The Most Hated Artist | MoistCr1Tikal
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ย. 2021
- Thomas Kinkade was an American painter who was known for his works featuring idyllic landscapes, cottages, and country churches. He gained popularity in the 1990s and early 2000s, and at one point, his artwork was reportedly in one out of every 20 American homes. However, Kinkade's artwork was also heavily criticized by some art critics and professionals, and he became a controversial figure in the art world.
One reason for the dislike of Kinkade's artwork was the perception that it was overly sentimental and commercialized. Kinkade's paintings often depicted idealized, pastoral scenes with glowing windows and luminous sunsets, which some critics felt were formulaic and mass-produced. His art was also often reproduced on a variety of consumer goods, such as calendars, mugs, and puzzles, which led some to argue that Kinkade was more interested in selling a brand than creating art.
Another criticism of Kinkade's work was that it lacked depth and artistic merit. Some art critics argued that Kinkade's paintings lacked the complexity and intellectual rigor of great art, and that his style was derivative of earlier painters such as Maxfield Parrish and Norman Rockwell. Kinkade himself once referred to his work as "narrative impressionism," but critics often felt that his paintings were more illustrative than truly impressionistic.
In addition to these criticisms of his art, Kinkade was also the subject of controversy due to his personal life. He had a well-publicized battle with alcoholism and was arrested for DUI in 2010. He was also accused of behaving inappropriately towards women who worked for him, including harassment and making unwanted advances.
Overall, while Thomas Kinkade's artwork was immensely popular with a wide audience, it was also heavily criticized by some for being overly sentimental and commercialized, lacking depth and artistic merit, and for the controversies surrounding Kinkade's personal life.
Original Video - • The Most Hated Artist ...
Music Used:
Silent Hill 2 - fermata in mistic air
Com Truise - Chemical Legs
Tchaikovsky's Waltz of the Flowers
Kevin Macleod - Airship Serenity
Aphex Twin
Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License Website - ✨Join the Moist Moments community and show your support by buying us a coffee at www.buymeacoffee.com/moistmom... ☕️ Thank You!
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "Penguinz0 Reacts to Dark Web Predator"
• Penguinz0 Reacts to Ca...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~ 🌟Level up your TH-cam channel using TubeBuddy! 🌟
If you’re looking to take your TH-cam channel to the next level, I highly recommend checking out TubeBuddy. It’s a tool I use daily to optimize my videos, get keyword suggestions, and so much more!
👉 Get TubeBuddy here: www.tubebuddy.com/pricing?a=M...
By signing up through my link, you not only get access to amazing features that will help grow your channel but also support me in bringing more fantastic content to you!
I cannot stress enough how much of a game-changer TubeBuddy has been for me, and I have no doubt it can have the same impact on you. Check it out and let me know what you think!
🔗 Don’t forget to use my link to get started and enjoy all the premium features that will help boost your channel’s performance! - บันเทิง
Video resumes at 6:32 Sorry about that.
No no ur fine u gave us authenticity by having a mini live stream 🤣
When ya gotta go , ya gotta go lol
Iss oke
There’s an odd error in the hosted video at 3:18 where he narrates “Thomas kinkaid was born in 1985” and I was like no fucking way lol I googled it, it’s 1958, which fits way better. Just a funny error I thought I’d point out. (Not Charlie’s error, whoever’s video this is he’s watching)
Nah bro, I'm watching the whole damn video
Working on a painting, listening to Charlie in the background
Charlie: "Artists Suck"
Arist: you can't tell us what art is! It'd subjective and emotional
Also artist: THIS ISNT ART
I mean, it's also artists who shit on nfts (as they should)
@@BloodyCanoness Until they make an nft of their own art, and then suddenly it's the future of art.
Repressive tolerance, it’s a leftist specialty 👌
@@xal7034 fr
@@BloodyCanoness agreed
Jackson pollocks art isn’t even his own idea. It comes from his wife who was abused by him. And he stole her art style which caused her to go to the opposite end of the art spectrum
That I did not know
@Shaggy13 714 abstract
Janet Sobel wasn't his wife but she did invent the drip style of painting. It can be argued that painting styles can't "really" be stolen though, otherwise we'd all be guilty. Pollock was a terrible human being but he was still an artist.
That dude is a d!€k
Did he "steal" it? What I've read is that she was a huge influence on him, but that this was because she chose to help him figure out what he wanted to do.
