Wow, incredible !! What a symbiosis between your two guitars which beat like a single heart. This music by G. Gershwin is very complex and the transcription you have produced is of incredible precision and great respect. A BIG thank you to both of you for this page of music so intense. Musically Phil
Technically brilliant playing combined and passionate intensity are on full display from the Kupinski Duo. Oh for a long evening at their house after dinner. There's simply no other sound quite as charming as a well played guitar duet. BRAVO! Kupimski Dou,
Earlier I had made a comment about this where I mentioned "mistakes" which has distracted people from my main point. This just seems like random playing. One time, as an experiment, someone put a kindergartener's finger painting up in a museum of art. All the critics raved about how incredible a commentary it was on the human condition. At the same time, I saw another experiment where they took a concert violinist and put him in a subway. The only people that stopped were the ones who recognized him. I wonder what the response would be to this "music" if a couple of first-year guitarists randomly hit notes in a concert. I get the feeling that classical guitarists are out of ideas for new music so they turn to stuff like "non-tonal" music because they got nothing. Then if you are critical of the noise you are told that your understanding of music hasn't "evolved" well enough. Maybe you can't even call noise, noise anymore?
If you can't tell the difference between the playing of professional guitarists and that of first-year guitarists hitting random notes you probably shouldn't be commenting on music and drawing misguided metaphors. The music this guitar duo is playing in this video is not atonal at any point. And it most certainly is NOT noise. Piazzolla noise? Granados noise? God forbid! Granted, the Bogdanovic piece is modern and somewhat avant-garde but it is not atonal and it is definitely not noise. 20th century composers are often experimental and their music may at times sound odd, but it may also be very interesting. It just might need some getting used to on your part. And by the way, the playing of the guitarists is superb. I am a guitarist myself and I know what I am talking about.
And, to answer your point about the finger painting, there does not exist one musical critic in the world who would not recognize a couple of first-year guitarists playing random notes as a couple of first-year guitarists playing random notes. Your art metaphor does not apply in any way whatsoever to music. It takes a great amount of skill, which you can only acquire by many years of practice, to play a musical instrument.
@@sofiagaliotou7328 It is difficult to get the tone of someone's comments when it is written. You seem to put a great deal of emphasis on who is producing the sound rather than the sound itself. So it is Piazolla, big deal. Grandos? good for Grandos. What are these people, gods? They produce a sound and we must all bow down and call it music because they say it is? Really doesn't make sense. I also find your statement "there is not one musical critic in the world" as simple hyperbole. Recently a Pineapple and a pair of sunglasses were mistaken as works of art in a museum. They weren't. In the case of the pineapple, it was left there for just that purpose, to see if people would think it was art. More importantly, there have been a number of experiments that show that often who and where someone is doing something influences how it is evaluated more so than the actual thing. For example, one study took concert violinists and put them in a subway station and they were ignored, except by the people who recognized them. I suspect that this sound is considered music because of who is playing it and not the artistic value in it. As you demonstrated in your own response, it is Grandos. It is Piazolla. It must be music. I'd rather question than simply accept what I am told.
@@alexisrivera6238 Well, that is kind of my point. It is hard for me to think of that as "music" much less something that is enjoyable. Have people just given up on trying to write something that sounds good and just randomly bang on their instrument?
@@williamgiovinazzo8523 not that I agree with your view however you deserve my respect. I ends as a matter of personal preference as to how anyone enjoys music or not. And I guess that is the beauty of it all, different perspectives.
No mistakes, the evolution of music is the integration of dissonance that keeps the music fresh, but it requires evolution of taste. It's why they said Beethoven had lost his mind and would never be able to make music, he incorporated more dissonance than they had developed a taste for.
trying to understand your comment.... is it more addressed to inaccuracy while playing? and who looks for mistakes in an interpretation of the music anyway.....?
Brilliant interpretation of Piazzolla AND Gershwin
BRAAAAAVOOOOO !!!
Gershwin's Rhapsody beautiful adaptation ♥️♥️♥️
Thank you so much
Kudos!!!
Very good ilike this this is good aide thanks good forall
Best guitar duo in the world. Wonderful and absorbing repertoire, played with total commitment, style and passion. Fabulous as always.
Very well said,
Duo Assad and Kupinski Guitar Duo are my favourite duos of all time! Thank you so much for sharing your music!
Jm
I would also add Siqueira - Lima, all these duos are original, all different and all marvelous!
Bravo, Ewa and Dariush!!
Wow, incredible !! What a symbiosis between your two guitars which beat like a single heart. This music by G. Gershwin is very complex and the transcription you have produced is of incredible precision and great respect. A BIG thank you to both of you for this page of music so intense.
Musically
Phil
What a wonderful performance. And the Gershwin was just spectacular.
Technically brilliant playing combined and passionate intensity are on full display from the Kupinski Duo. Oh for a long evening at their house after dinner. There's simply no other sound quite as charming as a well played guitar duet. BRAVO! Kupimski Dou,
¡Fantástico!
