Considering the consistent amount of confusion on the JP Poll, despite your best efforts to constantly clarify that it’s a power rating and not a ranking, why not change it to “Josh Pate Power Rate”? It’s catchy, clear, maybe people would think it should be “Power Rating” but they’d get over that soon enough. Whereas “JP Poll” is consistently misconstrued and it doesn’t look like that is changing anytime soon. Please consider.
I don't think it'll matter. He could call it "Josh Pates Power Ratings NOT fucking rankings, again, POWER RATINGS NOT RANKINGS" and people will still be upset that Army isn't top 10.
Agreed regarding the likely benefit of a name change. The first problem, of course, is one of defining. It’s not a poll. Josh knows this and addresses it in his disclaimer. But, disclaimers can’t possibly head off confusion on a medium like TwitterX.
I understand his poll, all he does is see what Vegas says in a head to head matchup in a neutral site game lol. He doesn’t have any input on it no matter how ridiculous the results are. If SEC is highly rated then that’s all that matters to him because of bias
I have no idea why Pate continues to use a betting site for points spreads and using point spreads for a poll, considering that point spreads ARE NOT predictive. They just aren't. They are for the sole purpose of attempting to get the money that is wagered to be equal on both sides. It is predictive of what gamblers believe. If gamblers change their minds, the spreads change. I think I'm shadow banned, so no one will see this anyway.
In Bielemas defense, JP poll may be unfairly skewed towards SEC (as is Vegas). I mean look at the bowl spreads and outcomes of SEC vs Big Ten teams Ohio St. covered vs Tennessee USC covered vs A&M (won outright as underdog) Miz. covered vs Iowa (by half point) Michigan covered vs Bama (won outright as underdog) Illinois covered vs SC (won outright as underdog) Ohio st. covered vs Texas So, in 6 big ten vs SEC matchups, big ten covered 5 (3 underdog straight up wins) and the only one they didn’t cover was by half point.
@@chuckwest7045 yea bama beat a 5-7 Wisconsin team with their backup QB, Texas beat a 7-5 Michigan team with no QB lol, LSU beat a 5-7 UCLA team, 6-6 USC beat LSU. Not that impressive if you ask me.
@@HerbHerman-le5ux The games involving Wisconsin and Michigan were played in Big Ten stadiums. UCLA was the worst looking Power 5 team that I've seen in Baton Rouge in years. Point being, the Big Ten was weaker at the bottom than the SEC was.
I understand what the JP poll is trying to say, but I don't understand the point of it. I would be much more interested in your actual personal rankings of the teams. But the JP poll just uses Vegas power rankings, you slap your name on it, and then you defend yourself that these aren't really your rankings when people come after you. So what's the point of it? I could just check Vegas odds and lines if I wanted to know what they think.
Josh, I don’t care about being ahead of South Carolina, but I feel like there’s no way that Illinois wouldn’t be favored over Iowa or Minnesota on a neutral field
Josh is missing Brets point. He’s saying that Josh and Vegas are underrating ILL and the program in general!!! They think this season was a one off and that this team will return to being a fringe bowl team because their roster is composed of mainly 3 ⭐️. Bc at the end of the day nothing matters more than having 4&5 ⭐️
Point spreads are not predictive of anticipated results. They are a method of attempting to entice gamblers to bet equal amounts of money on each team. Using point spreads as a method of rating isn't good for anything for something that is decided by players and not gamblers.
@@JoshPateCFB If it "isn't completely accurate", define exactly why point spreads exist. Then explain exactly what causes point spreads to change when nothing has changed in regards to either team's personnel. The true answer to both questions confirm what I originally said is actually completely accurate.
@ you are misunderstanding the generation of the line itself. Those numbers are based almost entirely on internal power rating numbers and only slightly adjusted for market release if at all.
When you have to make a video explaining something while passive aggressively saying "don't like it don't watch it" there is a good possibility that its not working, or JP stepped on lego and needs to lash out.
LOL, if you need to explain it every week, it's not a thing. Just let it go. Your poll is just not even accurate. Oh, right, it's not supposed to be accurate, It's the JP poll. It's just right. About what? Nothing. But EVERYTHING. Got it. The gaslighting , bro. Clown emoji sounds right. And your opinion of roster strength is just not predictive of anything except your bias. Oh, snap, I said it. Model is biased. It's deductive, you simply cannot argue that point. Plus, I'm just so much smarter than you. Respectfully.
