I think both of you nailed it. VR is a slow roll technology and I don't think this headset will be any different. Sure, when they unveil it, it will be sensational, but I agree this first version is for the developers. It makes sense to have the dev community foot the $3k for dev kits and by the time the consumer ready version comes out, there will be a ton of content for it. So, I believe WWDC is the perfect place to unveil the headset, even if they don't actually show it.
I'm always excited for the OS updates. I'm a little concerned about the price tag of the headset given the economic conditions and the fact that it's a first gen device. Remembering Series 0 $10k gold Apple Watches which became impotent a few years after release.
from what I've heard. the apple vr headset is going to be sold at a Loss at even $3000. they are more making iti so developers can get in early.....so when a cheaper version is released a year or 2 later, there will already be apps
Did you guys forget about the Developer Transition Kits? Both were done at WWDC. Essentially the world was introduced to M1 (for the latest kit anyway) and devs were given a working platform (a repurposed Mac Mini). This wasn't a version one or a consumer product. So. Could be the same deal. We also see this happen in video games with consoles.. though with much secrecy.. for reasons..
I love VR and am excited to see what they are doing but is it the right time considering the bigger hype around LLM’s? Where’s there ChatGPT, BING or Bard? Could they release something like that at their WWDC? Or would they wait to release a new version of Siri until it is ready for a wider release?
I don't think Apple would compete in the LLM area with Siri, as an empirical example Siri frequently just answer with "I don't understand", or "Please open Safari and search this"... I mean I think the ML model wasn't heavily trained like others did
There was news which said that Apple was working on making AR apps just by using Siri. Anyone without any coding knowledge can build an AR app by using Siri. That is next level. Generative AI will eventually help in AR and VR content generation, which was a huge barrier till now because it would take hours and days to create 3D assets. There are already examples in the market which helps you create 3D worlds and assets just via a text input.
The software updates apple is making this year are not going to be huge, it’s one of those incremental years where they focus on performance and stability. It should leave them with a big chunk of showtime to talk about their headset. I just hope we get to see another “one more thing…” at the end of the software part of the event.
what they are giving devs will not be the consumer product. the end goal is XR capable glasses. this is a dev tool so there are a ton of apps on launch in a couple years
Having try Quest 2 and just bought PSVR 2 Apple must have at launch will be 1. fully running MAC OS on it 2. Apple Fitness workouts for it 3. Apple Music concerts for it 4. Apple TV plus/sports content for 5. Gaming for it is obvious but it needs to be serious about it, buy gaming studios to make exclusive games for it 6.
I believe it will not replace any device for years, but initially be an extension of your iPhone, Mac, iPad and Apple TV and that you can do exactly the same things as you can do with those devices. Because why do you think they are putting such powerful chips in phones, iPads and macs lately? To power the headset. I expect you can do do office work, browse the internet, make calls, watch movies, project items in your office or room, interact with apps and such. The huge advantage that Apple has versus the other headset manufacturers is their eco system which will be a HUGE advantage which give Apple a major headstart in useful functionality compared to others. The eco system is already there, plus the existing devices are getting upgraded with powerful M chips to be able to power it, wirelessly or via a cable. So the most difficult is to make it light, comfortable, that is has a very sharp display and that it works easy. Maybe they will, but I do not see why they would make it an independent device, right from the beginning. But who knows…
There is nothing to get excited about with this. Apple has come to realize that this is far more complicated than even they expected it to be. Without a major earth-shaking announcement and product demonstration, this will be a nothing burger.
Based on my observation it will contain some innovative feature pertaining to the sound related to AR as apple hiring posts were specifically in this domain in the past 2 years.
You don't know much about VR on this channel do you? It's old news in the VR news world this headset will be a very limited release for Apple. Not many being produced at all As they know very few will buy it at this high price point. Something like one per Apple store. There's a cut down cheaper one following it later.
There would be a street version and a chunky home version. The lightweight street version would use iPhone computing power. The home build integrates computing power. It would utilize their services and utility they already have in place and extend existing functionality.
People said the same thing about Apple 4k tv set and Apple Car (electric vehicle). We are still waiting for Apple to announce and release the products.
The memoji must be part of the vr headset. I hope they have live translations when using this, like when speaking to a person with foreign language there will be translation subtitles under just like watching movies.
Us PSVR users were wondering the same thing about PSVR2. Why didn’t it get its own stage to introduce it. Instead just blog posts and CES for 3 minutes.
