Why Use an MPLS VPN on Juniper?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @HongeraGideon
    @HongeraGideon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Knox

  • @laurabonillavargas4298
    @laurabonillavargas4298 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! :)

  • @Makingdifference100
    @Makingdifference100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mpls bro. This is an old technology. Super slow. Fiber point to point brother. Why are you still talking about MPLS in 2021? Wow.

    • @williebrown4266
      @williebrown4266 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Said the guy who's obviously never worked in an ISP.

    • @TWX1138
      @TWX1138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@williebrown4266 Mmmhmm. It may be significantly less expensive for the customer to buy into a service provider metro ethernet solution with guaranteed bandwidth, where the service provider's topology allows for multiple customers to share a much higher bandwidth backbone.
      MPLS can also be leveraged intra-org for large organizations, to write essentially flat acces control rules for most subnets of common types of users across sites, with complex rules or rules subject to more frequent change between disparate types of subnets at the central firewall(s) that the VRFs are joined on. Instead of having to push-out rules to a hundred sites I may only have to push rules to two central firewalls or the controller for the firewall array.

    • @anuarsgs1
      @anuarsgs1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      MPLS is still an evolving protocol, but it is supported by the vast majority of routing vendors now a Days a lot of customer still want to use MPLS

    • @jerryjacob75
      @jerryjacob75 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ Davi Santo I hope you meant Metro Ethernet, Fiber point to point AKA "Dark Fiber" does not scale well and is very costly. Just imagine the cost of getting dark fiber between New York to California.

    • @franchise2570
      @franchise2570 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @Makingdifference100 You’re wrong on so many levels.