If I had a dollar for every time a guest said, “That’s a great question.” ….I love your content along with World Science Festival …fun, interesting & informative!!
@@jaffaxlmeh, his stuff seems to be for more casual space viewers. Kinda regurgitated simple stuff with graphics. But seems like a good kid. History of the Universe puts out masterpieces.
Dr Kater Murch - great guest, great communicator. In terms of promoting an understanding of science, this discussion was exemplary. I absorbed so much. Thank you both!
Time is what gives us value. The only currency in our world is time. Strange that currency’s have been constructed to equal time but you can’t convert them back to time.
Strange how something we don't know much about, time, has an iron grip on modern society. Most workers get paid according to how many hours they work, the main punishment for crimes is a certain amount of time in jail/prison, we assign developmental and other milestones based on how much time (in years) has passed since someone was born, restrict certain things to certain age ranges, the month determines the frequency of our bills, we're generally expected to go to sleep at a certain time of day, wake up at a certain time of day, meals are usually structured to be at certain hours of the day, etc.
@13:06 The same was said regarding home PCs and the television. We don't know what Quantum computers are capable of. It would be impossible to say how useful they may be.
Pulled some boyish laugh nerd charm at 3:47-3:51....that's what's needed to continue your and our exploration into the infinite beyond good sir, never shy from it, I envy your candor, godspeed monsieur Godier!
My theory is- Greater the mass of object ↑ Slower the time ↓ As the mass of sun ,sets the time of earth ,same to moon As in the universe, the greater mass contain object is black hole as we move towards black hole time slower down but we feel fast selfmotion of time So as we go far away from the heavy object ,so as we know we are slow down for some time every object in the universe fast up and we found ourself in the future 2nd As the gravity of the object is negetive or zero object start to fast up and we feel that object are slow down and eventually things become so slow that we see them motionless basically time stop not really time is stopped but we become fast enough to feel Stoped at a point 3rd For getting in the past everything should be (mass) negetive but specially we require speed of light which is not possible to get but i think one day it will come that time travel will be possible
One possible way to time travel, I call it the room temperature fridge. Vibrate a box at the microscopic level to speeds close to the speed of light, whatever is put in the box time is slowed down, preserving hot and cold fridge items. Lovely.
@JohnnyWednesday No, the speed of the vibration phases the box out of our time, slowing the contents down so hot or cold the contents of the "fridge" would be suspended in time.
@EventHorizonShow Thank you, I thought a proof of concept would be vibrating an atomic clock mechanically or with sound to see if there was a measure of time displacement compared to a clock that wasn't.
Time, and Quantum computing... Hmm. I suppose a good question would be if there's a limit to the speed of quantum computing. And if there is, then it would imply that there's a limit to the speed at which the universe 'computes'. If cosmic 'compute' is locally limited, then that could explain "gravity time dilation" as well as "relativistic speed time dilation". i.e. Not effects of either the gravity nor the speed, but simply the locally available 'compute' taking longer to 'refresh' the local information. Since more gravity requires more mass (energy/information), and likewise more speed requires more energy/information (coincidentally increasing the mass off course).
Nice talk on entanglement into the past and closed or open time like curves. Quantum time sniffing. Probability and predictability and quantum foam and gravitational waves and energy density regimes. Though no tippler cylinders and black holes or such. Keep up the good work. Makes me wonder. Memetic waves.
The TV show "Devs" tackled this subject. One haunting scene was a quantum recreation of a hunter-gatherer woman and her dog sitting around a campfire thousands of years ago. It was made clear that due to the fidelity of the sim, this reality was indistinguishable from our past and equally valid as "reality".
"Don't mess with the timeline" is something we hear from time to time. We need to seperate if it possible from if we should. We cannot just decide that altering the timeline is impossible of philosophical reasons. I doubt that it is possible to alter the past but if we could we would not know that a change has taken place. We are part of this universe. If we alter the universe we alter ourselves with it.
The most significant issue is the potential for causality violations. One possible solution to this paradox is to invoke the "many-worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics. In this view, every quantum event results in the branching of the universe into multiple parallel worlds, each representing a different outcome. If quantum entanglement allows retroactive adjustments to past actions, it could simply create a new branch in the multiverse where the experimentalist's adjustments are consistent with the new timeline. The original timeline, where the past remained unchanged, would continue to exist in parallel, avoiding any contradictions.
Nikolai was interested in the quantum even if he didnt much engage with it as a singular study he did build macro induction of quantum phenomena aka the x ray how much information is present at the grandscale that relies on the attosecond to go backwards in time you need to beable to inflate the information within that space allowing it to repeat as a function so collapse doesnt scrub the function changing its transitive figure
@@BigTimeRushFan2112lame comment bro.... U must have issues, not to mention know everything about temporal causality loops.....tell me how many masters do you have in physics and Mathematics? None I'll wager..... You may think I have a very very very small miind but it's large enough to assume nothing..... Zero supremous 😂😂😂
"The universe seems to be able to break it's rules. We cant." -JMG (likely not verbatim) With the above and the way light isn't a wave or particle till measured, plus much other quantum seems to support the universe as some sort of....computer.. or program...or machine...or something artifical.
