WOW, lots of gems in this talk. I've seen the graph at 40:00 for real-part = 1/2 in several other youtube videos and have always wondered what it would look like at something not exactly 1/2 and here we have it !!!
When you get a call from an unidentified number you can say "I will pick the call if and only if it is a prime number", what is hard, is to do so before the call finishes.
Watching the presentation I was like struck by lightning at 59:08, as 5 is not the first prime "of interest", but 3! I never realized, that the Clarke transform is linked to the Riemann Hypothesis in this way!
I understand the quartets (like 101, 103, 107, 109) as occuring when the more significant figures don't add up to a sum divisible by 3, together with the 1, 3, 7 and 9 that all prime numbers must have as their least significant figure. If the figures of a number adds up to a number divisible by 3, then that number itself is divisible by 3.
When identifying the squares vector, when do we stop? In the case of P=5 we stop at 4, P=7 at 9. Is it, that we stop when an identified square is hit again? P=5: 4, 9; P=7: 9,16 ?
As I do not really understand the consequences of the vectors addition as shown at 59:08, I may ask: what if we substract all vectors first and then add the square vectors two times? As all vectors, starting from 0 end up in a complete way round, can't the target be reached by adding the square vectors only?
From every row of Pascal triangle deduce 1-2-1=-2, 1-3-3+1=-4, 1-4-6+4-1=-6, 1-5-10+10-5+1=-8.....etc all trivial zero of zeta function, have such pattern from(x-1)^n of Pascal triangle, flip -,+ sign from 3rd term on.
Can the faulty arithmetic of 9/11 be examined here ? Three thousand missing bodies seemed to totally eliminate any credibility of a building collapses theory given that no other examples exist in world history of such a low rate of recovery. Twenty five years hasn’t given us another example either . Add to that the fact it happened twice on the same day to two identical buildings at the same location and it certainly looks impossible.
WOW I can't believe it! In Dec 2017 I did a TH-cam video titled 'Fermat's Last Theorem : 125=126' and now I find it confirmed by Prof Brian Conrey and the GREAT Carl Freidrich Gauss no less who got 125 and 126 respectively for one of their sums of the same data at 21 minutes into the video.
The slide actually says complex zeros which in this context is another way to refer to the non trivial (or symmetric) zeros of zeta. The other (trivial) zeros that you mention are purely real and arise from the other factors of the functional equation, namely the gamma factors, so they are not symmetric zeros of zeta.
If another aspect of POV is to use Euler's implied symbolically connected inference in the projection-drawing picture-plane, on the Blackboard that is, how effectively the innate "whole message" of logarithmic condensation-coordination vanishing-into-no-thing Singularity-point positioning is exposed to view depends on the assembly of functional abstractions shown us by our Teachers. Eg if we are familiar with the entangled connection of Absolute Zero-infinity reference-framing containment positioning NOW of/by i-reflection Singularity-point, the expectation is that all potential positioning possibilities are contained, recognisable within the holography dimensionality of e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity sync-duration, represented by the Unit Circle of Infinity @.dt instantaneously. But the Mathologer's and 3BLUE 1BROWN Students know how to speak the million dollar language, to qualify.
The answer to the Riemann Hypothesis is Infinity. Infinity times infinity equals infinity to the power of infinity. Infinity squared equals infinity to the power of infinity. If 2 is a prime then so is infinity. You are all welcome.
This is so tedious. If he cut out all the umms and aahs, it would probably be at least 10% shorter. If you can't present something in a concise and/or interesting manner, stop clogging up the internet!
"... the list of primes goes on forever ..." According to Edward Fredkin, infinities, infinitesimals, perfectly continuous functions, and local sources of randomness are figments of human imagination and do not occur in nature. I conjecture that the Riemann Hypothesis is true but unprovable in ZFC, but ZFC and Peano Arithmetic are contrary to empirical existence. There is a saying on Wall Street: Trees do not grow to the sky. Do an arbitrarily large number of positive integers occur in nature? Consider some conjectures: (1) There are three fundamental levels of physics: classical field theory, quantum field theory, & string theory, (2) There exist positive integers W, X, Y, & Z - each greater than 1 and less than 10,000 - such that the amount of classical information is < W^X, the amount of quantum information is < Y^ (W^X), and the amount of stringy information is < Z^(Y^(W^X)) , (3) String theory with Fredkin's finite nature hypothesis suggests dark-matter-compensation-constant = (3.9±.5) * 10^-5 . Is Professor MIlgrom of the Weizmann Institute the world's greatest living scientist? Google "pavel kroupa dark matter" & "riccardo scarpa mond arxiv",
"but we still haven't been able to verify his hypothesis" ... show me someone who refusing to use this hypothesis because it's not been proven. It's as absurd as being concerned that you can't prove two odd integers add to an even.
here for the 7 from the web: To determine whether a number is divisible by 7, you have to remove the last digit of the number, double it, and then subtract it from the remaining number. If the remainder is zero or a multiple of 7, then the number is divisible by 7.
