nd7 played and white O-O-O.)
Even i, a certified tactics hater got inspired to play other sicilian lines besides my beloved sveshnikov great video 10/10
Thanks!
The video kind of starts at around 5:00 in. I suggest you skip to the first could of examples and go from there.
I've always been an e4 player and just starting to explore the whole openings universe. I was going to start with the Italian game since that's the first one I learned and the only one I know. I'm totally sold on learning the open Sicilian and theory doesn't scare me. I estimate my rating to be somewhere between 800-1200. I got the Chessable Short and Sweet Open Sicilian course by Ivan Saric. Look forward to starting it! - Thanks for giving me some direction!
Came from todays stream Andras, Thank you for introducing me to the open sicilian !
I finally took the plunge-on both sides of the board! I’ve put the Petrov on hold for the Accelerated Dragon and I’m loving it. And I’ve set the Smith Morra aside for a full Open repertoire. What a wide world 😮 Won my first game against the Taimanov using the Qf3 idea and it felt great! It’s great to play both sides of something for once, something I can’t often do with the Petrov.
I've been primarily playing the Smith-Morra (with guidance from Marc Esserman's book) for about a year now, and it'll always have a special place in my heart as one of the things to get me back into chess, but you're absolutely right -- the Open Sicilian consistently produces unbelievable games.
My main response to 1. e4 is the Najdorf, so I'm terribly well acquainted with how insane proper Sicilian attacks can get, haha. I'm going to start reincorporating the Open into my White repertoire now that I'm better equipped for its positions.
The thing I miss most about playing 1...e5 is the Marshall Attack :(
This video made me play Sicilian. I only know the two first moves and then I have to think about the pawns.
I've been playing the closed Sicilian as white all this time. That's gonna change. I've also always played 1. e4 e5 as black hoping for a marshall attack against RL. I'm going to pick up the dragon now!
Love playing the Dragon. Accelerated has less theory. Great for Blitz also. You can whip out the first 8 moves
@@randyking9489 I actually prefer lots of theory. More learning!
2:50 are you going to play tomorrow against Topalov 😂😂😂 you silly silly mate
would love analysis to play this opening and more sacrificial motives
Ahh so you are an Aussie. I can hear it in your accent every now and then haha. Thanks for the videos, you are doing a great job!
Thanks Chris, appreciate your kind words. yeah, Butchering the Aussie accent with some heavy Hungarian added to it ROFL:)
@@ChessCoachAndras It's a very unique accent your pronunciations are really interesting haha. I don't think you're butchering it at all. It makes the videos really engaging. Btw I'm a fan of Simon Williams. Is the b4 wing gambit really that bad? Simon makes a very strong case for it in his gambits course. I find at my level especially it's a very practical weapon.
5:08 “Hey old man. Give me everything”
Andras- I thought you might be interested in my experience with the Sicilian. I am about 1900, Australian Chess Federation not internet, and took up the Sveshnikov in 1985 and learned it in excessive depth. You say this opening is good for positional players and I count myself as one. I found studying and playing this opening good for my chess especially as it really helped me develop the dynamic part of my game.
My experience was also that I played far more anti-sicilians than open sicilians. If I got to use my sveshnikov at all it was normally only once.
7:45 castling long side and opening up the king isnt that bad?
not if there is no way to exploit it.
what course or book should i study to learn this opening?
Tough question, Fist choose a line then look around. Lots on the market!
I'm citing this video as a source for a paper about the Sicilian Defense that I'm writing for my English class
Is it the greatness of the Sicilian or my presentation that made you go with this?:):):):)
@@ChessCoachAndras I had chosen to write about the Sicilian before I found this video, because of how awesome and iconic it is but your video has provided me with some great quotes to use and helped me articulate how truly great the Sicilian is. Thank you!!!
Andras : Sicilian is the most fun opening in the game.
The KID : uh what now ?!? 😅
LOL, next video is .....
