Investors were confused when a site claiming to do *REVIEWS* did actual reviews instead of *ADVERTISING* . It broke their brain so much that they got angry.
@@mmartinisgreatDude realized he would destroy his career if he gave that absolute garbage a good review so he decided to just be fully honest about what it does.
exactly, plus it's probably just faster using a Google lens shortcut or circle to search if you got a new android. if it was $500 with a $10 month subscription it would be alright but the price is so high
won't be long before Apple or Google start having us pay a subscription to use their A.I stuff. This is just the beginning, and by that time it'll be the norm for us.
Even more ironic when he was way more friendly on the product than I think most people would. He actively tried to make at least the idea sound good being like "when it works it's magical" but the fact how easily the phone works made it totally pointless.
@@Skylancer727 I listened to his Waveform podcast episode where they probably spent more time on the Humane pin and they did a pretty in-depth discussion of what it was and what it could do, and everybody on the podcast came to the conclusion that it's not worth it when it doesn't replace your phone seamlessly (which is the goal) and that it should have just been a phone accessory.
The Twitter users apparently didn't realise that if the product was good, the 18M subscriber channel would've been a massive advertisement for Humane Inc.
@@OceanSideO ignorant response “bozo”. It has nothing to do with the product, rather the principle of the situation. Funny how this has caused such an uproar for being such a small issue in your eyes. Smooth brain will do that to you however. It’s ok, a complex subject isn’t something I’d expect you to comprehend.
@@stephenferraro the video title is harsh but it doesn’t say what the product even is. Yea it sets the tone but if you don’t watch the video it’s hardly damage to Humane AI as you don’t know what the product is or who to attribute it to. If you do watch the video then you see examples of why it’s bad, which is fair
@@Aiden_Leither Lazy uncreatives that think they provide revolutionary products that will advance the tech industry, when they're just reinventing the wheel and shipping people a terrible wheel
@@Aiden_LeitherLazy uncreatives that think they provide revolutionary products that will advance the tech industry, when they're just reinventing the wheel
Problem is: because the pin is just a camera with mobile connectivity, it’s not even fast enough to assist the elderly. The response needs to be near instant.
If this was set up to warn of things like incoming traffic or other dangers to elderly people, by that response speed, it would be warning the user about the car during the trip to the hospital
@@badrequest5596 Exactly. Old people often have their reaction times and mobility greatly reduced but this will not make reacting to anything faster because you need to react to the pin. So if you rely on it to warn you about things it’s essentially just added lag. And of course, even the reactions of an average granny are way faster than anything that takes multiple seconds
Can't imagine how slow this thing can get if used in 3rd world country with very slow internet Even the Google assistant app can still response in just 1 second with my slow 3Mbps mobile connection in near rural areas
@@sihamhamda47 Yeah. If it doesn't even text-to-speech or speech-to-text locally so that it could just send prompts and and responses back and forth as a like a less than 1KB strings of text... If it could do that then the bandwith wouldn't really be an issue. but you don't even have to go outside of EU or US to find areas with 500ms+ of latency to do anything.
its like half the stuff on kickstarter. the products don't innovate on anything and are just worse than the alternatives that already exist in essentially every aspect. there's a huge disconnect between these companies and what people actually want.
Reviews don't kill companies. Bad products kill companies. Honestly looking back, this comment is braindead lmao. I'm surprised it blew up so much but reading your guys comments made me change my mind for the most part. I'll only leave this comment up for the shake of conversation in the replies
The functionality of a phone without being glued to a screen is a great concept. Various idealized versions are present in many sci-fi novels and films before the actual invention of smartphones solidified the idea of a handheld touchscreen device.
Marques is an incredibly fair and charitable reviewer who is genuinely looking for the good in products. His responsibility is to his viewers, not the companies.
He said that the playstation portal is terrible but look at how Sony said it sold beyond expectations. When has he made a video about admitting to being wrong? Actually not all TH-camrs have the manballs to do that lmao
Well, they've gotten comfortable with dangling free stuff in front of starry-eyed microcelebrities and thought Brownlee would be one of those guys. Dude is getting older and has seen a lot of consumer tech. It was foolish of them to send him a half-baked gimmick product.
@@bcj842You’re right about that for sure and there’s others just like him in that aspect and since now that they are financially well off (even though it shouldn’t but it does) have an affect as to giving their honest un sugar coated opinion.
I don't think some of the companies get that either, they rather want a positive review then a negative review and don't pay their reviewers unless it is a positive view, a shitty scheme from these snivelling companies tbh
The product is basically theranos. Practically does less than a smartphone yet claims to do much more. At least they came out with some hardware but this is just a lesser cellphone for no reason lol
If he left a positive review they'd just say he was paid off (and to be fair at least for this product they'd have a point, because the product is legitimately awful in every way) Main point being, you can't win with these people so there's no point trying, just ignore them.
@@Narangarath Yup. The systems themselves, communism and capitalism, aren't inherently bad, but the people using them for their own purposes very well may be. Essentially the systems aren't the issue, it is the corrupt people running them that are.
@@physetermacrocephalus2209 Can't remove the human element from any system, some systems remove more humans than others but still can't get past the failure of man.
I really love the new mentality some people have: I mean it's just like Hollywood: Not the quality of the movies is responsible for the low ticket sales, no it's the fault of movie-critics on TH-cam.
To be fair, strategic sponsorships and marketing can make people accept awful products. Hollywood could definitely save some movies from flopping if critics didn't do their job and just shilled out.
@@donventura2116yeah, I believe that. Psychology is a funny thing That being said some movies are just horrible and no amount of paid promotion can buy off an audience
@@benamisai-kham5892 He's still going? Holy shit. His channel is old enough that I remember him doing a review of the HTC EVO, which came out in 2010. 14 YEARS AGO That's awesome!
@@AK-sx4zp dude it's just a glorified wearable amazon echo. This tech idea is a decade old they just pretend it's magically different because its using LLMs in it's answers. This means sure it will probably always give you an answer to your question, but that doesn't mean that answer is fast, reliable, or curated in anyway. So you might get horrible nonsense.
An ai assistant that is always attached to me sounds like the intro to a scary movie. By the end of the movie I off myself out of frustration trying to reframe questions constantly
@@christophersumpit2627 well. During an autopsy you you need to make sure you are right. To not harm some other people, like in some criminal case. But yeah. Dead feel no pain
People on twitter acting as if companies have feelings again, good shit. Good on Marques for keeping his integrity and values shifted towards customers and not lame ass comporations
What i hate the most about this is that it's a mediocre product with a premium price and they know it's bad even in the presentation they were filing the silence between each command and the ai response with item description. If this product was well priced it wouldn't have received nearly as much criticism, but $700 for this??? You're not apple, you're a startup with a mid product.
the advertisement literally lies about the ways you can wake up the device. you could just as well press a button on your phone, literally. but oh wait you can wake up the phone with voice prompts, you can't do it with this despite the advertisement saying so.