It goes without saying that when Apple finally does roll out their AR/VR/MR device it will have powerful creation tools. I am a PC human, but I respect the devices and software. I forsee MR versions of their entire suite of creation based software. I also think that haptics will be next level. If you are drawing or sculpting on a screen essentially, haptics really raise the bar in a big way.
I think the approach of current VR is kind of short-sighted, where they advertise the draw of enterprise VR as being able to use these huge floating computer screens. But that doesn't really offer a huge advantage over just using a monitor. Somebody needs to come up with a computer OS with a 3D interface rather than two, to fully take advantage of the VR experience. If Apple wants to really push the field, they need to do something like that.
True. One of the Apple experts said that the MR headset launch will be mostly a "Macintosh moment" rather than another iPhone moment. If this device is marketed as a powerful tool that enables people to create new experiences rather than just consume, people will buy it. Imagine if the headset makes it super easy to make your own animated 3D movies, suddenly everybody will have a story to tell. Buying the headset will be more desirable. Just like it is happening with generative AI. Any one can create a painting now with just text inputs.
For $3,000 I would need to be sold on controllers and headset both being fantastic upgrades / differentiators over what Meta Quest, PCVR and PSVR2 currently offer.
Unless it is a true desktop display replacement (AR, but VR optional) that I can use all day, I'm not interested. That's the killer use-case. I don't see people walking down the street anytime soon strapped with a headset.
I think if Apple can make a headset that has at least 150° FOV as my old oculus quest 2’s field of vision was terrible, the graphics also need to improve by a huge margin to what they are today
This is literally what apple is going to use as a base line for the presentation. These guys got hired to put this out to prep the people and organize the presentation.
Maybe the headset has to be heavily integrated into mac OS and IOs. So they might show the headset and also how the new OS versions work together with it.
I’m more of a feature and content + software kind of guy, and but if I’m bedazzled by the surprise that we call “One More Thing” at Apple WWDC and they do launch the beta RealityOS and the headset for developers and partners then I’m keen to know where it will go, how will second generation ROS will look like and if the design of the headset would be any different will there be a merger with a triple AAA games company under Apple Arcade trademark, who knows, if it costs $3,000 and only for North America there goes my hope.
if we are equating it to the iphone launch i wonder what basic feature will be missing in VR.. we know meta didnt have legs.. whats apples cut/copy/paste vr equivalent :p
It's not gonna cost $3k. More likely it will cost $1799 - 2199. Many will say it's not that bad but I think apple will struggle after the initial release.
If the headset is anything like the NReal Air but clear like normal glasses, and completely wireless with a 10 hour or more battery, then they got my money.
Nah, it has to be glasses to become mainstream. Headsets are probably niche, can't overcome VR sickness from PSVR2 for the past few weeks. $300, maybe I'll buy.
I’d like the idea of a mixed reality headset but, I think it’s a bad idea to announce it at WWDC, because I think it should have its own event,without having to share the spotlight with software like WatchOS, iOS, TVOS & MacOS (ALSO)…since everything is getting so expensive… Here’s a idea maybe Apple should hold off until the economy and inflation rates goes back down
I do have faith that if ANYONE can crack this platform, it's Apple. But I really hope they don't fall into the enterprise trap and lock it behind insane pricing and limited content.
There are to many vr headsets out there but what we need is triple a big vr games that no brand is focused on currently. Sony might be only one doing so going forward
I have huge doubts, after spending some time with the so called best VR Headset for the moment, the PSVR2, I still think it is way to far out for this product category to be prime time ready. People still get vertigo and all kinds of things from VR. Even if chips like m2 get faster and faster, 2x 4K @120 fps screens for VR are still impossible to delivery to. Additionally they really would need a killer app, and so many people already tried and failed to deliver that, including FB, HTC etc.
Apple do need to get this right if they are launching this VR product and questionable timing of this product coming out as well. If they can create an environment that is a customizable and interactive like quest 2 but they can add their apple products to this! Apple TV theater, virtual workout spaces! Come on!!!!!
