Indeed, they've build up a fantastic resume. You can't be a serious film fan and not know of Criterion tremendous hard work for the film industry, and for providing; home cinema lovers a vast library of restored movies and thensome!
MGSBigBoss77 - Unless you say just watch the forgotten movies like a bootleg that aren’t constantly revoked by their copyright or you just don’t collect physical media anymore over just streaming & digitally tenting.
@@Ajourneyofknowing criterion collection has such high quality remasters...plus all the bonus features in the box...and the beautiful box art...plus most criterion movies are great! I love criterion sales !
Pretty pathetic justification of filling a market void. For profit. Remaster, what a disgusting term, given the word Master. Criterion is about encashing Hauntology and makes a lot of money doing so... Here we find zombies worshipping technology instead of the very content which is making them rich. Duh Criterion if the word has any relevance here...
It's inspiring to see so many young people passionate about restoring classic movies. I love cinema and I'd love to work at the Criterion someday, even as a janitor.
Glad to see effort being put into the box art. Movie posters, box art, any still image or printed material have become a forgotten art in regards to film.
I’ve been a Criterion collector since the mid-1980’s. If it did not exist, I have serious doubts that the major studios would have been inspired to include such special features as commentaries on their own discs. These guys were (and are) innovators in their field.
Each Criterion release needs to come with a behind the scenes of its restoration, please!! Too all at Criterion thank you. 👍And please think about including a behind the scene look of the restoration; Criterion is for Film fantastics, we love that kind of stuff. 🙂
Please know that "Foreign Correspondent" and "Saboteur" are two of my favorite Hitchcock movies. I was born in 1936 and so I love World War II movies. These are two "fringe-World War II movies." That umbrella scene ("Foreign Correspondent") when the prime minister is supposedly assassinated, that is classic, unforgettable Hitchcock. Later in that movie, the windmill scenes are classic Hitchcock. When the spy falls from the Statue of Liberty (Saboteur) is classic, unforgettable Hitchcock. To realize the relative innocence of movie-goers in the early 40's (pre-noir), you know how exciting these movies were for 40's audiences. I am so happy you are updating these two Hitchcock classics. Most people go for Hitch's big movies, but I love how these little characters operate in the Hitchcock universe. Same for "The Lady Vanishes" and "The 39 Steps," British Hitchcock!
Criterion do such important work. Their restoration jobs are stellar. Some of them are so good they look like contemporary releases. Thank you for preserving these works for us!
Criterion is the absolute best and they deserve your love and appreciation. My Criterion collection keeps growing and I expect it to continue to grow till I die. Thank you Criterion you absolutely beautiful people. Thanks for all the hard work and love.
I’ve often thought about how I would be able to watch some of the greatest films ever made without something like Criterion. The thought of a “lost” film tears me apart.
Honestly the fact that there are people complaining about FC getting a 2K restoration instead of 4K just goes to show how good we have it today. I'm only 23 and even I remember when DVD was as good as it got for home video. Folks older than me will remember when buying a Criterion edition meant getting a LaserDisc. To have access to these films in HD is already like a dream come true compared to how things were just over a decade ago; getting 4K restorations at all, even if Criterion doesn't have the time or resources to do it for every single movie (and it is a lot more expensive, especially in terms of storing those huge files), is something special I don't take for granted.
@Inge Fossen Yeah, but 7th Seal for the Bergman Set was scanned at 4K but printed in 1080, why? Remember, with 4K comes the possibility of HDR, Dolby Vision, DTS:X, and or Dolby Atmos. So don't buy the arguments that 4K is not noticeable. It is - when it is scanned, mastered, and printed to disc properly and with compatible technologies as well. As for the "look where we used to be" argument - we used to be I love Lucy in kinescope. It's 2019, not 1951. Desi Arnaz went to 35mm, kinescope was so bad. Time marches on.
