lubna as per international reserch indias gdp ,before muslim ruler is 38 % of worlds gdp , after muslim invention ,is go down 24 % ,and when british left india is 2 %
lubna kitnee bevkufee bharee batey kar rahee ho ,imigrants and inveders ko tum ek sath compare kartee ho ,imigrants us countrie key permissions sey vaha per work key liyey jatey hai ,vaha per us mulk key law ko folow kartey hai ,vaha kee goverment ko own kartey hai taxes pay kartey hai ,inveders kisee mulk per hamla karker kabja karta ha vaha kee awam per julm karker lootker vo money apney orignal mulk bhejta hai isey choree and lootna kehtey hai ,kal koi england mey aker robery karey choree karey vo money apney mulk bhejey vo same hai ?
There are nuances pertaining to global gdp uss ke liye aap ko thoda zyaaaada research karna padega. As far as mugals sending money to central asia is Concerned , there are two ways to look at that First the money was sent Out of the proceeds Of Forceful tax collection, loots and plunder of many religious places as recorded by the Mughal historians themselves, second One Has to see the proportion of the money being invested outside And the time went into it was invested by the rulers.For example, the money to construct the canal.Indiraq was invested when large parts of rajasthan was experiencing famine. Such thing don't bestowe a ruler Whose priorities are misplaced.
@Lubna.Evolve The graph he showed at 10:30 explains the GDP throughout the history. And no one like to whine about the past all the time, the problem is with not acknowledging the atrocities that were done and instead whitewashing those. I consider it a slap to the innocent people who lost their lives for nothing.
Every colonizers Mughals or British…. They looted Bharat for hundreds of years… but just un 75 years post independence… Bharat has reached to 5th largest economy and the Mughal countries are no where close to… that tells you the capability of Sanatan culture and scientific temperament
Just know history to not Repeat the mistakes. For now we in India should try to make true secular governance and try to keep demography so that not another split happen in future.
Lubna ji aapka ye point bhi clear kar du ki jab mughal aaye tab 32% world GDP main India contribution tha, Aur Jab British aaye uss time bhi Mughal rule tha Delhi main aur GDP decline hokar 25% ho gayi thi, aur ye time tha 1761- 1857, Jab finally 1857 main purra India British Rule ke under aaya tab 16% ho gayi GDP contribution. Aur jab British gaye India se tab ye 2-4% Bach gayi. Matalab Jab British aaye tab 25% tha GDP ( under Mughal) aur jab British ne Whole India takeover kiya uss time 16% tha, aur Last main decline hothe hothe 2-4% bachh gayi GDP contribution. I hope aap ye point samjh gayi hogi.
25:33 Indian mslmn consider mughals as their forefathers is wrong approach.. They should consider Hindus as their ancestors. Then their will be no fight over telling the bitter truth. It's fact that all forefathers of mslmns were Indians converted forcefully.