If you were to reverse the direction of time, it would be like slowing it down until it stops, then moving in what (from our perspective) would be a negative direction. But to reach a negative direction, we would need to get there without time ceasing to exist, and you can't do that. It’s like encountering the real-world analogy of division by zero. If you stop time, you lose access to this vector or dimension. Time must be 'created' in a single direction. However, you might be able to circumvent this by using more than one arrow of time simultaneously, but I’ve never speculated on how or if that could work. I understand the consequences of trying to increase our number of spatial dimensions from three to four and how my cognitive limitations would prevent me from fully imagining this. The tesseract often used to represent a four-dimensional object is merely its shadow projected onto a two-dimensional surface in a three-dimensional space. If introducing more than one time dimension has similar consequences, I don't know what to expect. I think you need access to a higher dimension to fold a dimension back over itself, and to reverse the direction of time, you might need an additional arrow of time to achieve a higher time dimension. This would allow us to fold our direction without time ceasing to exist, as it would if it came to a stop. Stopping time would be like reducing the spatial dimension of a one-dimensional space to zero, leaving you with nothingness and no vector to add or subtract length from. It would be interesting if we learned how to manipulate spatial dimensions past their zero point, allowing us to achieve the equivalent of a reverse arrow of time. This might let us build an object like the TARDIS from the TV series Doctor Who, which is bigger on the inside.
Just think about it as if time being the expansion rate of the three dimensions of space. Gravity slows the expansion locally and that explains why time is relative. Because space is expanding and not contracting, we see the apparent one directional arrow of time. The expansion itself might be the source of entropy.
maybe the observer imposes a perception of causality but cannot see or perceive a time line that is not in agreement with causality, that is we cannot imagine it, so we assume it is a prerequisite .. but if we did, we would call it a paradox.. it is not ruled out, it is simply not allowed in our philosophy.. our assumptions.. if you could not perceive more than 3 dimensions, why would you try to make a 4 dimensional hammer?
So annoying that everyone believes Einstein’s “Spooky action at a distance” referred to entanglement. It did NOT, he referred to the collapse of the wave function happening at an instance everywhere along the wave function violating special relativity’s concept of simultaneity. This faulty attribution is so common. And Einstein was right about that one, quantum mechanics biggest flaw is that it lack a description of what measurement really is.
While you can't send a message using an entangled particle itself due to the randomness, how about answering true/false question agreed upon in advance via manipulation of the ratio of particles of one spin vs. another? For instance let's say we have a pair of containers that hold a series of halves of pairs of entangled particles. The moment you set a majority of your particles to up spin, you stop manipulating them. You just collapse particles until you reach the desired ratio. We agree ahead of time that if I see more down than up in my box, I interpret that as true and vice versa for majority up. Now we have a series of boxes. They're all technically single use, but you've agreed to collapse particles in each box in a pre-determined order one say every few seconds to indicate your engines are running smoothly in your mission to another galaxy. You now have a way no matter what distance you're at to send me instant telemetry. Now what's to stop a similar system from creating a series of true/false systems over time that act as bits in a binary sequence? The information density would depend on how many containers per second we have space for, but it suddenly allows for transmission of information across vast distances.
This is a wish list of what quantum computers can do. None of these things have been achieved yet, but they feel progress is being made. I have real doubts about the wish list but secretly hope I'm wrong.
🤷♂️A state change is information. This is analogous to using the rising and falling edge of a squarewave to communicate data, which happens all the time in digital electronics. If only the state change is usable, as opposed to (for example) signal polarization, a signal could be derived based on, say, phase modulation keyed to a local clock signal. A known digital key could be used as parity. A "bootstrap" uniform signal could be used to first coordinate the two local clock oscillators. In this scenario, disruption through detection would be irrelevant, because only the occurrence of a state change is needed, not specific information about the quantum state of the particles. I'm certain government must be quietly far ahead of the private sector in these areas.
This is what Sabine Hossenfelder has been criticizing about modern physics. They build models where the math is "beautiful" or "elegant", and then make the mistake that it applies to reality in some way and make sweeping claims about the nature of reality, while ignoring that they picked the parameters of their simulations to match their maths in the first place.
Does gravity regulate time thru space ? Is time like a river flowing over a foundation of space slowed by boulders in the stream slowing it in parts of the river ?
Why not use morse code through the entangled particles as a way to send information? Or, better even, binary? Would be a great way to be able to remotely control/reprogram and get information from probes/explorer robots we'll send out there. Like the ones on mars but now we send them with one half of a pair of entangled particles connecting them to us for that purpose of communication. Asking for a friend...