Nothing against modern art, but I love the “kitsch” style. Not everything has to be deep. There’s nothing wrong with enjoying something just because it makes you feel good and looks nice. But I agree Kinkade was an unlikeable person. I think ALL artists & critics need to stop taking themselves so seriously and getting angry when people don’t like or understand their preferred style. The beauty of art is how subjective it is.
I agree as an artist and an artist who does more abstract and expressionism work with heavy meanings and sometimes the simple nature of his work is an art in its self! I’ve sat down with a couple puzzles of his paintings and the beauty is just refreshing to see his pretty worlds sometimes
“simple” as in lack of deep meanings
I thought Kitsch was more like trying pretend your paintings have a deeper meaning when it’s actually hollow
@@ashgoat4792 it's a fuckin picture, pretending there is some deep meaning behind it is just pretentious
@@Luminaria999 fr sometimes when i paint for my art class I have to come up with meanings after i paint. not everything needs to have meaning
So basically the only people who really hated him were fine art snobs who were upset at how accessible and widespread fine art became
Or people that had an art degree yet never painted a single piece of art, and got mad that he was successful.
or the people who he manipulated into funding his art by appealing to their religious beliefs
@@notamanstudios4408 if people want to support an artist that paints things that have to do with religion, and he makes paintings that have to do with religion, that is not manipulation, that is called getting what you paid for.
@@gabrielschneider7087
Even so you don't need an excuse to fund someone.
It can be as simple as "I just like them".
so basically the point of the video was that both sides of the art community have the exact same stick up their ass about “real art” so you missed the entire point
Modern Artists: "You made your art based on Positive emotions, and influenced by religion? That's horrible. You're no real artist."
Renaissance artists:
Well that shit is incredibly boring. Going to an art museum and just looking at classical paintings is just mind numbing. There’s zero interpretation with many of them.
@@BIGBoy-pp4db not every painting needs to be interpreted in various ways
@@BIGBoy-pp4db personally loved seeing classical paintings at some of the museums i visited in paris, especially the sheer size of some of these, they were so intensly detailed and like the size of a movie theater screen. there was a lot of variety, sometimes i just want to see pretty pictures, i go watch art to clear my mind for a bit and get some creative inspiration, not to overthink on the meaning of what i'm looking at
@@BIGBoy-pp4db yeah cause a couple of squares and a plant leaves a lot to interpretation.
@@BIGBoy-pp4db the point isn't your interpretation, it's the artists message. The artists of the Renaissance valued their individuality and put it on display for others to see, rather than making art that gives an observer the opportunity to ruminate on their own thoughts and stroke their own ego.
The worst part of art is how people think that there's a 'right way' to do it. Art is a thing that was made beyond a purpose of pure function.
If you make a hammer and you put an inscription on it, it's art now. Crown molding is art too. Most things have artistic elements and are by extension art.
I actually like weird and experimental modern art, mainly sculptures. But the thing is that the creators of it take it WAY too seriously. You don't need some 'deep philosophical' reason why you made something really weird.
I think the reason why they get into deep philosophical reasons (aside from ego) is because a lot of abstract art comes from the principle of "how can I express emotion and meaning through the most unusual way possible?" And well, this question by itself already starts to get pretty philosophical, so you can see where the rest goes hopefully.
I always believed ugly art is a waste. It’s like, if you have something to say, then just say it, because typically the people who agree with the artist are the only ones who will understand and it’s no use preaching to the choir, so to speak.
@@majorproblem8796 the problem with that is how little reach the average person has with just speaking. That’s why they go through the whole route of creating that art has holds a message because that way a message that means a lot to them is immortalized into art.
i enjoy the deeper meaning because that's how i get the enjoyment out of a lot of it. at my art museum there's a piece of art that's just two light bulbs on a wire together and i thought "ok this is stupid" until i read the plaque next to it about how it related to the artist and their partner who got aids and it moved me a lot and now i appreciate it
I went to art school with someone who asked herself "how far can you dissect a painting until it's no longer a painting?", and what she would do was dismantle the canvas and the frame, and pour various colors of leftover paints from hardware stores onto plastic until they dried, and make all these crazy sculptural set ups with them. they never got SUPER big, since she was a student and had to balance other classes, plus she was an athlete so she had that responsibility too, but what she did create was really interesting and I think if she had a little more time, she could have created all sorts of crazy environments and installations for people to walk through.
she definitely changed how I define paintings. and on top of that, she was one of the brightest, kindest souls I'd ever met. a true pleasure to be around. and bc of that, because of that humility and kindness and gift with people, she got everyone else in the class excited about her work and her perspective. we got to see a whole new angle of a concept we all thought we already understood, and that would have NEVER been possible had she been elitist and stuck up and gatekeepy, the way so many others are.
artists who act like their work is some pinnacle of philosophy do such a disservice to themselves, their work, the art world, and the people they could reach with their talent. art is a dialogue, and the more people you leave out of the conversation, the smaller and grayer the world becomes.
