This is ridiculous. Numbers are not chain links. You don't lose a number when you divide. You don't have to sacrafice one of your numbers to divide by two if you have even numbers.
it's not "5+4" It's 5+0.5+0.5+4. you have a link of 5 , a half link, a half link, and a link of 4 ! just because you cut a link in half does not mean that it does not exist, it just means that you have a link in two parts.
This person is completely wrong. Order-of-operations relates to evaluating equations. It doesn't apply to anything this he is showing in this video. The video at the link below describes what 'order-of-operations' is about. 6÷2(1+2) = ? Correct Answer Explained By Mathematician th-cam.com/video/URcUvFIUIhQ/w-d-xo.html
Nothing you said debunks PENDAS. Math and shop skills are two separate things.
Exactly. Many people WOULD try order of operations in contexts irrelevant to its intended purpose.
This is ridiculous. Numbers are not chain links. You don't lose a number when you divide. You don't have to sacrafice one of your numbers to divide by two if you have even numbers.
Numbers are not chain links, ... what are numbers?
it's not "5+4" It's 5+0.5+0.5+4. you have a link of 5 , a half link, a half link, and a link of 4 !
just because you cut a link in half does not mean that it does not exist, it just means that you have a link in two parts.
Yup, not making numbers non-existent
I like your examples. I've never agreed with the various orders of operations. I wrote equations from left to right and followed them that way.
This person is completely wrong. Order-of-operations relates to evaluating equations. It doesn't apply to anything this he is showing in this video.
The video at the link below describes what 'order-of-operations' is about.
6÷2(1+2) = ? Correct Answer Explained By Mathematician
th-cam.com/video/URcUvFIUIhQ/w-d-xo.html
Exactly. Many people WOULD try order of operations in contexts irrelevant to its intended purpose.
Five divided by two equals ten makes sense. This explanation does not.