For those who are out of the loop, Marques Brownlee also posted a relevant video near immediately before this video was uploaded titled "Do Bad Reviews Kill Companies?"
LOL that would be funny; but it's just ai doing it now xD AI can do simple computer stuff right now; but good luck getting automation to the levels of complicated high rise construction; lmao too unpredictable for it
@@Robert_D_MercerI mean it's true. I used to browse for some WFH jobs years ago and one of the small niche job I got interested in was just encircling, identitying and highlighting some photos and pictures so that companies use them for AI program. Didn't know AI suddenly blew up as much as it is now, though it's not worth spending your whole day just to recieved less 10 dollar for your daily work.
I once worked in a company where the Indian CEO had exactly this plan for the "AI" features. needless to say that the product sucked and the company went bankrupt.
@@Good_Horseyit never did. Doctors have always been giving their patients all kinds of weird "treatments". A big part of the opiode crisis in america is due to doctors over-prescribing drugs. Something similiar is now happening with doctors instantly recommending HRT to anyone that remotely questions their gender and before both of that doctors were prescribing cigarettes. If you have a profit oriented medical field then the oath means nothing
Yeah this is 100% true. I have a channel and on some of the videos people are like “this is such click bait” when the title is literally the topic of the video I’m discussing. I’m not swapping the topic.
If your title is "This is the worst thing ever" without saying WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK the thing is - then it is ALSO clickbait. You don't have to put tits in the thumbnail to become clickbait - you just have to be an ass about it. Literally right now i can look to the right and see * "There Are Thousands of Alien Empires in The Milky Way" - which is a WHOA and WTF title, but one shouldn't consider it clickbait - it's just emotional exaggeration. * "PayPal Is Dying. Good Riddance." - similar to the above. Topic is clearly stated, emotional exaggeration also clearly visible. * "Is Piracy Over?" - which immediately reeks of clickbait because it's a loaded question. It's a 50 minute "LMG Clips" thing, which supports the judgment * "They got away with this??" - which is the precise case we're talking about here. CLICKBAIT to the WHAZOO. * "Simpsons: Hit & Run Is Not As Good as You Remember (Sorry!)" - which says what it is and is thus absolutely not clickbait * "Fallout New Vegas - My Favorite Fallout Game of All Time" - as above * "The Etymology of UwU" - as above * "I Made a Graph of Wikipedia... This Is What I Found" - Clickbait AF, but at least broad topic is established. * "Shipwrecked on the Cannibal Coast" - image looks like a video game review channel. Basically if the video subject begs to be responded to with a "WHAT?" question ("This Is What I Found" -> WHAT did you find? / "They got away with this" -> With WHAT?) then it is 100% clickbait, as it forces you to click it to find out WHAT is actually going on. If you have to make a question-begging title, at least avoid the WHAT and instead go for "HOW?" or "HUH?" or even "WHY?"
The name "Rabbit" made me laugh because in the UK back in the 1980s investors lost $200 million in 80s money on a pre-mobile phone revolution, mobile phone service called Rabbit phones. The concept was that you could buy a small phone handset and as long as you were near a Rabbit point you could make a "mobile" call. The issue was that you had to be standing right next to a Rabbit transmitter and so you might as well just find a phone booth. Then within a couple of years of launching, mobile phone networks were a thing, especially in London where this service was aimed at. It's just funny that a service that will be obsolete through mobile phones have AI has the same name as the Rabbit phones who also created tech that was about to be obsolete and lost the modern equivalent of $750 million on it.
Remember when Marques Brownlee did a review on Dyson's air purifying headphones and said it was like, the worst product he ever tried lol. His review didn't cause the company to go Bankrupt and people still buy their other products.
Another reviewer, Mrwhosetheboss was even invited by the CEO himself but gave an honest review saying that the AI pin is bad. It's that bad. MKBHD did a follow up video on how bad reviews kill companies he said Zoom out, looking at others who reviewed the same product. they said the same thing about the product.
I was expecting him to say something along the lines of "think about this, did the company fail because of my review or did it fail because they just made a bad product" but he kind of beat around that bush
@@kay94 Apple genuinely makes good product almost 95% of the time. People give apple flack because they don't try anything new very often. But when they do, it usually has a big impact.
Yeah really this gained him some much needed credit and respect with the general population especially with like you were talking about everyone having a mindset of not rocking the boat and going along to get along.
Just like what was said in his video, I believe the main problem here is attempting to compete with smartphones at it's currently realized stage. Right now it should still be an accessory to smartphones and only go standalone once they make the user experience much, much faster
I remember seeing the Rabbit R1 ads and having NO IDEA what the product did. The ads for it literally told me nothing. My immediate thought is "This looks like a waste of money"
Well considering the fact they are pitching a device that would be like a 24/7 wearable that could listen to you everywhere. That is probably true. Also if do more research into modern AI tech you will understand how true that statement is.
>Ex Apple execs leading the project >Starts at $700 AND they have the audacity to require you to pay a subscription fee to use it Yep, sounds like an ex Apple exec alright.
When Apple fires you for being too greedy that's when you know you've gone too far. It's like that one EA exec who also got fired for being too money hungry
bro, you can do literally everything these pins do on your phone right now but faster and without having to scream in public or doing jujutsu hand signs to change a song.
3:58 dude woke up and said "I'm gonna write the dumbest take anyone has ever written on twitter!". The bar was already low but he took it straight to the Earth's mantle with that.
this reminds me of that recent case where a nigerian woman was arrested (and possibly facing 7 years in prison) for leaving a negative review about a tomato sauce brand. is this where we are heading?
I got a Samsung ad with Markus in it exactly when you transitioned into a video of his, making me not even realize I was listening to an ad for like 15 seconds
Marques is legit one of the best tech TH-camrs out there. Idk why people get so mad. Tech is so funny to me especially when people review bad products. I always appreciate honesty when it comes to tech. Because tech really is a big commitment for a lot of people. I do so much research and I love it when guys are honest. This story is wild to me.
I don't know why MKBHD is getting all the criticism for this when several other Tech Review TH-cam creators like Mr. Boss reviewed the same product and had the same criticism like MKBHD but nobody's talking about them.
The value of this and the 'unlimited cloud storage' has nothing to due with the consumer. The consumer is paying to be a profit battery for free analytics and model training FOR THEM, I'm totally confident in that. It's the ONLY reason these companies would dump that type of money into this.