Its purpose is to determine who is favored over who on a neutral field. It does its job most of true time in that regard. If you think the model is terrible and biased, you must think Vegas lines are terrible and biased, so you should be all over the Vegas lines
@NikolaiG8 yes, Vegas lines are designed to get people to gamble money in such a way that Vegas profits off the outcome, not predict how the game will go
It’s bias and not even accurate you say? Well isn’t over half of the top 10 at the beginning of the year still in the top 10 at the end of the year? Seems, dare I say it, pretty accurate
I think the JP poll is fine for what it does. What I don’t think is that the JP poll is ranking anything people are interested in. The majority of polls are focused on either what team would win against other teams or what teams have accomplished more on the field. The JP poll rates… what Vegas would put out for people to lose money gambling against them? I don’t think that’s necessarily reflective of what people look for in a top 25. Particularly given the amount of people getting sick of seeing betting and gambling take over coverage of sports in general.
It’s just bait at this point. There is clearly an issue with the name if you constantly have to explain what it is. If everybody misunderstands it that is not their issue it’s yours. Be a big man and rename it.
@@JoshPateCFBI regularly watch the show and understand it. But I also understand that if you call something a "poll" and compare it to the AP Poll each week, you shouldn't act surprised when people think it's a ranking. JP poll is due for a rebrand.
Much love Josh. Seasons over and we already have seen how the season turned out. The poll is straight up silly. Maybe a game or two could go either way but someone will lost alot of money trying to bet against results we have already seen play out.
I love this show and know how search optimization works, but the fact is....Calling it the JP "Poll" is 100% CLICKBAIT. You are DELIBERATELY LYING because you know "Poll" gives better algorithm results. Yeah, everyone has to bow to the algorithm, but not with lies as bold faced as this. (Again, love this show, but on this particular issue the only way to describe it is deceptive)
Love Josh but him not understanding that calling the power rating as a "poll" is total misinformation. There's no polling at all. It's like calling Kenpom a poll when it's a rating system.
I have watched your channel for years. I completely understand the purpose with your "poll", Neutral Field Favorability (NFF). However, just like with the service academies, it appears your model needs significant tweaking for undervaluing B1G mid-level teams. Maybe just bin it and start over. 😜 At least you recognize that "poll" is a misnomer. Maybe if you setup multiple NFF models and combine them as your ranking?
I understand how the poll works so I can't speak for anyone else. Personally I don't see a need for it given the various polls already available to fans. That being said it isn't my show so you do you.
It might be advantageous to call this show what it really is. “Josh Pate’s Power 4 Football Show” Love the content, but this isn’t a College Football show. Rarely are the other ~60-70 CFB programs referenced on this show. Occasionally just some shade thrown towards the highest 1 or 2 G5 programs about how irrelevant they are.
@ I agree with that, but would still offer pushback. He talks about important matchups as it relates to the playoff. There are plenty of “important” matchups that don’t necessarily have playoff implications. There are 130+ FBS programs and he discusses roughly 20.
Yes in a sense he is misunderstanding the poll But Illinois does call into question even the validity of the JP poll for what it is… Wins over Michigan and South Carolina, only losses to Penn state, Minnesota, and oregon…feel like that would be top 25 neutral field
I think that the JP poll is useful if you know it's a power ranking. Josh Pate knew Florida was better than their record while I thought they were dead in the water.
ngl I clicked on the video and saw it was Bret Bielema and was disappointed in myself cause I should have guessed that it was gonna be the biggest 🤡 in the Big 10
I like JP Power Tower of Neutral Site Odds. Crazy to me every week you have to explain the whole thing all over again, maybe it’s a sign of new viewers, but I’m afraid people are just dumb.
Looking at this poll a South Carolina did have their top running back that won a few games alone and top defensive player in the country didn’t play in last game so no problem with that. This poll is close to right.
I swear you explain it differently every time someone has an issue with it. And if it you disagree with the model with certain matchups, why title it the JP poll 😂.
“Based on neutral field favorability” more like based on recruiting rankings which are skewed to make it look like the SEC brings in 300 4⭐️ players a cycle
From the point of view of the recruiting sources, why would they skew the rankings? Maybe you can have a case and argument with ESPN but 247, Rivals, and On3 don’t have any stake in the SEC so there is no reason to promote them
@NikolaiG8do you really think scouts can fairly evaluate 1000s of players? They get lazy and just rank players based off the prestige of the schools that are recruiting them
All these college people can't even use good English! It is not "Must have came early," it is "must have come early"! Who cares about the objections? We'll see how it works out this fall.
