The ruck is a good glassing tripod could to to shot off of with its 30lbs weight rating. You also got to figure in the cost of a ball head or anvil head.
Good of you to show this. I am very content with both of my Two Vets tripods, the Recon (v.1) and the Ruck. The Recon with leveling head is obviously a more robust unit, but I usually practice using Tikka TAC models and other rifles on the Ruck with the RRS Anvil-30 head because it is a bit more of a challenge. With shooting sticks for rear support I find it to be sturdy enough and a very accurate combination. Two Vets has some excellent offerings, but they don't get the coverage that some other brands do.
Solid video. I have a two vets no name and a ruck. Love them both. Well worth the money. I do have a rrs ball head on my no name. I think it my opinion the do compete well in offering a lot for the cost.
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork my rrs is the bh-55 ball head. The one from two vets for my ruck (backcountry tripod) will have their new 44mm dual tension ball head with area 419 clamp
Just from personal experience with a wide variety of photography based tripods, I can tell you it won't be as stable as the Two Vets or Really Right Stuff. Especially when you add a heavy rifle in there. I'm sure it will work, but the level of precision will be less.
So Joel in your opinion outside of going RRS. Is this the tripod to get for the money? I'm thinking the Recon V2 and an anvil 30 will be the perfect combo for my ATX setup as well as hunting with the LRH
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork Joel with area 419’s discount i could have the recon V2 and the arca clamp with the two vets head for right at $800. Should i do that or just buy the tripod and grab an anvil 30
I’m just starting my journey with long range shooting and I’m considering a tripod. I’m also a photographer and considering in converting a photography tripod for my rifle (Ruger precision). What’s your take on that? Thank you!
The issue with standard photography tripods is that they typically aren’t rated to hold the weight of a heavy rifle, especially the ballheads. Because of that, they are usually very wobbly to shoot off of. Certainly you can do it, but there are better tools for the job. These ones in the video are rated to 100lbs. Extremely stable. It’s more than enough for shooting and obviously will still work well for photo and video.
When showing the smaller tripod it didn't look like there was a ball head attached. So in saying that do these tripods come with the ball head and arca attachment or are those sold separately.
Carbon fiber is quite pricey. It is what it is. I use and 0311G from Shadowtech. Right now you can find them for $138.00. IT IS SIGNIFICANLY HEAVIER than anything carbon fiber, but its durable and rock steady.
I guess like everything, it's relative. When the upper end of this type of tripod from really right stuff sells for $1500 then yes this is affordable. If a $100 tripod seems like a stretch, then this $650 two vets will probably seem extreme. Different tools for different jobs.
Sorry, but that’s being said by someone with little to no positional long range shooting experience and likely very little use of a tripod. (Please correct me if I’m wrong) They are not all created equal.
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork I get what you are saying. With that said, an 0311G from Shadowtech is every bit as tough and its $138.00 ITS NOWHERE NEAR AS LIGHT, but its less than a quarter of the price. I would love a carbon fiber tripod but for 630.00 I'll have to keep doing pushups. Love the channel though, keep doing it well.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
IDK others but 650 isnt as "affordable " I think ? But they do have a Ruck model which is 240-260 on their website.
Yeah affordability is super relative to the person. I think nowadays everybody is looking for more value for what little dollars we have
Totally understand, but when the high end Really Right Stuff is $1500…🤷🏻♂️
The ruck is a good glassing tripod could to to shot off of with its 30lbs weight rating. You also got to figure in the cost of a ball head or anvil head.
@@chrisfisher3900 people always want more for their money. That's not just a "nowadays" thing.
Thanks for the demo nicely done and thank you for the exposure I have never heard of them before.
Good of you to show this.
I am very content with both of my Two Vets tripods, the Recon (v.1) and the Ruck. The Recon with leveling head is obviously a more robust unit, but I usually practice using Tikka TAC models and other rifles on the Ruck with the RRS Anvil-30 head because it is a bit more of a challenge. With shooting sticks for rear support I find it to be sturdy enough and a very accurate combination. Two Vets has some excellent offerings, but they don't get the coverage that some other brands do.
Thanks for watching.
I’ve had a 2 vets for years and still going strong.
They seem pretty nice to me.
Thank you 😊
Solid video. I have a two vets no name and a ruck. Love them both. Well worth the money. I do have a rrs ball head on my no name. I think it my opinion the do compete well in offering a lot for the cost.
