Generally yes, and it is recommended to refuse for multiple reasons, including possible charges they could try to stick to anything...planted evidence, and they aren't liable for damage caused by the search....but if they have a warrant, probable cause to arrest (can search or "inventory" an inpinded vehicle) or if there is probable cause a life is in immediate danger Not a lawyer not legal advice
Watch the series if you haven't yet. To put it simply the officer asking to search is named Nolan. He(the character not the actor) started off ok but ended up being more of a nuisance/asshole in the end. The series name is "The Rookie."
I am not black so it is not the same experience for me at ALL so I cannot compare, but even for me cops are terrifying. I was walking to work at night (I can't drive) and I had bright red hair and two cops stopped me on my way to work saying I look suspicious and 'fit the description" I had thick, curly RED HAIR with bangs and a flower decoration in my hair. I didn't look like ANYONE dude. I dressed super unique! They asked for my identification and proof, I luckily had my cvs uniform in my bag. It was SO crazy and such a lie. I was like shaking. Going to work after that sucked and I was late bc of them. :/
@@phoenixastra4429You don't have to be black for your experience to be valid. I'm sorry that happened to you and hope things go better for you! Unfortunately, over time, police have gotten extremely ballsy when it comes to power tripping.
She did actually break the law, unless the guns were given to her, or they were in her possession already...she stole the guns from her ex-husband. It's fucked up, but you can't take something that isn't yours without consent of the owner. If her ex was threatening to kill her with knives, she couldn't just go into his house and take his knives from him to turn into the police.
@SmileyFace123Lolz if she isn't registered to the address then she shouldn't have a key. She still committed theft, and that's still a crime. Regardless of how she felt,she needs to record and report the concerns, if she was a law abiding citizen, there was nothing stopping her buying her own gun...
You do realize it’s still breaking and entering if you use a old key? She doesn’t have permission to be there so it’s still a crime. She just admitted to 3 crimes, like yes he’s the antagonist but he correctly did what was required. She didn’t even want to mention her taking the guns to the police station at first so they would even rise a neutral cop.
@@socketyellow3Edit: touched up on my American law a bit more, and I was incorrect. Trespass and breaking + entering are very different where I live. Assumed it was similar over the water
Breaking and entering, violating a restraining order, stolen property, stolen firearms. Even if she didn't consent to the search she would have been arrested for the same crimes. She could have filed a GVRO, which the investigation or weather or not its needed is done AFTER they take the guns, and if it was proved to be true his guns would be gone forever and never given back. She is in the wrong, the cop also asked if she consented so that was up to her...
@@zacharybateman2606 well yes, except if she hadn't volunteered where she got the guns or given the officers permission to search the car, her crimes wouldn't have been discovered.
@danielbrandstetter8713 incorrect because if you are turning in guns they will do background checks to see if those guns actually belong to you or if you have a license to please able to own a gun. All guns have a serial number. They would run it. Figure out they are not hers, ask her why she is trying to turn in guns that aren't hers, and seeing as her intentions were to try and get her ex husband arrested for allegedly threatening her she would probably waste no time telling them.... and on top of all of this. Just because your crime isn't found out does NOT mean your in the right XD, she would still be in the wrong. She was overly nervous for no reason all the cop initially did was just your run of the mill stop. It gave him a suspicion, and In this case he was correct. That intuition may not always be correct and she has the right to deny the search. But the cop did not search without consent was respectful and she violated multiple laws and a couple of which were felonies, she was not in the right.
@gamingwithjd2244 not how that works dude especially if she got a restraining order and then violated it by entering his living space lol 😂 mega illegal
@@gamingwithjd2244 & That's alone is enough for officers to check on him & the status of his firearms. If she had proof he is threatening to kill her, she shows it to the police. They get a warrant for her ex husband, & they take possession of the firearms. Especially if he has a history of abusing her. It would be illegal for him to own them anyways, depending on if their divorce resulted in any Domestic Abuse charges. He is threatening her life, she can stay low & inform the police. That's the best thing to do. NOT go to his residence & commit multiple felonies. (Each stolen firearm is another charge) not to mention breaking & entering or at the very least trespassing. (Petty crimes, but still prosecutable.) Usually, commiting multiple felonies isn't the proper way to protect yourself.
Honestly even if they never pulled her over they would have arrested her at the station when she said where she got the guns. If someone threatens you with a gun, you aren't allowed to break into their house and preemptively steal the gun and then "turn it in" to the police.
I watched this show, it’s called Rookie and it’s on Disney plus. The officer that is saying that she was stealing, is racist. A couple episodes later, when the black officer (not trying to be racist) was getting jumped by people and his partner was just there watching him getting jumped, but the police checked his camera and caught him
Who but the one who was putting charges on them was not being racist at that moment, a episode before this one, he was being racist and gonna arrest a black family for no reason
From the cops perspective they have no way of knowing whether the husband threatened you or not, but you did just confess to burglary, theft of property . . . at the least. Maybe the cops aren’t your friends, maybe don’t answer questions and don’t consent to a search.
@@cindabourgeau4841 then why didn't she just contact the police and show them proof he contacted her so they could arrest him, why did she feel the need to break into his house and steal his property
In this instance everyone is right and wrong because from what people are saying this show makes this cop a racist but in the same hand she committed a felony broke her own restraining order she had instated for her ex and then had unknown intentions for those guns and while she was stating she would turn them in for all any one else knew she was going to shoot her ex.
@Walter-white891 Okay, same rules apply the other way around. She could've been going to the police station, or she could've been otw to kill someone. Better not to take the chance
The police aren't allowed to do things because they theorize something might happen. They're only allowed to act on reasonable and readily apparent wrongdoing. That's how it's supposed to work. So, no, everyone is supposed to be mad at this cop character. He's out of line and probably racist.
people don’t realize how wrong is it is for a gunowner to have theirs stolen like that, when she keeps them (unlicensed and not registered to herself) and kills someone it’s her ex husband that’s going to prison for it as well as her
Frrr, she technically was on the wrong and did approve of the search. I hate when they make it some how "racist" it's not she was wrong for what he said possession of stolen property and transferring the guns
@Anti-furry482 She could've filed a GVRO (Gun Violence Restraining Order) weather or not he actually did anything wrong the cops would have immediately went and taken his guns until it was declared he was guilty or innocent and withing the mental ability to possess guns at that time. If it was found out that he was threatening her he never would have gotten them back and went to jail. She was in the wrong on many many levels.