Little engaged smart dude at 30:53 made my day. I love the idea of parents bringing their children to an event like this to inspire interest. 49:35 higher you go, more zeros. Sinusoids with increasing frequency might have this behavior. I've seen lots of zeros on multiplied sinusoids (in desmos graphing calculator simulations), but the blowups, I visualize as a form of complex exponential combined with wave construction interferences. That Mexican hat wavelet (aka Ricker wavelet aka Higgs wavefunction) is symmetric and capable of blowing up like this too, and then settling extremely quickly. It also has adjustable sharpness by adjusting sigma (I have been playing around with that special Wavelet in desmos graphing calculator). You'd need somehow to combine those various qualities, which you can only do with wave functions. 1:07:44 a spectral interpretation as he puts it. In my own observations on primes, prime frequencies never cross zero at the same point, within a 1Hz 2π period. Went and filed a patent pending to exploit this interesting property for quantum computation. He suggests describing orthogonal gaussian matrices at 1:09:00 but after playing with the Ricker wavelet, that model looks more suitable, and it's not a random distribution. So a matrix of orthogonal Ricker wavelets is what I would play around with. 1:10:30 Ricker is unitary and hermitian if I understand it right. 1:17:31 I'm glad they cleared up that random matrix theory is not actually random distributions, because I was mentally stuck there too. There IS an order (a spectral order of resonances) involved here even though their distributions appears random.
2 is the odd-est Prime because it is the transverse trancendental logarithmic condensation modulation cause-effect of one incidence of line-of-sight superposition density-intensity real-numberness sync-duration in temporal logarithmic Actuality, Superspin symmetrical Singularity in Completeness, e-Pi-i Resonance = odd Prime positioning here-now-forever of wave-particle coordination-identification, ie 1 is prime-ary identity, 2 is act-ually the Fluxion-Integral Temporal Calculus Condensation that is the Universal Unit Circle, modulo-geometrical placement of time-timing sync-duration, "floating in axial-tangential orthogonality vanishing-into-no-thing at the Universal Singularity coherence-cohesion objective, Logarithmic Time, AM-FM Communication In-form-ation Actuality. ONEINFINITY incident-instantaneous trancendental i-reflection Reciproction is QM-Time containment Principle in/of Perspective, self-defining substantiation... In other words, as a Mathematician Observes the equality of Identification with actual Quality of cause-effect quantization, aka Fluxion-Integral Temporal Calculus Condensation, the dominant functional self-definition of wave-particle coordination-identification significance in scalar density-intensity real-numberness probability is the simplest Form-ation of Superspin-Modulation positioning Singularity Symmetry-balance.., 2-ness i-reflection containment state-ment.., which implies the Black-body Singularity Conception of vanishing-into-no-thing, orthogonal-normal logarithmic axialtangential superpositionPerspective. We perceive this as coherence-cohesion bonding objects of Rotation in Landscape Perspective Projection Drawing Conception.., Polar-Cartesian self-defining Origin of exponential pure relative motion coordination-identification positioning or Holographic zero-infinity trancendentally hyper-hypo temporal Modulation Ruled, Universal Fusion-bonding observable in/of line-of-sight Primes and Zeros. Orthographic Geometrical Drawing and Perspective frames of phase-locked coherence-cohesion sync-duration Cartesian connectivity.
![Barry Mazur "A Lecture on Primes and the Riemann Hypothesis" [2014]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/way0jAWpjZA/mqdefault.jpg)
WOW, lots of gems in this talk. I've seen the graph at 40:00 for real-part = 1/2 in several other youtube videos and have always wondered what it would look like at something not exactly 1/2 and here we have it !!!
When you get a call from an unidentified number you can say "I will pick the call if and only if it is a prime number", what is hard, is to do so before the call finishes.
The graph shown at 49:55 made my first artificial neuron fire. Thank you Professor 😁
Watching the presentation I was like struck by lightning at 59:08, as 5 is not the first prime "of interest", but 3! I never realized, that the Clarke transform is linked to the Riemann Hypothesis in this way!
Dr Brian Great lecture! and thank you you very much for explaining the history and importance of R.H.
I understand the quartets (like 101, 103, 107, 109) as occuring when the more significant figures don't add up to a sum divisible by 3, together with the 1, 3, 7 and 9 that all prime numbers must have as their least significant figure. If the figures of a number adds up to a number divisible by 3, then that number itself is divisible by 3.
