Krishna is the God and he had all the powers and knowledgeof GOD. Its easy for him to overcome all hurdles of life.. and stick with his dharma .After all, he is the creator of all life and dharma. How could it be comparable to a mortal like karna??
@@amlankaushik2168However he never used his powers on whim. Also, Karna always complained about him being treated unfairly but even Krishna had to receive curse from Gandhari and had his family decimated. Even today many people say Krishna were partial towards pandavas but none observe the reasons behind that. Krishna is always on the side of dharma, he sees no one above dharma not even himself
@@amlankaushik2168Shri Krishna lived his life in the mortal world by performing karma . He took a mortal body and lived his life like an ordinary human . He wanted to show that you can live your life by performing karma .
@@amlankaushik2168 Karna wasn't the only one who suffered. But surely the one who got on doing adharma faster than the others. Ashwatthama was mocked at by his friends at a young age for his poverty, had to be bound to Duryodhana, and side with him in the war even though he wanted to avert it and had to be witnessing his father being killed in front of him. Did he side with adharma then? Only when Duryodhana was killed, Ashwatthama was moved and did his wrongs. Yudhishthira lost his father at a young age and became the guardian for his brothers and mother from then. His brother was poisoned twice. He was always defied by Duryodhana and Karna in the ashrama. He became the heir-apparent at his own qualities but was sent to be burnt to death with his family. He received a barren half of the kingdom to rule while he deserved a proper half. He never ever mistreated any Kaurava despite their misgivings. He time and again refused to attend the gambling match, to Vidura and to Shakuni but no one listened. He stayed quite for all of those injustices done on him. Yes he was wrong to have staked his wife, and his brothers. But he repented more than all the others. Even after his wife was disrespected as such and he had robbed off of all possesions, he sent multiple peace treaties, only if it could stop the war. And though he was the one who always wanted peace, he became a cause for this entire war and was guilt ridden forever. Was life not harsh to him? And yet at last, despite his uncle being a root cause to the war and all the harms inflicted on him and his family, he cared for his uncle enough to change the heart of Dhritarashtra even. That's the difference. Everyone was wrong. But some tried their best not to be.
I can feel Karna. He knew that he was in a wrong path but he was silent bcz of his loyalty. We can blame him, but if we were in his position, I can't say what would we do
He could’ve been loyal by telling truth to his friend and maybe they both would’ve been better off. But instead he chose blind loyalty. They’re both just as guilty. If u love someone, b loyal by telling d truth and doing d right thing. He didn’t choose loyalty he chose doom. He’s guilty
Krishna is wrong. Krishna is Vishnu himself so he can literally change his lifepath irrespective of his challenges unlike Karna who is a regular human who cant control his fate
@@diplocolus1439Krishna used his godly powers multiple times to change the outcome of events in life and of those around him prior to the final Mahabharat war. So no, this saying cannot be applied to a human who has no power to change events outside his control.
@@EdwinTyler karna could have stayed out of the war like Rukmi. Or switched sides like yuyutsu. Or at least not insulted Draupadi or attacked abhimamyu from behind.
@@diplocolus1439easily kar skta tha yeh bolna bohot asan. When life has been unfair to you, it is difficult and that is okay. Karna ne jo kia woh sahi kiya. Uske liye no one stood up. Not the pandavas, nor krishna. Duryodhan stood up for him and gave him status and opportunity. Toh usnei duryodhan ka sath diya, baat khatam. Krisha ka kya jaata hai gyan pelne ko. Jo jita hai usi ko samajhta hai.
Also reminds me of Harry Potter: Dumbledore says “it’s not our abilities that make us who we are but our choices. Given a choice choose what’s right not what easy.”
And karna chose the right path he chose rationslism over conservatives if you feel any blame on kauravas krishna himself admits to balarama suyodhana was killed because he was against varna dharma he wanted to give open choices to all which would cause chaos
True but for some people it's hard for them to choose better decisions because of the influence around them. He wasn't entirely a bad person. What we should learn from his story is that we should help people when they're suffering so that they don't cause harm in the future.
Harder said than done. When pain and injustice are all you know your whole life, not having a vengeful, hate-filled, and pessimistic attitude towards it all is nearly impossible.
One thing you said wrong. Parsuram kick him out for hiding his real identity. Parsuram told him that he would teach anyone irrespective of who he is. He kick Karn out for lying
Parashuram kicked him out for concealing his identity but parashuram wouldn't even have taught him a word if karna had been honest. Karna had no other option but to lie.
@@hello08763 Karna went to drona and was rejected for not being a brahmana,so then karna put on a fake sacred thread, went to parashurama and pretended to be a Brahmana since he knew parashurama would not accept anyone other than Brahmana as his disciple. If education was imparted to anyone regardless of their Varna karna would never have lied to parashurama, parashurama was so mad at karna that he wasn't ready to believe Karna when he said he was suta Putra and wasn't a kshatriya,he still believed him to be a kshatriya disguising himself as suta Putra.
Krishna is the God and he had all the powers and knowledgeof GOD. Its easy for him to overcome all hurdles of life.. and stick with his dharma .After all, he is the creator of all life and dharma. How could it be comparable to a mortal like karna??
@@amlankaushik2168😂 Krishna is a form of God in human form. He was no mortal. He had his birth and death. So his actions were applied to normal people.
To everyone in this comment section, if someone else has their facts wrong or something, pls don't be harsh with them. You've never even met them before. Knowledge should be shared not braged about, so share things wholeheartedly.
If Karna was a real friend of Duryodhana then it was his duty to stop him from Adharma like What he did with Draupadi and many things.. Lord Krishna always tried hard to turn up Karna against Adharma but nothing works. Jai Shree Krishna❤
Bro what are the adharma and many things committed by duryodhana, kindly tell me if you know or just leave it if you dont know ,but dont say like every thing he did was adharma ,please tell me what are the things he did were adhama
1)droupadi vastraharan 2)pandavo ko jalana 3)bhim ko sap se dasvana aur jahar pilana 4)pandavo ko sui ki nok ke barabar bhi jameen nahi dena chahta tha ahankar me aur bohot adharm kiye hai , usme ye sab karne ki buddhi bhi nahi thi , karn aur mama shakuni ne use bhadkaya har samay @@monkeygamer2565
@@monkeygamer2565 Even a kid knows that.... What Duryodhana and his brothers did with Panchali, even duryodhan and shakuni tried to kill Pandavas, So many times. If you don't know...then pls watch Mahabharat.
@@ongaming007 You are right bro...In order to protect dharma, If necessary can do Adharma. It is called as ApadDharma (Dharma Appropriate at the time of calamity)
It is true all the Karna got humiliation abd rejection even though having talent and ability. But Karna made mistake when he was silent about Vastra haran of Droupadi and he took side of Duryadhan even though he knew he is with Adharma. Jai Shri Krishna
Bro pls go and read the actual mahabharat karna is a pure villian he was a student of guru drona and he went to parshuram to learn the knowledge of brahmastra so he can defeat arjun and disguised himself as a brahim so prashiram will taught him his curse was legitimet also it was karna who was motivating dushasan to strip draupadi even it is shown in the br chopras mahabharat
Karna is my favourite character in Mahabharata. Sure he did mistakes, like not stopping duryodhan from humiliating a woman (draupadi). Maybe it was because he also resented her, but in my opinion humialiting woman just because she had humiliated her is unjust. But he was truly a good person, because he had donated so much, to the point that he took an oath to give anything a person asks from him to the person in need. That is why he is called "Danveer Karna". He is also inspirational. Despite facing so many hardships, he succeeded in learning the art of the bow. Hare krishna, Om namo suryadev
Good person..😂😂 He was the one who ( rather the only one) who called her Draupadi a prostitute , if she has 5 husbands.., she can have more .., he was the one who gave the idea of disrobing …….. please go read the original Mahabharatha. 😂😂 hero …🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
Also his benevolence and Danveer nature was a part of his ego. He enjoyed the fact that he was the most charitable and everyone thought of him As that.
@@swethab6572 I'm not calling him a hero, he had his bad sides and good sides, the fact is that he DID donate anything that was asked from him. He is not the most perfect character, and certainly not someone who is to your sole role model, but nonetheless he was a good person, and he is inspirational in many aspects, but not all.
@@TheseksiXae my sincere request.. read the original … it’s voluminous, it’s tedious .. but BORI and Gita press have done an efficient job. Before forming opinions… please try to read. Or a simpler , concise version is Ami Ganatra’s Mahabharatha unravelled … P.S : not here to promote certain books , but want all to read originals before forming opinions.