Honestly I enjoy the abstract and the concrete style of art. And you can call someone’s style garish without being utterly insufferable
i really respect ugly art
Something can be abstract without being utterly lazy and uninspiring.
There's a difference between abstract, like Picasso, and just someone literally having diarrhea on a piece of canvas and dropping another water balloon of red paint on top of it.
@@puddycat2325 The original poster never said anything to the contrary, did you just post this comment to be obnoxious or were you actually trying to make a point?
@@cogahan3105 To you, I'm sure there is. That's why there's many different styles of art, enough for all kinds of people to enjoy what they like.
I personally really like these paintings. Even if they're a bit cheesy, the warm fuzzy feelings they give me are good enough for me.
There is absolutely nothing cheesy about sentimental cottages. A lot of people in art communities are cynical degenerates.
i mean personally, realism is easier for me just because im not as creative, id rather go based of something i can see and work from there. not saying my art is good anyways, but i couldnt figure out how to make abstract art myself lol
Art is art. If it looks good, then that's enough. If carries a meaning, even better.
The thing about abstract art is, it gains meaning as you talk about it. I managed to make my professors believe a canvas which I painted red 30 mins before the class was an abstract representation of my favorite song(That was the assignment). I got 90 over 100 for that assignment and I remember this one girl, she was working on a clay sculpture for the same assignment for a week and she got 65. My god I remember her face. It is the very first thing that comes to my mind whenever someone talks about abstract or modern art. It is not hard or anything. You just have to pretend like it is the most important thing in life. That's all
Yeah for some reason it's harder than you'd think to create something pleasing to one's self.
@@stormevans6897 considering most famous artists hate their paintings so much that the hate transfered over to themselves and they maimed/killed themselves in anger.
Kinda shows you won't like your works when you make them and you need an outside opinion to judge your work properly.
All art is abstract to some degree. The way you choose to present your realistic work still requires some degree of subjective judgement and creativity on your part.
Even the laziest and most utilitarian industrial photographer has to make some creative choices when deciding on what angles he needs, what type of lens or film stock he should use, and how he should go about lighting his subjects.
Even the most realistic art cannot literally capture every aspect of a moment perfectly; it can only capture a limited impression-and it's the job of the artist to decide what parts that impression needs to emphasise, or what the scope of that captured impression should be.
this reminds me of the one time I went to an art museum and they had like an abstract modern art exhibit, and some of it was honestly very cool, and then there was. The grass table. It was a table with like fake turf grass on top of it and there was like. A thing it was attached to that made it shake. And I just. What? Huh? (I also remember the exhibit had a thing with these bead where you'd put like colored beads in these little bins next to the art and like each bead corresponded to like an emotion that the piece made you feel or whatever, almost every bin was 70-90% full of the beads for "confused" and thats so funny to me)
What were the other beads?
That's how I feel after reading this
@@quinn799 up the artist's ass, of course!
Ok thats pretty funny
“It will haunt me for at least half an hour”
We need more critics like this.
Being an artist myself and how I struggle to get my stuff seen it baffles me what gets displayed out there lol
You probably just put in effort. It seems like everything that gets put in galleries takes 5 minutes to make.
for real, spend like two weeks on certain pieces yet someone can tape a banana to a wall n it's art smh
I imagine modern “artists” must pretentiously walk around Florence and Rome unimpressed by the majestic renaissance art
No the reason why realistic art is not in many museums is because it’s nothing special anymore we’ve known how to do it for over a thousand years. To the point we are at today with contemporary art was a slow evolution of getting more abstract and looking at the world differently. These artist know the renaissance was defined by that style of art and that’s what defined the era there just so different you can’t compare them.
@@steamyspiceisnice9665 We've also known how to put snot on a canvas for thousands of years too, and yet you would have trouble finding art that can crack even that low level of quality, skill or effort in a modern art gallery today. At least back when cavemen were making handprints and animals on the walls of their caves, that _was_ the absolute height of painting that was physically possible, and they left behind some damn good hunting scenes.
"getting more abstract" in modern art is basically just code for "we can't compare our work favorably to our ancestors without putting in actual effort, so let's cope by saying that ackshyually the ideas of quality, skill and effort are bad and backwards."
It's all one giant case of sour grapes, nothing more.