When identifying the squares vector, when do we stop? In the case of P=5 we stop at 4, P=7 at 9. Is it, that we stop when an identified square is hit again? P=5: 4, 9; P=7: 9,16 ?
As I do not really understand the consequences of the vectors addition as shown at 59:08, I may ask: what if we substract all vectors first and then add the square vectors two times? As all vectors, starting from 0 end up in a complete way round, can't the target be reached by adding the square vectors only?
From every row of Pascal triangle deduce 1-2-1=-2, 1-3-3+1=-4, 1-4-6+4-1=-6, 1-5-10+10-5+1=-8.....etc all trivial zero of zeta function, have such pattern from(x-1)^n of Pascal triangle, flip -,+ sign from 3rd term on.
Starts at 4:57
@33:44 why have you chosen Cosine function? should this not be divided by sqrt(X)? I mean should it be Cos (Gamma N Log(X))/ sqrt (X) ?
you get the same result if you choose sine function. now that is something
Can the faulty arithmetic of 9/11 be examined here ? Three thousand missing bodies seemed to totally eliminate any credibility of a building collapses theory given that no other examples exist in world history of such a low rate of recovery. Twenty five years hasn’t given us another example either . Add to that the fact it happened twice on the same day to two identical buildings at the same location and it certainly looks impossible.
WOW I can't believe it! In Dec 2017 I did a TH-cam video titled 'Fermat's Last Theorem : 125=126' and now I find it confirmed by Prof Brian Conrey and the GREAT Carl Freidrich Gauss no less who got 125 and 126 respectively for one of their sums of the same data at 21 minutes into the video.
Informative, love fron India
The function has zeros out of the critical line! This invalidate the hypothesis or not and why? Follows: 2+198i; 2+298i and 2+299i.
it has to be of the form 1/2 + k*i
@@ahusky4498 How the hell can I even work at all?? Its the square root of -1 ITS NON COMPUTABLE!!!!
@@drrobotnik5376 non-computable for the real numbers :)
at 42 min you say there is no zeros on the side Re(z)
The slide actually says complex zeros which in this context is another way to refer to the non trivial (or symmetric) zeros of zeta. The other (trivial) zeros that you mention are purely real and arise from the other factors of the functional equation, namely the gamma factors, so they are not symmetric zeros of zeta.
If another aspect of POV is to use Euler's implied symbolically connected inference in the projection-drawing picture-plane, on the Blackboard that is, how effectively the innate "whole message" of logarithmic condensation-coordination vanishing-into-no-thing Singularity-point positioning is exposed to view depends on the assembly of functional abstractions shown us by our Teachers. Eg if we are familiar with the entangled connection of Absolute Zero-infinity reference-framing containment positioning NOW of/by i-reflection Singularity-point, the expectation is that all potential positioning possibilities are contained, recognisable within the holography dimensionality of e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity sync-duration, represented by the Unit Circle of Infinity @.dt instantaneously.
But the Mathologer's and 3BLUE 1BROWN Students know how to speak the million dollar language, to qualify.
Prime number equation
[(n-2)!-1]÷n=whole number
Yes, that result would follow from Wilson's Theorem.
Not -
THE.
IT IS TIME
MATH TO INTER
BIBLE FOR RETURNING OF
JESUS
The answer to the Riemann Hypothesis is Infinity.
Infinity times infinity equals infinity to the power of infinity.
Infinity squared equals infinity to the power of infinity.
If 2 is a prime then so is infinity.
You are all welcome.
KARMA.
Let’s make the proof simpler : th-cam.com/video/EMqnSEhvMs4/w-d-xo.html
This is so tedious. If he cut out all the umms and aahs, it would probably be at least 10% shorter. If you can't present something in a concise and/or interesting manner, stop clogging up the internet!
Truth is in the eye of the beholder my friend. But, your truth …idk. Reconsider my friend.
Best video that explains such a complex phenomenon in a simple language - thanks a bunch
"... the list of primes goes on forever ..." According to Edward Fredkin, infinities, infinitesimals, perfectly continuous functions, and local sources of randomness are figments of human imagination and do not occur in nature. I conjecture that the Riemann Hypothesis is true but unprovable in ZFC, but ZFC and Peano Arithmetic are contrary to empirical existence. There is a saying on Wall Street: Trees do not grow to the sky. Do an arbitrarily large number of positive integers occur in nature? Consider some conjectures: (1) There are three fundamental levels of physics: classical field theory, quantum field theory, & string theory, (2) There exist positive integers W, X, Y, & Z - each greater than 1 and less than 10,000 - such that the amount of classical information is < W^X, the amount of quantum information is < Y^ (W^X), and the amount of stringy information is < Z^(Y^(W^X)) , (3) String theory with Fredkin's finite nature hypothesis suggests dark-matter-compensation-constant = (3.9±.5) * 10^-5 . Is Professor MIlgrom of the Weizmann Institute the world's greatest living scientist? Google "pavel kroupa dark matter" & "riccardo scarpa mond arxiv",
Thompson Nancy Lewis Brian Taylor Mary
"but we still haven't been able to verify his hypothesis" ... show me someone who refusing to use this hypothesis because it's not been proven. It's as absurd as being concerned that you can't prove two odd integers add to an even.