@@TheseksiXae also he donated .. becoz of his ego and satisfying that. Haven’t you met such fame / name cravers who do stuff so that they are praised and in limelight. Are they doing that Dharmic thing for the right reason?? He did for Laurels ..! No animosity against Karna… he isn’t my enemy
Karna is the son of the Surya dev (The Sun God) and Kunti (while she was engaged to be married to King Pandu). Kunti in fear of the society acceptance by King Pandu, put baby Karna in a basket boat in the river. He was found and raised by a Kshatriya Charioteer who was married to a Brahmin woman, Radha. Hence, he was known as Radheya (son of Radha, shuit).
Kunti was not engaged to anyone. She married pandu by swayamvara which means the bride can choose a king whom she likes out of many kings that were invited.@@amartyapandit
@@amartyapandityes she was not engaged that time, but she did very wrong thing when she threw her infant son in river... People blame karna because those people living good life, even they don't get 5% of sufferings similar to karna. If only 5% of sufferings or 5% of injustice would come in their lives, they gonna mad and they won't care for dharma or anything.... that's reality of people.
Karna was the only person who had dream of happening of Mahabharata war. He narrated to Krishna that he saw ashwatathama wearing white turban and gearing up for war. He told he saw yudhishthir climbing up the mountains of skull and eating ghee and sugar. Karna when spoke his agony, Krishna didn't even replied. Karna told Krishna that ashwatathama, duryodhana etc are merely casts of time. Listening this Krishna laughed and invited him to the side of pandavas to which he denied. He told Krishna that he will meet him in heaven post his death. He hugged Krishna and went to his path. Source Mahabharata Gita press Gorakhpur
Few people easily blame karna because those people living good life, they don't get even 5% of sufferings similar to karna. If only 5% of Karna's sufferings or 5% of injustice would come in their lives, they gonna mad and they won't care for dharma or anything.... that's reality of people. And those people don't have 5% of determination and bravery as of Karna, but they can put finger towards Karna easily. When Mahabharat war started, Kunti went to meet Karna and then she revealed that he is elder son of pandavas and she requested him to not kill his brothers, and she even invited him to join her family of pandavas now. Then Karna replied that he can't leave Duryodhan in middle for his own benefits. Duryodhan is always bigger and valuable for Karna than his own brothers. And Karna also asked to Kunti that why she is inviting him now to join family when she threw him in river at first place when he was infant baby? Karna also promised to Kunti that he will not kill rest of 4 brothers, but arjun is his enemy, so he would not let arjun go. And Karna kept his promise in battle, he had forgiven lives of rest of 4 brothers when he defeated all of them and he could kill them easily, but he forgiven them.
Fun Fact : Karna got his education from guru dronacharya, Kripacharyaa and Parshuram. Guru drona didn't taught celestial weapons(i.e: bharmastra)to Karna and that's the only reason he went fro parshuram. These bloody half baked youtubers only saw the TV serials and making videos on scriptures 😂😂😂 Great time we live in where lies are appreciated....
What about Drona's promise to make Arjuna the world's best danurdhar and for this, he asks Eklavyas his thumb for guru dakshina? If it's true, doesn't it mean that Guru drona was biased towards that Arjuna? He taught his son Ashwatthama and Arjuna about Brahmastra but why did he declined Karna's request??
I am trying to convince this to my mind .. But question arises. Why a guru will give education to a lowe cast poor child in the same class of princes ?? Isn't it weired that 105 Rajkumar and 1 Sutputr were studying in same class ? Besides karan is their anyone did guru drona teach toh any other normal and lower class student ? If not then what's the reason he is only teaching to karna and Rajkumar in that same batch ?
@@vikashpal4875Sir kindly read the Chapter 1 of Mahabharata. Eklavya introduced himself as the eldest son of Commander in Chief of Magadh King Jarasandh, Hiranyadhanu. Magadh had previously attacked many a times on Hastinapur. So you want Dronacharya the Rajguru of Hastinapur to create a weapon for Jarasandh to be used against Hastinapur itself? Do you support that we should teach our hostile neighbours the art of war? Again even today the teachers of a school are not expected to tutor students outside school. So, how was Dronacharya wrong? Not only Karna his brothers were also along with many students were taught by Dronacharya. You can easily find it in the first chapter itself.
The Shrimad Bhagvad Gita is a blessing to mankind! It teaches us the way of life & gives the solutions to our problems in every situation! Blessed to be born in this culture! #RadheRadhe #HareKrishna #BhagvadGita #India #Hindu #SanatanDharma #SanatanDharam #JaiHind
Brilliant lesson ❤❤❤ For those who are sympathetic towards Karna for being loyal, I think Dharma comes before any loyalty or other feelings. If someone has done a favor towards you, you should definitely be grateful. However, if that person asks you to support him in robbing a bank, or cheating someone, or killing someone in return of that favor, then being loyal is not only foolish but also unethical ✅️✅️✅️
the reason why krishna explained this to karna with no hesitation was because whatever struggles he faced from his childhood till his destined death was known by him,he was one step ahead of what was going to happen as he knew what was going to happen,but karna was just an ordinary human,he wasnt the ultimate being like krishna,so it was human of him to ask krishna this question for his justice and insults throughout his life
Lord Krishna may be ultimate being but he acted like human. So I think it's reasonable to compare his difficulties with Karna. He used his divine prowess only to teach dharm and to save parikshith. 😊
Once you step on this road there is no way to go back... unless you are God or reverse the time there is no way to know that this will happen in the future or to know the outcome...karna was neither God or a time reverser.... Once you owe your dignity to someone else there is no way to pay back with any material
Brother go read Maharishi Ved Vyasa's Mahabharata The Stories About Karna Are So Different Than What They Showed In Tv Serials And In So called Historic Educational Videos.
Actually based on the Mahabharat scripture, Karna did received his education from Guru Dhronacharya with the other princes, since his father was a Kshatriya working as a Royal Charioteer of the King Dhrutrastra. Karna wanted to learn more advanced divine weaponry, for which Dhronacharya refused, since he saw his dark side of competition from Arjun. However, Karna did receive one-on-one advanced training from Lord Parashuram (6th Avatar of Vishnu) even if he was not a pure Kshatriya and his mother was a Brahmin (shuit). Parashuram later found out that Karna had lied about his origin and that he was actually a pure Kshatriya, so he cursed him that when Karna will really need his advanced weaponry knowledge the most, it will not work for him.
Karna did the right thing. Dying for a friend whom he was loyal to is the right thing to do rather than switch sides to save his brothers who didn't know he was elder to the Pandavas. His life teaches us gratitude, loyalty, sacrifice, and the will to overcome pain and humiliation 👍
as a matter of fact that was the only wrong thing he did.... Duryodhana was cruel and represented adharma.... instead of fighting and dying for him, he could have stopped or educated Duryodhana.... supporting Duryodhana was like supporting all his wrong doings....and there can be no excuse for that
@@bumblebee264 May sound true but in Mahabaratha, Dharma is quite complicated and can be overwhelming if put under research from the general perspective. Sometimes, it's beyond human comprehension and only Krishna understood the intricacies. Dhuryodhana crowned Karna as a king while Pandavas mocked him owing to his birth as "Soodhaputra". Karna decided he owed his life to Dhuryodhana from that moment. And changing Dhuryodhana was impossible even for Krishna, the lord's own incarnation. How can Karna hope to change him?
@@krishnamohan5523 I think it was more about convenience on Karna's part to keep supporting Duryodhana and not even trying or objecting to any of his actions....Mahabharat comes after Ramayan, and Ramayan has Bibhishan's example of choosing right over his own brother....also Duryodhan saw Karna's skills and manipulated him into supporting him by showering many goodies...just like politicians do nowadays in their constituencies...Karna, just like Bhishma and Dronacharya were blinded by the debt of Duryodhan to such an extent that they could not act against any wrong
@@bumblebee264 True, but it's more of standing by his word rather than convenience. If it was just convenience, Karna would have changed sides once Kunti broke the mystery about his birth. And by that time, he had lost his Kavacha kundala to Indra, and he was well aware that Indra was Arjun's God-dad before even giving it away. He knew he was not invincible anymore since he lost them. And even before that, he knew Kouravas would never win this war as Krishna Paramatma was on the Pandava side. So, he definitely chose the most painful way to die. Dhuryodhana was an arrogant prick who would enemize anyone who gave him good advice. If Karna persuaded him, he would have done this to Karna too. Maybe he could have even pointed out that Karna was able to keep up his dignity only because of him. Karna knew this at the bottom of his heart. So, whatever it may take, he decided to support him and pay him back with death if that is what is needed out of him. That's the reason he is still spoken of
@@krishnamohan5523 whatever you said makes sense....now coming back to your original point about whatever Karna did was right....thats exactly what Bhagwan Krishna said....for him it seemed the right thing to do because of all those reasons....but for others who now say that he was right, it is as if they did not learn the lesson at all....Karna, Bhishma, Drona and many more did not realize what was greater good and opted a glorious death to be remembered as a hero while siding with wrong, over a rather less glamorous but right approach....after knowing everything, if you say Karna was right, then you have not completely come out of the illusion which Karna had....that means in one way the learning is not registered in you....and god forbid, if you come across a situation like Karna....the question would be, what will you choose?