Technically, you could put it back together, but the likelihood of it happening on its own are very very very small. That's why disorder, i.e. entropy, increases.
Is time a fundamental property of the universe, or an emergent entity, for a lack of a better word? It seems to me that movement is a fundamental property/aspect of the universe.. everything moves. Mass, energy, space and the entire observable universe. Perhaps without movement time would not exist, right? Time simply cannot exist in a frozen universe, correct? So time must be an emergent property via cause and effect.. in other words, time exists because everything, including the entire observable universe, moves... right? Thus, time travel into the past must be impossible.. right?
It's mostly to data mine the masses I wouldn't want a "super computer" controlled by corporate overlords riddled with subscriptions and lack of privacy. Don't get me started with arbitration clauses...
I think my comment got deleted. It was a bit long. Here is a short version. If backwards time travel creates a new timeline then the current timeline will never know it happened. Uap’s could be future humans coming back to alter the timeline. But they are also creating new timelines. And that explains the different types of aliens/crafts.
Sounds like a lonely existence. Once relativistic speeds and alternate timelines are in play, then all links to home are lost. Not seeing how a sociery would be cohesive, function, or get feedback. Sci-fi broke our brains in this respect.
@@sagittariusa2008 There could’ve been problems in the future where humans came back to try and fix things. And maybe it ended up being like a movie much more difficult than imagined. Since the timeline splits. Maybe new future timelines reach a point where they figure out backwards time travel is possible and they realize uap’s in the history books were actually time travellers so they use that knowledge before going back. Just a wild speculation. I explained a few other things in my first comment that got deleted but I dont feel like typing that out again lol.
Everyone gives the exact same answer for spooky action at a distance like word for word but nobody ever explains how we know what happens lightyears away and that point is parroted constantly I’m not disputing it but why is the process of coming to believe this never talked about. Pretty sure I’ve said this before but if scientist are going to tell people something effects something else light years away plz tell me what process of understanding led to this conclusion and plz don’t tell me y’all have just been saying so cause Einstein said so there not point in science unless also there is understanding sometimes it feels like most scientists don’t understand it so they give you a standard textbook response. I’m still in camp if an electron can signal faster that the speed of light than that electron can also teach us how to do this because simply saying that would be too hard is well way to easy . I guess if you get paid regardless what’s the point
There is actually no "instrument" that can measure time, we have always used something that beats out a rhythm ie a pendulum, or a vibrating piece of material, but a real time piece would be something you could hold in your hand and measure the expansion of the universe and the gravity around you and your motion within the universe?!!!
I don't know much about quantum physics, but I do know that messages from the future are possible : they are called premonitions, typically delivered via vivid and memorable dreams. I've had a few in this lifetime, usually predicting a very traumatic event such as the sudden and unexpected passing of a loved one in hours or days to come. Many other people have them too. So yes, the universe sending us a message from the future is definitely possible. The only question is how.
In this lifetime? Interesting. I suspect you've been misled by the woo-wooers. QM has nothing to do with your conjecture. Then there's confirmation bias. The cause of the majority of the misconceptions about the human condition. Our brains ignore the 100 times we were wrong but focus intensity on the one time we're coincidentally right. Oh, and if one relates their story with confidence and passion, others tend to take it as gospel...
@@the_anomaly_channel Time travel is possible with the use of bark of the root of the iboga tree, creating ibogaine. It is the most amazing experience of my life, to know categorically that time travel is possible. Welcome to the Ibogaine rabbit hole. It's nickname is ' I Begin Again ' for a good reason.
The professor is caught up in his math too much to explain to us, what exactly does it mean to move backwards to the arrow of time? If that even means anything? Like what? Reversing play on a video? Retrocausality? This makes no sense in reality. The universe does not work in this way, and if so, maybe he could point us where exactly this happens. And it's funny how he thinks that only the arrow of time points forward. What about a spatial dimension? Isn't any movement in space a forward movement? If you wanna give directional arrows to spatial dimensions, aren't those arrows always pointing forward? So how is space different? And if for the professor, moving backwards to the arrow of time holds some meaning, then maybe he could explain what does it mean to move backwards to the arrow of a spatial dimension, to move in negative space? In a space where every movement is a movement pointing backwards to the spatial arrow? What does this even mean? And really, give us a break professor with your quantum computers. What TF even is a quantum computer? Define it. A computer bit in computing is really a mechanism, based on logic. Now you have something, now you don't. Just because it is done using electricity, it does not matter, it's efficient that way. It could be done with anything. What TF is a qubit? Is this still a mechanism based on logic or are you referring to magically harness inherent properties of your constructed model of nature? If it's the later, which it is, this is never gonna happen. The reason professor is that there is no such thing as quanta in reality. They're imaginary. Like particles. It's a model. You can take advantage of a model to build something out of nature's properties, but you cannot use the model itself for anything useful. I could build something using electricity, to turn on and off a switch, a bit, but I cannot use electrons themselves as particles, cause they do not exist. A model, is imaginary, it's a construct you make to help you better understand or work with things you cannot see, identify, quantify, or whatever else. It's not to be taken literally. So if you intend to use some natural property, that's fine, but if you intend to use any entity of your model, that can't happen. You cannot store or manipulate information on quanta themselves cause they do not exist. Just like electrons. They're made up. If this is what you intend to do with quantum computers, that's never gonna happen. So yeah, quantum computers will get you to travel in time. Something imaginary that can never be build, will allow you to do things that can never be done. False => False. At least your logic is sound for a classical computer professor.
