Calculation of experimental variogram

Lectures by Platov Boris Viktorovich on the basics of Applied geostatistics.
You can learn more about the professional retraining program "Actual issues of geological modeling" at the courses of the Center for Additional Education, Quality Management and Marketing clicking the link: cdogeo.kpfu.ru/kursy/praktich... -geologicheskih-modelej/
Contact lecturer: [e-mail]
Learn more about the Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies of Kazan Federal University: geo.kpfu.ru
Director of the Center, Deputy Director of the Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies of KFU for Marketing: Chukmarov Ildus Adgamovich ([e-mail]).
Increase your efficiency, achieve more, manage the quality of your life: hq-diary.com (Quality Life Diary)
#CdoGEO
#IGPT
#IGiNGT

[@alamenabdalla6141]

For the first time, I was able to understand Geostatistics with this simple and easy picture. Thanks for your great effort

[@cdogeo]

Thank you for your feedback!)

[@theforester_]

thank you Professor. big greetings from Brazil

[@RohullahFaqiryar]

It was too useful and great lecture...
Thanks too much dear honorable teacher ...

[@user-zd9js8bn9z]

thank you so much, now I understand the concept, best regards

[@ahmedadnanaziz2005]

excellent tutorial

[@pidhojustinjordan3818]

Great tutorial. I am wondering why for h=1 you never considered point x=6 while counting N yet for higher values of h, like h=2, h=3, etc, you included the count (N) from point x=6

[@cdogeo]

It is because on the dataset in the point with coordinate X=6 there is no data.
It is for example if we do not have datapoints on any place.
In the calculations we did not include this point in every calculation. You can check it.

[@abdelkaderhouam3400]

Hi
For h = 4, my students found gamma(h) = 7.5
???

[@cdogeo]

Yes. 7.5 is correct answer for h=4

[@abdelkaderhouam3400]

@@cdogeo Thank you Prof.

[@felipen.493]

According to my calculations the γ(4) = 7.5