Picasso became a child star, known for his incredible technique and for being able to replicate any painting, until he invented cubism. This painting, for example, represents evolution and the cycle of life. He first paints chromosomes or cells, then a plant, then a fish, then an animal (a chicken), and the last one is death.
People saying that this is a masterpiece and that it has a deeper meaning are literally getting trolled by Picasso Also keep your citations about the deeper meaning and interpretation and message to yourself I don’t care its not that deep…
Actually Picasso's art is an odd, yet an interesting one. The first one represent chromosomes or cells, 2nd a plant, 3rd a fish, 4th chicken and last is death. In short the art tells about life cycle and it's evolution from beginning to end.
That is EXACTLY what's happening here. Everyone saying the art here is shitty, are totally missing the point. He doesnt give a flying fuck about this painting. It's like someone saying "Bo Burnham is wearing a dirty white t-shirt in Inside, so he must be a gross shitty person." In reality, these arent abstract choices, just people that have given up on the rest of the world & simply do not give a shit anymore at all. He doodled this bullshit on purpose, because at that point it was hilarious that people would call his scribblings "art". That's the entire point.
@@velienne1319 well, if someone were to told you a kid drew that, i doubt that you will sing praises to that picture. The best art is the one where the most people can appreciate it objectively, not from a well known artist, where people force to interpret it. I mean i sure as hell would rather sell it if i can rather than put it on my wall. Heck, i would pay for someone to not place that painting on my wall
"What the hell, whose painting is this? It looks like shite." "It's Picaso's." "Wow what a masterpiece, it's genious. An abstract concept with deep meanings."
@@x0lct998 This is taken far out of context. First the man could not clone Velazquez at age 19, not even close. Frankly for a guy who started learning how to paint at age 7 from his father, who was a very solid painter in his own right, his work at 19 isn't very impressive. It's not like the guy had been painting for a month and started making masterpieces. To be fair, virtually all artists take years and a lot of hard work to develop real skills. Picasso never developed them, he had no interest in it, and there's nothing wrong with that, but to put his skill at 19 next to Velazquez is utterly ridiculous, Picasso never got as good as his father when it comes to realistic representational art much less Velazquez. Stop bullshitting people with that tired ass argument.
@@atenakehnaton3965 "realistic representational" painting is a parameter only for classic art, not for "how good a painter is". That's bullshit. So, you're both wrong.
The actual artistic capability of picasso was his ability to fool others into thinking his pieces were masterpieces Yeah, I'm aware he was an amazing artist but in the context of this comment im talking about the childish drawings he made
Obviously you dont know anything about picasso, he can paint in realism and draw in perfect proportion in his early years training, he said that he can do a Raphael within 4 years of training evident in his sketchbooks and on many accounts tho those art pieces are difficult to prove or find nowadays, but this is the art genre that he chose and make a legacy with and yet the only ones that is a fool is you.
Bro's having the time of his life painting and people experienced in neither creating art or observing it are arguing whether or not what he's doing is acceptable, whether it's art or not, like art or atists owe you something. Calling each other names like "sheep" or "simpleton" for disagreeing with one another. Beautiful.
So according to you people should: A. only paint for themselves and no one should have an opinion B. simply accept that every piece of art is good. Art is supposed to evoke a reaction. Stop being a baby and accept that art evokes strong reactions.
I was an infant too. I drew shits like this too. So I know this is trash. Can you tell me on what parameter this is good other than "wow he drew it this must worth billions"?
Same with the hitler paintings. I showed them to my classmates and they said that it was good.. Not until i said it was hitler's that they changed their decisions LMAOO
Art critics: “This painting has so many layered meanings. The child like joy combined with the anguish of a cynical adult. It’s like two worlds combining and challenging each other. Dancing on the canvas to create a conflict of emotion. The dark romantic reds, the clear fresh blues. Such a brave choice of colour palette that really draws the eye in. Almost hypnotises whoever is fortunate enough to experience this art in person. Questions the deeper meaning of the soul and when you walk away from this painting you almost leave with it a small piece of who you are. Truly remarkable. Estimated value? Priceless. Artist: paint go splosh.
Don't get me wrong what u say is pure shit. Imo ART REQUIRES EFFORT AND TIME. This is just an worthless art imo 24/11/21 I’ve learned about him now This guy is painting portraits when he was 15 And he created so many masterpiece when he was young and he knows every fukin technique so when he got old he started to draw like a child. But that doesn’t justify calling it an masterpiece, I still think it’s shit*y he can draw better if he wants but he doesn’t wants to. And I don’t think it’s worthless.
@@abstraqtphilosophy7357 Art so weird. Because I bet he could actually draw and paint really well, but this is the crap he likes to make. It's like...a filmmaker purposefully makes a shit movie, and everyone's like "It's a masterpiece. It's supposed to be bad. It was by design." Like...what? I don't care if they made it bad on purpose, that doesn't make it good. 🤣 But it seems more prevalent in art. Especially performance art. My god.
His artwork during his young age was amazingly realistic.its not supposed to look good to the naked eye but have different perspectives.thats why people pay for it as realistic art is just done with enough practice there's not a lot of room for creativity and meaning
@@KabirJagadale Bro I can do the same by closing my eyes. I infact do when I am listening to boring lectures and let my hand move. But I and most don't because we know deep down this is shit.
Picasso be like: "I'm famous whatever the fck I draw, they'll somehow manage to find meaning even though there aren't!" Still tho, Picasso is a great Painter
@@effortcivilengineersinteri3784 It's not hard to create random doodles on paper, he wasn't special. He was a man with no talent who was incredibly talented in using other people's foolishness.
@@ragnarrkasparsen2118 theres no talent in art lol this guy just worked his entire life and finally found a type of art he enjoyed, doesnt make it bad? anyone can make random doodles but nobody can paint exactly like picasso simply because theyre not him.
Yo, check out his earlier work. I thought the same, too, until I saw that he was a prodigy in art when he was in his youth. I think he decided to reverse his progression, that is why.
@@PensativosPodcast @Elijah Thank you guys so much for standing up for him. Picasso is incredibly talented. Just look at previous works - “realistic” artworks if you want to. 😉
When they say: "Wow, you paint like Picasso!" You really have to wonder whether they're saying as a compliment or downright telling you draw like a kindergartener...
@@themandarin9493 You have no idea about art history and the time period when Picasso did these where that style hadnt been popularized or even yet fully acknowledged in the art world. Look at Picassos full body of work and then talk...right now, you sound like a moron.
Absolutely, what makes stupid art valuable is the rich collectors 'friend' the evaluator. They inflate a normal piece of drawing as art and artificially put an attrocious price tag. This way a garbage piece is 'converted' into art and sold to museums or at auctions.
Because most artists are used to work in secluded studios and take their time on their work but he was surrounded by a film crew and that also the bloody french , and the reel was limited so i guess that's why it looks forced
Ummm, that was the point of his work. He always aspired to paint as loosely and as inventively as a child, for it is the child artist that is the purest artist (meaning free of pretention, pressure.) It is therefore no mistake that his work often has a childlike quality to it. That doesn't mean his work is bad or no better than a child's finger paintings. It simply means that he was willing to be different. And given that he was a virtuoso artist from very early on in his life, I think he more than earned the right.
pimppastorjj if it was without pressure, then what was the 5 min thing about? But Ye, the more u grow up, the tighter u get when u do art, his style is truely inspiring, love the looseness in his work
Yeah. From being that good as a kid, he probably got bored of structure and making perfect sketches after awhile. He wanted to explore unhindered creativity I think. IMO they should have allowed him more time, bring extra film and extra cameras ya dingus!
In a way he went from super realism to a much more exciting acid world with levels of meaning, almost like a comic book or manga artist where realism doesnt allow for the expression you want to convey.
What makes this painting so special is Picasso’s acknowledgment of a film being created and immediately shifting gears saying, “I’ve got something special for you.” Then proceeds to paint a 3 chapter film. The beauty is that this work is preserved as a filmic medium creating it a pure form of collaboration between Picasso and the director, Henri-Georges Cluzot.
😊 lol he would agree. The reason he drew like this in his later years was because he wanted to recapture the creativity of children. At least this is what i vaguely remember from art history class.
"It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child." -- Pablo Picasso Children are free in their creativity, as we grow up we lose that ability. It is a painters ultimate goal to get that ability back -- to be loose and free.
@@unaisunu1770 For me it's sad to don't care what people think unless you get paid. Maybe do what you want and don't care about people that don't believe in you is better I mean all care about is money make people dead inside, I prefer a rich life in knowledge and follow my own decisions to became the best in what I do. But, who knows in everycase we all gonna die. Do whatever it please you, because we all only live once.
