I am sorry but over analyzing this is just causing more stress. Lets just wait for investigations and build of the case! I do appreciate the info but over analysis paralysis is setting in!!! Lets just impeach her and get it over with!!
A threat is a threat, the crime intended to commit may or may not be happened considering that it is a mere threat. What is punishable does not depend on the happening of an event. What makes a threat punishable is the fact that you made a threat.
@@betyaableang ibig pong sabihin ng nulum poena sine lege, o no punishment for an act without a law that punishes it. Halos lahat po na gawaing mali ay may katapat na parusa pero may gawaing mali na wala sa batas. Halimbawa po, “freedom to believe.” Maling mali po ang paniniwalang walang Diyos na lumalang pero may mga taong naniniwala na walang Diyos dahil ayon sa kanila ang lahat daw ay nag exist sa pamamagitan ng big bang theory, ayon sa mga scientists na naniniwala sa big bang theory, nalalang ang mundo bilyong bilyon taon na ang nakakaraan dahil sa napakalaking pagsabog. Maraming tao ang hindi naniniwala sa Diyos dahil ang paniniwala nila ay lahat ay nalilkha dahil sa malakas na pagsabog. Tayong mga naniniwala na may Diyos na lumikha sa atin, yong paniniwalang yon ay maling mali, pero, dahil walang Batas na nagpaparusa na mali ang paniniwalang yon, hindi bawal ang pagiging Atheist. Very vague po ang comment niyo ma’am kung anong ibig niyong sabihin na there was once but cory repealed it in 1987. Can you cite that particular provision in the 1973 or 1935 constitution which was repealed in 1987. Yong “nulum poena sine lege” ay legal term po. Siguro yon po ang ibig niyong sabihin.
Unang una. The favt na nag hire sya ng tao na papatay sa pres, house speaker at 1st lady na walang basehan treath yn.... So kung ano pla manyare sa kanyanung president sisihin. Eh paano kung wala kinalaman ang presidente?
@@Choeychocoohuh??? Bulag ka ba?? Sino ba ang balakid sa plano nila na mag stay sa palasyo na 20 years part 2! Si VP sara kaya nga kating kati na si tamba mag VP at baguhin ang constitution nila! Na ready na ang bahay nang pangulo d b na renovate na nang bongga!!! Mag isip ka nga!!!
Treat to another life? I don't think so. There is no justification for threatening three lives. That capital murderer. Only Duterte supporters would try to find a justification in that diabolical Shi*
Pharmally P86B inobliga pa magfaceshield at pinahirapan huminga ang taongbayan noong Pandemic dahil gustong kumickback but of course kung DDS ka masarap sa pakirandam pag may suot na faceshield😀
Ang hina naman niyu, obligation to contract not yet committed, it is not a treat, it is an obligation to and not do, conditionally upon completion of one thing, gives rise for the other obligation to do.
From Research: Under Philippine law, the Vice President's action of publicly admitting to contracting a person to assassinate high-ranking officials, such as the President, the First Lady, and the Speaker of the House, can have serious criminal and civil implications. These include the following: Criminal Violations Inciting to Commit Crimes (Article 138, Revised Penal Code) By publicly announcing such a plan, the Vice President may be inciting others to commit grave offenses, such as murder. The act of incitement, especially if it influences or encourages others to act unlawfully, is a criminal offense. Proposal to Commit a Crime (Article 115, Revised Penal Code) If the Vice President has indeed contracted or proposed such an assassination, it constitutes a punishable offense. Any agreement to commit a crime like murder, even if not executed, is actionable. Grave Threats (Article 282, Revised Penal Code) The public statement constitutes a grave threat to the lives of the President, the First Lady, and the Speaker. This is a serious criminal offense, punishable by imprisonment. Conspiracy and Proposal to Commit Murder (Article 248 in relation to Article 8, Revised Penal Code) Contracting someone to assassinate is considered a conspiracy to commit murder, which is punishable under Philippine law. Even if the act has not been carried out, the conspiracy itself is a crime. Rebellion or Sedition (Article 139 and Article 142, Revised Penal Code) If the intent behind such threats is to destabilize the government or disrupt public order, it may qualify as sedition or rebellion, which are serious crimes. Violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act (RA 11479) If the threats are intended to sow fear or intimidate the government, they could fall under terrorism-related acts, which carry severe penalties. Civil Violations Civil Liability for Damages (Article 2176, Civil Code of the Philippines) The President, the First Lady, and the Speaker, or their families, may file a civil suit for moral and exemplary damages due to the emotional distress and harm caused by the public statements and threats. Abuse of Authority As a public official, the Vice President has a duty to uphold the law and maintain public confidence in the government. Such statements may be considered an abuse of her position, giving rise to administrative liabilities and a potential civil suit for damages to the government or the public. Political and Administrative Implications Impeachment The Vice President's action constitutes "betrayal of public trust" and "culpable violation of the Constitution", which are impeachable offenses under the Philippine Constitution. Ouster or Preventive Suspension The Vice President may face suspension or removal from office through administrative proceedings if deemed unfit to continue serving due to such declarations.