@@Anti-furry482 Her skin color is the only reason why she got pulled over in the first place lol. Did you watch the show? This cop is quite literally racist
Girl I knew, had her ex, who did not live with her anymore, used his key to get into her apartment. I happened to be there at the time and when we attempted to have him arrested for breaking & entering and burglary, cops (Sacramento PD) stated they couldn't do anything since he had a key. If she didn't want him to come in, she should have changed the locks. She went down and filed for an RO the next day. This is not burglary.
It is definitely burglary. Cops don’t know the law buddy, you'd be foolish to think they do. That’s what lawyers are for. It is true that it’s not breaking and entering but no doubt it's still theft…
It is when they don’t live together anymore for one, and for two, leaves with guns that aren’t registered to her, without his knowledge or consent, and three, transports them in her own vehicle. If there was an RO, he would have been made to turn them in as all registered firearms are subject to collection with an issued RO, especially in a domestic situation. It’s no different than breaking into someone’s home because I had a key, stole their guns because they were threatening me. It is burglary and illegal entry Her arrest is justified.
It is when they find live together anymore for one, and for two, leaves with guns that aren’t registered to her, without his knowledge or consent, and three, transports them in her own vehicle. If there was an RO, he would have been made to turn them in as all registered firearms are subject to collection with an issued RO, especially in a domestic situation. It’s no different than breaking into someone’s home because I had a key, stole their guns because they were threatening me. It is burglary and illegal entry Her arrest is justified.
@@waveafterwave0723possibly true in some states, but other states won’t require you to forfeit your property just because someone was successful in getting a restraining order granted.
@@thankuu.smartyUnfortunately not the legal right, because the law has this unfortunate thing where it doesn't give a shit for obvious morality concerns, it's just a set of rigid, immobile statements that can screw someone who is scared for their life over if they take one step out of line. Technically a property theft crime even if it was a logical attempt to neutralize a threat.
@@Juliazx02 she had zero right to break into his house and steal his property, if someone threatens you that does not give you the right to break into their house and steal their guns, how stupid are you? She committed a felony by stealing those guns, if her ex threatens her then she should go to the police, she had a restraining order on him and if she had proof he threatened her then he would of been arrested, if she didn't think the police would do anything then why would she think they would of done anything after she stole his guns, she just would of been arrested at the station and he would of been given his guns back, I mean do you really think if someone threatens you that gives you a right to break into their house and steal their property?
This video is wrong in so many ways. She admitted to theft and having firearms which you probably doesn't have a license for I'm assuming this took place in California
@@Popeyedfreezenope they just ask generic questions and analyze individuals of their behavior and mental state, you just blanketing their occupation only shows your stereotype reliance
She could've gotten away if she just kept her mouth shut and didn't consent to a search. Now, she's incriminated herself by stating that she has a restraining order yet willingly went and illegally entered his house, and took his firearms. Basically she committed 2 felonies + she violated her own restraining order... Even if what she said was true, she's going straight to prison.
She also admitted to breaking into her ex's house and stealing the firearms, stealing firearms is a felony, she had no right to do that even if her ex did threaten her
Show : The rookie Paragraph person !!! So basically it’s officer west and officer bob (forgot his name so we will call him bob) Bob is very raciest and stuff so he arrests this women for having guns in the back bc they aren’t registered, she claims she was returning them but he was very mean to her and stuff and was aggressive
This is a very nuanced scene and that's very rare in modern US TV shows, the white cop is doing his job and being objective she has broken the law multiple times, the young black cop possibly thinks its just racism, now it could be but we don't have any extra context in this video.
He is just being racist. Anyone that’s seen anything from this show knows he’s the racist cop character, but I don’t blame you if you don’t know that. Additionally, most people I’m seeing here are simply criticizing the woman for being an idiot and consenting to the search. No one is saying she was in the right, just that she’s dumb.
Extra context: later in that series that white cop turns off his camera and watches his partner there get beat up by multiple perps and intentionally delays calling for help. Just because from the info here it was the right call doesn’t mean it was for the right reasons.
@@KitK502 Wow that's disappointing and the reason I don't watch this garbage, the leftist progressives have taken full control of American entertainment and they just love racism porn, they can't seem to make any form of entertainment with out the white man bad narrative front and center...
she literally committed burglary, stole firearms and is illegally transporting weapons if that's not a justified arrest i don't know what is but y'all keep crying a river over it
Yea she shouldn’t have consented to a search but also I totally get her getting arrested. She openly admitted to breaking into a home and stealing firearms. Regardless of if she was planing on turning them into the police or not, that’s still theft.
because do you know how cops treat black people? especially black women? he'll she had every right to be fucking worried with how much black people face at the hands of cops
@@LoserHunterthen again, it didn’t show why she was pulled over. Let’s just say she got pulled over because she was thought as suspicious. Personally, I would’ve been pretty worried too if I was randomly pulled over. 🤷♀️
@blank26clover I didn't watch it but I remember the explanation basically the 🖤 cop thought the other one ra . cist and tried to help the woman until it was proven that the woman was in fact going to give the guns to a gang The show did a couple of those situations until the 🖤 cop realized the other cop wasn't ra . cist he just really knew what he was doing TH-cam isn't letting me send wth
She shouldn't of broken into her ex's house and stole his property in the first place lol stealing firearms is a felony, she should of went to the police straight away especially if she had proof he threatened her
The cop IS racist (you'd know if you watched the show). However, he is not in the wrong here at all. I agree that it's best to figure this stuff out inside of a station or court room.
If you watched the show yes he is. He literally beat innocent black people in front of their family, also if I remember correctly tried to frame someone for beating his partner up
Oh no. This cop is absolutely racist. This is one of his more mild actions of stereotyping and discrimination. You would know this if you watched the show instead of playing defense for a character you clearly do not know.
they came up to her for no reason? thats pure rasism, plus she only stole the guns because her ex-husband was threatening to kill her dafuq she had every right to take them away from him💀
Probable Cause 😉 If they are that suspicious, you can still search without consent. It's on the officer to risk an unnecessary search if he doesn'tfind anything.
This clip doesn't show him being racist at all, the lady should of been arrested, she admitted to breaking into her ex's house and stealing his property, also stealing firearms is a felony, if she was really concerned about her ex she should of simply reported it to the police, and since she apparently has a restraining order on him then he would of been arrested, also her story seems suspicious, she's in possession of stolen firearms which is a felony, she claims she was going to turn them into the police but she could of just as likely been going to sell them and using that ex story as cover, it's safer to arrest her and bring her back to the police station so they can do a proper investigation, now the cop could be racist but he is completely justified in this clip to arrest her and he should arrest her, idk why the other cop just wants to let her go because that would be irresponsible and unprofessional and dangerous, "oh this person is driving around with stolen firearms but she told me a good story so I let her go", "oh this person was a kilo of cocaine but they said it was their ex's cocaine and they swore to me that they were going to the police to turn it in to the police so I let them go" he sounds like an amazing cop lol
Some of the comments are saying “you could have just not consent to a search” One of the main points was that she was scared of saying no. Because racist cop is going to racist cop and assume the worst of that no.
