Apart from some mistakes this is by far the best format for a battle report. Maybe one or two more close ups on all the models to show them off but thats it. Great Stuff!
I like the format. I don't care to sit through two hour battle report videos. Subscribed. On the top of turn 4 you state that "both large undead hammers are put on fire". According to the Conflagration of Tzeentch Battle Trait, that can only be done once per turn.
Awesome, thank you! In terms of that hero phase, it is correct that only one unit can be get the burning keyword. Here I meant to say that both the crypt horrors and the morbheg knights had a bolt of tzzentch cast on them for straight damage.
there is several miss play : - you can move closer to 3inch of manifestation that doesn't move - mobid detonation of maelstrom is not a passif but a ability that you declare, so it doesn't explode by himself when the counter is reach
thanks for the heads up on the detonation. not sure which occasion you refer to with the 0-move manifestation. in this case the shackles were on the field but had their main use to try to slow down FEC in T1 and then later to put one round of damage on Ushoran.
The FEC player could have counter charged the shackles on turn 1 and pile-in in melee of your unit, denying you a battle tactic… You can’t use it this way to block your opponent, quite the opposite
@@robinapparailly3261 that's indeed a good idea. Need to be careful with how to place manifestations to not give the opponent more opportunities than you do for yourself.
Nice battle report, I like the format! Every ability in the game is optional, unless it states otherwise, for example fight ability. So Maelstrom doesn't automatically explode on 6 stacks, you can choose to use it.
Good game!! Couple of notes: 1) Apparently you can chose to activate abilities on warscroll, so the maelstrom doesn't have to explode on your face. 2) turn 4 fec. The unit in the center doesn't look like is 3" from the gravetide. By the look it could size the center staying 3" from the gravetide so the BT is still achievable. 3) turn 5 DoZ the charge of the second lord doesn't look like he could get in 0.5" of the unit because of the base size. Is just neat picking, great game!
@@Strade8 good question. The Maelstrom warscroll is lacking the "you can" as part of the ability. Might be somewhere in the core rules that you don't have to use it?
@@TheRealmWarsNetworkso this is correct the wording is very different compared to 3rd, you can declare when you blow it up. However, if it is killed or banished you would not be able to explode it like in 3rd is would simply poof.
Malevolent maelstroms' exploding ability is activated, or specifically doesn't have the passive keyword. Thus you can choose if it blows up at the end of turn.
Nice report! One question is there a particular reason the demon player didn’t summon spawn to prevent some charges? If you summon it in the enemy hero phase it can be very disturbing 😀
the turn to spawn spell is great when it goes off but quite conditional, ideally you want to cast it in the opponents turn to bind an enemy unit. the 12" range makes that tricky already and most importantly in this case you need to kill a model with D3 damage to turn it into a spawn. In this game only the crypt horrors and morbheg knights were in range of the spell and those got 4 wounds each. Hard to kill one of those with D3 damage, so usually "arcane suggestion" was cast instead.
Tzeentch list a bit one dimensional? Adding a unit of Tzaangor for some counter punch? Also never seen the spawn? But great report, really love the format!
Couple of notes. I'm not sure about the range on the Lord of Change turn 1. It's only 18" I'm not sure that was measured properly. You also state that DoT hold 2 objectives, but they were holding 3. Which does add up to 7 points. Hold 1, hold 2 or more, and hold more than your opponent. 1 point each. Round 2 Turn 2. Seems highly suspicious that 11 pinks do 8 damage on 4+ death rolls. That is way above average. Especially with a 6+ ward... Round 3 your scores are Dot 14 FeC 13. Not 17. FeC being the underdog, you should be stating whether or not the central objective is being made a home, flank or not. Blues kill a knight before dying? By attacks? They don't explode. So that's a bit confusing. The final score would have been DoT 36 FeC 39 FeC had 19 in 3, 29 in 4 and if you were paying attention to the central objective and made it home or flank then they score 10 for a total of 39. Overall this is a great format. But there's alot of mistakes and things aren't really explained. Like if the roll for the pinks death was amazing, you should tell the viewers the numbers, rather than claim they did 8 damage on 11 4+ rolls and got through the ward.
