Wow streamers act to get an audience? HOLY what a revelation Lol in all seriousness, yea some streamers are annoying af and turn it on a bit too much, but ALL streamers are being a character. Even the ones who’s character is being “real.” It’s a psychological quirk of putting a human in front of a camera and giving them an audience. Just funny to me when people act surprised that streamers are acting over the top. There’s a market for that
I don’t understand the guy in the vid, it’s fine to not agree with your points, but his responses were just obnoxious so I don’t understand how he could expect anyone to take his side or agree with his points.
If you can't find any flaw in your favorite game, you're a fanboy. Yes, harsh criticism does not mean hate. People are extreme on the Internet, you are either on their side, or against them, no neutral.
I really like how well you take criticism and your open to see both sides of an argument. not everyone can do this. that’s the difference between a man and a boy…
I liked that this video wasn't just you being angry or dismissing (?) every single point he made. However you "missed" two things that he didn't outright say because, obviously, his chat on Twitch already knows. He said this in his response video to Joseph Anderson's critique: (I'm not trying to offend you or anything, just stating two "true" things that he said) - (11:18): yes, the bosses in this game have a "flowchart" that depends on your positioning. Basically every combo has different outcomes based on where you stand respectively (?) to the boss. Basic example, Maliketh's multiple "destined death airborne waves". He has 2 possible outcomes: either he does 3 of them and the triple slash at the end, or does only 2 of them and then does the "double shockwaves" after landing. This is caused on how much you're near to the boss. In most cases is "how near you're to the boss" but some attacks might have various (up to 3 as far as I know) "possibilities". Exemplī gratiā, Godfrey's double quick slashes,(1) if you roll diagonally and end up behind him he'll stop the combo, (2) if you roll into the double slashes and end up in front of him, he'll do a "chest high slash" (I wonder if anyone is stupid enough to get the reference), (3) but if you roll backwards he'll do another attack, but I'm not really sure of what it is (I haven't played the game in one month and a half and I've not experimented much on Godfrey). If I remember correctly it's like that "hitting the earth" attack (sorry for my horrible descriptions for them). By the way, this "flowchart" thing was also done by Bloodborne bosses (mostly the ones in the DLC, like Maria and orphan of Kos) and by the DS3 DLC bosses like Gael, but in a minor amount. Therefore, his point is that you can guess based on your positioning what attacks the boss is going to do thanks to the whole flowchart thing. I [opinion] don't think it's a bad design choice because it makes you experiment with bosses a lot of more than simply "learn how to dodge combos", and makes for it makes me want to refight bosses to experiment even more (let's hope for a DLC that let's you refight bosses like in sekiro). But obviously, it's just an opinion.... - (13:18) he said in his "response to Joseph Anderson's critique" video that a "scrub" is a person who might be good at the game or not, but doesn't understand the mechanics of the game and blames the game/other random things when they lose (or something like that) instead of acknowledging their mistakes. LupineOs thinks that Joseph is a scrub because he doesn't understand the flowchart thing I've just said and blames the supposed "RNG" for the "different attacks" happening. I think he's right on that part. Either way, I agreed with some of your takes and with some of his. I don't agree with your takes in your other elden ring videos, but I think this one has reasonable ones. I hope this helped you in a way.... [Holy sᚺit I need to stop using "" , seriously this useless block of test has more of them than actual punctuation lmao]
@@weirdo3116 I'm not the one who made the claim, but I agree with lupine, Anderson is a scrub, he has been for many other games too (look at his pontiff footage from his ds3 critique). I don't think it's really gatekeepy too, I mean, whose opinion is more reliable, of one who does understand something or of someone who doesn't understand said thing?
@@lorenzo8208 what other games besides the souls games is he a scrub in? asking cause I saw plenty of people saying similar things in the comments to that video but I didn't see any examples besides the souls series. idk what reliable opinions have to do with it not being gatekeepy. if we say that someone understanding a thing is more reliable than someone not understanding a thing then that is gatekeeping, to me. let me clarify that I don't see gatekeeping as inherently bad.
@@weirdo3116 if I have to give an example for a souls game, in his ds3 video (at around 30 minutes) he complains about Pontiff having 2 "unreactable" attacks, that however are so predictable you don't need them to be reactable to be dodgeable. If I have to give an example for not a souls game, in his god of war 2018 video (2hours and 30minutes in) he complains that the Valkyries have "inconsistent hyper armor", then he gives other "examples" and blames it off a "random chance of it happening(which is higher with the Valkyries)". If you analyze the Valkyrie footage, you can clearly see, in the clip where he didn't get hit by anything, the Valkyrie (Göndul to be exact) trying to dodge away but failing, and in the clip where he got hit, the Valkyrie not even attempting to dodge and going straight in a hyperarmor attack. Plus, in 3 playthroughts of higher difficulties each one, he couldn't understand that there are 2 different kinds of staggers (it's very long to explain, but it's basically that you can't always stagger bosses/enemies with runics or other attacks if you've already staggered them before with an opening of their own. It's more than that though), and yet I could with one on normal mode. He doesn't understand this mechanic and blames it off randomness (but atleast he acknowledges this way of thinking might be flawed) [Sorry if you didn't play the game and couldn't understand the example] About the last bit, I'd say that not really any opinion is valid on everything. You can't really ask anyone their opinion on a book if they've only read it partially or only know its story thanks to outside sources. If someone doesn't understand something, their opinion is valid but it has to be taken with a grain of salt. If I ask someone who doesn't understand how Maliketh works (like Joseph), how to beat him, they'll probably say "oh yeah, he purely relies on RNG and the only openings you're gonna get is with the claw, unless you switch your build to a spellcasting one while using also the mimic tear". But if you ask someone who does understand how the fight works, you'll get tips on how to defeat him, probably. Sorry for the very stupid example, but it's kinda my point. Joseph's opinions (on many things) still stands but are factually (and therefore, objectively) wrong and should be taken with a grain of salt.