@Inge Fossen Thank you for your considerate reply. But what you're saying still sounds eerily like what some people said when 8-track tapes went to cassette, when cassette went to CD, when VHS went to DVD, and when DVD went to Blu-ray. Of course, you need a player, but that's not a reason not to buy one. You need a 4K TV as well. I still have my old VHS player, but only for some family tapes. I went to DVD but not right away. Basically, I think most film fans rush to praise a film maker's "vision," but ignore that he/she is as much imprisoned by available technology as anyone. When you point that out some will claim it was a deliberate choice, but the PRINT of that film is as much a creative artifact as it is one person's vision. Look how VHS tapes fade to washout; Was that a vision? I think not. So upconverting film to the highest available format is always to be preferred since it encodes the highest amount of data about the master and therefore renders it more truthfully. You may feel uncomfortable referring to an Auteur's film as, "so much data" but it is in fact true. If you prefer film the way it was shot then that's a good argument for attending a Film Festival, but not for buying any kind of player of any format. Yes?You may disagree but I thank you, Inge! for making me think more about my ideas.
@Inge Fossen Mostly agree with you, my friend. I too have 4K player and 55" 4KTV( mine OLED). However I would quibble on one thing: 4K difference may not be very noticeable on our 55" TVs but the HDR, HDR10, Dolby Vision (as well as Dolby Atmos, DTS:X audio) is VERY noticeable. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think those are available on regular HD. They can make a HUGE difference in viewing. Also, as you admit, bigger TVs have more to gain from 4K, which in turn is an argument for it. Dolby Vision affects light as well as color, if I am correct. So it would be a very interesting experiment to take a bright, colorful Classic art house film like say, "Stalker" or "Ran" or "Lawrence of Arabia" (that one shot in 60 or 70mm, I think) and give it the full 4K Dolby Vision treatment and see what derives. It might be remarkable. I just re-watched Stalker on DVD recently and the light play that was clearly a strong emphasis in the film by Tarkovsky was superb. It's great that we can debate these questions compared to the pitiful choices we once had.
@@1cathexis You're absolutely right. There is a big difference between 2K and 4K. I work in films myself, I do this literally every day. And the idea of spending all this time and work in remastering an old film IN 2K and not 4K, is unbelievable. That means everything has to be redone when doing the 4K scan, which eventually will happen. What a waste.
"Honestly the fact that there are people complaining about FC getting a 2K restoration instead of 4K..." Yeah, especially since 4K is an obvious scam created by the electronics industry in order to take money from unsuspecting rubes. The human eye CANNOT DETECT ANYTHING BEYOND 1080p. Therefore, 4K is WORTHLESS.
You guys are some of the most important art restorers out there, I think, in terms of the fragility of the art (or its medium) and the vitality of the art form. Movies are going to be popular for the rest of forever, and now so many of these great classics are digitally restored in a "forever" format. Just watched Seven Samurai last Saturday, couldn't hold it together. So much fun, pathos, legendary characters, action that's mind-blowing. And a presentation that looks and sounds sooooo _good._
And here I was this whole time thinking the "Criterion Collection" was a special board made up of a bunch of old dudes sitting around in tuxedos sipping brandy and scotch, smoking big cigars, and slurping on caviar in a mansion at the end of Rodeo Drive. Didn't realize how "Nine Inch Nails" it actually is. Cheers.
@@chumcool unless you're talking about Trent and Atticus's workflow-- sitting at screens and goofing with instruments-- which is only marginally similar, I don't see how you'd compare the attitude of an industrial alt-rock outfit with a boutique DVD company.
All of these studios are doing such an amazing job . I recently acquired jaws in 4k uhd with Dolby atmos and was just completely blown away. It’s unbelievable what they are able to do these days as far as restoration goes . Amazing
I would LOVE to see these guys restore to 4K the WW2 Era Movie called The Best Years Of Our Lives. Plus EVERY Tarzan movie starting from Johnny Weismuller all the way down to Casper Van Dien.
The William Wyler masterpiece The Best Years Of Our Lives? Awesome film. They need to do another great of Wyler's too, Roman Holiday. Paramount haven't put t to BluRay so they need to permit Criterion to give it the sort of release it deserves.
Scott Luther - They don’t strictly need the original negatives (which is a blind shot if they even exist anymore) just something of a stable enough recording or copy to remaster itself.
The Criterion Channel is the greatest gift for young film buffs out there, it is THE best streaming service on the market by far. What an awesome company.
Incredibly necessary and makes me so happy that Criterion exists as a company. More than happy to pay good money for their top notch efforts rather than some dumpster bin, bare bones release with zero love put into it.
