Introduction to Dynamic Panel GMM: Video 1 of 5.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
  • This video provides a basic, easy-to-understand introduction to Dynamic Panel GMM estimation. It is the 1st of a 5-part series ending with how to use EViews to estimate Difference GMM and System GMM. Please watch all five videos to learn the development of the concepts and models. Thank you.
    System GMM: • System GMM: Video 5 of 5
    Difference GMM: • Difference GMM and Sys...
    Results & Diagnostics: • Interpretation of Pane...
    Persistence effect (lagged dependent variable): • The Persistence Effect...

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @abbakpa
    @abbakpa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i dont know where this video was when i was looking everywhere to learn this model, thank god i finally found it. very easy to understand and well detailed

  • @salamdenilsonsingh5150
    @salamdenilsonsingh5150 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I was looking for a video talking about GMM and Prof. uploading the video at the right moment. Thanks Prof. Pat Obi.

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are welcome!

  • @abdullahbinomar3390
    @abdullahbinomar3390 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    waiting next parts of this series impatiently... 🙂

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Part 2 is just published: th-cam.com/video/gODby64xXsE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZWxU17azB4izqg4w

  • @innocentwilly6216
    @innocentwilly6216 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, Prof., for clarity

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are welcome

  • @AccountingPianoHanhDung
    @AccountingPianoHanhDung หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much

  • @jonahgo7743
    @jonahgo7743 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you!

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're welcome!

  • @lehuy7279
    @lehuy7279 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the endogeneity problem, we will often use IV and 2SLS models for static estimates and GMM types for dynamic estimates, right?

  • @MuhammadBilal-nv4dz
    @MuhammadBilal-nv4dz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    if we include year fixed effect it should be w(t) ot w(i)?

  • @gaalichemakram8879
    @gaalichemakram8879 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    please what tests shoud use to detect endogeneity, heteroscedasticité and serail corelation in this case, thanks

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Please watch the entire series, especially the last two videos (4 & 5). By NOT rejecting H0 of overidentifying restrictions, you are, in essence, confirming no endogeneity. The Arellano-Bond test of NO serial correlation is based on AR(2), which is shown. The two estimators (D-GMM & S-GMM) are robust for heteroskedasticity due to the GLS waiting that is applied in the estimation. Hope this helps.

    • @gaalichemakram8879
      @gaalichemakram8879 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PatObi thanks doc, i have watching many times all video it s very very herpful and comprhensive and i always refers to yours video, but i asked if i want to justify that my model need a Gmm estmation in general which a have endogeneity , heteroscedasti and serial correlation