I am playing open Sicilian as white in every line but 1. Against 2. ...Nc6 I like playing Rossolimo. I play Ruy Lopez against 1. ...e5 so at the start I wanted to give Rossolimo a chance as well (I know it is not really a good reasoning, but that is just how I started playing it). For some reason, I am comfortable playing it and I actually have a pretty good record in that line. I find that to be a nice variety to my game as well. And as I play 1. ...c5 as black, I get my fair share of open Sicilians from both sides, so I think playing Rossolimo along with open Sicilians is not bad for my learning experience. :)
Great selection of games ! You made you point beautifully ;)
Watching this video for the first time, at the 1 minute mark… my answer? Because it’s in your very own, new 1.e4 course!!! :D
Love and appreciate your content so thank you Sir!
10:20 hi I know this video was posted a long time ago but what happens if white captures with the Queen offering a Queen trade? What would black play?
If only there were some overview videos on TH-cam on the Open Sicilian. Where do we go to get a nice overview of White's options (of which there are many)? Because there's a lot of content out there on the gambits (Morra and Wing, etc.), and Danya is a huge proponent of the Alapin and Shrantz shows the deadly traps of the Delayed Alapin. But I can hardly find one video even laying out the basic choices for white in the Open. I'd love to see an overview to "see what I'm buying" so to speak. For now, I've been having tons of fun with the Morra but I'm looking to my longevity in chess and starting to browse around. So far, I'm curious about the Alapin, or Rossolimo combined with Delayed Alapin (if they play 2...d6). But I'd be open to going straight for the sharpest/soundest lines in the Open if only I could get a nice overview. The thing is: Lines like the Alapin just score so much better, even up to Grandmaster level sometimes. The opening simply punishes black if they try to go for their typical Sicilian setups.
Found a great overview: Search Schrantz Sicilian Variations
What Andras is really saying in this video, it that he likes the positions that come from the open variation of the Sicilian defence more than positions that come from some other openings.
It's totally fine to be just another guy with an opinion, it is less fine to impose your opinion on others and to act as if you are morally right and people who disagree with you are morally wrong.
I personally wouldn't play 1. f3 e5 2. Kf2 as White. In fact, I play the open Sicilian myself. But if someone does play that, if it brings them enjoyment, if they win with those opening moves, they have about the same right to call 1. f3 e5 2. Kf2 the best opening in existence, and call the open Sicilian a total rubbish as vice versa. And 1. f3 e5 2. Kf2 was played on every level mind you. GM Williams won a classical game with it in the 1999 British championship, and GM Carlsen used it to beat GM So in game 1 of the 2020 Banter blitz finals.
problem is that now at my level (around 1350 Lichess) nobody plays c5 against 1. e4 because all those big YT channel say not to. And when you play on the black side they go on some wierd closed stuff. I was one of them but i decided to stop. Thanks a lot for your changing my mind Andras!
Edit: now at 1650 and everybody plays Bc4 stuff against e6 Sicilian
So they still don't know how to play chess. Good for us, then.
I also switched recently from BLK side Caro Kann which I have played for years to the Sicilian Kan. And find the Sicilian games for Blk are much more wild. It's good to have both choices. I can slow things down with the solid Caro or play aggressive with Sicilian Kan!
I am primarily a c4 player, but after watching this I need to get my dosage of the Sicilian.
13:45 I'm confused. Assuming you don't see the thematic knight sac, why not just just take the rook with check before recapturing the bishop?
Because that takes us back to 3 pieces vs queen with a far less clean win.
I tried Sicilian as a kid. I do not like the idea that I lose if I am a tempo too slow or make one inaccuracy in a sharp position. I've been playing caro kann for years now but the position may become boring depending on how white decides to play. Ideally there would be some sweet spot between sicilian and caro kann. Thoughts?
I'm wondering the same. I figure the answer is E5, but a lot of those games look very closed and exhausting. I thought about picking up the Accelerated Dragon msyelf. I enjoy Queen's Gambit as white, so you'd think Caro-Kann would be a good complimenting opening, but Caro-Kann positions look so boring. If you figure something out, let me know. :)
@@Krisenaa Caro kann is not boring in itself. It's that white most often chooses boring lines. I recommend chessable's Lifetime Repertoire on Caro kann - Erwin l'Ami did a great job providing interesting lines. It's not always dull, I scored some great attacking wins with black because white did play fun lines and overextended. Get it? Caro kann and attacking chess lol. But it can happen, as Andras pointed out people avoid fascinating lines, mostly because they are more difficult.