@@danielarnao6931it does not matter if I care or don't care if it's a good painting it's good if it's bad it's bad. That's it don't fall into the trap of precieved value.. Picasso's painting is like the tulips business of east India company.
This is probably what he was saying in his head "Hmmmm im gonna make a fish" "Crap ok ok ill just turn it into a chicken" "Tf is this ok chilll chill illl just add some more lines in the middle" "WHY DOES IT LOOK LIKE A FACE" "You know what ill turn it into a demon guy idk" "Masterpiece"
So many blind masterpieces without meaning, what he mastered was giving them meaning whilst still having the same vibe of a kids painting. If you are unable to understand, grow up, get over it and look at his paintings again.
@@xescdelarosa3328 I once drew my dog going in heaven (I was scared of losing my dog back then). The meaning is that dogs go in heaven, can it become famous too?
@@stopfootage no it doesn’t, it means his brain dulled out over time, how is there a deep meaning, it says it took him ; years to paint like Raphael and a lifetime to do it like a child, there is no deeper meaning, it’s all displayed and said there
@@specimenezra3221 nah fam, its truly a masterpiece. As an artist myself, the way he drew the chicken face shows his dedication and inspires an encouraging story about life, art, and fantasy.
@@deadstylz bruh. “The way he drew the chicken face”, “journey of life”? The biggest bandwagon topic is Picasso and other artist that drew these shitty “abstract” art. “ bitch the way I drew the lines represents the 4 coming of the harmonious creation of god divinely allowing the movement of time through space and from space through time. This, is, beauty.” Like No bruv that’s a poorly drawn chicken with a face of a sun I used to draw in elementary school.
And he is! Pablo Picasso Quotes "It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child." You see right through the true intent of a genius. Let's appreciate our geniuses at home who happily create a masterpiece for us everyday.
@Fukushima Ghost That is a good question. I think it is extremely difficult with the current education system that requires and demands to comply with the systematically standardized and rigid education criteria that are set from kindergarten to high school. As parents, you can only delay so much and wish for the best.
@Fukushima Ghost Can't agree more. I believe in order for one to break free of one world, one has to see and feel that world inside and out, only then one can get enlightened to break free or broken in.
Yet if I painted something similar it would be thrown in the bin. Everything in a NAME. Banksy sold some of his works on a street corner (undercover)...most went unsold, some oy sold for a few quid. The irony is that some passers by insulted his work. Then days later he announced what he did. Now the owners of the pictures they purchased for next to nothing- have highly valuable peices of Banksy art. It's just like fashion brands...your buying into a name ONLY.
@@Vontonone ok. I call it trash, but for every intelligent person in this world- theres many other gullible people also. My children have painted better🤣
you wouldn't have. this is a man who spent his entire life looking at things and drawing them. so even though you may not see it, it shows in his drawings, regardless of the drawing's worth. a keen eye can tell this is someone skilled in drawing, even if he's only drawing childlike stuff. you can't make something like that come out in your drawing because you haven't looked at many things or drawn all your life or have that skill.
@@biosciencesi.b.collegepani2714 Picasso became a child star, known for his technique and for being able to replicate any painting, until he invented cubism. This painting, for example, represents evolution and the cycle of life. He first paints chromosomes or cells, then a plant, then a fish, then an animal (a chicken), and the last one is death.
but childrens drawings are actually amazing they draw what they see and what they feel, not what they logically know the object of drawing looks like, independent of the wish that it looked realistic they fill the paper up with peak human imagination agree or disagree, i dont care, you dont have to believe me regardless of it being true
This is the video that made me abandon realism and paint what I feel and imagine more than what I see. The best art video on TH-cam. All other tutorials are useless. All your art education is here if you know how to look.
Nah man, read the comments. Picasso was just trolling everybody by making his art nonstop for like 80 years. Clearly he was just joking, if it’s not Bob Ross creating a realistic Alaskan landscape 5000 times it’s a prank. Idk about you but these comments thinking Picasso himself considered this a masterpiece are hilarious to me. Nothing wrong with realism, but I’m glad you’re comfortable going the route that inevitably draws more criticism from the average person, it’s way more rewarding at the end of the day. Just looking at Picasso’s Blue Period, he was extremely depressed when he confined himself to what’s taught and traditional. No one bought any of it, not because he wasn’t talented, but because it showed no emotion other than depression. Had he not constantly reinvented his methods he wouldn’t be remembered at all. Good luck, being your most authentic, expressive version will make your art something you can one day look back at without any hint of shame. 🙂
@@kolo5836 everyone can do abstract art, but picasso was a really good artist, he did a lot of realism, i think he just trolled everyone because his paintings weren't successful but everyone liked it.
@@kolo5836 also abstract art is complex but when did right, which a lot of modern artists don't do, they think that technics aren't useful just like you.
It's never about how good or how esthetic you paint that makes you one of the greatests. It's never been the case. The ability to imagine does. The ability to never let the ability of imagination to die. That's what it means to be an artist.
I wrote this because many people and audience in the comment section are making fun of his childlike drawings but it's funny that when most of us are presented with a piece of blank paper and pen , there's nothing that comes to the mind and people will be thinking hard and hard what to paint and sketch. It's always that the vision and confidence surpasses.
@@NeujeuKonnen so do you think Picasso was joking around in the end? I think he was very serious in the beginning but the ending seem so ridiculous he finished paintings in 5 minutes.
Picasso was drawing renaissance level realistic paintings at age 15. Art class is supposed to teach you the fundamentals of art. Once you have mastered those, you can start to break them and explore different avenues. Picasso could paint better at age 15 than you will probably in your entire lifetime, so i think that he earned the right to paint whatever he wanted.
Picasso became a child star, known for his technique and for being able to replicate any painting, until he invented cubism. This painting, for example, represents evolution and the cycle of life. He first paints chromosomes or cells, then a plant, then a fish, then an animal (a chicken), and the last one is death.
I love reading the comments here with such strong reactions both good and bad. I think the term genius is a strong title to give anyone but I feel that if it applies here it’s because his work goes way beyond the final product. I think he is a genius because he lived the way he wanted without compromising and still managed to achieve recognition. I’m not mentioning fame or money as they are unimportant as far as creating art goes. I think if you make a piece of art and your thought process is about money then you have failed already. I understand some people have made lots of money from their work but it should never be the intention behind the work. There aren’t many people in life who can truly create just for themselves and still achieve a huge amount of recognition. For me personally that’s his genius, the ability to do whatever you feel with complete freedom, confidence and still achieve success. I personally love his work and it is a lot harder than you think to have his technical ability (see his early work), reach a very high standard of painting in a realistic fashion and then go back and essentially un-learn that skill or break the rules if you prefer. If you’re a novice then it’s easy to be crude and childlike as you don’t have the skill to do any better, but he has that skill and then seeks a more naive approach. Not only is that technically difficult but incredibly forward thinking for the time. It’s hard for any of us living now in this day and age to realise how different his work would have been in those days alongside other pioneering artists. His impact on art, graphic design and everything in between is so ingrained in our culture that’s it’s easy to just see the simplified childlike work and make a quick judgement upon it. I think that is one of the reasons soo many people come to have a greater appreciation for his work when they realise he could paint like a photograph if he chose to. It somehow justifies his later work. Another thing to keep in mind is that he was an explorer, someone willing to try different things and push boundaries. Even if you don’t like his work you have to give him credit for opening up a whole world of experimentation for artists around the globe. He gave us all a ticket to be free and actually have fun whilst we are working! If you like art but have maybe dismissed his work, spend some time at one of the many museums/galleries that house some of his paintings and you might just be surprised what you learn about him. 🙂
All his paintings are an insult to Art. this ENTIRE "modern art" agenda was/is a mocking of Art, Beauty andd Humanity. Picasso was as much an artist as i am an astronaut.
@@adamfirst3772 I'm sure you're feeling pretty special right now for having a "special opinion". Just Google Picasso paintings and see the pieces he has created (I'm sure you'll find at least one piece that's pleasing to your eyes, yet you'll choose to not believe your brain, to stick to your opinion). Sure, call him a shit artist, but no other artist can paint like that, no matter how hard they try
DimBulb yeah, you are right, this is the fuist time i've seen a Picasso painting... in my 50+ years. that is how INSIGNIFICANT this "famous" "artist" is. is THAT your assertion?.. and no, there are ABSOLUTELY zero paintings of his that is "pleasing to my eyes".. that was the WHOLE objective of his "art".. to be an ASSAULT on the senses. and there's nothing "special" about my opinion, its just MY opinion. which im FREE to share. just like you felt the need to share your "not so special" opinion. and unlike you, i have sincerety, meaning i will change my opinions as truth is revealed to me. you might want to recheck your DOGMATIC "opinions", however. and your last assertion, that no one else can paint like him.. .. THANK GOD!!!!! but, my 8 year old son cant paint either, still, no one can paint like him. so, is he a Picasso too?..
