Sir In today's cricket all conditions are favorable to batsman there is no equality between bowlers and batsman Pitches are getting flatter , bowl is becoming hard and good for batsmanONLY In drs also if ball hits the stump even then it is not assured that batsmna will out so we have to Change many rules in favour for bowlers and make this wonderful game equal like before times
sir, aur ak dusra problem bhi hai . the problem is - aj kal lbw out ke rule mey agar ball leg side ke bahar girte hai , aur woh agar batsman ke andar akar pad par bhi lagge toh out nhi hoga . Yeh rule off-spinner or (other bowlers who use to swing the bowl from off side to leg side ) ke liye toh thik hi hai but , leg spinners or ( other bowlers who use to swing/spin the bowl from leg side to off side ) ke liye bohot muskil ho jata hai . Because , since many years , it was One of the strategy of leg spinners...
Definitely what you explained makes sense and I agree with it... Hopefully in future ICC can implement your idea here and go with it... It will definitely be much more clear for every one
I don't agree when the ball is hitting less than 50% it's not necessarily missing the stumps it's a 50/50 chance thats why they go with umpires call if it's hitting more than 50% that's sure if it's missing that's sure but when it's hitting less than 50% there is no certainty so going with the umpires call is only logical option
Sir, I'm too agree with u 👍..bt I think there is question of umpire's importance or reputation..that u said at the beginning..why UDRS changed to DRS..🤔
Sir, I think your opinion is absolutely correct about impact & pitching but About hitting i think it's correct because if we are less than 50% sure about technology then you can't just ruin bowler's efforts as we all know bowling is more harder than batting. So I think with less than 50% it's correct to go with empire's call. But one more thing to add that empires should also think unbiased, like if one time he has given advantage to batting team for being unsure (less than 50%) then next time he should advantage bowling team. That's what I think.
Being a leg-spinner , I can realize the problem... This was One of our main strategy by which we can take wickets. But , now its now More .... Therefore, it becomes a huge problem for us....🙏🙏🙏😔😔😔😔😔
I also agree with the discrapency regarding umpire's call on hitting the wickets with less than 50% being "on field call", but if we eliminate that and say if less than 50%, regardless of umpire's call it is not out then we are adding another rule that further favors the batsman in an overall batsman friendly game considering the rule changes with free hits in recent years. A suggestion from my side is, if we do bring in this rule, LBW rule overall should be re-considered to not factor in pitching and impact. As long as the ball goes in and hits the wicket (considering no bat involved), regardless of the bowlers side of bowling, pitching and impact this will make things considerably easy and also make it easy for on-field umps to make the call. this could also further ensure they pay more attention with the additional split second they have to check the front foot no-ball. just a food for thought.
Sir totally agree with you 💯 there wouldn't be any excuse for a team or player if this style of drs system is established especially no ball system, this would be fair style of cricket
I think you are right here. Even I was not into Sachin sir's opinion as it was absurd on his part to talk childishly about the DRS thing. Yes, LBWs are often confusing these days.... I think the rule where you said about 50+% of the ball hitting the wickets= out and
Why does normally batsman get more MOM or series awards as compared to bowler..we see a batsman who scores 70+ receives 🏆 but a bowler who took 4 wickets doesn't receive it
cricket is such a batsmen driven sport from pitches to stadium sizes and DRS percentages.. I find that its harder to become a legendary bowler as compared to a legendary batsmen
Aakash sir I think that logically speaking with your statement "if we going with technology let's go whole heartedly" So we should calculate that what amount of ball hits the stump to dislodge the bails (whatever amount 10 or 20%) and then see what hawk-eye shows and decide whether the batsman is out or not out
I am with you snd your opinion and your opinions are good especially the no ball and lbw one as many no balls are missed by the on field umpires but the main problem is that it will consume time as if there is no ball then third umpire will check then he will tell to on field umpire then they will tell to the bowlers and batsman and it will consume more time.Another one is everytime if there is a lbw call then we have to go to 3rd umpire then they will check no ball, snicko, Ball tracking then they will give their descion and it will consume more time as compared to the now being held. If you can first start it in domestic cricket then take it to international level.This much i want to say @cricketaakash #aakashvani #thankyoudrs
Agree with akash bhai. it was very bad umpiring in 1st test eng vs wi. I think some how DRS like's WI as we seen last year in wc19. WI used to many DRS while playing
Yes agree with you Akash. If Anil Kumble would have played during DRS era he would have got more wickets. That is why players of different should not be compared.