Read from books this perticular video is also distorted some facts as it is taken from a TV series Valmiki Ramayan Bhagavad Gita are two important ones if you want to know Shiv ji and mother parvati then go for shiv Puran
First of all karna is a human so the external environment can affect him whereas Krishna is a self realised soul. Nothing makes him angry, sad, happy, etc.., so there is no difficulty for Krishna. Krishna knows past, present and future and the ability to change it also
Sri Krishna suffers himself to teach the people that they have to follow dharm at any situation, dont consider karna as a hero Every man has his own problems Take the stories of all other avatars,even they had problems
That's what Krishna is telling him with adharma you're destined to lose Arjuna was not only a great Archer or valor warrior but a great great devotee of Krishna He accepts anything that Krishna orders him Everyone in the Mahabharata knew Krishna was God himself Karna too, but instead of asking the supreme being for his help he went to duryodhana Surrender to god and you will be taken care of
@@countluciferderebelis226 their is no reigning In hell lol That man couldn't even tolerate the humility of this world forget about having a thick skin to rule in hell After all you get what you deserve He wanted to be a king by any means necessary then he died by any means necessary Why crow about it in front of lord then Just take your punishment silently Don't talk about justice and injustice if you want to get your desired goal by any means And not by surrendering to God God gave sudama two world of riches without even asking and was willing to give his own vaikunth lok too That's the power of surrendering in front of lord
In no way I am saying what Karna did was right but I can bet on it that if any of us were in his place.. we'd have probably made the same choices that he made. After knowing what's right and wrong, saying Karna was wrong is easy but being in his place and experiencing all the bad things that he went through is something we'll never understand. He is called "Daan veer" for a reason. He has done a lot of good for the people as well but many people chose to ignore it. To me he'll always be my favourite and the most misunderstood person from the entire Mahabharata.
Krishna forgot to mention that he is literally a God. The avatar of Hari Vishnu. The whole universe belongs to him. How can there be a comparison between a God and a mortal?
This is the main point of this story bro Even god has to suffer from problems because dosnt matter he was a god At end of day he was living a human life Krishna said that I can end the war in few seconds but he was doing karma(duty) Lesson in this story is that no matter how worse situation gets don't leave hand of righteousness
@@hemantdhasmana3030 If he was living a human being how was he able to lift a mountain with his little finger? If he was living like a human being how did he manage to create and use Sudarshan Chakra? Can a mortal lift a mountain on his finger, can a mortal create Sudarshan Chakra? He had divine powers because he is himself the divine. How can he claim to be mortal?
@@aavinashchaliha7810that's the moral of the story Surrender in front of God not in front of immoral people like duryodhan What people don't talk about or show is,how great of a Yogi and tapasvi and bhakt Arjuna was He was the biggest devotee of Krishna even in vanvaas they never felt any hardship aand sang bhajans of krishna which they ofcourse used to do even when they were king He followed Krishna everywhere and had immense faith in him Except the only time when they didn't want help due to embarassment was in dhyuth krida where they lost badly and suffered Krishna was a Yogi of the highest order and steady in his heart with Krishna's devotion
Few people easily blame karna because those people living good life, they don't get even 5% of sufferings similar to karna. If only 5% of Karna's sufferings or 5% of injustice would come in their lives, they gonna mad and they won't care for dharma or anything.... that's reality of people. And those people don't have 5% of determination and bravery as of Karna, but they can put finger towards Karna easily. When Mahabharat war started, Kunti went to meet Karna and then she revealed that he is elder son of pandavas and she requested him to not kill his brothers, and she even invited him to join her family of pandavas now. Then Karna replied that he can't leave Duryodhan in middle for his own benefits. Duryodhan is always bigger and valuable for Karna than his own brothers. And Karna also asked to Kunti that why she is inviting him now to join family when she threw him in river at first place when he was infant baby? Karna also promised to Kunti that he will not kill rest of 4 brothers, but arjun is his enemy, so he would not let arjun go. And Karna kept his promise in battle, he had forgiven lives of rest of 4 brothers when he defeated all of them and he could kill them easily, but he forgiven them.
Educate yourself . Karna was a student of Dronacharya just like other students. Dronacharya also taught the Vrushnis( Yadavs) students from Sri Krushnas clan and other students too. And Parshuram cursed Karna cause he lied that he was a Brahmin. Karna was not disgraced in Draupadis swayamvar. He couldnot put prattancha on the bow that was kept there. Read Mahabharat from Gita Press.
Educate yourself. There are multiple version of the Mahabharata and the Gita Press's word is not the gospel. There happens versions of the Mahabharata where Karna gets rejected by Draupati for being a son of a charioteer.
@@zhozhoe Karna was the king of Anga desh. So it did not matter who his father was. The bet placed in the Swayamvar was " who ever could pierce the moving target successfully by looking at its refection in the water below could marry Draupadi". Arjun was dressed as a Bramhin and still could participate in the swayamvar proves anyone could participate. Just like it did not matter who Satyavati ( matsya gandha) was. She was the daughter of a fisherman( a shudra) and king Shantanu married her. She was Bhisma pitamahas step mother. Krushna Dwaipayan Vyas was the son of Satyavati. He wrote Mahabharat. Did it matter ??. No...! Vidur was a son of a shudra woman did it matter ?? No..! You can find multiple examples like this in Mahabharat.
There is a difference between a Sarathi and a charioteer. You have to trust your sarathi with your life. He is the person safeguarding you when you are at war. Shree Krushna was Arjuns sarathi in Mahabharat war. Shalya ( Madri's brother and Nakul and Sahadev's mama) king of Madra Desh was sarathi of Karna in Mahabharat war. It was not looked down upon to be a Sarathi. Instead it was a job given to a very close and trusted person. Sanjai was Dhrutarastra's sarathi who was given divya drusti by Ved Vyas ji so that he could see the whole war and narrate it to pradnyachakshu (blind)Dhrutarastra.
@@Diptimayee_Das I accept that Karnan and His friends are wrong . But Why Pandavas are right ?! They accept to do gambling with their Wife as if She was an Object ?! Why ?! Isn't that Wrong ?! Why God didn't punish them since They disrespected their Wife by agreeing that Condition ?! Why They were silent When Injustice is happening to their wife ?! It is their dharma ?! Krishnan did anything to them for this ?!
Read the Mahabharat. Drona refused to train Karna at first because he was Sutaputra, of not equal status to be training with the princes i.e. Kauravas and Pandavas. Then Duryodhan bestowed upon him the Princehood of Angadesh leaving Drona no choice but to accept him under his tutelage.
Karna was cursed by parasuram because of his kshatriya status. His adopted parants are kshatriya father and Brahmin mother.he is insulated in draupadi swayamvar because he was not invited still he participated. Insulting someone is bad but karna want to win swayamvar and gift daupadi to duryodhana thats not the way swayamvar works. For all of his life he was taunted for his social status. They called him sutaputra whicheans son of charioteer. Thanks to our tv serials they potreyed it as a caste discrimination rather than status discrimination. Please check the facts before replying to this comment
How status acquired? It's consider earlier status acquired by caste in which he is born (occupational division ) so basically it's a caste discrimination deepdown Kindly read thoroughly
@@trxlori431 status means a class diffrence here. Imagine a business tycoon and their driver. Now the business tycoons 20 children and the driver's son is studying in the same class and same school. Wouldn't he be discriminated against his status of being the driver's son. I'm not saying that it's right I'm just saying that it happened that way.
Karna was cursed not only because he was a sutaputra but also due to his high pain-endurance after the scorpion bite. This level of endurance is only possible for kshatriyas, and therefore, Parasurama believed that Karna lied to him about his caste status.