@@lorenzo8208 for that valkyrie He mentions how it could be hyper armor that either triggers on certain attacks or it's gained after recieving a certain ammount of damage but that it doesn't make sense. He then mentions the random chance but says how he doesn't think that's the case since it works more often than not giving an estimate of 90% for attacks with staggers (except for the vals which have a lower chance). He does say it could still be random chance but that it doesn't make sense and instead gives another reason. That sometimes enemy attacks are qued up back to back and sets them in stone as unchangeable unless they die. and he suspects that when actions are qued up they can't be staggered. Now he can still be wrong but he absolutly doesn't blame it on randomness that last part sounds like gatekeeping to me. nothing about an opinion's validity or if it stands or not has to do with gate keeping. if you are saying that his opinions on many things are factually wrong and should be taken with a grain of salt that is gatekeeping. it's saying his opinion doesn't met the standard of a reviewer and because of that it shouldn't be taken as seriously as say someone like Lupine. I'd say someone saying to switch your build and/or use mimic tear are tips to defeat Maliketh. It may not be the tips they are looking for but they are useful tips.
I've tried to have discussions about ER and even if I disagreed with someone else, and vice versa, that was the end of it. We agreed to disagree about certain aspects and left it at that. But I never tried to gatekeep anyone. But to some people, any form of criticism = we just don't like ER or Souls games in general. I've been playing since the first DS and even though that game is my favorite in the franchise, I can still acknowledge its flaws. It's funny how he calls you the gatekeeper... but what does that make him?
“Joseph Anderson and anyone that agrees with him is a scrub” is essentially what he said. If that’s not the textbook definition of gatekeeping, I don’t know what is.
My 1 thing is at 25:10 when he said strength builds are bad. You need to build into your weapons’ stats, because I run a strength build with literally nothing else. No magic, no summons, no shield, I don’t even where a chest piece anymore(for fashion tho) but I can still hit for over 1k on a jump attack. Lupine had a valid point there, all in all it was a good response vid tho.
Haven't watched the video all the way through and I haven't played the game in a while so my feelings on it aren't fresh as seen with some of my past comments I had some disagreements but you had some points there's always give and take with reviewing like you can dislike a game and I do like how you admit one of your weaker points was the fire Giant in that video, the way this guy was handling you was like how Hassan handles topics on twitch where he just pauses the video and chooses something to attack without further context I think one of the points that I had a problem with back in the day (I'm too lazy to go through my comments) was the fact you did have low vigor I think for Radahn I think that's a fair assertion (he definitely did not word it properly) from the vigor you have it was either in the teens with talismans to boost your vigor or it was like 20 to 25 somewhere around there and I don't know if past me brought it up but it was definitely a thought of how did you get through the area before fighting him because say the T-Rex dogs they could hurt really bad if they hit you and had really good closing speed if you weren't on torrent but honestly that was an ancient video by this point in time and many different opinions have been made, What the hell happened to the video? It went down for a while and now it's back up what happened? Yeah PVP not very fun with more time under my belt I have invaded and I can count on one hand the amount of times I've invaded people and they've been alone I'm just not the greatest time I don't know if they've changed that recently because I haven't played in like a month but damn it was just painful sometimes even though it's easier to get into invading now because of their changes running into three v ones all the time is just annoying now doing the standard 1v1 dueling PvP that's actually pretty nice,
This guy was not looking for a debate or even just disagreeing with your points he just decided to be a prick, maybe that's how he talks but disagreeing about points is one thing but being purposefully demeaning and willfully ignorant of an argument is too far especially considering your review is overall you like the game.
It got copyright claimed, so I had to make some adjustments before re-posting. Yeah, the PVP portion of the video during his response I thought was the most egregious. I don't know, his responses there just didn't make much sense at all, almost like he didn't play the other games even though he clearly had. Granted his criticisms during the Radahn and Torrent during Fire giant criticism, like I say in the video, are totally valid.
I get the feeling that he's shitting on your reviews whenever possible and not even taking into account the context. Like he sees a clip, starts talking shit meanwhile completely disregarding any follow up points in your vid that are valid. Also how he mocks at your death at the meteor, it's bullshit. Everyone has their "first time encounter deaths" in Fromsoft games and it's completely normal, laughing at it is just arrogant and pretentious. Overall, I'm really impressed that you can reply calmly with reason against that kind of drama.
The camera during Fire Giant is absolutely a problem, acting like it's not is just straight up wrong lol. That goes for any of the giant fights within From Software games really.
