Roger Federer v Andy Murray Extended Highlights | Australian Open 2010
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2022
- Watch the extended highlights between Roger Federer and Andy Murray in the final of the Australian Open 2010.
Subscribe to keep up with the latest from the Australian Open: bit.ly/AustralianOpenTV
Welcome to the official Australian Open TV TH-cam channel. The Australian Open is the first Grand Slam of the year and takes place in Melbourne. Rafael Nadal is the men’s singles reigning champion and Ashleigh Barty is the women’s singles reigning champion. The tournament takes place on 25 hard courts, including Rod Laver Arena, Margaret Court Arena and John Cain Arena. Look out for highlights, press conferences, memorable moments and much more!
Facebook: / australianopen
Twitter: / australianopen
Instagram: / australianopen
TikTok: / ausopen
Website: ausopen.com/ - กีฬา
![[HL] Roger Federer vs. Nikolay Davydenko 2010 Australian Open [QF]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2s1VY7lA78k/mqdefault.jpg)
Still remember Andy saying in his speech, 'I can cry like him. Wish I could play like him'♥️
that was not this match lol
@@TheRafaelBond it’s this match. He said:” I can cry like roger it’s a shame I can’t play like him”.
but in this match,Andy’s playing style is too simple...
@@WaldoTW he said that after the Wimbledon 2012 final, not this match.
@@thegreatNEb no andy said it during aus open final. Look it up
I genuinely don't think Murray even did much wrong in this match, just a devastating display of all court tennis from Federer. Probably the best example of the 'he could beat you every way possible' thing
Lol did you watch this? Murray did nothing first 2 sets, then blew the lead in the 3rd
It’s probably along with masters cup 2006 against Blake, ao 2009 against del potro and Wimbledon 2019 against djokovic are bu far his best god mode displays
@@TheRafaelBond He wasn't really allowed to do anything. Federer blew him off the court... winner after winner.
16 GS in 6,5 years (2003-2010)!!! this is 16th GS surpasses Pete Sampras, no one can break this record
Great performance from Fed, this was probably the end of his prime. The work on the backhand to drag Murray off the court was marvelous.
his prime was in 2017
@@iquix6073 nah
I'd say the ed as a Fed fan was the year before in his loss at the US open to Delpo
@@iquix6073 lol absolutely not
Lmao not at all. 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2017 he was better in all those seasons than in 2010.
Cleanest ball striking there ever was. Just listen to the sound of federers shots...omg high level goat 😂❤
If not for Nadal and Djokovic Federer alone would have Won 40+ GS
@A R Agreed
Same goes for Novak as well!
Not for Rafa as most of his wins came at RG where it didn't matter whom he played and against Roger whom he had in his pocket the whole time!
Yep. And the thing that nobody acknowledges is that - nobody stepped up to challenge those two. Since 2010 tennis has had a steady decline in talent. That's just a fact. A lot of good players but no great players. Between 2010 and 2019 we had an entire decade where only 2 other guys won Slam. If not for the lack of great talent then the 3 of them wouldn't each have 20+ Slams. The best athletes these days simply just do not choose tennis, can't afford tennis or have never had the opportunity to be exposed to it. Frankly they have cheaper options with sports that pay more money.
@@jollymolly2521 I personally don't agree. Novak and Rafa are once in a lifetime type of players with their consistency and longevity. The same questions about the level of competition didn't arise earlier due to sampras agassi or even the legends before then not dominating across surfaces for years. Murray, stan, delpo, thiem, Medvedev, zverev or even tsonga, Ferrer, Gonzalez, davydenko would have won slams in that era of tennis.
And if you see the matches except Rafa on clay, there is not that much of a difference between Nole Rafa and the rest of the competition. It's just their clutchness and focus when it's matters the most! That's the differentiator!
@@jollymolly2521 Are you saying Fed played against stronger opposition between 2003-2010 or that Nadal and Djoko took advantage of his declining (but still often high-quality) game from the 2010s on? For my part, I believe Djokovic benefitted the most from the Fed's "decline" in the 2010s, especially over 5 set matches. Sure, Fed was still capable of beating him (RG2011, Wimbledon2012), but the difference in their ages, Djokovic's improved stamina and relentlessness and, perhaps most importantly, the huge difference in the "match-miles" (Fed must have had at least 3 times as many as Djoko by 2011) is what allowed Djoko to _just about_ beat Fed in the slams and in some of their really tight matches.