This is awesome! Been snapping up Criterion Collection releases since the laserdisc days (just bought the Pulp Fiction LD box a few weeks ago in fact). Great stuff.
I wonder if the grain of the original negatives limits whether 4K would bring out any more from it. I love the fact that the progress of computing allows such powerful restoration to take place and the irony is that we had to wait for the technology to allow us to see those old movies again in pristine condition
You guys are doing such important work, you are restoring our art, which is a huge part of our culture and history, so that future generations can see it. It saddens me very much how many things got lost to time. Our generation is the first to really see the importance of preservation and we are often just in time to restore classic works before it's too late. To think otherwise in a few decania many things of our life (or rather our grandparents' life in this case) would be lost to time is quite a scary thought. I'm very glad people like you guys exist to keep that from happening. Thank you!
For print design color reproduction and gamut is way more imortant than size. Also, most of the things he will do would be in portrait orientation so aspect ration doesn't matter and it was shot in 2014
The folks at Criterion are simply the best. AHHHH This makes me so happy. I already had a great deal of appreciation for the amount of work they put into each and every one of their releases, but seeing this adds so much to that. I hope they stick around for a long time. I also wish they'd do a release of Klimov's "Come and See," but I won't be pushy.
Your dedication is greatly appreciated. I've seen several of your 'remastered' movies, including Foreign Correspondent, and the quality is amazing. I feel that when we see these movies now we are seeing them looking better than the original audiences! The cream in my collection is your BLU RAY of WAR AND PEACE (Russia c1967)!!!
Some years ago, I bought Criterion's, "The Friends of Eddie Coyle" at Barnes & Noble. Truly enjoyed this movie and all the work Criterion did to get this DVD on the market.
The only downside to this was seeing how going from 2 to 8 days scanning time was all it took to make the decision to restore in 2K rather than 4K. Perhaps the difference would be negligible, or they had access to the film for a limited time, but spending an extra 6 days then to have the film in 4K now and forever seems like it would have been very worth it.
I wish more people had this kind of love and passion for our media culture. Most of the time it seems like it’s mostly people in their 20’s-50’s who care enough to try. I’m no movie restorer myself but even I think film is something that needs to be preserved just like sculptures, paintings, books and monuments since they represent our history and culture to give the future a look at what life was like before.
love these guys! this label is truly revolutionary in film preservation. I find it fascinating that Criterion has been around (officially) since the early 80s. I actually have a few titles on Laserdisc!
I noticed that they're using a first generation vanilla Macbook (2006) and at least one G5 (phased out in 2005)... workhorse machines that, if you trick them out, work really well for A/V editing.
I have the 1921 Charlie Chaplin movie The Kid on Blu-ray from Criterion. When the opening scene appeared I was stunned at the picture quality of a 100 year old film. It looks like it was made yesterday. 1925's The Freshman with Harrold Lloyd also looks great. Anyone looking for a silent film should start here.
Shitty Productions Criterion would be able to do a far better job. The 4K version of Star Wars Online is a fan made version. It’s seriously impressive, but even the guys admit that they are limited by their knowledge and resources.
They should just do an 8k transfer now to save themselves the time, like the Wizard of OZ got. They can go and release a compressed 4k version now, and wait until 8k is more popular to double dip.
Many of these titles would be rotting away in some storage rooms, but thanks to Criterion, we can see them again fully restored. These major studios don't seem to care about preserving these lost gems..
I have a newly found appreciation for Criterion after watching this. I actually have “Foreign Correspondent” from them and thought is looked awesome, now I know what went into it! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Recently I watched the Criterion edition of Alfred Hitchcocks movie "Young and Innocent" (GB, 1937) and it was amazing. I strongly recommend the Criterion editions of Hitchcock's movies.
I hope that one day, Toho will work with Criterion a bit more and hopefully we can get an upgrade to Spine 1000 and maybe even more Godzilla Box Sets from Criterion
Not just the technology, but the care and attention used when working with it. That's what makes Criterion stand out from the pack. There are, sad to say, still some substandard restorations being released - messed up colour balance, artifacting etc, even on 4K discs.
