we usually associate creativity with people devoted to the arts, but after watching these videos I see just as much creativity in the scientific world.
Most artists are derivative, most scientists are creative. No one publishes variations of earlier papers, but many artists specialize in variations of previous styles and fashions. I would argue that creativity is far more common in the sciences than in the arts. I would even argue that the arts are inherently conservative, while the sciences are inherently progressive.
@@nomdeguerre7265 so you're saying scientists make shit up? They're supposed to be observing reality and "create laws" around those observations. Tell me, is that more derivative or creative...? It would also appear you haven't met either a science obsessed person or an artist, otherwise you wouldn't be so confused on this subject.
creativity, like IQ, can be measured reliably and the bitter truth is that it is NOT evenly distributed among everyone. Actually, it is extremely unevenly distributed (unlike IQ), with a few people expressing creative genius and many people expressing little to no creativity. This is hard for creative people to understand and imagine, but it is repeatedly born out by the data. Once you realize this, the world looks different. Among software developers, it is especially stark: some devs are creative and will approach any problem using this creative approach... and most developers are NOT creative, and will ONLY EVER copy solutions that other people have written. And the uncreative programmers literally cannot create a novel solution/algorithm. The truth is that there's lots of merit in using/editing existing solutions, but it also means you can never come up with something new. It is like AI versus real intelligence (not to call uncreative people unintelligence, I just mean that AI basically remixes existing ideas from its training to creative superficially novel answers).
Creativity is a process and most artists are diverse in many fields including physics. Prerequisite for artist is perspective and a common one is, the path to mastery of anything is easy. Just copy your last path.
Einstein said falling into a black would be uneventful for Alice, while Bob would only see her asymptotically slowing down, never quite reaching its Horizon. Okay. But how can this be true for Alice if she has to pass through a billion degree corona before ever reaching the Horizon? I think being incinerated would not qualify as uneventful. Also, what about infalling information in general? Does this report in a sense validate at last the firewall paradox and argue black holes cannot truly conserve information? It would be great if Anton could comment on this.
The accretion disc accumulates due to rotation around the equator. The poles are cleared out by relativistic jets generated by powerful magnetic fields. That is why this model makes sense. Black holes do not look like the sun.
I always imagined that the accretion disk around the black hole was simply a flat disc compressed by the magnetic fields of the black hole. Buy my logic you would almost think that the very inner edges of the accretion disk would actually be smaller and made of finer particles.
The sheer volume of commenters on every science channel that drop in to chinstroke, and let everybody know that whatever was just said confirms their "theory..." It's a large number.
@Deletirium Sudies of Cygnus x-1 about 6 years ago pointed toward a spherical or disk like corona, ruling out the lamp-post model due to an absence of that model's characteristic high polarization and reflections off the accretion disk.
I wonder why the use of the term "Corona" was thought to be appropriate in the first place. The phenomenon to be studies, being the hottest part of the astronomical feature we currently call "Black Hole", formerly described as if it were like the astro-physical jets we observe, perpendicular to the accretion disc of some very active objects of this kind and really not like the feature of our Sun for which we have used the term. Time for a change. The hottest part of the accretion disc, being a better description?
*OMG A STORY INVOLVING IXPE!!!!* I asked Google Gemini how the IXPE mission was going like not even a week ago (and I followed up with due diligence like a good lil AI user). Turns out, it's been a great contributor to astronomy, specifically X-ray astronomy (the now most vulnerable wavelengths for continued scientific access re:Chandra and the budget), and is definitely still active. Why I care? Luck, chance, and history. My history, American history, and _Italian_ history! I watched the launch lol, and found out about this new space observatory that'd be joining the fray a few days before it went up (end of 2021 on a Falcon 9 from Cape Canaveral, which I live an hour away from). It was obscure, which I love, and I ordered a mission patch online that I really enjoy looking at every day. And as for being both American and Italian history? It was a NASA collab with the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana! You go, Italy, love you guys 🇮🇹
isnt the corona s shape dependent of what the black hole is eating and other parameters? why would they be all alike? isnt coronas of different suns also different?