I saw his review first and didn’t think anything was controversial about it! He was being a bit cheeky but honestly he gave the kindest most polite and positive review that is at least still honest that one could give for that product. That man is above the rest in how kindhearted polite interesting and creative he is. People really need to get over themselves lol
What everyone is missing is that this wasn't even an controversial review. Go read The Verge's review about the same product; they similarly gave it an incredibly harsh review. Everyone thinks this device sucks.
It's still too slow for old people. If it worked local only without subscriptions, you could *maybe* justify it, but as it stands a smartphone is *clearly* a better value.
It's not even just trash, it's worse. The selling point rides on the buzzword "AI" - basically relying on a sort of fad, without an actual practical use.... but in addition to that, I am almost certain that it is made with the intent to (surprise, surprise) collect data on its users! So cool to have another fashionable tracker that you don't fully own!
Don’t put out a garbage product. Don’t put out an unfinished procuct. Don’t put out falsely advertised products. 3 rules to live by as a company if you don’t want to get flamed for something you’re selling for hundreds of dollars as a luxury item.
This is the second time I've heard about some garbage product being weirdly protected by people in the last week. There was a canned tomato company in Nigeria that threw a shit-fit on Facebook because a pregnant lady said the tomatoes were too sweet. The sister of the owner went and got a pregnant lady arrested for inciting hatred against a product.
Marques is one of the more honest reviewers and hasn't become a shill like unbox therapy for example. Its nice to be able to have reliable news for tech when needed.
“Not all products deserve to succeed” - my thoughts exactly. Can’t understand why some people had a meltdown on twitter. Having said that as a reworked paired down phone it could work imo. I just think they have this compiled badly.
I think a lot of these devices are missing in the marketing dept. This would be great for visually impared people or people with cerebral palsy that can't physically use smart phones. But instead everyone's trying to sell this as the next Jarvis.
Tbf there probably are some products that already do that kinda thing without ai. This is a cheap gimic to scam people to buy an ai powered assiant then run away with the cash.
Or for it to be placed inside a toy tbh, i feel like itd do better as a child toy helping them learn about the world asking their teddy questions while carrying it around
Imagine walking around other people with a weird glowing pin with a camera. The moment you get in a building, I'd tell you to take that shit off and respect my privacy.
I remember that product getting announced, I also remember that people were already taking a dump on it back then because there was just no point to it. As for companies reacting badly to reviews, back in the olden days old (well, middle aged now) Top Gear reviewed the Tesla Roadster and subsequently got sued for it.
Wasn't that the time when they said the battery was empty really fast and that they couldn't do any more laps but it never went under 30% according to the onboard computer data? That's a good enough reason to sue them. The Reliant Robin constantly toppling over was also fake. TG was a scripted show...
I don't know what you define as old, I'm sixty six myself, and such a product would have extremely little if any use. After all I have my cell phone, and from what I saw, such a device, it holds absolutely zero value or use. So I seriously doubt those of us who are old would buy such a product, or if not in a good place mentally to be able to use one of those A.I. pins. All I see is a one trick pony, that looks like it's trying to be a three ring circus, plus some sideshows thrown in.
No matter how un controversial you are Twitter users will always find a way to cancel anyone/anything. Tech influencers like Twitter WAY more than regular people.
I genuinely can’t see a real world use for it for 99% of the population. Even when you ask what’s around you, by the time the response comes, everything would have changed.
But the difference is that Coca-Cola handled it gently and professionally even though their stock fell down right after that, unlike these companies. It's a bad sign that a company laid off some of the employees even before they launched their first product. I'm pretty sure higher-ups at Humane already know their product is crap so they need to adjust their financials. Even worse if a company can't do proper damage control and instead blames the problem on the dealer and tells them to do the damage control instead. Fisker as a company is already problematic to begin with.
Mutahar, I just have to say, you are like the ultimate reviewer. And I don't mean that in a bad way. Your reviewing capabilities are so great, your takes are so honest and logical, you can review other reviews and reviewers! Lol, but seriously though if you ever started seriously doing tech reviews on the regular like some of the channels you talk about, I would very much value your opinion and think you'd be among the best of any of us to do the job :)
This is just the same thing that happened to Juicero. If your product is something i can already do with my phone (or in the case of Juicero my own hands) and can do it faster and at a lower cost, then maybe you should go back to the drawing board.
I think the important thing is whether it's a good product and it wasn't a good product. It's not like he's shitting on a top notch piece of tech just for the lolz...
Okay so an open source equivalent of something like that running on your own setup would be kinda cool ngl. Or as you mentioned assisitve technology, specifically foucssed for patients' needs as researched because you can actually make functions targeted for a particular case instead of waffle (or so I say...).
The Star Trek communicator is actually useful. This is like the star trek communicator if the person on the other end of the line was a known compulsive liar who lacks object permanence and can sometimes only provide answers that are completely irrelevant to the question.
@@user-is7xs1mr9y true it also applies to like 90% of politcans its insane how much of the world is managed by people far too old to do anything useful.
I really fear the next generation of consumers who will tolerate the subscription based products. No one will owned their products that we "buy" anymore😢
That generation is already here. Look at games you "buy." , but its mot a subscription for as long as the DRM server is up and running. The car I drive, I get offers about upgrading to new features that the car is equiped with, but is locked behind subscription feels. (like using my phone as a key, is $40 a year or automatic hilight beam $100 a year I think it was)
LMAO. I find it AMAZING that one guy -- MKBHD -- can make entire companies quake in fear. But Marques isn't doing anything wrong. He just reviews stuff. Maybe make a better product, Fisker? If you don't want people to crap on your product, then don't make a bad product, lol. It's simple tbh.
As for the Rabbit; from what I've seen from tech channels and promotional material they function differently utilizing different form of models to perform actions traditional models would struggle on. Think auditory learner vs visual learner both people are learning just in different ways and some ways might be more effective for certain tasks.
@@623J_DaWolf for like 12 years she's basically an extension of the Apple marketing department, masquerading as a "reviewer", and there's an army of such people
Yeah but apples products aren’t “garbage.” They’re well made products just like Samsung, Sony, LG etc. Some people just have a weird cult like obsession with them and some people have a weird hate boner for them. For normal people who don’t get emotional about tech brands they just prefer apple or prefer something else instead.
If a single review is enough to bankrupt your company, maybe your company is delivering a shite product.
facts
Yupp
His title may be a little of a hyperbole. His platform is big enough to affect a company. However this product is kinda bad lol.
i mean it is a pretty BIG platform but yeah the review was at least honest unlike the controversial LTT video
@@feren9984 What was hyperbole about his title?
Investors were confused when a site claiming to do *REVIEWS* did actual reviews instead of *ADVERTISING* .
It broke their brain so much that they got angry.
Because he advertised for other companies.
