"tech bruo-brulh-bluh-brother", he hadn't decided whether he was trying to appeal to millennials or middle age dads in that question so ended up looking cringy to both.
These guys aren’t capable of that , all they have is petty point scoring mainly because I dint believe either of them have a clue what to do about the real problems.
@@tatata1543 While it wouldn't solve all problems overnight, if politicians did have to focus on policies more than trying to sound cool while making insults, it may in the long run improve politics ans train the public and media to focus on policy
PMQs shouldn't exist like this with the lame ass jeering, the opposition should be allowed assemble a committee weekly to address the issues they want in-depth and other parties (If they have seats) should be allowed to have their leaders there Westminster reps there like Ed Davey, Stephen Flynn, Liz Saville, Jeffrey Donaldson etc. any other debates concerning bills should continue in the commons
@@Antipaxos_Nadja123 yeah but I think that is driven to try and get a reaction from the party at large...it's entertainment for the masses. The committee format is always more formal and policy driven...if you had the Westminster representatives of the DUP, Plaid Cymru present in a committee, places like NI and Scotland would get more respect from the PM and the opposition would get actual answers
Another example of Jelly Roll Hoyle, the so called Commons Speaker allowing Sunak to bypass opposition's well framed questions and to go off on a rant about issues in no way related to the questions asked. Sunak, along with your Lacky Hoyle go now, the Electorate of the UK has had enough.
She's doing that at the moment, but as soon as Sunak gets kicked out in the next general election, she'll swiftly change her attitude and try her best to become the next Tory leader.
I noticed the price of diesel is going up quickly, I wonder if the still high cost of living is being seriously discussed in Parliament...... *sees this BS clown show*
For all the Tories' ills, I really wish David Cameron had been able to go through with parliamentary reforms to get rid of this kinda of farsical nonsense.
I expect real terms wages & living standards to improve incrementally for most people if Starmer wins because the last time the war criming/Blairite/Thatcherlite wing of Labour were in charge that's pretty much what we got out of them. Starmer won't have to do much to be an improvement on this government; a smidge less idiocy & brazen corruption will probably be enough to either have some sort of positive impact or at least slow the decline with a few sticking plasters. I won't be voting Labour or encouraging anybody else to, they're definitely winning the election as well as in my constituency. I think the imminent mk2 Blairism is going to offer very slim pickings, having inherited a worse economy than last time, & since Blairites have zero values they're far more likely to impliment anything remotely positive if they feel some threat on their left flank from the Green party, (so I joined them).
It's embarrasing to think that many countries in the world screen 'Prime Minister's Questions.' Clive below is correct. 'Punch & Judy! It's a pity that Starmer, instead of spending all week thinking of pathetic little gags, doesn't tell us what his policies are. He thinks he's a funnny man. As for Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves. All they do is sit there nodding every week. That is very rich coming from Starmer and Labour about early release prisoners. They've done likewise every time they have come to power.
Funny PoliticsJoe starting to be more critical of Starmer as the party moves more to the centre ground and it become more apparent he’ll win. Hoped this channel would offer unbiased political commentary, not be a left-wing lolcow generator
Dear, dear God! How any of them have the nerve to whinge about the public behaving badly, particularly towards mps when they behave like this! No wonder Scotland wants independence.🙄
I look forward to the Tories moaning at Starmer not answering questions when/if he becomes PM. He can throw it back in their faces by telling them how many times Sunak refused to answer questions at PMQs, it must be in the hundreds.
Why would you look forward to that? Wouldn’t you rather have a PM that actually answered questions intelligently, clearly and concisely? The only options we’re being left with at the next election are a party that can’t be bothered trying to make progress and a party that wants to make things worse.
@@ekuIuke Because Johnson and Sunak never answered questions, and cardboard cut out Hoyle wakes up once in a blue moon and says its PMQs ,not leader of the opposition clues. I've said many times, rules should be brought in where a PM refusing to answer is noted, and the question will be added to the following weeks, and so on until a PM is forced to answer. These people need reminding the public deserve answers,infact demand answers.
I mean if you’re saying nothing will change under Starmer, more scummy Tory behaviour in Government then you’re not wrong, but I wonder why you look forward to it?