3:02 What is so difficult about it? Aren't there a nuclear fusion inside the star (hence all of the radiation)? That 100% extremely hot process and the external layer of a star is the furthest point from that. Earth is the coldest on the surface too. The coronal burst is the same as volcanic eruption but on a different scale. Magma is hot, you know
Hm, so why is it not just a sphere like with the sun? I mean the spin would produce the aggression disk, if there is another structure not affected by it… or is that some form of induced fields perpendicular to the spin?
United Cosmic Artists say we were told to make black holes round w/ a dark center - remember these are cartoons since x-rays colors can't be seen like a rainbow - is this real or fake reporting ?
Kind of a random question, but I have been working on a paper I would like to publish, would like it to be open access but not have to pay thousands of dollars. Not looking for clout or anything, just want to get the info out so it can be tested by others. Any recommended open access publishers?
The corona (the heat) only exists because of the accretion disk, if there was nothing to accrete, there would be no corona and no heat. Edit: but the general theory is that nothing can really “enter” a black hole anyway, from our perspective.
@@chrisvawdrey2810 I couldn’t tell ya, to be honest! Anton probably has some vids I can go look back to but I feel as if the info will change based on the shape idk
Since the plasma is extremely close to the the event horizon, is there plasma inside the event horizon? We can not see it, so I guess it would be someone's calculation.
@TTime685 the sucker's got to grow somehow. He didn't say or imply it was escaping, he's referring to the fact that singularities are not the same size as the event horizon so there would have to be plasma tumbling in
Any discussion about "inside" of an event horizon becomes meaningless. It is effectively outside of our universe. The only thing that matters is total mass, spin and electrostatic charge.
They actually don't mind being wrong because they not only learn something but also their models, simulations, etc. are then based on accurate observations & data.
@@Hei1Bao4 Are you basing your conclusion on Anton's videos or have you been to a conference where astrophysicists present papers and receive feedback from other astrophysicists? Or read the feedback on papers published on arXiv? Anton summarizes and simplifies research papers, scientific journals, etc. then presents these to us in daily videos. Drawing conclusions based on Anton's videos vs. the work done by professional astrophysicists yields inaccurate results.
@douglaswilkinson5700 Based on their old models that can't be replicated or tested on Earth. There is a huge gap in our knowledge of how hydrogen behaves under the pressures found in giant planets and stars. Also, in how matter behaves at the edge of known physics, which dictates the structure of galaxies. Until Lamda CDM is looked at critically, there won't be any meaningful advancement in our knowledge of our Universe.
All the blackholes in space are just ancient intergalactic civilizations that made a mistake and this is the result.. we're just along for the ride in the milky way's mistake, it's a universal ecosystem, rinse and repeat and someday any one of the stars in our galaxy could turn into a blackhole, its just a matter of time that travels. we're developing newer ways of seeing our universe in real time but we are many many years behind the others.
THAT "FORMATION" TO YOUR RIGHT IN THE POSTING IMAGE... Why does a Dyson Ring come to mind? Could it be that Science needs to revise its perception(s) of Singularities? Inasmuch as GRAVITATION is a CONSTANT and (apparently) a constant and potent form of "ENERGY". 🛸 Hmm... Might be worth a closer look-see?
The issue with that is entropy. A black hole has very high entropy while the big bang had very little entropy, plus the fact that black holes are made of existing matter while the big bang was the creation of all matter.
@@johnjackson4905you’re not looking big enough… our universe from which “all matter was created” may just be the other side of a black hole. Entropy and the universe expanding look like the tracing of world lines of a black hole but reversed… like if you cross over.
There are no black holes. Einstein wrote in 1939 - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to dilation. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. It's the "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. All galaxies with low mass centers have normal/near normal rotation rates.
There's clearly an ultradense gravitational body near the centre of our galaxy, can see as much with telescopes, though I don't think we have a good idea about the nature of that class of ultradense body. It is an assymptote and cosmologists are yakking religiously, as is their custom.
@acmhfmggru Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur. This forbids astronomical concentrations of mass. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Pauli, Feynman etc. because of this fact. What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center. Singularities were popularized by television and movies beginning in the 1960's. There was clarity in astronomy before this happened. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. This indicates 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. Due to the phenomenon of dilation the mass in our galactic center exists in a "non local" state from the vantage point of an Earthbound observer. In other words it's not just there, it's everywhere.
