How to Properly Test Car Catalyst Using a Handheld XRF Analyzer

Learn how to properly test car catalyst using a handheld XRF analyzer. Expert Mazen Abbas from Dubai will discuss equipment, sample prep, and testing and share the three main elements that can impact test accuracy.

[@rogerjohnston5361]

What is the film specs you are using

[@Igor-oh3ql]

You say "for accurate sample analysis". What is the accuracy of the analysis in numbers?

[@djennanenacereddine2055]

عندي XRF200 SCIaps لا يشتغل و بضهر رقم العطب (-4)

[@user-jd8zm2yw2i]

Please how can i get one?

[@moeabuh2003]

what is the grinder you are using?

[@jelimatsco.limited3569]

How much is the product?

[@Igor-oh3ql]

1. The type of grinding indicated in the video is not suitable for preparing a homogeneous sample.
2. I do not agree with the statement that there will be an incorrect analysis due to the non-use of laboratory film. We tested samples for each of which there were ICP analyses
The error of the device is ten times greater than the error introduced by ordinary food film. On some samples of soot filters, the device was wrong by even 40% (Vanta C), on samples with a palladium content of 11000-22000 ppm, the Vanta L device simply does not work normally. The underestimation of the metal content was systematically within 14-28%.

[@David-sw3on]

Ok No disrespect, but this is not the only vid I have come across in another language; so it would be nice and truly considerate!.. if TH-cam provided a notice that stated when a video contains another language! Therefore we Non- multilingual people would not waste our Flippin time(especially mine lol) logging into an ENGLISH VIDEO TITLE!!! (Form of clickbait) PS.. and I bet this was a good vid too.😪 👍😉🇨🇦

[@Igor-oh3ql]

Вы говорите "для точного анализа образца". Какова точность анализа в цифрах?
1. Тип измельчения указанного в видео не подходит для подготовки однородного образца.
2. Не согласен с утверждением, что из-за неиспользования лаболаторной пленки будет неправильный анализ. Мы проводили тестирование образцов на каждый из которых были анализы ICP.
Погрешность прибора в десятки раз больше погрешности, которую вносит обычная пищевая пленка. На некоторых образцах сажевых фильтров прибор ошибался даже на 40% (Vanta C), на образцах в которых содержание палладия 11-22000 ппм прибор Vanta L просто не работает нормально. Занижение содержания металлов систематически было в рамках 14-28%. На образцах в диапазоне 200-600 ппм платины прибор производил постоянное завышение на 15-30%.