I was always with this decision i have also many times mentioned it if it should legalize by icc it would be really beneficial for ballers in the modern era where batting dominates
Bilkul sahi baat he aapki i completely agree wth u sir, aur mera 1 Sujaav he ki hotspot ko bhi india me Applicable karana chahiye why don't We use hotspot in india ?? I think is pr behes honi chahiye...!!
Ah, finally I got one right. I guessed it had to be a spinner who bowls stump to stump and has a faster delivery. And someone who has taken loads of wickets, cos only them LBW will be a lot. So it had to be our Kumble :-)
I don't know why don't icc change this umpire call. In 2019 wc semi finals kohli was given lbw and it was umpire call. If umpire had given not out India would won the match
@@abdulhadi8915 cummins boult amir grandhome richardson anyone of them inn kohli out 🤣🤣 And where the ball swings they indian batsman can't even touch the ball
Aap LBW ki origination dekhiye ki kyu LBW ko introduce kiya gaya tha!! Taki players deliberately ball ko stumps pe jaane se naa roke!! Abb vo deliberate hai ki nhi yeh toh on-field umpire hii bata sakta hai!! So, 50%se less ho toh umpire's call hona hii chaiye!!
I think the current rule of the 50% hitting is correct. The machines are error prone and accuracy can't be 100% all the time. So when hitting projection prediction is above 50%, it can be trusted as the chances of error is very less but when below 50% the chances of error is high so the decision of next trustworthy which is the umpire needs to considered. It will stay the same unless machines are 100% reliable.
the present DRS laws are perfect and I don't want to explain why because if you had some basic knowledge of cameras and fps you wouldn't have raised such silly questions on DRS .
Semifinals of 2019 wc ind vs nz.... Kohli the batsman... The ball hits 5 percent of stumps.... It is out.... Finals.... Roy the batsman.... Ball hits 45 percent of stumps.... It is not out.... How... Rubbish.... And these were big games
I totally agree with Sachin sir, if DRS shows ball hitting stump, batsman should be given out, then no matter whatever % the ball hits the stump and what was decision given by onfield umpire.
Sir, I think whatever sachin sir told is absolutely right. Now a days cricket becomes batsman's game. Aap ne jo kaha ki agar stumps pe 5%-10% ball lagti hai to not out hona chahiye kyu ki technology ka thoda error maan k chalte hai. But ye bowler k bare mei soch k to boliye. Technology mei thoda error k wajah se whi 5%-10% to 50%-60% bhi to ho skta hai na.. Ap ne aisa kyu maan liye ki jo 5-10% lagegi wo miss kr skta hai?? Wo miss v kr skta hai aur stumps mei 100% v lag skta hai. Cricket mei baht kuch batsman k support mei hote aa rha hai. It's time to change this. Kuch to bowlers ko advantage mile.
![[Live] : ONE 169 วันนี้!! "อนาโตลี vs อูมาร์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3YZVWuFJg/mqdefault.jpg)
Sir I am totally with your opinion about DRS
Same with me.
Nice sir
Sir in the hitting percentage the error may be in any ways 25% hitting might also mean 55% hitting actually , that's why umpires call
Sir
In today's cricket all conditions are favorable to batsman there is no equality between bowlers and batsman
Pitches are getting flatter , bowl is becoming hard and good for batsmanONLY
In drs also if ball hits the stump even then it is not assured that batsmna will out so we have to Change many rules in favour for bowlers and make this wonderful game equal like before times
And now bowlers cant apply saliva so less swing.
