The problem is students are not proofreading or even reviewing the AI generated paper. The result is often a paper filled with incorrect or misleading information from the tool's hallucinations. This is especially egregious in the bibliography, where LLMs often manufacture fictionalized citations. We need to insist that students proofread and double check the accuracy of their papers each and every time, as they will be graded on the quality of the work. This is not the magic bullet we think it is, but merely a tool to aid with writing quality, and not a consistently accurate source of information.
I agree totally. It's a form of cheating that I try to penalize and discuss with students. I want them to use all the writing tools they can, but they must learn to do so ethically and effectively. An AI draft is just that--a draft. Without their own revisions, it is cheating.
If you don't edit it yourself it often contains wrong information, is redundant, and very easy to tell it's written by chatgpt. The ai tool has a certain style of writing that can make it sound like some highschoolers wrote it.
No. Using ChatGPT as a brainstorming and editing tool is accepted. Using ChatGPT to generate an entire draft and turning it in without any of your own revisions would be highly problematic. Consider Grammarly, which is widely accepted and recommended by schools. Like ChatGPT, Grammarly is an AI tool based on an LLM (large language model). Like ChatGPT, Grammarly uses algorithms to generate suggestions to student work. As a college professor I once tried to fail a student for using AI. Five web-based AI plagiarism detectors flagged the student's essay as machine-generated. But I was told by the school that web-based AI plagiarism detectors cannot be used because they are not reliable in court. My only option was to ask the student to rewrite and not use ChatGPT. The student declined and I had to grade the work as if it was original. The other approach is to compare the student's previous work with what is suspected to be AI-generated work. Only in the most egregious cases does that work. Every writing teacher knows that a student's performance can vary widely from assignment to assignment for a number of reasons. Then there are the strategies for by-passing AI detection: th-cam.com/video/OypUfG4id5M/w-d-xo.html Fact: The genie is out of the bottle. Just Google "AI tools like chatgpt." Schools need to deal with generative AI and the challenge it presents to the traditional notion of plagiarism. AI isn't going away. It's becoming more sophisticated and an everyday part of our lives. Today's kindergartners are using ChatGPT. In 5 years, check back on this thread and prepare to be shocked at the changes in how we view and use AI.
Each product produced by ChatGPT is unique, one of a kind. Plagiarizing yourself means reusing your past work without acknowledgement. Self-plagiarism has nothing to do with ChatGPT's generative products
For recent information on updates, check OpenAI's official announcements or website: chatgpt.com/share/a48802cc-aae7-44cf-bedb-1532e7e2d97c?oai-dm=1 The latest update was April 2023. The statement "any information developed will not be current" is true primarly for global news events after the lastest update.
@@peakdavid I ran a test and query testing the system and went back and forth talking a range of topics, especially scholarly and the system kept coming back with the time-frame.... That's correct. As an AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have access to real-time information or updates. My training data goes up until January 2022, so any events or developments that occurred after that time are unknown to me...... he citation patterns and conventions I've learned include a wide range of sources up to January 2022. These patterns are based on the data available to me during my training, which includes various publications, articles, and other texts from before that time. While I can't access new information or updates beyond my training data, I can generate citations based on the patterns learned from the existing data.
Thanks dad! For 6000 years (the beginning of writing is often dated to 3500 BC in ancient Sumer) the technology of writing has always changed what and how we write, from clay tablets to word processed documents to AI. Each innovation has always been accompanied by doubts, fears, and resistance. ChatGPT is no different.
![[UNCUT] "บอสณวัฒน์" แฉ! แหล่งซุกเงินแก๊งบอส ขยันผิดที่ไม่กี่ปีก็เข้าคุก l คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ l17ต.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BL56qIfXYZM/mqdefault.jpg)
The problem is students are not proofreading or even reviewing the AI generated paper. The result is often a paper filled with incorrect or misleading information from the tool's hallucinations. This is especially egregious in the bibliography, where LLMs often manufacture fictionalized citations.