Awesome what this guy has done.
Wonderful stuff! Thank you for making these available to the public throughout the world.
it amounts to "statistical arithmetics" .
45:22
Either these kids in the audience are child prodigies or something did not go quite right in describing the required math for this presentation.
here for the 7 from the web: To determine whether a number is divisible by 7, you have to remove the last digit of the number, double it, and then subtract it from the remaining number. If the remainder is zero or a multiple of 7, then the number is divisible by 7.
Little engaged smart dude at 30:53 made my day. I love the idea of parents bringing their children to an event like this to inspire interest.
49:35 higher you go, more zeros. Sinusoids with increasing frequency might have this behavior. I've seen lots of zeros on multiplied sinusoids (in desmos graphing calculator simulations), but the blowups, I visualize as a form of complex exponential combined with wave construction interferences.
That Mexican hat wavelet (aka Ricker wavelet aka Higgs wavefunction) is symmetric and capable of blowing up like this too, and then settling extremely quickly. It also has adjustable sharpness by adjusting sigma (I have been playing around with that special Wavelet in desmos graphing calculator).
You'd need somehow to combine those various qualities, which you can only do with wave functions. 1:07:44 a spectral interpretation as he puts it.
In my own observations on primes, prime frequencies never cross zero at the same point, within a 1Hz 2π period. Went and filed a patent pending to exploit this interesting property for quantum computation.
He suggests describing orthogonal gaussian matrices at 1:09:00 but after playing with the Ricker wavelet, that model looks more suitable, and it's not a random distribution. So a matrix of orthogonal Ricker wavelets is what I would play around with. 1:10:30 Ricker is unitary and hermitian if I understand it right.
1:17:31 I'm glad they cleared up that random matrix theory is not actually random distributions, because I was mentally stuck there too. There IS an order (a spectral order of resonances) involved here even though their distributions appears random.
3:46 must be her husband...
Very good 👍
2 is the odd-est Prime because it is the transverse trancendental logarithmic condensation modulation cause-effect of one incidence of line-of-sight superposition density-intensity real-numberness sync-duration in temporal logarithmic Actuality, Superspin symmetrical Singularity in Completeness, e-Pi-i Resonance = odd Prime positioning here-now-forever of wave-particle coordination-identification, ie 1 is prime-ary identity, 2 is act-ually the Fluxion-Integral Temporal Calculus Condensation that is the Universal Unit Circle, modulo-geometrical placement of time-timing sync-duration, "floating in axial-tangential orthogonality vanishing-into-no-thing at the Universal Singularity coherence-cohesion objective, Logarithmic Time, AM-FM Communication In-form-ation Actuality.
ONEINFINITY incident-instantaneous trancendental i-reflection Reciproction is QM-Time containment Principle in/of Perspective, self-defining substantiation...
In other words, as a Mathematician Observes the equality of Identification with actual Quality of cause-effect quantization, aka Fluxion-Integral Temporal Calculus Condensation, the dominant functional self-definition of wave-particle coordination-identification significance in scalar density-intensity real-numberness probability is the simplest Form-ation of Superspin-Modulation positioning Singularity Symmetry-balance.., 2-ness i-reflection containment state-ment.., which implies the Black-body Singularity Conception of vanishing-into-no-thing, orthogonal-normal logarithmic axialtangential superpositionPerspective. We perceive this as coherence-cohesion bonding objects of Rotation in Landscape Perspective Projection Drawing Conception.., Polar-Cartesian self-defining Origin of exponential pure relative motion coordination-identification positioning or Holographic zero-infinity trancendentally hyper-hypo temporal Modulation Ruled, Universal Fusion-bonding observable in/of line-of-sight Primes and Zeros. Orthographic Geometrical Drawing and Perspective frames of phase-locked coherence-cohesion sync-duration Cartesian connectivity.
I take it this is satire. Or am I just too ignorant/stupid to follow what you wrote?
Lol!!!
@@RichardASalisbury1 It's satire, or he is a kook.
On line one it should read 'inverse' instead of 'transverse', otherwise correct...
It also appears in 42
She flew across the country to introduce a speaker. Does she care about climate change?