My friend please don't pay any attention to people like him. They are so obsessed with " Western devs bad", they are not willing to rationally see things. they thrive on creating mediocre drama. I've played all Froms games, and Lore-wise, Bloodborne is my favorite BUT Combat-wise, Sekiro is my all time favorite. I've personally completed more than 150 full playthroughs without counting the gauntlet challenges. But Elden ring, especially the final 1/3 area/bosses. Give me a break. Just finished my 5th playthrough and can't understand it. So many RNG bs. God I love sekiro. And tbh I'm just waiting for God of War Ragnarok to wash away this memory from my mind. I said something on ER subreddit and they were calling me incel, like I didn't even talk about relationships lmao. Ignore this mofos. And I will Never trust these independent youtube reviewers.
youre arguing against a drunk dude, seems kinda unfair? You should probably get on stream with him and discuss, I feel like it would be some spicy content.
Maybe, then again he had the nerve to upload the video so I say it’s fair game. Like I said, I don’t associate with twitch streamers, but never say never I guess.
I agree with fire Giant. Such a cool looking boss. To have to fight his feet. You mention godskin duo. Why is he so hard? I had more trouble with godskin noble on my way to rykard
Fair response. I saw his video before I saw all of your videos and while I don’t 100% agree with you - the majority of your criticisms of the mechanics and jankiness of specific bosses is totally valid.
Ya know, it never made sense to me how fast the angry/illogical comments from outside the community rolled in by the time a video was uploaded...... Now it makes perfect sense.
@@parsap9587 yeah but the summon is only there if u did Alexanders Quest Which most players wouldnt have done Bernahl is there everytime regardless if u even met him before
Lol I know it looks like I had 7, but I promise you I was in the 20s AT LEAST. Granted, that's still not enough to fight Radahn at that point in the game, but you gotta pour points into Vigor into this game to have a decent health bar.
You took the criticism really well, although I disagree with your points on invasions, and Elden best was one of my favorites fights in the game. Everyone has their own opinions though
Haha that's okay, I understand I definitely didn't get everything right when it comes to Elden Ring criticisms. And thanks! I tried not to make this a mud-slinging contest, glad that seems to have worked out.
@@raigrex8362 Yes he was, dude. You dating him? What "valid" points did he make, apart from getting so mad and use the worst kinds of Gen Z "slangs"? lol
I kinda agree with both of your points but also disagree with both of you. I've seen some of your videos and I thought they were well made with points I agreed and disagreed with. Same with Lupine I saw that video and agreed on some things and disagreed with others. However the way he acted was a little childish in the manner and could've been less harsh. Now I'm an Elden Ring simp but I know where the game has it's problems. Malenia, Fire Giant, Foreskin duo, Valient gargoyles (didn't find until I googled how to get to Deeproot which was after I beat the game so I was stupidly over leveled) duo crucible Knight, and more. As well as areas such as Ordina, the snowfield, and the mountain tops. But I will die on the hill that Maliketh is an amazing boss. Overall I think both of you have valid points in some categories and not so much in others.
Idk who’s right, pretty entertaining though 👍 Ya know I think you guys would actually get along, you’ve got similar mindsets and like attitudes and stuff.
Imma really comment on a six month video lmao but I think invading and getting ganked isn’t really a bad thing. Being outnumbered/ganked is, (IMO! MY OPINION?!??!) kind of the point. You’re invading a players world. You’re taking out a group of people or a player with the sole intention of killing them. You’re not exploring the world, you’re not even interacting with enemies in most cases. You’re there to make them die, and part of the risk, part of the fun part of “invading a player” has always been the risk of a group taking you out or directly hunting you down. Why wouldn’t it be? You’re the invader in their world. Why would you NOT get ganked? When a group sees someone invaded their world, that’s EXCITING. You’re the interloper the outsider. Where are they? When are they gonna attack? If you have the chance to kill someone ruin their potential run up to the boss or they have potentially a lot of runes to lose, then there should be more of a challenge to the invader. You’re coming into their world fully prepared. They might be 1 health point before death and desperately trying to get their friends to help them survive.
I vehemently disagree with many of your critiques and takes on Elden Ring, however I must say that this video is a clinic of how to take and react to criticism. Very well done sir
Ngl, I was waiting for someone to make a video on this dude. LupineOs has to be one of the most toxic manchilds I have ever seen in the Souls community. The way he reacts to your points is so over-the-top, he's acting like you murdered his pet, when all you did was criticise the game. The amount of times he takes your points out of context is also incredibly asinine too. He also made a video "responding" to Joseph Anderson's video on Elden Ring, and he did the same exact things he did here. The video basically sounded more like a personal attack on Joe rather than a proper critique. He basically is the epitome of the Souls fanboy who thinks they're an elite gamer for playing Souls games. His audience seems to be equally as rabid judging from the chat in his streams, so its possible they're enabling his childish behaviour. Rant aside, fantastic video Quik. Really enjoyed this video.
3:35 dude you literally said in another stupid video that its too hard because you cant see how he is about to attack. so why would you say that "i dont see any reason how putting the camera up at the fire giant would help".
Because you still can’t see shit when you’re aiming to be below his legs. Sure, it helps when you’re away from him maybe, but the whole point is to say underneath him, for the first phase anyway. The camera is a problem in that fight, period.
@@thatguybis1997 "The camera is a problem in that fight, period." No, no it isn't. In between being able to look up and the audio cues, there is actually no problem at all.