Also she has like a 5 year minimum sentence sitting in her trunk? Fuck id be nervous too if I broke into my ex's house, and stole their fuckin firearms haha
@@KreacherServes you can clearly pick up on his comments and tone that he is mistrustful of her Also he did not state any reason why he pulled her over.
@@williammaser the pull over isnt shown in this clip nor does it matter here. Plus hes not required to tell them if they dont ask which she didnt. Also his ton and comments dont really matter. it doesn't matter if hes mistrustful of her lol that can be for any number of reasons one of which being how incredibly nervous she is right away that's huge red flag and warrants mistrust. mistrust /= racism. nothing he does here shows that hes racist the only reason we know that hes racist is because we know about previous actions.
Looking at this from both sides: No, she didn't need to approve the search of her vehicle. No authorization->No search->no arrest. Alternatively, she DID use her old key to get into her ex-husband's place and take his property. Threats or not, you can't steal other people's things. She was being pre-emptive about it, but could have called the police and they would / SHOULD have issued a warrant and removed the guns themselves if it was merited to do so.
Why are they portraying this like the cop is wrong? It would be wrong to force a search/seizure, but asking is always within bounds. She consented. After finding guns and her admitting to stealing them, that's perfect grounds for an arrest. Being arrested isn't the end of the world though. They'll obviously look into everything, and they could easily do more help for her as they look into her allegations of the guy. But, yeah, TV show so drama and politcal narratives are played up.
Yeah she's in possession of stolen firearms which is a felony so obviously she's getting arrested, she claims she's going to turn them into the police but for all they know she's going off to sell them, it's definitely safer to arrest her and bring her back to the station so they can conduct a proper investigation, they could decide not to charge her or only charge her with a misdemeanor and send her on her way if she's being honest, and investigate her ex and possibly arrest him, but no, a cop is apparently racist for doing his job
The officer (played by Brandon Routh) is a racist in the show, but this arrest was solid. Yes he pushed for the search but she agreed to the search and the firearms in the trunk were stolen property that she freely admitted to stealing after breaking into her ex's house.
Thank you for the interesting clip, I'm very curious to see how this plays out so if someone could please tell me the season/episode of this particular story "arc"?? I'd really appreciate it thanks !! 🤔😇😎
At first to me it actually seems a little routine. I mean he did ask her if she had anything illegal in her car or on her person and she said no until she agreed to a search and then admitted there were her ex-husband’s guns in the trunk and literally admitted that she stole them because he has been threatening her. She could have just been honest from the beginning about that when he asked her. The biggest thing that I think makes him look like a racist is that he jumped to conclusions about her intentions. I think it deserved to be investigated.
I mean, the arrest seems pretty fair. Are we supposed to believe that walking into a police station unannounced with illegal firearms that you've admitted you stole was a good idea? I get that the show is trying to push a racial narrative, but this seems like a VERY valid arrest regardless of age, sex, race, gender...etc.
Even if you've done nothing wrong never allow the police to search yourself your house or your car. If they ask the answer is no I do not consent. Do not say nothing say no I do not consent. Even if you have nothing to hide the police can literally trash your property and not have to pay for it because you gave consent. If you did do something and they search your vehicle or person and find it it can be thrown out in court as it was an illegal search.
Technically, she did break the law. And technically she had guns that were not registered to her. Now it depends on the state you reside in what gun laws apply, but I’m pretty sure you aren’t allow to possess other peoples guns without them with you( ex you and a friend are out shooting and he lets you use his rifle.) so technically again, she lied to an officer by saying she had nothing illegal, which possessing guns not registered to you is. Now, I can understand where she is coming from, but she is in the wrong in the eyes of the law. If she was afraid of her husband, she could relocate and/move in with family till it dies down or go buy a gun herself, learn how to use it, and get a concealed carry permit.
Legally, the senior officer may have been right, but his actions were straight up wrong. The correct response would have been to confiscate the weapons and escort (NOT arrest) her in for formal questioning. She was being open, honest and cooperative. There was neither the need nor the justification for an arrest.
@@Partyhatpossum prosecution comes later and has zero bearing on this. he has every right to arrest her here and its a felony charge as well he doesnt have discretion when it comes to felonies
you are absolutely wrong here. he had both the justification and the REQUIREMENT to arrest her. She admitted to a felony burglary as well as illegal possession of a firearm and stolen property. 2/3 of those are felonies and officers do no have discretion when it comes to felony charges. hes required to arrest her
@@Ll-ij2jh While you're right that this here doesn't necessarily prove he's racist He is, the show outright shows he's racist, he was pressuring her to get her to say things she didn't want to A cop shouldn't be saying "If you have nothing illegal, than we can search you"
well this scene doesn’t prove he is racist because cops can have bad interactions with different races without it being about racist but in the show it was about racism
Technically unless the paperwork was actually filed this is a wrongful arrest. Until the divorce papers are filed she has every right to walk on to the property. Unless an ro or tro has been filed.
He can ask. Nolan did nothing wrong there. She did steal guns. Reason or intent for theft doesn't matter. It's theft. She admitted to unlawful entry for the purpose of theft, burglary. The ex wound have reported then stolen anyhow, and this would have happened later with a court order if she hadn't said anything. The right way to handle this for her would have been for her to file a police report for the threats and weapons.
unfortunately it was they're duty to brig her in, at least for questioning. on the spot she admitted to burglary. and as he said, they don't know what she actually planned to do with those guns.
She did break the law. If she can convince them of her motives, they might go easy on her. But what happens when this cop lets her go and she takes the guns and does something criminal with them and it is revealed that he had her pulled over and knew she had the guns and had taken them and willingly let her go? Big trouble for the cop and his department.
This is why you can't say people who refuse to be searched, want a lawyer and refuse to speak are automatically bad or criminals. That cop was out for her from the beginning and was looking for something to get her on. She's obviously scared of her ex and even has a restraining order against him which they could look up. The cop saying how do we know she wasn't on her way to blast the ex's brains out, was making up something deliberately. Innocent til proven guilty and he just made up a crazy scenario.
She could say "No" when he asked to search the vehicle. Then if he does it anyway and finds the guns, they're inadmissible as evidence against her, since there was no probable cause and he shouldn't have conducted the search in the first place.