Its not a masterpiece is it? Its misleading to say everything is a masterpiece because Pablo did it, its a drawing. Dont belittle the viewer and Picasso .
So you'd turn up your nose at a plate of scrambled eggs thrown together for you by a master chef ? Its a lovely work and all the better for having seen it being made. Sad how people can be so cynical in a world with a finite amount of beauty.
@@stevewalker6240 uh. No .. that's not the definition. Masterpiece... a piece made by a master. Or "a work of outstanding artistry, skill, or workmanship"
You Should have seen how he painted as a little kid. Pretty on par with a lot of Renaissance era art. He purpously painted this way when he go older. Once you become a master you can break the rules. There's a lot of complex compositional stuff going on even if it does look "childish".
@@paulohara4153 Could you explain to us the composition behind the painting? I'm just asking because I'd like to know more about Picasso and well, it's enough to read the comments to realize that his art is pretty controversial and probably misunderstood.
@@juanthi3745 Yes, definitely misunderstood. Picasso, Miro, Malevich all could paint like Renaissance masters. You can find their early works. What happened is, humanity progressed and photography was invented. So painting like real life was no longer was the hot thing-because photographs could do it better anyway. So they explored the idea of simplicity. You can draw a a chicken like a classical painter but for example for picasso, if you can understand that is a chicken by just lines, why do it otherwise? And dont forget all the other things going around in the world, all the scientific progress, philosophy etc. Painters did not want to paint like 500 years ago. Just as scientists did not want to experiment like 500 years ago. People often forget the era, and think like I can paint like them. Then do it. It doesnt matter now. Nobody will notice. But at that time, it was revolutionary. Art was almost same for 1000 years and it needed a change. Like it or not. And for all people saying I can do that, please do try. 99% of you will not. Because making a drawing/painting abstract requires a solid painting foundation. You cannot simplify a thing unless you know it very well.
Art is not about perfect composition it is about exploring anything new. All prominent artists popularized some particular style. Once the worlds eye casts its gaze upon the artist the enigma is manifested.
THANK YOU. Most of these comments have such a conservative view on art and creativity, it's such a shame. It's like they see art as a talent competition, rather than a creative outlet.
It was all fun and games until you realize it was actually The Evolution of Life 0:50 Bacteria 0:56 Plant(algae) 1:00 Fish 1:08 Chicken 1:53 Human Edit: 3:00 Hell(Death)
@@obeseduck3861 according to google artist is someone who creates art in the form of painting, music , sculpture or writing so technically they are correct
What I understand is that he was given 5 minutes and told the story of the human race from beginning to end. He started to draw the bacteria, that turned into a fish, then the roots of a tree with the blue sky and the earth that gave legs to the chicken that turned into a human face that became a devil and the end is up to interpretation…
@@amishmaknojiya9775 he painted like 5 things in just one painting, the painting itself is shit for sure, but the idea of painting bacteria, then a plant, then fish, then a chicken, then a face, and then what seems to be kind of a demonic face, with people around it, in the same painting, all hidden in the final product, that's pretty cool.
To be honest, Picasso started off as a "normal" type of artist painting the typical portfolio of a typical art student, but to him it wasn't original, to be original he had to push the form beyond Van Gogh, Gauguin, Cezanne, Matisse, Monet etc he had to "move" it forward to next level to be an original, therefore overtime he developed his cubist style which despite what you think is actually extraordinary high in the philosophy and theory of painting as it relates to human nature, interior, design, architecture, psychology, politics, propaganda, etc, his work may seem childish but in fact it is extremely difficult to achieve his work without being a genius operating of a level of higher consciousness with a high mind for the philosophy of painting, Picasso like all "masters" are philosophers first painters second they are just philosopher of painting as opposed to philosophers of language and mind such as Wittgenstein, painting is how they express their philosophical beliefs as opposed to academic papers such as Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, this painting in this video I agree is not his best and I wouldn't consider it however it is a Picasso and due to his other masterpieces and reputation it therefore has value, and to label his style 6th grand is ridiculous you obviously never seen the Guernica if you think such, I suggest researching his work and educating yourself in the metaphysics of painting to really appreciate the work of Picasso.
@@AEZaubermann I was just joking. I went to my local art institute this year and got to see paintings from the 1500 and 1600s. It's amazing that they were capable of that level of ability that long ago.
There have bin any number of artists, philosophers, and collectors, who have echoed or said this about High-End Art like this, "Art Is Anything You Can Get Away With" Marshall McLuhan.
@Natalie Wayne its not about painting better or skill, its about the message / what it represents. a lot of people think its lazy or bad but they just dont understand
@Natalie Wayne modern art more focus on expressing passion than follow a rule of beauty. That's why renaissance painting and modern painting so different, because renaissance painting follow the rule of beauty. Also what makes a painting is valuable isn't just about the paint, but who made the paint. Because, paint just like a history of experience of the painter. That's why if you see Pablo Picasso painting when he was 17th you would know how experience can change painter.
![“อาร์ต พศุตม์” เกือบเอี่ยวทุกคดีดัง เอ๊ะไว้ก่อน ไม่มีอะไรได้มาง่ายๆ | แฉ 16 ต.ค. 67 [2/3] | GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0Gx-0-kUBv8/mqdefault.jpg)
: What's this random shit?
: It's from Picasso.
: what a goddamm masterpiece.
😂 lol..
Copied and pasted comment
Copied :/
Who cares if it's copied, it's funny
Hello mr.copied-comment
Welcome to McDonald's
"Wow this is a beautiful art with deep meaning!"
Picasso: *"hehe, chicken face"*
He kills me when he looks into the camera with his ironic face as he said: "they think im a real artist ahah"
HeHe, cHiCkEn fAcE. I lUv cHiCkEnS! GiMmE cHiCkENs! YaY, PaBlO pIcAsSo! :3
❄️❄️❄️❄️❄️❄️❄️
@@streetadvisor8127 😂😂
Picasso became a child star, known for his incredible technique and for being able to replicate any painting, until he invented cubism. This painting, for example, represents evolution and the cycle of life. He first paints chromosomes or cells, then a plant, then a fish, then an animal (a chicken), and the last one is death.
Everyone: this painting has a deep meaning
Meanwhile the painting: 🌻🐟🐔😃
Meaning samjha mujhe...!!!
Less 😃 and more 😈
That is the deep meaning.
@@Inkedalic3 sarcasm moment
@@PhysicsVedaa eat steak
I legit shouted "No!" when Picasso painted over the chicken's face
U mean the face he drew on top of the chicken when it was too much work to draw the feathers?
People:oh look, he is a master of art and every stroke is carefully planned
Piccaso in head:"doo du du du du doo...what should i eat for lunch..."
Peobably Pizza
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Fried chicken 🍗🐓
Some fish n chips, chicken wings and blackberry
WORLD RECORD SPEEDRUN FOR RANDOM PICTURE IN 5 MINS Dudududu
People saying that this is a masterpiece and that it has a deeper meaning are literally getting trolled by Picasso
Also keep your citations about the deeper meaning and interpretation and message to yourself I don’t care its not that deep…
He genuinely made good paintings but at this point it was just name value
He realized he can just paint whatever crap effortlessly and people will still overvaluing his painting because it's his
Yeah this was just a really bad and contrived piece, very forced. What happens when you get stuck in a groove and lose your true creative flow.
He did a little bit of trolling
@@Mehmet-no6cz yea because the director lied to him about the time
"Every painting have a meaning"
Picasso : 🐟🐔🌚
🤣🤣🤣..your name makes the comment even better
Actually Picasso's art is an odd, yet an interesting one. The first one represent chromosomes or cells, 2nd a plant, 3rd a fish, 4th chicken and last is death. In short the art tells about life cycle and it's evolution from beginning to end.
@@richie4203 woww.. Damn thats deep
Honestly, his paintings are the best paintings I've ever seen, its so interesting and unique. I've never seen people paint like that before.
@@richie4203 Interesting.. Good to know..
He's probably about 200 years younger than I thought he'd be, ngl I thought he was some ancient historical figure lol
Are you a Gen Z/Alpha ?
He never forgot his art training from kindergarten.