I own the Vive XR Elite got it day one and the setup took sometime but the hand tracking is another level all together vs Meta Quest 2 the only other headset I own that has hand tracking. I also own HTC Vive Pro 2 and HP Reverb G2. I think what Apple going to do is similar to Meta and HTC with video passthrough vs magic leap optic stuff. The reason the technology is no where near ready as seen by magic leap issues with object transparency and difficulty with light levels and cost. Meta Quest Pro uses local dimming vs OLED and is able to compensate somewhat for lack of no OLED. Vive XR Elite still uses LED and is somewhat effected by lack of true black but it's video passthrough and hand tracking is completely at another level. I think Apple looking to bring to market a lower cost XR headset using technology brought over by Sony and their PSVR 2 headset. It has OLED and has amazing head tracking as well as higher resolution micro OLED then the LED inside of ether Meta Quest Pro and HTC Vive XR Elite. If they combine their technology with AR and camara technology with Sony micro-OLED displays from PSVR 2 at a 1000 to 1500 dollar price point with some form of iPhone integration it will be a pretty big deal especially with rumors of them working with Steam for gaming. I have a feeling these are the reasons why steam has not introduced a replacement yet for Steam Valve Index because they are waiting for Sony or LG to ramp up production of their OLED.
What? Bridget was literally critiquing Apple within the first minute of the video. Tell me you only reacted to the title without telling me, reactionary loser.
I believe Apple has pushed their "we come a few years after everyone but make it better" strategy a bit too far. Every other company has already tried this before, it didn't work (I mean, there are products, but they are not a must), and it is not a new concept, as VR headsets already existed in the 1980's... Even Meta, that tried to push the "Metaverse" concept very hard, is moving on to conversational AI, which is the new thing everyone want to jump to right now.
VR enthusiasts like me have usually invested a lot of time and money in VR. And what already exists will be further developed by AIs at breakneck speed. I will defnitly not start anew with VR. If Apple manages to integrate generative AIs that can be controlled by voice commands in VR, this could be exciting. Otherwise, I predict a niche product for the followers of the Holy Apple Church
We all know it’s not going to be perfect, things won’t work well, there’ll be a software update and it’ll fix things but it’ll be months after launch like all their other products.
for 3K it's dead in the water. PSVR2+PS5 costs a third of that. PSVR2 has a killer app, Horizon VR, as well as a bunch more coming. I use a gaming PC and a quest, and the total combined cost is under 2 grand. Half life Alyx and VR chat are the killer apps. VR for stuff other then gaming is not fully fleshed out yet.
I love how you always meet Scott in a park like you’re both Cold War era spies lol
I hope they keep doing it
I think both of you nailed it. VR is a slow roll technology and I don't think this headset will be any different. Sure, when they unveil it, it will be sensational, but I agree this first version is for the developers. It makes sense to have the dev community foot the $3k for dev kits and by the time the consumer ready version comes out, there will be a ton of content for it. So, I believe WWDC is the perfect place to unveil the headset, even if they don't actually show it.
Big Bridget fan…Daily Show level presentation style and hilarity. She would fit right in
Also I love Bridget’s quirkiness and enthusiasm!
I'm always excited for the OS updates. I'm a little concerned about the price tag of the headset given the economic conditions and the fact that it's a first gen device. Remembering Series 0 $10k gold Apple Watches which became impotent a few years after release.
from what I've heard. the apple vr headset is going to be sold at a Loss at even $3000. they are more making iti so developers can get in early.....so when a cheaper version is released a year or 2 later, there will already be apps
That was Willy Wonka!!!
Did you guys forget about the Developer Transition Kits? Both were done at WWDC. Essentially the world was introduced to M1 (for the latest kit anyway) and devs were given a working platform (a repurposed Mac Mini). This wasn't a version one or a consumer product. So. Could be the same deal. We also see this happen in video games with consoles.. though with much secrecy.. for reasons..
I love VR and am excited to see what they are doing but is it the right time considering the bigger hype around LLM’s? Where’s there ChatGPT, BING or Bard? Could they release something like that at their WWDC? Or would they wait to release a new version of Siri until it is ready for a wider release?
Be funny if the final part of the vr reveal is a Siri that acts like Tony Stark’s J.A.R.V.I.S. and that transitions into the new Siri.
I don't think Apple would compete in the LLM area with Siri, as an empirical example Siri frequently just answer with "I don't understand", or "Please open Safari and search this"... I mean I think the ML model wasn't heavily trained like others did
There was news which said that Apple was working on making AR apps just by using Siri. Anyone without any coding knowledge can build an AR app by using Siri. That is next level. Generative AI will eventually help in AR and VR content generation, which was a huge barrier till now because it would take hours and days to create 3D assets. There are already examples in the market which helps you create 3D worlds and assets just via a text input.