Bro pls all the things youve said are completly false karna was never discriminated he was a student of guru drona he asked guru drona to teach him the knowledge of brahmastra so he could defeat arjuna upon knowing his intent he refuse so he desguised himself as a brahman and went to parshuram to get the weapon upon knowing the truth he was cursed so the curse was legitimet, also draupadi never rejected karna beacuse he belongs to this or that caste again karna was not just worthy to be droupadis bride by not worthy means he failed to peirce the fishs eye
Lord Krishna:1) killed his nephew (it was sacrifice) . 2)he made Arjun his brother in law, but he didn't thought about the girl who was the wife of Pandavs ..3) he makes hatred between two brothers ( arjun and Karna) .. 4)he had the power to stop the war by telling them the truth about Karna's identity from the beginning of everythings ( i believe duryodhana would have accepted Karna as the King).. 5) he had the power to stop the marriage between Shakuni's sister with a blind man ( that way shakuni wouldn't have become a bad guy.. bad guys aren't born they are made).. I believe he created the war.. There are 3 reason why he made the war .. 1 reason. he was desperate for a competitor who can fight him toe to toe in mind game ( shakuni) . Powerful peoples always want to fight with the stronger opponent but as a god ,he can't break the law. So he participated the war but didn't fight with his divine power but mind power.. 2 reason.Fame .. He wanted to write his name in history .. the most inteligent god.. 3 reason, I'm not telling you.... On the other hand , Karna :1) he was abandoned by his parents on the day he was born.. 2) got new parents but lived poorly. 3)he learns that his parents abandoned him .. even he didn't knew about his birth parents, he never blame someone, he accepted everything.. 4) he had the power to kill all the Pandavas.but he didn't because of a meaningless selfish promise from his birth mother who abandoned him on the day he was born.. 5) he wanted to become the world's best Archer.. is it wrong to become the strongest? everyone wanted to stop him because he was from lowest caste.. 6) he went to guru Suklacharya for learning purpose.. that shameless guy only wanted to make Arjun the world's best .. he didn't took the request, because he's from a low caste family.. 7) he went to find a teacher and lied him about his identity.. is it wrong for a kid to lie his teacher ? He just wanted to learn archery.. 8)he became the greatest archery.. so god plot again, and made him cursed..and he lost all of his divine power.. 9) after loosing the divine power , he only relied on his archery speed and technique.. but God plotted again , and asked to give his armer.. he gave it happily and prayed them . . 10) in the end , Arjun killed Karna, when he was showing his back and took down his Archer.. and Krishna claimed that Arjun was the greatest Archer ( who can't face his opponent face to face.. coweredly trick..humph....) In the Mahabharata, I hate 3 charectors: 1) Krishna, 2) Kunti, 3)Arjun .....
A man must always have two friends. One like Krishna who doesnt fight for you but wants you to win the war. Other like Karna, who fights for you despite knowing you are wrong.
This is nowhere written in the actual Mahabharat Stop being the mouthpiece of the missionaries Drona did educate him Arjuna killed him instantily by chopping his head off so how did he speak?
Beautiful message 👍 Everyone has challenges, even lord Krishna but it is up to you what you do with those challenges. Its your choice to make them your strength or your weakness..
The Fact that Karna stood for what he believed is right and did not cause harm is what made him to be remembered just as Arjuna is. You do remember Duryodhana and Karna is same lines. Being in Pandavas side didn't mean you were on path of Dharma and being on Duryodhana's sise does not mean you were on path of Adharma. Its Mahabharat and not Ramayan. The learning is that you should choose to be upright and be true to your duty as long as your duty speaks of Valour, courage, honesty, truthfulness and gratitude. Eg Take Kargil between Pakistan and India, As Indians you will think the Pakistanis are on wrong side of Dharma. But isn't that that most soldiers in Pakistan side were bound to their motherland and duty and not adharmic. How is their birth, their nationality and pride for serving their nation be regarded as Adharmic. If they had not fought the war once its decared, and run away then its adharmic. Most got Martyred and even Indian Army praised theie valour.
"Life's challenges don't permit the wrong path"
Deep meaning
Deep
Dharma and Truth are two different things. It's Karna's dharma to stay by Duryodhana during the war, but the truth is a different path.
That was a deep one. It opened something in me. 🙏
Superb!!!
God please give me the strength to stay by you
jai shree krishna
Jai shri 🙏Ram
Yeah by typing it in a comment section on TH-cam it will definitely work😂😭
That’s not fair if everything Shri Hari Vishnu will do then what you will do ?
@@RahulSinha-l5u nothing
Life's unfairness doesn't give you license to go on wrong path....Always be on the path of Dharma.....🙏
Krishna is the God and he had all the powers and knowledgeof GOD.
Its easy for him to overcome all hurdles of life.. and stick with his dharma .After all, he is the creator of all life and dharma.
How could it be comparable to a mortal like karna??
@@amlankaushik2168However he never used his powers on whim. Also, Karna always complained about him being treated unfairly but even Krishna had to receive curse from Gandhari and had his family decimated. Even today many people say Krishna were partial towards pandavas but none observe the reasons behind that. Krishna is always on the side of dharma, he sees no one above dharma not even himself
@@amlankaushik2168 he took the Rupa of a human, he was in flesh.
@@amlankaushik2168Shri Krishna lived his life in the mortal world by performing karma . He took a mortal body and lived his life like an ordinary human . He wanted to show that you can live your life by performing karma .
@@amlankaushik2168 Karna wasn't the only one who suffered. But surely the one who got on doing adharma faster than the others. Ashwatthama was mocked at by his friends at a young age for his poverty, had to be bound to Duryodhana, and side with him in the war even though he wanted to avert it and had to be witnessing his father being killed in front of him. Did he side with adharma then? Only when Duryodhana was killed, Ashwatthama was moved and did his wrongs. Yudhishthira lost his father at a young age and became the guardian for his brothers and mother from then. His brother was poisoned twice. He was always defied by Duryodhana and Karna in the ashrama. He became the heir-apparent at his own qualities but was sent to be burnt to death with his family. He received a barren half of the kingdom to rule while he deserved a proper half. He never ever mistreated any Kaurava despite their misgivings. He time and again refused to attend the gambling match, to Vidura and to Shakuni but no one listened. He stayed quite for all of those injustices done on him. Yes he was wrong to have staked his wife, and his brothers. But he repented more than all the others. Even after his wife was disrespected as such and he had robbed off of all possesions, he sent multiple peace treaties, only if it could stop the war. And though he was the one who always wanted peace, he became a cause for this entire war and was guilt ridden forever. Was life not harsh to him? And yet at last, despite his uncle being a root cause to the war and all the harms inflicted on him and his family, he cared for his uncle enough to change the heart of Dhritarashtra even. That's the difference. Everyone was wrong. But some tried their best not to be.
I can feel Karna. He knew that he was in a wrong path but he was silent bcz of his loyalty. We can blame him, but if we were in his position, I can't say what would we do
Bruh that was the reason of this character to teach all of us the lesson. And here you are saying we don't know what to do?
He could’ve been loyal by telling truth to his friend and maybe they both would’ve been better off. But instead he chose blind loyalty. They’re both just as guilty. If u love someone, b loyal by telling d truth and doing d right thing. He didn’t choose loyalty he chose doom. He’s guilty
@@YeH592 I am saying this focusing on this Kaliyug.
@@RojaJaneman Yes, He Was guilty indeed
@@RojaJanemanBruh, duryodhana didn't even listen to Krishna, would he have listened to karna? 💀
When you help a man in his lowest he will remember you always.
Life's challenges don't permit wrong path. VERY IMPORTANT
Krishna is wrong. Krishna is Vishnu himself so he can literally change his lifepath irrespective of his challenges unlike Karna who is a regular human who cant control his fate
@@user-ml6jb8hr4iKarna could have easily fought for the pandavas line Yuyutsu. Or stayed out of the war like Rukma and balarama.
@@diplocolus1439Krishna used his godly powers multiple times to change the outcome of events in life and of those around him prior to the final Mahabharat war. So no, this saying cannot be applied to a human who has no power to change events outside his control.
@@EdwinTyler karna could have stayed out of the war like Rukmi. Or switched sides like yuyutsu. Or at least not insulted Draupadi or attacked abhimamyu from behind.
@@diplocolus1439easily kar skta tha yeh bolna bohot asan. When life has been unfair to you, it is difficult and that is okay. Karna ne jo kia woh sahi kiya. Uske liye no one stood up. Not the pandavas, nor krishna. Duryodhan stood up for him and gave him status and opportunity. Toh usnei duryodhan ka sath diya, baat khatam. Krisha ka kya jaata hai gyan pelne ko. Jo jita hai usi ko samajhta hai.
As a Buddhist, i'm a strong follower of Dharma. And i respect Hinduism as it contains so many wisdom 🙏
As a Hindu I also respect Buddhism and lord Buddha. Peaceful religions and both have ideology of 'karma'
Budha was hindu to begin with
Could you share 50 or 20 or 10 ... or at least 5 main guidelines of DHARMA ... that could be conveyed to common people to follow ?
A real Buddhist.
All buddhist are hindus. If you know that Bhagvaan Buddha was a reincarnation of Sri Hari
Also reminds me of Harry Potter: Dumbledore says “it’s not our abilities that make us who we are but our choices. Given a choice choose what’s right not what easy.”