A dilation/time dilation graph illustrates the phenomenon. It has velocity from stationary to the speed of light on the horizontal line and dilation/gamma on the vertical. This shows its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. The best way to understand it is to imagine a spaceship traveling at a constant acceleration rate. When the ship reaches 50% light speed, as viewed from an Earthbound observer with a magically powerful telescope, it would appear normal because as the graph shows nothing has changed at that point. When the ship reaches 75% light speed it would appear fuzzy because as the graph shows relativistic effects would be noticeable at that point. When the ship reaches 99% light speed it would not be visible because every aspect of its existence would be smeared through spacetime relative to an Earthbound observer, not onto itself.
@@acmhfmggru Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur. This forbids astronomical concentrations of mass. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Pauli, Feynman etc. because of this reason. What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center. Singularities were popularized by television and movies beginning in the 1960's. There was clarity in astronomy before this happened. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. This indicates 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. Due to the phenomenon of dilation the mass in our galactic center exists in a "non local" state from the vantage point of an Earthbound observer. In other words it's not just there, it's everywhere. Mass is a clingy thing thanks to gravity, it makes sense that it exists as a halo around galaxies.
i suggest you get familiar with Plasma cosmology , and with Halton Arp , Hubble himself consider retardation of light , yes you will never hear about it if you dont research it yourself , in general even if you are dummy reading Halton Arp will make sense , there are images there as well :X ... it will start to make sense after that black holes are non existent by singularity itself , no need of any other arguments , point blank period
@@VectorMonz Theories -- in science -- are based on independently verifiable observations or experiments, have withstood challenges for a material amount of time and whose predictions about the outcomes of future experiments and observations are accurate. This is why Einstein's Special and General Theories of Relativity are Theories and not hypotheses or conjectures. Hypotheses based theories still must be independently verified, etc.
Basically an icy pole that reflect's the ocean that create's it,the ice in another condenced by gravity state can only reflect within its body of water and vapour/dust envelope as it cant escape the gravity or crash through heavier particles closer to the black hole(crust like energies)
Greetings Wonderful Person. I am Anton’s personal assistant, Android ZNH-39. I regret to inform you that the information you’ve requested has been labeled as CLASSIFIED by the scientific consensus and understanding methodologies group (SCUM) and thus your query cannot be sufficiently processed unless you provide irrefutable evidence of … ok nevermind, I’m lying. I don’t know…
@@user-Aaron-ooohh you are right, I didnt know there was this much you could put, im used to the show more drop down and didnt realize you could scroll past that, thank dawg.
What if wormholes were real. What would be gravitational affects what would be affects on light. Would earas of gravity be linked strong other would be with no explanation
dear anton would you like to say something abt drones that are not there and not dangerous but we dont know what they are or where they're from whatever we may think they are not dangerous
We live in 4-dimentional spacetime as shown by Einstein & Minkowski. The first 3 dimensions are spacial and the 4th is time. The 4 dimensions cannot be separated from each other. They are "interwoven." We do know a few things about spacetime such as the faster you travel in the 3 spacial dimensions the slower you travel in time.
I predict that, if white holes do exist, they are seen either as stars or black holes in most cases, as the matter they continuously expel condenses around the white hole, eventually just collapsing into a black hole where it just becomes a white hole in another dimension. It's like the white hole is a giant worm eating it's way through dimensions, linking them together with its mass.
The black hole acts like a relief valve for matter, on unimaginable scales obviously, that allows stars to form at just “the right” rate. History of the Universe had a good video on it a few months ago. Galaxies, and us, are possible because of black holes, if it’s true.
Precisely, we are balanced between a black hole at the center (Sagittarius A*) and the dark matter halo that circles the galaxy. In a dance between 1 explainable gravitational anomaly, and 1 we’re still trying to explain.