It's why I think the "in-match" stats between the two are so telling. Fed trails 23-27, but leads or is equal in these five categories: points dominance (1.02), games dominance (1.01), total points won = 50.2%, total games won = 50.4%, total sets won = 50%. It shows that Fed was able to stay with and even outplay the Djoker "in match", all the way up to AO 2020, their last match. He just lost the ability to "close" the match as he grew older and Djoko grew more confident about Fed's propensity to get nervous. Also - *there is **_no_** other rivalry in tennis history, especially of such a long duration, where the player who's lost more has all these stats in their favour.* It's really quite remarkable and provides an insight into the type of player the Fed was, all the way up to the very end.
The more "superficial" win-loss and total titles records won't reflect any of this, but those who've watched their matches, both the ones before 2011 (19) and the ones after (31), know that the match was on the Fed's racket 8 out of 10 times. They also know that Djoko began to win when - 1) Fed began to decline (relatively, of course) and 2) when Djoko stopped trying to beat Fed at his own game (he used to go into the forecourt and volley and all that much more in their early matches) and decided to become a full-time baseline attritionalist, who waited for Fed to make the error...which he did more and more frequently. On those days he didn't (usually in 3 set matches), not only did Djoko lose, he was often blown away, e.g. Cincy 2012, Shanghai 2014, Cincy 2015, and WTF 2019.
4:50 THAT POINT ! THE CONSTRUTION & THE FINISH
That passing shot match point would've been glorious.
If only he could've won 2009 US Open. He could've won a calendar grand slam 😭😭
Yeah but that could’ve affected his performance here
He Choked against Delpo in 2009 USO.
Sir Roger federer golden legend in universal love you so much miss you so much teniss history best player ❤❤❤
That line about the mountain Andy having to climb being Everest-like proportions had me cracking up 😂
Then the line about him having back pain and “a pain of a different kind” oh man that guy was on fire that day!
This is the best quality the official tournament have?
Hey Australian Open TV, make a video of Fed's highlights from his 6 Australian Open title runs. The US Open Channel did it for his 5 there, and it was great
If tennis is a religion federar is the God
No, just no
A human is not a God whatever his skill in any field.
He will pass such as anyone..Be modest please...Another will be stronger it's the case now and that's life..
@@jpnduc i think you are the over talented Ronaldo is human not a Machine but people Called him that you are nadal is from earth but some people say he is Alien you are just a very serious person Messi is also Called alien i think real sports fan understand my word
@@Grp79841 Sorry..nobody is a God..you can be champion but worship somebody because he plays very well at tennis is a bit...weird even if I know this word means in sport..Surely à question of représentation and symbol.
But human need panem and circus of course..😉
@@jpnduc stop acting modest cuz your nit
Miss you very much Roger
One of the great Federer performances
The AO channel is pretty awesome.
How does an official feed of a match from 2010 have such poor video quality?
Upload every match from him.
yes every match please
Yes! Like someone said a few months ago, once Fed retires, *_every_** one of his matches (from 1998-2021) should be uploaded **_in full_** and in the highest quality available.* (Ideally, they should do it for free but they could even charge a small fee if they wanted to and millions of people would pay.) It's the least Tennis TV can do for a player who single-handedly elevated the sport and whose like we will _never_ see again.
The last GS event of Roger's prime.
❤️
The greatest ever !! ❤
There's never been a better show in tennis than Roger Federer in full flight. The forehand, the serve, the backhand, the defense, the insane footwork and crazy shot making from anywhere on the court? That's why I call it "Roger Porn." Still, I feel sorry for Andy Murray. In another era he probably would have won 7 or 8 Grand Slams instead of 3.
Yessir! And there will _never_ be a better show. Because a sport only gets one chance to incarnate itself and, luckily for us, it incarnated itself in the Fed. He single-handedly elevated the game, by creating and revealing a new aesthetics for it. He also, in his golden period from 2004-2009, *was simultaneously its most prolific winner, greatest shotmaker, and aesthetic touchstone.* Fed is the *only* other athlete in _any_ individual sport to have ever done this. That he did it in a sport as physically and athletically demanding as tennis is what makes it even more astonishing. He is Mr. Tennis and the sport's forever and irreplaceable gold standard. Tennis will go on, but it will never be the same with Fed. He was the rarest of rare things: a never-before-never-again phenomenon.