But .. its not a projection.... Its not for next year... Its a final poll .. if a team beat another team at the end of the year that should mean more for the final poll than bettting odds........?.... The only person confused here is Josh.... Ill gladly explain if he'll have me on.....
@ he calls it a poll. a final poll at that... the season is over what else are you going to make? a go to fansided and see who is favored against who list? either make a final poll like you call it or make a projection for next year... this weird final projection non sense it just that... complete ignorance...
@@chasejordan22 It’s a misnomer that Pate addressed in this video and in prior videos. He’s sloppily created this definitional confusion. Words have meaning. It’s not a poll. My initial reply did not contemplate your taking issue with this. I wasn’t disagreeing with you. 😄
Bama is the perfect example of why this "rating" isn't predictive. Gamblers still have faith in Bama and they still think they will win. BUT they don't. Point spreads are not predictive. I wonder if this account is shadow banned?
I thought was strictly about being lines, which don't necessarily favor the better team, but now Josh, you say thebetyer team doesn't always win-which is true, but at the sane time, sometimes the team we think are better, aren't actually better. That's where the field comes into the equation. No way on Earth South Carolina should be ranked that much higher than Illinois by ANY metric. Absolutely no way. Btw, you're the best, keep up the great work!
@@pigalow2002 it isn’t a ranking. And what you are arguing is indisputable - I literally provided the evidence from FanDuel. South Carolina would still be nearly a 10pt favorite vs Illinois if they played again.
Keep the show free - SUBSCRIBE to the channel! - JP
Considering the consistent amount of confusion on the JP Poll, despite your best efforts to constantly clarify that it’s a power rating and not a ranking, why not change it to “Josh Pate Power Rate”? It’s catchy, clear, maybe people would think it should be “Power Rating” but they’d get over that soon enough. Whereas “JP Poll” is consistently misconstrued and it doesn’t look like that is changing anytime soon. Please consider.
Also considering the names Jp pole and ap pole are very similar in their names. It would be good to differentiate.
I don't think it'll matter. He could call it "Josh Pates Power Ratings NOT fucking rankings, again, POWER RATINGS NOT RANKINGS" and people will still be upset that Army isn't top 10.
He can’t print endless content with trolling. That’s the only reason he even does the poll
Agreed regarding the likely benefit of a name change. The first problem, of course, is one of defining. It’s not a poll. Josh knows this and addresses it in his disclaimer. But, disclaimers can’t possibly head off confusion on a medium like TwitterX.
Did you even bother watching the video?
Looks like most of the people commenting really don't understand how the JP poll works.
Ignorance is bliss 😂
I understand his poll, all he does is see what Vegas says in a head to head matchup in a neutral site game lol. He doesn’t have any input on it no matter how ridiculous the results are. If SEC is highly rated then that’s all that matters to him because of bias
@ you sound dumb asf lol. How you gonna blame Vegas and then blame him directly for their odds smh
as yes Illinois’s head coach Bret Bielema is very smart and knows the difference between power rankings and standings. LOL
I have no idea why Pate continues to use a betting site for points spreads and using point spreads for a poll, considering that point spreads ARE NOT predictive. They just aren't. They are for the sole purpose of attempting to get the money that is wagered to be equal on both sides. It is predictive of what gamblers believe. If gamblers change their minds, the spreads change. I think I'm shadow banned, so no one will see this anyway.
BB is a clown. If you're pissing him off then you're doing something right.
In Bielemas defense, JP poll may be unfairly skewed towards SEC (as is Vegas). I mean look at the bowl spreads and outcomes of SEC vs Big Ten teams
Ohio St. covered vs Tennessee
USC covered vs A&M (won outright as underdog)
Miz. covered vs Iowa (by half point)
Michigan covered vs Bama (won outright as underdog)
Illinois covered vs SC (won outright as underdog)
Ohio st. covered vs Texas
So, in 6 big ten vs SEC matchups, big ten covered 5 (3 underdog straight up wins) and the only one they didn’t cover was by half point.
...it's almost like vegas sets lines based on public perception to get 50/50 bets laid and take home the vig. crazy theory?
Dude... they favor sec because the public... sigh...
There were also four regular season games between the two conferences. The SEC won three of those.
@@chuckwest7045 yea bama beat a 5-7 Wisconsin team with their backup QB, Texas beat a 7-5 Michigan team with no QB lol, LSU beat a 5-7 UCLA team, 6-6 USC beat LSU. Not that impressive if you ask me.
