Hi, i found this talk really interesting, thanks for the clear descriptions. There are a few talks from this chap and i like the delivery and the fact he tackles things head on. I'm at the beginning of my journey learning about graphs and such, but this stuff is helpful
Found it biased, specially that you first talk about how things are "hacked" for RDF and then you attempt to "hack" Neo4j for Semantics. I get it, you are Neo4j and need to sell your product but try to sell your product where it should be sold! Neo4j is a wonderful product for what it is don't cloud it by trying to be things it is not.
A lot more on this topic and with a lot more detail in the goingmeta.live/ series. You'll find ontology-driven KG creation, inferencing, model validation, ontology learning... and much more! And all the code is available for you to try: github.com/jbarrasa/goingmeta
Wonderful introduction to a lot of concepts. Thanks!
Hi, i found this talk really interesting, thanks for the clear descriptions. There are a few talks from this chap and i like the delivery and the fact he tackles things head on. I'm at the beginning of my journey learning about graphs and such, but this stuff is helpful
Thank you for de-mystifying Neo4J, knowledge graphs, RDF and OWL. Very helpful!
"I think that 'semantics' can mean two things." I'm disappointed this brilliant line didn't get a laugh.
It can be a tough audience...glad you enjoyed ;-)
Found it biased, specially that you first talk about how things are "hacked" for RDF and then you attempt to "hack" Neo4j for Semantics. I get it, you are Neo4j and need to sell your product but try to sell your product where it should be sold! Neo4j is a wonderful product for what it is don't cloud it by trying to be things it is not.
A lot more on this topic and with a lot more detail in the goingmeta.live/ series. You'll find ontology-driven KG creation, inferencing, model validation, ontology learning... and much more! And all the code is available for you to try: github.com/jbarrasa/goingmeta