Bridget can make anything seem wonderful..
The software updates apple is making this year are not going to be huge, it’s one of those incremental years where they focus on performance and stability. It should leave them with a big chunk of showtime to talk about their headset. I just hope we get to see another “one more thing…” at the end of the software part of the event.
i feel like this lady should be an actor
Bridget you are really fun to watch! Great content as always.. Greetings from the other end of the world!
Bring it on! My work may be moving to 2 a week in office soon and adding low cube walls. I need something like this to keep my sanity.
Ima wait and see type. Most likely buying the quest 3 when it comes out, but I want to see where Apple takes the industry.
what they are giving devs will not be the consumer product. the end goal is XR capable glasses. this is a dev tool so there are a ton of apps on launch in a couple years
Having try Quest 2 and just bought PSVR 2
Apple must have at launch will be
1. fully running MAC OS on it
2. Apple Fitness workouts for it
3. Apple Music concerts for it
4. Apple TV plus/sports content for
5. Gaming for it is obvious but it needs to be serious about it, buy gaming studios to make exclusive games for it
6.
I believe it will not replace any device for years, but initially be an extension of your iPhone, Mac, iPad and Apple TV and that you can do exactly the same things as you can do with those devices. Because why do you think they are putting such powerful chips in phones, iPads and macs lately? To power the headset. I expect you can do do office work, browse the internet, make calls, watch movies, project items in your office or room, interact with apps and such. The huge advantage that Apple has versus the other headset manufacturers is their eco system which will be a HUGE advantage which give Apple a major headstart in useful functionality compared to others. The eco system is already there, plus the existing devices are getting upgraded with powerful M chips to be able to power it, wirelessly or via a cable. So the most difficult is to make it light, comfortable, that is has a very sharp display and that it works easy. Maybe they will, but I do not see why they would make it an independent device, right from the beginning. But who knows…
It won’t replace until the 2030s or 2040s
Smart phone is popular for a reason: its portable. Who would wear a gaggle in 104F summer?
There is nothing to get excited about with this. Apple has come to realize that this is far more complicated than even they expected it to be. Without a major earth-shaking announcement and product demonstration, this will be a nothing burger.
Can’t Wait I Hope It Does Well 👍🏾
Im concerned about everyone being expected to own the headset that costs 3 grand.
If it supports steam VR I will get it 😃
@@x32i77 it won’t have controllers
@@lunarift I hope you can use lighthouse controllers somehow.
You could use index Controllers with HP reverb G2 hmd after all 😃☝️
@@x32i77 you know Apple they hate all other companies
It is probably intended for development not consumers.
love this video and the dynamic with the two
Lol that look @ 1:29 - priceless 😂
Make this lady do more videos. I think she's cool.
I love watching this midwestern neighborly maternal figure report with actual technical fidelity and humor.
Based on my observation it will contain some innovative feature pertaining to the sound related to AR as apple hiring posts were specifically in this domain in the past 2 years.
You don't know much about VR on this channel do you? It's old news in the VR news world this headset will be a very limited release for Apple. Not many being produced at all As they know very few will buy it at this high price point. Something like one per Apple store. There's a cut down cheaper one following it later.
You giving off a real 90s vibe…in a good way, like you should be on full house lol
I might be interested in a headset if it's open-source, like Linux. Or, is there such a headset already?
There would be a street version and a chunky home version.
The lightweight street version would use iPhone computing power.
The home build integrates computing power.
It would utilize their services and utility they already have in place and extend existing functionality.
hahah the loved magic trick! instant like for this video :D
People said the same thing about Apple 4k tv set and Apple Car (electric vehicle).
We are still waiting for Apple to announce and release the products.
i hope it’s a one more thing situation, been far too long since we’ve had one
The memoji must be part of the vr headset. I hope they have live translations when using this, like when speaking to a person with foreign language there will be translation subtitles under just like watching movies.
I like the fun Babes In Toyland outfit. Suits her personality.
Whyyyyyyyyyy I've been waiting for the Apple AR glasses for sooo longggg. Why VR, there's so many standalone ones already..
Us PSVR users were wondering the same thing about PSVR2. Why didn’t it get its own stage to introduce it. Instead just blog posts and CES for 3 minutes.
I hope its smart glasses that look like regular glasses
Everyone is 100% on board this rumor. It's been a decade now and it's always coming out this year.