@@mmartinisgreatand? Ads are paid for. Reviews aren't
@@mmartinisgreatDude realized he would destroy his career if he gave that absolute garbage a good review so he decided to just be fully honest about what it does.
That “do no harm” guy was literally malding so hard lol.
I've had this happen so much with quite a few companies I got review units from and I flat out refused to change anything in my reviews
Pay $700 to then pay $300 again annually. Wow what a deal.
exactly, plus it's probably just faster using a Google lens shortcut or circle to search if you got a new android.
if it was $500 with a $10 month subscription it would be alright but the price is so high
Forever at that
And you cant sync it with your phone.
$300 a year after paying an already outrageous $700. Yeah, that product was doomed to fail. The company going into bankruptcy is 120% their fault.
Oy!
Marques was not wrong. $700 and $24/month?!? Your cell phone can do all this and more.
For cheaper
won't be long before Apple or Google start having us pay a subscription to use their A.I stuff. This is just the beginning, and by that time it'll be the norm for us.
my phone is $150, and it serves me well. who the ffff needs this kinda product?
@@ryuno2097nah. we will get enough power to run AI locally. even today Snapdragon 8 gen 3 have capability to run AI locally.
@@ryuno2097 if i dont need ai shit doe why would i pay for it
Its a garbage product. Its honestly pathetic that a reviewer is getting flack for giving an honest review without being biased.
This is exposing Silicon Valley's scam culture
i usually dont watch reviews because i figure they're just sponsored ads.
Even more ironic when he was way more friendly on the product than I think most people would.
He actively tried to make at least the idea sound good being like "when it works it's magical" but the fact how easily the phone works made it totally pointless.
It's just twitter whining, nothing serious
@@Skylancer727 I listened to his Waveform podcast episode where they probably spent more time on the Humane pin and they did a pretty in-depth discussion of what it was and what it could do, and everybody on the podcast came to the conclusion that it's not worth it when it doesn't replace your phone seamlessly (which is the goal) and that it should have just been a phone accessory.
The Twitter users apparently didn't realise that if the product was good, the 18M subscriber channel would've been a massive advertisement for Humane Inc.
Exactly. People who use Twitter are NPCs.... animals even, if you will. They should never be taken seriously
Or the opposite and using your 18 million subscribers to bankrupt a company. You people and your smooth brain logic is astounding
@@stephenferraro Don't make a bad product then bozo😂😂 if you go bankrupt you were already on the way out.
@@OceanSideO ignorant response “bozo”. It has nothing to do with the product, rather the principle of the situation. Funny how this has caused such an uproar for being such a small issue in your eyes. Smooth brain will do that to you however. It’s ok, a complex subject isn’t something I’d expect you to comprehend.
@@stephenferraro the video title is harsh but it doesn’t say what the product even is. Yea it sets the tone but if you don’t watch the video it’s hardly damage to Humane AI as you don’t know what the product is or who to attribute it to. If you do watch the video then you see examples of why it’s bad, which is fair
"most controversial" and it's only controversial to AI bros, people who didn't even use the product, and Twitter
tf are AI bros
@@Aiden_Leither nft bro's but ai, I'd guess
@@Aiden_Leither one of the latest mostly imagined boogeymen of twitter, I guess.
@@Aiden_Leither Lazy uncreatives that think they provide revolutionary products that will advance the tech industry, when they're just reinventing the wheel and shipping people a terrible wheel
@@Aiden_LeitherLazy uncreatives that think they provide revolutionary products that will advance the tech industry, when they're just reinventing the wheel
$600 and $24 a month for a Dollar Store Alexa. No thanks.
700 actually also 800 for the other colors 💀
"other color" justifies 100 extra dollars? Wow!
Wait till they figure out how to add downloadable skins to the device.
Where did you see 600? Its 700
Are you one of those tricked by the 99 trick?
@@BaldAndCuriousapple moment
Problem is: because the pin is just a camera with mobile connectivity, it’s not even fast enough to assist the elderly. The response needs to be near instant.
If this was set up to warn of things like incoming traffic or other dangers to elderly people, by that response speed, it would be warning the user about the car during the trip to the hospital
@@badrequest5596 Exactly. Old people often have their reaction times and mobility greatly reduced but this will not make reacting to anything faster because you need to react to the pin. So if you rely on it to warn you about things it’s essentially just added lag.
And of course, even the reactions of an average granny are way faster than anything that takes multiple seconds
Can't imagine how slow this thing can get if used in 3rd world country with very slow internet
Even the Google assistant app can still response in just 1 second with my slow 3Mbps mobile connection in near rural areas
@@sihamhamda47 Yeah. If it doesn't even text-to-speech or speech-to-text locally so that it could just send prompts and and responses back and forth as a like a less than 1KB strings of text...
If it could do that then the bandwith wouldn't really be an issue. but you don't even have to go outside of EU or US to find areas with 500ms+ of latency to do anything.
And that was with fast and stable Wi-Fi too.
People were calling this pin a bad product BEFORE this review existed
I remember seeing the product trailer and I knew it would be garbo
Facts it’s a silly unneeded product for 99.99% of people. If you’re not to lazy to just take out your phone.
its like half the stuff on kickstarter. the products don't innovate on anything and are just worse than the alternatives that already exist in essentially every aspect. there's a huge disconnect between these companies and what people actually want.
Yeah, I and countless other people were roasting this product when it was revealed.
Come on now. It's expensive personal total surveillance. So much of your personal data up for grabs and you pay for the privilege.
Marcues wasnt in the wrong for telling someone their tech was shit
This is the second time this month Marques made a review that fucked over a scammy company financially lmao
I feel this is main reason why he's being attacked. Those companies are scared
@@badlydrawncars6460 Yet he is shilling for apple lol
He isn't. Proof? @@ElRabito
Marquise
MrWhoseTheBoss roasted this product to the company founder's face 😅
Did he delete the video? I cant find it
@@bluesunflowers it's still there - uploaded 6 days ago
@@Cold_Logic thanks, I hadn't scrolled that back
Wdym, it's the 3rd latest video@@bluesunflowers
@bluesunflowers you literally didn't need to scroll lol
Reviews don't kill companies. Bad products kill companies.
Honestly looking back, this comment is braindead lmao. I'm surprised it blew up so much but reading your guys comments made me change my mind for the most part. I'll only leave this comment up for the shake of conversation in the replies
Correct
Also lawsuits and day-in-life tiktoks
@@milseq day-in-life tiktoks?
@@LaEmporoar"here's a day in my life as a _____. " Then they proceed to basically promote random stuff
700 just to access a subscription service is baffling
I saw a 110% guaranteed undisclosed sponsor short open with “What if your phone didn’t have a screen?” and went “That’s literally a downgrade.”