Coming at the obviously very inebirated and hyperbolic acting man with the faux-exasperated "bro you're acting goofy" type stuff makes you seem honestly just even more petty and annoying than bro in the video. I'm not gonna sit here and slob you for "responding in such a good way!" that many of the comments here seem to be, and I'm sorry but a lot of your ER material is either straight up wrong, or just misinfo. Not trynna hate, just speak truth here, there seems like a big hug box here in the comments and i felt compelled to say something + being buzzed made this funny. ☮
Your...not friends with under the mayo? You guys give off the same vibe. Edited: 19:48 so do you really not know or are you hand waving it away by making a joke? He's wondering why you like taking a long time looking for the host in ds3 but hate taking a long time looking for the host in elden ring. Instead of saying it's quicker so it feels better you said something that made it seems like you like taking a while to find other player.
@@thatguybis1997 oh ... You like how long it takes to find players in elden ring. Mk. Got confused at some point. Sounded like you hate how long it takes. Edited:I mean hate. Gosh.
ER is more engaging than DS3 in pretty much every way, including pvp. Just admit you want ER to be a reskin of DS3. It's fine if you do but I don't think it would be nearly as good. Also, lupine pretty much took down all of your points.
@@thatguybis1997 Dark Souls 3 PVP is all about abusing a lot of glitches that the games has. But if you take those out of the equation, DS3 pvp is not as engaging as ER, most of the things that you can do in DS3 can be done in ER and it's way better. Straight Swords don't feel as bullshit now because the range is good and it doesn't blow half HP bar of your opponent away, backstabs feel so much better to execute, Ultras don't get shit on, magic/miracles are actually fun to use, powerstancing is back, and jumping attacks/dodges, variety of AoW to use with different build and weapons, etc. Makes me like ER more now (patch 1.07) edit: Some spelling errors, english is not my main language.
@@weirdo3116 pretty much every single PvPer in DS3 knows about estus cancel, backstab fishing with rapiers, has a dark/chaos build or uses a straight/curved sword...
The problem with disliking his approach to your videos can be applied to how you approached the response you got from others about your radahn boss review, You chose to make another video about a patch that then later got reverted after the video was made, in an attempt to clown on the people for finding your video incredibly flawed
Sure, but there’s a difference between making a joke, and being an asshole just because you disagree with someone. I still find that video funny to this day, even though the patch got reverted, and even though I admit that the Radahn video wasn’t one of my greatest moments. Like, if the patch hadn’t got reverted, would you be telling me that it was an improper response? Either way, it wasn’t meant to be taken seriously.
@@lazguy6936ah he's right you have to have insane reflexes for a lot of enemies I mean fking insane luipine even says he almost gets caught of guard by some of his attacks during radahn and I'd like to see your flow chart when godskin apostle does his double right swipe cuz I highly doubt your dodging that shit. Luipine says himself it's laughable to try predict a boss. Him being generic aside he's right I don't know what your on about maybe you mean undodgable
@@lazguy6936 when did he give you that impression? I didn't pay to close attention to both of their points but what I do know is that the streamer was acting so childish and obnoxious that I got a headache from watching him. I thought the youtube guy was irritating enough with his reactions although that is somewhat justified by the length the other guy went to insult him. If you're comment should be directed at anyone then it shoul be the streaming...
Not sure who’s in the right. The obnoxious guy is belligerently giving you crap but you also make some pretty bad points in your original vid. So it’s somewhat not surprising that someone mocked you to the extent that he did.
![ถ้าเธอไม่รักทำไมไม่บอกฉัน - PAPER [ Musicvideo ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pfeBhDda7m4/mqdefault.jpg)
![ถ้าเธอไม่รักทำไมไม่บอกฉัน - PAPER [ Musicvideo ]](/img/tr.png)
why is he yelling like that ? its like he is 'acting' and 'raging' just to get audience ?
Wow streamers act to get an audience? HOLY what a revelation
Lol in all seriousness, yea some streamers are annoying af and turn it on a bit too much, but ALL streamers are being a character. Even the ones who’s character is being “real.” It’s a psychological quirk of putting a human in front of a camera and giving them an audience. Just funny to me when people act surprised that streamers are acting over the top. There’s a market for that
I don’t understand the guy in the vid, it’s fine to not agree with your points, but his responses were just obnoxious so I don’t understand how he could expect anyone to take his side or agree with his points.
If you can't find any flaw in your favorite game, you're a fanboy.
Yes, harsh criticism does not mean hate. People are extreme on the Internet, you are either on their side, or against them, no neutral.
I really like how well you take criticism and your open to see both sides of an argument. not everyone can do this. that’s the difference between a man and a boy…
I liked that this video wasn't just you being angry or dismissing (?) every single point he made. However you "missed" two things that he didn't outright say because, obviously, his chat on Twitch already knows. He said this in his response video to Joseph Anderson's critique:
(I'm not trying to offend you or anything, just stating two "true" things that he said)
- (11:18): yes, the bosses in this game have a "flowchart" that depends on your positioning. Basically every combo has different outcomes based on where you stand respectively (?) to the boss. Basic example, Maliketh's multiple "destined death airborne waves". He has 2 possible outcomes: either he does 3 of them and the triple slash at the end, or does only 2 of them and then does the "double shockwaves" after landing. This is caused on how much you're near to the boss. In most cases is "how near you're to the boss" but some attacks might have various (up to 3 as far as I know) "possibilities". Exemplī gratiā, Godfrey's double quick slashes,(1) if you roll diagonally and end up behind him he'll stop the combo, (2) if you roll into the double slashes and end up in front of him, he'll do a "chest high slash" (I wonder if anyone is stupid enough to get the reference), (3) but if you roll backwards he'll do another attack, but I'm not really sure of what it is (I haven't played the game in one month and a half and I've not experimented much on Godfrey). If I remember correctly it's like that "hitting the earth" attack (sorry for my horrible descriptions for them). By the way, this "flowchart" thing was also done by Bloodborne bosses (mostly the ones in the DLC, like Maria and orphan of Kos) and by the DS3 DLC bosses like Gael, but in a minor amount.