*DRS = Dhoni Review System By Aakash* 👍
sir, aur ak dusra problem bhi hai . the problem is - aj kal lbw out ke rule mey agar ball leg side ke bahar girte hai , aur woh agar batsman ke andar akar pad par bhi lagge toh out nhi hoga .
Yeh rule off-spinner or (other bowlers who use to swing the bowl from off side to leg side ) ke liye toh thik hi hai but , leg spinners or ( other bowlers who use to swing/spin the bowl from leg side to off side ) ke liye bohot muskil ho jata hai . Because , since many years , it was One of the strategy of leg spinners...
Sir I totally agree with your anylisation about drs
Thanks for spreading your views
Definitely what you explained makes sense and I agree with it... Hopefully in future ICC can implement your idea here and go with it... It will definitely be much more clear for every one
Sir ek Baar aap Duckworth luisturn method ( DLS) par viedio banyiye na PLEASE,👋👋👋
@Pushpak barabar bhai
Vaise aapka naam Pushpak aur mera pushkar
I don't agree when the ball is hitting less than 50% it's not necessarily missing the stumps it's a 50/50 chance thats why they go with umpires call if it's hitting more than 50% that's sure if it's missing that's sure but when it's hitting less than 50% there is no certainty so going with the umpires call is only logical option
I agree with you.
These complications make cricket different.
Yah rule sabse jyada bhaukali lagta hai
Love from Pakistan. Aakash bhai i love your voice.
The problem with drs is that it is just a prediction which doesn't have 100% accuracy. So umpires call is just for that error.
Sir, I'm too agree with u 👍..bt I think there is question of umpire's importance or reputation..that u said at the beginning..why UDRS changed to DRS..🤔
Absolutely right sir
th-cam.com/video/S1baOlfELE8/w-d-xo.html
I know Trivia
Answer:Anil Kumble
Sir why did not giveing runs when umpire say lbw out but the original decision is not out.
That will be unfair for bowling side
Great question
Sir I have a question
When the ball pitching is in leg side than why umpire did not give a lbw?
@@arpitjain9049 It's blind spot for human
Yes always in my mind they just dead the ball
Sir, I think your opinion is absolutely correct about impact & pitching but About hitting i think it's correct because if we are less than 50% sure about technology then you can't just ruin bowler's efforts as we all know bowling is more harder than batting. So I think with less than 50% it's correct to go with empire's call.
But one more thing to add that empires should also think unbiased, like if one time he has given advantage to batting team for being unsure (less than 50%) then next time he should advantage bowling team. That's what I think.
my Aakash chopra ji very handsome very beautiful very great commentr
Being a leg-spinner , I can realize the problem...
This was One of our main strategy by which we can take wickets. But , now its now More .... Therefore, it becomes a huge problem for us....🙏🙏🙏😔😔😔😔😔
Sir, I am with you
I also agree with the discrapency regarding umpire's call on hitting the wickets with less than 50% being "on field call", but if we eliminate that and say if less than 50%, regardless of umpire's call it is not out then we are adding another rule that further favors the batsman in an overall batsman friendly game considering the rule changes with free hits in recent years. A suggestion from my side is, if we do bring in this rule, LBW rule overall should be re-considered to not factor in pitching and impact. As long as the ball goes in and hits the wicket (considering no bat involved), regardless of the bowlers side of bowling, pitching and impact this will make things considerably easy and also make it easy for on-field umps to make the call. this could also further ensure they pay more attention with the additional split second they have to check the front foot no-ball. just a food for thought.
Completely agree with all your points on the DRS!