Off-topic Bridget reminds me of Carrie Fisher, just saying 😉
They are showing the sdk prototypes at wwdc first programming software!
It goes without saying that when Apple finally does roll out their AR/VR/MR device it will have powerful creation tools. I am a PC human, but I respect the devices and software. I forsee MR versions of their entire suite of creation based software. I also think that haptics will be next level. If you are drawing or sculpting on a screen essentially, haptics really raise the bar in a big way.
I think the approach of current VR is kind of short-sighted, where they advertise the draw of enterprise VR as being able to use these huge floating computer screens. But that doesn't really offer a huge advantage over just using a monitor. Somebody needs to come up with a computer OS with a 3D interface rather than two, to fully take advantage of the VR experience. If Apple wants to really push the field, they need to do something like that.
True. One of the Apple experts said that the MR headset launch will be mostly a "Macintosh moment" rather than another iPhone moment. If this device is marketed as a powerful tool that enables people to create new experiences rather than just consume, people will buy it. Imagine if the headset makes it super easy to make your own animated 3D movies, suddenly everybody will have a story to tell. Buying the headset will be more desirable. Just like it is happening with generative AI. Any one can create a painting now with just text inputs.
For $3,000 I would need to be sold on controllers and headset both being fantastic upgrades / differentiators over what Meta Quest, PCVR and PSVR2 currently offer.
$3k is a tone def price.
Unless it is a true desktop display replacement (AR, but VR optional) that I can use all day, I'm not interested. That's the killer use-case. I don't see people walking down the street anytime soon strapped with a headset.
SteamVR compability for steam vr library and to fully use M1/M2 CPU/GPU power
Im exited for more AR becoming mainstream but since it really hasnt and its 2023 I dont understand the sudden rush if its not ready.
More magic tricks plz, lol!
I think if Apple can make a headset that has at least 150° FOV as my old oculus quest 2’s field of vision was terrible, the graphics also need to improve by a huge margin to what they are today
It’s rumored to have a 120 degrees FOV, which is a good baseline
Which machine do you think will be the minimum required for Apple VR development? Would the base M2 Pro MacBook Pro 14" model be enough?
This is literally what apple is going to use as a base line for the presentation. These guys got hired to put this out to prep the people and organize the presentation.
True
Let’s also see what they do with iOS 17. Since you’ll need your iPhone to power the headset too.
Maybe the headset has to be heavily integrated into mac OS and IOs. So they might show the headset and also how the new OS versions work together with it.
And works well with apple watch and airpods pro etc
I’m more of a feature and content + software kind of guy, and but if I’m bedazzled by the surprise that we call “One More Thing” at Apple WWDC and they do launch the beta RealityOS and the headset for developers and partners then I’m keen to know where it will go, how will second generation ROS will look like and if the design of the headset would be any different will there be a merger with a triple AAA games company under Apple Arcade trademark, who knows, if it costs $3,000 and only for North America there goes my hope.
9min video on what might happen
If it can run huge games in VR, e.g. Hogarth Legacy, then it will sell to at least gamers, even at a high cost.
It's going to be call iBra.
i want a blue imacs from the past please help its a whole new world for me
Bridget da goat
if we are equating it to the iphone launch i wonder what basic feature will be missing in VR.. we know meta didnt have legs.. whats apples cut/copy/paste vr equivalent :p
It probably wont be released until iPhone 20…or when 1-2nm chip are availble for it to be efficient in battery
It's not gonna cost $3k. More likely it will cost $1799 - 2199. Many will say it's not that bad but I think apple will struggle after the initial release.
If the headset is anything like the NReal Air but clear like normal glasses, and completely wireless with a 10 hour or more battery, then they got my money.
im going to buy it
Nah, it has to be glasses to become mainstream. Headsets are probably niche, can't overcome VR sickness from PSVR2 for the past few weeks. $300, maybe I'll buy.
I’d like the idea of a mixed reality headset but, I think it’s a bad idea to announce it at WWDC, because I think it should have its own event,without having to share the spotlight with software like WatchOS, iOS, TVOS & MacOS
(ALSO)…since everything is getting so expensive… Here’s a idea maybe Apple should hold off until the economy and inflation rates goes back down
Like apple tv, so much hype but when it came out nothing much crazy there but Apple car will be amazing
Will people even be able to afford it? If the uptake is low, that might set back another VR/AR product.