It has meanings
So Eine schlecte bild ich habe noch nicht gesehen wer sagt er war grosse maller,mein kind jeden tag macht solche bilder
@@muratdogan8107 jeder lehrer bekommt gerade einen schlaganfall beim versuch diesen satz zu lesen 🤣
@yandy valdes it was new then, something no one had ever done, now everyone does it.
@@stelinthokchom560 I dont buy fucking meanings, i buy looks
I feel like at some point in his career Picasso decided "I'm going to paint random shit & see what I get away with"
That is EXACTLY what's happening here. Everyone saying the art here is shitty, are totally missing the point. He doesnt give a flying fuck about this painting. It's like someone saying "Bo Burnham is wearing a dirty white t-shirt in Inside, so he must be a gross shitty person." In reality, these arent abstract choices, just people that have given up on the rest of the world & simply do not give a shit anymore at all. He doodled this bullshit on purpose, because at that point it was hilarious that people would call his scribblings "art". That's the entire point.
@@jojoversus1100 r u sure?
@@jojoversus1100 we just don't understand why they are so expensive
@@rozie5642 neither did Picasso.
@@jojoversus1100 he forgor 💀
Art teacher : ''Its ok we're not all Picasso's"
Meanwhile Picasso:
My art teacher had always told us this in our class,and now laughed so hard on it.
@Leticia Cueto tbf his early works did look really good
@@humerausman6460 You guys don't understand that Picasso was a master at academic art. he was just bored
@@velienne1319 still that thing looks bad
@@velienne1319 well, if someone were to told you a kid drew that, i doubt that you will sing praises to that picture. The best art is the one where the most people can appreciate it objectively, not from a well known artist, where people force to interpret it.
I mean i sure as hell would rather sell it if i can rather than put it on my wall. Heck, i would pay for someone to not place that painting on my wall
Picasso’s work doesn’t irritate me. People who toss their kids drawings then stare a picassos work for 30 min irritate me.
😂
😂😂
Picasso trolling people for five minutes straight .
😂😂😂
He reminds me of my childhood self, how a bad of an artist I was
true \\
😅🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@lly_09 Yeah it's like he's high
"What the hell, whose painting is this? It looks like shite."
"It's Picaso's."
"Wow what a masterpiece, it's genious. An abstract concept with deep meanings."
Hhhhhhhhh
true af . that's what I was thinking
If you have grounds to say that, go watch Picasso's earlier artworks and try doing it yourself :)
Oy, i already wrote it's a masterpiece. Don't you all read my comment?
@@stepaniero What's the meaning then?
“He made the piece in just 5 minutes”. Yeah, I can tell.
Straight up whats so special bout this
He would have replied ''not in 5 minutes.60 years +5 minutes.''
@@yusufaksoy3697 it's funny how yall are hating on him but can any of you clone a Velazquez at age 19??? Yeah I think not
@@x0lct998 This is taken far out of context. First the man could not clone Velazquez at age 19, not even close. Frankly for a guy who started learning how to paint at age 7 from his father, who was a very solid painter in his own right, his work at 19 isn't very impressive. It's not like the guy had been painting for a month and started making masterpieces. To be fair, virtually all artists take years and a lot of hard work to develop real skills. Picasso never developed them, he had no interest in it, and there's nothing wrong with that, but to put his skill at 19 next to Velazquez is utterly ridiculous, Picasso never got as good as his father when it comes to realistic representational art much less Velazquez. Stop bullshitting people with that tired ass argument.
@@atenakehnaton3965 "realistic representational" painting is a parameter only for classic art, not for "how good a painter is". That's bullshit. So, you're both wrong.
The actual artistic capability of picasso was his ability to fool others into thinking his pieces were masterpieces
Yeah, I'm aware he was an amazing artist but in the context of this comment im talking about the childish drawings he made
Manipulator
I seen much worst.. People thinks a piece of blank paper is an art too..
Obviously you dont know anything about picasso, he can paint in realism and draw in perfect proportion in his early years training, he said that he can do a Raphael within 4 years of training evident in his sketchbooks and on many accounts tho those art pieces are difficult to prove or find nowadays, but this is the art genre that he chose and make a legacy with and yet the only ones that is a fool is you.
Nah bro he was good at realistic art too, He wanted to express himself in his own artstyle,
@@abcd-zl4rn his art style look like shit.
It feels like a horror film, where they’re forcing him to paint.
That painting looks like something out of horror film
"Hello Picasso, I was hoping you and I could play game"
I thought it was a mafia movie, but I don’t speak French so I imagined they were speaking Italian 🤣🤣🤣
Lol back in the day that was cake talk
@@griffinoleary1694 what are you ok?
The picture quality is still better than most "ghost caught on tape" videos
because it's film that has been well preserved vs mobile phone cameras
🤣🤣🤣
lmao
and UFO's
Ufo included 🌝
Art, truly in the eye of the beholder.
This guy is about 300 years younger than I thought.
😂😂😂🤜🔥🔥🔥
Me too 🤣 my husband and I are cracking up.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
HAHHAAHA
Ikr
Bro's having the time of his life painting and people experienced in neither creating art or observing it are arguing whether or not what he's doing is acceptable, whether it's art or not, like art or atists owe you something. Calling each other names like "sheep" or "simpleton" for disagreeing with one another. Beautiful.
Artists don't owe us anything we're making fun of how stupid everything is picasso, the painting, people holding it to such a high degree 😂 It's funny
So according to you people should: A. only paint for themselves and no one should have an opinion B. simply accept that every piece of art is good.
Art is supposed to evoke a reaction. Stop being a baby and accept that art evokes strong reactions.
@@rishikamath6718C: Keep your mouth shut and try to accept your ignorance and learn from other people.
I suppose babies cannot do that.
@@niki1990its not stupid, its just different art, not worsr
I was an infant too. I drew shits like this too. So I know this is trash. Can you tell me on what parameter this is good other than "wow he drew it this must worth billions"?
Deep meaning: Even a huge monster is a chicken inside.
And every chicken turns into a demon
@@ogvamp2 and the demon is severely racist and homophobic!!!1
@@pyroteknikk3127 i- i don't understand
Wow. Picasso is amazing.
Genius 😂😂
" bruh who painted this garbage"
" It was made by Picasso"
" Beautiful, absolutely magnificent. So creative and such a master piece"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Don't forget the deep emotional meanings of the painting
Same with the hitler paintings. I showed them to my classmates and they said that it was good.. Not until i said it was hitler's that they changed their decisions LMAOO
@@thewind9177 you said that cz it was painted by Picasso...if it was someone else then...God knows the comments😂🦸
World need a nameless artist
Art critics: “This painting has so many layered meanings. The child like joy combined with the anguish of a cynical adult. It’s like two worlds combining and challenging each other. Dancing on the canvas to create a conflict of emotion. The dark romantic reds, the clear fresh blues. Such a brave choice of colour palette that really draws the eye in. Almost hypnotises whoever is fortunate enough to experience this art in person. Questions the deeper meaning of the soul and when you walk away from this painting you almost leave with it a small piece of who you are. Truly remarkable. Estimated value? Priceless.
Artist: paint go splosh.
Don't get me wrong what u say is pure shit.
Imo ART REQUIRES EFFORT AND TIME.
This is just an worthless art imo
24/11/21
I’ve learned about him now
This guy is painting portraits when he was 15
And he created so many masterpiece when he was young and he knows every fukin technique so when he got old he started to draw like a child. But that doesn’t justify calling it an masterpiece, I still think it’s shit*y he can draw better if he wants but he doesn’t wants to. And I don’t think it’s worthless.
Fookin shite mayte
Just paint it black mate
@@mohamedaslam7809 he got the joke guys. lets congratulate him
When question carries 10 marks but you dont fucking know anything, so you decide to wrote craps from all around the world world in one para
Masterpiece is a strong word.
His paintings are insults to the word masterpiece.
@@abstraqtphilosophy7357 Art so weird. Because I bet he could actually draw and paint really well, but this is the crap he likes to make. It's like...a filmmaker purposefully makes a shit movie, and everyone's like "It's a masterpiece. It's supposed to be bad. It was by design." Like...what? I don't care if they made it bad on purpose, that doesn't make it good. 🤣 But it seems more prevalent in art. Especially performance art. My god.
His artwork during his young age was amazingly realistic.its not supposed to look good to the naked eye but have different perspectives.thats why people pay for it as realistic art is just done with enough practice there's not a lot of room for creativity and meaning
@@KabirJagadale
Bro I can do the same by closing my eyes. I infact do when I am listening to boring lectures and let my hand move. But I and most don't because we know deep down this is shit.
i feel like he was just trolling everyone
Lmao
His whole life
Same
Picasso be like: "I'm famous whatever the fck I draw, they'll somehow manage to find meaning even though there aren't!"