We need to insist that students proofread and double check the accuracy of their papers each and every time, as they will be graded on the quality of the work.
This is not the magic bullet we think it is, but merely a tool to aid with writing quality, and not a consistently accurate source of information.
I agree totally. It's a form of cheating that I try to penalize and discuss with students. I want them to use all the writing tools they can, but they must learn to do so ethically and effectively. An AI draft is just that--a draft. Without their own revisions, it is cheating.
If you don't edit it yourself it often contains wrong information, is redundant, and very easy to tell it's written by chatgpt. The ai tool has a certain style of writing that can make it sound like some highschoolers wrote it.
Won't this be penalized as plagiarism?
No. Using ChatGPT as a brainstorming and editing tool is accepted. Using ChatGPT to generate an entire draft and turning it in without any of your own revisions would be highly problematic.
Consider Grammarly, which is widely accepted and recommended by schools. Like ChatGPT, Grammarly is an AI tool based on an LLM (large language model). Like ChatGPT, Grammarly uses algorithms to generate suggestions to student work.
As a college professor I once tried to fail a student for using AI. Five web-based AI plagiarism detectors flagged the student's essay as machine-generated. But I was told by the school that web-based AI plagiarism detectors cannot be used because they are not reliable in court. My only option was to ask the student to rewrite and not use ChatGPT. The student declined and I had to grade the work as if it was original.
The other approach is to compare the student's previous work with what is suspected to be AI-generated work. Only in the most egregious cases does that work. Every writing teacher knows that a student's performance can vary widely from assignment to assignment for a number of reasons. Then there are the strategies for by-passing AI detection: th-cam.com/video/OypUfG4id5M/w-d-xo.html
Fact: The genie is out of the bottle. Just Google "AI tools like chatgpt." Schools need to deal with generative AI and the challenge it presents to the traditional notion of plagiarism. AI isn't going away. It's becoming more sophisticated and an everyday part of our lives. Today's kindergartners are using ChatGPT.
In 5 years, check back on this thread and prepare to be shocked at the changes in how we view and use AI.
Do you not upload electronically??? If so, they will have a plagiarism system...
I got into trouble for plagiarising myself 🤯🤷🤣
Each product produced by ChatGPT is unique, one of a kind. Plagiarizing yourself means reusing your past work without acknowledgement. Self-plagiarism has nothing to do with ChatGPT's generative products
Thank you for these tips Professor. It helps me to save time creating my research.
Good luck and let me know how I can help!
The downside is that the system has a 2-year delay, so any information developed will not be current. The system has not been updated since Jan 2022
For recent information on updates, check OpenAI's official announcements or website: chatgpt.com/share/a48802cc-aae7-44cf-bedb-1532e7e2d97c?oai-dm=1 The latest update was April 2023. The statement "any information developed will not be current" is true primarly for global news events after the lastest update.
@@peakdavid I ran a test and query testing the system and went back and forth talking a range of topics, especially scholarly and the system kept coming back with the time-frame.... That's correct. As an AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have access to real-time information or updates. My training data goes up until January 2022, so any events or developments that occurred after that time are unknown to me...... he citation patterns and conventions I've learned include a wide range of sources up to January 2022. These patterns are based on the data available to me during my training, which includes various publications, articles, and other texts from before that time. While I can't access new information or updates beyond my training data, I can generate citations based on the patterns learned from the existing data.
How do you set up AI or were do you download .
This video demonstrates ChatGPT from Open Ai. Just Google "AI Chatbots" and you'll find dozens.
Tried this out, psyched by what I got. Wish all my profs were up-to-date on these tools. They'll be standarad soon.
Thanks dad! For 6000 years (the beginning of writing is often dated to 3500 BC in ancient Sumer) the technology of writing has always changed what and how we write, from clay tablets to word processed documents to AI. Each innovation has always been accompanied by doubts, fears, and resistance. ChatGPT is no different.