Fun fact:
Last October, Damien Hirst started selling his works as NFTs, and burning the physical versions… 🤦♂️
Which makes sense,
considering they were basically NFTs before NFTs
The art community can be so fucking snooty. It’s just a nice, cozy painting that someone made to appeal to a lot more people than an abstract would.
Critical should watch more solar sands ngl
Definitely, tho some of his vids might be a bit too long or not the type of thing that is easy to commentate on. Still would be fun to see.
Its really baffling to me that people cant distinguish the difference between the art and the artists. You can hate the artists but at the same time you can also like the art
I think it's funny that these artists are complaining about the art meaning nothing.
Like bruh, not everything has to have a meaning, some things are genuinely just meant to be surface level.
exactly sometimes it's nice to just see something beautiful or sad without anything else tacked on
@@pleasedonotvisitmychannel well to be fair if I was a mom Kincaid coulda stole me long as he painted me like one of his french girls
The meaning can also be… comfort. Home. Peace. They’re choosing to ignore other meanings because they can’t apply a pseudo intellectual argument to it being a critique of society, and thus being “valuable”.
Best wishes on not having this taken down. I know vods often have that issue.
My mom had loads of Thomas Kinkaid things when I was growing up… So maybe it’s nostalgia, but I can’t hate the art.
I don't hate it but I definitely don't like his type of "comfort."
art snobs be like, "stop liking what i dont like!"
Art world: *looks at Kincaid painting* “How are we supposed to launder money with this?”
I actually love the art styles of artists like Thomas Kinkade and Terry Redlin. Makes me think of times when I was younger despite only being 20 years old.
I think there was one more artist who might be a little more hated. Failed to get in art school in Vienna. Was a mustache model. Had minor anger issues.
But I dont think people hated him as an artist.. as a genocidal maniac sure :D
@@Naesil89 nah, it was clearly his artwork people were mad about.
And is 6 million people really a genocide? That's more like a crazy night.
@@Naesil89well, he did fail art school. At a minimum his teachers hated him as an artist. Probably as a leader too, I imagine he didnt treat them very well.
I’m fairly certain my grandma had one of these paintings in her living room back in the day lol
(everyone knows the best painter is Ringo Starr anyway)
Idk just off the top of my head I can think of an artist hated much more than this guy
Hitler
I had the same thought when I saw the title of this video
I rarely see people hating on his art tho when his art is mentioned or shown
The difference is that people don't hate "the artist Hitler" but "the megalomaniac Hitler". They might be the same person but the reason for the hate is very different
For some reason this is controversial take because people will always be debatelord andy to anyone that says it istg but-
Imo, as an artist, Hitler's art wasn't good and I mean that from both a philosophical and technical level. I'm not a fan of Kinkade's work but Kinkade at least had technical skill and a sense of scale to his works. I completely understand why Hitler was rejected from art college especially in comparison to the artist who got his place, Egon Schiele, who not only made art works that were more interesting and unique/experimentalthan him but also showed in his portfolio a great level of understanding realism, perspective, light, scale, composition etc. But people get really bizarrely defensive about Hitler's work lol
But in the end like another commenter said, people don't really hate Hitler as an artist but they hate him for being a fascist, genocidal, megalomaniac, dictator.
Art student here, and my studio Art Professors tend to favor weird and wacky art that has a ‘deep meaning’ behind it. Me and a few students make up stuff sometimes to give it more meaning than ‘this is a nice color' or ‘I like the composition’ a lot.
I wanna see a modern artist absolutely tear apart nfts 😊
Modern artists are making NFTs, its the same stuff.
@@petulantpeterturbo not always. A lot of modern artists don't make nfts :)
@@petulantpeterturbo most modern artists dont put their shit in exhibitions. their stuffs on packaging, billboards, films, phone cases, tshirts, bottles etc. the ones that make nft's just do something simple to make a quick buck. Behance is a good representation of modern art and its just an app.
