What’s makes this scene so haunting is how as soon as Treebeard trails off, the music just…stops. All you hear is the silence of wind passing over the remnants of the forest
I love how, in the extended edition, the trees come to Helm’s Deep and absolutely ANNIHILATE the remaining Uruk-Hai. 😂 all you see is the trees shaking like the wind is blowing and all you hear is the creaking of wood and screams and shrieks of dying Orcs. 😂😂
You need to do the full fight with the Ent's. I'd watch an hour long version if this if it was the whole thing, cause admittedly this was like blue balls of the scene
I actually hate that everyone gets excited for the Ents as if they haven't actually been listening. Even if you don't know the entwives have been missing for thousands of years it's pretty heavily insinuated that there aren't many left and when he says it's likely they go to their doom he means the extinction of the Ents. Hence the last march of the Ents.
Another bit of Peter Jackson's obsession with degrading Tolkien's characters in the name of cheap drama. The ents *never* decided to ignore the war; at the entmoot they chose to go to war with Saruman, and marched off to Isengard immediately. They knew they had a duty, and kept it. Jackson unnecessarily sullied the characters of Aragorn, Frodo, Boromir, Treebeard and the ents, Faramir, Denethor, Theoden, and Isildur. He turned Gimli and Pippin into comic relief. He turned Arwen into a warrior girlboss. All for melodrama. These compilations show he was effective at jerking emotions, but it still feels like somewhat disgusting character assassination.
Never thought I would hear one of the most awarded and successful movie trilogies of all-time, get maligned as “disgusting character assassination” and “cheap emotions” and “melodrama”. I’m curious what you would consider a *good* movie then.😂
Someone doesn't understand that movies and books are different media and the audiences are different. There's a reason Peter Jackson made the changes. You gotta condense that book into a 3 hour movie while also making it exciting and captivating for people that don't know anything about the story.
@@ThetrueKidGoku 1. It's not a 3 hour movie, it's *three nearly four-hour movies.* 2. You support my argument; the changes were made to capture large audiences with excitement, *not* to make an accurate adaptation. Pandering to the normies is not the dunk you seem to think. Show me the excitement, cringe humor, and girlboss romance in, say, "2001: A Space Odyssey" (or argue that it's not a great adaptation). Jackson's movies look and feel like Tolkien in their execution, but the story is pure Hollywood schlock, which got *much* worse in the Hobbit debacle. The absolutely *terrible* state of the entertainment industry now does not make your rose-colored glasses any clearer.
@@davidkulmaczewski4911 I can agree the Hobbit films were complete shite in comparison (Warner Bros. execs cannot keep their grubby fingers out of their own productions and just let people do their damn jobs) but I heartily disagree that Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings was full of “cringe humor” and “girlboss romance” (if that’s what you’re trying to imply). If your threshold for that stuff is THAT low, you must have stopped consuming media entirely for many years now due to how much things have deteriorated since then. The state of Hollywood, TV, and just media in general today has gotten *exponentially* worse across the board since 2001 (the year, not the movie).
0:03 Wadumin www.youtube.com/@wadumin
1:25 Magic Magy www.youtube.com/@MagicMagy
2:40 EOM Reacts www.youtube.com/@EOMReacts
3:36 The Media Knights www.youtube.com/@OfficialMediaKnights
4:50 The Octobers www.youtube.com/@TheOctobersReact
5:56 Addie Counts www.youtube.com/@AddieCounts
6:42 Raggedy Pack www.youtube.com/@RaggedyPack
8:11 Rob Squad Movie Reactions www.youtube.com/@robsquadmoviereactions
9:06 Popcorn In Bed www.youtube.com/@PopcornInBed
9:53 Spartan & Pudgey www.youtube.com/@SpartanandPudgey
10:35 Mentally Gone Reacts www.youtube.com/@mentallygonereacts
11:38 JUST TRUST ASH www.youtube.com/@justtrustash
12:04 IT'S MR. VIDEO www.youtube.com/@ITSMRVIDEO-rg9ms
12:53 Diegesis www.youtube.com/@Diegesis
13:33 ANGELINA www.youtube.com/@ANGELINAA
14:10 Cinema Gek www.youtube.com/@CinemaGek
14:58 The Perfect Mix www.youtube.com/@theperfectmixx
15:21 Pop Culturally Challenged www.youtube.com/@popculturallychallenged
The way Treebeard says "SARUMAN...." gives me chills, like my mans is PISSED
“There is no curse in Elvish, Entish, or the tongues of Men for this treachery.”