is there really a difference between space and time.... it may seem like you can go back in space but not time but the earth and sun and galaxy and entire universe are moving at incredible speed, when i go 10 metres one way and 10 metres back i have actually moved thousands of kilometres in spacetime. i'm not back to where i was...kind of? everyone knows that's how superman reversed time, explain that huh :P
Yes, and you just described why. But what would one mean without the other may be a more interesting question. Not sure what marijhuana has to do with this...
Time: We stream Consciousness from God. That streaming is what WE perceive as the passing of Time. The Double Slit Experiment proves that Creation is NOW... so Time is not a mystery... unless you want it to be:) There is no Time in the quantum, exactly... there is no Time in the Conscious Field, because Creation is Consciousness interacting with the Gravity Wave. THAT is what creates reality as we know it.
I've heard this idea before worded differently. The idea that the brain is a form of antennae that picks up a stream of consciousness that exists as another dimension. Interesting stuff.
how does it feel to have the greatest podcast in the world?? Spotify/ SiriusXM should be paying Event Horizon with Joe Rogan type money
Happily give you all of Joe's money
Agreed, but not until @JohnMichaelGodier finishes his next book!
You being silly.
@@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992 it's the only podcast I listen to.. this content is way better than any pop-culture "entertainment" stuff
@@J31 lol
If I had a dollar for every time a guest said, “That’s a great question.” ….I love your content along with World Science Festival …fun, interesting & informative!!
You rock!
@@EventHorizonShow Definitely.
I have been watching this channel for about 3 years now and its one of my favorite channels along with Issac Arther and pbs Spacetime.
Please don't forget SEA
@@jaffaxlmeh, his stuff seems to be for more casual space viewers. Kinda regurgitated simple stuff with graphics. But seems like a good kid.
History of the Universe puts out masterpieces.
I love Isaac Arthur ❤
Space time with Mr Bean?
@@michaelscott466 Matt
Dr Kater Murch - great guest, great communicator. In terms of promoting an understanding of science, this discussion was exemplary. I absorbed so much. Thank you both!
@@MichaelDembinski however, spoilt by neuseating, droning music in background!!
Love this show so much, I always look forward to Thursday's and have done for years since event horizon started have a wonderful weekend everyone ❤️
Glad you enjoy it!
Time is what gives us value. The only currency in our world is time. Strange that currency’s have been constructed to equal time but you can’t convert them back to time.
Strange how something we don't know much about, time, has an iron grip on modern society. Most workers get paid according to how many hours they work, the main punishment for crimes is a certain amount of time in jail/prison, we assign developmental and other milestones based on how much time (in years) has passed since someone was born, restrict certain things to certain age ranges, the month determines the frequency of our bills, we're generally expected to go to sleep at a certain time of day, wake up at a certain time of day, meals are usually structured to be at certain hours of the day, etc.
@stormtrooper3381 the amount of work achieved per dollar spent goes up so no equivalent exchange
How many other Douglas Adams fans heard "time is an illusion" and automatically thought "lunchtime, doubly so"?
Caused by a lack of alcohol?
I automatically thought "lunchtime, doubly so" BEFORE I heard "time is an illusion"
Yikes
I missed that but the qoute sound very much like something Douglas Adams would say.
Time is relative.
@13:06 The same was said regarding home PCs and the television. We don't know what Quantum computers are capable of. It would be impossible to say how useful they may be.
Who knows what quantum computers could eventually do.
I always learn something amazing from your broadcasts and you also manage to mellow me out. Thanks!
Awesome, thank you!
Pulled some boyish laugh nerd charm at 3:47-3:51....that's what's needed to continue your and our exploration into the infinite beyond good sir, never shy from it, I envy your candor, godspeed monsieur Godier!
THANKS for still reading your comments.
Always!
@@EventHorizonShow But how doe we know it's actually YOU? Tell us something only we would know!
@@LoxleyMusic Boo! But that's actually Rossy my producer commenting as EH. But you bet I personally read all the comments as well.