nfts and most modern artists make the same garbage
Both modern artists and nfts are pretentious garbage
I feel like modern scribble art is kitsche (or whatever) by the very root of the definition. Attempts to make you feel like it has a porpuse and it is deep in meaning but at the end it means nothing
That is pretty much the opposite of what abstract art tries to achieve. Abstract art is in a way just like normal art, it tries to provoke thoughts or emotions. However the idea behind abstract art is in HOW the artist will achieve that through the most "different" or inovative way possible. Like "how would I make this piece sad without building explicitly sad scenarios"
It is exactly that, real abstract art is the complete opposite to that as Gabi here just said, to convey an emotion through the formlessness and the subtleness, most "abstract art" today (or let's be real here they're money laundering schemes) need like an entire freaking essay to explain why it exist and why it is emotionally challenging, which is the exact opposite of what it is surposed to do. Trust me you'll know great abstract art when you see it
@@tenderandmoist5011 what about who's afraid of red yellow and blue? especially 3
These are the type of people who pay thousands of dollars to see 1 red dot on a canvas, but hate people that have more talent than them
Charlie insulting Keith Haring’s work was pretty painful ngl… I’m sure he didn’t know who he was or what his art was developed for but still. He was incredibly talented and influential
Yeah I wish someone told him lol
Charlie doesn’t seem to know much about art. Not knocking him for it, but it’s kinda hard to watch in this video. Yeah, people’s reactions to Kinkaid were ridiculous, but the point itself is not entirely pretentious.
@@blueorpheus5693 yeah love the guy but his commentary here was kind of embarrassing…
Just because something is influential doesn't mean it's any good and Keith Harings work is some of the worst junk I've ever seen.
@@blueorpheus5693 art isn't important ofc he doesn't know much who does
charlie going "that looks about right" upon seeing keith haring's art killed me 😭 usually i at least understand where he's coming from even if i don't agree with him, but keith haring is such a talented and interesting and influential artist i just cannot understand the dismissal.
i couldn’t agree more. i think charlie just thinks any art minimalistic is bad
Every time I see a Kinkaid it makes me feel happy. They're over-saturated both literally and figuratively, but that's okay. So is Pepsi.
Abstract art is not bullshit. The prices for it, however, are an entirety different discussion. . .
I like impressionism, realism, surrealism, and most European art from the 1500s-1800s. They look nice and are also thought provoking. Abstract art, modern art, and action painting don't really do it for me though. I do have to admit that some modern art pieces would look nice on a wall in a contemporary style house though.
My favorite artist is Zidslaw Beksinski. His art is breathtaking.
Oh yes!
One of my favorites. Ashame that he wasn't born sooner
oh yeah HIS work is magnificent
Yeah he definitely did lsd or something his art is weird.
@@deadboltzz5199 He did go through a war.
Lmaoooo people really hate T.K but then pretend they feel something from starring at a random paint drippings that was made in like 5 minutes and sold for 5 million.
Just some haters mad at my dawg Thomas stacking his bread. “Get your money up, not your funny up” -Thomas Kinkade
When it comes to figuring out if an artist is genuinely good at visual art, I follow the "French Dispatch" philosophy of asking them to draw something perfectly to test if they can actually make great art if they felt like it.
I love when that same philosophy is applied to modern composers of 20th-century and contemporary classical music. I think it's amazing when I discover that composers who write some of the most abstract and avant-garde music ever do a complete 180 and are also able to write some of the most beautiful and emotionally-rich tonal music as well. Those are the greats of present times and the last 100 years. They prove that they have all the skills and talent that we see in tonal composers like Beethoven or Bach, and they use their skills to go further and also write great avant-garde music as well. Such composers include Alfred Schnittke, John Cage, Arnold Schoenberg, Krzysztof Penderecki, and so many more.
@@fabiangutierrez339 You could have just said you admired Bartók and we all would have understood.
I love art, it's been a part of me since I was little, and there is just an uncanny valley around his art that they are pretentiously attempting to put a finger on
It's the insincerity-the "fake emotions", as the video put it. It's not that those emotions don't exist, but that they aren't a genuine expression on the part of Kincaid himself. The emotion of the scene isn't supplied by the painting, or by the painter, but by the viewer-like the meaningless ink blots of a Rorschach test, except those don't try to pretend to be deep and complex, or anything other than the utilitarian scientific tools they were created to serve as.
The reason you don't have the same reaction with Bob Ross is because the works he showcased were never really meant as art for their own sake-they were meant to teach other people how to use techniques in their own work-they were practical educational tools that never masqueraded as anything else. Bob Ross didn't try to*trick* his viewers and swindle them the way Thomas Kincaid did.
A lot of modern art is artists trying to make some sort of ironic commentary on something but failing and just being like “we I guess I can use this for money laundering” 😰
It’s like they heard about the concept of anti-art in a class once, didn’t understand that they were being made fun of, then tried to make some themselves, but they were way too serious about it so it just doesn’t work 🙃
I love Charlie but that disregard for Keith harring was dirty
Artist: oh my god this is a masterpiece such deep and complex concepts
Average person: It's a banana taped to a wall
Abstract art is important, because usually it's the people who think outside of the box that come up with innovative ideas. Look at A Day On The Life by The Beatles, both the interlude and ending use something more abstract/experimental and it benefits the song as a whole. Without abstract/experimental artists, art would be dull because no one would have the balls to do anything too different. Just the same 4-chords, just the same wooden house next to a river.