@@jonsmith5058 Because you can guarentee the Tories will moan like hell if Starmer doesn't answer a question, they'll then know what we've all felt when Sunak never answers a question. No PM of any party should be allowed to ignore and deflect, the public should have an expectation of PMs to answer questions.
What Sunak knows about AI etc has all been picked up from troubling sources like Musk. He is a novice and you can write what he knows on the back of a postage stamp in capital letters!
Where,s those workers right changes in them 6 pledges Starmer, until they come back you can shove your labour vote from me, and I hope thousands of other people.
![เปิดบ้าน เปิด Supercar อั๋นโอกิ เคยเอา rolls Royce เเลกพระ องค์ละ 100 ล้าน l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FeGwJwXauZ0/mqdefault.jpg)
![เปิดบ้าน เปิด Supercar อั๋นโอกิ เคยเอา rolls Royce เเลกพระ องค์ละ 100 ล้าน l [Nickynachat]](/img/tr.png)
![ทททททททท #27 [หลุยส์ เค โตมายังไง ณ สระบุรี]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CaKoYw_Xmtg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[4K] TREASURE(트레저) “KING KONG” Band LIVE Concert 킹콩은 라이브를 찢어🦍 [it’s KPOP LIVE 잇츠라이브]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/p8bLLOxPDD8/mqdefault.jpg)
Tech Brother vs Steam Bro: choose your fighter
"tech bruo-brulh-bluh-brother", he hadn't decided whether he was trying to appeal to millennials or middle age dads in that question so ended up looking cringy to both.
This juvenile Punch and Judy level of political discourse just plays to the gallery. Pathetic state of affairs. Neither of them are fit for purpose.
exactly
bUt tHeY aRe aLl tHe sAmE - Dribbled the Tory bedwetter.
Unless we have a leader that will close tax havens down and tax billionaires, life will get worse for nearly all of us.
This process is not debate, it is theatre. Reform Parliament top to bottom.
"Tech bro be b brother "
"techbrow bro bruther brother"
Check it out now. The tech bro brother.
Right about now. The tech bro-br-brother
Not the biggest political priority right now I know, but would it be so difficult just to change the rules so politicians can debate in a normal way?
These guys aren’t capable of that , all they have is petty point scoring mainly because I dint believe either of them have a clue what to do about the real problems.
@@tatata1543 While it wouldn't solve all problems overnight, if politicians did have to focus on policies more than trying to sound cool while making insults, it may in the long run improve politics ans train the public and media to focus on policy
PMQs shouldn't exist like this with the lame ass jeering, the opposition should be allowed assemble a committee weekly to address the issues they want in-depth and other parties (If they have seats) should be allowed to have their leaders there Westminster reps there like Ed Davey, Stephen Flynn, Liz Saville, Jeffrey Donaldson etc. any other debates concerning bills should continue in the commons
@@IsaacSemple it would be good if it were actual questions rather than one up man ship
@@Antipaxos_Nadja123 yeah but I think that is driven to try and get a reaction from the party at large...it's entertainment for the masses. The committee format is always more formal and policy driven...if you had the Westminster representatives of the DUP, Plaid Cymru present in a committee, places like NI and Scotland would get more respect from the PM and the opposition would get actual answers
Another example of Jelly Roll Hoyle, the so called Commons Speaker allowing Sunak to bypass opposition's well framed questions and to go off on a rant about issues in no way related to the questions asked. Sunak, along with your Lacky Hoyle go now, the Electorate of the UK has had enough.
If this is cringe, would hate to see how they’ll attempt to appeal to Gen Z/millennials in the upcoming election
They’ve never tried before, don’t imagine they’ll start now.
Tech bro 😂 ouch
Badenoch looks up at sunak like a little girl admiring her daddy......weird!
She's doing that at the moment, but as soon as Sunak gets kicked out in the next general election, she'll swiftly change her attitude and try her best to become the next Tory leader.
Nice to see Brian Badonde back on the telly
The Black & White Minsteral show, Coconut "Chemo Babbadook" in the background?!
Proud tradition of leading the world...... and look at it now.
I noticed the price of diesel is going up quickly, I wonder if the still high cost of living is being seriously discussed in Parliament......
*sees this BS clown show*
"Sunake" is far more cringing?!
We’re all bloody doomed if either of these get in. Pathetic.