And karna chose the right path he chose rationslism over conservatives if you feel any blame on kauravas krishna himself admits to balarama suyodhana was killed because he was against varna dharma he wanted to give open choices to all which would cause chaos
Dude went from the Geeta to Harry Potter
This is just 😂😂😂😂
@@pv9214only you😅
Harry Potter is Gita for this wannabe 😂
@@abhinavwa28 he said, it reminded of the line from harry potter.
Chill out bro
Best answer to people who cry "Villains aren't born they are made"
There's always a choice to be the better person
Why to expect in the first place when you can't even treat them well from the very start, hypocrisy at its peak
True but for some people it's hard for them to choose better decisions because of the influence around them. He wasn't entirely a bad person. What we should learn from his story is that we should help people when they're suffering so that they don't cause harm in the future.
@@Water_blade2011 Why can't we fight this outsider influence like Lord Krishna does? What's stopping us?
Harder said than done. When pain and injustice are all you know your whole life, not having a vengeful, hate-filled, and pessimistic attitude towards it all is nearly impossible.
@@loremipsum980True
One thing you said wrong. Parsuram kick him out for hiding his real identity. Parsuram told him that he would teach anyone irrespective of who he is. He kick Karn out for lying
No he vowed not to teach to kshatriyas. But Karn didn't know he was a kshatriya because he grew up as the chariot rider's son.
Parashuram kicked him out for concealing his identity but parashuram wouldn't even have taught him a word if karna had been honest. Karna had no other option but to lie.
@@clairedelune6482 as far I remember karn disguise as Brahman not sudha.
@@Morpheus_neo_trinity as far I remember parsuram tell karn that he should have use his real identity not fake one after kicking him out.
@@hello08763 Karna went to drona and was rejected for not being a brahmana,so then karna put on a fake sacred thread, went to parashurama and pretended to be a Brahmana since he knew parashurama would not accept anyone other than Brahmana as his disciple. If education was imparted to anyone regardless of their Varna karna would never have lied to parashurama, parashurama was so mad at karna that he wasn't ready to believe Karna when he said he was suta Putra and wasn't a kshatriya,he still believed him to be a kshatriya disguising himself as suta Putra.
Yes hes right god gives us the brain to make right choices.
Not by This society
@@graceprince09he literally said that, your own choices matter, society can go to hell, you have your own brain.
Krishna is the God and he had all the powers and knowledgeof GOD.
Its easy for him to overcome all hurdles of life.. and stick with his dharma .After all, he is the creator of all life and dharma.
How could it be comparable to a mortal like karna??
@@amlankaushik2168😂 Krishna is a form of God in human form. He was no mortal. He had his birth and death. So his actions were applied to normal people.
@@amlankaushik2168u posting same illogical thing everywhere
To everyone in this comment section, if someone else has their facts wrong or something, pls don't be harsh with them. You've never even met them before. Knowledge should be shared not braged about, so share things wholeheartedly.
Boy, does social media like Reddit need your words of wisdom
Comments like these remind me there is still hope for humanity.
🙏🤍
@@vijayravi56 you just have to look in the right places
This whole reply section along with the comment is so blessed!🙌
Perfect ❤️❤️❤️ Every words of Krishna is perfect 🫂🙏
If Karna was a real friend of Duryodhana then it was his duty to stop him from Adharma like What he did with Draupadi and many things..
Lord Krishna always tried hard to turn up Karna against Adharma but nothing works.
Jai Shree Krishna❤
Bro what are the adharma and many things committed by duryodhana, kindly tell me if you know or just leave it if you dont know ,but dont say like every thing he did was adharma ,please tell me what are the things he did were adhama
1)droupadi vastraharan
2)pandavo ko jalana
3)bhim ko sap se dasvana aur jahar pilana
4)pandavo ko sui ki nok ke barabar bhi jameen nahi dena chahta tha ahankar me
aur bohot adharm kiye hai , usme ye sab karne ki buddhi bhi nahi thi , karn aur mama shakuni ne use bhadkaya har samay
@@monkeygamer2565
brother adharma for dharama is not bad.thats why krishna and other also do adharama
@@monkeygamer2565
Even a kid knows that.... What Duryodhana and his brothers did with Panchali, even duryodhan and shakuni tried to kill Pandavas, So many times.
If you don't know...then pls watch Mahabharat.
@@ongaming007 You are right bro...In order to protect dharma, If necessary can do Adharma.
It is called as ApadDharma (Dharma Appropriate at the time of calamity)
NEVER remember your unlucky moments, but always counts your blessing! Very good lessons from Krishna's words... 🙏🙏🙏
It is true all the Karna got humiliation abd rejection even though having talent and ability.
But Karna made mistake when he was silent about Vastra haran of Droupadi and he took side of Duryadhan even though he knew he is with Adharma.
Jai Shri Krishna
Correct
Bro pls go and read the actual mahabharat karna is a pure villian he was a student of guru drona and he went to parshuram to learn the knowledge of brahmastra so he can defeat arjun and disguised himself as a brahim so prashiram will taught him his curse was legitimet also it was karna who was motivating dushasan to strip draupadi even it is shown in the br chopras mahabharat
Jai Karna
@@ashura6626 Finally someone who read Mahabharata!
@@ashura6626 Well, him motivating durshasan was called upon, considering how he was insulted in Draupadi's swayamvar.
Karna is my favourite character in Mahabharata.
Sure he did mistakes, like not stopping duryodhan from humiliating a woman (draupadi). Maybe it was because he also resented her, but in my opinion humialiting woman just because she had humiliated her is unjust. But he was truly a good person, because he had donated so much, to the point that he took an oath to give anything a person asks from him to the person in need. That is why he is called "Danveer Karna". He is also inspirational. Despite facing so many hardships, he succeeded in learning the art of the bow.
Hare krishna, Om namo suryadev
Good person..😂😂
He was the one who ( rather the only one) who called her Draupadi a prostitute , if she has 5 husbands.., she can have more .., he was the one who gave the idea of disrobing ……..
please go read the original Mahabharatha.
😂😂 hero …🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
Also his benevolence and Danveer nature was a part of his ego. He enjoyed the fact that he was the most charitable and everyone thought of him
As that.
@@swethab6572 I'm not calling him a hero, he had his bad sides and good sides, the fact is that he DID donate anything that was asked from him. He is not the most perfect character, and certainly not someone who is to your sole role model, but nonetheless he was a good person, and he is inspirational in many aspects, but not all.
@@TheseksiXae my sincere request.. read the original … it’s voluminous, it’s tedious .. but BORI and Gita press have done an efficient job. Before forming opinions… please try to read.
Or a simpler , concise version is Ami Ganatra’s Mahabharatha unravelled …
P.S : not here to promote certain books , but want all to read originals before forming opinions.
@@TheseksiXae also he donated .. becoz of his ego and satisfying that.
Haven’t you met such fame / name cravers who do stuff so that they are praised and in limelight. Are they doing that Dharmic thing for the right reason??
He did for Laurels ..!
No animosity against Karna… he isn’t my enemy
Karna is synonym of Loyalty ❤❤❤
but he wasn't loyal to dharma ... his loyalty was only towards his own gain
Karna is the son of the Surya dev (The Sun God) and Kunti (while she was engaged to be married to King Pandu). Kunti in fear of the society acceptance by King Pandu, put baby Karna in a basket boat in the river. He was found and raised by a Kshatriya Charioteer who was married to a Brahmin woman, Radha. Hence, he was known as Radheya (son of Radha, shuit).
I don’t think she was engaged to pandu at that time. This incident was many years ago it is never mentioned that she was engaged
@@amartyapandityes
Kunti was not engaged to anyone. She married pandu by swayamvara which means the bride can choose a king whom she likes out of many kings that were invited.@@amartyapandit
@@amartyapandityes she was not engaged that time, but she did very wrong thing when she threw her infant son in river... People blame karna because those people living good life, even they don't get 5% of sufferings similar to karna.
If only 5% of sufferings or 5% of injustice would come in their lives, they gonna mad and they won't care for dharma or anything.... that's reality of people.
@@vishalrao4073she would have gotten banished from the society herself had he not gave away Karna.
Hare Krishna 🌸
The iconic Mahabharata song, that's amazing.
What is the Song's name?
@@androrana ''hai katha sangram ki ''
Karna was the only person who had dream of happening of Mahabharata war. He narrated to Krishna that he saw ashwatathama wearing white turban and gearing up for war. He told he saw yudhishthir climbing up the mountains of skull and eating ghee and sugar. Karna when spoke his agony, Krishna didn't even replied. Karna told Krishna that ashwatathama, duryodhana etc are merely casts of time. Listening this Krishna laughed and invited him to the side of pandavas to which he denied. He told Krishna that he will meet him in heaven post his death. He hugged Krishna and went to his path. Source Mahabharata Gita press Gorakhpur
😢😢
Few people easily blame karna because those people living good life, they don't get even 5% of sufferings similar to karna.