@@HerbHerman-le5ux The games involving Wisconsin and Michigan were played in Big Ten stadiums. UCLA was the worst looking Power 5 team that I've seen in Baton Rouge in years. Point being, the Big Ten was weaker at the bottom than the SEC was.
Josh clearly has no idea that lines are about getting people to bet on both sides and not actual predictions😂
I understand what the JP poll is trying to say, but I don't understand the point of it. I would be much more interested in your actual personal rankings of the teams. But the JP poll just uses Vegas power rankings, you slap your name on it, and then you defend yourself that these aren't really your rankings when people come after you. So what's the point of it? I could just check Vegas odds and lines if I wanted to know what they think.
So the JP poll is just useless?
More importantly…Any Head Coach who has the time to get annoyed about this and tweet a comment isn’t a Head coach.
You dont think coaches have time to tweet? Man im glad thats not real life...
Josh, I don’t care about being ahead of South Carolina, but I feel like there’s no way that Illinois wouldn’t be favored over Iowa or Minnesota on a neutral field
They were a 3 point dog at home vs Minnesota and lost by 8??
Bama is an EPIC program and will continue to be, however having the 2024 team at #8 is silly.
Josh is missing Brets point. He’s saying that Josh and Vegas are underrating ILL and the program in general!!! They think this season was a one off and that this team will return to being a fringe bowl team because their roster is composed of mainly 3 ⭐️. Bc at the end of the day nothing matters more than having 4&5 ⭐️
Point spreads are not predictive of anticipated results. They are a method of attempting to entice gamblers to bet equal amounts of money on each team. Using point spreads as a method of rating isn't good for anything for something that is decided by players and not gamblers.
@@kevinporter7216 this isn’t completely accurate
@@JoshPateCFB please name one game where the opinions of Vegas had any bearing on the outcome of the game
@@JoshPateCFB If it "isn't completely accurate", define exactly why point spreads exist. Then explain exactly what causes point spreads to change when nothing has changed in regards to either team's personnel. The true answer to both questions confirm what I originally said is actually completely accurate.
I'm that guy Kevin who you replied to.
@ you are misunderstanding the generation of the line itself. Those numbers are based almost entirely on internal power rating numbers and only slightly adjusted for market release if at all.
It’s a good model. Almost all of top 25 make sense. People overvalue individual games and fail to grasp what the point is sometimes. Great season!
Illinois sucks.
Why not call it the fan duel poll?
When you have to make a video explaining something while passive aggressively saying "don't like it don't watch it" there is a good possibility that its not working, or JP stepped on lego and needs to lash out.
LOL, if you need to explain it every week, it's not a thing. Just let it go. Your poll is just not even accurate. Oh, right, it's not supposed to be accurate, It's the JP poll. It's just right. About what? Nothing. But EVERYTHING. Got it. The gaslighting , bro. Clown emoji sounds right. And your opinion of roster strength is just not predictive of anything except your bias. Oh, snap, I said it. Model is biased. It's deductive, you simply cannot argue that point. Plus, I'm just so much smarter than you. Respectfully.
Its purpose is to determine who is favored over who on a neutral field. It does its job most of true time in that regard. If you think the model is terrible and biased, you must think Vegas lines are terrible and biased, so you should be all over the Vegas lines
@NikolaiG8 yes, Vegas lines are designed to get people to gamble money in such a way that Vegas profits off the outcome, not predict how the game will go
It’s bias and not even accurate you say? Well isn’t over half of the top 10 at the beginning of the year still in the top 10 at the end of the year? Seems, dare I say it, pretty accurate
It would interesting to see a review on how the model performed last season as part of an episode.
I think the JP poll is fine for what it does.
What I don’t think is that the JP poll is ranking anything people are interested in. The majority of polls are focused on either what team would win against other teams or what teams have accomplished more on the field. The JP poll rates… what Vegas would put out for people to lose money gambling against them? I don’t think that’s necessarily reflective of what people look for in a top 25. Particularly given the amount of people getting sick of seeing betting and gambling take over coverage of sports in general.
Josh Pate Power Rate
Perhaps Bret Bielema should concentrate on making his team better than talking about his team being better?
He's been improving each year since he's been at ILL , I think he's making the team better
@@aaronlampkin284 fair enough! I'm happy when the Big 10 gets better
@@osagejon8972 Big Ten number 1
@@aaronlampkin284 👍
Bret always whines. Thanks for putting him in his place Josh. Glad you didn’t back down.