But also, it’s literally just a more impractical smart watch
I used to have a phone without a screen. It did have a rotary dial though.
@@evilemuempire9550 smart watches still have screens because not having one is rubbish
The functionality of a phone without being glued to a screen is a great concept. Various idealized versions are present in many sci-fi novels and films before the actual invention of smartphones solidified the idea of a handheld touchscreen device.
@@donventura2116 no its not
0:33 I love how the list of uses for a smartphone these days almost never includes calling people.
Marques is an incredibly fair and charitable reviewer who is genuinely looking for the good in products. His responsibility is to his viewers, not the companies.
lol I love the sarcasim
@@Golgo1412 and Tesla
He said that the playstation portal is terrible but look at how Sony said it sold beyond expectations. When has he made a video about admitting to being wrong? Actually not all TH-camrs have the manballs to do that lmao
@@mentor_bajrami True.
@@Golgo1412 Not really, watch his review of the Vision Pro, he's pretty fair
These people forget that “product review” does not mean “product promotion/advertising”
Well, they've gotten comfortable with dangling free stuff in front of starry-eyed microcelebrities and thought Brownlee would be one of those guys. Dude is getting older and has seen a lot of consumer tech. It was foolish of them to send him a half-baked gimmick product.
@@bcj842You’re right about that for sure and there’s others just like him in that aspect and since now that they are financially well off (even though it shouldn’t but it does) have an affect as to giving their honest un sugar coated opinion.
I don't think some of the companies get that either, they rather want a positive review then a negative review and don't pay their reviewers unless it is a positive view, a shitty scheme from these snivelling companies tbh
The product is basically theranos. Practically does less than a smartphone yet claims to do much more. At least they came out with some hardware but this is just a lesser cellphone for no reason lol
If he left a positive review they'd just say he was paid off (and to be fair at least for this product they'd have a point, because the product is legitimately awful in every way)
Main point being, you can't win with these people so there's no point trying, just ignore them.
I like how Muta clowned on how Will Smith said it that one time and then proceeds to call him "markeez" the whole video
We are in a hilarious point in time where people think it should be illegal and punishable to think a product is bad
the is antislapp laws to protect reviewers from slapp lawsuits. aka lawsuits agsinst reviewers to suppress critics.
Hyper Capitalism. Communism is bad but Capitalism is not perfect either.
@@physetermacrocephalus2209 They're just different sides of the same coin.
@@Narangarath Yup. The systems themselves, communism and capitalism, aren't inherently bad, but the people using them for their own purposes very well may be. Essentially the systems aren't the issue, it is the corrupt people running them that are.
@@physetermacrocephalus2209 Can't remove the human element from any system, some systems remove more humans than others but still can't get past the failure of man.
I really love the new mentality some people have: I mean it's just like Hollywood: Not the quality of the movies is responsible for the low ticket sales, no it's the fault of movie-critics on TH-cam.
To be fair, strategic sponsorships and marketing can make people accept awful products. Hollywood could definitely save some movies from flopping if critics didn't do their job and just shilled out.
@@donventura2116yeah, I believe that. Psychology is a funny thing
That being said some movies are just horrible and no amount of paid promotion can buy off an audience
It's like everyone forgot that companies' products are not owed good reviews: if companies want to get good reviews, they should make good products
This AI fiasco reminds me of when smartphones came out and suddenly everyone and their mother started cramming "smart" functionality into EVERYTHING.
Yup... And basically 'smart' just means some corporation somewhere can control it instead of you. Like a 'smart meter' or 'smart printer'
he did the same thing with the fisker ocean 😭 he does not pull any punches and that's exactly why we need more honest reviewers like him
It's why I watch Flossy Carter, favorite tech reviewer for the last 6 years plus
@@benamisai-kham5892 He's still going? Holy shit. His channel is old enough that I remember him doing a review of the HTC EVO, which came out in 2010. 14 YEARS AGO
That's awesome!
*UnboxTherapy* has left the chat 🤣
@@pandorin2348Honest? UnboxTherapy?
@@doommaker4000 Left the honest group chat it seems.
Unbox Therapy would have probably called the item the most revolutionary device to ever come out in the last decade.
Dude this product like beats the purpose of any smart device like ever
@@AK-sx4zp dude it's just a glorified wearable amazon echo. This tech idea is a decade old they just pretend it's magically different because its using LLMs in it's answers. This means sure it will probably always give you an answer to your question, but that doesn't mean that answer is fast, reliable, or curated in anyway. So you might get horrible nonsense.
Always has been@xoxoxoxoxoxoxooxxoxooxxoxoxoxo
@@GeorgeSchroederrI ain’t accusing no one of nothing, but his analytics are Sus af
Looks botted
@@chonkyloreraccoon3686 way more channels are botting than you think. its kinda sad, actually.
who am i kidding, it's VERY sad.
An ai assistant that is always attached to me sounds like the intro to a scary movie. By the end of the movie I off myself out of frustration trying to reframe questions constantly
You have a smartphone dont you? You probably have something like an Alexa too. We're already there
@abeaconintheofficevirtual intelligence is still A.I.
y’all educate yourselves on what AI actually is and stop manifesting your ideas of it…smh🙄
"first, do no harm"
he's doing a product review, not an autopsy
I don't think the person undergoing an autopsy cares about pain anymore.
lol yeah, the Hippocrates oath only is applicable to sentient beings@@christophersumpit2627
@@christophersumpit2627 well. During an autopsy you you need to make sure you are right. To not harm some other people, like in some criminal case. But yeah. Dead feel no pain
Why is he acting like Marques is a doctor?
A doctor's duty is to the patient, a reviewer's duty is to the consumer.
People on twitter acting as if companies have feelings again, good shit.
Good on Marques for keeping his integrity and values shifted towards customers and not lame ass comporations
its twitter, what would you expect a place where humans are treated like shit and Corpos have feelings.
The audacity for companies to talk about feelings when most of the time they exist to hurt the customer’s feelings.
What i hate the most about this is that it's a mediocre product with a premium price and they know it's bad even in the presentation they were filing the silence between each command and the ai response with item description.
If this product was well priced it wouldn't have received nearly as much criticism, but $700 for this??? You're not apple, you're a startup with a mid product.
the advertisement literally lies about the ways you can wake up the device.
you could just as well press a button on your phone, literally. but oh wait you can wake up the phone with voice prompts, you can't do it with this despite the advertisement saying so.
For those who are out of the loop, Marques Brownlee also posted a relevant video near immediately before this video was uploaded titled "Do Bad Reviews Kill Companies?"
Saved you a click: bad products kill companies.
That 24$ subscription is used to pay call center agents from 3rd world countries who actually processes your requests and answers your question.