Racist or not she admitted to burglary. She shouldn’t be prosecuted but at least put under arrest. She has a trunk filled with guns that don’t belong to her and admitted to stealing them, shoulda just said “no I don’t consent to a search.”
the black officer was horribly incorrect in this video. immediately sympathized with the lady because she was black. having guns in the trunk isn't illegal. but she did admitted to entering her ex husbands home and stealing his guns.
If the ask if you mind if they do a search, DO NOT SAY YES OR NO. It’s a trap, if you say yes or no they’ll search. Explicitly say “I do not consent to a search”
I mean, if she technically stole his firearms, it doesn't matter if he threatened to kill her with them. Theft is still theft.. If someone threatens to kill you, its a crime, report it to the police and they'll sort it out, you dont just go and rob the person immediately after
The show is called The Rookie and it’s brilliant. The officer is training a new starter and is a racist. That storyline was brilliant as are many others in the show. Would recommend
She agreed to a search after admitting that she commited a laundry list or crimes ANS felt safe enough to go to his house despite feeling unsafe enough to file a restraining order.
Invoke your 4th and don't consent to any searches or seizures. Invoke your 6th and state you want YOUR attorney. (You do not have to tell them who your attorney is.) Invoke your 5th and don't consent to any conversations and remain silent.
You aren't legally forced to accept a search of the police, you can choose yes or no
Generally yes, and it is recommended to refuse for multiple reasons, including possible charges they could try to stick to anything...planted evidence, and they aren't liable for damage caused by the search....but if they have a warrant, probable cause to arrest (can search or "inventory" an inpinded vehicle) or if there is probable cause a life is in immediate danger
Not a lawyer not legal advice
sadly not in my country
Watch the series if you haven't yet. To put it simply the officer asking to search is named Nolan. He(the character not the actor) started off ok but ended up being more of a nuisance/asshole in the end. The series name is "The Rookie."
Yeah but then they call and dog team and make you sit for however long it takes for them to show up while they badger you. Seen it plenty of times
Lolkkl
Do not agree to a search. Never admit to anything.
Like Roger says, "you never tell on your own self".
The cop was on a power trip, it took months for them to get rid of him, it took for the black cop to get beaten on video for him to get fired
they would do it anyway
What you gonna do anyways, even if you dont consent, these "suprimos" aint gonna become saints
You do have to tell them unless you wanna go to prison because its a felony
“Can I search yo-“
*_No._*
Literally
Ryder
Bang bang
LawByMike 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥
Not sure if you can do that if your on a traffic stop but you can refuse search@dsafgsh
If an actor pisses you off, he's just a good actor.
He's a phenomenal actor
It’s taking all my strength not to punch the screen
Every movie clip has this same type of dumbass comment... 😒 🙄 😂 it's not necessarily a true statement either...
Or an asshole, but yeah, usually a good actor
i've heard enough of this shit i got it now everyone saying this just stfu
Anyone would be nervous if someone literally projecting “i will f up your day in 1 second” energy was the one wearing a badge
She was worried before he even said a word, probably as she was driving too. She got pulled over for something
@LoserHunter The white cop is a racist bastard, there was little reason for him to do any of this. What he did was illegal.
I am not black so it is not the same experience for me at ALL so I cannot compare, but even for me cops are terrifying. I was walking to work at night (I can't drive) and I had bright red hair and two cops stopped me on my way to work saying I look suspicious and 'fit the description" I had thick, curly RED HAIR with bangs and a flower decoration in my hair. I didn't look like ANYONE dude. I dressed super unique! They asked for my identification and proof, I luckily had my cvs uniform in my bag. It was SO crazy and such a lie. I was like shaking. Going to work after that sucked and I was late bc of them. :/
@@LoserHunter probably bc she was black and cop was being racist
@@phoenixastra4429You don't have to be black for your experience to be valid. I'm sorry that happened to you and hope things go better for you! Unfortunately, over time, police have gotten extremely ballsy when it comes to power tripping.
Always ask for a warrant, a lawyer (Have the number on speed dial) and remane silent till your lawyer arrives. Best thing my dad taught me.
Yet she is still in the wrong she did commit burglary and had stolen property
I don't have daddys money to have a lawyer on standby
@@tlr_automotive Funny how you assume it's my dad's money. Tells more about you than you'll think.
@@cvdirecto5008 i never said you did, i said i don't. What happens when you assume?
Don’t just remain silent. Say out loud that you plead the 5th and then say nothing else until you talk to a lawyer.
She could've just not consented to a search.
Did you watch the show he was a racist cop
@@Georgiaplains still would've helped her
@@Georgiaplains"did you watch the show 🤓" he didn't mention anything about the show, just that she literally could've just said literally nothing
@@Kira_Shu didn’t have to dildo lol the clip is literally form the show 😂 it’s called having source material 🤡
@@Kira_Shu it’s ok you’re just mad cuz the black person wasn’t in the wrong here
And this is why you
1. Don't consent to any searches without a warrant
2. DON'T TALK TO THE POLICE
It's also why you don't break into someone's house and steal their property
Wait, but my uncle is a police officer....
She did actually break the law, unless the guns were given to her, or they were in her possession already...she stole the guns from her ex-husband. It's fucked up, but you can't take something that isn't yours without consent of the owner. If her ex was threatening to kill her with knives, she couldn't just go into his house and take his knives from him to turn into the police.
Yes. And I’m pretty sure California has red flag laws. So she didn’t need to enter the exes house without authorization and seize the weapons
CAP🧢
@@flamegaming2not cap
Tho she had the key to the home does that help her case?
@SmileyFace123Lolz if she isn't registered to the address then she shouldn't have a key. She still committed theft, and that's still a crime. Regardless of how she felt,she needs to record and report the concerns, if she was a law abiding citizen, there was nothing stopping her buying her own gun...
She used her old key. She could have just left them there, as well as not consent to search.
You do realize it’s still breaking and entering if you use a old key? She doesn’t have permission to be there so it’s still a crime. She just admitted to 3 crimes, like yes he’s the antagonist but he correctly did what was required. She didn’t even want to mention her taking the guns to the police station at first so they would even rise a neutral cop.
@@socketyellow3Edit: touched up on my American law a bit more, and I was incorrect. Trespass and breaking + entering are very different where I live. Assumed it was similar over the water
Breaking and entering, violating a restraining order, stolen property, stolen firearms. Even if she didn't consent to the search she would have been arrested for the same crimes. She could have filed a GVRO, which the investigation or weather or not its needed is done AFTER they take the guns, and if it was proved to be true his guns would be gone forever and never given back. She is in the wrong, the cop also asked if she consented so that was up to her...