Bhai fir superiority kaise jatayenge fir sabit ho jayega ke talwar ke zor pe khatna hua. Koyi chaku leke khud ki naak kat leta hai kya? Sirf muslim ki nahi har "convert" ki yahi samasya hai
Lubna ji aapne kuch point miss kar diye hai. 1. 40000 Temple destruction by Mughal 2. Mass killing of innocent Hindus by Mughal. 3. Jaziya Tax on Non Muslim ( Hindu) 4. Order Of Mughal that convert in islaam, otherwise dies. 5. No help at the famine time for Hindus. And many more. Aap hum per trust nahi karo, aap khud Mughals ki autobiography study karo, Jo sabhi Mughal kings ne khud likhi hai. Online mill jayegi with English translation. Ruler aur invaders main fark hota hai Lubna ji. Kya West main Hitler ki achi cheez padhayi jaati hai? Nahi na? Aisa tho hai nahi ki Hitler ne Germans ke liye kuch bhi accha nahi kiya. Larger picture se dekho tho hitler cruel tha, isiliye sab cruel he Bolte hai. Aur Mughal aur British dono cruel the. Agar Mughal aur British ki cruelty dekhni hai tho kabhi India aana aapko har jagah inki nishaniyan mill jayegi. Jaise White Americans ne Native American ko wipe out Kiya, British ne Australia aur New Zealand ke natives ko wipe out Kiya. Aap ka thought process Western hai isiliye aap inn subject ko bahut lightly dekh rahi hai, kyuki aapki education West main hui hai isiliye aapko ye sab justified aur normal lagta hai.🙏🙏🙏
I could not agree more with you 👍 Because lubna sister is born in west and know nothing about India or when she speak about India she keeps pakistan is mind ( pakistan's perspective of looking at india) so she is not able to understand the pain of us. Then as a britain citizen she could not criticise british about their atrocities too. She has limitations there. At most she can say like other indian muslim intellectuals or current generation british that forget past . The fact is they never publicly accepted let alone apologize for bad deeds, infact they make excuses to defend it. But Karma is a bitch which hunting them down. See today's all islamic countries or present day Europe.
25:56 Lubna…Mughals never ruled entire Bharat that being said… immigrants don’t loot from locals.. Mufhals looted from Indians sent to their own country-- how can you even compare the two scenarios??
I come from a Rajput family. I'm a direct descendant of that group who were among the resistance which defended the attack on Krishna Janmbhoomi temple by Aurangzeb. It's like Al Aqsa or Al Harem or Al Madina for Hindus. Still, they were able to almost completely break the temple except a few walls. I grew up hearing about those centuries old events.
@@JF17Thunder-f6c He conquered Sindh and Multan areas. Pakistanis today are living under mental colonisation. Read about Umayyad Campaigns in India. Who won the war. Just see the name of victor side.
@@JF17Thunder-f6c Qasim conquered Sindh and area around Multan. So, he conquered land of Pakistanis who are still mentally colonised. Read about Umayyad Campaigns in India and see the name of victor. It's very very easy to read, although I'm not sure about literacy skills of Pakistanis. The truth is just one google search away.
Do yourself a favour and read about Umayyad campaigns in India. Qasim captured Sindh and Multan which is in Pakistan today. You accepted slavery and still wearing the chains proudly, we never did. Just do one google search and see who's the victor.
Aaj se 1100 saal pehle Bharat ki GDP lagbhag 60% thi aur usse bhi pehle samrat ashok ke raaj me GDP 75% thi Bharat ki 🙄 Britishers ne jo loota wo aaj ki appreciation value joddkar lagbhag 45 TRILLION DOLLARS .... I repeat 👉 45 TRILLION DOLLARS 👈 banta hai 🙄😔😢
Mughals were not immigrants working under a local kingdom, they were rulers. They were sending Indian tax payer's money to foreign land. Like if Rishi Sunak took money from treasury and sent it to his relatives in India.
her logic of comparing invaders to immigrants in sending money home is super dumb. each and every immigrant works very hard to earn money. an invader snatches the produce. under invaders the life of colonized people is sub human.
before mugals india had a gdp of 32 % in world share and till the end of mugals it came down to 11- 16 % then came british who were even worse for india and its people , and during thIs period india gdp came to 2% , hope you understand know THANK YOU
Sending earned money to your native country is different than sending nation’s treasure to foreign countries. Nation’s treasure belongs to its people not foreign countries.
🚩🇮🇳💚💛🩵🙏🧡🩵🇮🇳🚩Dear Lubna indian original history jaanate hai. 32 percent GDP mugakl se pahale tha aur onke time me 16 percent houa aur British emperors me 4 percent per chor kar gate
29:18 Immigrants bhejte hain families ko. UK govt nahi. Agar UK govt Saudi ko pura paisa bhejne lage aur majority Christians ko dabake rakhhe, unse tax le but muslims se tax na le, to kaisa hoga ? Shashi Tharoor ka wo baat yaad aa gaya, "A burglar comes into your house, stubs his toe, and then you say, there was a sacrifice on both sides. This is not an acceptable argument." Don't try to justify these thieves. achhi history padhane se hindu muslims ko problems nahi,, awareness badhegi. British rule sahi padhate hain idhar, hame problems hoti hai kya angrezo se ? Apka religion, preference, choice jo bhi ho, choro ko defend nahi kiya jaa sakta. Justification galat hai, aur opinion bhi.