Ha ha they moved Morden up the chair. I liked watching her face when her prime minister chats BS. I miss that
Is BS short for BullShit or BollockS ? 😂
If they just want to share banters at the PMQs, at least the jibes should be better than "tech bro" and "steam bro."
Steam Bro Willie
For all the Tories' ills, I really wish David Cameron had been able to go through with parliamentary reforms to get rid of this kinda of farsical nonsense.
Hes the one who damaged the country.
Pitiful...the both of them.
Phones shouldn't be allowed in parliament. No wonder the Tories act like children.
So petty! Can we have some grown-ups in the room and send the children to the naughty step now?
Sunak = Insidious
Keir is cool man😎
They are all belleneds! In it for themselves!
What a buffoon. Possibly rishi's weakest deflective non-answer yet.
Pair of mummy’s men.
Vote Reform UK 🇬🇧
no
Hello tech brother where art thou?
I just dont understand why are people expecting more from Starmer than from the PM himself
I expect real terms wages & living standards to improve incrementally for most people if Starmer wins because the last time the war criming/Blairite/Thatcherlite wing of Labour were in charge that's pretty much what we got out of them.
Starmer won't have to do much to be an improvement on this government; a smidge less idiocy & brazen corruption will probably be enough to either have some sort of positive impact or at least slow the decline with a few sticking plasters.
I won't be voting Labour or encouraging anybody else to, they're definitely winning the election as well as in my constituency.
I think the imminent mk2 Blairism is going to offer very slim pickings, having inherited a worse economy than last time, & since Blairites have zero values they're far more likely to impliment anything remotely positive if they feel some threat on their left flank from the Green party, (so I joined them).
He will do better than Sunak but , in all honesty, that’s a very low bar to clear.
It's embarrasing to think that many countries in the world screen 'Prime Minister's Questions.' Clive below is correct. 'Punch & Judy! It's a pity that Starmer, instead of spending all week thinking of pathetic little gags, doesn't tell us what his policies are. He thinks he's a funnny man. As for Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves. All they do is sit there nodding every week. That is very rich coming from Starmer and Labour about early release prisoners. They've done likewise every time they have come to power.
What else is he supposed to do with a zombie government who keep throwing out nonsense policies every week, then uturn on them the next??
I bet you want Jeremy Corbyn back?
Funny PoliticsJoe starting to be more critical of Starmer as the party moves more to the centre ground and it become more apparent he’ll win.
Hoped this channel would offer unbiased political commentary, not be a left-wing lolcow generator
Zero seats ❤
Starmer, pityful leader(?) of the opposition! Useless!
Dear, dear God! How any of them have the nerve to whinge about the public behaving badly, particularly towards mps when they behave like this! No wonder Scotland wants independence.🙄
Sunak knows nothing about technological advances.....it's power by association: same as his unelected premiership.
Voting Tory 👍
I look forward to the Tories moaning at Starmer not answering questions when/if he becomes PM. He can throw it back in their faces by telling them how many times Sunak refused to answer questions at PMQs, it must be in the hundreds.
Why would you look forward to that? Wouldn’t you rather have a PM that actually answered questions intelligently, clearly and concisely? The only options we’re being left with at the next election are a party that can’t be bothered trying to make progress and a party that wants to make things worse.
@@ekuIuke Because Johnson and Sunak never answered questions, and cardboard cut out Hoyle wakes up once in a blue moon and says its PMQs ,not leader of the opposition clues. I've said many times, rules should be brought in where a PM refusing to answer is noted, and the question will be added to the following weeks, and so on until a PM is forced to answer. These people need reminding the public deserve answers,infact demand answers.
I mean if you’re saying nothing will change under Starmer, more scummy Tory behaviour in Government then you’re not wrong, but I wonder why you look forward to it?
@@jonsmith5058 Because you can guarentee the Tories will moan like hell if Starmer doesn't answer a question, they'll then know what we've all felt when Sunak never answers a question. No PM of any party should be allowed to ignore and deflect, the public should have an expectation of PMs to answer questions.
@@GerryT. but again, who cares, Starmer is a Tory, so whats the difference now? Its just more of the same.
What Sunak knows about AI etc has all been picked up from troubling sources like Musk. He is a novice and you can write what he knows on the back of a postage stamp in capital letters!
Where,s those workers right changes in them 6 pledges Starmer, until they come back you can shove your labour vote from me, and I hope thousands of other people.