@@zacharybateman2606 well yes, except if she hadn't volunteered where she got the guns or given the officers permission to search the car, her crimes wouldn't have been discovered.
@danielbrandstetter8713 incorrect because if you are turning in guns they will do background checks to see if those guns actually belong to you or if you have a license to please able to own a gun. All guns have a serial number. They would run it. Figure out they are not hers, ask her why she is trying to turn in guns that aren't hers, and seeing as her intentions were to try and get her ex husband arrested for allegedly threatening her she would probably waste no time telling them.... and on top of all of this. Just because your crime isn't found out does NOT mean your in the right XD, she would still be in the wrong. She was overly nervous for no reason all the cop initially did was just your run of the mill stop. It gave him a suspicion, and In this case he was correct. That intuition may not always be correct and she has the right to deny the search. But the cop did not search without consent was respectful and she violated multiple laws and a couple of which were felonies, she was not in the right.
The fact that she committed to burglary which is illegal and then stealing firearms, which is very illegal is just crazy
Just to have the black officer try and get her off the hook cause she's black and blacks can't break the law
He was.saying that he was going to kill her so she stole them
@gamingwithjd2244 not how that works dude especially if she got a restraining order and then violated it by entering his living space lol 😂 mega illegal
@@gamingwithjd2244 & That's alone is enough for officers to check on him & the status of his firearms. If she had proof he is threatening to kill her, she shows it to the police. They get a warrant for her ex husband, & they take possession of the firearms. Especially if he has a history of abusing her. It would be illegal for him to own them anyways, depending on if their divorce resulted in any Domestic Abuse charges. He is threatening her life, she can stay low & inform the police. That's the best thing to do. NOT go to his residence & commit multiple felonies. (Each stolen firearm is another charge) not to mention breaking & entering or at the very least trespassing. (Petty crimes, but still prosecutable.)
Usually, commiting multiple felonies isn't the proper way to protect yourself.
Honestly even if they never pulled her over they would have arrested her at the station when she said where she got the guns. If someone threatens you with a gun, you aren't allowed to break into their house and preemptively steal the gun and then "turn it in" to the police.
I watched this show, it’s called Rookie and it’s on Disney plus. The officer that is saying that she was stealing, is racist. A couple episodes later, when the black officer (not trying to be racist) was getting jumped by people and his partner was just there watching him getting jumped, but the police checked his camera and caught him
Aight but she is actually in the wrong here. Legally speaking at least
How is saying "black officer" racist 💀
@@MinecraftBoy805 she stole firearms and broke and eneter when you do that you go to jail black or white.
Who but the one who was putting charges on them was not being racist at that moment, a episode before this one, he was being racist and gonna arrest a black family for no reason
its not on disney plus its on hulu
She isn’t legally forced to accept a search and I’m pretty sure he was racially profiling her
From the cops perspective they have no way of knowing whether the husband threatened you or not, but you did just confess to burglary, theft of property . . . at the least. Maybe the cops aren’t your friends, maybe don’t answer questions and don’t consent to a search.
Actually they could know. She had a restraining order against him
@@cindabourgeau4841 then why didn't she just contact the police and show them proof he contacted her so they could arrest him, why did she feel the need to break into his house and steal his property
@@johnhostetler2167 she told them she had a restraining order
Everyone mad at the cop don't seem to realize that not everyone tells the truth. She could've been going anywhere
In this instance everyone is right and wrong because from what people are saying this show makes this cop a racist but in the same hand she committed a felony broke her own restraining order she had instated for her ex and then had unknown intentions for those guns and while she was stating she would turn them in for all any one else knew she was going to shoot her ex.
Keyword could've
@Walter-white891 Okay, same rules apply the other way around. She could've been going to the police station, or she could've been otw to kill someone. Better not to take the chance
The police aren't allowed to do things because they theorize something might happen. They're only allowed to act on reasonable and readily apparent wrongdoing. That's how it's supposed to work. So, no, everyone is supposed to be mad at this cop character. He's out of line and probably racist.
people don’t realize how wrong is it is for a gunowner to have theirs stolen like that, when she keeps them (unlicensed and not registered to herself) and kills someone it’s her ex husband that’s going to prison for it as well as her
Stealing and transporting said guns is a big deal, is what it is
Frrr, she technically was on the wrong and did approve of the search. I hate when they make it some how "racist" it's not she was wrong for what he said possession of stolen property and transferring the guns
@@Anti-furry482 don't forget most likely breaking of a restraining order.
@Anti-furry482 She could've filed a GVRO (Gun Violence Restraining Order) weather or not he actually did anything wrong the cops would have immediately went and taken his guns until it was declared he was guilty or innocent and withing the mental ability to possess guns at that time. If it was found out that he was threatening her he never would have gotten them back and went to jail. She was in the wrong on many many levels.
@@Anti-furry482 Her skin color is the only reason why she got pulled over in the first place lol. Did you watch the show? This cop is quite literally racist
@@Anti-furry482she is in the wrong but the guy is racist
Girl I knew, had her ex, who did not live with her anymore, used his key to get into her apartment. I happened to be there at the time and when we attempted to have him arrested for breaking & entering and burglary, cops (Sacramento PD) stated they couldn't do anything since he had a key. If she didn't want him to come in, she should have changed the locks. She went down and filed for an RO the next day. This is not burglary.
It is definitely burglary. Cops don’t know the law buddy, you'd be foolish to think they do. That’s what lawyers are for. It is true that it’s not breaking and entering but no doubt it's still theft…
It is when they don’t live together anymore for one, and for two, leaves with guns that aren’t registered to her, without his knowledge or consent, and three, transports them in her own vehicle.
If there was an RO, he would have been made to turn them in as all registered firearms are subject to collection with an issued RO, especially in a domestic situation.
It’s no different than breaking into someone’s home because I had a key, stole their guns because they were threatening me. It is burglary and illegal entry
Her arrest is justified.
It is when they find live together anymore for one, and for two, leaves with guns that aren’t registered to her, without his knowledge or consent, and three, transports them in her own vehicle.
If there was an RO, he would have been made to turn them in as all registered firearms are subject to collection with an issued RO, especially in a domestic situation.
It’s no different than breaking into someone’s home because I had a key, stole their guns because they were threatening me. It is burglary and illegal entry
Her arrest is justified.
@@waveafterwave0723possibly true in some states, but other states won’t require you to forfeit your property just because someone was successful in getting a restraining order granted.
She took guns that aren't hers. That's robbery 😂🤡
Even if she's telling the truth, she should be arrested. She stole her ex's guns and was going to ILLEGALLY turn them in to be destroyed.