ang mga pinoy tuwang tuwa sa nangyayari na entertain sila kala mo nanonood ng sabong kanya kanya alaga... kaya hirap umasenso ang bansa.... bumoto na lang ng tama at wag magpabayad at maniwala sa mga tambay na bayaran ng mga politiko
That's your assumption Mr Andres. Your ideas are based on fiction and afterthoughts with malice😂😂😂 back to your basic jurisprudence, stop reading Robinhood and batman and Robin 😂😂😂
Hindi nmn niya direct sinabi na ,"I will kill you" para lang ang sabi niya " if you kil me ,ill kill you!😅ganern , wasting of time sa mga balitang ito 😅
ang main point may inutusan/pinagibilinan na siya na incase na may mangyari sakin, nakakasa na hindi na biro yan, presidente pinag uusapan dyan hindi kung sino sinong tao lang pagdating sa ganyan usapan kahit mabait o corrupt yung pinagbabantaan banta .,saka direkta niyang sinabi na pag namatay ako ipapapatay si bong bong, liza at romualdez kaya pasok na yan sa banta
sabog sabog na naman pinas ... investor staying away already... kawawang pilipinas... dapat dyan kay VP mag mayor na lang ... hindi pwede national position ...
Geez, Its not own interpretation. Her life is in danger since the Dutertes themselves say they have a lot of enemies and that's because of abusing the law and other criminal cases. She even has a video on TH-cam where she punched someone else and didn't look like self defense.
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
My deepest respect to hon jesse andres..very well said...kudos to DOJ community...
Karen Davila is just the worst
Different lawyers has different views.
*Beware of Chinese plot.*
Karen feeling smart 🤩
Filipinos need to call on China 🇨🇳 to *stop destabilizing* their country, by using the Duterte's,
and to follow international laws and order.
100% correct!
USA ..why china
Kumar get a job.
@@RenatoEscandalor
@@theinfralink6598
I am sorry but over analyzing this is just causing more stress. Lets just wait for investigations and build of the case! I do appreciate the info but over analysis paralysis is setting in!!! Lets just impeach her and get it over with!!
A threat is a threat, the crime intended to commit may or may not be happened considering that it is a mere threat. What is punishable does not depend on the happening of an event. What makes a threat punishable is the fact that you made a threat.
No crime if there is no law against it. There was once a law unfortunately Cory Aquino repeal it in 1987.
@@betyaableang ibig pong sabihin ng nulum poena sine lege, o no punishment for an act without a law that punishes it. Halos lahat po na gawaing mali ay may katapat na parusa pero may gawaing mali na wala sa batas. Halimbawa po, “freedom to believe.” Maling mali po ang paniniwalang walang Diyos na lumalang pero may mga taong naniniwala na walang Diyos dahil ayon sa kanila ang lahat daw ay nag exist sa pamamagitan ng big bang theory, ayon sa mga scientists na naniniwala sa big bang theory, nalalang ang mundo bilyong bilyon taon na ang nakakaraan dahil sa napakalaking pagsabog. Maraming tao ang hindi naniniwala sa Diyos dahil ang paniniwala nila ay lahat ay nalilkha dahil sa malakas na pagsabog. Tayong mga naniniwala na may Diyos na lumikha sa atin, yong paniniwalang yon ay maling mali, pero, dahil walang Batas na nagpaparusa na mali ang paniniwalang yon, hindi bawal ang pagiging Atheist.