There's a difference between abstract and stupid.
@@jordanhewson8287 the problem is, that line is subjective. in my humble opinion, Jackson Pollocks art was seriously misunderstood even today. Damien Hurst, however, is another story
@@jordanhewson8287 stupidity, as in how "stupid" an artwork is, is entirely based on your knowledge about the piece and your personal opinion on it. Saying "there's abstract and there's stupid" is completely meaningless because it entirely relays on your personal opinion of what is stupid and what isn't
There are legit abstract artists but a lot of weak artists hide behind """abstract""" art that is really just normal art done shitty. Instead of actually gaining any skills and working on bettering themselves they would just try to say that their fucked up anatomy and poor color theory was just "abstract art" when it really was just them being lazy.
@@gabiferreira6864 nah there's definitely abstract """"artists"""" that just want the title of an artist but are lazy and stupid. There are genuinely good abstract pieces of art but some people put in 0 effort and should be called out.
So i looked up Damien Hirst's art work since I hadn't heard of him before and as an artist it hurts to see that something I could've made in elementary school would go for 2k. Its like why even bother improving and scraping in small commission after small commission when some pretentious asshole can just take a bingo dobber to a canvas and make 2k.
like art is something that's very important to me and the influx of "abstract painters" in recent years upsets me. Absract art isn't something like a circle on a paper that someone made bullshit up about. IMO, if its to qualify as abstract ART, it needs to be able to make the viewer feel, understand or relate in some way without any hint of explanation, or it is simply not good.
I'm sorry! nobody asked for this! i just needed it off my chest. GOD I hate pretentious assholes.
Even if abstract art doesn't directly invoke an emotion, I think the best kind is the kind where you can tell it took genuine effort.
You came to the right place to rant though, most everyone here seems to agree with you.
@@mellow_mallow yeah exactly
@@azakranos8100 yeahh, but who doesn't hate pretentious assholes, am I right? hah
@@mellow_mallow like who's afraid of red yellow and blue
For anyone who's curious. Modern art is NOT modern. You can hate Modern art but it is not literally modern. The modern art period spans the 1860s through the 1870s, we are currently in the CONTEMPORARY art period. Which strives to do the opposite of what the modern art period tried to do. Contemporary art is cool af, modern art is from a by-gone era and is no longer necessary in progressing art. Don't hate modern contemporary art, you're swinging at the wrong people. ANYHOW I love art and art history. The digital age has absolutely skyrocketed the contemporary art movement and I love it with my whole heart LMAO
I'd argue that thanks to furries and the internet, art is now primarily representational again.
Lmao
Just like how pop music isn’t pop anymore
"The modern art period spans the 1860s through the 1870s"
No, just objectively no.
you mistook 1970 for 1870 and you got contemporary mixed up with post modern.
I want to become a billionaire art collector and only collect original Kinkade's. Imagine the cope.
I'd also collect Terry Redlin since his artwork is similar.
5:20 get to stare at this man’s face whilst listening to demonic gurgling noises. Absolutely lovely.
Ok thought it was just me and my headphones but now we know he got a ghost Or demon. Maybe he will do a vid on it!
29:00
Cmon, that one looks awesome
You were being petty there
it looks like something i would have drawn on the blacktop at school in kindergarten
@@lxmesoda oh sorry mr van gogh
woah how did they get my art from when I was 4 years old?
You guys didnt see the whole drawing on the side charlie is covering is a face staring into that light :) it's not just scribbles i think its some guy staring into a tv type thingy projecting on what hes watching :D or thats how i see it
It’s just cool colors man. Colors are cool, make monkey brain go “ooo”
It was this video that made me realize that for my entire life, I’ve had one of these painting in my house
Never let insecured people get you down below rock bottom and keep on doing what you do.
14:10 Charlie attempts to create a speculative bubble
This is the most pretentious TH-cam comment section I’ve ever read
So you're telling me I can go into the backroom of Walmart, take a picture, and its modern art?
5:05 Damn boi, you frying chicken in there?
When the painting by Banksy destroyed itself after being sold for over a million, I understood the absolute insanity. The people that can afford to buy a painting by an elephant for thousands of dollars when it is absolute garbage make the industry intolerable for talented artists.