@@JohnMichaelGodier All the best to you, Rossy and your loved ones. I love your channels. Have a great day :)
My theory is-
Greater the mass of object ↑
Slower the time ↓
As the mass of sun ,sets the time of earth ,same to moon
As in the universe, the greater mass contain object is black hole as we move towards black hole time slower down but we feel fast selfmotion of time
So as we go far away from the heavy object ,so as we know we are slow down for some time every object in the universe fast up and we found ourself in the future
2nd
As the gravity of the object is negetive or zero object start to fast up and we feel that object are slow down and eventually things become so slow that we see them motionless basically time stop not really time is stopped but we become fast enough to feel Stoped at a point
3rd
For getting in the past everything should be (mass) negetive but specially we require speed of light which is not possible to get but i think one day it will come that time travel will be possible
I hate you John because there is no other podcast I can fall asleep to besides yours. Always looking forward to new episodes! :)
One possible way to time travel, I call it the room temperature fridge. Vibrate a box at the microscopic level to speeds close to the speed of light, whatever is put in the box time is slowed down, preserving hot and cold fridge items. Lovely.
So you're saying that the hotter something is, the faster it vibrates and the slower time moves for it?
@JohnnyWednesday No, the speed of the vibration phases the box out of our time, slowing the contents down so hot or cold the contents of the "fridge" would be suspended in time.
Cool idea
@EventHorizonShow Thank you, I thought a proof of concept would be vibrating an atomic clock mechanically or with sound to see if there was a measure of time displacement compared to a clock that wasn't.
@@EventHorizonShowHa ha!
Time, and Quantum computing... Hmm. I suppose a good question would be if there's a limit to the speed of quantum computing. And if there is, then it would imply that there's a limit to the speed at which the universe 'computes'. If cosmic 'compute' is locally limited, then that could explain "gravity time dilation" as well as "relativistic speed time dilation". i.e. Not effects of either the gravity nor the speed, but simply the locally available 'compute' taking longer to 'refresh' the local information. Since more gravity requires more mass (energy/information), and likewise more speed requires more energy/information (coincidentally increasing the mass off course).
Can’t wait to listen to this
And yet ...
Awesomeness ❤
🙌
I love your work. Mind bending and insightful
Title goes crazy
Nice talk on entanglement into the past and closed or open time like curves. Quantum time sniffing. Probability and predictability and quantum foam and gravitational waves and energy density regimes. Though no tippler cylinders and black holes or such.
Keep up the good work. Makes me wonder. Memetic waves.
The TV show "Devs" tackled this subject. One haunting scene was a quantum recreation of a hunter-gatherer woman and her dog sitting around a campfire thousands of years ago. It was made clear that due to the fidelity of the sim, this reality was indistinguishable from our past and equally valid as "reality".
Where does this air or stream?
@@grindcoreninja6527it's on Hulu. It's really good
"Don't mess with the timeline" is something we hear from time to time. We need to seperate if it possible from if we should. We cannot just decide that altering the timeline is impossible of philosophical reasons. I doubt that it is possible to alter the past but if we could we would not know that a change has taken place. We are part of this universe. If we alter the universe we alter ourselves with it.
If time is just an illusion then it is a very persistent illusion.
The most significant issue is the potential for causality violations. One possible solution to this paradox is to invoke the "many-worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics. In this view, every quantum event results in the branching of the universe into multiple parallel worlds, each representing a different outcome. If quantum entanglement allows retroactive adjustments to past actions, it could simply create a new branch in the multiverse where the experimentalist's adjustments are consistent with the new timeline. The original timeline, where the past remained unchanged, would continue to exist in parallel, avoiding any contradictions.
Awsome topic 🎉
yes
Nikolai was interested in the quantum even if he didnt much engage with it as a singular study he did build macro induction of quantum phenomena aka the x ray how much information is present at the grandscale that relies on the attosecond to go backwards in time you need to beable to inflate the information within that space allowing it to repeat as a function so collapse doesnt scrub the function changing its transitive figure
Wonderful you are the best.
You are!
Great video and information !
Mind blown
😮💣 🌬️
@@BigTimeRushFan2112 you can tell all that from 1 comment..... Wow! You must be a genius 😂
@@BigTimeRushFan2112lame comment bro.... U must have issues, not to mention know everything about temporal causality loops.....tell me how many masters do you have in physics and Mathematics? None I'll wager..... You may think I have a very very very small miind but it's large enough to assume nothing..... Zero supremous 😂😂😂
Great show. This is similar to what Sheldrake discusses.
"The universe seems to be able to break it's rules. We cant."
-JMG (likely not verbatim)
With the above and the way light isn't a wave or particle till measured, plus much other quantum seems to support the universe as some sort of....computer.. or program...or machine...or something artifical.