For a long time I have been a big fan of what CC has been doing. I love their respect for movies! I wonder what their "time crunch" was? Seems a pity to not sacrifice 1 week to do a full 4K scan (especially as now 4k is becoming so commonplace). They "waited" 80 years to restore this - what's few extra days?
Why not do it in 4k? I don't get it. Just wait a few more days and do an ultimate version. Right now it will have to be rescanned again in a few years time.
+Jurij Fedorov I imagine they could be on loan from the National Archives and have a time in which they have to return it. Or it could be a limited amount of equipment.
at the end of the day, the film's going to be scaled back down to 1080 so there's really no point doing it in 4k unless you want to see all the pores of the actor's skin or very fine details of stuff
There have been a few times when I would like to look at something on the screen up close even though I usually watch it from a distance and wouldn't notice the difference.
He said a time crunch, so I would agree with Bryce in that it was on loan from the Archives. They do often do 4k restorations, but I imagine it's not possible to do it every time.
I absolutely love what they do over at Criterion. My only complaint is that in recent years they have put out very, very few old Hollywood classics. I’m by no means saying that they should focus on American movies, but I wish they would do more of them. These last couple of years, I have shifted my focus to Warner Archive Collection instead. I picked up a total of three (3) Criterion titles in 2020. I would have liked it to have been a lot more.
As a young person I'm glad I can experience classic films thanks to Criterion. What a fantastic label.
Indeed, they've build up a fantastic resume. You can't be a serious film fan and not know of Criterion tremendous hard work for the film industry, and for providing; home cinema lovers a vast library of restored movies and thensome!
You look 50.......
MGSBigBoss77 - Unless you say just watch the forgotten movies like a bootleg that aren’t constantly revoked by their copyright or you just don’t collect physical media anymore over just streaming & digitally tenting.
@@Ajourneyofknowing criterion collection has such high quality remasters...plus all the bonus features in the box...and the beautiful box art...plus most criterion movies are great!
I love criterion sales !
Pretty pathetic justification of filling a market void. For profit. Remaster, what a disgusting term, given the word Master. Criterion is about encashing Hauntology and makes a lot of money doing so... Here we find zombies worshipping technology instead of the very content which is making them rich. Duh Criterion if the word has any relevance here...
I want to thank this company very much..these people are doing things that are not only worth doing, but also very necessary for our generation.
Sayantan Dutta yeah
N
Amen
I have to agree. The next generation needs to see movies with better qualitys.
ENOUGH SAID
Criterion is carrying the DVD / Blu Ray industry right now. So thankful for them, and their preservation of avant-garde / foreign films
It's inspiring to see so many young people passionate about restoring classic movies. I love cinema and I'd love to work at the Criterion someday, even as a janitor.
I am glad they talked about the covers. I simply love criterions box art.
Glad to see effort being put into the box art.
Movie posters, box art, any still image or printed material have become a forgotten art in regards to film.
I’ve been a Criterion collector since the mid-1980’s. If it did not exist, I have serious doubts that the major studios would have been inspired to include such special features as commentaries on their own discs. These guys were (and are) innovators in their field.
Each Criterion release needs to come with a behind the scenes of its restoration, please!! Too all at Criterion thank you. 👍And please think about including a behind the scene look of the restoration; Criterion is for Film fantastics, we love that kind of stuff. 🙂
I'm big fan of what people at Criterion do. Would love to work for them some time in my career.
Please know that "Foreign Correspondent" and "Saboteur" are two of my favorite Hitchcock movies.
I was born in 1936 and so I love World War II movies. These are two "fringe-World War II movies."
That umbrella scene ("Foreign Correspondent") when the prime minister is supposedly assassinated, that is classic, unforgettable Hitchcock.
Later in that movie, the windmill scenes are classic Hitchcock.
When the spy falls from the Statue of Liberty (Saboteur) is classic, unforgettable Hitchcock.
To realize the relative innocence of movie-goers in the early 40's (pre-noir), you know how exciting these movies were for 40's audiences.
I am so happy you are updating these two Hitchcock classics.
Most people go for Hitch's big movies, but I love how these little characters operate in the Hitchcock universe.
Same for "The Lady Vanishes" and "The 39 Steps," British Hitchcock!
