200 percent correct. Federer was,is and will be the best tennis player not only in this planet but any planet of so many universes. He will always ever be called MR. TENNIS of any planet
13:10 - d attitude of Hewitt while d gr8 Bud Collins (rip) is introducing him; speak 4 itself it's kinda "no matter how hard I've been trying, 4 me no way".
@@supermovietimebros6770 Again, faster courts back then. You have to be more precise. Now, everything has been slowed. Courts are now homogenous. Even grass at Wimbledon are like clay courts nowadays.
@@Riri-oj1zs the courts aren’t THAT different to account for everyone missing so much except Federer in the 2000’s. Nadal was hitting with him just fine on the 08 Wimbledon court
Hewitt was cocky against other players. He had humiliating behaviors, he had racist behaviors, he had insulting behaviors and so on and so forth. However when he played against Federer, there was no scream, no cocky behavior. Federer thought this second class player how to be humble, how to behave on court.
Maybe if courts stayed fast, but unfortunately he was stubborn to change (racket and backhand) until it was too late (2017). Definitely greatest pure tennis player ever though.
@@tariqjoseph3562 he changed racket in 2014. Tested it in Gstaad and Hamburg in 2013 but ended the season with the pro staff 90. Then he permanently chose the 97 just before the AO. But I agree he should've changed racket earlier, probably by the end of 2008. He would've been way more successful.
@@魚-c3d yeah it all goes back to the point, that the courts and balls changed against him, while Djokovic and Nadal (even Murray) thrived. Must’ve been tough having such a genius game built for fast courts and balls and then have to except the game happened to change dramatically during your peak. Hard to make such big changes during your prime, but you saw what could have been in AO ‘17 if he did make those changes earlier. Still, that’s the way the game went and he still have a great career and at least it evened the playing field more. Would have been boring having an op federer dominating for 20 yrs, shame he nerfed himself for so long though.
fast courts..haha Mr fed got trashed on fast surfaces like shanghai cincinnati halle... fed himself admits these courts are faster but good players win everywhere.. joker beat fed on grass and Nadal at rg.. nocheap excuses like slow or fast Court, old age... Hehe #excuser
Hewitt's shots were so weak. 2002 was such a poor year for tennis hence why he got to world number 1. He didn't stand a chance when the top 3 and Murray emerged 5/6 years later
Counterpuncher base-liner man, he was criptonite to all the serve and volley style players of the 90s coming in the 2000s. Being a counterpuncher means he uses the opponents power on the ball to counter, he might not have had power himself, but he had one of the finest footwork and tenacity back then. More than decent vollier, great lob shots. In his prime was great to watch.
@@jamesfraser1622 Beat Juan Carlo Ferrero in this very final in 5 sets. Beat most players. That's why he made 4 slam finals and world #1 for 18 months. Beat Nadal in the AO 4'th round. A couple of examples.
Request match, without mp due to cr.
A hard one. Coria-Federer ATP Finals 2005
@@sebasortega95 Match noted.
th-cam.com/video/B061oshTbXg/w-d-xo.html
Federer best tennis player of all the times
200 percent correct. Federer was,is and will be the best tennis player not only in this planet but any planet of so many universes. He will always ever be called MR. TENNIS of any planet
Love how fast the courts were back in the day.
Houston wasn’t that fast, though.
Fed's cross court forehand, man it's like it doesn't exist now. The forehand was ridiculously good. Unreal precision.
He was never the same after mononucleosis. He had to rely more on his variety compared to raw power and skills pre-mono days.
Roger was so cool 😎 at all times. Really fun to watch these replays.
So good, roger is goat courts were faster all skill invovled
@@Milanche87 nori,e roger crushed Novak and Nadal on surfaces not clay. Novak is overrated.
@@Aaron-fj1hl lol don’t make me laugh
@@Milanche87 negative on slowed down high bouncing grass.
@@Milanche87 I love how every djokotard answers the same thing. All equally retarded. Why do you want me to cry when I'm just spitting facts 🤣🤣
@@nocturne87 Djokovic probably had the hardest and I say this as a Federer fan...
Federer just too skillful and powerful here.
Sir Roger federer golden legend in universal love you so much ❤❤❤
This is great, thanks! Would love to see the whole match though. :(
You're welcome! :)
I think no longer have it but i will check.
mega.nz/file/9UEXSK5J#T1NTq3gRYCyoG4uj8HZTlZCvVD-WZvhxhVvHnn9Gu8k ;)
Two legend's ❤❤❤
Federer was a cheat code back then
Beautiful.
13:10 - d attitude of Hewitt while d gr8 Bud Collins (rip) is introducing him; speak 4 itself it's kinda "no matter how hard I've been trying, 4 me no way".
Good stuff! Thx
You're welcome!