thanks for the detailed notes, glad you enjoyed the format! some details are indeed not mentioned or are not well reflected during editing, this style of battle report is a bit more upfront effort to record individual actions when reviewing the game footage and then turning each one into comment and/or graphic indication even (in the 3rd ed battle reports i was averaging about 150 actions per game) which all adds to the editing time. i cut down on some that i would have liked (like a CP usage indicator). Might try to add more back in again next time. Hope i can answer some of the questions on this game: T1 the LoC summoned the shackles, but as he was deployed a bit back the manifestation couldn´t actually affect anything due to the range. the score was hold 1, hold 2, hold more = 3 points + 4p for the battle tactic = 7 victory points. T2, the horrors spiked their explosions. was lucky for sure, but can happen. One of the main reason to take pinks over blues here, it makes especially heroes think before charging them. T3, here was an editing error in the scores. I realized after editing that i didn´t comment much on the underdog mechanic (or at all actually), in this game it was not that impactful as the FEC usually had the choice and turned the central objective into a home or flank one. As they were dominant on the objective control they didn´t need it much. Blues did indeed kill a knight by attacks. Doesn´t happen often but can. the score was off due to the editing error and i did not add the points for objectives of FEC T5 as the battle tactic was enough at that point.
ah crap, thanks for pointing that out. Hope it wasn't too disturbing, FEC did have several points they could have scored extra in T5 so the result would be the same.
Apart from some mistakes this is by far the best format for a battle report. Maybe one or two more close ups on all the models to show them off but thats it. Great Stuff!
thank you! will get more flyovers / close ups again for the next report.
@@TheRealmWarsNetworkhonestly this makes it 1000x more easy to process what’s going on lol, I also think close ups for armys would be cool! Good job!
I like the format. I don't care to sit through two hour battle report videos. Subscribed.
On the top of turn 4 you state that "both large undead hammers are put on fire". According to the Conflagration of Tzeentch Battle Trait, that can only be done once per turn.
Awesome, thank you! In terms of that hero phase, it is correct that only one unit can be get the burning keyword. Here I meant to say that both the crypt horrors and the morbheg knights had a bolt of tzzentch cast on them for straight damage.
Loved the format. Not at all tiring and could follow 100% what is going on. Subscribed, looking forward to more !
This format is sooo great. Good work. Subbed 👍
Awesome, thank you!
there is several miss play : - you can move closer to 3inch of manifestation that doesn't move - mobid detonation of maelstrom is not a passif but a ability that you declare, so it doesn't explode by himself when the counter is reach
thanks for the heads up on the detonation. not sure which occasion you refer to with the 0-move manifestation. in this case the shackles were on the field but had their main use to try to slow down FEC in T1 and then later to put one round of damage on Ushoran.
@@TheRealmWarsNetwork I was talking about the redeployment of the fec turn 1, but I guess he wanted to stay 3" from the manifestation
@@gilgamesh000 correct! Good spot.
The FEC player could have counter charged the shackles on turn 1 and pile-in in melee of your unit, denying you a battle tactic…
You can’t use it this way to block your opponent, quite the opposite
@@robinapparailly3261 that's indeed a good idea. Need to be careful with how to place manifestations to not give the opponent more opportunities than you do for yourself.
AMAZING BATTLE REPORT!!! THIS IS HOW YOU DO IT!!! :)
thank you! happy to hear that.
Excellent format, Love seeing DoT on the table and doing well!
Love the style and the comments, suscribed!
Thank you!
Here for both of these armies and awesome report. Keep up the good work. Subbed
Fantastic format! Loved it
First time watching a battle report from you guys, great stuff. Also love to see the random cat appearance 😅
Welcome aboard! Not sure how the cat sneaked in, i thought i managed to have her stay off the table...