Criterion do such important work. Their restoration jobs are stellar. Some of them are so good they look like contemporary releases. Thank you for preserving these works for us!
Criterion is the absolute best and they deserve your love and appreciation. My Criterion collection keeps growing and I expect it to continue to grow till I die. Thank you Criterion you absolutely beautiful people. Thanks for all the hard work and love.
I’ve often thought about how I would be able to watch some of the greatest films ever made without something like Criterion. The thought of a “lost” film tears me apart.
This is awesome, the Criterion Channel has been such a nice break away from the typical streaming platforms. Thank you!
Honestly the fact that there are people complaining about FC getting a 2K restoration instead of 4K just goes to show how good we have it today.
I'm only 23 and even I remember when DVD was as good as it got for home video. Folks older than me will remember when buying a Criterion edition meant getting a LaserDisc. To have access to these films in HD is already like a dream come true compared to how things were just over a decade ago; getting 4K restorations at all, even if Criterion doesn't have the time or resources to do it for every single movie (and it is a lot more expensive, especially in terms of storing those huge files), is something special I don't take for granted.
@Inge Fossen Yeah, but 7th Seal for the Bergman Set was scanned at 4K but printed in 1080, why? Remember, with 4K comes the possibility of HDR, Dolby Vision, DTS:X, and or Dolby Atmos. So don't buy the arguments that 4K is not noticeable. It is - when it is scanned, mastered, and printed to disc properly and with compatible technologies as well. As for the "look where we used to be" argument - we used to be I love Lucy in kinescope. It's 2019, not 1951. Desi Arnaz went to 35mm, kinescope was so bad. Time marches on.
@Inge Fossen Thank you for your considerate reply. But what you're saying still sounds eerily like what some people said when 8-track tapes went to cassette, when cassette went to CD, when VHS went to DVD, and when DVD went to Blu-ray. Of course, you need a player, but that's not a reason not to buy one. You need a 4K TV as well. I still have my old VHS player, but only for some family tapes. I went to DVD but not right away. Basically, I think most film fans rush to praise a film maker's "vision," but ignore that he/she is as much imprisoned by available technology as anyone. When you point that out some will claim it was a deliberate choice, but the PRINT of that film is as much a creative artifact as it is one person's vision. Look how VHS tapes fade to washout; Was that a vision? I think not. So upconverting film to the highest available format is always to be preferred since it encodes the highest amount of data about the master and therefore renders it more truthfully. You may feel uncomfortable referring to an Auteur's film as, "so much data" but it is in fact true. If you prefer film the way it was shot then that's a good argument for attending a Film Festival, but not for buying any kind of player of any format. Yes?You may disagree but I thank you, Inge! for making me think more about my ideas.
@Inge Fossen Mostly agree with you, my friend. I too have 4K player and 55" 4KTV( mine OLED). However I would quibble on one thing: 4K difference may not be very noticeable on our 55" TVs but the HDR, HDR10, Dolby Vision (as well as Dolby Atmos, DTS:X audio) is VERY noticeable. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think those are available on regular HD. They can make a HUGE difference in viewing. Also, as you admit, bigger TVs have more to gain from 4K, which in turn is an argument for it. Dolby Vision affects light as well as color, if I am correct. So it would be a very interesting experiment to take a bright, colorful Classic art house film like say, "Stalker" or "Ran" or "Lawrence of Arabia" (that one shot in 60 or 70mm, I think) and give it the full 4K Dolby Vision treatment and see what derives. It might be remarkable. I just re-watched Stalker on DVD recently and the light play that was clearly a strong emphasis in the film by Tarkovsky was superb. It's great that we can debate these questions compared to the pitiful choices we once had.
@@1cathexis You're absolutely right. There is a big difference between 2K and 4K. I work in films myself, I do this literally every day. And the idea of spending all this time and work in remastering an old film IN 2K and not 4K, is unbelievable. That means everything has to be redone when doing the 4K scan, which eventually will happen. What a waste.
"Honestly the fact that there are people complaining about FC getting a 2K restoration instead of 4K..."
Yeah, especially since 4K is an obvious scam created by the electronics industry in order to take money from unsuspecting rubes. The human eye CANNOT DETECT ANYTHING BEYOND 1080p. Therefore, 4K is WORTHLESS.