Grazie mille! Come al solito il migliore! È l'unica finale che mi manca, hai per caso ancora il match integrale? Grazie comunque!!
Troppo buono... :)
Credo di no, ma controllerò.
Lo avevo ancora. ;)
mega.nz/file/9UEXSK5J#T1NTq3gRYCyoG4uj8HZTlZCvVD-WZvhxhVvHnn9Gu8k
@@peRFecttennis Grandissimo!!! Grazie mille!!!
Can u upload the RR match vs moya?
I add to requests. ;)
Why did everyone except Federer miss so damn much in the 2000’s?! Nowadays nobody misses ever
Faster courts back then
@@georget6078 it’s still soooo many unforced errors compared to now
@@supermovietimebros6770
Again, faster courts back then. You have to be more precise. Now, everything has been slowed. Courts are now homogenous. Even grass at Wimbledon are like clay courts nowadays.
@@Riri-oj1zs the courts aren’t THAT different to account for everyone missing so much except Federer in the 2000’s. Nadal was hitting with him just fine on the 08 Wimbledon court
@@supermovietimebros6770
2008 Wimbledon is a bad example to mention with fast grass courts. It was incredibly slowed down.
why is this only a bo3 sets final?
I'm not sure, but I think they made it best of 3 to try and finish the tournament on the right day. There was a lot of rain that week.
Hewitt running at 100% of ability, Federer running in eco mode at 60% if that.
Hewitt was cocky against other players. He had humiliating behaviors, he had racist behaviors, he had insulting behaviors and so on and so forth. However when he played against Federer, there was no scream, no cocky behavior. Federer thought this second class player how to be humble, how to behave on court.
bad matchup 4 Hewitt: great retriever, but lacked the power 2 hurt Fed. Fed was always dictating, either with serve or forehand, or both
Love how fast the courts were back in the day.
Decoturf: grade 3, medium speed
Roger is the Greatest of All Time!
@bakinek I see tennis, not stats or numbers.
Maybe if courts stayed fast, but unfortunately he was stubborn to change (racket and backhand) until it was too late (2017). Definitely greatest pure tennis player ever though.
@bakinek nadal has more GS and more clay tournaments but less grass and hard court wins and never won tour finals at the end of the year.
@@tariqjoseph3562 he changed racket in 2014. Tested it in Gstaad and Hamburg in 2013 but ended the season with the pro staff 90. Then he permanently chose the 97 just before the AO.
But I agree he should've changed racket earlier, probably by the end of 2008. He would've been way more successful.
@@魚-c3d yeah it all goes back to the point, that the courts and balls changed against him, while Djokovic and Nadal (even Murray) thrived. Must’ve been tough having such a genius game built for fast courts and balls and then have to except the game happened to change dramatically during your peak. Hard to make such big changes during your prime, but you saw what could have been in AO ‘17 if he did make those changes earlier. Still, that’s the way the game went and he still have a great career and at least it evened the playing field more. Would have been boring having an op federer dominating for 20 yrs, shame he nerfed himself for so long though.
I just have to say Brad Gilbert would have been much more entertaining as no 1 than Hewitt.
fed was just a particularly bad matchup for hewitt cuz he was better than hewitt in every way. just had no advantage to press.
👏👏👏👍🔥
fast courts..haha
Mr fed got trashed on fast surfaces like shanghai cincinnati halle...
fed himself admits these courts are faster but good players win everywhere..
joker beat fed on grass and Nadal at rg..
nocheap excuses like slow or fast Court, old age...
Hehe #excuser
Hmm, no Fed won Cincinnati 7 times and Djokovic 2 times and not until 2018... Guess you only watched one of the matches.
@@topspin4hand
Dude in his culmination days just before retirement, fed used to say he's good on fast surfaces and grass.
Alas he lost...
He's a goner
Hewitt's shots were so weak. 2002 was such a poor year for tennis hence why he got to world number 1. He didn't stand a chance when the top 3 and Murray emerged 5/6 years later
Ignorance at its finest
Counterpuncher base-liner man, he was criptonite to all the serve and volley style players of the 90s coming in the 2000s. Being a counterpuncher means he uses the opponents power on the ball to counter, he might not have had power himself, but he had one of the finest footwork and tenacity back then. More than decent vollier, great lob shots. In his prime was great to watch.
@@isaacflorez4820 😂 yeah, he was brilliant against baseliners wasn’t he? Ate them for breakfast
@@jamesfraser1622 Beat Juan Carlo Ferrero in this very final in 5 sets. Beat most players. That's why he made 4 slam finals and world #1 for 18 months. Beat Nadal in the AO 4'th round. A couple of examples.
Hewitt is so much worse than Djokovic Nadal. This is a joke
Hewith have 2 major titles actually
Stop comparing big 3 players with Hewitt