1. e4 e5 is certainly an option but here there is so much to learn, especially that I have nevered played e5 in my carrer. I am an adult imrover, I do not have tons of time to study so that restricts me in my opening choice. However, e5 seems to be the best alternative.
Some Sicilian variations are more positional than others. I was looking into the Taimanov and Four Knights Sicilian by studying best vs common play using the Lichess database at my rating range. (That's how I shop for openings.) They perform very, very well up to the 2200 Lichess rating, and have natural, flexible development. The Accelerated Dragon is also a strong contender, in my opinion. Caro Kann can be cramped or abstract. But maybe that's to your taste. I've rarely found it to be the "solid, positional" opening people claim it is. I'm sure Sicilian players like to joke, why play c3 when you'll play c4 later, and you could have played c4 right away?!
You forgot about Anand!
I did too! Sicilian on both sides!
I'm a french plyr. U sold me when u said check a rino
Great video. I've tried to jump to the Sicilian a few times, but at my level, I never get to play the Sicilian (as black). I have to play against anti-Sicilians almost exclusively, which takes a bit of the fun out.
Edit: great point on (not) knowing theory and avoiding the sicilian because of it. Your opponent very likely doesn't either. It's so important to remember you're playing chess, not the sicilian, French, etc. as I believe you've pointed out elsewhere. My coach has pointed out times where I've played 'theory' i.e. memorized moves that didn't really fit the position.
many people below 1750 for some reason are attracted to anti sicilians (browdler, 2 knights, early f4)
Great coach, love you video's. Soon as you stop calling it repair-twaarr and instead rep-o-twar you'll go from great to perfect
I’ve considered playing d4 many times but I can’t give up the open Sicilian !
Extra bonus, you can play the Hedgehog out of a Sicilian if it looks good. Love watching white try to break it too early and get creamed by the counterplay.
THANKYOU SOO MUCH!
dear coach, do you think you would enjoy a video you look and analyze in detail , tactical sicilian games that you have a liking for? for more inspiration to us noobs
love the work regardless! keep em coming baby
Thanks man!
Totally! Just played a FIDE tournament and 3 of my 4 wins were with open sicilians. One game was only 18 moves.
21:15 Spassky played closed sicilian tho?
I want to learn this super cool 6.Bc4 Najdorf (I have always played 6.Be2 🤢) so do you recommend even for club level players without a coach to keep a file and try to develop it over time with analysis and engine work? I kind of worry trusting myself and not a stronger player’s analysis in a book or something.
Yes. In fact, up to a certain level, you don't really need a file. I don't keep files, I just hope I remember most of it. And doing such independent analysis as a whole is exceptionally useful. My understanding of all the openings I've studied has dramatically increased thanks to me having to work out the details on my own rather than just regurgitating a Chessable course. And some of the sidelines I've chosen are slightly unusual as a result, and my justifications for them are extremely specific.
I play the sicilian dragon,and I always get a great game when there is opposite side casting.
Hi. Can you tell me the kramnik game you were talking about?
Sir I totally agree but still there is too much theory, I am a caro player(who is tired of the boring positional games) but still sicillian is too theoretical so I will start playing sicillian when I am at least 1500 fide (currently 1156) till then I plan to improve on my tactics, positional play and endgame. I would have learned sicillian if I was a london player but I play e4... And u know against sicillian I play Grand prix which I dont think is boring right?
Grand Prix is not necessarily boring but falls into the category of "why would you do that to yourself??" You do realise that certain Sicilian lines require infinitely less theory than the Caro-Kann?!
@@ChessCoachAndras really?!!!?
@@Rohan-xc3kl Think about it. As a Caro Kann Player you need to Know main line Nc3, also Nf3 Nc3, Panov attack, Advanced , and exchange variations too! Learning the Accelerated Dragon, I reckon is far less.....
