Thanks for the very helpful, no nonsense video. I have a large collection mainly from crate digging over the last 50 years. I have several hundred LPs, 45s and 78s waiting to be cleaned. Right now I use a DIY RCM based on the VPI wand. You and I have the same concern. My technique is to use a cotton makeup square to gently remove the first layer of dirt, then if needed do another wet and clean before vacuuming. I have worried about particles getting caught in the felt. I also have to be very careful to not get the labels wet. I'm thinking the Isonic would address both concerns. I've looked at cheaper models, but I think this is the best machine for my needs, especially because of the size of my collection. I had thought of going with a VPI or Pro-Ject, but they've gotten to be close to the same price. I'm about to clean the records I bought new over the last 60 years. I've been hesitant because of the concerns listed above. I think the Isonic would give me peace of mind I'm using the best method available.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Amazon just had a sale on the 5 unit model that's not that much more than the nicer Chinese eBay units. I did a lot of checking regarding the cleaner itself and looked at the record attachments. The Isonic record attachment makes the most sense to me. I went ahead and ordered the 5 record unit. I also added the extension unit for $50.00 and the separate 45 unit for $100.00. I still have tons of crate dig records to clean, plus I'm about to start to clean my core collection, the records I bought new starting in 1956. Thanks again for your review.
Thanks for the no-nonsense, no-audionervosa approach. I've used a VPI 16.0 (upgraded to 16.5) since 1982. My collection has been as big as 4,000 and currently around 2,400 but still digging and buying. The VPI is getting long in the tooth so looking to make a change.
Excellent review, right to the point without taking 2 hours like all the other ones on here! I think you convinced me this is the right ultrasonic for me, that 4875 II is around $800 now. So you don't have to do any wiping or additional surfactant removal process after they dry? This sounds like a one-step easy-peasy process which is almost too good to be true!
I have had my iSonic CS6.1-Pro for a month or so. Loving it! I have also been doing tests etc.. still. Question for you. Does it matter if you use distilled water or not. I have used both. My tap water does not leave spots, would you stick with that? Does stilled water aide in the actual cleaning? thanks! Mark
I think I have another video addressing this. I spoke with my isonic rep and he said tap water is fine if you have good city water. I haven’t used distilled in years. We did have well water when we moved and that didn’t work. It left spots, however the tap water we now use is great.
Thank you for the great video. Do you find the use of the heater to be a critical part of the ultrasonic cleaning process? Asking as the less expensive Isonic 4875-NH (non-heated?) appears not to have a heater based on the Amazon description, although the Isonic website description says it does... Thanks!
nice vid it convinced me to take the plunge and get one but now i have a question, i have a bad of those little spacers like the ones i can see lying at the side of your machine at 8:50, what are they for lol
Can it be used for cleaning other things? Can I remove the spinner and place some small metal/plastic parts in small metal containers in its bin and run the cleaner to remove oil and dirt from those parts? I'm thinking of buying it for my LPS and for cleaning my watch parts. Is it doable? Thanks!
Yes. It can be used for other things. I would recommend finding out what the cavitation is you need for your other things vs one set for records. I suspect it will be fine but I’d still check.
Thank you and big shouts from the UK. Just bought the cheaper Chinese version and looking forward to using it . Will be over in October so will get my record order in soon
Just bought one and love it. After the first batch of 5 records the water is cloudy. Have you run into that??? Also, about how many cleanings do you get out of a batch of water. In other words how often do you change it?? Do you filter it and re-use or just dump it and start with fresh distilled water??
It depends. Use a warm Damp soft cloth like a diaper first, circle both ways. If any grit rinse in sink first. Or you can use a steamer (like for clothes) first. Or both. I always wash like this and use spin clean before ultrasound. Also, a little diluted alcohol for grease. A lot of used records have grease on them. I have found that you need at least an inch between records. But 10 records often involves enough dirt to require a change.
Curious if you have purchased or hear about P4875II+MVR10-Pro with Spin Drying. Is it worth it to get the one with Spin Drying? I am assuming you have to drain the tank when using the spin dry, so is it worth it?? thanks for the video! Mark
@@markroberts2406 when I typed that I thought it might have done 10, but i Haven’t looked at it in a while. It’s seems like quite a hassle. If I remember you have to change the top as well and something else about the spindle. Again, it’s been a while. I was super excited when I heard they had something, then super sad when I saw it.