Therefore, his point is that you can guess based on your positioning what attacks the boss is going to do thanks to the whole flowchart thing. I [opinion] don't think it's a bad design choice because it makes you experiment with bosses a lot of more than simply "learn how to dodge combos", and makes for it makes me want to refight bosses to experiment even more (let's hope for a DLC that let's you refight bosses like in sekiro). But obviously, it's just an opinion....
- (13:18) he said in his "response to Joseph Anderson's critique" video that a "scrub" is a person who might be good at the game or not, but doesn't understand the mechanics of the game and blames the game/other random things when they lose (or something like that) instead of acknowledging their mistakes. LupineOs thinks that Joseph is a scrub because he doesn't understand the flowchart thing I've just said and blames the supposed "RNG" for the "different attacks" happening. I think he's right on that part.
Either way, I agreed with some of your takes and with some of his. I don't agree with your takes in your other elden ring videos, but I think this one has reasonable ones. I hope this helped you in a way....
[Holy sᚺit I need to stop using "" , seriously this useless block of test has more of them than actual punctuation lmao]
idk if that clarification on what scrub means makes it any less gatekeepy
@@weirdo3116 I'm not the one who made the claim, but I agree with lupine, Anderson is a scrub, he has been for many other games too (look at his pontiff footage from his ds3 critique). I don't think it's really gatekeepy too, I mean, whose opinion is more reliable, of one who does understand something or of someone who doesn't understand said thing?
@@lorenzo8208 what other games besides the souls games is he a scrub in? asking cause I saw plenty of people saying similar things in the comments to that video but I didn't see any examples besides the souls series.
idk what reliable opinions have to do with it not being gatekeepy. if we say that someone understanding a thing is more reliable than someone not understanding a thing then that is gatekeeping, to me.
let me clarify that I don't see gatekeeping as inherently bad.
@@weirdo3116 if I have to give an example for a souls game, in his ds3 video (at around 30 minutes) he complains about Pontiff having 2 "unreactable" attacks, that however are so predictable you don't need them to be reactable to be dodgeable.
If I have to give an example for not a souls game, in his god of war 2018 video (2hours and 30minutes in) he complains that the Valkyries have "inconsistent hyper armor", then he gives other "examples" and blames it off a "random chance of it happening(which is higher with the Valkyries)". If you analyze the Valkyrie footage, you can clearly see, in the clip where he didn't get hit by anything, the Valkyrie (Göndul to be exact) trying to dodge away but failing, and in the clip where he got hit, the Valkyrie not even attempting to dodge and going straight in a hyperarmor attack. Plus, in 3 playthroughts of higher difficulties each one, he couldn't understand that there are 2 different kinds of staggers (it's very long to explain, but it's basically that you can't always stagger bosses/enemies with runics or other attacks if you've already staggered them before with an opening of their own. It's more than that though), and yet I could with one on normal mode. He doesn't understand this mechanic and blames it off randomness (but atleast he acknowledges this way of thinking might be flawed)
[Sorry if you didn't play the game and couldn't understand the example]
About the last bit, I'd say that not really any opinion is valid on everything. You can't really ask anyone their opinion on a book if they've only read it partially or only know its story thanks to outside sources. If someone doesn't understand something, their opinion is valid but it has to be taken with a grain of salt. If I ask someone who doesn't understand how Maliketh works (like Joseph), how to beat him, they'll probably say "oh yeah, he purely relies on RNG and the only openings you're gonna get is with the claw, unless you switch your build to a spellcasting one while using also the mimic tear". But if you ask someone who does understand how the fight works, you'll get tips on how to defeat him, probably. Sorry for the very stupid example, but it's kinda my point. Joseph's opinions (on many things) still stands but are factually (and therefore, objectively) wrong and should be taken with a grain of salt.
@@lorenzo8208 for that valkyrie He mentions how it could be hyper armor that either triggers on certain attacks or it's gained after recieving a certain ammount of damage but that it doesn't make sense. He then mentions the random chance but says how he doesn't think that's the case since it works more often than not giving an estimate of 90% for attacks with staggers (except for the vals which have a lower chance). He does say it could still be random chance but that it doesn't make sense and instead gives another reason. That sometimes enemy attacks are qued up back to back and sets them in stone as unchangeable unless they die. and he suspects that when actions are qued up they can't be staggered.
Now he can still be wrong but he absolutly doesn't blame it on randomness
that last part sounds like gatekeeping to me. nothing about an opinion's validity or if it stands or not has to do with gate keeping. if you are saying that his opinions on many things are factually wrong and should be taken with a grain of salt that is gatekeeping. it's saying his opinion doesn't met the standard of a reviewer and because of that it shouldn't be taken as seriously as say someone like Lupine.