You guys are some of the most important art restorers out there, I think, in terms of the fragility of the art (or its medium) and the vitality of the art form. Movies are going to be popular for the rest of forever, and now so many of these great classics are digitally restored in a "forever" format. Just watched Seven Samurai last Saturday, couldn't hold it together. So much fun, pathos, legendary characters, action that's mind-blowing. And a presentation that looks and sounds sooooo _good._
And here I was this whole time thinking the "Criterion Collection" was a special board made up of a bunch of old dudes sitting around in tuxedos sipping brandy and scotch, smoking big cigars, and slurping on caviar in a mansion at the end of Rodeo Drive. Didn't realize how "Nine Inch Nails" it actually is. Cheers.
A. "Nine Inch Nails" might be pushing it, lol.
B. "Nine Inch Nails" are now old dudes in mansions who are so over it they don't even drink.
@@mnkykungfu If you don’t get it you never will.
@@chumcool I don't think anyone gets it, dude
@@luckygitane Well... I guess I’m in the shallow end of the TH-cam pool again.
@@chumcool unless you're talking about Trent and Atticus's workflow-- sitting at screens and goofing with instruments-- which is only marginally similar, I don't see how you'd compare the attitude of an industrial alt-rock outfit with a boutique DVD company.
These are the cleanest desks I've ever seen.
I'm guessing they cleaned things up a bit for this video
Those people are doing an amazing job!
These guys are doing wonders for the art of cinema.
Is incredible. I'm really grateful Criterion exists because there is a REAL restoration of a lot of films with a really messed up quality.
Many, many thanks for what you are doing. Many of these films are classic that deserve to be presented in the best possible format.
I love old classic movies!! So glad they are being preserved
All of these studios are doing such an amazing job . I recently acquired jaws in 4k uhd with Dolby atmos and was just completely blown away. It’s unbelievable what they are able to do these days as far as restoration goes . Amazing
I would LOVE to see these guys restore to 4K the WW2 Era Movie called The Best Years Of Our Lives. Plus EVERY Tarzan movie starting from Johnny Weismuller all the way down to Casper Van Dien.
The William Wyler masterpiece The Best Years Of Our Lives? Awesome film. They need to do another great of Wyler's too, Roman Holiday. Paramount haven't put t to BluRay so they need to permit Criterion to give it the sort of release it deserves.
Scott Luther - They don’t strictly need the original negatives (which is a blind shot if they even exist anymore) just something of a stable enough recording or copy to remaster itself.
The Apu Trilogy is probably the biggest achievement in film restoration currently, pretty incredible
The Criterion Channel is the greatest gift for young film buffs out there, it is THE best streaming service on the market by far. What an awesome company.
Big fan of the Criterion Collection. Thank you for what you do, and giving the public a glimpse of your artististry.
Incredibly necessary and makes me so happy that Criterion exists as a company.
More than happy to pay good money for their top notch efforts rather than some dumpster bin, bare bones release with zero love put into it.
I discovered a lot of new favorites and hidden gems from Criterion. Always thankful.
This is awesome! Been snapping up Criterion Collection releases since the laserdisc days (just bought the Pulp Fiction LD box a few weeks ago in fact). Great stuff.
Thank you Criterion for all you do. Amazing team effort.
I wonder if the grain of the original negatives limits whether 4K would bring out any more from it. I love the fact that the progress of computing allows such powerful restoration to take place and the irony is that we had to wait for the technology to allow us to see those old movies again in pristine condition
I discovered Criterion Collection in the 1990s laser discs and have been hooked on ever since. I am glad that they have become so popular now.
Thank you all for your great work! So many classic gems beautifully presented.
Great job you are doing Criterion
You are serving the humanity after restoring lot of gems as classics
Bravo
Long live cinema
Love you
Wow , this is soooo cool. Can't stop smiling. Thank you criterion for the amazing work you do
Never knew how drastic the changes were before that before and after. Incredible work being done by them
You guys are doing such important work, you are restoring our art, which is a huge part of our culture and history, so that future generations can see it. It saddens me very much how many things got lost to time. Our generation is the first to really see the importance of preservation and we are often just in time to restore classic works before it's too late. To think otherwise in a few decania many things of our life (or rather our grandparents' life in this case) would be lost to time is quite a scary thought. I'm very glad people like you guys exist to keep that from happening. Thank you!