I have watched this video numerous times. Thanks for all the insight. I ended up purchasing the iSonic CS6.1-Pro. It's the updated version and can be found on Amazon. One thing that I am having is the outer grooves, some solution or residue is left. Have you had this issue? I know you are just taking the records out and letting them dry. Do you have do any wiping afterwards? iSonic recommended using just a 1/2 of solution, but I am still having some reside on the out side groove. Curious what you think, please?
It’s either water staining or soap scum. Are you using their blue soap? How much? Are you putting the soap in last after the water? And what kind of water are you using. I see water rings if I use tap water but rarely if I use distilled water.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 I am using distilled water and using their blue soap. I have since used just a 1/2 cap full. It helped but the rings are still there.
@@markroberts2406 do they wipe off with a microfiber towel? Are they just in the dead wax? Although, guess that depends on the record. I tend to fill My baths way up to the edge of the spacers and sometimes above the spacers. I realize they’re getting wet, but they have o-rings so I don’t worry about the labels getting wet. Is it on all records or just occasionally? Im also wondering if the ring are caused by what’s left on the record and not what the cleaner has done. It’s probably water spotting though. You can try drying them faster and see if that helps.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 They wipe off with the microfiber cloth, but its a pain. I am doing a few tests. Doing one cleaning with just tap water and then 1/2 cap full of solution. I will see what I get. Then I will do one with just distilled water NO cleaner. This is happening on the outer groves mainly. I will keep you posted. thanks!
@@markroberts2406 if it’s on the outer grooves, your drying time is too slow. The water that is left on the records is pooling on the bottom and leaving the residue behind. I actually use 2 heaters above and beside my drying racks to help because our shop is not attached to the house and in the winter it is cold out there! I also flip the records every 5 minutes and tap the bottom on a clean cloth so it soaks up that pooled water. I also have clean towels under my racks that the bottom of the records just barely rest on to help collection that pooling. Hope this helps!
I'm looking to order this same unit and I'm hoping you can drop a list here of what I need and what you recommend I purchase so I'm ready to go when it arrives. I love your vids. They have helped so much. Cheers
@@derekpresnail9703 it’s not necessary. I don’t even use distilled water baths anymore. Please understand that I clean thousands of records and have tried all the tricks and tips. Per my isonic sales rep - if you have decent filtered city water you don’t need distilled. I was using well water for a few months when we moved to AZ, but it’s pretty hard water here and I quickly got a mineral deposit along the edge of one of my baths, so I stopped using well water. It cleaned fine and didn’t have any issues, other than I would get water spots in the dead wax.
Hi. I have seen an Isonic package that includes a cover to spin dry records. Is that reliable or is it a waste of money? I am gokng go buy an Isonic, but wanted to check this first,
@@joseauger1353 I had to look that up to find it. It must be a new product. I trust isonic completely, since they’ve been in business for 30+ years, but I have questions about that drying appliance. I don’t know how it dries when the records are always 50% submerged?
@@joseauger1353 just watched the video. So you have to drain the water and spin the 10 records….I’d probably pass and just let them air dry. As long as you’re not drying them in a sandstorm or in a dirty/windy environment they should be fine.
I watched some Kirmuss videos, at least as much of them as I could stomach. I see why Fremer would fall for his baloney. If it is way too expensive and full of pseudo-science baloney, Fremer will fall for it every time. The Kirmuss system is really fiddly and time consuming. He makes a bunch of incorrect assumptions. I saw a forum where Isonic addressed his criticisms in a polite but firm way.
Isonic is a cool company and I generally try to keep my focus for customer and like minded business professionals. But this is one bridge I loved to burn. Kirmuss comments on my videos ALL the time. I just delete them. Same drivel that’s in his videos. Still ghosts me when I ask him for a side by side comparison.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 on a happier note my Isonic arrived yesterday and I did my first batch of records this morning (will teleworking ;-)). I'm very favorably impressed with the design and build quality. I'm also impressed with the preliminary results. More experimentation and testing needs to be done. I did a batch of 5 LPs, 5 78s and 10 45s. I used the 45 adapter for them. My subjective opinion is that it is at least as good as my vacuum RCM for LPs and 78s, but was noticeably better with the 45s. These 45s were in average shape and unsleeved when bought. They really cleaned up well. There was no background noise and the detail in the music was excellent.