I learned drawing and painting by myself, but Bob Ross was a light in the dark realm of getting better and maybe faster... my absolute favourite is Joseph Mallord Turner, he's the painter of light of the 19th century! Kitsch is Biedermeier art!
he comes back at 6:32
Much obliged.
Some people are overly pretentious about art my god
I’m an artist and I just draw furries. It doesn’t have “meaning” I just think it’s fun and people like my art that’s about it 😭
Any artists who think Boss Ross was kitsch and overrated are talentless hacks.
If I could put the crazy detailed, weird, nsfw art that I like from Instagram and Twitter in an art museum, I WOULD !
I like his art.
I also believe anyone who spends a single penny on an NFT is the dumbest form of existence on earth.
charlie should make a whole vid of him looking at modern art
as much as “modern art” like the banana taped to a wall shits on good art, don’t do keith haring like that lmao
For artists people hate I'll probably catch flak for it but I despise Warhol. His art just seems so ridiculously lazy and from what I've read about the guy he seemed incredibly pretentious for a guy who made giant brillo boxes and soup cans.
There's two points about Warhol that most people miss.
The first is that the banality of his works focusing on commercially mass-produced household items was entirely intended-a sort-of metatextual commentary on the banality of everyday life in mid-twentieth-century America, and how sharply that life contrasts (what were at the time) the norms of the art world. Like it or not, there's a point to it-something is being said on a conceptual level. It's essentially the same kind of satire featured prominently in the films of Paul Verhoeven, or the comedy of Matt Stone and Trey Parker.
The second point (and one that's a lot more important when discussing Warhol specifically) is that he did so much other stuff in other media besides just the graphic prints that everybody is familiar with, and in fact, he considered his other works more important and interesting. He was a prolific sculptor, filmmaker, and live performer-and very few people outside the modernist art scene have actually seen or are even aware of any of the work he did in those other fields. To judge him as an artist solely based on one project he did in one medium that wasn't even his main focus as a creator is either misguided or disingenuous.
I'm not a fan of Warhol or his "Factory" entourage, but he wasn't the complete and total hack people who only know like two of his works make him out to be either.
@@DistractedGlobeGuy I understand the point he was trying to get across in his art. He was trying to make fun of the classical sensibilities of the time. I have also seen some of his sculptures and such as well and I don't doubt that they weren't well made or made without skill. I just don't have a preference for his work or even Warhol himself. In my opinion and this is probably gonna be more flak worthy but I am not a fan of the artist himself as a person and the person matters just as much as the art itself. Now perhaps that is from ignorance but from everything I read about Warhol he really didn't seem like anything other than a narcissist. I can sympathize with the want to be recognized and praised for ones work but with Warhol it just rubs me the wrong way. Don't get me wrong I love a good troll or getting that south Park style reaction but most of Warhol's well known works don't evoke that feeling or much of anything really. Thats a fail imo since art is meant to provoke something and I just don't think Warhol does that with the vast majority of his work. I could go on and on about why I'm not a Warhol fan.
@@booleah6357 that's exactly how I feel about it.
I'm fine with a.i taking jobs away from guys like this lol
screenshot 52 soup cans and put them in the same picture :^)
honestly idc if it was comerciality capitalism bla bla bla the art is just boring and bland he should have draw a cool dragon or something
Everybody ignoring how Charlie had the exact idea that the nft guys had👀👀
I went to the tate modern one year for a college outing and one of, and the most memorable, 'art pieces' was a recept from tesco put on the wall. I wish I was joking. I took a picture of it but I've since lost that.
my CVS receipts are masterpieces
When can we learn to just let people be with what they like, whether it be art or food, or whatever
never
People writing articles criticizing Kincaid for creating art for religious reasons probably wouldn't want to meet Leonardo Davinci or Michelangelo
wtf i love art like this
yoooooo i have one of his originals on my dining room wall
@@MoistMoments 👉👈
In my country Kic (kitsch) means something with alot of vibrant colors, alot of ornaments, excessive details, alot of subject doing alot of things. There may be even alot of different composition within compositions, telling alot of storys... To bring that overwhelming feeling just add, add, add. And in general i like when its made correctly, but its hard because of so much elements you need to balance. Unfortunately most of the people who like it and do it are not good artists or artists at all. So alot of people who like kic decorate their homes like Bosch's Hell paintings. In terms of this guy. Hes just making colors alot more vibrant to make that "toy" like look. And painting do lack depth, one would make this for practice, If it was photography, it would be made by a instagram model taking photos of a Christmas fayre. Stock photos of paintings. Pinterest before it existed.