I'd say someone saying to switch your build and/or use mimic tear are tips to defeat Maliketh. It may not be the tips they are looking for but they are useful tips.
I've tried to have discussions about ER and even if I disagreed with someone else, and vice versa, that was the end of it. We agreed to disagree about certain aspects and left it at that. But I never tried to gatekeep anyone. But to some people, any form of criticism = we just don't like ER or Souls games in general. I've been playing since the first DS and even though that game is my favorite in the franchise, I can still acknowledge its flaws. It's funny how he calls you the gatekeeper... but what does that make him?
“Joseph Anderson and anyone that agrees with him is a scrub” is essentially what he said.
If that’s not the textbook definition of gatekeeping, I don’t know what is.
My 1 thing is at 25:10 when he said strength builds are bad. You need to build into your weapons’ stats, because I run a strength build with literally nothing else. No magic, no summons, no shield, I don’t even where a chest piece anymore(for fashion tho) but I can still hit for over 1k on a jump attack. Lupine had a valid point there, all in all it was a good response vid tho.
Haven't watched the video all the way through and I haven't played the game in a while so my feelings on it aren't fresh as seen with some of my past comments I had some disagreements but you had some points there's always give and take with reviewing like you can dislike a game and I do like how you admit one of your weaker points was the fire Giant in that video,
the way this guy was handling you was like how Hassan handles topics on twitch where he just pauses the video and chooses something to attack without further context I think one of the points that I had a problem with back in the day (I'm too lazy to go through my comments) was the fact you did have low vigor I think for Radahn I think that's a fair assertion (he definitely did not word it properly) from the vigor you have it was either in the teens with talismans to boost your vigor or it was like 20 to 25 somewhere around there and I don't know if past me brought it up but it was definitely a thought of how did you get through the area before fighting him because say the T-Rex dogs they could hurt really bad if they hit you and had really good closing speed if you weren't on torrent but honestly that was an ancient video by this point in time and many different opinions have been made,
What the hell happened to the video? It went down for a while and now it's back up what happened?
Yeah PVP not very fun with more time under my belt I have invaded and I can count on one hand the amount of times I've invaded people and they've been alone I'm just not the greatest time I don't know if they've changed that recently because I haven't played in like a month but damn it was just painful sometimes even though it's easier to get into invading now because of their changes running into three v ones all the time is just annoying now doing the standard 1v1 dueling PvP that's actually pretty nice,
This guy was not looking for a debate or even just disagreeing with your points he just decided to be a prick, maybe that's how he talks but disagreeing about points is one thing but being purposefully demeaning and willfully ignorant of an argument is too far especially considering your review is overall you like the game.
It got copyright claimed, so I had to make some adjustments before re-posting.
Yeah, the PVP portion of the video during his response I thought was the most egregious. I don't know, his responses there just didn't make much sense at all, almost like he didn't play the other games even though he clearly had.
Granted his criticisms during the Radahn and Torrent during Fire giant criticism, like I say in the video, are totally valid.
I get the feeling that he's shitting on your reviews whenever possible and not even taking into account the context. Like he sees a clip, starts talking shit meanwhile completely disregarding any follow up points in your vid that are valid. Also how he mocks at your death at the meteor, it's bullshit. Everyone has their "first time encounter deaths" in Fromsoft games and it's completely normal, laughing at it is just arrogant and pretentious. Overall, I'm really impressed that you can reply calmly with reason against that kind of drama.
The camera is also a problem in DS3 Unamed Soldier dude thats second phase is a fire breathing dragon.
The camera during Fire Giant is absolutely a problem, acting like it's not is just straight up wrong lol.
That goes for any of the giant fights within From Software games really.
@@thatguybis1997 Haven't played the fire giant so can't speak on it. Hope it's not as brutal as it seems though but attacking feet is always annoying.
This guy is something different I'll say
I did have a lot of trouble with regal ancestor spirit, saying that I was underleveled and just pushed through it without trying to get stronger
Perfectly fair response. Good on you for sticking up for yourself.
My friend please don't pay any attention to people like him. They are so obsessed with " Western devs bad", they are not willing to rationally see things. they thrive on creating mediocre drama. I've played all Froms games, and Lore-wise, Bloodborne is my favorite BUT Combat-wise, Sekiro is my all time favorite. I've personally completed more than 150 full playthroughs without counting the gauntlet challenges. But Elden ring, especially the final 1/3 area/bosses. Give me a break. Just finished my 5th playthrough and can't understand it. So many RNG bs. God I love sekiro. And tbh I'm just waiting for God of War Ragnarok to wash away this memory from my mind. I said something on ER subreddit and they were calling me incel, like I didn't even talk about relationships lmao. Ignore this mofos. And I will Never trust these independent youtube reviewers.
Ha! That's just Reddit in general. Stay faaar away from there when you can.
Quik fighting the Fire Giant be like: 1:27
Yeah this guy needs to do more research before putting his foot in his mouth.
youre arguing against a drunk dude, seems kinda unfair? You should probably get on stream with him and discuss, I feel like it would be some spicy content.
Maybe, then again he had the nerve to upload the video so I say it’s fair game.
Like I said, I don’t associate with twitch streamers, but never say never I guess.