Así se toca, apoyando. Enhorabuena
Wonderful adaptation of Gershwin's Rhapsody! What a marvelous technique and phantasy in interpreting! Thank you very much
Очень качественно играют, прелесть музыканты!
Magnificent. My favorite guitar duo!
Thank you:-)
Mine too!! 👍
What a wonderfully artful duo!
... 33:49 so wonderful, deep soul, touching, peaceful ... BIG APPLAUSE !!
Thank you :-)
Excellent duo. Amazing concert. Bravo!
This is a treasure. Fabulous!
Fabulosa musica 👌
Superb. Wonderful.
A program would be awesome.
Felicito a todos los guitarristas del mundo. Hacen un trabajo precioso !
a fabulous performance! Bravo! Bravissimo!
Perfection!
FANTASTIQUE!!!!
Just phenomenal!!
Rewelacja!
What's the name of the piece that starts around 8 minutes?
Bliss. Hopefully still. Thank you.
Greetings! Is There a way to get a copy of the rhapsody in blue arrangment?
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
How good is this, how good are they !?? I know not.
Pretty darn good
@@isaacengelmusic And so so moving, playing Gershwin, towards the end 34:30 mins. Viva the West, warts n all.
Brilliant duo. but Fucking Ads ruined so much for me. Curse you, TH-cam.
Earlier I had made a comment about this where I mentioned "mistakes" which has distracted people from my main point. This just seems like random playing.
One time, as an experiment, someone put a kindergartener's finger painting up in a museum of art. All the critics raved about how incredible a commentary it was on the human condition. At the same time, I saw another experiment where they took a concert violinist and put him in a subway. The only people that stopped were the ones who recognized him.
I wonder what the response would be to this "music" if a couple of first-year guitarists randomly hit notes in a concert.
I get the feeling that classical guitarists are out of ideas for new music so they turn to stuff like "non-tonal" music because they got nothing. Then if you are critical of the noise you are told that your understanding of music hasn't "evolved" well enough. Maybe you can't even call noise, noise anymore?
I have understood your point and I agree with you...
Fortunately, it's not the music that's being judged.
If you can't tell the difference between the playing of professional guitarists and that of first-year guitarists hitting random notes you probably shouldn't be commenting on music and drawing misguided metaphors. The music this guitar duo is playing in this video is not atonal at any point. And it most certainly is NOT noise. Piazzolla noise? Granados noise? God forbid! Granted, the Bogdanovic piece is modern and somewhat avant-garde but it is not atonal and it is definitely not noise. 20th century composers are often experimental and their music may at times sound odd, but it may also be very interesting. It just might need some getting used to on your part. And by the way, the playing of the guitarists is superb. I am a guitarist myself and I know what I am talking about.
And, to answer your point about the finger painting, there does not exist one musical critic in the world who would not recognize a couple of first-year guitarists playing random notes as a couple of first-year guitarists playing random notes. Your art metaphor does not apply in any way whatsoever to music. It takes a great amount of skill, which you can only acquire by many years of practice, to play a musical instrument.
@@sofiagaliotou7328 It is difficult to get the tone of someone's comments when it is written.
You seem to put a great deal of emphasis on who is producing the sound rather than the sound itself. So it is Piazolla, big deal. Grandos? good for Grandos. What are these people, gods? They produce a sound and we must all bow down and call it music because they say it is? Really doesn't make sense.
I also find your statement "there is not one musical critic in the world" as simple hyperbole. Recently a Pineapple and a pair of sunglasses were mistaken as works of art in a museum. They weren't. In the case of the pineapple, it was left there for just that purpose, to see if people would think it was art.
More importantly, there have been a number of experiments that show that often who and where someone is doing something influences how it is evaluated more so than the actual thing. For example, one study took concert violinists and put them in a subway station and they were ignored, except by the people who recognized them. I suspect that this sound is considered music because of who is playing it and not the artistic value in it. As you demonstrated in your own response, it is Grandos. It is Piazolla. It must be music.
I'd rather question than simply accept what I am told.
On some of this "music", it sounds like they are just playing randomly. WHo the heck knows when they are making mistakes?
Who cares about mistakes anyway? Just enjoy music...
@@alexisrivera6238 Well, that is kind of my point. It is hard for me to think of that as "music" much less something that is enjoyable. Have people just given up on trying to write something that sounds good and just randomly bang on their instrument?
@@williamgiovinazzo8523 not that I agree with your view however you deserve my respect. I ends as a matter of personal preference as to how anyone enjoys music or not. And I guess that is the beauty of it all, different perspectives.
No mistakes, the evolution of music is the integration of dissonance that keeps the music fresh, but it requires evolution of taste. It's why they said Beethoven had lost his mind and would never be able to make music, he incorporated more dissonance than they had developed a taste for.
trying to understand your comment.... is it more addressed to inaccuracy while playing?
and who looks for mistakes in an interpretation of the music anyway.....?