Woah the Mother who review the Transformers😅
I thought you covered toys?
Apple silicon is not optimised for simulation it would be fail
The fake thumb at 5:03 looooool
Br is the best thing happen in youtube
What to do with this thing?
_$3000?!?!?_ That can’t be right.
I do have faith that if ANYONE can crack this platform, it's Apple. But I really hope they don't fall into the enterprise trap and lock it behind insane pricing and limited content.
This looks like an SNL bit
There are to many vr headsets out there but what we need is triple a big vr games that no brand is focused on currently. Sony might be only one doing so going forward
I love her videos.
I have huge doubts, after spending some time with the so called best VR Headset for the moment, the PSVR2, I still think it is way to far out for this product category to be prime time ready. People still get vertigo and all kinds of things from VR. Even if chips like m2 get faster and faster, 2x 4K @120 fps screens for VR are still impossible to delivery to. Additionally they really would need a killer app, and so many people already tried and failed to deliver that, including FB, HTC etc.
Apple do need to get this right if they are launching this VR product and questionable timing of this product coming out as well. If they can create an environment that is a customizable and interactive like quest 2 but they can add their apple products to this! Apple TV theater, virtual workout spaces! Come on!!!!!
Host's facial expressions are giving Cocomelon
Ypu've got so many clever people at CNET, for so many years, why her? she's not he right person for this!
Does anyone else feel like this is an Onion newscast? Lol
I can bet my life saving that apples not gonna launch the headset just announce it
I would love to buy it but no one ones buying it in this economy
I own the Vive XR Elite got it day one and the setup took sometime but the hand tracking is another level all together vs Meta Quest 2 the only other headset I own that has hand tracking. I also own HTC Vive Pro 2 and HP Reverb G2. I think what Apple going to do is similar to Meta and HTC with video passthrough vs magic leap optic stuff. The reason the technology is no where near ready as seen by magic leap issues with object transparency and difficulty with light levels and cost. Meta Quest Pro uses local dimming vs OLED and is able to compensate somewhat for lack of no OLED. Vive XR Elite still uses LED and is somewhat effected by lack of true black but it's video passthrough and hand tracking is completely at another level. I think Apple looking to bring to market a lower cost XR headset using technology brought over by Sony and their PSVR 2 headset. It has OLED and has amazing head tracking as well as higher resolution micro OLED then the LED inside of ether Meta Quest Pro and HTC Vive XR Elite. If they combine their technology with AR and camara technology with Sony micro-OLED displays from PSVR 2 at a 1000 to 1500 dollar price point with some form of iPhone integration it will be a pretty big deal especially with rumors of them working with Steam for gaming. I have a feeling these are the reasons why steam has not introduced a replacement yet for Steam Valve Index because they are waiting for Sony or LG to ramp up production of their OLED.
She has always been the best reporting/storytelling in tech.
Looks like Apple owns CNET.
What? Bridget was literally critiquing Apple within the first minute of the video. Tell me you only reacted to the title without telling me, reactionary loser.
I haven't watched a Bridget video for like a decade. She's still pretty!
Love this girl
Why is Apple Music Apple
I believe Apple has pushed their "we come a few years after everyone but make it better" strategy a bit too far. Every other company has already tried this before, it didn't work (I mean, there are products, but they are not a must), and it is not a new concept, as VR headsets already existed in the 1980's... Even Meta, that tried to push the "Metaverse" concept very hard, is moving on to conversational AI, which is the new thing everyone want to jump to right now.
VR enthusiasts like me have usually invested a lot of time and money in VR. And what already exists will be further developed by AIs at breakneck speed. I will defnitly not start anew with VR. If Apple manages to integrate generative AIs that can be controlled by voice commands in VR, this could be exciting. Otherwise, I predict a niche product for the followers of the Holy Apple Church
We all know it’s not going to be perfect, things won’t work well, there’ll be a software update and it’ll fix things but it’ll be months after launch like all their other products.
5:00
Remember 2007?
I think they will go the AR way not VR
for 3K it's dead in the water. PSVR2+PS5 costs a third of that.
PSVR2 has a killer app, Horizon VR, as well as a bunch more coming.
I use a gaming PC and a quest, and the total combined cost is under 2 grand. Half life Alyx and VR chat are the killer apps.
VR for stuff other then gaming is not fully fleshed out yet.
I think only Bridget is the only one waiting..😊