They def don't destroy the guns. They end up back on the streets a year later.
okay but he has been threatening to kill her with them? she had every right to take them away from him.
yeah she had every right to turn them in.. bc she was threatened, honestly the white police was just targeting ppl..
@@thankuu.smartyUnfortunately not the legal right, because the law has this unfortunate thing where it doesn't give a shit for obvious morality concerns, it's just a set of rigid, immobile statements that can screw someone who is scared for their life over if they take one step out of line. Technically a property theft crime even if it was a logical attempt to neutralize a threat.
@@Juliazx02 she had zero right to break into his house and steal his property, if someone threatens you that does not give you the right to break into their house and steal their guns, how stupid are you? She committed a felony by stealing those guns, if her ex threatens her then she should go to the police, she had a restraining order on him and if she had proof he threatened her then he would of been arrested, if she didn't think the police would do anything then why would she think they would of done anything after she stole his guns, she just would of been arrested at the station and he would of been given his guns back, I mean do you really think if someone threatens you that gives you a right to break into their house and steal their property?
This video is wrong in so many ways. She admitted to theft and having firearms which you probably doesn't have a license for I'm assuming this took place in California
It does
This is how cops work
@@Popeyedfreezenope they just ask generic questions and analyze individuals of their behavior and mental state, you just blanketing their occupation only shows your stereotype reliance
LA to be precise
@@PopeyedfreezeYeah cops generally take people in when they break the law that is how they work
She could've gotten away if she just kept her mouth shut and didn't consent to a search. Now, she's incriminated herself by stating that she has a restraining order yet willingly went and illegally entered his house, and took his firearms. Basically she committed 2 felonies + she violated her own restraining order... Even if what she said was true, she's going straight to prison.
He’s got a point for this arrest she did have guns and who’s to say she wasn’t going to kill her husband
Eat 💩💩💩
She also admitted to breaking into her ex's house and stealing the firearms, stealing firearms is a felony, she had no right to do that even if her ex did threaten her
I mean she legit said she stole them....
Yeah but she was turning them in for a really good reason so the fact he arrested her is hella racist
But she also says her husband was stalking her and threatening to hurt her.
@@tonypeppermint5329but she still admitted she stole them
@@tonypeppermint5329 does not matter. Innocent until proven guilty. If that happens, you don't break into their house and steal their guns.
@@TheKinkyHobbit he was proven guilty tho, she had a restraining order
Even if she was going to the police station to turn those guns in, she was still going to be arrested anyways.
Show : The rookie
Paragraph person !!!
So basically it’s officer west and officer bob (forgot his name so we will call him bob) Bob is very raciest and stuff so he arrests this women for having guns in the back bc they aren’t registered, she claims she was returning them but he was very mean to her and stuff and was aggressive
Wat season did he start making an appearance the racist cop
@@sammy5278 season 2-3 he was racist right off the bat
Is this "The Rookie" show?? If it is, I love it!!
Yea
It is
What are you doing, Brandon?! You were Superman! (White dude is Brandon Routh and played Clark Kent in Superman Returns)
Also ATOM (Ray Palmer)
This is a very nuanced scene and that's very rare in modern US TV shows, the white cop is doing his job and being objective she has broken the law multiple times, the young black cop possibly thinks its just racism, now it could be but we don't have any extra context in this video.
He is just being racist. Anyone that’s seen anything from this show knows he’s the racist cop character, but I don’t blame you if you don’t know that. Additionally, most people I’m seeing here are simply criticizing the woman for being an idiot and consenting to the search. No one is saying she was in the right, just that she’s dumb.
Extra context: later in that series that white cop turns off his camera and watches his partner there get beat up by multiple perps and intentionally delays calling for help. Just because from the info here it was the right call doesn’t mean it was for the right reasons.
@@KitK502 Wow that's disappointing and the reason I don't watch this garbage, the leftist progressives have taken full control of American entertainment and they just love racism porn, they can't seem to make any form of entertainment with out the white man bad narrative front and center...
@@KitK502 Whats the show called?
@@fidelaguilera6948 the rookie
she made the mistake of saying yes, but technically she is guilty of those charges
she literally committed burglary, stole firearms and is illegally transporting weapons
if that's not a justified arrest i don't know what is
but y'all keep crying a river over it
Yeah not like her ex husband cant buy a new gun, so what she is doing is illegal and pointless. Should go to the police and have them deal with it.
The show is called The Rookie
i love how even in the damn films showing fictional "racist" cops, 90% of the time the cop is in the right lmfao
Fr bro, she admitted to taking the man’s guns😂 the only racist aspect is the black cop siding with her cause she is also black🤦♂️
Eeat💩💩💩
@@abepresume8132 your reaction proves your lack of intellect good sir. Nice😉
Coping out of your mind if you think this cop was right lol
@@hugomendoza5665 he, as anyone else has the right to ask and get your permission to search your car, stealing property is illegal.
Yea she shouldn’t have consented to a search but also I totally get her getting arrested. She openly admitted to breaking into a home and stealing firearms. Regardless of if she was planing on turning them into the police or not, that’s still theft.
To be fair she looked hella worried when they walked up to her
because do you know how cops treat black people? especially black women? he'll she had every right to be fucking worried with how much black people face at the hands of cops
To be fair she’s a person of color & historically anyone who is a person of color is deemed suspicious by police officers
...since when was looking worried a crime...?
@@hugomendoza5665 it’s “suspicious activity” bozo
@@LoserHunterthen again, it didn’t show why she was pulled over. Let’s just say she got pulled over because she was thought as suspicious. Personally, I would’ve been pretty worried too if I was randomly pulled over. 🤷♀️
I like how the creator made sure not to show the cop was right so people comment
So what happened later i dont have a way of watching it for now and am curious
@blank26clover I didn't watch it but I remember the explanation basically the 🖤 cop thought the other one ra . cist and tried to help the woman until it was proven that the woman was in fact going to give the guns to a gang
The show did a couple of those situations until the 🖤 cop realized the other cop wasn't ra . cist he just really knew what he was doing
TH-cam isn't letting me send wth
@@blank26clovermaking sure you see the reply
Thank you
@@blank26clover❤
If she was in that situation, she should have mentioned it immediately. Shucks, if my life is in danger, I'll be happy to speak to the police officer.
She shouldn't of broken into her ex's house and stole his property in the first place lol stealing firearms is a felony, she should of went to the police straight away especially if she had proof he threatened her
Tv show name: the rookie
The cop isn’t racist , he made the safest option, they can discuss what happened in the police station
The cop IS racist (you'd know if you watched the show). However, he is not in the wrong here at all. I agree that it's best to figure this stuff out inside of a station or court room.