Still tho, Picasso is a great Painter
ACTUALLY I MYSELF FEEL TROLLED THE MOST BECAUSE I WAS WATCHING SO CAREFULLY TO FIND OUT THE MEANING
"taking it from a fish to a chicken to a face"
He literally just drew a smiley face over a chicken
😂😂😂 fucken terrible
I laughed out loud 😂😂
no!!! He absolutely transformed that chicken into a face!! such a great artist!!
🤣🤣🤣
@@ogvamp2 its sarcasm right?
One man’s masterpiece is another man’s childlike scribbling.
Deep!
Deep!
too Deep!
True though. Art is very subjective.
Deep!
" It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child. "
- verse by Picasso
I just realized that everything my son has been drawing is a masterpiece
You should have realized that the second they gave it to you. Even if it’s a line the master piece came from your child
Everything human create is art. Keep supporting ypur kid art.🌺
it's true tho. only children can draw this type of masterpieces. except for Picasso, that's why he is special
@@effortcivilengineersinteri3784
It's not hard to create random doodles on paper, he wasn't special. He was a man with no talent who was incredibly talented in using other people's foolishness.
@@ragnarrkasparsen2118 theres no talent in art lol this guy just worked his entire life and finally found a type of art he enjoyed, doesnt make it bad? anyone can make random doodles but nobody can paint exactly like picasso simply because theyre not him.
I feel like he trolled the entire art world till the last breath....
best commant under this video for real dawg
😂👌🏾😆
And cause he also beats his multiple wives, some of em are probably still alive, one of them is Gilot
Who's the fool? What is art anyhow
Have you seen dushamp or any artist from dada
Masterpiece: cost 1 million dollars.
The masterpiece 🐔🐟🌚🌿
😂😂😂😂
This is shit 😆😂😁
Shit, he earned easy
@@lly_09 he didn't earn anything, he died poor, but his art is worth a lot after his death
😂😂
Someone needs to teach this guy how to draw.
he knew how to alright, look up his earlier works, very realistic
Yo, check out his earlier work. I thought the same, too, until I saw that he was a prodigy in art when he was in his youth. I think he decided to reverse his progression, that is why.
the joke flew over this reply section's heads
Based.
im actually convinced this comment section has never seen a picasso painting in their lives
Idk bout the painting but the filmmaking was amazing for that time
Even I can draw whether on my instagram smh, this is for from being considered good
Lol wym for that time? When do you think this was?
@@non-binaryeugene733 1800 AD. I legit used to think as a child that Picasso must have been friends with Leonardo Dicaprio.
@@raghavrdxduggal Honestly, I'm so glad I'm not the only one who thought that. When I found out he wasn't born in the Renaissance, I was in denial. 😅
Is he real Picaso?????? oh wow
"It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child."
-Picasso
Many people here don’t know that Picasso could paint realism amazingly and then he said this, thanks for not being just an ignorant judge
@NS I if you think that this video is his realism you're dumb
It took me a year and some crayons...Picasso is a joke
@@xxlonewolfxx7908 kinda feel bad for u tbh. U have to learn how to see art, art is not literal, it has feelings and u have to interpret it.
@@PensativosPodcast @Elijah Thank you guys so much for standing up for him. Picasso is incredibly talented. Just look at previous works - “realistic” artworks if you want to. 😉
When they say: "Wow, you paint like Picasso!" You really have to wonder whether they're saying as a compliment or downright telling you draw like a kindergartener...
I get it too 😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
I mean, to be fair. His early work look realistic, not like this. So if people telling me that, I take that as a compliment lol
@@giantalbinoeel I want to say that too . .
Back in school, my friends used to call me "the Picasso" of our class. I used to feel proud back then... but after watching this :/😬
One of the most successful con artists of the 20th century.
Facts!!!
only to dumb people lol
He’s a “con artist” because rich pretentious people allow themselves to be conned.
I spent 3 days trying to recreate this, showed it to my family and got treated like an idiot
Rip
Now, who would like to pay millions of dollars for this painting? What? No takers?
never. just create what you wanted
@@ahmadhrdzararman4303 i created a video so pls check it out :D
@@themandarin9493 You have no idea about art history and the time period when Picasso did these where that style hadnt been popularized or even yet fully acknowledged in the art world. Look at Picassos full body of work and then talk...right now, you sound like a moron.
If nobody told you it was a masterpiece, you would probably trash it.
if i couldnt sell it because its a picasso i would trash it, that was garbage
I wouldn’t
If somebody told me that it was a masterpiece, I'd probably trash them.
Absolutely, what makes stupid art valuable is the rich collectors 'friend' the evaluator. They inflate a normal piece of drawing as art and artificially put an attrocious price tag. This way a garbage piece is 'converted' into art and sold to museums or at auctions.
Ur probably some brat that would do that :P
Idk why, but this looks like he was captured by mafia and thy force him to do a painting.
Hahaha
You right
yeah XD
Because most artists are used to work in secluded studios and take their time on their work but he was surrounded by a film crew and that also the bloody french , and the reel was limited so i guess that's why it looks forced
1:20 he hadded squidward
who grow up and then go back to childhood times can relate his art more
“Hello, I’m Pablo Picasso and you’re watching Disney Chanel”
🤣😂
😝😝😝
🤣🤣🤣
😁😁😁😁
😂😂😂
Let’s be honest, it looks like something a kid would do and if that wasn’t a Picasso we’d be calling it shit
Ummm, that was the point of his work. He always aspired to paint as loosely and as inventively as a child, for it is the child artist that is the purest artist (meaning free of pretention, pressure.) It is therefore no mistake that his work often has a childlike quality to it. That doesn't mean his work is bad or no better than a child's finger paintings. It simply means that he was willing to be different. And given that he was a virtuoso artist from very early on in his life, I think he more than earned the right.
pimppastorjj if it was without pressure, then what was the 5 min thing about? But Ye, the more u grow up, the tighter u get when u do art, his style is truely inspiring, love the looseness in his work
Yeah. From being that good as a kid, he probably got bored of structure and making perfect sketches after awhile. He wanted to explore unhindered creativity I think. IMO they should have allowed him more time, bring extra film and extra cameras ya dingus!
In a way he went from super realism to a much more exciting acid world with levels of meaning, almost like a comic book or manga artist where realism doesnt allow for the expression you want to convey.
I’m still calling it shit
"It took me four years to paint like Raphael, a lifetime to paint like a child." ~ Pablo Picasso ~
I'd say syphilis had a lot to do with his brain deteriorating back into a child state.
Such an incredibly arrogant quote holy shit
That shit's funny I thought I was the only one thinking that Haha
What's making special from this painting?
@@eyjafjalajokull9046 why tho
What makes this painting so special is Picasso’s acknowledgment of a film being created and immediately shifting gears saying, “I’ve got something special for you.” Then proceeds to paint a 3 chapter film.
The beauty is that this work is preserved as a filmic medium creating it a pure form of collaboration between Picasso and the director, Henri-Georges Cluzot.
Are you trying to convince yourself?
Exactly
I don't see the beauty neither will any rational creature of this world
he's not gonna let you smash bro
Oh shut up with your verbose drivel, even he knew this was meaningless garbage.
Picasso’s got nothing on my Kindergarten art class projects.
He would have agreed!
😊 lol he would agree. The reason he drew like this in his later years was because he wanted to recapture the creativity of children. At least this is what i vaguely remember from art history class.
I agree! Because that's what it looks like. Like a child could of done that.
My old art teacher would give him an E for that painting, at the VERY LEAST. Maybe fail him too lol.
@@seanodanielsart smh that's why people don't even consider art
Picasso would've have been trolled hard if he lived in the internet era.
He was the one trolling...
@@user-ux9ek8fn5f 😂😂
True !
Cause this shit is garbage & he woulda made sports contract money in this era smh
@@fireinjunred ok big guy, let the famous painter who popularised the idea of stylistic interpretation to world paint what he wants.
"It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child." -- Pablo Picasso
Children are free in their creativity, as we grow up we lose that ability. It is a painters ultimate goal to get that ability back -- to be loose and free.
Well I can paint like that easyilly , if iam getting paid for it I don't care what people think.
If someone painted something like this you'd still call it's shit!
@@unaisunu1770 For me it's sad to don't care what people think unless you get paid. Maybe do what you want and don't care about people that don't believe in you is better I mean all care about is money make people dead inside, I prefer a rich life in knowledge and follow my own decisions to became the best in what I do. But, who knows in everycase we all gonna die. Do whatever it please you, because we all only live once.