@@TheRealmWarsNetwork She snuck in to get some water I think :D
This format is fantastic, I hope you make more of these for fourth edition
@@AdeptusEsquire planning to make more for sure
Great Battle report, just what I needed, no 3 hours battle reports
Thanks, subscribed
Great report, great video!
Only 21 minutes long, but was enjoyable and informative. Thank you for the great game!
Glad you enjoyed it! Hope the shorter form makes it easier to watch actually, as there are many long form battle reports out there as well.
Nice battle report, I like the format!
Every ability in the game is optional, unless it states otherwise, for example fight ability.
So Maelstrom doesn't automatically explode on 6 stacks, you can choose to use it.
Good game!!
Couple of notes:
1) Apparently you can chose to activate abilities on warscroll, so the maelstrom doesn't have to explode on your face.
2) turn 4 fec. The unit in the center doesn't look like is 3" from the gravetide. By the look it could size the center staying 3" from the gravetide so the BT is still achievable.
3) turn 5 DoZ the charge of the second lord doesn't look like he could get in 0.5" of the unit because of the base size.
Is just neat picking, great game!
@@Strade8 good question. The Maelstrom warscroll is lacking the "you can" as part of the ability. Might be somewhere in the core rules that you don't have to use it?
@@TheRealmWarsNetworklast BT on warpfire minis he explains the rule like that. I think you can activate (or not) each rule that doesn't say "Must".
@@TheRealmWarsNetworkso this is correct the wording is very different compared to 3rd, you can declare when you blow it up. However, if it is killed or banished you would not be able to explode it like in 3rd is would simply poof.
no fluff, no memes, just gameplay at a reasonable speed. Great content
Lovely short format.
Enjoy the style. Well voiced, not to long. Thank you
Glad you liked it!
love the format
thank you, will keep it in this style.
Great format and great report!
Love the format. Keep it up 👍
Really love these short form overhead battle reports, really dont like sitting through a 2 hour video of them
@@Jenkstudio97 thank you, that's exactly the idea too have it more compact.
Love the Bat Rep style!
Great game just hard when all those knights kept returning 💯👍👹
really shows you need to finish off a unit against FEC (they'll still come back once, but better than 3 times)
Great stuff!
Nicely done!
Thank you! Cheers!
woah that was a close one
It was a really good game down to t5!
Malevolent maelstroms' exploding ability is activated, or specifically doesn't have the passive keyword. Thus you can choose if it blows up at the end of turn.
thanks that makes the spell indeed much better than i thought it was.
Nice report! One question is there a particular reason the demon player didn’t summon spawn to prevent some charges? If you summon it in the enemy hero phase it can be very disturbing 😀
the turn to spawn spell is great when it goes off but quite conditional, ideally you want to cast it in the opponents turn to bind an enemy unit. the 12" range makes that tricky already and most importantly in this case you need to kill a model with D3 damage to turn it into a spawn. In this game only the crypt horrors and morbheg knights were in range of the spell and those got 4 wounds each. Hard to kill one of those with D3 damage, so usually "arcane suggestion" was cast instead.
Tzeentch list a bit one dimensional? Adding a unit of Tzaangor for some counter punch? Also never seen the spawn? But great report, really love the format!
@@renaukint8264 thank you.
The list was definitely full demon version. Benefits the LoC.
Next one will go into the warflock side of things.
nice work!
Thanks!
Great video, although I feel that the announcer's voice should be edited to be a bit louder, feels drowned out by the music at times
@@rocomet hmm, I see what you mean. I'll try to get it a bit more adjusted in the next video.
Really liked that!
love the styl of Battrap! keep it up new Sub her 🙂
Question: It seems that battle tactic "taker their land" was wrongly used. In both cases, chosen terrain was not wholly outside friendly territory.