Why? Because the theory that predicted it (Einstein's Relativity) requires it to conserve angular momentum. Momentum is hella important to getting the GR equations to work. How? Well.... Any experiments necessary to tell that would be inconveniently located behind a one-way-only information barrier. There are some who speculate it becomes something akin to the "angular momentum" of quantum particles like the electron. Which in itself is too weird to describe with macroscopic language.
I'd recommend watching a video to understand. But all astrophysical bodies have some degree of rotation because of how they form due to gravity, and like the other commenter said, momentum is conserved.
‘We may’, ‘very likely’ So basically a pointless video. More nonsense. More unprovable ideas. I mean who cares really. With what’s going on on this planet there’s far more important things to resolve. Black hole shape isn’t one of them. Pointless expenditure of resources.
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
![ค้าง (STILL) - GEMINI [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ftxx3hk5vkU/mqdefault.jpg)
Honestly one of the best science channels on TH-cam. Excellent work.
we usually associate creativity with people devoted to the arts, but after watching these videos I see just as much creativity in the scientific world.
Indeed! Every artist has their own medium. And every one of us has a bit of artist in us.
Most artists are derivative, most scientists are creative. No one publishes variations of earlier papers, but many artists specialize in variations of previous styles and fashions. I would argue that creativity is far more common in the sciences than in the arts. I would even argue that the arts are inherently conservative, while the sciences are inherently progressive.
@@nomdeguerre7265 so you're saying scientists make shit up? They're supposed to be observing reality and "create laws" around those observations. Tell me, is that more derivative or creative...? It would also appear you haven't met either a science obsessed person or an artist, otherwise you wouldn't be so confused on this subject.
creativity, like IQ, can be measured reliably and the bitter truth is that it is NOT evenly distributed among everyone. Actually, it is extremely unevenly distributed (unlike IQ), with a few people expressing creative genius and many people expressing little to no creativity. This is hard for creative people to understand and imagine, but it is repeatedly born out by the data.
Once you realize this, the world looks different. Among software developers, it is especially stark: some devs are creative and will approach any problem using this creative approach... and most developers are NOT creative, and will ONLY EVER copy solutions that other people have written. And the uncreative programmers literally cannot create a novel solution/algorithm. The truth is that there's lots of merit in using/editing existing solutions, but it also means you can never come up with something new. It is like AI versus real intelligence (not to call uncreative people unintelligence, I just mean that AI basically remixes existing ideas from its training to creative superficially novel answers).
Creativity is a process and most artists are diverse in many fields including physics. Prerequisite for artist is perspective and a common one is, the path to mastery of anything is easy. Just copy your last path.
Applauding the amazing Anton again 😊
Great job Anton
One could imagine intergalactic space gods using black holes for physics experiments and graduating from UNIVERSE-ity with full accretion.
Interesting new interpretation of the data about black holes
Thank you, Anton!
Einstein said falling into a black would be uneventful for Alice, while Bob would only see her asymptotically slowing down, never quite reaching its Horizon. Okay. But how can this be true for Alice if she has to pass through a billion degree corona before ever reaching the Horizon? I think being incinerated would not qualify as uneventful.
Also, what about infalling information in general? Does this report in a sense validate at last the firewall paradox and argue black holes cannot truly conserve information? It would be great if Anton could comment on this.
The accretion disc accumulates due to rotation around the equator. The poles are cleared out by relativistic jets generated by powerful magnetic fields. That is why this model makes sense. Black holes do not look like the sun.
5:25 It's IXPE (Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer), NOT IPXE.
Very intriguing name.
It's really quite okay, I assure you, but yes. You have pointed it out for posterity.
So in essence the older movies which predicted a flat black hole disk were always right.
CooL new information from Anton The Great!! 😊🎉❤
Fascinating!
Really interesting, nice presentation, thanks Anton 👍❤
Such a sick shirt dude 🤘
Mine is first in my t shirt rotation.
I always imagined that the accretion disk around the black hole was simply a flat disc compressed by the magnetic fields of the black hole. Buy my logic you would almost think that the very inner edges of the accretion disk would actually be smaller and made of finer particles.
So the corona is the innermost part of the acretion disk?
Always thought the lamp-post model was a tad ad hoc.