Hi, great review of the Isonic and interesting comments about the Kirmuss. The Kirmuss uses a Chinese base and Kirmuss own design motor top. Kirmuss' procedure is super cumbersome. He claims they change the internals of the base unit, which from what i have seen they don't, its same frequencies etc. One thing i did notice with the Kirmuss was that if you use it for the total time they recommend with the heater on, some records may have slight edge warpage seemingly caused by the Kitmuss' drive unit. The Kirmuss does not protect the records label. The Isonic i have seen here in Australia also uses a Chinese base, looks like the one you have. The base units are fine, i have the same base unit that Kirmuss uses supplied by the Chinese manufacturer, have cleaned my 12,000 records with it and it still works perfectly. I did change the frequency transducers and circuits to a better range and also made some changes inside the tank, which did reduce the number of records to 8 because it needed more space between the records for my mods, which improve it and take care of the one thing all ultrasonics have probs with, fingerprints. My mod takes away the scrubbing required to get rid of fingerprints and inground dirt. You are right about ultrasonics being the best, as for Kirmuss, well, i agree with you. I have tested mine in original and mod form against the Kirmuss, and in modified form it was way more superior. It even beat out the single record KL and Audio Desk which cost around 5kaud in Australia. The Kirmuss is about 3,500aud here, my beast is hitting market at 1,500aud. Sorry for being so long winded. ............enjoy the music
Interesting. I’d love to see yours in action. I’ll be in the market for a second one in a few months, maybe sooner. I agree that with high heat you can get some cupping on lesser quality records, which is another reason I don’t generally use the heater. What did you do to get it to remover the fingerprints? That’s a huge upgrade for all ultrasonic machines.
@ 130 degrees is roughly the temperature you’re speaking of. Direct heat, not ambient. I have these experiments on my channel. However, I have had cheap vinyl come out cupped from an ultrasonic bath that did not go back to shape. I had to put them in my orb to get them back to flat. It’s extremely rare, but it does happen.
@ Full information will be available soon. Running tests using our unit as well as10 litre tub unit On our complete unit we are changing the transducers and circuits to 80khz. Have found 80khz to be quieter, not as hot and cleans better, but makes it more expensive. There is also a belief that 80khz is gentler on the record. So far our tests have shown the proprietary cleaning mods do work and give a much better cleaning effect. I will be making it available as a kit to fit 6 and 10 litre tubs as well as the Isonic type units. The unit has been delayed a little because of death in family, selling house, and getting ready for shift.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Your views to comments does not make that a viable solution. As a library I read, but people come to TH-cam for a reason and its not reading.
![[DRIP] ‘Woke Up In Tokyo (RUKA & ASA)’ PREVIEW](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QN44lcR_VkI/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for the very helpful, no nonsense video. I have a large collection mainly from crate digging over the last 50 years. I have several hundred LPs, 45s and 78s waiting to be cleaned. Right now I use a DIY RCM based on the VPI wand.
You and I have the same concern. My technique is to use a cotton makeup square to gently remove the first layer of dirt, then if needed do another wet and clean before vacuuming. I have worried about particles getting caught in the felt. I also have to be very careful to not get the labels wet. I'm thinking the Isonic would address both concerns.
I've looked at cheaper models, but I think this is the best machine for my needs, especially because of the size of my collection. I had thought of going with a VPI or Pro-Ject, but they've gotten to be close to the same price. I'm about to clean the records I bought new over the last 60 years. I've been hesitant because of the concerns listed above. I think the Isonic would give me peace of mind I'm using the best method available.
The Chinese ones on eBay work great. They only clean 6 at a time, but they are workhorses and a whole lot cheaper.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Amazon just had a sale on the 5 unit model that's not that much more than the nicer Chinese eBay units. I did a lot of checking regarding the cleaner itself and looked at the record attachments. The Isonic record attachment makes the most sense to me. I went ahead and ordered the 5 record unit. I also added the extension unit for $50.00 and the separate 45 unit for $100.00. I still have tons of crate dig records to clean, plus I'm about to start to clean my core collection, the records I bought new starting in 1956. Thanks again for your review.
Thanks for the no-nonsense, no-audionervosa approach. I've used a VPI 16.0 (upgraded to 16.5) since 1982. My collection has been as big as 4,000 and currently around 2,400 but still digging and buying. The VPI is getting long in the tooth so looking to make a change.
Trust me, any ultrasonic machine will do a better job than a VPI.
