Rylands Vs Fletcher Case study | Strict liability | Law of Torts | CS Payal Popli
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มี.ค. 2021
- Rylands Vs Fletcher Case study | Strict liability | Law of Torts | CS Payal Popli
#rylandsvsfletcher #casestudy #lagalawareness #strictliability
#lawoftorts #caselaw #torts #lawstudents #casestudyforlawstudents
Rylands v Fletcher [1868] was a decision by the House of Lords which established a new area of English tort law.
Rylands employed contractors to build a reservoir, playing no active role in its construction. When the contractors discovered a series of old coal shafts improperly filled with debris, they chose to continue work rather than properly blocking them up. The result was that on 11 December 1860, shortly after being filled for the first time, Rylands' reservoir burst and flooded a neighbouring mine, run by Fletcher, causing £937 worth of damage (equivalent to £88,700 in 2019).
Fletcher brought a claim under negligence against Rylands, through which the case eventually went to the Exchequer of Pleas.The majority ruled in favour of Rylands. Bramwell B, however, dissenting, argued that the claimant had the right to enjoy his land free of interference from water, and that as a result the defendant was guilty of trespass and the commissioning of a nuisance. Bramwell's argument was affirmed, both by the Court of Exchequer Chamber and the House of Lords, leading to the development of the "Rule in Rylands v Fletcher"; that "the person who for his own purposes brings on his lands and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape".
No right "to enjoy property" exists in UK black letter law, and it is this decision upon which stare decisis is built in the area.
Check out our playlists-
CSEET -
• Meaning of Company |Wh...
Law -
• How Civil cases differ...
Case studies-
• Salomon vs. Salomon an...
Difference between Law-
• How Liquidated damages...
Connect with us-
Instagram- padhaku_log?igs...
Facebook- / padhaku-log-1010913014...
Mail id- padhakulog14@gmail.com
Watsapp-9630227777
Telegram-9630227777
About us:
Padhaku Log is a platform specially created for those students who live in remote areas and don’t have access to fancy coaching classes. A channel which wants to bring parity in knowledge level of all.
th-cam.com/play/PLAxciooZTrO0XlkrF3D-DCssvNxaZ-p4C.html
Thank you so much ma'am. It is understood very easily.
Such an amazing content it is
....and tnq for your reply
So easy to understand please make some videos on contract case laws !
awesomely explained thank you so much
VERY GOOD EXPLANATION MAM KEEP IT UP THANK YOU MAM 🙏😇
Perfect explanation , it helped actually...
Much effective and easily understandable 💜
Thank you mam for your support
Thnx a lot mam ...so informative as i prepare for torts paper (ku)...
Wonderful video . Thank u mam.
Very good explanation... 👍👍👍
I love you yaar ...kiya mast samjaya he ...aur btw tumahari explanations skills are at top 🎉
❤️❤️❤️
Nicely explained 👍
Such an great explanation ❤ thank you mam 🫶🏻
So much efforts, thanks a lot
❤️❤️
I really liked the visuals used in video 😊
Very very nice mam thank you so much mam 🙏🙏🙏
So unique video 👍👍👍❤️❤️❤️
Thank you!
Superb, Thankyou
Thanks a lot yar , finally muje pta chala k ye dikhta kese h.
Thank u so much mam☺️..it's helps me in my clat prepartion 🙏🙏..plzz ap aur vedios bnate rhe 👌👌..humare liye ❤️
Ji zarur ❤️❤️
Thank u mam for the video❤️🥰😊
Mind-blowing 👌👌👌👌💞
Nice presentation 🇮🇪
Thanks very helpfull❤
Thanks.... Very much helping ❤
❤️❤️❤️
Excellent
Thank you maam
It's very 👏 👏 👏 brilliant
Nice 👍👍 keep going
Waah what a explanation
Thanku so much :)
Thank you Padhaku Log.
Thank you CS Payal Popli ji.
Best Wishes.
Khwaja Ram.
Very nice mam
Thanks Mam..🙏🙏👍
❤️❤️❤️
Generally in case file it is written as
Plaintiff vs Defendant
So in this case Rylands is plaintiff and fletcher is defendant who is owner of mill and caused damage to Ryland's property
But I think Fletcher is plaintiff who has files a plaint against ryland
Nope ryland is the defendent and fletcher is plantiff as fletcher's property was damaged
@@kii3552 yes you are right I acknowledge but general rule is different
@@haideraliaslam9045 I might have been mistaken but the case itself was against Rylands. Kindly let me know if you discover this case. It will help me out a lot
Didi bahut acha hai videos
I need more case study videos
Kya Ryland IC ke upar negligence ka case kr skta hai????