The sheer volume of commenters on every science channel that drop in to chinstroke, and let everybody know that whatever was just said confirms their "theory..."
It's a large number.
@Deletirium Sudies of Cygnus x-1 about 6 years ago pointed toward a spherical or disk like corona, ruling out the lamp-post model due to an absence of that model's characteristic high polarization and reflections off the accretion disk.
I wonder why the use of the term "Corona" was thought to be appropriate in the first place. The phenomenon to be studies, being the hottest part of the astronomical feature we currently call "Black Hole", formerly described as if it were like the astro-physical jets we observe, perpendicular to the accretion disc of some very active objects of this kind and really not like the feature of our Sun for which we have used the term. Time for a change. The hottest part of the accretion disc, being a better description?
Because corona means crown, which refers to the visible phenomenon, not the temperature.
6:12' Like an axle through the center of a wheel, "The center holds!" Ken Wheeler: Secrets of the universe.
Amazing, as usual
Love all the b roll - never change
*OMG A STORY INVOLVING IXPE!!!!*
I asked Google Gemini how the IXPE mission was going like not even a week ago (and I followed up with due diligence like a good lil AI user).
Turns out, it's been a great contributor to astronomy, specifically X-ray astronomy (the now most vulnerable wavelengths for continued scientific access re:Chandra and the budget), and is definitely still active.
Why I care? Luck, chance, and history. My history, American history, and _Italian_ history! I watched the launch lol, and found out about this new space observatory that'd be joining the fray a few days before it went up (end of 2021 on a Falcon 9 from Cape Canaveral, which I live an hour away from). It was obscure, which I love, and I ordered a mission patch online that I really enjoy looking at every day. And as for being both American and Italian history? It was a NASA collab with the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana! You go, Italy, love you guys 🇮🇹
isnt the corona s shape dependent of what the black hole is eating and other parameters? why would they be all alike? isnt coronas of different suns also different?
The corona is separate and different from the accretion disk.
I remember the Knack made a song about it.
My Sharona?
3:02 What is so difficult about it? Aren't there a nuclear fusion inside the star (hence all of the radiation)? That 100% extremely hot process and the external layer of a star is the furthest point from that. Earth is the coldest on the surface too. The coronal burst is the same as volcanic eruption but on a different scale. Magma is hot, you know
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. ✌️😁🙂
Howdy from Temple, Texas, USA! How're y'all?
Howdy from elmina, Cape coast, Ghana
greetings from Delaware, hoping we can repeal that amendment LOL
Howdy from Austin
-20F in Alberta Canada, balmy 😊
I am a resident of Temple, TX as well. Hello to you.
1:50 In getting rid of the ISS, what about the newer science equipment and experiments on and in it?
Great video.
You said "corona" and I had to check to see if they put an unwarranted warning.
so black holes are princesses with coronas and everything else...little queens spreading their influence throughout the universe
Constantly trying to image a black hole is turning out to be a way to realize it’s working can become imaginable… just not for an eye.
Oh, nonsense! It's utterly straightforw-hatthehell... ;)
Great choice of topic! Thank you for the fascinating video! 😘🍭
Be gone, bot.
@@Receipt It's scary actually how good they are getting, sometimes their comments are on point with the video.
What about the shape of Uranus?
I always had a suspicion but the finding is magnitudes larger then i expected holy moly~
Very cool! Thanks, Anton! 🎉 🕳 ⛳️
After viewing wonderful Anton for years
Something i learn
The dark side of univers is extremely cool
And
The light side of univers is extremely hot
Hm, so why is it not just a sphere like with the sun? I mean the spin would produce the aggression disk, if there is another structure not affected by it… or is that some form of induced fields perpendicular to the spin?
United Cosmic Artists say we were told to make black holes round w/ a dark center - remember these are cartoons since x-rays colors can't be seen like a rainbow - is this real or fake reporting ?
Kind of a random question, but I have been working on a paper I would like to publish, would like it to be open access but not have to pay thousands of dollars. Not looking for clout or anything, just want to get the info out so it can be tested by others. Any recommended open access publishers?
Didn’t know they even had them.