Look we know about how it works, we just disagree about who should be in there
The jp poll is lame
just say you still don't understand it
@@av8077just say you don't understand how betting lines are determined
Your lame
It’s just bait at this point. There is clearly an issue with the name if you constantly have to explain what it is.
If everybody misunderstands it that is not their issue it’s yours. Be a big man and rename it.
most people who watch the show for more than 2 minutes understand it just fine
@@av8077 ding ding ding
@@JoshPateCFBI regularly watch the show and understand it. But I also understand that if you call something a "poll" and compare it to the AP Poll each week, you shouldn't act surprised when people think it's a ranking. JP poll is due for a rebrand.
@@JoshPateCFBGambling lines aren't supposed to predict games, they're just supposed to entice enough people to bet on both sides.
@ this is a misrepresentation of what they actually are
Much love Josh. Seasons over and we already have seen how the season turned out. The poll is straight up silly. Maybe a game or two could go either way but someone will lost alot of money trying to bet against results we have already seen play out.
I love this show and know how search optimization works, but the fact is....Calling it the JP "Poll" is 100% CLICKBAIT.
You are DELIBERATELY LYING because you know "Poll" gives better algorithm results.
Yeah, everyone has to bow to the algorithm, but not with lies as bold faced as this.
(Again, love this show, but on this particular issue the only way to describe it is deceptive)
Love Josh but him not understanding that calling the power rating as a "poll" is total misinformation. There's no polling at all. It's like calling Kenpom a poll when it's a rating system.
I think the Jp poll should be renamed for the sake of relieving confusion.
Why is it called the JP Poll if Josh Pate isn't a voter, makes you wonder
I have watched your channel for years. I completely understand the purpose with your "poll", Neutral Field Favorability (NFF). However, just like with the service academies, it appears your model needs significant tweaking for undervaluing B1G mid-level teams. Maybe just bin it and start over. 😜
At least you recognize that "poll" is a misnomer. Maybe if you setup multiple NFF models and combine them as your ranking?
Love Brett!!! He is good for BIG and Football...
Good job Bret. JP acts like his poll is the true best top 25.
I understand how the poll works so I can't speak for anyone else. Personally I don't see a need for it given the various polls already available to fans. That being said it isn't my show so you do you.
You put so many teams that have too many faults from the same conference
You•
@ thanks did not catch that!
at this point jp. your going to have to host a poll on your website or something and combine everyone's polls. therefore no one can complain.
It might be advantageous to call this show what it really is. “Josh Pate’s Power 4 Football Show”
Love the content, but this isn’t a College Football show. Rarely are the other ~60-70 CFB programs referenced on this show. Occasionally just some shade thrown towards the highest 1 or 2 G5 programs about how irrelevant they are.
He talks about the important matchups, the vast majority of which are in the power 4.
@ I agree with that, but would still offer pushback. He talks about important matchups as it relates to the playoff. There are plenty of “important” matchups that don’t necessarily have playoff implications. There are 130+ FBS programs and he discusses roughly 20.
Just call it the Vegas poll because all you’re doing is seeing who’s favored and picking them, that poll belongs in the trash 😂😂
Yes in a sense he is misunderstanding the poll
But Illinois does call into question even the validity of the JP poll for what it is…
Wins over Michigan and South Carolina, only losses to Penn state, Minnesota, and oregon…feel like that would be top 25 neutral field
I just want to know how many times in a row Illinois would have to beat South Carolina before being ranked ahead of them in the JP Poll?
So a vegas poll essentially..
I think that the JP poll is useful if you know it's a power ranking. Josh Pate knew Florida was better than their record while I thought they were dead in the water.
ngl I clicked on the video and saw it was Bret Bielema and was disappointed in myself cause I should have guessed that it was gonna be the biggest 🤡 in the Big 10
Boy! The “you are what your record says you are mob is out in full force!”
You have Alabama at 8. Who in the hell would have Alabama favored against any top 25 team?
Here is a thought..? Do a whole show (again?) on the criteria used for the "model"..?? I watch your show, with a gmhifg degree of feequency.
Yes. Like Josh Pate said. If you don't like his power rating based JP Poll... You are free to go elsewhere. Or at least skip the video. lol.
Bielema is a 🤡 showed how classless he was during that bowl game. Kennard and Sanders absence made a massive impact. Illinois is a joke.
I like JP Power Tower of Neutral Site Odds. Crazy to me every week you have to explain the whole thing all over again, maybe it’s a sign of new viewers, but I’m afraid people are just dumb.