Very vague po ang comment niyo ma’am kung anong ibig niyong sabihin na there was once but cory repealed it in 1987. Can you cite that particular provision in the 1973 or 1935 constitution which was repealed in 1987. Yong “nulum poena sine lege” ay legal term po. Siguro yon po ang ibig niyong sabihin.
even other world leaders declare conditional threat, its nothing new with VP Sarah's claim to be fair.
We have our own laws and rule. Actually you cannot say this shit in the US or Japan. They take death threats seriously.
@@jonconnor0729 so how come Putin, Trump, Netenyahu and Xi Jing Pin still around freely walking..
Unang una. The favt na nag hire sya ng tao na papatay sa pres, house speaker at 1st lady na walang basehan treath yn....
So kung ano pla manyare sa kanyanung president sisihin. Eh paano kung wala kinalaman ang presidente?
@@Choeychocoohuh??? Bulag ka ba?? Sino ba ang balakid sa plano nila na mag stay sa palasyo na 20 years part 2! Si VP sara kaya nga kating kati na si tamba mag VP at baguhin ang constitution nila! Na ready na ang bahay nang pangulo d b na renovate na nang bongga!!! Mag isip ka nga!!!
Treat to another life? I don't think so. There is no justification for threatening three lives. That capital murderer. Only Duterte supporters would try to find a justification in that diabolical Shi*
HOW IMBECILE ARE THE TUWAD COM??
I think 11 out of 10
Following the anchor woman's perspective, the proper agency would just file the approppriate charge, don't discuss the matter in media...
Gold - 129B
GSIS - 62.5B
SSS - 62B
LBP - 62B
DBP - 62B
PDICS - 117B
Philhealth - 89B
Flood control - 500B
ni President At ni Tambaluslos.
Vs
125M confidential funds - 70%cleared ni VP
So? Eh di kasuhan nyo after ng term, pero ngayun si Inday lustay muna 😂
GUSTO NILA MANATILI SA POSITION KAYA GANYAN ANG GINAGAWA NILA KAY INDAY SINISIRA NILA PERO HND SILA MAGTATAGUMPAY💚💚💚💚👊👊👊
Pharmally P86B inobliga pa magfaceshield at pinahirapan huminga ang taongbayan noong Pandemic dahil gustong kumickback but of course kung DDS ka masarap sa pakirandam pag may suot na faceshield😀
😂😂😂 madami ba kayu 😂😅@@onenonimous
@@Rayhanna123 anong madami pinagsasabi mo? Ikw ang troll bayaran ka!
People will be accountable; or she alone
File the case in court !!
She’s not a lawyer 😂
Oh my Lord have mercy on the people of the Philuppines if this is the calibre of intelligence .
Ang hina naman niyu, obligation to contract not yet committed, it is not a treat, it is an obligation to and not do, conditionally upon completion of one thing, gives rise for the other obligation to do.
Don’t act smart Karen 😂
*Kapag ipagpatuloy mo ang pag chi-chismis sa nanay ko, papatayin kita".. pag ganito po ba halimbawa lang, pasok ba sa conditional threat?!
How gain people
Huwag babagal bagal ang galaw...
.
From Research:
Under Philippine law, the Vice President's action of publicly admitting to contracting a person to assassinate high-ranking officials, such as the President, the First Lady, and the Speaker of the House, can have serious criminal and civil implications. These include the following:
Criminal Violations
Inciting to Commit Crimes (Article 138, Revised Penal Code)
By publicly announcing such a plan, the Vice President may be inciting others to commit grave offenses, such as murder. The act of incitement, especially if it influences or encourages others to act unlawfully, is a criminal offense.
Proposal to Commit a Crime (Article 115, Revised Penal Code)
If the Vice President has indeed contracted or proposed such an assassination, it constitutes a punishable offense. Any agreement to commit a crime like murder, even if not executed, is actionable.
Grave Threats (Article 282, Revised Penal Code)
The public statement constitutes a grave threat to the lives of the President, the First Lady, and the Speaker. This is a serious criminal offense, punishable by imprisonment.
Conspiracy and Proposal to Commit Murder (Article 248 in relation to Article 8, Revised Penal Code)
Contracting someone to assassinate is considered a conspiracy to commit murder, which is punishable under Philippine law. Even if the act has not been carried out, the conspiracy itself is a crime.