Except he is. Body language combined with words and actions
@@adamorick2872nah he just stylin n profilin’
If you watched the show yes he is. He literally beat innocent black people in front of their family, also if I remember correctly tried to frame someone for beating his partner up
Oh no. This cop is absolutely racist. This is one of his more mild actions of stereotyping and discrimination. You would know this if you watched the show instead of playing defense for a character you clearly do not know.
Ray went from superhero to deadbeat cop smh😞
Bruh she stole property and then was all suprosed when the officer actually foing his job and not rtying to be a soul brother actually does his job
they came up to her for no reason? thats pure rasism, plus she only stole the guns because her ex-husband was threatening to kill her dafuq she had every right to take them away from him💀
Yeah and stealing firearms is a felony, she definitely should be arrested
Probable Cause 😉
If they are that suspicious, you can still search without consent.
It's on the officer to risk an unnecessary search if he doesn'tfind anything.
She admitted to stealing from her ex partners house with a key she kept, she committed multiple crimes and admitted it to the police
Considering that this cop would later be confirmed as a racist. This was some good universe building here to show us his true nature.
This clip doesn't show him being racist at all, the lady should of been arrested, she admitted to breaking into her ex's house and stealing his property, also stealing firearms is a felony, if she was really concerned about her ex she should of simply reported it to the police, and since she apparently has a restraining order on him then he would of been arrested, also her story seems suspicious, she's in possession of stolen firearms which is a felony, she claims she was going to turn them into the police but she could of just as likely been going to sell them and using that ex story as cover, it's safer to arrest her and bring her back to the police station so they can do a proper investigation, now the cop could be racist but he is completely justified in this clip to arrest her and he should arrest her, idk why the other cop just wants to let her go because that would be irresponsible and unprofessional and dangerous, "oh this person is driving around with stolen firearms but she told me a good story so I let her go", "oh this person was a kilo of cocaine but they said it was their ex's cocaine and they swore to me that they were going to the police to turn it in to the police so I let them go" he sounds like an amazing cop lol
Some of the comments are saying “you could have just not consent to a search”
One of the main points was that she was scared of saying no. Because racist cop is going to racist cop and assume the worst of that no.
she doesnt know the cop. she has no way of knowing that hes racist lol. also she can be scared and still say no.
Also she has like a 5 year minimum sentence sitting in her trunk? Fuck id be nervous too if I broke into my ex's house, and stole their fuckin firearms haha
@@chaseholt3677 that threatened to kill her and has a restraining order
@@KreacherServes you can clearly pick up on his comments and tone that he is mistrustful of her
Also he did not state any reason why he pulled her over.
@@williammaser the pull over isnt shown in this clip nor does it matter here. Plus hes not required to tell them if they dont ask which she didnt.
Also his ton and comments dont really matter. it doesn't matter if hes mistrustful of her lol that can be for any number of reasons one of which being how incredibly nervous she is right away that's huge red flag and warrants mistrust. mistrust /= racism.
nothing he does here shows that hes racist the only reason we know that hes racist is because we know about previous actions.
He had a point. Her story was exactly all it was, a story. She could have been on her way to do something to him for all they know.
Why are yall defending her like she wasn't driving around with guns that she just stole.
Looking at this from both sides:
No, she didn't need to approve the search of her vehicle. No authorization->No search->no arrest.
Alternatively, she DID use her old key to get into her ex-husband's place and take his property. Threats or not, you can't steal other people's things. She was being pre-emptive about it, but could have called the police and they would / SHOULD have issued a warrant and removed the guns themselves if it was merited to do so.
i mean she did steal them... she coulda just called the police and said she was being threatened with a gun no?
Look at that "good cop" just standing by and helping the bad one
Why are they portraying this like the cop is wrong? It would be wrong to force a search/seizure, but asking is always within bounds. She consented. After finding guns and her admitting to stealing them, that's perfect grounds for an arrest.
Being arrested isn't the end of the world though. They'll obviously look into everything, and they could easily do more help for her as they look into her allegations of the guy.
But, yeah, TV show so drama and politcal narratives are played up.
Yeah she's in possession of stolen firearms which is a felony so obviously she's getting arrested, she claims she's going to turn them into the police but for all they know she's going off to sell them, it's definitely safer to arrest her and bring her back to the station so they can conduct a proper investigation, they could decide not to charge her or only charge her with a misdemeanor and send her on her way if she's being honest, and investigate her ex and possibly arrest him, but no, a cop is apparently racist for doing his job
I can't hate the actor he is good in Fact he was superman during my childhood, but i can hate the role they given him
Episode
The officer (played by Brandon Routh) is a racist in the show, but this arrest was solid. Yes he pushed for the search but she agreed to the search and the firearms in the trunk were stolen property that she freely admitted to stealing after breaking into her ex's house.
I am pretty sure that people aren't allowed firearms if they have a restraining order put on them
thats not how that works at all
@@KreacherServes I see spreading that good ol American pride
@@Georgiaplains what are you even on about here? lolo
it actually varies by state if you can or cannot possess firearms while under restraining order
@@KreacherServes same thing you’re on
Thank you for the interesting clip, I'm very curious to see how this plays out so if someone could please tell me the season/episode of this particular story "arc"?? I'd really appreciate it thanks !! 🤔😇😎
At first to me it actually seems a little routine. I mean he did ask her if she had anything illegal in her car or on her person and she said no until she agreed to a search and then admitted there were her ex-husband’s guns in the trunk and literally admitted that she stole them because he has been threatening her. She could have just been honest from the beginning about that when he asked her. The biggest thing that I think makes him look like a racist is that he jumped to conclusions about her intentions. I think it deserved to be investigated.
@@lilpotato7297still shes in fault
She freely admitted to stealing the guns , she broke the law and the reason doesn't justify the act.
I mean, the arrest seems pretty fair. Are we supposed to believe that walking into a police station unannounced with illegal firearms that you've admitted you stole was a good idea? I get that the show is trying to push a racial narrative, but this seems like a VERY valid arrest regardless of age, sex, race, gender...etc.
Even if you've done nothing wrong never allow the police to search yourself your house or your car. If they ask the answer is no I do not consent. Do not say nothing say no I do not consent. Even if you have nothing to hide the police can literally trash your property and not have to pay for it because you gave consent. If you did do something and they search your vehicle or person and find it it can be thrown out in court as it was an illegal search.
She admitted to felony theft. Arrest is the right decision.
Finally officer West got revenge on Stanton later on 😢
I mean the cop was just being racist but at the same time it is illegal to break into someone’s house and especially illegal to steal guns
How was he racist?