*grabs popcorn, snacks*
If you were to reverse the direction of time, it would be like slowing it down until it stops, then moving in what (from our perspective) would be a negative direction. But to reach a negative direction, we would need to get there without time ceasing to exist, and you can't do that. It’s like encountering the real-world analogy of division by zero. If you stop time, you lose access to this vector or dimension. Time must be 'created' in a single direction.
However, you might be able to circumvent this by using more than one arrow of time simultaneously, but I’ve never speculated on how or if that could work.
I understand the consequences of trying to increase our number of spatial dimensions from three to four and how my cognitive limitations would prevent me from fully imagining this. The tesseract often used to represent a four-dimensional object is merely its shadow projected onto a two-dimensional surface in a three-dimensional space.
If introducing more than one time dimension has similar consequences, I don't know what to expect.
I think you need access to a higher dimension to fold a dimension back over itself, and to reverse the direction of time, you might need an additional arrow of time to achieve a higher time dimension. This would allow us to fold our direction without time ceasing to exist, as it would if it came to a stop.
Stopping time would be like reducing the spatial dimension of a one-dimensional space to zero, leaving you with nothingness and no vector to add or subtract length from.
It would be interesting if we learned how to manipulate spatial dimensions past their zero point, allowing us to achieve the equivalent of a reverse arrow of time. This might let us build an object like the TARDIS from the TV series Doctor Who, which is bigger on the inside.
Just think about it as if time being the expansion rate of the three dimensions of space. Gravity slows the expansion locally and that explains why time is relative. Because space is expanding and not contracting, we see the apparent one directional arrow of time. The expansion itself might be the source of entropy.
Your Welcome
You should interview GZA aka the Genius from Wu Tang Clan…he’s big into science and Astronomy 🎵🎵🌠🌠
You think he’d come on the show?
@@EventHorizonShow I think so 👍👍
Well, that’d be cool.
@@EventHorizonShow agree
Why is it, I feel more nourished from information listening to channels like EH.
Humbling and compelling listening to minds on a higher plane of thought.
maybe the observer imposes a perception of causality but cannot see or perceive a time line that is not in agreement with causality, that is we cannot imagine it, so we assume it is a prerequisite .. but if we did, we would call it a paradox.. it is not ruled out, it is simply not allowed in our philosophy.. our assumptions.. if you could not perceive more than 3 dimensions, why would you try to make a 4 dimensional hammer?
the Time traveling Travelers
are you still posting your episodes to podcast? last ones i see on your podcast in spotify are from March.
So annoying that everyone believes Einstein’s “Spooky action at a distance” referred to entanglement. It did NOT, he referred to the collapse of the wave function happening at an instance everywhere along the wave function violating special relativity’s concept of simultaneity. This faulty attribution is so common. And Einstein was right about that one, quantum mechanics biggest flaw is that it lack a description of what measurement really is.
This seems like a better option then the Black God ritual. Maybe gonna hold off trying that until I see how this goes.
ahhh. time to chill with the cap'n.
Curious if you can’t make large quantum computer can you not make a large distributive network for small networks?
oh, that could explain life. order from a lower order state.
While you can't send a message using an entangled particle itself due to the randomness, how about answering true/false question agreed upon in advance via manipulation of the ratio of particles of one spin vs. another? For instance let's say we have a pair of containers that hold a series of halves of pairs of entangled particles. The moment you set a majority of your particles to up spin, you stop manipulating them. You just collapse particles until you reach the desired ratio. We agree ahead of time that if I see more down than up in my box, I interpret that as true and vice versa for majority up.
Now we have a series of boxes. They're all technically single use, but you've agreed to collapse particles in each box in a pre-determined order one say every few seconds to indicate your engines are running smoothly in your mission to another galaxy. You now have a way no matter what distance you're at to send me instant telemetry. Now what's to stop a similar system from creating a series of true/false systems over time that act as bits in a binary sequence? The information density would depend on how many containers per second we have space for, but it suddenly allows for transmission of information across vast distances.
Quantum Sensors in the DMT realms state of minds
This is a wish list of what quantum computers can do. None of these things have been achieved yet, but they feel progress is being made. I have real doubts about the wish list but secretly hope I'm wrong.
🤷♂️A state change is information. This is analogous to using the rising and falling edge of a squarewave to communicate data, which happens all the time in digital electronics. If only the state change is usable, as opposed to (for example) signal polarization, a signal could be derived based on, say, phase modulation keyed to a local clock signal. A known digital key could be used as parity. A "bootstrap" uniform signal could be used to first coordinate the two local clock oscillators. In this scenario, disruption through detection would be irrelevant, because only the occurrence of a state change is needed, not specific information about the quantum state of the particles. I'm certain government must be quietly far ahead of the private sector in these areas.
Whoop! TH-cam was only offering scams and click-bait... Thank you so much ❤❤❤
Woah
Finally there's a new one.
Exactly!