If only 5% of Karna's sufferings or 5% of injustice would come in their lives, they gonna mad and they won't care for dharma or anything.... that's reality of people.
And those people don't have 5% of determination and bravery as of Karna, but they can put finger towards Karna easily.
When Mahabharat war started, Kunti went to meet Karna and then she revealed that he is elder son of pandavas and she requested him to not kill his brothers, and she even invited him to join her family of pandavas now.
Then Karna replied that he can't leave Duryodhan in middle for his own benefits. Duryodhan is always bigger and valuable for Karna than his own brothers. And Karna also asked to Kunti that why she is inviting him now to join family when she threw him in river at first place when he was infant baby?
Karna also promised to Kunti that he will not kill rest of 4 brothers, but arjun is his enemy, so he would not let arjun go.
And Karna kept his promise in battle, he had forgiven lives of rest of 4 brothers when he defeated all of them and he could kill them easily, but he forgiven them.
Fun Fact : Karna got his education from guru dronacharya, Kripacharyaa and Parshuram. Guru drona didn't taught celestial weapons(i.e: bharmastra)to Karna and that's the only reason he went fro parshuram.
These bloody half baked youtubers only saw the TV serials and making videos on scriptures 😂😂😂 Great time we live in where lies are appreciated....
This was the comment I was looking for!
What about Drona's promise to make Arjuna the world's best danurdhar and for this, he asks Eklavyas his thumb for guru dakshina? If it's true, doesn't it mean that Guru drona was biased towards that Arjuna? He taught his son Ashwatthama and Arjuna about Brahmastra but why did he declined Karna's request??
I am trying to convince this to my mind ..
But question arises.
Why a guru will give education to a lowe cast poor child in the same class of princes ??
Isn't it weired that 105 Rajkumar and 1 Sutputr were studying in same class ?
Besides karan is their anyone did guru drona teach toh any other normal and lower class student ?
If not then what's the reason he is only teaching to karna and Rajkumar in that same batch ?
@@vikashpal4875eklavya was planning to destroy hastinapur
@@vikashpal4875Sir kindly read the Chapter 1 of Mahabharata. Eklavya introduced himself as the eldest son of Commander in Chief of Magadh King Jarasandh, Hiranyadhanu. Magadh had previously attacked many a times on Hastinapur. So you want Dronacharya the Rajguru of Hastinapur to create a weapon for Jarasandh to be used against Hastinapur itself? Do you support that we should teach our hostile neighbours the art of war? Again even today the teachers of a school are not expected to tutor students outside school. So, how was Dronacharya wrong? Not only Karna his brothers were also along with many students were taught by Dronacharya. You can easily find it in the first chapter itself.
The Shrimad Bhagvad Gita is a blessing to mankind! It teaches us the way of life & gives the solutions to our problems in every situation! Blessed to be born in this culture! #RadheRadhe #HareKrishna #BhagvadGita #India #Hindu #SanatanDharma #SanatanDharam #JaiHind
Brilliant lesson ❤❤❤
For those who are sympathetic towards Karna for being loyal, I think Dharma comes before any loyalty or other feelings.
If someone has done a favor towards you, you should definitely be grateful. However, if that person asks you to support him in robbing a bank, or cheating someone, or killing someone in return of that favor, then being loyal is not only foolish but also unethical ✅️✅️✅️
the reason why krishna explained this to karna with no hesitation was because whatever struggles he faced from his childhood till his destined death was known by him,he was one step ahead of what was going to happen as he knew what was going to happen,but karna was just an ordinary human,he wasnt the ultimate being like krishna,so it was human of him to ask krishna this question for his justice and insults throughout his life
Lord Krishna may be ultimate being but he acted like human. So I think it's reasonable to compare his difficulties with Karna. He used his divine prowess only to teach dharm and to save parikshith. 😊
Once you step on this road there is no way to go back... unless you are God or reverse the time there is no way to know that this will happen in the future or to know the outcome...karna was neither God or a time reverser....
Once you owe your dignity to someone else there is no way to pay back with any material
Brother go read Maharishi Ved Vyasa's Mahabharata The Stories About Karna Are So Different Than What They Showed In Tv Serials And In So called Historic Educational Videos.
Jai Shree Krishna 🙏🙏 Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏
Actually based on the Mahabharat scripture, Karna did received his education from Guru Dhronacharya with the other princes, since his father was a Kshatriya working as a Royal Charioteer of the King Dhrutrastra. Karna wanted to learn more advanced divine weaponry, for which Dhronacharya refused, since he saw his dark side of competition from Arjun. However, Karna did receive one-on-one advanced training from Lord Parashuram (6th Avatar of Vishnu) even if he was not a pure Kshatriya and his mother was a Brahmin (shuit). Parashuram later found out that Karna had lied about his origin and that he was actually a pure Kshatriya, so he cursed him that when Karna will really need his advanced weaponry knowledge the most, it will not work for him.
Krishna is the most confident man that was ever born in this world.
He really believed in what he said, he really believed that he was a god. ❤
yep serial watcher, read the real version which is told by vedavyas not serial maal masala mahabharat
Can't get such a profound teaching anywhere else which teaches how an individual should act in any situation ❤
Nothing goes unfair, whatever difficulties they have faced but today these 2 warriors are the most respected characters in mahabharatha story ❤
Om namo Narayana
Wrong recitation: It is correctly recited as "Om namo Narayanaya".
Om namo narayana
Govinda govinda
@@Rama_Rama_Rama yeah you are right. But it doesn't matter how a man says god's name as long as he has faith and love for God.
Karna did the right thing. Dying for a friend whom he was loyal to is the right thing to do rather than switch sides to save his brothers who didn't know he was elder to the Pandavas. His life teaches us gratitude, loyalty, sacrifice, and the will to overcome pain and humiliation 👍
as a matter of fact that was the only wrong thing he did.... Duryodhana was cruel and represented adharma.... instead of fighting and dying for him, he could have stopped or educated Duryodhana.... supporting Duryodhana was like supporting all his wrong doings....and there can be no excuse for that
@@bumblebee264 May sound true but in Mahabaratha, Dharma is quite complicated and can be overwhelming if put under research from the general perspective. Sometimes, it's beyond human comprehension and only Krishna understood the intricacies. Dhuryodhana crowned Karna as a king while Pandavas mocked him owing to his birth as "Soodhaputra". Karna decided he owed his life to Dhuryodhana from that moment. And changing Dhuryodhana was impossible even for Krishna, the lord's own incarnation. How can Karna hope to change him?
@@krishnamohan5523 I think it was more about convenience on Karna's part to keep supporting Duryodhana and not even trying or objecting to any of his actions....Mahabharat comes after Ramayan, and Ramayan has Bibhishan's example of choosing right over his own brother....also Duryodhan saw Karna's skills and manipulated him into supporting him by showering many goodies...just like politicians do nowadays in their constituencies...Karna, just like Bhishma and Dronacharya were blinded by the debt of Duryodhan to such an extent that they could not act against any wrong
@@bumblebee264 True, but it's more of standing by his word rather than convenience. If it was just convenience, Karna would have changed sides once Kunti broke the mystery about his birth. And by that time, he had lost his Kavacha kundala to Indra, and he was well aware that Indra was Arjun's God-dad before even giving it away. He knew he was not invincible anymore since he lost them. And even before that, he knew Kouravas would never win this war as Krishna Paramatma was on the Pandava side. So, he definitely chose the most painful way to die. Dhuryodhana was an arrogant prick who would enemize anyone who gave him good advice. If Karna persuaded him, he would have done this to Karna too. Maybe he could have even pointed out that Karna was able to keep up his dignity only because of him. Karna knew this at the bottom of his heart. So, whatever it may take, he decided to support him and pay him back with death if that is what is needed out of him. That's the reason he is still spoken of
@@krishnamohan5523 whatever you said makes sense....now coming back to your original point about whatever Karna did was right....thats exactly what Bhagwan Krishna said....for him it seemed the right thing to do because of all those reasons....but for others who now say that he was right, it is as if they did not learn the lesson at all....Karna, Bhishma, Drona and many more did not realize what was greater good and opted a glorious death to be remembered as a hero while siding with wrong, over a rather less glamorous but right approach....after knowing everything, if you say Karna was right, then you have not completely come out of the illusion which Karna had....that means in one way the learning is not registered in you....and god forbid, if you come across a situation like Karna....the question would be, what will you choose?
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare. Radhe Radhe....❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤....
I am not Hindu but I like to learn everything so I am glad TH-cam sent me to this video. Thank you, video makers.