Excellent review, right to the point without taking 2 hours like all the other ones on here! I think you convinced me this is the right ultrasonic for me, that 4875 II is around $800 now. So you don't have to do any wiping or additional surfactant removal process after they dry? This sounds like a one-step easy-peasy process which is almost too good to be true!
I have had my iSonic CS6.1-Pro for a month or so. Loving it! I have also been doing tests etc.. still. Question for you. Does it matter if you use distilled water or not. I have used both. My tap water does not leave spots, would you stick with that? Does stilled water aide in the actual cleaning? thanks! Mark
I think I have another video addressing this. I spoke with my isonic rep and he said tap water is fine if you have good city water. I haven’t used distilled in years. We did have well water when we moved and that didn’t work. It left spots, however the tap water we now use is great.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 awesome! Thanks for the fast reply!
It surprises me how the ultrasonic waves get to the vinyl when there is such a small distance between each record.
same thought here.....
Thank you for the great video.
Do you find the use of the heater to be a critical part of the ultrasonic cleaning process? Asking as the less expensive Isonic 4875-NH (non-heated?) appears not to have a heater based on the Amazon description, although the Isonic website description says it does... Thanks!
No. I don’t use my heaters. They take FOREVER to heat up anything.
nice vid it convinced me to take the plunge and get one but now i have a question, i have a bad of those little spacers like the ones i can see lying at the side of your machine at 8:50, what are they for lol
@@davidferris-ss9rc if you try to wash less than 10 records, the end cap will be loose so those are spacers
@@spatulacityrecords6263 great stuff thanks
Can it be used for cleaning other things? Can I remove the spinner and place some small metal/plastic parts in small metal containers in its bin and run the cleaner to remove oil and dirt from those parts? I'm thinking of buying it for my LPS and for cleaning my watch parts. Is it doable? Thanks!
Yes. It can be used for other things. I would recommend finding out what the cavitation is you need for your other things vs one set for records. I suspect it will be fine but I’d still check.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Thank you!!
Thanks for this no-nonsense video. I just followed your recommendation and bought a Chinese ultra sonic machine. What
Thank you and big shouts from the UK. Just bought the cheaper Chinese version and looking forward to using it . Will be over in October so will get my record order in soon
LOL My spindle holes are worn from playing them….
The 5 record version of this Isonic is going for about $650 on Amazon, it’s on my short list.
Just bought one and love it. After the first batch of 5 records the water is cloudy. Have you run into that??? Also, about how many cleanings do you get out of a batch of water. In other words how often do you change it?? Do you filter it and re-use or just dump it and start with fresh distilled water??
It depends. Use a warm Damp soft cloth like a diaper first, circle both ways. If any grit rinse in sink first. Or you can use a steamer (like for clothes) first. Or both. I always wash like this and use spin clean before ultrasound. Also, a little diluted alcohol for grease. A lot of used records have grease on them.
I have found that you need at least an inch between records.
But 10 records often involves enough dirt to require a change.
Curious if you have purchased or hear about P4875II+MVR10-Pro with Spin Drying. Is it worth it to get the one with Spin Drying? I am assuming you have to drain the tank when using the spin dry, so is it worth it?? thanks for the video! Mark
I looked at it, but it’s about useless to me because it only dries one record at a time.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 It actually does do 10 records at a time... but you have to drain the tank etc.. thanks for the fast reply!
@@markroberts2406 when I typed that I thought it might have done 10, but i Haven’t looked at it in a while. It’s seems like quite a hassle. If I remember you have to change the top as well and something else about the spindle. Again, it’s been a while. I was super excited when I heard they had something, then super sad when I saw it.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Thanks for the video and reply!
I have watched this video numerous times. Thanks for all the insight. I ended up purchasing the iSonic CS6.1-Pro. It's the updated version and can be found on Amazon. One thing that I am having is the outer grooves, some solution or residue is left. Have you had this issue? I know you are just taking the records out and letting them dry. Do you have do any wiping afterwards? iSonic recommended using just a 1/2 of solution, but I am still having some reside on the out side groove. Curious what you think, please?
It’s either water staining or soap scum. Are you using their blue soap? How much? Are you putting the soap in last after the water? And what kind of water are you using. I see water rings if I use tap water but rarely if I use distilled water.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 I am using distilled water and using their blue soap. I have since used just a 1/2 cap full. It helped but the rings are still there.
