1970 Home Pele vs Argentina

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 66

  • @willphipps4820
    @willphipps4820 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What made peel better was that he was a more complete player and inventive than maradona...mind you..magazine played with heart and was also a great player .but with pale everything was balanced don't forget he can score with any part of his body...jump higher than any goalkeeper with there hands up

  • @williambazan4850
    @williambazan4850 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sin lugar a dudas el mas grande de todos los tiempos. El Rey Pelé..!

  • @suyezlee6650
    @suyezlee6650 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Old school fanboys will twist the facts and tell you that defenders were allowed to tackle from behind.
    But that's only half the story.
    At 4:15 and 4:43 you can clearly see some hard fouls from Pele himself. And he got away with it.
    It was no disadvantage, everyone was allowed to do that back then.

    • @a_guinness
      @a_guinness หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh come off it, you really think attacking players benefitted just as much as defenders under such conditions?
      Use your eyes, count how many times he was tackled to how many tackles he dished out.
      It wasn't just tackles from behind, defenders could go in studs showing and not be penalised, sometimes even if they didn't get the ball!
      No attacking player today has to put up with that! A defender is getting sent off even if he gets the ball for dangerous play.

  • @mvpmitsuimvp8858
    @mvpmitsuimvp8858 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    king forever

  • @LeonardoGuerreiro
    @LeonardoGuerreiro 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    04:27 Amazing.

  • @Macross100
    @Macross100 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    ¿Me pareció o dio Argentina 3, Brazil 0?

  • @saswataroy9023
    @saswataroy9023 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only Argentinean fans and Maradona fans will dislike it

  • @LeoChannel20
    @LeoChannel20 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Maradona is Nr.1 by far better than Pelè!!!

    • @saswataroy9023
      @saswataroy9023 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only a fool like you will say like this

    • @suyezlee6650
      @suyezlee6650 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@saswataroy9023 No it's a fact. You're the fool here.

    • @Catholic-Christian
      @Catholic-Christian 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@suyezlee6650 it’s not a fact. You are the fool here. Pele is the best, dispute the rest

    • @suyezlee6650
      @suyezlee6650 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Catholic-Christian Pele is not the best. He is a product of his time. Everything I've watched on it points to it. Maybe he was 5-10 years ahead but that's the limit. Maradona is greater.

    • @Catholic-Christian
      @Catholic-Christian 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@suyezlee6650 Everyone is a product of their time. Pele the most complete and skillfull player that I have seen. And you add the fact that he’s the greatest winner in the history of the game and you have the 🐐 right there.

  • @fanfam
    @fanfam 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cruijff

  • @janomoscoso85
    @janomoscoso85 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Creo que Maradona y Cruyff eran mejores, más espectaculares y rápidos

  • @10Freekicks10
    @10Freekicks10 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And to think people compare this guy to Maradona. Pele would struggle so hard in modern day or 80's football.

    • @mskidi
      @mskidi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Only fools compare him to Maradona or any other player. Pele would average 120 goals and 90 assists per year in modern day football. Maybe even more. In 80s football where weak, skinny, slow Platini, Zico, Rumennige, Socrates etc reigned he would have to play with his hands tied behing his back to make the games a bit more competitive. Poor roided up midget Maradona needed the juice to compete with the aforementioned weaklings.

  • @aulasaulas9917
    @aulasaulas9917 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    o jogo era muito de vagar. os caras jogavam andando. hoje nem na pelada os caras fazem mais isso. Desse jeito era mais fácil,, até eu com um bom treino jogaria muito bem futebol

    • @RuanPablo-zo2vy
      @RuanPablo-zo2vy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aulas Aulas0293849384 mas hoje os jogadores evoluíram muito a forma de jogar, por isso que é diferente