LOL that would be funny; but it's just ai doing it now xD
AI can do simple computer stuff right now; but good luck getting automation to the levels of complicated high rise construction; lmao too unpredictable for it
@@Robert_D_MercerI mean it's true. I used to browse for some WFH jobs years ago and one of the small niche job I got interested in was just encircling, identitying and highlighting some photos and pictures so that companies use them for AI program. Didn't know AI suddenly blew up as much as it is now, though it's not worth spending your whole day just to recieved less 10 dollar for your daily work.
I despise Indian customer service
I once worked in a company where the Indian CEO had exactly this plan for the "AI" features. needless to say that the product sucked and the company went bankrupt.
Ah yes, the other meaning for AI
Actually
Indians
Imagine being criticized for being honest.
Honest while black
"First do no harm." What? Do we have to start calling him Doctor Marques Brownlee?
underrated comment holy shit 🤣🤣🤣
Marques MIT honorary doctorate when?
Yeah that's part of the hippocratic oath and has fuck all to do with reviewing tech. That guy must be on some bad drugs.
Even in the medical field that doesn't mean shit anymore. 😂
@@Good_Horseyit never did. Doctors have always been giving their patients all kinds of weird "treatments". A big part of the opiode crisis in america is due to doctors over-prescribing drugs. Something similiar is now happening with doctors instantly recommending HRT to anyone that remotely questions their gender and before both of that doctors were prescribing cigarettes. If you have a profit oriented medical field then the oath means nothing
The usage of the word "clickbait" went from describing a kind of bait-and-switch, to describing any emotionally charged title/headline
What do you mean?
Daily s and tabloids are the creators of "click bait"
Guess how they achieved it?....
Yeah this is 100% true. I have a channel and on some of the videos people are like “this is such click bait” when the title is literally the topic of the video I’m discussing. I’m not swapping the topic.
if you don't feel exactly as strongly about the video topic as the creator, it's automatically clickbait these days
If your title is "This is the worst thing ever" without saying WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK the thing is - then it is ALSO clickbait. You don't have to put tits in the thumbnail to become clickbait - you just have to be an ass about it.
Literally right now i can look to the right and see
* "There Are Thousands of Alien Empires in The Milky Way" - which is a WHOA and WTF title, but one shouldn't consider it clickbait - it's just emotional exaggeration.
* "PayPal Is Dying. Good Riddance." - similar to the above. Topic is clearly stated, emotional exaggeration also clearly visible.
* "Is Piracy Over?" - which immediately reeks of clickbait because it's a loaded question. It's a 50 minute "LMG Clips" thing, which supports the judgment
* "They got away with this??" - which is the precise case we're talking about here. CLICKBAIT to the WHAZOO.
* "Simpsons: Hit & Run Is Not As Good as You Remember (Sorry!)" - which says what it is and is thus absolutely not clickbait
* "Fallout New Vegas - My Favorite Fallout Game of All Time" - as above
* "The Etymology of UwU" - as above
* "I Made a Graph of Wikipedia... This Is What I Found" - Clickbait AF, but at least broad topic is established.
* "Shipwrecked on the Cannibal Coast" - image looks like a video game review channel.
Basically if the video subject begs to be responded to with a "WHAT?" question ("This Is What I Found" -> WHAT did you find? / "They got away with this" -> With WHAT?) then it is 100% clickbait, as it forces you to click it to find out WHAT is actually going on. If you have to make a question-begging title, at least avoid the WHAT and instead go for "HOW?" or "HUH?" or even "WHY?"
AKA drama farming
The name "Rabbit" made me laugh because in the UK back in the 1980s investors lost $200 million in 80s money on a pre-mobile phone revolution, mobile phone service called Rabbit phones. The concept was that you could buy a small phone handset and as long as you were near a Rabbit point you could make a "mobile" call. The issue was that you had to be standing right next to a Rabbit transmitter and so you might as well just find a phone booth. Then within a couple of years of launching, mobile phone networks were a thing, especially in London where this service was aimed at.
It's just funny that a service that will be obsolete through mobile phones have AI has the same name as the Rabbit phones who also created tech that was about to be obsolete and lost the modern equivalent of $750 million on it.
Remember when Marques Brownlee did a review on Dyson's air purifying headphones and said it was like, the worst product he ever tried lol. His review didn't cause the company to go Bankrupt and people still buy their other products.
Heck, they still sell those headphones, so someone is likely still buying them.
Because they sell more than just headphones
thats cause dyson isnt a company that relies on that product, they were never a headphone related company to begin with.
Air purifying headphones? 🤣
I remember seeing an ad for it and expecting it to be joke...ohhhh how I laughed when I realized it wasn't 🤣
Another reviewer, Mrwhosetheboss was even invited by the CEO himself but gave an honest review saying that the AI pin is bad.
It's that bad.
MKBHD did a follow up video on how bad reviews kill companies he said
Zoom out, looking at others who reviewed the same product. they said the same thing about the product.
I was expecting him to say something along the lines of "think about this, did the company fail because of my review or did it fail because they just made a bad product" but he kind of beat around that bush
@@kay94 Because he leaves good reviews for good products?
@@collincreeden2862 Bad products kills companies & Bad reviews puts the nail on to the coffin.
@@kay94 I'm not a Apple glazer but Apple would not make a half-assed product like Humane does.
But hey, correct me if I'm wrong. 😄
@@kay94 Apple genuinely makes good product almost 95% of the time. People give apple flack because they don't try anything new very often. But when they do, it usually has a big impact.
I had never heard of Marques... headed "over there" to subscribe now... Thanks Muta, Love your work.
Best tech reviewer no cap
Maybe if more reviewers acted like MB then we would get less garbage
I think we would just see less reviews of crappy products rather than less crappy products on the market.
See video games
Yes the same guy who compared SoCs with camera sensors size. In his video die size is better for performance, check out his chip gate video.
Or ig companies didn't focus on MONEY and instead focused on making good products, we could get good products at reasonable prices.
The money from the company is too much for the reviewers to say anything bad about the products.
Mad respect to Marques for being honest. I'm glad he didn't take the game review approach and glaze a garbage product just because he was expected to.
Yeah really this gained him some much needed credit and respect with the general population especially with like you were talking about everyone having a mindset of not rocking the boat and going along to get along.
Just like what was said in his video, I believe the main problem here is attempting to compete with smartphones at it's currently realized stage. Right now it should still be an accessory to smartphones and only go standalone once they make the user experience much, much faster
I remember seeing the Rabbit R1 ads and having NO IDEA what the product did. The ads for it literally told me nothing. My immediate thought is "This looks like a waste of money"
At least the rabbit one looks nice. Still a dumb product idea but this Humane AI thing is the lamest version of this thing that could possibly exist
"Humane" somehow sounds like the most evil company ever
Well considering the fact they are pitching a device that would be like a 24/7 wearable that could listen to you everywhere. That is probably true. Also if do more research into modern AI tech you will understand how true that statement is.