@@danielarnao6931it does not matter if I care or don't care if it's a good painting it's good if it's bad it's bad. That's it don't fall into the trap of precieved value.. Picasso's painting is like the tulips business of east India company.
Nah me and every single other adult I know still paint like 8 year old kids.
The fact that a chicken with a mean looking fella over top has so many people upset is what is most impressive
The meanings in his art is that "people are stupid."
Lmao
Fact tho
Hahahahaha 🤣
Omg🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🖤
😂😂😂
My coworker did some similar drawings during lunch break, we haven't stopped laughing for a week
Show them in Patreon! Not Twitter. You'd get patrons who'd pay to see more of those.
Hahah good one, mate
My toddler and Picasso have same style.
This is probably what he was saying in his head
"Hmmmm im gonna make a fish"
"Crap ok ok ill just turn it into a chicken"
"Tf is this ok chilll chill illl just add some more lines in the middle"
"WHY DOES IT LOOK LIKE A FACE"
"You know what ill turn it into a demon guy idk"
"Masterpiece"
Underrated 😂
Best comment ever 😂😂
jajajajajajajajajajajaja
I was thinking something like that 😂😂
Hahahaha
The greatest prankster ever. What a legend!!
Now i realize all my drawing are worth millions 🤞🏼
No they are not. They are worth shit.
(Adrian bro sorry, mine are too 😉)
Nope, He is just trolling in here
Is he wrong tho?
Just need a GOAT to buy it ...🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@@Shome2049 lmao
After watch this, I remember when I was a kid, I made so many masterpiece's
I still have them, if I had the reputation, I could still sell them for millions 😔
yeah me too , but no one is gonna pay us 1000000 for one of them ,why? ..that's funny you'll never find out.
Not really.
So many blind masterpieces without meaning, what he mastered was giving them meaning whilst still having the same vibe of a kids painting. If you are unable to understand, grow up, get over it and look at his paintings again.
@@xescdelarosa3328 I once drew my dog going in heaven (I was scared of losing my dog back then). The meaning is that dogs go in heaven, can it become famous too?
Picasso: throws up on the canvas
Everyone: "Masterpiece!"
Thats exacly what he did shit on a canvas
Everyone : i can see a deep meaning of it
"it took me 4 years to draw like rapheal, and a lifetime to draw like a child." -pablo piccasso
@@nizamakhtar7573 it has a deep meaning :)
This sum up how auction works
@@stopfootage no it doesn’t, it means his brain dulled out over time, how is there a deep meaning, it says it took him ; years to paint like Raphael and a lifetime to do it like a child, there is no deeper meaning, it’s all displayed and said there
the 1 minute and 8 seconds drawing is better than the last result 💀
The beauty lies within the eyes of the beholder, but stupidity lies within the willingness of the buyer.
Preach 👏
Best quotes I've heard
Woohoo
I will remember this. Thank you for the lesson.
😂😂😂😂
The only reason why Picasso’s paintings are masterpieces is because he paints topless
words
Now he’s the masterpiece 😏
When he need to use a thick brush he just uses his ******
Tits out for 'Casso
LMAO
Picasso throughout his life was not interested in art nearly as much as the creative process. This video exemplifies that
"He made the work in just five minutes"
I can believe that
@Johnny Dong Bruh, they said at the beginning that they only had five minutes to record, that's your proof.
Only 5 min, the proof ? It's ugly
@@specimenezra3221 nah fam, its truly a masterpiece. As an artist myself, the way he drew the chicken face shows his dedication and inspires an encouraging story about life, art, and fantasy.
@@deadstylz bruh. “The way he drew the chicken face”, “journey of life”? The biggest bandwagon topic is Picasso and other artist that drew these shitty “abstract” art. “ bitch the way I drew the lines represents the 4 coming of the harmonious creation of god divinely allowing the movement of time through space and from space through time. This, is, beauty.” Like No bruv that’s a poorly drawn chicken with a face of a sun I used to draw in elementary school.
*looks intently at my 3 year old’s painting on the fridge*
My god, he’s a prodigy
Your child's painting is worth millions😅😂
Can I buy it?
And he is!
Pablo Picasso Quotes
"It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child."
You see right through the true intent of a genius. Let's appreciate our geniuses at home who happily create a masterpiece for us everyday.
@Fukushima Ghost That is a good question. I think it is extremely difficult with the current education system that requires and demands to comply with the systematically standardized and rigid education criteria that are set from kindergarten to high school. As parents, you can only delay so much and wish for the best.
@Fukushima Ghost Can't agree more. I believe in order for one to break free of one world, one has to see and feel that world inside and out, only then one can get enlightened to break free or broken in.
*THIS GUY EXPLAINS THE TRUE MEANING OF BRAND NAME , ONCE YOU GET RECOGNISED NO MATTER WHAT YOU MAKE IT'S ALWAYS A MASTERPIECE.*
Exactly.
yep, people would pay a ton even if he just painting a dot on a white canvas
@@rararaka2348 and then they will say.....
"It has a very deep meaning....... only a true artist can understand it. oh wow!...."
My foot
When a piece of shit is called art, it is telltale sign of impending collapse of civilization.
@@rararaka2348 There's Minnie from (G)i-dle in your profile photo!!! She is my favourite memeber in (G)i-dle!!!
This is art.
Picasso is one of the most important artists ever
Yet if I painted something similar it would be thrown in the bin. Everything in a NAME. Banksy sold some of his works on a street corner (undercover)...most went unsold, some oy sold for a few quid. The irony is that some passers by insulted his work. Then days later he announced what he did. Now the owners of the pictures they purchased for next to nothing- have highly valuable peices of Banksy art. It's just like fashion brands...your buying into a name ONLY.
@@Sam-zu5mr picasso has achieved many things. Thats why he is an important artists. At the end this is what he thought of art, so its art.
@@Vontonone ok. I call it trash, but for every intelligent person in this world- theres many other gullible people also. My children have painted better🤣
You're a pretentious try hard and everything that's wrong with the art community
This guy is proof that rich people will buy anything as long as it is made by someone influencial
Fax
Exactly
As long as it is expensive.
"Art"
"This stickman was made by Winston Churchill."
If I had drawn the same thing everyone in the room would have died laughing
you wouldn't have. this is a man who spent his entire life looking at things and drawing them. so even though you may not see it, it shows in his drawings, regardless of the drawing's worth. a keen eye can tell this is someone skilled in drawing, even if he's only drawing childlike stuff. you can't make something like that come out in your drawing because you haven't looked at many things or drawn all your life or have that skill.
@@dailybls ease up man damn
@@biosciencesi.b.collegepani2714 you went from 100 to 0 real fast 😂
@@biosciencesi.b.collegepani2714 Picasso became a child star, known for his technique and for being able to replicate any painting, until he invented cubism. This painting, for example, represents evolution and the cycle of life. He first paints chromosomes or cells, then a plant, then a fish, then an animal (a chicken), and the last one is death.
@@dailybls Can you please explain about this painting because I didn't understand it.
No matter how special a person is or their creations are, this just looks like what a 6 year old would make in art time 💀
Couldnt agree more brug💀
Yeah this art is dogshit lmao everyone defending this saying only Picasso could make this garbage 🤣
For 5 minutes given and I’m not sure any prep time it’s not bad.
but childrens drawings are actually amazing
they draw what they see and what they feel, not what they logically know the object of drawing looks like, independent of the wish that it looked realistic they fill the paper up with peak human imagination
agree or disagree, i dont care, you dont have to believe me regardless of it being true
@@averageenjoyer7346 aight bruv
This is the video that made me abandon realism and paint what I feel and imagine more than what I see.
The best art video on TH-cam. All other tutorials are useless. All your art education is here if you know how to look.
Nah man, read the comments. Picasso was just trolling everybody by making his art nonstop for like 80 years. Clearly he was just joking, if it’s not Bob Ross creating a realistic Alaskan landscape 5000 times it’s a prank. Idk about you but these comments thinking Picasso himself considered this a masterpiece are hilarious to me. Nothing wrong with realism, but I’m glad you’re comfortable going the route that inevitably draws more criticism from the average person, it’s way more rewarding at the end of the day. Just looking at Picasso’s Blue Period, he was extremely depressed when he confined himself to what’s taught and traditional. No one bought any of it, not because he wasn’t talented, but because it showed no emotion other than depression. Had he not constantly reinvented his methods he wouldn’t be remembered at all. Good luck, being your most authentic, expressive version will make your art something you can one day look back at without any hint of shame. 🙂
You only have 5 minutes to draw your masterpiece
Picasso: 🐓
more like
🐓🌚
Fishickensmile
I think he had plenty of masterpieces by this point and was just messing around.