Is this Kurt Loader speaking? John Michael Goddea
Amazing how we entangle ourselves in our own math and assume it must be right because math
Math wasn't created. It was discovered.
Math was both discovered and created.
This is what Sabine Hossenfelder has been criticizing about modern physics. They build models where the math is "beautiful" or "elegant", and then make the mistake that it applies to reality in some way and make sweeping claims about the nature of reality, while ignoring that they picked the parameters of their simulations to match their maths in the first place.
Does gravity regulate time thru space ? Is time like a river flowing over a foundation of space slowed by boulders in the stream slowing it in parts of the river ?
" play it backwards "
Oh my god look TIME TRAVEL
Hmmm how would one deal with the paradoxes though?
Could we say that the apple lying on the ground now must have caused the apple tree to have been planted some years before?
What if we send multiple entangled particles and use single pairs as dots and double pairs as dashes?
Back to the future,again
Why not use morse code through the entangled particles as a way to send information? Or, better even, binary? Would be a great way to be able to remotely control/reprogram and get information from probes/explorer robots we'll send out there. Like the ones on mars but now we send them with one half of a pair of entangled particles connecting them to us for that purpose of communication.
Asking for a friend...
IF “time” is just a human construct, then time travel should be impossible because there would be no actual, physical time dimension to travel within.
6 min or so in that background sound killed all the dialogue for me. Very distracting yet a lot of podcasts do it
fact that you can break an egg but not build it back. except the fact that it's there built in the first place.
Technically, you could put it back together, but the likelihood of it happening on its own are very very very small. That's why disorder, i.e. entropy, increases.
@@macbuff81 but how did things go from disordered to ordered to ordering? anyway just talking off the cuff. armchair philosophy lol.
On average, entropy increases. Can still get pockets of order. i.e. Life
Arrow of time direction = energy driven expansion vector(s) caused by the big bang.?
Is time a fundamental property of the universe, or an emergent entity, for a lack of a better word? It seems to me that movement is a fundamental property/aspect of the universe.. everything moves. Mass, energy, space and the entire observable universe. Perhaps without movement time would not exist, right? Time simply cannot exist in a frozen universe, correct?
So time must be an emergent property via cause and effect.. in other words, time exists because everything, including the entire observable universe, moves... right?
Thus, time travel into the past must be impossible.. right?
I agree. Same with consciousness.
The two are inextricably linked.
It's mostly to data mine the masses I wouldn't want a "super computer" controlled by corporate overlords riddled with subscriptions and lack of privacy. Don't get me started with arbitration clauses...
I think my comment got deleted. It was a bit long. Here is a short version.
If backwards time travel creates a new timeline then the current timeline will never know it happened.
Uap’s could be future humans coming back to alter the timeline. But they are also creating new timelines. And that explains the different types of aliens/crafts.
Sounds like a lonely existence.
Once relativistic speeds and alternate timelines are in play, then all links to home are lost.
Not seeing how a sociery would be cohesive, function, or get feedback.
Sci-fi broke our brains in this respect.
@@sagittariusa2008 There could’ve been problems in the future where humans came back to try and fix things. And maybe it ended up being like a movie much more difficult than imagined.
Since the timeline splits. Maybe new future timelines reach a point where they figure out backwards time travel is possible and they realize uap’s in the history books were actually time travellers so they use that knowledge before going back.
Just a wild speculation. I explained a few other things in my first comment that got deleted but I dont feel like typing that out again lol.
No.
Given that matter cannot be created or destroyed that the insuinuation of dark matter is a hint that time travel to the past has and is happening?
Is dark matter just gravity without particles?
13:06 video games...??
Everyone gives the exact same answer for spooky action at a distance like word for word but nobody ever explains how we know what happens lightyears away and that point is parroted constantly I’m not disputing it but why is the process of coming to believe this never talked about. Pretty sure I’ve said this before but if scientist are going to tell people something effects something else light years away plz tell me what process of understanding led to this conclusion and plz don’t tell me y’all have just been saying so cause Einstein said so there not point in science unless also there is understanding sometimes it feels like most scientists don’t understand it so they give you a standard textbook response. I’m still in camp if an electron can signal faster that the speed of light than that electron can also teach us how to do this because simply saying that would be too hard is well way to easy . I guess if you get paid regardless what’s the point
Perfect comment. I agree
There is actually no "instrument" that can measure time, we have always used something that beats out a rhythm ie a pendulum, or a vibrating piece of material, but a real time piece would be something you could hold in your hand and measure the expansion of the universe and the gravity around you and your motion within the universe?!!!
I don't know much about quantum physics, but I do know that messages from the future are possible : they are called premonitions, typically delivered via vivid and memorable dreams. I've had a few in this lifetime, usually predicting a very traumatic event such as the sudden and unexpected passing of a loved one in hours or days to come. Many other people have them too. So yes, the universe sending us a message from the future is definitely possible. The only question is how.