Question - Muttiah Muralidharan
Fun Fact - He has taken the most wickets in test and ODI (800) (534)
Anil kumble
He said with lbw
@@manavdeepsingh3130 yup I know
Sir please make an interview of famous White ball legend VVS Laxman
Sir totally agree with you 💯 there wouldn't be any excuse for a team or player if this style of drs system is established especially no ball system, this would be fair style of cricket
Sir, a trivia for you:
What was common between the Indian and Sri Lankan innings in 2011 world cup?
Bata bhai answer
Both the innings ended with a six!
Akash bhaiya talk to m.s
Match was fixed.
Both PLAYED TILL FINAL
बहुत अच्छी बात कही आपने, सर....👌👌
Lbw के नियमों में संशोधन की आवश्यकता है....
For Palyer.....DRS: Decision Reaview System.😇
For Indian.....DRS:Dhoni Review System.😇🥳🥳🥳🥳
🔔
th-cam.com/video/JB8ZErJdxwQ/w-d-xo.html
@@nutansharma5471 😂
dhobi review system
I think you are right here. Even I was not into Sachin sir's opinion as it was absurd on his part to talk childishly about the DRS thing. Yes, LBWs are often confusing these days.... I think the rule where you said about 50+% of the ball hitting the wickets= out and
Why does normally batsman get more MOM or series awards as compared to bowler..we see a batsman who scores 70+ receives 🏆 but a bowler who took 4 wickets doesn't receive it
Right great question
nope beacuse as a batsman u have only 1 chance , as bowlooer u have unlimited chances in test , 60 chances in ode and 24 in t20....
@@asimhemrom6143 nope
I agree with Sachin sir
Cricket is getting only batsman's game
Notification aaya Chale aaye guruji🙏🙏
Very good morning Aakash Vani ❤️
th-cam.com/video/L-bVAZau0ZA/w-d-xo.html
We have seen so many blenders in umpiring in the match between West Indies and England
They also got rusted in the lockdown...
Not rusted ecb fulled their pockets with bucks
Because they are English umpires so they give more decisions in favour of the England
@@mohammadzaid5292 100% agreed
@@shabeebah9073 yeah 😭
Sir, you are right. Now it's time to change drs system.
Obviously, Sir the LBW Law will be changed in the future.
'impact' wala point bilkul sahi hai 💯👍
Virat kohli in world cup 2019 in semi final lbw umpire's fall😭😭😭
😡😡😱😱😱😭saddest moment of my life in cricket.
@@RJ-zd6sq don't worry bro king kohli will definitely win world cup 2023 India
It'call not fall
@@akashgoel7014 king kohli hater spotted
This was not fair with India
cricket is such a batsmen driven sport from pitches to stadium sizes and DRS percentages.. I find that its harder to become a legendary bowler as compared to a legendary batsmen
hello sir
if the ball hits the stumps then i ideally feel that the division should be
30% or less= not out
more than30%=out
In my opinion, in case of hitting wickets umpire's call should be considered but in case of pitching and impact I totally agree with you.
Sir, add caption to this video so ICC can watch this video and think about of changing this LBW law .
0:33
Beautifully explained sir you are Gem 🙏
Aakash sir I think that logically speaking with your statement "if we going with technology let's go whole heartedly"
So we should calculate that what amount of ball hits the stump to dislodge the bails (whatever amount 10 or 20%) and then see what hawk-eye shows and decide whether the batsman is out or not out
Because Sachin is the beneficiary of DRS when he was not given out on Saeed ajmal ball in semi final 2011 wc
If umpire call gets overuled in DRS then team will get out for less than 200 so many batsmen survive due to umpire call
But umpire call is not not good rule. When umpire ask third umpire then there should be no need of umpire call
I am with you snd your opinion and your opinions are good especially the no ball and lbw one as many no balls are missed by the on field umpires but the main problem is that it will consume time as if there is no ball then third umpire will check then he will tell to on field umpire then they will tell to the bowlers and batsman and it will consume more time.Another one is everytime if there is a lbw call then we have to go to 3rd umpire then they will check no ball, snicko, Ball tracking then they will give their descion and it will consume more time as compared to the now being held. If you can first start it in domestic cricket then take it to international level.This much i want to say @cricketaakash #aakashvani #thankyoudrs
0:33 legend anil kumble
Vai can be easily replaced as "Y" 😝 or maybe spelled as WHY. 😜
Vai or bhai?
