Mod-01 Lec-02 Basic Quantum Mechanics II: The Schrodinger Equation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 95

  • @souvikbhatta2224
    @souvikbhatta2224 8 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    im a below avg student
    and this was suprisingly easy to understand for me
    thank you professor
    pronam neben

  • @pavelsaha2730
    @pavelsaha2730 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    For this man I passed in my physics exam. Thanks a lot sir. Without this man I'd fail

  • @sishir_jana
    @sishir_jana 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Sir ,I read the optics book written by you is very good book to understand physics properly.Thanking you sir

    • @norasellaoui1822
      @norasellaoui1822 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please the title of book and name of author in English of course?

  • @mcchickencrispy
    @mcchickencrispy 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you very much for this video sir :-) ..means a lot to a students who struggle with this topic ..Thanks once again ..!!

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 ปีที่แล้ว

    God of physics to India is prof.Ajoy Ghatak.

  • @kewalanand6197
    @kewalanand6197 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank u sir....u r a former professor of IIT Delhi.......I m a student of the same institution........I well understood.. the Dirac delta function..

  • @rgbulusu
    @rgbulusu 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excellent methodology of teaching. Really outstanding. So lucid.

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    To your Industrious effort we understand well I fall at your feet.

  • @hudamh7479
    @hudamh7479 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best lecturer in lecturing quantum mechanics

  • @ScalarSeeker
    @ScalarSeeker หลายเดือนก่อน

    An excellent lecture on Dirac Delta function in my opinion

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    None can teach better than this quantum mechanics. ஆ ஆ ஆ ஆ.

  • @Chandrasanjeevakharvi
    @Chandrasanjeevakharvi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I proudly feel, i understood some thing... Thats why we need a master ..

  • @utkarshpande11
    @utkarshpande11 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks sir for the video..nice brush-up of the concepts.

  • @powerentertainment719
    @powerentertainment719 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good professor. HE explained everything well.

  • @SimeonHanks
    @SimeonHanks 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    To anyone watching these videos, it would be of great importance for you to know of a new feature within TH-cam. You can volunteer on the bottom of the screen to "Try something new" and enable HTML5 viewing. This allows you to play these lectures at 1.5x or 2.0x speed, effectively doubling your studying time efficiency.

    • @UditDey
      @UditDey 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you are so outdated

    • @jdragon8184
      @jdragon8184 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol noob x1.75 is much better

    • @jdragon8184
      @jdragon8184 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      though 6 year ago this cmnt was imp

  • @hasanakin8078
    @hasanakin8078 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks Professor for this nice video

  • @masoomladka8017
    @masoomladka8017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    14:50 can anyone send rigorous derivation of shrodinger eqn

    • @aryanshah17
      @aryanshah17 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Long time no see bruh lol

    • @masoomladka8017
      @masoomladka8017 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aryanshah17 tum telegram id delete kardiye how can i contact u?

    • @masoomladka8017
      @masoomladka8017 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aryanshah17 tele pe aana to msg karna warna koi dusra social media account do

    • @kiit8337
      @kiit8337 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@masoomladka8017 aree masoom bhai 🥺🙂🙂🙂

  • @pradyumnakatageri3475
    @pradyumnakatageri3475 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nearly a century later, Schrodinger's cat is how most of us remember Schrodinger's work. His work must be much more praised !!

  • @alexandersani7203
    @alexandersani7203 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These proff is too good

  • @Quantum_study
    @Quantum_study 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your books on optics is great

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent.How do you remember all these things in mind?we can not appreciate you but we can prostrate before you sir.

  • @akashadsul7363
    @akashadsul7363 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice lecture sir really helful..btw i love ur optics book

  • @joychakraborty3281
    @joychakraborty3281 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    55:47 why the dirac delta function added to the equation

  • @georgeanton302
    @georgeanton302 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey what exactly happened at 22:17, I've seen this happen to people before... is that like a ministroke?

  • @raminnikzad6317
    @raminnikzad6317 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    many thanks for putting this video
    @ 35:50 you could say easily that f(x) in that tiny range is f(a) and the rest is, according to definition of R, equal to 1 ..So the whole is f(a)

  • @sherinshajiphysics
    @sherinshajiphysics 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So simply ...😍😍😍

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the name it's attractive to speak dirak n dinğer equation

  • @rakeshmeher7255
    @rakeshmeher7255 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    24:15 , how volume element dx dy equal to that.. can one explain plz ??

  • @Benzene6.023
    @Benzene6.023 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great lecture....

  • @gerrynightingale9045
    @gerrynightingale9045 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    "All of energy and matter that existed still exists. The actions of matter enable energy to
    become manifest".

  • @rana000
    @rana000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir,I have a question..for proving Schrodinger you take a wave function psi=Ae^i(kx-wt).how it is related to the particle...

    • @kuldipkunghadkar6802
      @kuldipkunghadkar6802 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then he transformed k(wave) into h cross p (particle)

  • @chakrapanigautam2547
    @chakrapanigautam2547 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does the imaginary part of a plane wave represent? Why we use this particular form of wave for the derivation of Schrodinger wave equation.?

  • @t.vigneshnayak7886
    @t.vigneshnayak7886 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Crystal clear..