Your channel is a source of endless inspiration. Thank you for your hard work!🧐🦀🥁
Not "We" but scientists who need to learn more about black holes instead of publishing premature academic papers.
It would seem that nothing could enter a black hole because it would burn up before it even gets close.
The corona (the heat) only exists because of the accretion disk, if there was nothing to accrete, there would be no corona and no heat. Edit: but the general theory is that nothing can really “enter” a black hole anyway, from our perspective.
@@f0rdgamer Matter definitely enters a black hole, but it does so after being considerably altered from it's original state.
Is it possible for some of the heat to enter the black hole and raise it's temperature?
Queue CMB in my brain just now hmm
@artistana523 I suppose the question is can gravity attract heat
@@artistana523 am I right in assuming that black holes are cold
@@chrisvawdrey2810 I couldn’t tell ya, to be honest! Anton probably has some vids I can go look back to but I feel as if the info will change based on the shape idk
Your videos are always so inspiring! I look forward to seeing more episodes! 🍓🌺
Bot
Must be energy hungry running x rays but who knows
So basically the corona is what we see with quasars.
Since the plasma is extremely close to the the event horizon, is there plasma inside the event horizon? We can not see it, so I guess it would be someone's calculation.
How would there be plasma inside the event horizon ? 🤦🏼♂️ Nothing is in the same state of matter once crossing the event horizon..
@TTime685 the sucker's got to grow somehow. He didn't say or imply it was escaping, he's referring to the fact that singularities are not the same size as the event horizon so there would have to be plasma tumbling in
@@TTime685You should read your comments first before posting them.
Any discussion about "inside" of an event horizon becomes meaningless. It is effectively outside of our universe. The only thing that matters is total mass, spin and electrostatic charge.
@@user-Aaron- Umm, you should think about what you comment before posting useless comments?
Not at all surprised they learned they were wrong about something. I expect that to happen a lot in astronomy.
They actually don't mind being wrong because they not only learn something but also their models, simulations, etc. are then based on accurate observations & data.
Every wrong , something will be found or debunked. Eventually enough errors has been made probability of success raises.
@@douglaswilkinson5700 With the way they defend their models and move their goal posts, it seems more ego than science in this particular field.
@@Hei1Bao4 Are you basing your conclusion on Anton's videos or have you been to a conference where astrophysicists present papers and receive feedback from other astrophysicists? Or read the feedback on papers published on arXiv?
Anton summarizes and simplifies research papers, scientific journals, etc. then presents these to us in daily videos. Drawing conclusions based on Anton's videos vs. the work done by professional astrophysicists yields inaccurate results.
@douglaswilkinson5700 Based on their old models that can't be replicated or tested on Earth. There is a huge gap in our knowledge of how hydrogen behaves under the pressures found in giant planets and stars. Also, in how matter behaves at the edge of known physics, which dictates the structure of galaxies. Until Lamda CDM is looked at critically, there won't be any meaningful advancement in our knowledge of our Universe.
Now you got me humming that song from the late 90's called How Bizarre by OMC.
Definitely a catchy tune.
Now I have that stuck in my head. Thank you very much.😵💫
Maybe black holes really are 2D
All the blackholes in space are just ancient intergalactic civilizations that made a mistake and this is the result.. we're just along for the ride in the milky way's mistake, it's a universal ecosystem, rinse and repeat and someday any one of the stars in our galaxy could turn into a blackhole, its just a matter of time that travels. we're developing newer ways of seeing our universe in real time but we are many many years behind the others.
Cool story bro
Oh no not corona again
Black Hole Anatomy
9:39 So many blinis…
Looks like there is another event horizon...
My Corona!!!😁😎
THAT "FORMATION" TO YOUR RIGHT IN THE POSTING IMAGE...
Why does a Dyson Ring come to mind? Could it be that Science needs to revise its perception(s) of Singularities?
Inasmuch as GRAVITATION is a CONSTANT and (apparently) a constant and potent form of "ENERGY".
🛸
Hmm... Might be worth a closer look-see?
a mystery!!!!!!......🤔
so much money were spent about that things like naked singularity , cosmic censorship ... its hilarious brother
Stay wonderful I'll see you tomorrow and as always bye-bye!😁
An absolute hot corona around the binary engine at the theoretical minimum?