@@holliswilliams8426 probably since he was able to basically draw like Leonardo but chose not to
Any work that only spent 5 min to complete, shouldn't be a masterpiece
the person who paid millions for this: **hangs it up**
some visitor: oh that's so sweet, you frame your kids art
😂😂
it doesnt matter what picasso draws after he gets famous. that is the point of drawings. rich ppl buy their fame. not their drawings...
@@figuraclass444 thats so fckng true.
LOL🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@figuraclass444 Yup the dumbest portion of people are amongst the rich for sure.
He simply took advantage of mankind's ability to find patterns in everything.
"simply" this is abstract art. allowing for the most complex art after the lie of technicality is taken away
You here after watching Vsauce's spooky coincidences bro?
@@kolo5836 everyone can do abstract art, but picasso was a really good artist, he did a lot of realism, i think he just trolled everyone because his paintings weren't successful but everyone liked it.
@@kolo5836 also abstract art is complex but when did right, which a lot of modern artists don't do, they think that technics aren't useful just like you.
@@kolo5836 and still having a lot of Arts more complex than abstract painting, did you ever heard about Songs, Movies, Literature?
It's never about how good or how esthetic you paint that makes you one of the greatests. It's never been the case. The ability to imagine does. The ability to never let the ability of imagination to die. That's what it means to be an artist.
I wrote this because many people and audience in the comment section are making fun of his childlike drawings but it's funny that when most of us are presented with a piece of blank paper and pen , there's nothing that comes to the mind and people will be thinking hard and hard what to paint and sketch. It's always that the vision and confidence surpasses.
Okay Mr pretentious try hard
You get it. This comment section has a very conservative outlook on art and creativity, really sad to see tbh
Once I drew this picture in arts class and my teacher gave me an "F".
Fabulous
Fantastic
Amazing
could also stand for "F"enomenal
@@kiko6969 generally F is for respect
“I call it Bold and Brash”
“More like -Belongs in the trash-”
Just 16 likes, what's going on?
This comment is worth more than the art itself
"it took me 4 years to draw like raphael and a life time to draw like a child."
-pablo picasso
@@Gekumatz “hello, you’ve reached the house of unrecognized talent” -Squidward Tentacles
@Vishnu PM yes but instead he chose to create visual diarrhea.
I swear Picasso pulled off the longest prank of all time with some of his paintings. Absolutely genius, but not in the way the arty types mean it!
No wonder why it's call The Mystery of Picasso 💀💀
Literally look at his other paintings. Most of them are great.
@@Schnoz42069 which one? Whats the name
@@jasonlewis460 just look at the evolution of his self portraits. the dude knew what he was doing
@@NeujeuKonnen so do you think Picasso was joking around in the end? I think he was very serious in the beginning but the ending seem so ridiculous he finished paintings in 5 minutes.
And I get an “F” in my art class for this, with a “See me after class” note from my prof…
Million dollar art from him and a repeat of semester for me…
Picasso was drawing renaissance level realistic paintings at age 15. Art class is supposed to teach you the fundamentals of art. Once you have mastered those, you can start to break them and explore different avenues. Picasso could paint better at age 15 than you will probably in your entire lifetime, so i think that he earned the right to paint whatever he wanted.
Reasons why picasso's art are a masterpiece
-Art has deep meaning
-Random Painting
-Paints with No Shirt
Yeah, where did his shirt go anyway?
Mainly the last reason. Yes.
@J.R. Spingly wowow watch it there. You dont wanna deliver your opinions in a rude way. People may get offended
@@adog5999 when u do drugs u get hot n paint weird shit lol its a joke but they did that with an artist n lsd as an experiment
I like in last point. I think i will do like what Pablo do.
Picasso when in school
Teacher: YOUR ART SUCKS
picasso: *Uno reverse card*
He is a great artist actually, he just prefered doing this type of art
I copied this painting in my school art competition but my master piece was thrown in dustbin. 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
@@sujalghorse4088 lol
That’s not called great art, but instead great businessman.
_Meanwhile Hitler_
Art school: sorry we don't accept you
Hitler few years later:
“You can’t rush art.”
Meanwhile,
Most underrated comment here
Tbf tho he rushed this one
Haha
Speedrun art time: ('$"??:🐟"!$":?'$"🐔⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️🌚
Picasso became a child star, known for his technique and for being able to replicate any painting, until he invented cubism. This painting, for example, represents evolution and the cycle of life. He first paints chromosomes or cells, then a plant, then a fish, then an animal (a chicken), and the last one is death.
I love reading the comments here with such strong reactions both good and bad. I think the term genius is a strong title to give anyone but I feel that if it applies here it’s because his work goes way beyond the final product. I think he is a genius because he lived the way he wanted without compromising and still managed to achieve recognition. I’m not mentioning fame or money as they are unimportant as far as creating art goes. I think if you make a piece of art and your thought process is about money then you have failed already. I understand some people have made lots of money from their work but it should never be the intention behind the work. There aren’t many people in life who can truly create just for themselves and still achieve a huge amount of recognition. For me personally that’s his genius, the ability to do whatever you feel with complete freedom, confidence and still achieve success. I personally love his work and it is a lot harder than you think to have his technical ability (see his early work), reach a very high standard of painting in a realistic fashion and then go back and essentially un-learn that skill or break the rules if you prefer. If you’re a novice then it’s easy to be crude and childlike as you don’t have the skill to do any better, but he has that skill and then seeks a more naive approach. Not only is that technically difficult but incredibly forward thinking for the time. It’s hard for any of us living now in this day and age to realise how different his work would have been in those days alongside other pioneering artists. His impact on art, graphic design and everything in between is so ingrained in our culture that’s it’s easy to just see the simplified childlike work and make a quick judgement upon it. I think that is one of the reasons soo many people come to have a greater appreciation for his work when they realise he could paint like a photograph if he chose to. It somehow justifies his later work. Another thing to keep in mind is that he was an explorer, someone willing to try different things and push boundaries. Even if you don’t like his work you have to give him credit for opening up a whole world of experimentation for artists around the globe. He gave us all a ticket to be free and actually have fun whilst we are working! If you like art but have maybe dismissed his work, spend some time at one of the many museums/galleries that house some of his paintings and you might just be surprised what you learn about him. 🙂
Well put, rare to find such a thought reply in a comments section
Thanks! 🙂
Very well put
This is way more about the film itself than what he drew
Yes the film is an masterpiace but the people dont get It rigth wet
Yeah this is all about the film. Back then I’m sure this was groundbreaking stuff. People trashing his painting😹
@@germacam3498 I think someone said that he was trying to recapture the creativity of children and not really going for that realistic bob rossy vibe
Choco Bun i thought it was cool
His drawing isn’t particularly interesting tbh
I do know he's Picasso, but his painting here looks like he's trolling society lol
All his paintings are an insult to Art.
this ENTIRE "modern art" agenda was/is a mocking of Art, Beauty andd Humanity.
Picasso was as much an artist as i am an astronaut.
Children art
@@adamfirst3772 I'm sure you're feeling pretty special right now for having a "special opinion". Just Google Picasso paintings and see the pieces he has created (I'm sure you'll find at least one piece that's pleasing to your eyes, yet you'll choose to not believe your brain, to stick to your opinion). Sure, call him a shit artist, but no other artist can paint like that, no matter how hard they try
DimBulb
yeah, you are right, this is the fuist time i've seen a Picasso painting... in my 50+ years.
that is how INSIGNIFICANT this "famous" "artist" is. is THAT your assertion?..
and no, there are ABSOLUTELY zero paintings of his that is "pleasing to my eyes"..
that was the WHOLE objective of his "art".. to be an ASSAULT on the senses.
and there's nothing "special" about my opinion, its just MY opinion. which im FREE to share. just like you felt the need to share your "not so special" opinion.
and unlike you, i have sincerety, meaning i will change my opinions as truth is revealed to me.
you might want to recheck your DOGMATIC "opinions", however.
and your last assertion, that no one else can paint like him.. .. THANK GOD!!!!!
but, my 8 year old son cant paint either, still, no one can paint like him. so, is he a Picasso too?..
why do u think ur opinions matter on the fricking internet
Just stfu and enjoy the video you clicked
"I'll be honest with you, I have no idea what I am doing" Picasso, probably.
Lol yea
😂
XD
Picasso: *Paintings*
*5 minutes later*
Picasso: That would be $900.000
Imagine being so famous that any crappy doodle you make is called a masterpiece.
Impressive, very nice...
