Network Switching Overview - N10-008 CompTIA Network+ : 2.3

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @daelightmoon
    @daelightmoon ปีที่แล้ว +10

    When you described flooding for an unknown MAC address, I thought "hey! that's like when a hub is directing traffic on a half duplex network!" and then you confirmed it immediately after. You taught me both things! Thank you so much. :)

  • @buncle2
    @buncle2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I just want to jump in to say I really enjoyed the use of the SG1 team - one of my favourite tv shows!

    • @cgme9535
      @cgme9535 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm just starting to watch it because of his references. It is good so far.

    • @Websta114
      @Websta114 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope you checked out SG:Atlantis and SG:Universe after that :D@@cgme9535

  • @426SuperBird
    @426SuperBird 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Thanks!

    • @professormesser
      @professormesser  2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Wow! Thanks for the support, and good studies!

    • @426SuperBird
      @426SuperBird 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@professormesser You're certainly welcome. My "Thanks!" is for the totality of your tutorial efforts, both here and on your website. Such fantastic resources - keep up the great work!

  • @handlesaretoopersonal
    @handlesaretoopersonal ปีที่แล้ว +17

    So a switch is like a piano and when you don't know where traffics going it's like the switch smacks all the keys and hopes it works, and if the switch does know the next note it just presses the right key

    • @jackr2287
      @jackr2287 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That is actually a good way to explain it.

    • @rickraydubs
      @rickraydubs ปีที่แล้ว +8

      interesting analogy, musician approved 🤣

    • @CH-nb3nz
      @CH-nb3nz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@rickraydubsyes indeed. Pianist approved 👋🏻

  • @kishawnlewis4635
    @kishawnlewis4635 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    is it possible to do a reverse ARP, in order to receive an IP address based on a MAC address?

    • @professormesser
      @professormesser  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      We no longer use RARP for IP addressing, given the nearly ubiquitous use of DHCP.

  • @Hiwot95
    @Hiwot95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Awesome Video! Thank you Professor

  • @honeybadgerisme
    @honeybadgerisme ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤For the SGC!!

  • @Mourning666
    @Mourning666 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the stargate reference!

  • @khaledbuffet467
    @khaledbuffet467 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    SLAAC uses EUI -64 to create its own address right ?

  • @xFlow777
    @xFlow777 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    for the ethernet frame destination mac address, who's mac address is it exactly if the traffic is going to a different subnet? Is it the Mac address of the default gateway router (the first hop) or is the mac address of the actual device that this traffic is being sent to? If it is the actual recipient's mac then how would a switch know anything about mac address that's on a different subnet or out on the internet even?

    • @iSgapetti
      @iSgapetti ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re basically describing the process of “Routing”.
      But yes, the destination MAC is going to be that of the router.

    • @xFlow777
      @xFlow777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @iSgapetti so it's routers Mac address not workstations Mac address that this traffic was intended for?

    • @iSgapetti
      @iSgapetti ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@xFlow777 Yes. There's no way a device will know the MAC address of a device that is in a different network/subnet. This is where routing comes in.
      So once the frame arrives at the router, the router changes the source MAC address to itself (router's MAC) and then changes the destination MAC address to that of the device based on the ARP table in the router.
      The router will then forward this frame to the switch, the switch will know what interface the device is connected to based on the destination MAC address.
      MAC addresses (layer 2 in general) will always be hop-to-hop.

  • @Chunda8
    @Chunda8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Professor, thanks for putting this up. I am in the middle of a very challenging selection process for an elite bootcamp and am preparing for it with your videos. I also feel well prepared for the Net+ exam, you are a great resource. One interesting question I have about PoE. If the cable itself is originally designed to carry data, isn't sending power over it a much higher load? How much is the difference and wouldn't this need a slightly heavier gauge of wire? Also, wouldn't the current flow cause interference or problems with data flow on the other wires in the cable? Not urgent, thanks for any input you have. Since there is a standard for it, I'm probably worried over nothing and it won't catch fire, but you can understand my concern of course.

  • @johnfernald-t9y
    @johnfernald-t9y ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A bit of a random question, but could someone cause a DOS by repeatedly contacting a non-existent MAC, forcing the switch to continuously flood the LAN with that traffic?

    • @DamCrooksta
      @DamCrooksta ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes, this is called LAN flooding. The switch starts broadcasting incoming frames to all ports. This can lead to a significant increase in network traffic, causing congestion, slowdowns, and potentially network outages.The increased traffic and network congestion resulting from the switch flooding the LAN can effectively deny normal network operations, causing a DoS condition for legitimate users. You learn how to secure a network against these types of attacks in Security+.

    • @daelightmoon
      @daelightmoon ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@DamCrooksta Sweet! Makes me excited to move into Sec+ after this...

  • @mbreed8960
    @mbreed8960 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You know, I wasted 5 minutes trying to find out what SGC was.