I agree fully about not extrapolating. But where does the first extrapolation come from ? and which one is a reaction? The muslims of India primarily , have said they are proud of Aurangzeb , countless muslims name their children Aurangzeb , can you imagine that ma'am? They say they have ruled India for 800 years and they may rule again ! They count themsleves with the brutal invaders and don't accept that even their great grandmothers went through the same atrocious times.
There is a difference between sending remittance to foreign country by a Ruler and by an individual . One should not treat them equal. As a responsibility of ruler, the amount need to be reinvested for well being of local society and economy growth.
Correct a ruler loots money and siphon off to foreign land unlike an individual who invariably sends his hard earned money to his homeland Therefore there can be comparision between two situations .
Let me tell you with greatest possible respect that after first Islamic invasion of Bharat by Mohammad bin Qasim there was a veer from Bharat named Bappa Rawal the Deewan of Mewad who not only defeated Mohammad bin Qasim but also destroyed the entire Muslim umma from Sindh till tooran in present day Iran due to which no Jihadi even tried to attack Bharat for next 480 years and remember this is called real Khauf and on his name only present day Rawal pindi in Pakistan is named. But hypocrite historians will never talk about this, we don't want hear the stories of these Jihadis and monsters who tried to conquer the world but were not able to conquer their own desire instead we Hindus want to hear history about our great Sanatani heroes Like Rajputs, Marathas, Sikhs, Ahoms, Jatts, Cholas, Cheras, Pandyas, Gurakhas, Reddy and list go on and on , who sacrificed their existence so that we Sanatanis could exist🙏
Folks who migrated to the west and US sent money to their homelands thru sheer dint of hard work, and not by exploiting the local resources. Whereas the Mughals and the British repatriated money by exploiting the local natural and Human Resources.
I always feel that Justifying middle eastern colonisation is like defending European colonisation. Better both never happened in the first place. Native people should have the right to rule over their nations.
Madam mughals aur British Bharat mei paisa imandari se business ya kaam karkay kamanay nahi aaye thay unhonay yaha per logo ko atyachar julm karkay loota hai aur unkay desh le gaye hai yaha ka paisa. Unki imandari ki kamai nahi thi, unki kamai loot ki thi. Aabhi hum log bahar jakar imandari aur mehenath aur unkay rules mei rehekar kamakay latey hai aapnay desh, unko loot kar nahi kamatay hai paisa. Ye farak hai. HAR HAR MAHADEV 🚩 🙏 JAI HIND JAI BHARAT 🇮🇳
Mughals forced people to convert religion, but the British converted Indian education system to produce clerks who could take orders and stop creative thinking. Unfortunately, the Indian governments continued with the same system post independence and hence there have been no scientific discoveries in India, though the same Indians flourish in research in foreign universities. So the bigger long term damage was done by the British rule. Indian kings never attacked foreign countries, but they were not united in their defense either. They use to join the invaders to avenge the neighboring Indian Kingdom. The invaders and even present day foreign states, take advantage of these schisms that always existed in the Indian society.
Lubna, no Germans or christans say Hitler is great and hero of germany, they consider him as villan, but muslims and their communist sympathizers say mughals are great and portrayed aurangzeb as hero.........this is the sad part
Upto 10-11th century Indian GDP was around 32% but then continuous Islamists attacks lead Indian GDP to 24% in peak mughal period around 16th century and around 16-18% during its end ....