  • @sureshapte7674
    @sureshapte7674 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks for wonderfull exposition

  • @ozzyfromspace
    @ozzyfromspace 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To be honest, Hand wavy arguments confuse me... A rigorous mathematical treatment from first principles would have worked far better in this instance. Anyway, some people seem to like this style of teaching, so whatcha gon do? Wish you all the best, I’m finna head out now 👋🏽

  • @minhokim8263
    @minhokim8263 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, I have a questions on pronouncing Greek alphabet, why do many physicist pronounce Ψ [sai] instead of [psi]? I believe it is very wrong as the alphabet isn't English but Greek so well educated scientists should respect other cultures.

    • @SoumilSahu
      @SoumilSahu 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't understand how mispronunciation denotes disrespect. People can never pronounce Ramanujan's name right, but as an Indian, I'm never offended.

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    delta del dirak all deals in a mixro system na ? why is it not possible see when we talk about galaxies than our planet is a mixro system na than will the behavior changed from that reference of dirax fun?

  • @formodapk
    @formodapk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    if electron or proton is neither a particle nor wave then what is it??

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    18 you sir diffentied it twice it given you Ke so how do we know what it will give if further diffentied also let me know how do you know it's a kinetic energy sir ....?

  • @shubhamtiwari1415
    @shubhamtiwari1415 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks for the Dirac delta function

  • @anuragchitra7526
    @anuragchitra7526 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sir for explaining in such a nice way

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    so wave function psi is a complex or we can also write in terms of sin n Cose form ?

  • @sherinshajiphysics
    @sherinshajiphysics 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much sir...

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    41 dirak system graph as a linear system na ?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    57 we do have a lot of nursery drawing in physics 😊?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    14 total energy is kinetic still I wanna know why we do so as due to so small mass or sir there you ignore gravity ......okay sir still is this dirak equation is not only valid micro but also in macro na than sir let me know that why we see that dinger equation do forget about the potential energy in 1D ?

  • @Sonitsharma44
    @Sonitsharma44 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Must appreciated work sir thank you

  • @vinayrana610
    @vinayrana610 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks professor

  • @Abhi.Sharma
    @Abhi.Sharma 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    could anyone please tell me the name of the book he is using?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    31 what a function sir wonderful I liked that drawings it seems good to make Dirac graphics i like that system of drawing wanna get computer graphics for the same sir is it possible direct me .

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    discontinuity in a function is Dirac delta function

  • @muhammadbilaljaved2238
    @muhammadbilaljaved2238 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you Please share the notes of these Quantum Lectures

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    respect to the system of discontinuity than Dirac delta function here we got so functional system as of Dirac + gaussian + graph of gaussian function so gaussian function is used in reference to wave nature n behaviour deriving cool

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    29 awesome I feel good in phase now but still there is fantasy calculations n I like only to do simple way let's find so

  • @prathameshlaware3503
    @prathameshlaware3503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't understand where the psi first came from and how the first equation psi=Ae^i(Kx-wt) was taken at the first place

    • @ScalarSeeker
      @ScalarSeeker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Schrodinger equation is a wave equation and in order to prove that, we used a plane wave solution ψ=Aexp(i[kx-wt])
      Thats why its not consider a derivation because we used a plane wave to show that it satisfy a wave equation.

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    24 what we are doing for?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    34 you can even make a nursery boy accept the concept sir that was a mountain n a building where function seems as a crows n vultures I like that

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    54 taller sharper n coherent ?

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why has the wave function this kind of form (5:38)? Here is the answer:
    th-cam.com/video/T6TQHNXy5Wg/w-d-xo.html

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Mathematical sciences I have to, because I'm too dumb to understand them ;-)

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    8 1d plane wave awesome still I can't understand why he used so fancy symbols about de brouglie! yaa why ?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    38 diraķ sign is quite fantasy symbol consider a Birsa munda bhagwan doing same derivation what would be his sign sir awesomest

  • @MisterRorschach90
    @MisterRorschach90 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was shocked to learn you don't even need derivation skills above calc 2 to derive that equation.

  • @PKP2021
    @PKP2021 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks sir j

  • @krushnachandrashankhua637
    @krushnachandrashankhua637 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u sir

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    we do need fourier system so some equation sir we need to make some okay do know that wave nor particle is but a hypothetical system it's a function what are you making me say that it's a function so just imagine the creator first doing some random maths and He found a function n put in some computing system lo you see what He got ...oh it's a subatomic particle : party now?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want better name to seems difficult see if wanna name mine self as kadifrandaneonineygenedia too difficult? TRY new material as zdoz dozdozd how is it sir say as abia shiffar /surfer?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    38 sigma is the ?

  • @amaljeevk3950
    @amaljeevk3950 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thus here wave function psi graph on 47

  • @ridael-mehdawe4681
    @ridael-mehdawe4681 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    appreciated

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    20 it really lacks rigour I understand still can't digest

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorimuthu Ayyanar Tamil God name changed as schorindger.

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    DeBrogllie ==> pronounced "debroyy."

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    13 I'd there any bihari there who solved in his language?

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    SorimuthuIyyanar Tamil country God name changed as schorindger.

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    de brouglie me having so simple name as you see I am Ali

  • @kioloventura6812
    @kioloventura6812 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    i came here from watching faze

  • @kabandajamilu9036
    @kabandajamilu9036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir