Actually Raven, the game is making it to the end AND getting the votes to win. This show is a social experiment and how you socialize matters. Both Paul and Josh showed ugliness in them but Josh was the lesser of two evils, although he fought with many of the jury members he also had good times with some of them to help make up for it. I'm glad Paul was held accountable for the abuse and harassment he inspired in the house. Either he lacked self awareness or was in denial but his deflecting and shifting the blame for the unnecessary aspects of his game cost him the win. He played a better strategic game but also got carried away with the power and influence he had in the house, didn't form strong enough bonds with the jurors he betrayed most, and miscalculated how they would vote which shows he didn't get to know them that well with all the time he had in the house with them. The immaturity of his minions Matt and Raven in the jury house didn't help his cause either. Gaslighting and insulting people doesn't make them see your point of view but that's all they do because that's all Paul did behind their backs. Matt and Raven had no reason to be salty compared to Mark, Elena, Jason, and Alex. They made it further because they weren't a threat in any way and got a free ride to jury by doing nothing. Mark was right, Matt was pathetic and a waste of a spot. He squandered an opportunity thousands of BB fans would've appreciated more and taken better advantage of, contributed nothing to the game except making it boring and predictable, and his high pitch voice was annoying. He was nearly a decade older than Paul but demonstrated the same childishness which was cringe to see. As the saying goes, beauty fades but dumb is forever. This is the season that broke the show for me and it's still hard to rewatch mere clips of it because of how painfully bad it was played, how toxic much of the cast was, and how heavily biased it was on the producer's end
Imo Paul deserved to win over Nicole, but not over Josh. The questioning here is CRAZY glazing and lying(whenever you're supposed to be honest), combined with the poor jury management and Josh seeing thru their game and using that to his advantage.
Nicole was on the verge of going home to first HOH and was in a perfect position to have allies/shields with strong competitors. The only time she was close to leaving was final 4 and final 3 but everyone underestimated her. I’m happy she won honestly even though I love Paul. I respect your decision because in my opinion it’s one of the best final twos in Big Brother
Yea no I defo credit Nicole's game, don't get me wrong. I'm certainly impressed with her strategies and under-the-radar gameplay. I just feel a certain level of respect for Paul's upfront and domaint approach rather than Nicole's alliance-shielders and underestimation approach that would make me feel better about voting for Paul in that instance. I'm glad you respect my opinion though, and I respect yours as well! I see where anybody would think Nicole's game was more worthy, it was a perfect final 2.
Paul’s gaslighting in the question period is crazy. Josh answered the questions straight forward and perfectly hats off to him
Raven and Matt were the most useless people in BB history.
"I am sitting down Matt"
HONESTLY REAL
honestly hearing paul answer he didnt deserve the win
He didn't answer. He half lied half dodged the question entirely.
He should won over Nicole
Matt raven and Kevin didn't win any comps
Actually Raven, the game is making it to the end AND getting the votes to win. This show is a social experiment and how you socialize matters. Both Paul and Josh showed ugliness in them but Josh was the lesser of two evils, although he fought with many of the jury members he also had good times with some of them to help make up for it. I'm glad Paul was held accountable for the abuse and harassment he inspired in the house. Either he lacked self awareness or was in denial but his deflecting and shifting the blame for the unnecessary aspects of his game cost him the win. He played a better strategic game but also got carried away with the power and influence he had in the house, didn't form strong enough bonds with the jurors he betrayed most, and miscalculated how they would vote which shows he didn't get to know them that well with all the time he had in the house with them. The immaturity of his minions Matt and Raven in the jury house didn't help his cause either. Gaslighting and insulting people doesn't make them see your point of view but that's all they do because that's all Paul did behind their backs. Matt and Raven had no reason to be salty compared to Mark, Elena, Jason, and Alex. They made it further because they weren't a threat in any way and got a free ride to jury by doing nothing. Mark was right, Matt was pathetic and a waste of a spot. He squandered an opportunity thousands of BB fans would've appreciated more and taken better advantage of, contributed nothing to the game except making it boring and predictable, and his high pitch voice was annoying. He was nearly a decade older than Paul but demonstrated the same childishness which was cringe to see. As the saying goes, beauty fades but dumb is forever. This is the season that broke the show for me and it's still hard to rewatch mere clips of it because of how painfully bad it was played, how toxic much of the cast was, and how heavily biased it was on the producer's end
Imo Paul deserved to win over Nicole, but not over Josh.
The questioning here is CRAZY glazing and lying(whenever you're supposed to be honest), combined with the poor jury management and Josh seeing thru their game and using that to his advantage.
Nicole was on the verge of going home to first HOH and was in a perfect position to have allies/shields with strong competitors. The only time she was close to leaving was final 4 and final 3 but everyone underestimated her. I’m happy she won honestly even though I love Paul. I respect your decision because in my opinion it’s one of the best final twos in Big Brother
Yea no I defo credit Nicole's game, don't get me wrong. I'm certainly impressed with her strategies and under-the-radar gameplay. I just feel a certain level of respect for Paul's upfront and domaint approach rather than Nicole's alliance-shielders and underestimation approach that would make me feel better about voting for Paul in that instance.
I'm glad you respect my opinion though, and I respect yours as well! I see where anybody would think Nicole's game was more worthy, it was a perfect final 2.
Who do you think would have won if it was paul and Christmas or Christmas and josh
Mark and Elena wouldn't have took Paul