@Xaviar 77versus99 the study of art made the notion viable, since Hegel was fervent about the 'logic' of the (morality) of the state, he defines ethics this way. The world spirit was history and yet art (and philosophy and even politics) changes - Hegel tries to squircle this (square plus circle...giggles).
Yes, Hegel's use of a dialectic style which often aims for an "upshot" out of a contradiction (what he calls 'sublation') isn't something he ever talks about in terms of a thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Gustav Emil Mueller has a good article on this legend: "The Hegel Legend of "'Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis.'" Interestingly, even though the language comes from Fichte, Fichte never talks about in relation to anything regarding the dialectic. This seems like a myth which Hegelians put forward to combat another myth. Kinda funny imo
That's because they're Fichte's terms not Hegel's. The idea that this is the dialectic is probably behind a kinda of weirdly anti-dynamic understanding of Hegel that's pretty prevalent because it fits in well with a more analytical approach to philosophy. If Fichte is T+A= S then Hegel is more similar to Inner meets the Outer changing the Inner and the Outer who now meet each other again. Or I O -> I'-O' -> I''-O'', where each prime represents a taking of the other into itself and a development based on that. Another way to represent each link in the process is something like I -> O -> I'. That should look a little familiar to anyone aware of the most famous Hegelian to a similar form, M-C-M'.
In ultimately realizing the inner-outer opposition is an illusion, or in a more Hegelian sense is not the absolute, sure, but he wasn't the first person to think that and his specific program, and explication of the meaning of this insight, are fairly lacking.
@@Cuthloch I was refering to specifically the Hegelian sense of spirit, which obviously doesn't include the Kantian metaphysics since it predates it, but still is the logical endpoint to both philosophers reasoning in a sense.
As far as I'm aware, Hegel actually barely wrote about thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis. It may be useful as a learning scaffold, however.
@Xaviar 77versus99 the study of art made the notion viable, since Hegel was fervent about the 'logic' of the (morality) of the state, he defines ethics this way. The world spirit was history and yet art (and philosophy and even politics) changes - Hegel tries to squircle this (square plus circle...giggles).
Nick, yes he did not talk much about those triads, but they are super useful, and I think they illustrate his philosophy very well.
Yes, Hegel's use of a dialectic style which often aims for an "upshot" out of a contradiction (what he calls 'sublation') isn't something he ever talks about in terms of a thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Gustav Emil Mueller has a good article on this legend: "The Hegel Legend of "'Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis.'" Interestingly, even though the language comes from Fichte, Fichte never talks about in relation to anything regarding the dialectic. This seems like a myth which Hegelians put forward to combat another myth. Kinda funny imo
That's because they're Fichte's terms not Hegel's. The idea that this is the dialectic is probably behind a kinda of weirdly anti-dynamic understanding of Hegel that's pretty prevalent because it fits in well with a more analytical approach to philosophy. If Fichte is T+A= S then Hegel is more similar to Inner meets the Outer changing the Inner and the Outer who now meet each other again. Or I O -> I'-O' -> I''-O'', where each prime represents a taking of the other into itself and a development based on that. Another way to represent each link in the process is something like I -> O -> I'. That should look a little familiar to anyone aware of the most famous Hegelian to a similar form, M-C-M'.
I think visualisng it as a "wave" or "molten lava" is better
The background narration is closer and truer to Hegel's great system than what the professor says at the end.
Excellent thought
patterns are always pattern of patterns
Eggs within eggs
Yeah for like one month
ACID, MAN
Excellent video. Please, the source should be cited in the description.
Christianity was right all along. Rene Girard show it.
So Spinoza was right all along
In ultimately realizing the inner-outer opposition is an illusion, or in a more Hegelian sense is not the absolute, sure, but he wasn't the first person to think that and his specific program, and explication of the meaning of this insight, are fairly lacking.
@@Cuthloch I was refering to specifically the Hegelian sense of spirit, which obviously doesn't include the Kantian metaphysics since it predates it, but still is the logical endpoint to both philosophers reasoning in a sense.
wtf is this music
your mind on Hegel