Just because you're black doesn't mean you're innocent
oh yeah, remember how he called her the N word then choke slammed her on the curb after she said 'hello officer'? yeah that was pretty racist
Technically, she did break the law. And technically she had guns that were not registered to her. Now it depends on the state you reside in what gun laws apply, but I’m pretty sure you aren’t allow to possess other peoples guns without them with you( ex you and a friend are out shooting and he lets you use his rifle.) so technically again, she lied to an officer by saying she had nothing illegal, which possessing guns not registered to you is. Now, I can understand where she is coming from, but she is in the wrong in the eyes of the law. If she was afraid of her husband, she could relocate and/move in with family till it dies down or go buy a gun herself, learn how to use it, and get a concealed carry permit.
Legally, the senior officer may have been right, but his actions were straight up wrong. The correct response would have been to confiscate the weapons and escort (NOT arrest) her in for formal questioning.
She was being open, honest and cooperative. There was neither the need nor the justification for an arrest.
Because she admitted to felony burglary.
@@SuperAd1980you’d have to find a DA willing to prosecute that charge given the circumstances
@@Partyhatpossum ahh, like kamala harris DA. 👍
@@Partyhatpossum prosecution comes later and has zero bearing on this. he has every right to arrest her here and its a felony charge as well he doesnt have discretion when it comes to felonies
you are absolutely wrong here. he had both the justification and the REQUIREMENT to arrest her. She admitted to a felony burglary as well as illegal possession of a firearm and stolen property. 2/3 of those are felonies and officers do no have discretion when it comes to felony charges. hes required to arrest her
A) don't agree to a search. B) you don't get to steal the property of your ex spouse, even if you have a restraining order against them.
She used HER KEY. That is nothing more than domestic dispute.😑
Those actors are amazing. I hated the white cop, and felt bad for both the black cop and the woman. That’s some good acting.
Didn’t know Ray Palmer was a racist cop
Or Superman.
Racism. Courtesy of Ray Palmer.
Law by Mike
1: say this, "I do not consent to a search"
2: then say, "I invoke the 5th"
3: DON'T SAY ANYTHING ELSE AFTER NUMBER 2!
Ohh a racist cop....
How was the cop racist she admitted to stealing them he had every right to arrest her
@@Ll-ij2jh While you're right that this here doesn't necessarily prove he's racist
He is, the show outright shows he's racist, he was pressuring her to get her to say things she didn't want to
A cop shouldn't be saying "If you have nothing illegal, than we can search you"
@@Ll-ij2jhin the show I’m pretty sure he was fired for racism.
well this scene doesn’t prove he is racist because cops can have bad interactions with different races without it being about racist
but in the show it was about racism
He was @@theduck5069
Technically unless the paperwork was actually filed this is a wrongful arrest. Until the divorce papers are filed she has every right to walk on to the property. Unless an ro or tro has been filed.
Those tears were incredible🎉😢
Superman turned into homelander real quick
People forget that Superman was raised in Kansas 😂
Number one rule when dealing with cops, shut up!!! Too many people talking themselves to jail.
Lol she broke her own restraining order, broke into her ex husband's house, and stole his property. How tf are yall calling this racist or unjust
He can ask. Nolan did nothing wrong there. She did steal guns. Reason or intent for theft doesn't matter. It's theft. She admitted to unlawful entry for the purpose of theft, burglary.
The ex wound have reported then stolen anyhow, and this would have happened later with a court order if she hadn't said anything.
The right way to handle this for her would have been for her to file a police report for the threats and weapons.
unfortunately it was they're duty to brig her in, at least for questioning. on the spot she admitted to burglary.
and as he said, they don't know what she actually planned to do with those guns.
If a character pisses you off, their actor is good at acting
She did break the law. If she can convince them of her motives, they might go easy on her. But what happens when this cop lets her go and she takes the guns and does something criminal with them and it is revealed that he had her pulled over and knew she had the guns and had taken them and willingly let her go? Big trouble for the cop and his department.
"How unrealistic do you want the scene to be?" -"Yes!"
This is why you can't say people who refuse to be searched, want a lawyer and refuse to speak are automatically bad or criminals. That cop was out for her from the beginning and was looking for something to get her on. She's obviously scared of her ex and even has a restraining order against him which they could look up. The cop saying how do we know she wasn't on her way to blast the ex's brains out, was making up something deliberately. Innocent til proven guilty and he just made up a crazy scenario.
who remembers Brandon played superman in the movie "superman returns"
Where can I find this movie and what is it called
She could say "No" when he asked to search the vehicle. Then if he does it anyway and finds the guns, they're inadmissible as evidence against her, since there was no probable cause and he shouldn't have conducted the search in the first place.
Racist or not she admitted to burglary. She shouldn’t be prosecuted but at least put under arrest. She has a trunk filled with guns that don’t belong to her and admitted to stealing them, shoulda just said “no I don’t consent to a search.”
Never agree to a search.
Always ask the cop if he has a warrant if he doesn't then always say no
He had no reason to search the car, but he is right to arrest her for burglary and theft. She admitted to it so...
the black officer was horribly incorrect in this video. immediately sympathized with the lady because she was black. having guns in the trunk isn't illegal. but she did admitted to entering her ex husbands home and stealing his guns.
If the ask if you mind if they do a search, DO NOT SAY YES OR NO. It’s a trap, if you say yes or no they’ll search. Explicitly say “I do not consent to a search”
Damn, superman turn in a homelander without powers
I mean she just admitted to entering a house without permission then stealing a fire arm. Stealing a firearm alone is a felony
I mean, if she technically stole his firearms, it doesn't matter if he threatened to kill her with them. Theft is still theft..
If someone threatens to kill you, its a crime, report it to the police and they'll sort it out, you dont just go and rob the person immediately after
And that is why you NEVER consent to a search
also probably shouldnt break the law lol
The show is called The Rookie and it’s brilliant. The officer is training a new starter and is a racist. That storyline was brilliant as are many others in the show. Would recommend
What's the name of the series/movie??
She agreed to a search after admitting that she commited a laundry list or crimes ANS felt safe enough to go to his house despite feeling unsafe enough to file a restraining order.
Broke into exhusbands house? Yeah, theft/burglary, book her Dan-o.
Invoke your 4th and don't consent to any searches or seizures.
Invoke your 6th and state you want YOUR attorney. (You do not have to tell them who your attorney is.)
Invoke your 5th and don't consent to any conversations and remain silent.
If the police doesn't have a warrant or a valid suspicion with which they can search you, you can decide to not let them search you or your car.