Read from books this perticular video is also distorted some facts as it is taken from a TV series
Valmiki Ramayan
Bhagavad Gita are two important ones if you want to know Shiv ji and mother parvati then go for shiv Puran
Jai Shree Krishna 🙏🙏🚩🚩🙏🙏
First of all karna is a human so the external environment can affect him whereas Krishna is a self realised soul. Nothing makes him angry, sad, happy, etc.., so there is no difficulty for Krishna. Krishna knows past, present and future and the ability to change it also
Sri Krishna suffers himself to teach the people that they have to follow dharm at any situation, dont consider karna as a hero
Every man has his own problems
Take the stories of all other avatars,even they had problems
That's what Krishna is telling him with adharma you're destined to lose
Arjuna was not only a great Archer or valor warrior but a great great devotee of Krishna
He accepts anything that Krishna orders him
Everyone in the Mahabharata knew Krishna was God himself
Karna too, but instead of asking the supreme being for his help he went to duryodhana
Surrender to god and you will be taken care of
@@parmar__12 I believe reiging in hell rather than serving i heaven.. I will side Duryodhana 100 times when he gave me the identity I wanted..
@@countluciferderebelis226 their is no reigning In hell lol
That man couldn't even tolerate the humility of this world forget about having a thick skin to rule in hell
After all you get what you deserve
He wanted to be a king by any means necessary then he died by any means necessary
Why crow about it in front of lord then
Just take your punishment silently
Don't talk about justice and injustice if you want to get your desired goal by any means
And not by surrendering to God
God gave sudama two world of riches without even asking and was willing to give his own vaikunth lok too
That's the power of surrendering in front of lord
@@countluciferderebelis226 you mean you'll side s*xual assualt enabler? Wow nice values you got there 😂 do us a favour and stay there
Jai shree Radhekrishna
Jai parvathiparmashwara
Jai shri krishna ji ki🙏❤️
The teachings of krishna is just too much pure for mankind❤
Hare Krishna🙏🙏🙏
I too pray God to give me that strength to do Dharma whatever the situation may be 😢
In no way I am saying what Karna did was right but I can bet on it that if any of us were in his place.. we'd have probably made the same choices that he made. After knowing what's right and wrong, saying Karna was wrong is easy but being in his place and experiencing all the bad things that he went through is something we'll never understand. He is called "Daan veer" for a reason. He has done a lot of good for the people as well but many people chose to ignore it. To me he'll always be my favourite and the most misunderstood person from the entire Mahabharata.
This reply always gives me courage and i always cry 😢😢❤❤
Beautiful explanation 😇
Krishna forgot to mention that he is literally a God. The avatar of Hari Vishnu.
The whole universe belongs to him.
How can there be a comparison between a God and a mortal?
This is the main point of this story bro
Even god has to suffer from problems because dosnt matter he was a god
At end of day he was living a human life
Krishna said that I can end the war in few seconds but he was doing karma(duty)
Lesson in this story is that no matter how worse situation gets don't leave hand of righteousness
@@hemantdhasmana3030 If he was living a human being how was he able to lift a mountain with his little finger?
If he was living like a human being how did he manage to create and use Sudarshan Chakra?
Can a mortal lift a mountain on his finger, can a mortal create Sudarshan Chakra?
He had divine powers because he is himself the divine.
How can he claim to be mortal?
@@aavinashchaliha7810that's the moral of the story
Surrender in front of God not in front of immoral people like duryodhan
What people don't talk about or show is,how great of a Yogi and tapasvi and bhakt Arjuna was
He was the biggest devotee of Krishna even in vanvaas they never felt any hardship aand sang bhajans of krishna which they ofcourse used to do even when they were king
He followed Krishna everywhere and had immense faith in him
Except the only time when they didn't want help due to embarassment was in dhyuth krida where they lost badly and suffered
Krishna was a Yogi of the highest order and steady in his heart with Krishna's devotion
@@parmar__12 What act of immorality did Duryodhan commit?
@@aavinashchaliha7810 like dusro ing your Bhabhi or any lady in front of your father guru uncle and who not or try to burn Pandavas alive ?
The beauty of Hinduism, follow dharma
Few people easily blame karna because those people living good life, they don't get even 5% of sufferings similar to karna.
If only 5% of Karna's sufferings or 5% of injustice would come in their lives, they gonna mad and they won't care for dharma or anything.... that's reality of people.
And those people don't have 5% of determination and bravery as of Karna, but they can put finger towards Karna easily.
When Mahabharat war started, Kunti went to meet Karna and then she revealed that he is elder son of pandavas and she requested him to not kill his brothers, and she even invited him to join her family of pandavas now.
Then Karna replied that he can't leave Duryodhan in middle for his own benefits. Duryodhan is always bigger and valuable for Karna than his own brothers. And Karna also asked to Kunti that why she is inviting him now to join family when she threw him in river at first place when he was infant baby?
Karna also promised to Kunti that he will not kill rest of 4 brothers, but arjun is his enemy, so he would not let arjun go.
And Karna kept his promise in battle, he had forgiven lives of rest of 4 brothers when he defeated all of them and he could kill them easily, but he forgiven them.
🙏🙏Jai Shri Ram 🙏🙏
🙏🙏Jai Shri Krishna 🙏🙏
Educate yourself . Karna was a student of Dronacharya just like other students. Dronacharya also taught the Vrushnis( Yadavs) students from Sri Krushnas clan and other students too. And Parshuram cursed Karna cause he lied that he was a Brahmin. Karna was not disgraced in Draupadis swayamvar. He couldnot put prattancha on the bow that was kept there. Read Mahabharat from Gita Press.
Educate yourself. There are multiple version of the Mahabharata and the Gita Press's word is not the gospel. There happens versions of the Mahabharata where Karna gets rejected by Draupati for being a son of a charioteer.
@@zhozhoe Karna was the king of Anga desh. So it did not matter who his father was. The bet placed in the Swayamvar was " who ever could pierce the moving target successfully by looking at its refection in the water below could marry Draupadi". Arjun was dressed as a Bramhin and still could participate in the swayamvar proves anyone could participate. Just like it did not matter who Satyavati ( matsya gandha) was. She was the daughter of a fisherman( a shudra) and king Shantanu married her. She was Bhisma pitamahas step mother. Krushna Dwaipayan Vyas was the son of Satyavati. He wrote Mahabharat. Did it matter ??. No...! Vidur was a son of a shudra woman did it matter ?? No..! You can find multiple examples like this in Mahabharat.
There is a difference between a Sarathi and a charioteer. You have to trust your sarathi with your life. He is the person safeguarding you when you are at war. Shree Krushna was Arjuns sarathi in Mahabharat war. Shalya ( Madri's brother and Nakul and Sahadev's mama) king of Madra Desh was sarathi of Karna in Mahabharat war. It was not looked down upon to be a Sarathi. Instead it was a job given to a very close and trusted person. Sanjai was Dhrutarastra's sarathi who was given divya drusti by Ved Vyas ji so that he could see the whole war and narrate it to pradnyachakshu (blind)Dhrutarastra.
A total "WAIT FOR IT" moment ❤
In story Karna chose the right path just appreciate it move forward don't cry he had ups and downs just like everyone
Yes blaming others for your mistakes and poor choices doesn't cut it. It's better to be grateful for the love and opportunity you were provided.
🕉️Radhe Radhe🙏
karna is one of the handful individuals i wholeheartedly respect
Karna made mistake when he was silent about Vastra haran of Droupadi and he took side of Duryadhan even though he knew he is with Adharma.
@@Diptimayee_Das I accept that Karnan and His friends are wrong . But Why Pandavas are right ?! They accept to do gambling with their Wife as if She was an Object ?! Why ?! Isn't that Wrong ?! Why God didn't punish them since They disrespected their Wife by agreeing that Condition ?! Why They were silent When Injustice is happening to their wife ?! It is their dharma ?! Krishnan did anything to them for this ?!
Indeed. Right will always be right.
Well Said @journeythrough3
I’ve been learning a lot from you 😊
May God bless you 🎉
Life's challenge doesn't permit you to take wrong path. Nice line
Yes Dharma has to be upheld, no matter what the situation you have to encounter in life🙏👍
So true❤
Jay param krishna ki jay❤
Lord Karana is woorshiped in Himachal Pradesh (Mandi) . He is known as Mahunag
Jai devta Mahunag ji
Some facts are wrong here.
Karna was indeed trained by Drona. And there was no caste angle.
Please do read the original Vyasa Mahabharatha
Caste is no varna
Yess right he dint read it but only saw on starplus....he badly needs to read it thoroughly by himself
Read the Mahabharat. Drona refused to train Karna at first because he was Sutaputra, of not equal status to be training with the princes i.e. Kauravas and Pandavas.