I’m a big fan of the Anvil 30 ballhead. Is that what you have?
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork my rrs is the bh-55 ball head. The one from two vets for my ruck (backcountry tripod) will have their new 44mm dual tension ball head with area 419 clamp
Looks like quality equipment. Price is not bad as well.
I've been shotgunning and blasting centerfire rifles for decades, but I never tire of 22lr and PCP rifles these days.
Agree on 22’s. So much fun.
Thanks for this video! Just in time as I'm in the marker for a tripod
Yep. Thanks for watching.
Yep. Thanks for watching.
You should review the US tactical supply actrivus tripod…… it’s the Manfrotto MT055 but with a military contract
Just from personal experience with a wide variety of photography based tripods, I can tell you it won't be as stable as the Two Vets or Really Right Stuff. Especially when you add a heavy rifle in there. I'm sure it will work, but the level of precision will be less.
So Joel in your opinion outside of going RRS. Is this the tripod to get for the money? I'm thinking the Recon V2 and an anvil 30 will be the perfect combo for my ATX setup as well as hunting with the LRH
Yes. I think you’d be very happy with that setup.
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork Thank you sir. It's on the list for black friday haha
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork Joel with area 419’s discount i could have the recon V2 and the arca clamp with the two vets head for right at $800. Should i do that or just buy the tripod and grab an anvil 30
I’m just starting my journey with long range shooting and I’m considering a tripod. I’m also a photographer and considering in converting a photography tripod for my rifle (Ruger precision). What’s your take on that? Thank you!
The issue with standard photography tripods is that they typically aren’t rated to hold the weight of a heavy rifle, especially the ballheads. Because of that, they are usually very wobbly to shoot off of. Certainly you can do it, but there are better tools for the job. These ones in the video are rated to 100lbs. Extremely stable. It’s more than enough for shooting and obviously will still work well for photo and video.
If you could only have one, which one would you choose?
I'd go with the Recon V2, but I'd put a RRS anvil 30 ballhead on it.
When showing the smaller tripod it didn't look like there was a ball head attached. So in saying that do these tripods come with the ball head and arca attachment or are those sold separately.
The prices are for tripod only.
If that vudoo was a 90 degree throw that be almost perfect build! 😉
My old one is the 90 and it’s better. This one has feeding issues.
what is the orange handle you have on the mdt weight?
They’re just too damn expensive. $650-$700 for a tripod is ridiculous.
The problem is that shooting long range off of anything “cheaper” simply doesn’t produce the same results. It’s the right tool for the job.
Carbon fiber is quite pricey. It is what it is. I use and 0311G from Shadowtech. Right now you can find them for $138.00. IT IS SIGNIFICANLY HEAVIER than anything carbon fiber, but its durable and rock steady.
Definitely not in affordable range 😂 but yes nice af
$650 is "affordability"? Wow...
I guess like everything, it's relative. When the upper end of this type of tripod from really right stuff sells for $1500 then yes this is affordable. If a $100 tripod seems like a stretch, then this $650 two vets will probably seem extreme. Different tools for different jobs.
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork who said "$100 tripod is a stretch?"
@@jeffallen3382 i did. I was just picking a number on the lower end, since $100 tripods are fairly common.
I guess it is affordable if someone else is buying it. signed church mouse
Everyone has a different idea of affordable I suppose. These aren’t even the most expensive.
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork yeaks
Affordability? It’s a stand you put your gun on that costs $1,000……
Sorry, but that’s being said by someone with little to no positional long range shooting experience and likely very little use of a tripod. (Please correct me if I’m wrong)
They are not all created equal.
Where quality meets affordability? Are you kidding me?
The high end tripod setup from really right stuff is $1500.
Unfortunately you gotta pay to play the game.
@@PrecisionRifleNetwork I get what you are saying. With that said, an 0311G from Shadowtech is every bit as tough and its $138.00
ITS NOWHERE NEAR AS LIGHT, but its less than a quarter of the price. I would love a carbon fiber tripod but for 630.00 I'll have to keep doing pushups.
Love the channel though, keep doing it well.
@@rdsii64 thanks. I used that tripod from Shadow Tech for years. It’s a great product. I still have it.
Then affordable probably shouldn’t be in the title.
@@blakemilford9128 that's what I was saying...