@@404maxnotfound Every breath you take...
It's okay. They'll make sure their devices are humane. It'll be painless.
It sounds like an evil corporation from some video game haha
I wouldn't go that far. U can't just a company evil cos if a shit product.
haha its like blaming the weatherman for bad weather.
It's near $800 pin that also requires a subscription fee, I'm glad those bozos were being called out.
I saw it and thought, I bet it’s an Adruino with a battery, camera, speaker, and wifi dongle strapped to it
My 2005 Tamagotchi is more powerful than that $800 paperweight
>Ex Apple execs leading the project
>Starts at $700 AND they have the audacity to require you to pay a subscription fee to use it
Yep, sounds like an ex Apple exec alright.
lol. There's probably a reason they're "Ex" too. Probably had too many crackpot ideas in the boardroom.
When Apple fires you for being too greedy that's when you know you've gone too far. It's like that one EA exec who also got fired for being too money hungry
Bros really think they’re Steve Jobs 🤡
@@Jadty lol
bro, you can do literally everything these pins do on your phone right now but faster and without having to scream in public or doing jujutsu hand signs to change a song.
nothing spells rich and rob-able than wearing an obvious $700 ripoff on your chest.
A ripoff you can rip off...
The thing attached to clothing with magnet, it's super easy to grab and rob
Someone with fast hands and an "accidental" bump.
tbh the vision pro is a close competitor by this specific criteria
I bet the resale value will be absolutely crap though
3:58 dude woke up and said "I'm gonna write the dumbest take anyone has ever written on twitter!". The bar was already low but he took it straight to the Earth's mantle with that.
Sounds like he is invested in the product. Worst type of snake oil peddler.
Yeah that was a horrible read everything from the word choice to message behind was Insane
His bio advertises a gambling sponsorship. The user is messed up in the head
this reminds me of that recent case where a nigerian woman was arrested (and possibly facing 7 years in prison) for leaving a negative review about a tomato sauce brand. is this where we are heading?
That's a lol
I got a Samsung ad with Markus in it exactly when you transitioned into a video of his, making me not even realize I was listening to an ad for like 15 seconds
That's a good ad I wouldn't skip it
Muta, i appreciate you taking "blud is yapping" into your vocab for your vids😂😂
If your AI device ceases to function in a faraday cage, it isn't AI.
Well, it is, but not run locally. Which is very stupid. Just a glorified, wearable tracking device to add to the collection
@@sunla$700 signal transmitter with a camera.
I don't care if the birds name is Faraday, no birds belongs in cages!
@@NullScar are you trolling? lmao
@@NullScar I had a bird and she liked her cage so uhhh
i remember watching another interview for this product on a news station and the founders couldnt even answer "so what does it do?"
Marques is legit one of the best tech TH-camrs out there. Idk why people get so mad. Tech is so funny to me especially when people review bad products. I always appreciate honesty when it comes to tech. Because tech really is a big commitment for a lot of people. I do so much research and I love it when guys are honest. This story is wild to me.
I don't know why MKBHD is getting all the criticism for this when several other Tech Review TH-cam creators like Mr. Boss reviewed the same product and had the same criticism like MKBHD but nobody's talking about them.
Probably because of that Fisker review (which I also found hilarious in a “how do you release a product this bad” kinda way)
Not to mention that he even met the CEO and was almost laughing in his face..😂
The value of this and the 'unlimited cloud storage' has nothing to due with the consumer. The consumer is paying to be a profit battery for free analytics and model training FOR THEM, I'm totally confident in that. It's the ONLY reason these companies would dump that type of money into this.
Marq puts it eloquently ‘ bad reviews don’t kill companies, bad product does’
So great to see Muta's support of Marques, and, like MKBHD, explain why. Truth is fair.
I saw his review first and didn’t think anything was controversial about it!
He was being a bit cheeky but honestly he gave the kindest most polite and positive review that is at least still honest that one could give for that product.
That man is above the rest in how kindhearted polite interesting and creative he is.
People really need to get over themselves lol
the review is extremely kind to the product
What everyone is missing is that this wasn't even an controversial review. Go read The Verge's review about the same product; they similarly gave it an incredibly harsh review. Everyone thinks this device sucks.
It's still too slow for old people. If it worked local only without subscriptions, you could *maybe* justify it, but as it stands a smartphone is *clearly* a better value.
Unless it's shaped like a Starfleet insignia and I can call O'Brien to beam me up, I don't give a shit about it.
I'd prefer calling Scotty myself to beam abroad.
@@mikeycrackson xD "Shaka, when the walls fell."
"First do no harm" applies only to doctors and nurses treating their patients. Not for reviewers reviewing products.
If it's trash (and it is) your company deserves to fail.
It's not even just trash, it's worse. The selling point rides on the buzzword "AI" - basically relying on a sort of fad, without an actual practical use.... but in addition to that, I am almost certain that it is made with the intent to (surprise, surprise) collect data on its users! So cool to have another fashionable tracker that you don't fully own!
@@sunla Another "CEO" with a solution looking for a problem
Don’t put out a garbage product.
Don’t put out an unfinished procuct.
Don’t put out falsely advertised products.
3 rules to live by as a company if you don’t want to get flamed for something you’re selling for hundreds of dollars as a luxury item.
They don't really care they just wanted the investment funds to funnel. Edit: Everything else is extra $$
Apple didn’t lie when they made the apple 2 this is a good example for a start up that made it and these days your phone or tablet is made by them
Are we assuming that the criticism Is from real people? It's an AI Company with millions of dollars, I smell bots :D
I'm still waiting for the iButtPlug to drop.
it could probably even track your health and give diet recommendations
Please eat more fiber.
From what I've seen, Marques will promote the crap outta that.
No pun intended.
Full salute to the brave people who test run that thing, "day 1 patch" ain't ever gonna mean the same.
I don't know why it would drop when it's plugged in your butt?
This is the second time I've heard about some garbage product being weirdly protected by people in the last week. There was a canned tomato company in Nigeria that threw a shit-fit on Facebook because a pregnant lady said the tomatoes were too sweet. The sister of the owner went and got a pregnant lady arrested for inciting hatred against a product.
I heard about that too. It's farcical.
I saw a post comparing the sweet tomatoes with mkbhd’s fisker review, trying to understand how he still was a free man after destroying a company 😂
Marques is one of the more honest reviewers and hasn't become a shill like unbox therapy for example. Its nice to be able to have reliable news for tech when needed.
As someone who works in T-mobile, this device makes me wanna gag. We’re basically forced to sell something uninteresting
When I want to know if a tech product is trash, I can trust marques. and I wish more reviewers were like him.