Boom didi boom didi High Corona
Starting to think the big bang was a blackhole..
Your not alone in that hypnosis. We may me in a black hole right now
The issue with that is entropy. A black hole has very high entropy while the big bang had very little entropy, plus the fact that black holes are made of existing matter while the big bang was the creation of all matter.
@@johnjackson4905you’re not looking big enough… our universe from which “all matter was created” may just be the other side of a black hole. Entropy and the universe expanding look like the tracing of world lines of a black hole but reversed… like if you cross over.
It was proven that our reality is not locally real per the Nobel prize winners...maybe it was a big white hole
I agree with that conclusion
Might be the spin rate, fascinating stuff.
What are your thoughts on all the strange UAP activity that's been happening lately? 🛸👽🛸
Wonderful lecture Anton you wonderful you. !! ✔✔✔✔✔
There are no black holes. Einstein wrote in 1939 -
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to dilation. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. It's the "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. All galaxies with low mass centers have normal/near normal rotation rates.
No one cares virgin
There's clearly an ultradense gravitational body near the centre of our galaxy, can see as much with telescopes, though I don't think we have a good idea about the nature of that class of ultradense body. It is an assymptote and cosmologists are yakking religiously, as is their custom.
@acmhfmggru Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur. This forbids astronomical concentrations of mass. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Pauli, Feynman etc. because of this fact.
What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center.
Singularities were popularized by television and movies beginning in the 1960's. There was clarity in astronomy before this happened.
99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. This indicates 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. Due to the phenomenon of dilation the mass in our galactic center exists in a "non local" state from the vantage point of an Earthbound observer. In other words it's not just there, it's everywhere.
A dilation/time dilation graph illustrates the phenomenon. It has velocity from stationary to the speed of light on the horizontal line and dilation/gamma on the vertical. This shows its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light.
The best way to understand it is to imagine a spaceship traveling at a constant acceleration rate. When the ship reaches 50% light speed, as viewed from an Earthbound observer with a magically powerful telescope, it would appear normal because as the graph shows nothing has changed at that point.
When the ship reaches 75% light speed it would appear fuzzy because as the graph shows relativistic effects would be noticeable at that point.
When the ship reaches 99% light speed it would not be visible because every aspect of its existence would be smeared through spacetime relative to an Earthbound observer, not onto itself.
@@acmhfmggru Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur. This forbids astronomical concentrations of mass. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Pauli, Feynman etc. because of this reason.
What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center.
Singularities were popularized by television and movies beginning in the 1960's. There was clarity in astronomy before this happened.
99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. This indicates 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. Due to the phenomenon of dilation the mass in our galactic center exists in a "non local" state from the vantage point of an Earthbound observer. In other words it's not just there, it's everywhere. Mass is a clingy thing thanks to gravity, it makes sense that it exists as a halo around galaxies.
i suggest you get familiar with Plasma cosmology , and with Halton Arp , Hubble himself consider retardation of light , yes you will never hear about it if you dont research it yourself , in general even if you are dummy reading Halton Arp will make sense , there are images there as well :X ... it will start to make sense after that
black holes are non existent by singularity itself , no need of any other arguments , point blank period
Do you think you could made a video of all the important telescopes in space?
Your channel is one of the few that always pleases with quality. The information is presented clearly and professionally. Keep it up! 🏆🦎♀️
surprise suprise
Far our what a definition
A theory built on theories is a weak theory.
@@VectorMonz Theories -- in science -- are based on independently verifiable observations or experiments, have withstood challenges for a material amount of time and whose predictions about the outcomes of future experiments and observations are accurate. This is why Einstein's Special and General Theories of Relativity are Theories and not hypotheses or conjectures. Hypotheses based theories still must be independently verified, etc.
my corona , my Sharona
Basically an icy pole that reflect's the ocean that create's it,the ice in another condenced by gravity state can only reflect within its body of water and vapour/dust envelope as it cant escape the gravity or crash through heavier particles closer to the black hole(crust like energies)
Hey anton what is your outro music?
