Economics 101 is Bad for You - James Kwak - Ep. 047

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @davidcox8433
    @davidcox8433 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seemed very political, seemed like his only goal was to get the democrats elected, he seemed to see that as a means in itself.

  • @devin_3875
    @devin_3875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    21:50 - He thinks *our* public schools should begin mishandling education and childcare one year earlier, with Universal Pre-K?
    Unless I’m mistaken, the recent evidence now shows *harms* from this intervention. I recall there was ONE ideally-designed study of the universal pre-k thing which did show benefit for the first few years of followup; but all benefit disappeared by ~grade 6.
    When the Universal pre-K thing was replicated (in Quebec, I think?) - behavioral and impulse-control problems began to show up by ~grade 6.
    I sure hope this gentleman’s personal data is collected by Tech, and then reported to the DOD and Biden’s new Department of Misinformation, for prompt punishment. ;)

  • @SmilaZ
    @SmilaZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ⚠️ The science we run on (is general/mainstream science), is terribly outdated since decades, Not To Mention Too Falsified⚠️

  • @koanbonwa
    @koanbonwa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sooo many things wrong with this guy's perspectives. Seems to have a very appropriate last name. I agree with his own statement that his arguments are sophistry.

  • @Lirvan
    @Lirvan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting take, but I don't agree with Dr. Kwak here. "Ignore the experts and math and push for populism." sounds a lot like the rallying cry of governments five years prior to becoming failed states. Venezuela, for example, was pushing very similar language a decade ago.

  • @keenankendall9105
    @keenankendall9105 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙈 P*R*O*M*O*S*M!!!

  • @ddlyify
    @ddlyify ปีที่แล้ว

    This professor is ridiculously off-base....