@@markroberts2406 do they wipe off with a microfiber towel? Are they just in the dead wax? Although, guess that depends on the record. I tend to fill
My baths way up to the edge of the spacers and sometimes above the spacers. I realize they’re getting wet, but they have o-rings so I don’t worry about the labels getting wet. Is it on all records or just occasionally? Im also wondering if the ring are caused by what’s left on the record and not what the cleaner has done. It’s probably water spotting though. You can try drying them faster and see if that helps.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 They wipe off with the microfiber cloth, but its a pain. I am doing a few tests. Doing one cleaning with just tap water and then 1/2 cap full of solution. I will see what I get. Then I will do one with just distilled water NO cleaner. This is happening on the outer groves mainly. I will keep you posted. thanks!
@@markroberts2406 if it’s on the outer grooves, your drying time is too slow. The water that is left on the records is pooling on the bottom and leaving the residue behind. I actually use 2 heaters above and beside my drying racks to help because our shop is not attached to the house and in the winter it is cold out there! I also flip the records every 5 minutes and tap the bottom on a clean cloth so it soaks up that pooled water. I also have clean towels under my racks that the bottom of the records just barely rest on to help collection that pooling. Hope this helps!
I'm looking to order this same unit and I'm hoping you can drop a list here of what I need and what you recommend I purchase so I'm ready to go when it arrives. I love your vids. They have helped so much.
Cheers
The only thing you need outside the isonic is soap and some sort of drying rack. I only use the detergent they sell.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 is the soap the jewelry eyeglass liquid?
@@sethmarquard5517 no. It’s the isonic vinyl record detergent. It’s blue. Are you ordering from the isonic website?
@@spatulacityrecords6263 no I am ordering thru Amazon. I believe it's shipped from the manufacturer not Amazon
@@sethmarquard5517 I believe it’s cheaper from the manufacturer. The only place to get the soap is thru them I believe
Do you rinse the records with plain distilled water after they come out of the US bath? Or just let them dry straight from the cleaner?
I do not rinse
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Do you feel like that step is not necessary or worth the time for benefit? Or a bit of both?
@@derekpresnail9703 it’s not necessary. I don’t even use distilled water baths anymore. Please understand that I clean thousands of records and have tried all the tricks and tips. Per my isonic sales rep - if you have decent filtered city water you don’t need distilled. I was using well water for a few months when we moved to AZ, but it’s pretty hard water here and I quickly got a mineral deposit along the edge of one of my baths, so I stopped using well water. It cleaned fine and didn’t have any issues, other than I would get water spots in the dead wax.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Nice, thank you for sharing your experience.
Thanks for all the info, have just ordered one for my shop. At what point do you add cleaner and do you rinse after cleaning ?
Thanks.
Do NOT add the cleaner first or it will be a bubble bath. After detergent, degas, and you’re ready to go. I do not rinse.
Hi. I have seen an Isonic package that includes a cover to spin dry records. Is that reliable or is it a waste of money? I am gokng go buy an Isonic, but wanted to check this first,
That must be a new edition to their package. I’ve never seen it. I would bet it works great, but is it just for one record?
It is for 10 records.
@@joseauger1353 I had to look that up to find it. It must be a new product. I trust isonic completely, since they’ve been in business for 30+ years, but I have questions about that drying appliance. I don’t know how it dries when the records are always 50% submerged?
@@joseauger1353 just watched the video. So you have to drain the water and spin the 10 records….I’d probably pass and just let them air dry. As long as you’re not drying them in a sandstorm or in a dirty/windy environment they should be fine.
Ok. Thanks for your advice. Will buy the one without the soin dry attachment.
Sorry to bother you again. I saw two different models in Amazon. One is the P4875ii and the other is the P4875-NH. Do you know what is the difference?
Probably the accessories that come with it or how many records the spindle will hold. Not sure. They have a website.
I believe that the NH stands for No Heat. If cleaning vinyl records, I would go for the unit that doesn't have heat.
I believe the kirmuss is around $1k.
When I looked prior to doing this video it was over 3k
I might have been looking at the audio desk or whatever it’s called
The Kirmuss is $970. The Audio Desk Pro is $4499!
Get your facts straight
After the ultra bath do you use your rcm to vacuum the records dry?
No. That would introduce dust and crap that is on the vacuum and the bottom of the mat. I let them air dry
restored records as they repell water do not need air or vacuum drying.