@@alvarosalvador5392 it actually doesn't have to be wholly inside enemy territory. Partially is also allowed for this tactic.
But is must be wholly outside friendly territory
you do not have to boom maelstrom like that
yep, learned that this game.
Voice brings some Dungeon Keeper 2 vibes )))
i did not recognise that but you are right! now i need some more imps to slap DK2 style ;)
Couple of notes.
I'm not sure about the range on the Lord of Change turn 1. It's only 18" I'm not sure that was measured properly.
You also state that DoT hold 2 objectives, but they were holding 3. Which does add up to 7 points.
Hold 1, hold 2 or more, and hold more than your opponent. 1 point each.
Round 2 Turn 2. Seems highly suspicious that 11 pinks do 8 damage on 4+ death rolls. That is way above average. Especially with a 6+ ward...
Round 3 your scores are Dot 14 FeC 13. Not 17.
FeC being the underdog, you should be stating whether or not the central objective is being made a home, flank or not.
Blues kill a knight before dying? By attacks? They don't explode. So that's a bit confusing.
The final score would have been
DoT 36
FeC 39
FeC had 19 in 3, 29 in 4 and if you were paying attention to the central objective and made it home or flank then they score 10 for a total of 39.
Overall this is a great format. But there's alot of mistakes and things aren't really explained. Like if the roll for the pinks death was amazing, you should tell the viewers the numbers, rather than claim they did 8 damage on 11 4+ rolls and got through the ward.
thanks for the detailed notes, glad you enjoyed the format!
some details are indeed not mentioned or are not well reflected during editing, this style of battle report is a bit more upfront effort to record individual actions when reviewing the game footage and then turning each one into comment and/or graphic indication even (in the 3rd ed battle reports i was averaging about 150 actions per game) which all adds to the editing time. i cut down on some that i would have liked (like a CP usage indicator). Might try to add more back in again next time.
Hope i can answer some of the questions on this game:
T1 the LoC summoned the shackles, but as he was deployed a bit back the manifestation couldn´t actually affect anything due to the range.
the score was hold 1, hold 2, hold more = 3 points + 4p for the battle tactic = 7 victory points.
T2, the horrors spiked their explosions. was lucky for sure, but can happen. One of the main reason to take pinks over blues here, it makes especially heroes think before charging them.
T3, here was an editing error in the scores.
I realized after editing that i didn´t comment much on the underdog mechanic (or at all actually), in this game it was not that impactful as the FEC usually had the choice and turned the central objective into a home or flank one. As they were dominant on the objective control they didn´t need it much.
Blues did indeed kill a knight by attacks. Doesn´t happen often but can.
the score was off due to the editing error and i did not add the points for objectives of FEC T5 as the battle tactic was enough at that point.
tone down the sound between turn please , it s too loud.
@@banlungx001 done in the next video already
Fyi maelstrom doesn't have to explode. You dont have to activiate any abilties that eont include the word must
that's good to know. was under the impression that the "if it has 6 points" means it has to explode that turn.
GG! 🤙
Botton of t2. FEC score 6 points. The scoreboard goes from 7 to 17. Uuugh
ah crap, thanks for pointing that out. Hope it wasn't too disturbing, FEC did have several points they could have scored extra in T5 so the result would be the same.
Good style, but re read the link horror warscroll.
@@rmulshine thanks, which part about the pinks do you mean?
@@TheRealmWarsNetwork nvm, I was having trouble distinguishing units.
I miss sexy voice :(
welcome back! Happy to hear if people like the female or rather a male narrator more. Thought i give this one a try to see if people like it.
You lost me at “Word-Flame”. Really now. Are you even trying?
some fantasy terms are not clear in pronunciation to us non-native speakers and the AI at times does not convey these very well unfortunately.
Why so toxic?
@@user-be2nt8bi9j “Toxic”? Having standards and being unwilling to accept AI Slop is not Toxic.
You should try it sometime.