I agree with fire Giant. Such a cool looking boss. To have to fight his feet. You mention godskin duo. Why is he so hard? I had more trouble with godskin noble on my way to rykard
Sending you some love from Lupine keep up the work man! ❤
Fair response. I saw his video before I saw all of your videos and while I don’t 100% agree with you - the majority of your criticisms of the mechanics and jankiness of specific bosses is totally valid.
Ya know, it never made sense to me how fast the angry/illogical comments from outside the community rolled in by the time a video was uploaded......
Now it makes perfect sense.
Fire Giant , Elden Noodle are the worst fights in the game
Even the Godskin duo is fair since u can summon Bernahl and your own summon to help
You can summen for fire giant
@@parsap9587 yeah but the summon is only there if u did Alexanders Quest
Which most players wouldnt have done
Bernahl is there everytime regardless if u even met him before
@@parsap9587 also Bernahl can solo them to Half HP and he doesnt die thru the fight since he is a tank and he can also heal
@@LordOfChaos.x you can summon ashes.
You were complaining ab getting one shot when you had like 7 vigor i agree with him💀
Lol I know it looks like I had 7, but I promise you I was in the 20s AT LEAST. Granted, that's still not enough to fight Radahn at that point in the game, but you gotta pour points into Vigor into this game to have a decent health bar.
@@thatguybis1997 you have to upgrade health in order to have better health, who would've figured
You took the criticism really well, although I disagree with your points on invasions, and Elden best was one of my favorites fights in the game. Everyone has their own opinions though
Haha that's okay, I understand I definitely didn't get everything right when it comes to Elden Ring criticisms.
And thanks! I tried not to make this a mud-slinging contest, glad that seems to have worked out.
Nice DBZ Budokai music in there 👍
Yes I watched his video first and then I watched yours and realized he was going way overboard.
Glad I wasn't the only one. And good thing I decided on responding.
I just gotta say you are so much more humble than most fromsoft players and you're hilarious never stop pls lol
Nah he wasn't going overboard at all
@@raigrex8362 Yes he was, dude. You dating him? What "valid" points did he make, apart from getting so mad and use the worst kinds of Gen Z "slangs"? lol
I kinda agree with both of your points but also disagree with both of you. I've seen some of your videos and I thought they were well made with points I agreed and disagreed with. Same with Lupine I saw that video and agreed on some things and disagreed with others. However the way he acted was a little childish in the manner and could've been less harsh. Now I'm an Elden Ring simp but I know where the game has it's problems. Malenia, Fire Giant, Foreskin duo, Valient gargoyles (didn't find until I googled how to get to Deeproot which was after I beat the game so I was stupidly over leveled) duo crucible Knight, and more. As well as areas such as Ordina, the snowfield, and the mountain tops. But I will die on the hill that Maliketh is an amazing boss. Overall I think both of you have valid points in some categories and not so much in others.
Lupine was LITERALLY (his favorite word) acting like a childish arse. What a terrible personality.
The dude with glasses was a man child, and yet you "agree" with his "points"? lol
Idk who’s right, pretty entertaining though 👍
Ya know I think you guys would actually get along, you’ve got similar mindsets and like attitudes and stuff.
Imma really comment on a six month video lmao but
I think invading and getting ganked isn’t really a bad thing. Being outnumbered/ganked is, (IMO! MY OPINION?!??!)
kind of the point.
You’re invading a players world. You’re taking out a group of people or a player with the sole intention of killing them. You’re not exploring the world, you’re not even interacting with enemies in most cases. You’re there to make them die, and part of the risk, part of the fun part of “invading a player” has always been the risk of a group taking you out or directly hunting you down.
Why wouldn’t it be?
You’re the invader in their world. Why would you NOT get ganked? When a group sees someone invaded their world, that’s EXCITING. You’re the interloper the outsider. Where are they? When are they gonna attack?
If you have the chance to kill someone ruin their potential run up to the boss or they have potentially a lot of runes to lose, then there should be more of a challenge to the invader. You’re coming into their world fully prepared. They might be 1 health point before death and desperately trying to get their friends to help them survive.
Did u watch his response?
It’s pretty good.
I vehemently disagree with many of your critiques and takes on Elden Ring, however I must say that this video is a clinic of how to take and react to criticism. Very well done sir
You get a like bro. Yeah he hosed your shit, but you stood there and took it. Major props.
He didn't "hose" anything, dude, except himself. Change the profile picture of yours. You're no "chad". lol
Ngl, I was waiting for someone to make a video on this dude. LupineOs has to be one of the most toxic manchilds I have ever seen in the Souls community. The way he reacts to your points is so over-the-top, he's acting like you murdered his pet, when all you did was criticise the game. The amount of times he takes your points out of context is also incredibly asinine too.
He also made a video "responding" to Joseph Anderson's video on Elden Ring, and he did the same exact things he did here. The video basically sounded more like a personal attack on Joe rather than a proper critique.
He basically is the epitome of the Souls fanboy who thinks they're an elite gamer for playing Souls games. His audience seems to be equally as rabid judging from the chat in his streams, so its possible they're enabling his childish behaviour.
Rant aside, fantastic video Quik. Really enjoyed this video.
Thanks for the fantastic comment Dylan, you have yourself a damn good one.
The dickeating is crazy
ngl his joseph anderson video, while he is flaming him, does contain some valid points (like most videos)
Wow so that's all what you took from that Joseph video? Wow.