Amazing video! I love learning about film restoration and the Criterion team do an incredible work!
I really appreciate the serious work Criterion have been putting up.
Strange how the art director has the smallest monitor of anyone...
For print design color reproduction and gamut is way more imortant than size. Also, most of the things he will do would be in portrait orientation so aspect ration doesn't matter and it was shot in 2014
My experience with Criterion releases is small, but purely positive.
This company is a nearly priceless asset to the movie industry.
Thanks very much. It is always nice to see what the processes look like. Not that we understand all this--
Thanks Criterion Collection for restoring all of this masterpieces
The folks at Criterion are simply the best. AHHHH This makes me so happy. I already had a great deal of appreciation for the amount of work they put into each and every one of their releases, but seeing this adds so much to that. I hope they stick around for a long time. I also wish they'd do a release of Klimov's "Come and See," but I won't be pushy.
Always great to see the folks at work and know the dedication. So much Bad re-dos out there too, but Criterion is the Reel Deal.
Your dedication is greatly appreciated. I've seen several of your 'remastered' movies, including Foreign Correspondent, and the quality is amazing. I feel that when we see these movies now we are seeing them looking better than the original audiences! The cream in my collection is your BLU RAY of WAR AND PEACE (Russia c1967)!!!
Thank you guys, you are true cinema lovers.
Wow, just amazing. This is god's work. The cinema is my Church.
Awesome! Thank you all for doing this!!!!!!!
You do a great service for cinema. Thanks so much.
My life would be much worse without the great work that Criterion does. Here's to many more years!
Foreign Correspondent has some stellar suspense sequences, so I’m happy I watched it on Criterion for the first time
Some years ago, I bought Criterion's, "The Friends of Eddie Coyle" at Barnes & Noble. Truly enjoyed this movie and all the work Criterion did to get this DVD on the market.
The only downside to this was seeing how going from 2 to 8 days scanning time was all it took to make the decision to restore in 2K rather than 4K.
Perhaps the difference would be negligible, or they had access to the film for a limited time, but spending an extra 6 days then to have the film in 4K now and forever seems like it would have been very worth it.
He said they were under a time crunch, so yes probably only had access to the film for a few days.
Important work, and highly entertaining as well!
I wish more people had this kind of love and passion for our media culture. Most of the time it seems like it’s mostly people in their 20’s-50’s who care enough to try. I’m no movie restorer myself but even I think film is something that needs to be preserved just like sculptures, paintings, books and monuments since they represent our history and culture to give the future a look at what life was like before.
Thanks for your hard work
love these guys! this label is truly revolutionary in film preservation. I find it fascinating that Criterion has been around (officially) since the early 80s. I actually have a few titles on Laserdisc!
The guy talking at 0:12 reminds me of Peter Stormare
Just got my godzilla criterion collection I'm so happy I finally get to watch all the legendary films even if one of them is not that good
thank you criterion collection for your fantastic work!!!
you are a true gift for film afficionados like me 😭
Thank you so much for saving our history.
This is pretty awesome, not gonna lie. Thank you for making this! ❤️
I noticed that they're using a first generation vanilla Macbook (2006) and at least one G5 (phased out in 2005)... workhorse machines that, if you trick them out, work really well for A/V editing.
Thank you Criterion for restoring Elaine May's Mikey and Nicky (1976). Easily one of the most underrated films I've ever seen.
I have the 1921 Charlie Chaplin movie The Kid on Blu-ray from Criterion. When the opening scene appeared I was stunned at the picture quality of a 100 year old film. It looks like it was made yesterday. 1925's The Freshman with Harrold Lloyd also looks great. Anyone looking for a silent film should start here.
Criterion made films available that I never thought I would get the chance to see. They do an amazing job!
This whole process is a pice of art. Wow. This is fantastic! Thank you for preserving our human art history so well!
The remaster of Tati's 'Trafic' is astounding. The best car movie ever made.
Love their restorations, I always look to see if the film is part of the Criterion Collection if I'm buy it for my own collection.
Thanks for this great look into Criterion.