IMHO ...there is a huge difference between invading a country , looting wealth of that country by atrocities on the native people AND migrating to another country and sending hard earned money back home for family as a earning member of that family. Thanks
11:45 One janeu (yagyopvit - a thread worn around the neck - rather above the left shoulder and under the right arm) weighs around less than five grams, now calculate the number of people killed according to the weight of janeu mentioned in the video. 75 ×40 = 3000 kg convert in gms = 30 lac grams ÷ 5 gms = 6 lac people approximately
And about GDP go and research by yourself, you will get to know no need to believe anyone. And yes even if your economy got reduced to 16-20 percent from 32 percent then also 16 % was a significant amount to be called as crown it is just a common sense 😂
Please read Biography of Babur, akbar, Jahaangir, Aurangjeb by their Courtiers Search about Sone ki Chidiya Before Muslim Invaders 🇮🇳India was Sone ki Chidiya Sab kar rahe toh iska matlab kya voh achchha ho gaya
As you are commenting that during the Mughal Empire whatever GDP was, who were those contributing in the country's GDP ? think and give me answers, they were Indian farmers, artisans and businessmen, or they were foreigners.
Let me tell you about the gdp ratios.. When mughal entered india.. Which is around 1500 ad India had gdp of 32% , when british entered india as east india company in 1600s india's gdp share in world was 25%(by this time mughals were at peak), when mughal kingdom officially ended and official british raj started after 1st war of independence in 1857..indias share of gdp in world was 16%, and in 1947 when india got independence, the global share of indias gdp had dropped to 2-3%...hope this helps
Wah didi wah ! . atanki Kom muslim MUGHAL ko aap immigrants bol kar kya sabit karna chahti ho ?? . Aap kis muslim atanki Kom ki support se bol rahi ho? Tumne to Islam chhor dia qki wo Kom atanki hai fir bhi support q???
Bhai inki puri kaum hi esi hai iski ek video na dekhu aj ke bad iski har video ese hoti hai alag hi logic pel rhi hai hmare youtuber inse collab krte hai
YES GDP WAS 25% WHEN MUGHALS RULED INDIA. BUT THEY BROUGHT IT DOWN FROM 32% SO THE RIGHT THING TO SAY IS THAT INDIAN GDP WENT DOWN BY 7% UNDER MUGHALS. MUGHALS WERE A NEGATIVE MEANING A BAD EFFECT ON INDIA. BRITISH REDUCED INDIAN GDP TO MUCH LESSER AS THEY WERE A INDUSTRIAL NATION BY THEN. PLEASE TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS.
Lubna , have you thought about doing a video as a reminder, about Tipu Sultan? A Muslim who the Hindus have erased from history .IMO India should never have been divided and it is only a matter of time before India will conquer both Bangladesh and Pakistan for the good of humanity.
@Lubna.Evolve The graph he showed at 10:30 explains the GDP throughout the history. And no one like to whine about the past all the time, the problem is with not acknowledging the carnage and instead whitewashing that. I consider it a slap to the innocent people who lost their lives for nothing.
No doubt, the darkest period of history has been painted by Congress Govt. Which is unfortunately worst and condemnable. Thanks for exploring dark chapter.
I agree with you in Toto Dear Lubna. It is there with all countries that invaders did something good also in the country they have ruled directly or indirectly. Greatest example is Taj Mahal and others which is even now fetching a lots of revenue by way of tourism. Let the History be histry in its true sense and values. Nice upload Lubbaji.
You deduced correctly that Mughal rulers were much like any random foreigner living in another country. They remained loyal primarily to their homeland, their native religion, culture and language. But the problem is that in Indian history textbooks they're portrayed as national heroes who totally assimilated into the Indian culture and society. This video appeared to be an attempt to debunk that false narrative. 🥂
Bharat ko 1000 saal se loota gaya hai...mughal toh keval 1500 me aaye lekin woh rulers the jinhone na school banaye na canals banaye agriculture ke liye aur na hi koi research institute banaya..unhone keval bharat ko loota aur agar aurangzeb, babur ki real history padhni hai toh aap Baburnama, Maasir e alamgiri padh lo ki kya kiya aur use woh kitna gloriously bata rahe hai
25:50 talking about empires coming and going is a lie. india did not conquer/invade anyone. it did not conquer central asia or china or europe or north america or south america.