Looking at this poll a South Carolina did have their top running back that won a few games alone and top defensive player in the country didn’t play in last game so no problem with that. This poll is close to right.
So even here in the JP show hypotheticals mean more than the real games .....
Bret read "the card" wrong.
I live in Boise, I love BSU, they should not be favored against anyone in the top 25, unless UNLV was in the top 25. They stink.
I swear you explain it differently every time someone has an issue with it. And if it you disagree with the model with certain matchups, why title it the JP poll 😂.
I can't be the only one on board for the JP Poll click bait posts. LOL
Bielemas a joke anyway. Everyone saw that b.s. he pulled in the bowl game. He's a clown.
“Based on neutral field favorability” more like based on recruiting rankings which are skewed to make it look like the SEC brings in 300 4⭐️ players a cycle
Totally! And that fact gets proven every time the NFL draft comes around and...oh,. wait.
From the point of view of the recruiting sources, why would they skew the rankings? Maybe you can have a case and argument with ESPN but 247, Rivals, and On3 don’t have any stake in the SEC so there is no reason to promote them
@NikolaiG8do you really think scouts can fairly evaluate 1000s of players? They get lazy and just rank players based off the prestige of the schools that are recruiting them
He takes question to Tennessee being top 10 after playing Ohio State but not Oregon? Anti-SEC bias lol
All these college people can't even use good English! It is not "Must have came early," it is "must have come early"! Who cares about the objections? We'll see how it works out this fall.
Well you’re scary ass needs to stop making a Ranking and just call ya “Poll” a “JP Spread”
Did someone say JP Poll?!?
Rankings are what has happened
Ratings are what would or could or should happen
You understanding that you have to explain what this poll is week to week makes it “click bait” it’s cool tho good trying to dance around it tho
nah
As long as America's Golden Gophers crack the Top 25, it's alright with me.
But .. its not a projection.... Its not for next year... Its a final poll .. if a team beat another team at the end of the year that should mean more for the final poll than bettting odds........?.... The only person confused here is Josh.... Ill gladly explain if he'll have me on.....
@@chasejordan22 It’s not a poll. At least he’s not confused about that.
@@zplapplap
is that why it says final poll above and below it? is that why the video is called poll under attack? hmmm? strange...
@@chasejordan22 What’s your point? It’s not a poll, and Josh disclaims the veracity of calling it a poll. What are you missing?
@
he calls it a poll. a final poll at that... the season is over what else are you going to make? a go to fansided and see who is favored against who list? either make a final poll like you call it or make a projection for next year... this weird final projection non sense it just that... complete ignorance...
@@chasejordan22 It’s a misnomer that Pate addressed in this video and in prior videos. He’s sloppily created this definitional confusion. Words have meaning. It’s not a poll. My initial reply did not contemplate your taking issue with this. I wasn’t disagreeing with you. 😄
Learn the difference between merit and power ranking!
Is it bad I don’t even know who Brad Bielma is
Next year the BIG is your daddy again SEC.
Why not also post a ranking? Could undue some confusion
Bielema has a history of crying about things.
What's your favorite shoe brand Josh?
Yeah your JP poll if I gave it a rating would be B-
The only blabber more meaningless than preseason
Bret Bielema out kicked his coverage on March 10, 2012
Alabama at 8 is questionable
Yeah this poll is flawed. Gambling lines aren't supposed to be predictive
the poll is lame like his hair.. oh wait🤣
Don't worry Josh. Your original watchers get you. I just wanna know what flavor Zevia that is. 😂
Bama is the perfect example of why this "rating" isn't predictive. Gamblers still have faith in Bama and they still think they will win. BUT they don't. Point spreads are not predictive. I wonder if this account is shadow banned?
What’s your non fictional pole?
BOOMER!🙆🏻♀️🤷♀️
Your poll is dumb. You just need content.
Ignorance much?
@@ragmanintxwe know how it works, it's just dumb
@@ragmanintx You ok?
I thought was strictly about being lines, which don't necessarily favor the better team, but now Josh, you say thebetyer team doesn't always win-which is true, but at the sane time, sometimes the team we think are better, aren't actually better. That's where the field comes into the equation. No way on Earth South Carolina should be ranked that much higher than Illinois by ANY metric. Absolutely no way. Btw, you're the best, keep up the great work!
@@pigalow2002 it isn’t a ranking. And what you are arguing is indisputable - I literally provided the evidence from FanDuel. South Carolina would still be nearly a 10pt favorite vs Illinois if they played again.