In this lifetime? Interesting.
I suspect you've been misled by the woo-wooers. QM has nothing to do with your conjecture.
Then there's confirmation bias. The cause of the majority of the misconceptions about the human condition.
Our brains ignore the 100 times we were wrong but focus intensity on the one time we're coincidentally right.
Oh, and if one relates their story with confidence and passion, others tend to take it as gospel...
Time is different because it is a man made construction entropy is time 😂
Oh god people, let me help.
Can you go back in space?
Does choice = entropy?
Sometimes. Other times, it equals order.
You need to take biologicals out of your calculation.
Most of the 'verse is inanimate.
Iboga/ibogaine = Time travel.
@@dreamlodge ??
@@the_anomaly_channel Time travel is possible with the use of bark of the root of the iboga tree, creating ibogaine. It is the most amazing experience of my life, to know categorically that time travel is possible.
Welcome to the Ibogaine rabbit hole.
It's nickname is ' I Begin Again ' for a good reason.
The professor is caught up in his math too much to explain to us, what exactly does it mean to move backwards to the arrow of time? If that even means anything? Like what? Reversing play on a video? Retrocausality? This makes no sense in reality. The universe does not work in this way, and if so, maybe he could point us where exactly this happens. And it's funny how he thinks that only the arrow of time points forward. What about a spatial dimension? Isn't any movement in space a forward movement? If you wanna give directional arrows to spatial dimensions, aren't those arrows always pointing forward? So how is space different? And if for the professor, moving backwards to the arrow of time holds some meaning, then maybe he could explain what does it mean to move backwards to the arrow of a spatial dimension, to move in negative space? In a space where every movement is a movement pointing backwards to the spatial arrow? What does this even mean?
And really, give us a break professor with your quantum computers. What TF even is a quantum computer? Define it. A computer bit in computing is really a mechanism, based on logic. Now you have something, now you don't. Just because it is done using electricity, it does not matter, it's efficient that way. It could be done with anything. What TF is a qubit? Is this still a mechanism based on logic or are you referring to magically harness inherent properties of your constructed model of nature? If it's the later, which it is, this is never gonna happen. The reason professor is that there is no such thing as quanta in reality. They're imaginary. Like particles. It's a model. You can take advantage of a model to build something out of nature's properties, but you cannot use the model itself for anything useful. I could build something using electricity, to turn on and off a switch, a bit, but I cannot use electrons themselves as particles, cause they do not exist. A model, is imaginary, it's a construct you make to help you better understand or work with things you cannot see, identify, quantify, or whatever else. It's not to be taken literally. So if you intend to use some natural property, that's fine, but if you intend to use any entity of your model, that can't happen. You cannot store or manipulate information on quanta themselves cause they do not exist. Just like electrons. They're made up. If this is what you intend to do with quantum computers, that's never gonna happen.
So yeah, quantum computers will get you to travel in time. Something imaginary that can never be build, will allow you to do things that can never be done. False => False. At least your logic is sound for a classical computer professor.
is there really a difference between space and time.... it may seem like you can go back in space but not time but the earth and sun and galaxy and entire universe are moving at incredible speed, when i go 10 metres one way and 10 metres back i have actually moved thousands of kilometres in spacetime. i'm not back to where i was...kind of? everyone knows that's how superman reversed time, explain that huh :P
Lay off the marijuanas son.
STAY ON them marijuanas!!
Yes, and you just described why.
But what would one mean without the other may be a more interesting question.
Not sure what marijhuana has to do with this...
You can't send complexity
Two words: Ayahuasca.
There are three types of people.
Those that are good at math, and those that are not...
@@sagittariusa2008 Welcome kindred spirit.
Time: We stream Consciousness from God. That streaming is what WE perceive as the passing of Time. The Double Slit Experiment proves that Creation is NOW... so Time is not a mystery... unless you want it to be:) There is no Time in the quantum, exactly... there is no Time in the Conscious Field, because Creation is Consciousness interacting with the Gravity Wave. THAT is what creates reality as we know it.
Oh dear.
@@AndrewBlucher I've penned better explanations:)
I've heard this idea before worded differently. The idea that the brain is a form of antennae that picks up a stream of consciousness that exists as another dimension. Interesting stuff.
@@batmandeltaforce God? I'm a science guy. Show me evidence.
@@AndrewBlucher You're are familiar with the Double Slit Experiment. There is your proof.
dude the slow pan out of a paragragh is annoying when you cant finish the sentence reading, cool pod though, loves ya
Hahahaha fiction
fiction for humanity
turn off the music
Turn the, off putting, irritating, annoying background noise OFF! It drives people MAD!
No problem here .
OMG THANK YOU! YESSSSS...
You can please some of the people some of the time ...
Same. It adds. A lot of people listen to JMG after the initial listen to sleep. I certainly do.
I like it, speak for yourself :)