Let's see Paul Allen's doodle
Look at that subtle off-white colouring, the tasteful thickness of it, OMG! it even has a water mark.
@@ramiel6923 your compliment was sufficient, ramiel.
"it took me 4 years to draw like raphael, and a life time to draw lile a child."
-pablo piccasso
@@Gekumatz Omg so deep
Its not a masterpiece is it? Its misleading to say everything is a masterpiece because Pablo did it, its a drawing. Dont belittle the viewer and Picasso .
So you'd turn up your nose at a plate of scrambled eggs thrown together for you by a master chef ?
Its a lovely work and all the better for having seen it being made. Sad how people can be so cynical in a world with a finite amount of beauty.
@@stevewalker6240 uh. No .. that's not the definition. Masterpiece... a piece made by a master. Or "a work of outstanding artistry, skill, or workmanship"
How much are the eggs ? I once paid $50 for a plate with a little round thing in the middle. It was good. Never again.
@@asahmosskmf4639 its free to look at this painting so in my metaphor the eggs are free as well.
Only those who are building the future, have the right to judge the past. Prejudice of the learned.
I used to make masterpiece like this everyday. When, I was a kid.
MIDAS That’s what is trying to do.
You Should have seen how he painted as a little kid. Pretty on par with a lot of Renaissance era art. He purpously painted this way when he go older. Once you become a master you can break the rules. There's a lot of complex compositional stuff going on even if it does look "childish".
@@paulohara4153 Could you explain to us the composition behind the painting? I'm just asking because I'd like to know more about Picasso and well, it's enough to read the comments to realize that his art is pretty controversial and probably misunderstood.
@@juanthi3745 Yes, definitely misunderstood. Picasso, Miro, Malevich all could paint like Renaissance masters. You can find their early works. What happened is, humanity progressed and photography was invented. So painting like real life was no longer was the hot thing-because photographs could do it better anyway. So they explored the idea of simplicity. You can draw a a chicken like a classical painter but for example for picasso, if you can understand that is a chicken by just lines, why do it otherwise? And dont forget all the other things going around in the world, all the scientific progress, philosophy etc. Painters did not want to paint like 500 years ago. Just as scientists did not want to experiment like 500 years ago. People often forget the era, and think like I can paint like them. Then do it. It doesnt matter now. Nobody will notice. But at that time, it was revolutionary. Art was almost same for 1000 years and it needed a change. Like it or not. And for all people saying I can do that, please do try. 99% of you will not. Because making a drawing/painting abstract requires a solid painting foundation. You cannot simplify a thing unless you know it very well.
When Picasso was kid he used to make realistic drawings...
Art is not about perfect composition it is about exploring anything new. All prominent artists popularized some particular style. Once the worlds eye casts its gaze upon the artist the enigma is manifested.
💩
THANK YOU. Most of these comments have such a conservative view on art and creativity, it's such a shame. It's like they see art as a talent competition, rather than a creative outlet.
It was all fun and games until you realize it was actually The Evolution of Life
0:50 Bacteria
0:56 Plant(algae)
1:00 Fish
1:08 Chicken
1:53 Human
Edit: 3:00 Hell(Death)
U forgot Satan
Fish chicken human death
you think he did that intentionally? that would be cool since it was on tape
if you see this video.....and what if you dont???
Picaso: *Draws chicken with face*
This guy _ITs ThE CirCle Of LiFeEEeEe!_
99% of this comment section and their great sense of humor:
"Painting bad!"
"Picasso."
"Painting good."
stay mad
I guess this is the good 1%?
@@wwa2016 s t f u.
"Muh art".
@MrStrange what's your point by supporting that person
He was never as rich as someone who owns just one of his paintings. And that blows
Welcome to the life of an Artist (a real artist not a musician)
@@nctrnlmjsty798 musicians are real artists tho, i think the word you are searching for is painter
Off all the artists before his time, only he enjoyed a bit of fame and fortune.
@@obeseduck3861 according to google artist is someone who creates art in the form of painting, music , sculpture or writing so technically they are correct
The guy had 1.3 million dollars in gold I think he was alright
To confuse your enemy you must first confuse yourself
Picasso was such a sigma level artist that he prestiged back to noob rank and still owned it.
Of course! And when he would go home, monkeys would fly out of his as$ and bruise his wives
So Charlie is the next picasso?
@@Keepit10011 yes, Charles White is the next Picasso
Show this message to somebody from 1998 and they won't understand a word of it
@@TheHipOneMusic yeah lmfao
Director: You got only 5 minutes
Picasso: Activates Kindergarten mode
good one..got me in tears
😂😂 good one
Picasso invented the word "Trolling"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Rofl
Picasso had to be laughing on the inside. "How people think this crap is art is beyond me"
@keli 20.30 is it so
@keli 20.30 😂😂😂
@keli 20.30 when you think picasso was only cubanism hahah
@keli 20.30 Saying that without mentioning the source is like saying nothing.
@keli 20.30 No he didnt
What I understand is that he was given 5 minutes and told the story of the human race from beginning to end. He started to draw the bacteria, that turned into a fish, then the roots of a tree with the blue sky and the earth that gave legs to the chicken that turned into a human face that became a devil and the end is up to interpretation…
No. Even he didn't know what shit he was drawing. There is no meaning to it.
"I cheated to give you more time."
Picaso inside : I'm doing the same
_Reverse UNO Card_
You might've outsmarted me but I outsmarted your outsmarting
@@nimpsonkinkson1924 you have summoned the jojo fans
What does he meant by cheated?
-- 8 seconds left Pablo...
-- Ok.. forget the chicken, I will do a happy face insteaad
Pedro R lol 😂😂
that is not what he means it
@@syaifulbahary5589 maybe you know what he meant?
@@amishmaknojiya9775 he painted like 5 things in just one painting, the painting itself is shit for sure, but the idea of painting bacteria, then a plant, then fish, then a chicken, then a face, and then what seems to be kind of a demonic face, with people around it, in the same painting, all hidden in the final product, that's pretty cool.
@@kslipknot14 but there are many people who do more than this still they are not famous and hardly earn money .
After five minutes
Picasso: Ok guys it is ready. give me 30 million dollars.
It's amazing that a man with the ability to paint at a 6th grade level is known as one of the greatest artists of all time. Art is fascinating.
Who dont know who Picasso is?
To be honest, Picasso started off as a "normal" type of artist painting the typical portfolio of a typical art student, but to him it wasn't original, to be original he had to push the form beyond Van Gogh, Gauguin, Cezanne, Matisse, Monet etc he had to "move" it forward to next level to be an original, therefore overtime he developed his cubist style which despite what you think is actually extraordinary high in the philosophy and theory of painting as it relates to human nature, interior, design, architecture, psychology, politics, propaganda, etc, his work may seem childish but in fact it is extremely difficult to achieve his work without being a genius operating of a level of higher consciousness with a high mind for the philosophy of painting, Picasso like all "masters" are philosophers first painters second they are just philosopher of painting as opposed to philosophers of language and mind such as Wittgenstein, painting is how they express their philosophical beliefs as opposed to academic papers such as Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, this painting in this video I agree is not his best and I wouldn't consider it however it is a Picasso and due to his other masterpieces and reputation it therefore has value, and to label his style 6th grand is ridiculous you obviously never seen the Guernica if you think such, I suggest researching his work and educating yourself in the metaphysics of painting to really appreciate the work of Picasso.
@@AEZaubermann I was just joking. I went to my local art institute this year and got to see paintings from the 1500 and 1600s. It's amazing that they were capable of that level of ability that long ago.
He had the ABILITY to paint at an expert level of realism. He CHOSE to paint at a 6th grade level of abstract art pieces. There is a difference
There have bin any number of artists, philosophers, and collectors, who have echoed or said this about High-End Art like this, "Art Is Anything You Can Get Away With" Marshall McLuhan.
This was made after WWII, so of course they didn’t hesitate to tell him he was an art master.
@Natalie Wayne its not about painting better or skill, its about the message / what it represents. a lot of people think its lazy or bad but they just dont understand
@Natalie Wayne ok? no one cares about your opinion and no one needs to care about your opinion.
@@seniorvenusdigital3904 someone needs human contact...
@Natalie Wayne modern art more focus on expressing passion than follow a rule of beauty. That's why renaissance painting and modern painting so different, because renaissance painting follow the rule of beauty. Also what makes a painting is valuable isn't just about the paint, but who made the paint. Because, paint just like a history of experience of the painter. That's why if you see Pablo Picasso painting when he was 17th you would know how experience can change painter.
@@evanloud21 you are a little ignorant dont you think?