Carlyle’s Lee on Private Equity, Growth, and Recovery

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @emmawelder3154
    @emmawelder3154 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The rich sees every economic crisis as the perfect time to start up an investment, and I believe this would be a good time to start up an investment.

    • @JiwanWill
      @JiwanWill 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Uzaifa Nazifi Bitcoin is actually $19,000 now and still
      going higher

    • @jamahmohammad5795
      @jamahmohammad5795 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've been making a lot through Bitcoin which has been the main source of my capital to invest in real estate.

    • @jamahmohammad5795
      @jamahmohammad5795 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Edafe Akpovo Actually an expert broker handles my investments in Crypto while I invest in some real estate with the profit I make.

    • @cedricjiosh6935
      @cedricjiosh6935 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamahmohammad5795 Does your broker do free consultation? I would love to meet him too

    • @jamahmohammad5795
      @jamahmohammad5795 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Edafe Akpovo invested 2000 usd with him and he got my financial status blow to 18000usd within a week

  • @hannahkim9659
    @hannahkim9659 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man is a genius - incredibly conversation

    • @juanzizi1245
      @juanzizi1245 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      For a non-WASP to rise to the top of these organizations I feel you have to be

  • @jamess4688
    @jamess4688 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @15:42 "Get ONE on your board"... This way of thinking is problematic. Do not make elevating and hiring minorities a checkbox item, make if apart of your culture. Well qualified individuals. Unfortunately, minorities have been over looked in many instances, but this needs to be a culture shift, not a "quota". I totally support diverse companies and boardrooms, but it must be done the right way, in the spirit of community and growth. I believe that Carlyle has a relatively good strategy for making this happen but we must address the root causes of why this is an issue and not make this a numbers game. Everything cannot be solved by quantitative methods, but this is a step in the right direction.

  • @khirgis7224
    @khirgis7224 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:00 2

  • @SpamMouse
    @SpamMouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting. Will Carlyle's investment policy ENSURE that companies across Asia include "diversity" of board membership to include both African-American and Caucasians in general? No I thought not. So your policy is totally racist.

  • @christinamariehicks1078
    @christinamariehicks1078 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Han coa

  • @zehahahha
    @zehahahha 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    cost to china he is postulating seems extremely miscalculated

    • @fredfrond6148
      @fredfrond6148 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Aayush Patodia how the assumptions are affecting the miscalculation? provide proof for your “postulation”. Seems to me some magical thinking going here just like your master trump.

    • @zehahahha
      @zehahahha 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fred Frond I am sorry I really don’t speak gibberish yet I will try to answer hoping that you speak functional English....so as per kewsong lee China hasn’t faced a very high cost on account of the pandemic...as far as China is concerned if you base any assumptions on the historical reported figures then you might as well just draw an imaginary hockey stick graph...however when you look at the real albeit anecdotal evidence, it all indicates towards the unimaginable cost China has had to bear. An illustrative list off the top of my head are as follows: 1. CCP for the first time in 2 decades has not set a GDP target 2. On account of having a huge dollar short position in the form of dollar debt and lack of exports a lot of Chinese corporates have been forced to forfeit collateral (or the lack thereof) which has exposed the Potemkin village that the Chinese economy is, case in point Kingold Jewellery had leveraged over 2 billion USD on fake gold as collateral (approx 83 tonnes or 4% of china’s gold reserves) 3. Post GFC China had followed a very aggressive lending policy which saw its private debt swell upwards of 300% of GDP and considering it has to actively manage its offshore renminbi rate, it will have no policy options but to let its internal economy implode as deflation (actual deflation because of over capacity and low demand not as per the CCP reported figures) makes the debt further unwieldy 4. China had lent close to 1.5 trillion dollars under BRI and will have to forbear on those if not to completely write them off, this will further tighten their net dollar position 5. Chinese state pension funds have started selling domestic stocks 6. China is replete with tonnes of zombie companies fuelled by the provisional governments lending them money and then securitising those bad loans and selling it to unsuspecting domestic savers as wealth management products imagine the fallout of this when those wealth management products are finally declared worthless on the back of a contracting economy , and this is all literally just the domestic economic fallout if you are to further consider the geo-political fallout from Hong Kong and how it has been antagonising it’s neighbors you will realise that this is really just the tip of the iceberg....as far as the comment about trump is concerned all I will say is this...leave it to an American obsessed with American politics to misconstrue every global event and participant as having to play any role in their warped polarised politics...I couldn’t care less about you or your stupid politics this is about something much bigger than that but I don’t expect the last remnants of your brain cells to register it...I only have an issue with ignorance and dogma so please don’t let bigotry prevent you from getting illuminated by the facts I have presented...good day/good night