Greetings Wonderful Person. I am Anton’s personal assistant, Android ZNH-39. I regret to inform you that the information you’ve requested has been labeled as CLASSIFIED by the scientific consensus and understanding methodologies group (SCUM) and thus your query cannot be sufficiently processed unless you provide irrefutable evidence of … ok nevermind, I’m lying. I don’t know…
@ Hello fellow Wonderful Person, why☹️
It's in the description.
@@user-Aaron-no its not, thats literally why im asking. He put everything imaginable there except that.
@@user-Aaron-ooohh you are right, I didnt know there was this much you could put, im used to the show more drop down and didnt realize you could scroll past that, thank dawg.
Merry Christmas to you and your family. May your troubles be less and your blessings be more and nothing but happiness come through your door. 😊
Janus model predicted it :) it's time to read it Anton !
What if wormholes were real. What would be gravitational affects what would be affects on light. Would earas of gravity be linked strong other would be with no explanation
Sounds sketchy. I bet 1000$ that in 50 years this will be disproven.
dear anton would you like to say something abt drones that are not there and not dangerous but we dont know what they are or where they're from
whatever we may think they are not dangerous
The black holes seperate small universes on different time zones
I saw so 65 years ago, 72 today
Hello wonderful Anton, this is person.
🥰
Black Hole Corona. I thought it was a new beer. 😂
I can't get Soundgarden out of my head 😂
What determines the colour and geometry of the sun dog seen when you point a camera directly at the sun?
ahhh ahh.. CORONA ? charged particles. electric fields.. electric fields stick in the gullet of gate keepers astronomers as their crap BBT crumbles
✨🕯️🤩💫✨
the preview image reminds me of what we think the 4th dimension would look like if we could observe it
We live in 4-dimentional spacetime as shown by Einstein & Minkowski. The first 3 dimensions are spacial and the 4th is time. The 4 dimensions cannot be separated from each other. They are "interwoven." We do know a few things about spacetime such as the faster you travel in the 3 spacial dimensions the slower you travel in time.
🕳
My
My
My Corona.
The Knacks
Black hole corona is saying this is the rhythm of the night
I predict that, if white holes do exist, they are seen either as stars or black holes in most cases, as the matter they continuously expel condenses around the white hole, eventually just collapsing into a black hole where it just becomes a white hole in another dimension. It's like the white hole is a giant worm eating it's way through dimensions, linking them together with its mass.
That's an awesome visual
Isn't our own galaxy basically doing what it does because we're being draw into a black hole 🕳️?
No, we’re _orbiting_ it. (The supermassive black hole at the centre of our galaxy) only stuff very very close to it will be drawn into it.
The black hole acts like a relief valve for matter, on unimaginable scales obviously, that allows stars to form at just “the right” rate. History of the Universe had a good video on it a few months ago. Galaxies, and us, are possible because of black holes, if it’s true.
Precisely, we are balanced between a black hole at the center (Sagittarius A*) and the dark matter halo that circles the galaxy. In a dance between 1 explainable gravitational anomaly, and 1 we’re still trying to explain.
Black holes aren’t a vacuum. You don’t get sucked into a black hole any more than we get sucked into the sun.
Why, and how does a Black Hole Spin?
Why? Because the theory that predicted it (Einstein's Relativity) requires it to conserve angular momentum.
Momentum is hella important to getting the GR equations to work.
How? Well.... Any experiments necessary to tell that would be inconveniently located behind a one-way-only information barrier.
There are some who speculate it becomes something akin to the "angular momentum" of quantum particles like the electron. Which in itself is too weird to describe with macroscopic language.
I'd recommend watching a video to understand. But all astrophysical bodies have some degree of rotation because of how they form due to gravity, and like the other commenter said, momentum is conserved.
Pressure mediation of the electromagnetic field.
‘We may’, ‘very likely’ So basically a pointless video. More nonsense. More unprovable ideas. I mean who cares really. With what’s going on on this planet there’s far more important things to resolve. Black hole shape isn’t one of them. Pointless expenditure of resources.
When I was in high school, a black hole was still a myth.
Wow, you must be really old! LaPlace first predicted their existence mathematically in the early 1800s.