Rebellion or Sedition (Article 139 and Article 142, Revised Penal Code)
If the intent behind such threats is to destabilize the government or disrupt public order, it may qualify as sedition or rebellion, which are serious crimes.
Violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act (RA 11479)
If the threats are intended to sow fear or intimidate the government, they could fall under terrorism-related acts, which carry severe penalties.
Civil Violations
Civil Liability for Damages (Article 2176, Civil Code of the Philippines)
The President, the First Lady, and the Speaker, or their families, may file a civil suit for moral and exemplary damages due to the emotional distress and harm caused by the public statements and threats.
Abuse of Authority
As a public official, the Vice President has a duty to uphold the law and maintain public confidence in the government. Such statements may be considered an abuse of her position, giving rise to administrative liabilities and a potential civil suit for damages to the government or the public.
Political and Administrative Implications
Impeachment
The Vice President's action constitutes "betrayal of public trust" and "culpable violation of the Constitution", which are impeachable offenses under the Philippine Constitution.
Ouster or Preventive Suspension
The Vice President may face suspension or removal from office through administrative proceedings if deemed unfit to continue serving due to such declarations.
30 years journalist but still clueless 🤩😊
ang mga pinoy tuwang tuwa sa nangyayari na entertain sila kala mo nanonood ng sabong kanya kanya alaga... kaya hirap umasenso ang bansa.... bumoto na lang ng tama at wag magpabayad at maniwala sa mga tambay na bayaran ng mga politiko
U r putting the VP's life in danger, and how is that.?
ayyyy kaya pala mainstream media.... cge byeee.... 🤣🤣🤣
Joke only!
Wrongly interpret in my opinion.
That's your assumption Mr Andres. Your ideas are based on fiction and afterthoughts with malice😂😂😂 back to your basic jurisprudence, stop reading Robinhood and batman and Robin 😂😂😂
Kaw na magaling kung Hindi ka naniniwala
The law applies to all. That what we. Called indippendens & fredom. Thatat why we have our government yo implement law & order
Is the revenge from the grave a crime?? 😂
Hindi nmn niya direct sinabi na ,"I will kill you" para lang ang sabi niya " if you kil me ,ill kill you!😅ganern , wasting of time sa mga balitang ito 😅
ang main point may inutusan/pinagibilinan na siya na incase na may mangyari sakin, nakakasa na hindi na biro yan, presidente pinag uusapan dyan hindi kung sino sinong tao lang pagdating sa ganyan usapan kahit mabait o corrupt yung pinagbabantaan banta .,saka direkta niyang sinabi na pag namatay ako ipapapatay si bong bong, liza at romualdez kaya pasok na yan sa banta
"How can you have peace of mind if someone is threatening you"
How can u saythat?if you yourself has been attack and not get justice?
puck i day
Ano pinagsasabi nitong si Sara?
Lahat Ng mga ka dds manawagan tayo sa china
sabog sabog na naman pinas ... investor staying away already... kawawang pilipinas... dapat dyan kay VP mag mayor na lang ... hindi pwede national position ...
sisiinmo si bangag sila ang nauna
Impeach na Yan kinakahiya ko sya na VP maayos pa c Leny at least edukada umasta
Akala mo ikaw lang ang tao?
Olol.bangag ang.idol mo.adik ka.no. uhaw lng.yan sa cocaine.inom ka muna para mahimasmasan yong brain mo iha
Worst VP ever. Nabudol tayo ni Inday
di bangag ang dapat maipeach
Sabi mo
Daming nagmamarunong d2 klaro nmn na walang threat majority d naniniwala sa mga sinasabi ng mga nagmamarunong lang pabor sa kagustuhan nyo.
Ikaw nagmamarunong ka wala ka naman alam. Balik ka sa grade 1 loser.
Iyakan time
Thats ur own interpretation. What about the act of putting the VP's life is im danger. Its already a fact.
Geez, Its not own interpretation. Her life is in danger since the Dutertes themselves say they have a lot of enemies and that's because of abusing the law and other criminal cases. She even has a video on TH-cam where she punched someone else and didn't look like self defense.
We love And Trust Inday dahil sya ang kakampi ng mamamayang filipino
Wasting time
Mr andres pure and simple political harassment po yan,ibig sabihin nagmamagaling ka lang
Puro kayo interview wala kayong makuha na support sa admin ni bbm
e d arestohin nyo c sara wag na puro dakdak