th-cam.com/video/S1baOlfELE8/w-d-xo.html
sir what can we do to cange some rules in cricket
plz request icc officials to apply the lbw changes
i would love to see the new changes
Make another version of this reason being ICC ko hindi samaj nhi ayegi.
#Important
mjhy aj tak lbw ka pta e nh chala k aesa ku hota hai r mery mind me yeh swal tha jo k sachin ny jawab dy dia.thanks.lv frm pakistan.
ODI me 250-270 me jo maza aata tha wo aaj 300 - 350 me nhi aata 😥😥
I agree ....sare flat pitches hote hai aab....bating oriented pitches
th-cam.com/video/JB8ZErJdxwQ/w-d-xo.html
Maza to dono me ata h.
Jb team 210-40 defend kr le
Jb team 330-60 chase kr le
Sahi bola bhai. 2019 world cup final me 241 score tha. Bhot maza aaya tha run chase me..
I don't agree with you high scoring game are also necessary in Cricket because entertainment level becomes double in high scoring games
I agree on the part that there should be no Umpire's Call on Impact.
But on hitting it is good currently.
Sir, I agree with you about DRS
Right ..👍
Agree with akash bhai. it was very bad umpiring in 1st test eng vs wi. I think some how DRS like's WI as we seen last year in wc19. WI used to many DRS while playing
Oh I was right mr. Kumble when u told that he is a spinner....
Yes agree with you Akash. If Anil Kumble would have played during DRS era he would have got more wickets. That is why players of different should not be compared.
DRS: Decision review system
For me ,DRS:Dhoni review system 😍😍
Chopa ho ja dana a loho dhoni review sytem chopa chotiya
Dhoni very bad player
th-cam.com/video/JB8ZErJdxwQ/w-d-xo.html
Totally agree with you Sir.
First udrs
Then drs
Then first and last "DHONI REVIEW SYSTEM" ❤❤
Sharma ji ka damad bas andha hai
I agree you....
I was always with this decision i have also many times mentioned it if it should legalize by icc it would be really beneficial for ballers in the modern era where batting dominates
Bilkul sahi baat he aapki i completely agree wth u sir,
aur mera 1 Sujaav he ki hotspot ko bhi india me Applicable karana chahiye why don't We use hotspot in india ?? I think is pr behes honi chahiye...!!
I always dislike those comments,which compares two players
Yes sir you told absolutely right.
Love u sir proud to be a subscriber I am the one who subscribed him when he was having 1 k subs
In wi eng tast match 2020 many umpire's dicitions are changed by DRS
Ah, finally I got one right. I guessed it had to be a spinner who bowls stump to stump and has a faster delivery. And someone who has taken loads of wickets, cos only them LBW will be a lot. So it had to be our Kumble :-)
No it's Muttiah Murlidharan
@@Kartik_Diwakar No
Sir totally agree with you.........
Sir, I would surely like to see you lighting a candle on England as Joe root returns
bhai plx channel ko support karo
Great thinker
I don't know why don't icc change this umpire call. In 2019 wc semi finals kohli was given lbw and it was umpire call. If umpire had given not out India would won the match
Right
,🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sonam kapoor no ball
he was out anyway
@@abdulhadi8915 cummins boult amir grandhome richardson
anyone of them inn kohli out 🤣🤣
And where the ball swings they indian batsman can't even touch the ball
Aap LBW ki origination dekhiye ki kyu LBW ko introduce kiya gaya tha!!
Taki players deliberately ball ko stumps pe jaane se naa roke!!