I watched some Kirmuss videos, at least as much of them as I could stomach. I see why Fremer would fall for his baloney. If it is way too expensive and full of pseudo-science baloney, Fremer will fall for it every time.
The Kirmuss system is really fiddly and time consuming. He makes a bunch of incorrect assumptions. I saw a forum where Isonic addressed his criticisms in a polite but firm way.
Isonic is a cool company and I generally try to keep my focus for customer and like minded business professionals. But this is one bridge I loved to burn. Kirmuss comments on my videos ALL the time. I just delete them. Same drivel that’s in his videos. Still ghosts me when I ask him for a side by side comparison.
@@spatulacityrecords6263 on a happier note my Isonic arrived yesterday and I did my first batch of records this morning (will teleworking ;-)).
I'm very favorably impressed with the design and build quality. I'm also impressed with the preliminary results. More experimentation and testing needs to be done.
I did a batch of 5 LPs, 5 78s and 10 45s. I used the 45 adapter for them. My subjective opinion is that it is at least as good as my vacuum RCM for LPs and 78s, but was noticeably better with the 45s. These 45s were in average shape and unsleeved when bought. They really cleaned up well. There was no background noise and the detail in the music was excellent.
Hi, great review of the Isonic and interesting comments about the Kirmuss. The Kirmuss uses a Chinese base and Kirmuss own design motor top. Kirmuss' procedure is super cumbersome. He claims they change the internals of the base unit, which from what i have seen they don't, its same frequencies etc. One thing i did notice with the Kirmuss was that if you use it for the total time they recommend with the heater on, some records may have slight edge warpage seemingly caused by the Kitmuss' drive unit. The Kirmuss does not protect the records label. The Isonic i have seen here in Australia also uses a Chinese base, looks like the one you have. The base units are fine, i have the same base unit that Kirmuss uses supplied by the Chinese manufacturer, have cleaned my 12,000 records with it and it still works perfectly. I did change the frequency transducers and circuits to a better range and also made some changes inside the tank, which did reduce the number of records to 8 because it needed more space between the records for my mods, which improve it and take care of the one thing all ultrasonics have probs with, fingerprints. My mod takes away the scrubbing required to get rid of fingerprints and inground dirt. You are right about ultrasonics being the best, as for Kirmuss, well, i agree with you. I have tested mine in original and mod form against the Kirmuss, and in modified form it was way more superior. It even beat out the single record KL and Audio Desk which cost around 5kaud in Australia. The Kirmuss is about 3,500aud here, my beast is hitting market at 1,500aud. Sorry for being so long winded. ............enjoy the music
Interesting. I’d love to see yours in action. I’ll be in the market for a second one in a few months, maybe sooner. I agree that with high heat you can get some cupping on lesser quality records, which is another reason I don’t generally use the heater. What did you do to get it to remover the fingerprints? That’s a huge upgrade for all ultrasonic machines.
You should do a video showing your mod. Be very interesting to watch. If you do, please post a link here. Thanks.
@@dmsaudio i will as soon as its ready.
@ 130 degrees is roughly the temperature you’re speaking of. Direct heat, not ambient. I have these experiments on my channel. However, I have had cheap vinyl come out cupped from an ultrasonic bath that did not go back to shape. I had to put them in my orb to get them back to flat. It’s extremely rare, but it does happen.
@ Full information will be available soon. Running tests using our unit as well as10 litre tub unit On our complete unit we are changing the transducers and circuits to 80khz. Have found 80khz to be quieter, not as hot and cleans better, but makes it more expensive. There is also a belief that 80khz is gentler on the record. So far our tests have shown the proprietary cleaning mods do work and give a much better cleaning effect. I will be making it available as a kit to fit 6 and 10 litre tubs as well as the Isonic type units. The unit has been delayed a little because of death in family, selling house, and getting ready for shift.
You can find the kirmuss online for $899+. A 10 oz replacement bottle of his magic cleaner is $85!!! lol
I screwed that up. The audio desk is the $3500
@Mr Schmeltz good to know. The isonic is a beast and really vibrates it around but no splashing
@@spatulacityrecords6263 yes you did, you should edit that portion with a little text explaining your mistake.
@@whittierlibrarybookstore3708 or you can read the comments…
@@spatulacityrecords6263 Your views to comments does not make that a viable solution. As a library I read, but people come to TH-cam for a reason and its not reading.
Like the wisdom but @11.30 is what I needed to hear.
How do you really feel???LMAO!!!