I’d like to see more on the audio stuff. That’s kind of cool how they may mix a track that’s really only mono or stereo
If only we could get the original star wars to these guys.
Shitty Productions
Criterion would be able to do a far better job. The 4K version of Star Wars Online is a fan made version. It’s seriously impressive, but even the guys admit that they are limited by their knowledge and resources.
They should just do an 8k transfer now to save themselves the time, like the Wizard of OZ got. They can go and release a compressed 4k version now, and wait until 8k is more popular to double dip.
@@spookylemon4947 the quest is, will it be the unaltered versions of the OG trilogy or the special editions though?
Lucas keeps fiddling with it.
OH GOD YES PLEASE.
Many of these titles would be rotting away in some storage rooms, but thanks to Criterion, we can see them again fully restored.
These major studios don't seem to care about preserving these lost gems..
ALL of James Cagney's movies are at the Library of Congress, PLEASE restore them.
Film Restoration - CLEAN DESK , Sound Restoration - CLEAN DESK, Art Department - YAY !! Desk looks like mine - Creative people RULE the Earth !
These guys are my heroes!
Wonderful work
I believe that supporting the film restoration process also involves allowing the power of High Definition to give the best experience possible
I have a newly found appreciation for Criterion after watching this. I actually have “Foreign Correspondent” from them and thought is looked awesome, now I know what went into it! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Recently I watched the Criterion edition of Alfred Hitchcocks movie "Young and Innocent" (GB, 1937) and it was amazing. I strongly recommend the Criterion editions of Hitchcock's movies.
Thx for releasing Fantastic Planet!
I hope that one day, Toho will work with Criterion a bit more and hopefully we can get an upgrade to Spine 1000 and maybe even more Godzilla Box Sets from Criterion
Damn! I may be easily impressed, but this blows my mind!
The fact that you can remove scratches on a film negative show how far technology has come.
Criterion, you do great work. Don't let anyone say otherwise :)
The people behind the magic, big respect 👌🏼
Great stuff, just goes to show what wonders today's technology can do.
Lol 4 years ago
@@luciano_luna1941 as was his comment
Not just the technology, but the care and attention used when working with it. That's what makes Criterion stand out from the pack. There are, sad to say, still some substandard restorations being released - messed up colour balance, artifacting etc, even on 4K discs.
For a long time I have been a big fan of what CC has been doing. I love their respect for movies! I wonder what their "time crunch" was? Seems a pity to not sacrifice 1 week to do a full 4K scan (especially as now 4k is becoming so commonplace). They "waited" 80 years to restore this - what's few extra days?
Probably had to give the film back.
WOW! WHAT COOL JOBS YOU GUYS HAVE!
I didn't know about the art/design department and the role they had in making covers. Very cool
This is sooooo fucking interesting!!!
The covers are really cool , astonishing.
Fascinating! Thank you
Movies that need to be on 4K: Gangs of New York, No Country for Old Men, Carlitos Way, Lawless, Open Range.
Why not do it in 4k? I don't get it. Just wait a few more days and do an ultimate version. Right now it will have to be rescanned again in a few years time.
+Jurij Fedorov I'd say it depends on the filmed used. Maybe that makes it worth their time or not.
+Jurij Fedorov I imagine they could be on loan from the National Archives and have a time in which they have to return it. Or it could be a limited amount of equipment.
at the end of the day, the film's going to be scaled back down to 1080 so there's really no point doing it in 4k unless you want to see all the pores of the actor's skin or very fine details of stuff
There have been a few times when I would like to look at something on the screen up close even though I usually watch it from a distance and wouldn't notice the difference.
He said a time crunch, so I would agree with Bryce in that it was on loan from the Archives. They do often do 4k restorations, but I imagine it's not possible to do it every time.
I absolutely love what they do over at Criterion. My only complaint is that in recent years they have put out very, very few old Hollywood classics. I’m by no means saying that they should focus on American movies, but I wish they would do more of them. These last couple of years, I have shifted my focus to Warner Archive Collection instead. I picked up a total of three (3) Criterion titles in 2020. I would have liked it to have been a lot more.
If you work at Criterion Company:
We love you, keep going.
My boyfriend sent me this and this is very interesting thank you for sharing. You are doing cool work that i didn’t know existed.