Then Duryodhan bestowed upon him the Princehood of Angadesh leaving Drona no choice but to accept him under his tutelage.
Which publication you suggest for vyas Mahabharata?
@@__inuyasha__208 geeta press gorakhpur
Jay Shree Radhe Krishna❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻
Jai Shree Hari Narayan..☺🌍🙏
Karn's character is impeccable. Evn if he was on the side of adharm & could switch he chose to die & be loyal to his blood & friend
What Karna did was absolutely right!!!
Stayed true to himself and to the person he owes a lot
Karna deserved to be king
He did became king of Anga. Angaraaj Karna he was called.
He was already a king
@@_ratnaputra_ I meant king of hastinapur and not only Anga
@@investorappu1271 yes.. but he deserved to rule the realm and not just one kingdom
@@manojshankar8255 The total war was for Kings seat and they failed
War is fought for Hastinapur
Jai shree radhekrishnan 🙏🙏🙏
Nice 😊😊 Hare Krishna Radhe Radhe ❤❤😊
Karna was cursed by parasuram because of his kshatriya status. His adopted parants are kshatriya father and Brahmin mother.he is insulated in draupadi swayamvar because he was not invited still he participated. Insulting someone is bad but karna want to win swayamvar and gift daupadi to duryodhana thats not the way swayamvar works.
For all of his life he was taunted for his social status. They called him sutaputra whicheans son of charioteer. Thanks to our tv serials they potreyed it as a caste discrimination rather than status discrimination.
Please check the facts before replying to this comment
How status acquired? It's consider earlier status acquired by caste in which he is born (occupational division ) so basically it's a caste discrimination deepdown
Kindly read thoroughly
@@trxlori431 status means a class diffrence here. Imagine a business tycoon and their driver. Now the business tycoons 20 children and the driver's son is studying in the same class and same school. Wouldn't he be discriminated against his status of being the driver's son. I'm not saying that it's right I'm just saying that it happened that way.
@@trxlori431stupid mthfckr there is no caste in Hindusim debate with me
@@trxlori431caste is different thing varna is diff thing first get proper knowledge
Karna was cursed not only because he was a sutaputra but also due to his high pain-endurance after the scorpion bite. This level of endurance is only possible for kshatriyas, and therefore, Parasurama believed that Karna lied to him about his caste status.
no excuses for not following DHARMA 🕉
जय जगन्नाथ
Bro pls all the things youve said are completly false karna was never discriminated he was a student of guru drona he asked guru drona to teach him the knowledge of brahmastra so he could defeat arjuna upon knowing his intent he refuse so he desguised himself as a brahman and went to parshuram to get the weapon upon knowing the truth he was cursed so the curse was legitimet, also draupadi never rejected karna beacuse he belongs to this or that caste again karna was not just worthy to be droupadis bride by not worthy means he failed to peirce the fishs eye
He was NOT allowed to participate because he was an illegitimate son.
He was NOT allowed to participate because he was an illegitimate son.
Even though he was wrong, most of us still have a soft corner for Karna
JAI SHREE KRISHNA🙏🙏
Lord Krishna:1) killed his nephew (it was sacrifice) . 2)he made Arjun his brother in law, but he didn't thought about the girl who was the wife of Pandavs ..3) he makes hatred between two brothers ( arjun and Karna) .. 4)he had the power to stop the war by telling them the truth about Karna's identity from the beginning of everythings ( i believe duryodhana would have accepted Karna as the King).. 5) he had the power to stop the marriage between Shakuni's sister with a blind man ( that way shakuni wouldn't have become a bad guy.. bad guys aren't born they are made).. I believe he created the war.. There are 3 reason why he made the war .. 1 reason. he was desperate for a competitor who can fight him toe to toe in mind game ( shakuni) . Powerful peoples always want to fight with the stronger opponent but as a god ,he can't break the law. So he participated the war but didn't fight with his divine power but mind power..
2 reason.Fame .. He wanted to write his name in history .. the most inteligent god..
3 reason, I'm not telling you....
On the other hand ,
Karna :1) he was abandoned by his parents on the day he was born..
2) got new parents but lived poorly.
3)he learns that his parents abandoned him .. even he didn't knew about his birth parents, he never blame someone, he accepted everything..
4) he had the power to kill all the Pandavas.but he didn't because of a meaningless selfish promise from his birth mother who abandoned him on the day he was born..
5) he wanted to become the world's best Archer.. is it wrong to become the strongest? everyone wanted to stop him because he was from lowest caste..
6) he went to guru Suklacharya for learning purpose.. that shameless guy only wanted to make Arjun the world's best .. he didn't took the request, because he's from a low caste family..
7) he went to find a teacher and lied him about his identity.. is it wrong for a kid to lie his teacher ? He just wanted to learn archery..
8)he became the greatest archery.. so god plot again, and made him cursed..and he lost all of his divine power..
9) after loosing the divine power , he only relied on his archery speed and technique.. but God plotted again , and asked to give his armer.. he gave it happily and prayed them . .
10) in the end , Arjun killed Karna, when he was showing his back and took down his Archer.. and Krishna claimed that Arjun was the greatest Archer ( who can't face his opponent face to face.. coweredly trick..humph....)
In the Mahabharata, I hate 3 charectors: 1) Krishna, 2) Kunti, 3)Arjun .....
After your comments i realised that you didn't know the full Mahabharata
These all things or actions done by the actor only not by Krishna so your logic is in your dillu world .
A man must always have two friends.
One like Krishna who doesnt fight for you but wants you to win the war.
Other like Karna, who fights for you despite knowing you are wrong.
And leave you five times when you are grave danger.. Yeah everyone should have friend like karn 😂
This is nowhere written in the actual Mahabharat
Stop being the mouthpiece of the missionaries
Drona did educate him
Arjuna killed him instantily by chopping his head off so how did he speak?
Beautiful message 👍
Everyone has challenges, even lord Krishna but it is up to you what you do with those challenges. Its your choice to make them your strength or your weakness..
Hare Krishna 🙏🏻💛💙🌸
Such an important lesson and so relevant today! ❤❤❤
Jai Shree Radha Krishna 💜💜💙💙💛💛🤎🤎🧡🧡💚💚🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💜💜💙💙💛💛🤎🤎🧡🧡💚💚
I needed this today.
Wow, such a beautiful explanation 😍❤
Bro 😎 I appreciate you leant our ancient times
Jai shree krishna 🙏🏻❤️❤️❤️
Radhe Radhe 🫂💕🌙🙏🏼🙏
Now I understand why Lord Krishna is Every Hindus Favorite Deity
JAI RADHE KRISHNA♥️♥️🙏🙏❤️❤️
Hare Krishna 💞
Whatever videos you have created on some level but this video is on another level . Very much echoed in my head
Jai Shree Ram, Jai Sita Mata, Jai Hanuman, Radhe Krishna, Har Har Mahadev 💐🙏😊🥰
Greatest words by Shri Krishna
Even though I am a muslim, this story brings tears in my eyes.
The Fact that Karna stood for what he believed is right and did not cause harm is what made him to be remembered just as Arjuna is. You do remember Duryodhana and Karna is same lines.
Being in Pandavas side didn't mean you were on path of Dharma and being on Duryodhana's sise does not mean you were on path of Adharma. Its Mahabharat and not Ramayan.
The learning is that you should choose to be upright and be true to your duty as long as your duty speaks of Valour, courage, honesty, truthfulness and gratitude.
Eg Take Kargil between Pakistan and India, As Indians you will think the Pakistanis are on wrong side of Dharma. But isn't that that most soldiers in Pakistan side were bound to their motherland and duty and not adharmic. How is their birth, their nationality and pride for serving their nation be regarded as Adharmic. If they had not fought the war once its decared, and run away then its adharmic. Most got Martyred and even Indian Army praised theie valour.
Jai Shree Krishna❤
Jai Shree Ram Jai Shree Hanuman🚩🚩🙏🙏
Krishna tells the truth life is unfair
🍀🍀🍀🍀❤❤❤❤🕊🕊🕊🕊💛💛💛💛🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾HARIH🕉🕉🕉🕉JAI SHRĪ KRISHNA🕉🕉🕉🕉HRĪM NAMAH💘💘💘💘💋💋💋💋😭😭😭😭💋💋💋💋❤❤❤❤🤑🤑🤑🤑❤❤❤❤🙂🙂🙂🙂💋💋💋💋🌹🌹🌹🌹❤❤❤❤😘😘😘😘💋💋💋💋🍑🍑🍑🍑💎💎💎💎🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🕉🕉🕉🕉🥇🥇🥇🥇🏆🏆🏆🏆🥇🥇🥇🥇💖💖💖💖
Jai Shree Krishna🙏🙏🙏
The dialogues writer amd reader great