This is fascinating in terms of the MMN. Lots of language learning methods ask people to begin by producing sounds correctly, the audio lingua method for example. It is still probably the most commonly used. If people's problems making sounds are because they can't perceive sounds then this is just never going to be effective. Years of research seems to say that it is reception that builds language knowledge and is ignored. Surely research that was able to show that making sounds is connected to having processed them would be pretty hard to ignore.
Also, does the reading task sound like the implicit (procedural) v explicit knowledge distinction? What do others think? Bill Van Patten talks about language-like behavior. People who acquire language by exposure to it when listening and reading develop explicit knowledge and can use it effortlessly. People who learn rules may be able, with an effort to, to produce sentences.
My brain goes into P600 trying to process the speaker’s barrage of OKs and Rights, with the occasional murmur thrown in. After much wasted effort to extract cognitive meaning from this barrage and, having no algorithm to process only meaningful verbal signals in the context of meaningful ones, my brain suggests it has better things to do than process more of this bespattered lecture. I agree and terminate the lecture, adding 50 minutes to my life.
Thank you, Guys!!!
This was a phenomenal lecture. Thank you. Very interesting work and masterfully presented
This is fascinating in terms of the MMN. Lots of language learning methods ask people to begin by producing sounds correctly, the audio lingua method for example. It is still probably the most commonly used. If people's problems making sounds are because they can't perceive sounds then this is just never going to be effective. Years of research seems to say that it is reception that builds language knowledge and is ignored. Surely research that was able to show that making sounds is connected to having processed them would be pretty hard to ignore.
Also, does the reading task sound like the implicit (procedural) v explicit knowledge distinction? What do others think? Bill Van Patten talks about language-like behavior. People who acquire language by exposure to it when listening and reading develop explicit knowledge and can use it effortlessly. People who learn rules may be able, with an effort to, to produce sentences.
so useful lecture . thanks a lot for you
thanks dearest God for this good and useful lecture
Before look at this lesson withou any knowledge from other people incorrectly learned in my mind the mommy is aditionary this my own theory
Thank the One and Holy Christ, slayer of the evil Kenites, for this educations.
My brain goes into P600 trying to process the speaker’s barrage of OKs and Rights, with the occasional murmur thrown in. After much wasted effort to extract cognitive meaning from this barrage and, having no algorithm to process only meaningful verbal signals in the context of meaningful ones, my brain suggests it has better things to do than process more of this bespattered lecture. I agree and terminate the lecture, adding 50 minutes to my life.
at 36.08 minutes... Which are the people?- or " who are the people- Grammar is not a strong point at teachers colleges...LOL
It's not that funny unless one's sense of humour is very shallow.
That’s all you got out of this? Learning must not be a strong point for you lol