Alright specifically modern sculpture art is the coolest $h!t.
One I saw a couple of years ago was several home items like chairs, shoes, books, bowls, wooden spoons, etc.
They were set up on a spinning floor and the smaller items were on spinning wooden stands.
It was like a planetarium of home items and they were ordered by importance the closer to the center they got.
I think that’s the strength of art galleries, 3d art sculptures you can’t just view online.
Hnm..... Interesting, imagine that in a painting I'd buy n like that more rather than irl
Kinkade is a skilled artist, no doubt. My main issue is the title "painter of light" he uses light but not in an interesting way. I don't think people really hate him. But within the art world just doing what sells is always looked down on for some stupid reason.
I love that he has Speedrun times for Granny 3 pulled up lol
we shouldn't make any artist mad, last time we did he started a world war.
honestly i really did like that damien hurst thing with all the pills in it. but more just because it’s interesting to look at all the pills not because it’s particularly creative or involved. it’s definitely be a cool piece to have in the waiting room at your doctors office but it’s not art.
I REALLY want charlie to watch solar sands' jackson pollocks on drip painting video
If anything, we leaned Charlie hates Jackson Pollock 😂
he actually painted fairly well ngl
they say Pollock isn't actually doing random paint splats but arranging them in a fractal pattern
I mean, I'm a skills appreciation guy and I think that's awesome if true
when charlie goes through a different tab but all we can see is his frozen tab reminds me in school when the teacher would freeze the smart board
I work in framing… my boss has lost count of how many of these she’s framed
I’ve framed possibly 10 to 18 in the year I’ve worked there
Also about 75% of my mom’s puzzles are painted by him, I love them
his art is great and rather whimsical
Thanks, I basically only watch these vods.
You're welcome, thank you
Same, I've been watching since 2014, and I used to feel like I got left behind when he started streaming because I could never catch him
Now there's several high-quality channels dedicated to making sure I can watch whenever
This is a true reupload. Left in the pee break and all.
I’ve always loved Kinkade paintings. My mom loves them and it will always make me feel nostalgic and happy because I had a good childhood 🤗 These haters sound unwell.
Of course Charlie can only interpret art as a skill to be better or worse at rather than a form of expression
But you need good skills to express properly.
@@mast3rbang in the context of self expression there are no rights or wrongs
so if I took a steamy shit on a canvas and then smeared it around with my bare foot that would count as self expression right
@@mast3rbang no you don't unless your intention is to express something that requires technical skill
@@Aidan-wu2ec yes and if you took three crusty cum rags and stacked them up thatd be considered construction. and if you cut into someone with your fingernails to remove a tumor that would be considered surgery. and if you rammed your car through a storefront thatd be considered driving
i think the fact that charlie is so fascinated by modern art, even in a negative way, is sort of funny because i think that's almost the point of modern art? like.. sometimes the point is to get those reactions i think. it's meant to be outrageous. I'm not saying all of it is good, i guess I'm sort of explaining why nobody defends modern art when he's baffled by it
no the vast majority is hot garbage, and quite plainly not art
@@yowtfputthemaskbackon9202 stop making a fool of yourself, you sound ridiculous
@@yowtfputthemaskbackon9202 Alright Mr. Van Gogh, what is art?
@@AJvsTheInternet plenty of things, as even the mouthbreathers that enjoy looking at little timmy's first attempt at finger painting for 40 grand a piece would agree, since they call various forms of painting and other creative outputs"not art" if said creations do not conform to their comprehension of art.
and in an effort to associate with these poor souls, a genuine attempt at compassion, i have decided to also rule out a wide selection of creations, mainly the ones that can be replicated by 4 year olds.
also my name is not "van" anything as i am not dutch, thank goodness
I can’t blame him
For his insanity and drinking himself to death, imagine being slandered despite producing such heartwarming works with an arguably good message behind them
I'm an artist and i've studied it for a few years. His art is cool no debate, I love cottages and I'll never understand art snobs :,)
The minutes of dead air when he goes to piss is left in the TH-cam edit 👌
28:50 or so is gold the whole art review, I was dead at "it's just boxes" 😂
Edit: loss my second life at 32:32 w the S tier use of "wtf"
35:30 this has to be the most intimidating game of Jenga I’ve ever seen
Main thing I recall seeing in defense of modern art is Jacob Geller's video "Who's Afraid Of Modern Art"
Allow me to smear my fecal matter on a piece of paper!
Now give me 2 million dollars.
Ah, yes. Pretentious, gatekeeping-inspired hatred. Classic art world.