Tx mam लय भारी tx mam
Helpful 😊
❤️❤️
Hi it was good work, by mistakenly on one place you said reliance. Please change the ward to ryland. Keep it up
Noted*
Hindu law muslim law law of contracts consumer protection etc ma'am plz sab par banaya karo video ur explanation is too good ... either in marketing or law 🤍🤍
Yes mam dog ka owner responsible hoga and uski dog ki wajah sae jo mr B ko problem hui uska treatment ka paisa v dog kae owner ko dena hoga yani mr A ko
Thanks a bunch ,,sis.your way of teaching is really good
Can you please make more videos on tort law
Where can I find more case studies
Mam isme Dog wale case ko bhi kar sakte h kya
Thank u mam for this vdo 🥰 mam mujhe notes chahiye how can I found
Passing off, absolute liability ka bhi explain hona maam😢😢
Nice m Am,...,
Thank u mam
❤️❤️
Rylands was pantiff & Fletcher was defendant.
U should have checked your facts before uploading this video. Thank you.
Yeah you are right
Mym ur right..... Ye baki log aap ko destract kar rahe hai 👌👌👌
thank you
❤️❤️
@@padhakulog mam
is doing llb has any advantage ?
I want notes for this to write the assignment
Hello..I'm from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
I'm a law student..and your videos help in a huge portion remembering the topics
And thank you so much 💙 for this video...
ma'am phle name to plaintiff ka likha jata hai...pls correct if I am wrong...lekin isme Rylands ka hai?
Yes phele name plaintiff ka hi aata hai hamesha .....but in this case Rylands who lost the case went for an APPEAL and therefore the case became Rylands v Fletcher.....
Or jo city m awary dogs hoty hen un k lye kon zimedar h?
Mam please or bhi CSEET ke topics ki video upload kariye pleaseeee mam
Very helpful video ma,am🙏🙏
:)
Mam I am law student thanks
College me aise kyun nahi padhate 😢😢
So GOOD ❤
yeah, i've also this question??
Thank you mam please law of tort ki video continue kre 🙏🙏🙏
Fletcher was the owner of Mill.
Rylands was the plaintiff.
No Actually the case was Fletcher v Rylands in the trial court but when Rylands lose he went for an appeal and therefore the case became Rylands v Fletcher..pls clear this confusion.....Maine similar comment kahin aur videos pe bhi dekha hai ...par ye galat hai ........
Fletcher was coal mine owner,
How can i get notes
Master and servant relationship also explain
Clap👏😀
Rylands vs Fletcher case study
Jo diagram apne dikhya hai vo spill way hai
Ma'am aap 12 class ka all chapter ka video bna dijiye legal study ka
.. please Ma'am
Ji
Ma'am aap kisi bhi topic ko bahut achhe se explain krti h.u 🥰🥰 r best teacher of legal study
Liable kon hoga, Ryland ?
How is this Ryland VS Fletcher? Shouldn't Fletcher be the plaintiff?
Yes orginally the case must be Fletcher v Rylands in The Trial Court. But when Rylands lose he went for an Appeal and therefore the case becomes Rylands v Fletcher.....so don't be confused
Independent contractor ???
Mam, I am confused because I read this case and some textbook wrote Rylands is the plaintiff and some Fletcher is the plaintiff.... as the name of plaintiff comes first in any case, please concern mam
Exactly Rylands ne Fletcher p case kia. Ye galat bta rhi h
@@anubhargav6218 and Rylands ne Kis basis pe case kiya tha.? Kuch b Mtlb!
@@mybackupplan105 ek br aap case re read kro apko pta chl jayega. Ye opposite bta rhi h
@@mybackupplan105 plaintiff ko defendant or defendant ko plaintiff bta rhi h
@@anubhargav6218 toh aap kehna chah rhi rylands plaintiff tha?
Rylands ne fletcher pe case Kia tha is case me
Reland Is plantiff
Mam aur case law samjhye🙏🙌
Ji krti or upload ❤️
@@padhakulog thanku so much mam🙏☺ it's really helping us for cs excutive prepration
Rylands k uper case Banega
Do you have notes please share with me
ryland was plaintiff and defendant was fletcher...
Sorry but vice versa ( ryland is defandant and Fletcher is plaintiff)
*assalam alaikum ji alhamdulillah everytime app or apke Ammi abbu Jaan hamasha khush rahe yeh Dua karte hai ji Ameen Allah pakh apko bhi khush rahe yeh Dua karte hai ji Ameen if you don't mind you are sacred soul in the world 🌎 you are silent queen 👑 I am right 👍 ji Allah Hafiz 🙏🏼
@@TH-camPratham0pyes
Fletcher was defendant & Ryland was plaintiff...
ryland was defendent
kyuki uske shaft ki vajah se fletcher(plantiff) ki property ka damage huaa
isliye fletcher (plaintiff) ne compensation ke liye case kiya
Oner ki mistake
ryalnd defendant and fletcher plantif
Akka telugu lo kuda video patandi
Plaintiff kon h mam
See Parties in a case wali video
Madam, aajkal dog bite pr 14 injection nhi lgaye jate, sirf 2 injection hee lgaye jaate hain😁😆
Mam glti to kutte ki h ..lekin us glti ke liye jimmedar malik ko thahraya jayega
Kutta rkha kisne hua tha
Fletcher is real culprit
😂