@@ChessCoachAndras Yes accelerated dragon is a Gr8 opening and u know I was going to learn it when I will become 1500, I may get some problems in maroczy bind, can u suggest some ways to handle that? 😁😁
You could just play the Classical Sicilian as the theory is very low and Black is fine and has an easy game in everything except 6. Bg5 but even at my level of 2000 online people never play it so I guess you’d be fine
andreas guess what? I thought about your advice and now i have started playing the accelerated dragon via the hyper accelerated dragon move order to avoid the rossolimo its very interesting opening i love it perfect for me now i play both caro and sicillian accelerated dragon
I absolutely love the Sicilian but the Dragon usually gets no respect. Thank you for setting it straight!
Play the Caro Kann and French are the real nightmares for e4 players...
YOu mean the wet dreams?
The Exchange French players are the real nightmare for the French players...
@@Musicrafter12 My favourite opening.
@@Musicrafter12 nightmare when facing a lower rated opponent but not when facing a stronger one ^^
Which is why the last 5 world champions have chosen the French or Car Kann as the main or backup line against 1.e4 in their matches.
"why would you avoid the open Sicilian"
To play against it correctly, i need to know every variation my opponent might use against me. To play it against me correctly, my opponent needs to know ONE variation I don't know.
London it is my friend!
Also yeah I don't know anti Sicilian theory but the difference between my knowledge of open and anti, vs the difference between my opponent's knowledge of their preferred variation and anti is probably very big
(also i get open Sicilian games when i play the hyper accelerated dragon vs e4 lol)
You mentioned the Kan variation for some type of players (positional?).
I'm not good at tactics (but try to be better).
Is the Kan even then a good choice for me. (I'm 1700 Lichess classic).
As white how many variants do I have to learn/study as a starter? (I'm talking about games at 1700 lever Lichess classic).
Are there some generic setup for white?
I'm a lower rated player learning sicilian. I've learned there are lots of different ways of playing against each sicilian, but there are a few general setups to be familiar with, hope this simplifies it a bit:
English/Yugoslav attack type setups - "Be3, f3, Qd2, 0-0-0, (g4, h4, etc.)"
Maroczy bind setups - "e4, c4"
Fischer-Sozin attack - "Bc4"
Richter-Rauzer/Classical Najdorf - "Bg5, f4, Qd2/Qf3, 0-0-0"
Classical setups - "Be2, Be3, 0-0"
Fianchetto setups - "g3, Bg2"
Unfortunately the 1.e4 Repertoire for chessable comes with the Alapin.
I would not say it is unfortunate. It was inevitable. With open Sicilian a course that has 150 trainables would have turned into one with 700. Simply there was no other way.
@@ChessCoachAndras Of course this attitude towards the amount of trainable positions is a respectable one. One of my first 1e4 reps (by Sam Collins, Batsford) was also choosing the Alapin. Good work, master Toth!
@ChessCoachAndras Why is the open considered white's best response when even grandmasters win more with the Rossolimo and Stockfish gives them the same evaluation? (I know black can also play 2.d6 to avoid it, and I understand the limitations of engines in the opening phase). Do you think it's simply because even grandmasters haven't fully explored how to counter the Rossolimo?
Regardless, I think the main reason you vouch for aspiring players to learn the Open is for them to truly participate in chess history, play dynamic imbalanced games and learn a lot (from which there are so many historic games to study). So I totally get that.
actually, it's been proven that white's temporal(time) advantage prevails even without cracking the centre
@@bruhifysbackup What do you mean?
@@marcofrey2903 White has proven an advantage in the Nf3 Bb5 lines
@@bruhifysbackup By what means, by whom, to what depth? I would think all Sicilians are draws at the most extreme depths, unless 2...c5 is slightly, slightly dubious.I guess 3...d6 is also a bit better at the highest levels, too. But by my original point, I would imagine that the Rossolimo also simply has more unexplored territory. Anyways, I think I'm more keen on playing the Open the more I think about it, not only to participate in chess history but also because I'm more attacking/tactically minded. Currently, my only weapon is the Smith Morra.
@@marcofrey2903 Well, if we think in your perspective, there are three evals: Win with best play, holdable/draw with best play, loss with best play. And I agree with that, and also I wanted to try the open but I realised that there were way too much things that black could do like: e4 c5 Nf3)
a6,b6,Nc6,Qc7,d6,e6,g6, even h6 and a lot more branching after Nf3 and also with best play these moves shouldn't create enough weaknesses to be considered winning for one side, heck engines say Czech Benoni is worse than h6 Sicilian, like what?
I think there is more to remember in Italian game. I get trapped alot in that but can improvise in Sicilian.
Hey coach! Great video! I actually stopped playing the Sicilian as Black because I found out most of my opponents would actually reel out some boring anti sicilian against me. I never knew what to do and I hated it. Dropped the entire opening as a result. What's your advice to Black players facing so many Anti lines?
Stick through it and climb up the rating ladder. Eventually you'll reach a rating of opponents that respect themselves and openly engage in the open Sicilian with you.
So, I watched this and thought, yeah good point. Went and tried the open as white and got smothered mate against a higher rated player. Boom
I would like to play Sicilian again, but it's so complicated. And so tactical. It's like a minefield.
I just switched from Scandi to Sicilian (encouraged by the Amateur's Mind rant on openings. Like, video 3 or 5 in the series). Just decided to start playing it in my games and, boy, is it ever so much sharper than anything the Scandi ever gives you... Definitely going to be "investing in loss" for quite some time there.
I used to be a big Qd8 Scandi fan. Never played it in anything serious, but had fun w/it & Icelandic/Portuguese gambits. Now I pretty much exclusively play the Kan Sicilian. Highly recommend! :)
Best🤭😆 chess motivator online
"not the bongcloud" LOL
If you look at the Lichess player database, the anti sicilians score better than the open Sicilian. Most players have an anti Sicilian. I used to play the Sveschnikov Sicilian and rarely got it. The solid 10 Bxf6 line in the Sveschnikov has a large 64% draw rate in the Lichess master database. The exchange French isn't any worse really.
As white I played 2. c3 Alapin and had good results. The Rossolimo is a good opening too. If you look at other openings besides Sicilians, e.g., Scandanavian Portuguese, Caro Kann advanced 3. ...c5, or French Poisoned Pawn Winawer -- Black scores *more* (better than white and better than open Sicilians) in the Lichess database. White often has a pet line (Wing gambits, Smith Morra, etc etc) v Sicilians, less so v anything else. How many club players have a pet line v Alekhine or 2. ...Nf6 Scandi? Recently I've been playing French and I notice white often over extends. A routine move and whites d4-e5 structure can be put under a lot of pressure. See Jonathon Schranz's youtube video: Easy Wins with the French Defense | The Power of the Blueprint.
And even if you do get an open Sicilian and get your opening -- white can play almost anything and they're fine. g3 -- sure. f3 English attack, ya that's good too. Bc4 that's a line. Bg5, ya that's another line. f4 another.
In alapin there are many traps too but i agree this looks more fun
"No world champion since Botvinnik didn't have the Sicilian as part of their main repertoire" Then Along came ding liren
Is Morra Gambit a disgusting counter for sicilian for you?
Nope. Have a morra video on the channel too!
Thanks!
Andras, what do you think of the Lowenthal variation compared to the Taimanov or the Kan for someone just starting out with playing the Sicilian?
Okay Coach fair enough... want us to play open Sicilian, we'll play open Sicilian...but do a nice, detailed, lengthy series so we can finally move out of our comfort zones of playing the delayed Alapin and Closed Sicilian....
It's true: There's a lot of content out there on the gambits against Sicilian (Morra and Wing, etc.), and Danya is a huge proponent of the Alapin and Shrantz shows the deadly traps of the Delayed Alapin. But I can hardly find one video even laying out the basic choices for white in the Open Sicilian (of which there are many). I'd love to see an overview to "see what I'm buying" so to speak. For now, I've been having tons of fun with the Morra but I'm looking to my longevity in chess and starting to browse around. So far, I'm curious about the Alapin, or Rossolimo combined with Delayed Alapin (if they play 2...d6). But I'd be open to going straight for the sharpest/soundest lines in the Open if only I could get a nice overview. The thing is: Lines like the Alapin just score so much better, even up to Grandmaster level sometimes. The opening simply punishes black if they try to go for their typical Sicilian setups.
I feel like people who avoid the open sicil are fearful of losing. Even though the sicillian is one of the most double edged openings in all of chess. The better player truly wins.
No, they are fearful of losing to a person that does not have to think. 1 e4 players love open positions.