But Joseph Anderson’s review was actual shit. He made so much random shit up and tried playing the game like its ds3
3:35 dude you literally said in another stupid video that its too hard because you cant see how he is about to attack. so why would you say that "i dont see any reason how putting the camera up at the fire giant would help".
Because you still can’t see shit when you’re aiming to be below his legs. Sure, it helps when you’re away from him maybe, but the whole point is to say underneath him, for the first phase anyway.
The camera is a problem in that fight, period.
@@thatguybis1997 "The camera is a problem in that fight, period."
No, no it isn't. In between being able to look up and the audio cues, there is actually no problem at all.
Coming at the obviously very inebirated and hyperbolic acting man with the faux-exasperated "bro you're acting goofy" type stuff makes you seem honestly just even more petty and annoying than bro in the video. I'm not gonna sit here and slob you for "responding in such a good way!" that many of the comments here seem to be, and I'm sorry but a lot of your ER material is either straight up wrong, or just misinfo. Not trynna hate, just speak truth here, there seems like a big hug box here in the comments and i felt compelled to say something + being buzzed made this funny. ☮
I forgot this video even existed.
FS fanboys malding
BOOM roasted!
BOOM
Drunk streamer complaining about rambling lmao
Your...not friends with under the mayo?
You guys give off the same vibe.
Edited: 19:48 so do you really not know or are you hand waving it away by making a joke?
He's wondering why you like taking a long time looking for the host in ds3 but hate taking a long time looking for the host in elden ring.
Instead of saying it's quicker so it feels better you said something that made it seems like you like taking a while to find other player.
I honestly still don't know what he said. I prefer searching for the host rather than being told where they are, end of story.
@@thatguybis1997 oh ... You like how long it takes to find players in elden ring.
Mk. Got confused at some point.
Sounded like you hate how long it takes.
Edited:I mean hate. Gosh.
@@thatguybis1997 elden ring is massive so wouldn't searching for the host be bad?
@@parsap9587 In the case of Elden Ring, yeah. Just goes to show why the multiplayer doesn't work well in this game.
ER is more engaging than DS3 in pretty much every way, including pvp. Just admit you want ER to be a reskin of DS3. It's fine if you do but I don't think it would be nearly as good. Also, lupine pretty much took down all of your points.
In regards to PVP, I couldn’t disagree more.
In what ways do you consider it more engaging?
It's the same formula since 2009 (13 years) it's just the same mechanics just open world and throw ramdom bosses all around... Naa not a Master Piece.
@@thatguybis1997 Dark Souls 3 PVP is all about abusing a lot of glitches that the games has. But if you take those out of the equation, DS3 pvp is not as engaging as ER, most of the things that you can do in DS3 can be done in ER and it's way better.
Straight Swords don't feel as bullshit now because the range is good and it doesn't blow half HP bar of your opponent away, backstabs feel so much better to execute, Ultras don't get shit on, magic/miracles are actually fun to use, powerstancing is back, and jumping attacks/dodges, variety of AoW to use with different build and weapons, etc. Makes me like ER more now (patch 1.07)
edit: Some spelling errors, english is not my main language.
@@nikvett everything you said is that for the average PvPer? or does that mainly exist for people really omitted to PvP?
@@weirdo3116 pretty much every single PvPer in DS3 knows about estus cancel, backstab fishing with rapiers, has a dark/chaos build or uses a straight/curved sword...
ｐｒｏｍｏｓｍ
The problem with disliking his approach to your videos can be applied to how you approached the response you got from others about your radahn boss review,
You chose to make another video about a patch that then later got reverted after the video was made, in an attempt to clown on the people for finding your video incredibly flawed
Sure, but there’s a difference between making a joke, and being an asshole just because you disagree with someone.
I still find that video funny to this day, even though the patch got reverted, and even though I admit that the Radahn video wasn’t one of my greatest moments.
Like, if the patch hadn’t got reverted, would you be telling me that it was an improper response?
Either way, it wasn’t meant to be taken seriously.
Nah bro your criticisms are bad. It’s bad to the point where your advice is harmful to new players. You’re bad for the community man.
Profile name checks out
@@thatguybis1997 Calling radahn unpredictable is just straight up fucking wrong, you aren’t right about everything
@@lazguy6936ah he's right you have to have insane reflexes for a lot of enemies I mean fking insane luipine even says he almost gets caught of guard by some of his attacks during radahn and I'd like to see your flow chart when godskin apostle does his double right swipe cuz I highly doubt your dodging that shit. Luipine says himself it's laughable to try predict a boss. Him being generic aside he's right I don't know what your on about maybe you mean undodgable
I watched both videos and honestly both of yall are wrong. And that's okay. I don't think this is a game for you.
And you're a 🤡, but hey that's "okay". 😂
but he is right
About a few things. Not everything 😂
@@thatguybis1997 you are so cool! You are right about everything you say! Being stubborn and acting smug is so awesome!
@@lazguy6936 when did he give you that impression? I didn't pay to close attention to both of their points but what I do know is that the streamer was acting so childish and obnoxious that I got a headache from watching him. I thought the youtube guy was irritating enough with his reactions although that is somewhat justified by the length the other guy went to insult him. If you're comment should be directed at anyone then it shoul be the streaming...
Not sure who’s in the right.
The obnoxious guy is belligerently giving you crap but you also make some pretty bad points in your original vid. So it’s somewhat not surprising that someone mocked you to the extent that he did.