~Treebeard
Yeah, “pissed” is an understatement.
Reactors when the Ents start walking: They're walking too slow, don't know if they will get there in time.
Ents: We'll get there when we get there.
I feel like they ignore that each step covers like fifty feet at a time, lol
"An Ent is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to"
@@TheHiddenDirector Yeah, these Ents are long striders.
@@oldschool5317 Tea time.
"Even the trees walked in this movie-" Randall
😅
“with a ROCK AND STONE” goes so hard
What’s makes this scene so haunting is how as soon as Treebeard trails off, the music just…stops. All you hear is the silence of wind passing over the remnants of the forest
Everyone: Oh, the trees!
Me: They're not trees, God damnit!
“They had voices of their own…”
You can feel how heartbroken Treebeard is.
I love how, in the extended edition, the trees come to Helm’s Deep and absolutely ANNIHILATE the remaining Uruk-Hai. 😂 all you see is the trees shaking like the wind is blowing and all you hear is the creaking of wood and screams and shrieks of dying Orcs. 😂😂
I really like the Ents in The Lord of the Rings
The actor who played Gimli the dwarf also voiced Treebeard
I come back to watch that part of the movie for the music alone. It is that good.
Saruman learned the hard way about... TREE LAW!
You know you royally effed up big time when the trees are coming after you 😮
.. we lost the Ents wives!! ... Oh.. that trees were my friends .. the last march of the Ents
At least there isn't some random dude in the corner.
I love when i look for something on youtube and find exactly what iwas looking for.
Treebeard’s shout of anguish and rage still makes me cry a little it’s as though a father came home to see his family murdered
You need to do the full fight with the Ent's. I'd watch an hour long version if this if it was the whole thing, cause admittedly this was like blue balls of the scene
Agreed
Loved this scene
Run, forest. Run!
I actually hate that everyone gets excited for the Ents as if they haven't actually been listening. Even if you don't know the entwives have been missing for thousands of years it's pretty heavily insinuated that there aren't many left and when he says it's likely they go to their doom he means the extinction of the Ents. Hence the last march of the Ents.
Though we may go to our doom. The world will remember the last March of the Ents.
OMFG even Jeffrey Dahmer reacts to LOTR!
😂😂😂😂👍👍
well, you cut out the most epic part of this scene
Another bit of Peter Jackson's obsession with degrading Tolkien's characters in the name of cheap drama. The ents *never* decided to ignore the war; at the entmoot they chose to go to war with Saruman, and marched off to Isengard immediately. They knew they had a duty, and kept it.
Jackson unnecessarily sullied the characters of Aragorn, Frodo, Boromir, Treebeard and the ents, Faramir, Denethor, Theoden, and Isildur. He turned Gimli and Pippin into comic relief. He turned Arwen into a warrior girlboss. All for melodrama. These compilations show he was effective at jerking emotions, but it still feels like somewhat disgusting character assassination.
Never thought I would hear one of the most awarded and successful movie trilogies of all-time, get maligned as “disgusting character assassination” and “cheap emotions” and “melodrama”. I’m curious what you would consider a *good* movie then.😂
@@n7sorcerer419 You can have an excellent film that is still a poor adaptation of the source material.
Someone doesn't understand that movies and books are different media and the audiences are different. There's a reason Peter Jackson made the changes. You gotta condense that book into a 3 hour movie while also making it exciting and captivating for people that don't know anything about the story.
@@ThetrueKidGoku 1. It's not a 3 hour movie, it's *three nearly four-hour movies.*
2. You support my argument; the changes were made to capture large audiences with excitement, *not* to make an accurate adaptation. Pandering to the normies is not the dunk you seem to think.
Show me the excitement, cringe humor, and girlboss romance in, say, "2001: A Space Odyssey" (or argue that it's not a great adaptation). Jackson's movies look and feel like Tolkien in their execution, but the story is pure Hollywood schlock, which got *much* worse in the Hobbit debacle. The absolutely *terrible* state of the entertainment industry now does not make your rose-colored glasses any clearer.
@@davidkulmaczewski4911 I can agree the Hobbit films were complete shite in comparison (Warner Bros. execs cannot keep their grubby fingers out of their own productions and just let people do their damn jobs) but I heartily disagree that Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings was full of “cringe humor” and “girlboss romance” (if that’s what you’re trying to imply). If your threshold for that stuff is THAT low, you must have stopped consuming media entirely for many years now due to how much things have deteriorated since then. The state of Hollywood, TV, and just media in general today has gotten *exponentially* worse across the board since 2001 (the year, not the movie).