Abb vo deliberate hai ki nhi yeh toh on-field umpire hii bata sakta hai!!
So, 50%se less ho toh umpire's call hona hii chaiye!!
Anil kumble🙂156 wickets by LBW(I'M NOT SURE)
Yes......Mr. Akash you are right.
looking forward to 3TPL starting on 18th 😋
In thumbnail picture would it be overturned to OUT or Will it be stayed as NOT OUT?
Sir pls invite DADA on your show 😍
Breakfast with champion dekha kya😍
Akash it's very easy to lecturate on these... The umpire which stands on field has the most important job to do
Who is better? 1.udrs. 2.drs. Drs waale like karen.
I think the current rule of the 50% hitting is correct.
The machines are error prone and accuracy can't be 100% all the time. So when hitting projection prediction is above 50%, it can be trusted as the chances of error is very less but when below 50% the chances of error is high so the decision of next trustworthy which is the umpire needs to considered. It will stay the same unless machines are 100% reliable.
the present DRS laws are perfect and I don't want to explain why because if you had some basic knowledge of cameras and fps you wouldn't have raised such silly questions on DRS .
Bilkul sir, you are right...
Dhoni review system
lauda system
@@shadabkhan9026 tu lauda
Who played the best innings?
1 R Jadeja77(59)- WC2019=LIKE
2 H Pandya 76(43)-CT2017= comment
Semifinals of 2019 wc ind vs nz.... Kohli the batsman... The ball hits 5 percent of stumps.... It is out.... Finals.... Roy the batsman.... Ball hits 45 percent of stumps.... It is not out.... How... Rubbish.... And these were big games
the changes which you said are absolutely correct and perfect
i hope ICC makes these changes
It seems that Sachin don't want others to score more runs than him 😜
Sachin ko bhi kitne baar galat out dia gya agar ni dete to sachin ke bhi 20000 test runs hota aur tennis elbow and back problem bhi thi
@@sourabhdebnath685 isliye soch rha Hoga Sachin paji 😎🤗
Mai v yhi soch rha tha shyd kohli ko Dekh Kar 😎🤣😃
Sachin Sir is Right that ball the ball hitss the stumps No matter how many percent the batsman should be given out
Batsman can play any shot in any style ,then why bowler cant get LBW through leg side angle
Very logical suggestion ! good job man . Really hope ICC see this .
I totally agree with Sachin sir, if DRS shows ball hitting stump, batsman should be given out, then no matter whatever % the ball hits the stump and what was decision given by onfield umpire.
Sir, I agree with your opinion
i agree with u sir
Boundary se ball thoda touch ho ya pura boundary dilata hai
I don't like that umpire's call thing... Your theory is utterly right.
Sir, I think whatever sachin sir told is absolutely right. Now a days cricket becomes batsman's game. Aap ne jo kaha ki agar stumps pe 5%-10% ball lagti hai to not out hona chahiye kyu ki technology ka thoda error maan k chalte hai. But ye bowler k bare mei soch k to boliye. Technology mei thoda error k wajah se whi 5%-10% to 50%-60% bhi to ho skta hai na.. Ap ne aisa kyu maan liye ki jo 5-10% lagegi wo miss kr skta hai?? Wo miss v kr skta hai aur stumps mei 100% v lag skta hai. Cricket mei baht kuch batsman k support mei hote aa rha hai. It's time to change this. Kuch to bowlers ko advantage mile.
I think the present system is good.
As DRS purpose is to remove howlers.
Near miss cases should not be an issue to any team
Akasha choprs sir .....apka new name........cricket Google ...hats of u sir
Totally agree akash sir
This should be heaven for DRS in few times
Very nice, agree with you.....
I understand about pitching outside leg stump... But why isn't impact outside off stump not out??
110% agree with you sir. absolutely agree with no cross question.
Absolutely agree sir. Absolutely like anything. I have been crying out for the same for a long time.