P.S: Want to hear something funny? I commented on another video about Fed being the only athlete who was simultaneously winner and aesthetic touchstone and someone countered with...Phil Taylor. 🙃 I didn't know what to say...and so I didn't say anything.
The 0:40 point must have been such a "Jesus Christ, it's going to be one of those days" moment for Murray.
🐐
The fact that Roger won this tournament 7 years later is mind boggling
yep, 2 years in a row too
In the next 7 years (being in his prime) he took only 1 more GS.
Due to Djokovic and Nadal.
Mostly Djokovic
@@patrickw9706don’t be disingenuous. The same Nadal who won 13 GS after 2010 also contributed to Feds lack of titles.
@@TUTUMAHNadal beat Fed most of GS matches in 2000's while Djokovic beat Fed most of GS matches in 2010's.
Murray has like 8 slams in any other era 😕
Federer only won 4 more grand slams after this match.
From the French Open 2008 to the Australian Open 2010, Roger was in 8 consecutive GS Finals! That's insane. Always the GOAT for me.
how many of those finals did he win
@@bradleydavis9502 4, which is pretty good. Considering most guys never win even one
Djokovic's the undisputed GOAT
Amazing mental strength by Federer in 3rd set, only if he showed the same against Djokovic.
He have mental block against Nadal Djokovic. Especially against second one.
Fed's eighth slam finals a row.
Back when Federer had those long curly and wavy hair
Murray was a wallop7ng baby for big 3..
He beat fed only once in a slam, lost uso wim and oz final..
He beat joker twice in slam finals, lost 3 oz finals and an rg final...
I think he never met Nadal at a slam final....
H2h clearly in favor of Nadal..
Yet we hear big 4 as if Murray was equal to big 3 ....
Djokovic is the GOAT. He is erasing Federer from record books.
Erased already.
Murray has no clue, what to do
It's official, Fed has conquered all of his peers as G.O.A.T. and this is why
1. Best in Tennis - most complete game with effortless fluid style of play, first to reach 20 Grand Slams and that too without huffing and puffing (without breaking a sweat), 5 consecutive wins each in 3 Grand Slams, most number of wimbledon wins at 8, Inventor of new shots like SABR, tweener between the legs, look-back reverse smash etc.
2. Considered the best by G.O.A.Ts of others Sports/Celebs across the world - Acknowledged as the greatest by Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo upon his retirement, Role model of the G.O.A.T in Cricket - Sachin Tendulkar and also Virat Kohli, Acknowledged as greatest by Michael Jordan - the G.O.A.T in basketball, touted as the greatest on his retirement by a horde of basketball legends, footballers, Formula One Champions, Atheletics Champoins, his tennis peers and hollywood stars, world business leaders and the common tennis fan.
3. Best in Retirement - Post the most touching and classy retirement video, instantly had the best reactions and widely recognized as the G.O.A.T by majority of tennis fans around the world with people gearing up to quit watching tennis. We may even see a drop in tennis viewership and ticket sales across the world because of Fed's exit, with Alcaraz being tennis's last hope.
4. Most Loved Player of All Time - Thats an irrefutable truth just based on his popularity alone. Fed hasn't been playing regularly for close to 4.5 years and yet is the most watched and highest paid tennis player each year.
5. Best in Post Retirement Game as a Businessman - Limited Joint deals with Michael Jordan on Nike Jordan kicks, Brand ambassador for Rolex, Lindt, Uniqlo and other countless leading brands, making him the most successful tennis player of all time and insanely rich 😀.
Having said all this I have too much respect for Nadal with his incredible work ethic, never give up attitude and perseverance which helped him dominate the French Open for over a decade. So imo the G.O.A.T accolade is a tie between Federer (Fast track route) and Nadal (Hard route).
......And you may wonder, what about Djokovic? Unfortunately, he's not in the conversation but does get a mention in the footnote.
3rd most gs, negative h2h vs both nadal and djokovic....he's the People’s goat but the factual debate is only of nadal and djokovic
Agreed
Hey cricket fan Djokovic is now the goat. Have fun
Another choking moment from Federer!
(Sorry Rog, you are the most stylish and gifted player).
When he let the volley go on Championship point.
Murray was so poor in this match. He didn't play bad but his tactics were inviting trouble the whole time. Such short balls on both the FH and BH side. Federer was always going to capitalise!