“Not all products deserve to succeed” - my thoughts exactly. Can’t understand why some people had a meltdown on twitter.
Having said that as a reworked paired down phone it could work imo. I just think they have this compiled badly.
I think a lot of these devices are missing in the marketing dept. This would be great for visually impared people or people with cerebral palsy that can't physically use smart phones. But instead everyone's trying to sell this as the next Jarvis.
Tbf there probably are some products that already do that kinda thing without ai. This is a cheap gimic to scam people to buy an ai powered assiant then run away with the cash.
Or for it to be placed inside a toy tbh, i feel like itd do better as a child toy helping them learn about the world asking their teddy questions while carrying it around
@@sinny5404 a childs toy with a camera sounds like a disaster waiting to happen
My immediate thought was Neuralink. That will be the most controversial tech review.
Imagine walking around other people with a weird glowing pin with a camera. The moment you get in a building, I'd tell you to take that shit off and respect my privacy.
30 mins since MKBHD uploaded a video explaining situation and oh man it was well put.
I remember that product getting announced, I also remember that people were already taking a dump on it back then because there was just no point to it.
As for companies reacting badly to reviews, back in the olden days old (well, middle aged now) Top Gear reviewed the Tesla Roadster and subsequently got sued for it.
Even though Jeremy Clarkson gave the most honest review……. In the world.
Wasn't that the time when they said the battery was empty really fast and that they couldn't do any more laps but it never went under 30% according to the onboard computer data? That's a good enough reason to sue them. The Reliant Robin constantly toppling over was also fake. TG was a scripted show...
He was right, all promotional material use thick material clothing. I did not notice that
I don't know what you define as old, I'm sixty six myself, and such a product would have extremely little if any use. After all I have my cell phone, and from what I saw, such a device, it holds absolutely zero value or use. So I seriously doubt those of us who are old would buy such a product, or if not in a good place mentally to be able to use one of those A.I. pins. All I see is a one trick pony, that looks like it's trying to be a three ring circus, plus some sideshows thrown in.
No matter how un controversial you are Twitter users will always find a way to cancel anyone/anything.
Tech influencers like Twitter WAY more than regular people.
You could be like the msot eprfect person and twitter would still shit themself
Imagine we were so accustomed to paid promotions and product endorsements that when a negative review comes out people are shocked. Oh wait..
I genuinely can’t see a real world use for it for 99% of the population. Even when you ask what’s around you, by the time the response comes, everything would have changed.
Not gonna lie, I thought this was gonna be referring to ReviewTechUSA having a meltdown lol
What has the chickenman done now?
That's just a normal episode for him
It's nice hearing about a big company shaking in its boots talking to an independent tech reviewer rather than the other way around for once
Marquees is now like Ronaldo telling everyone to drink water instead of coke
But the difference is that Coca-Cola handled it gently and professionally even though their stock fell down right after that, unlike these companies.
It's a bad sign that a company laid off some of the employees even before they launched their first product. I'm pretty sure higher-ups at Humane already know their product is crap so they need to adjust their financials.
Even worse if a company can't do proper damage control and instead blames the problem on the dealer and tells them to do the damage control instead. Fisker as a company is already problematic to begin with.
Mutahar, I just have to say, you are like the ultimate reviewer. And I don't mean that in a bad way. Your reviewing capabilities are so great, your takes are so honest and logical, you can review other reviews and reviewers! Lol, but seriously though if you ever started seriously doing tech reviews on the regular like some of the channels you talk about, I would very much value your opinion and think you'd be among the best of any of us to do the job :)
This is just the same thing that happened to Juicero. If your product is something i can already do with my phone (or in the case of Juicero my own hands) and can do it faster and at a lower cost, then maybe you should go back to the drawing board.
I think the important thing is whether it's a good product and it wasn't a good product. It's not like he's shitting on a top notch piece of tech just for the lolz...
Man’s thought Marques was Miles Morales
"That's a Cybertruck"
*Looks at phone*
"Yep"
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Bro i love you keep doin yo thang. You're truly and inspiration to all kids and adults who love tech fr. and other hobbies like cars lol!!
Imagine going after the weatherman for warning you about an incoming hurricane.
Okay so an open source equivalent of something like that running on your own setup would be kinda cool ngl. Or as you mentioned assisitve technology, specifically foucssed for patients' needs as researched because you can actually make functions targeted for a particular case instead of waffle (or so I say...).
What in the Star Trek communicator, Batman?! 😂
The Star Trek communicator is actually useful. This is like the star trek communicator if the person on the other end of the line was a known compulsive liar who lacks object permanence and can sometimes only provide answers that are completely irrelevant to the question.
@@404maxnotfound So the other person on the other side of the line is Joe Biden.
@@user-is7xs1mr9y true it also applies to like 90% of politcans its insane how much of the world is managed by people far too old to do anything useful.
I really fear the next generation of consumers who will tolerate the subscription based products. No one will owned their products that we "buy" anymore😢
That generation is already here. Look at games you "buy." , but its mot a subscription for as long as the DRM server is up and running. The car I drive, I get offers about upgrading to new features that the car is equiped with, but is locked behind subscription feels. (like using my phone as a key, is $40 a year or automatic hilight beam $100 a year I think it was)
"Wear a microphone around exposed on your chest at all times" like having one in our pockets isnt good enough
LMAO. I find it AMAZING that one guy -- MKBHD -- can make entire companies quake in fear.
But Marques isn't doing anything wrong. He just reviews stuff.
Maybe make a better product, Fisker? If you don't want people to crap on your product, then don't make a bad product, lol. It's simple tbh.
lol samsuang just updated the phones to have a new AI asisstant two days ago
Twitter gets mad if you promote a product too hard yet also gets mad if you trash a product? Truely, you cannot win
The video's title sounds like a personal opinion, so it's not really misleading as that is largely what reviewers do, give a personal opinion.
As for the Rabbit; from what I've seen from tech channels and promotional material they function differently utilizing different form of models to perform actions traditional models would struggle on. Think auditory learner vs visual learner both people are learning just in different ways and some ways might be more effective for certain tasks.
Most tech reviewers kiss APPLE’s ass.
inb4 the dude with the "iphone collection" replies to you.
Bad product is a bad product doesn’t matter Apple or Android.
iJustine the biggest example
@@623J_DaWolf for like 12 years she's basically an extension of the Apple marketing department, masquerading as a "reviewer", and there's an army of such people
Yeah but apples products aren’t “garbage.” They’re well made products just like Samsung, Sony, LG etc. Some people just have a weird cult like obsession with them and some people have a weird hate boner for them. For normal people who don’t get emotional about tech brands they just prefer apple or prefer something else instead.