Lubna, all he's telling was about that In Indian texts of education Mughal dynasty must not be glorified as it has been portrayed. The actual facts as shown in this video must be written as it is. That's it.
Lubna ji, you mentioned that invading empires were common place. Would you care to comment as to which countries India invaded and conquered over the years?
29:22 😂😂😂 and you are comparing the remittances with the looted money sent to foreign countries by Mughals?? I'm sorry but idk why sometimes i really wonder if u have completed yr education from Britain or somewhere else 😂😂. No offense taken none given just think in a little depth about what u just said 😂😂
Aap ye socho agar arab country ke paas oil na ho to wo aisi lavish life ji sakte the ya apna country chala sakte the khud sahi se jaha jaha inki majority hai waha kai country mai ladai hai apas mai he.
Lubna ji aap bol rahi hai ki har government k acche or bure kam hote hai....i agree 👍 But I have a question:- Is logic se kya aaj Taliban ki government or england ki government bhi same hai aapke liye? Bcz jaise Taliban ki government kuch galat ker rehi hai toh england ki government bhi toh kuch galat decision le rehi hogi! 🙄
By your thoughts colonialism is normal. It's okay. Religious persecution and othering is normal. I think you are trying to compare oranges to apples. You can see a straight line from Mughal religious persecution to Bangladeshi or Pakistani religious persecution of non muslims. The mindset of mainstream islamic belivers in subcontinent didn't change. I think it's difficult to understand it from a distance. Key point here is whitewashing of the horrors of the Mughal empire. And the parallels between Arabic colonization and British colonization. But, globally British colonization is accepted as an evil force of the past. Islamic colonization isn't seen in the same adverse light.
Was this Video about...purane samay me colonial empires kya karte the sari duniya me? Or purani history ki bhul kar aage badna chahiye?? ( When the Muslims of the subcontinent aggressively display the same atrocious behaviour) When the British left India, it's global contribution was 4% by the way.
Really lubna kamane aur loot mein koi difference nazar nahi aya ? No our first 5 education ministers were madrasa educated hence islamic atrocities were wiped out .
Muslims know their history in india. And they are proud of what was done proud of auranzeb . So what do u expect . No gdp went down after mughals , check out statics and india was trading with others before islam came . And no govt. Was not ours they were exploitative and were mughal investing in foreign land ?:it was looted from natives and send to land of ola as offerings not investment for returns .
Lubna,The Mughals history doesn't go very well with India ,yet if you check South East Asia..we are the only place where the minorities grew..check Pakistan and Bangladesh minorities...if they grew or if they have fallen..
Mughals were invaders and foreigners so it was not normal first thing second we don't mind of any Indian Empire because atleast they will respect your culture and let me tell cultural is intrinsic to Land not to religion.
Lubnaji Ham aapko regular sunte Hain aur bahut Achcha Apne analysis Kiya Hai Apna point of view bataya lekin sirf hinduon ke upar jajiya tax Kyon Lagaya aur Hamare mandiron ko distroy Kyon Kiya Kyon Kiya ISI vajah se ham log unko napasand Karte Hain
Investment or loot mai fark hota h ,jung do ruler's ke beech hoti h , lekin yaha Mughal coman peoples ko maar rahe te mandiro ko lootna unki habit ho sakti h lekin mandir todna kis liye tha , mandir todne mai energy or money dono lgti h to lutere kis liye itna jor lgaa rahe te
Here in India or Bharat,in our Sanatan Dharmik culture and tradition King is the incarnation of God he always indulges in creating wealth, nurturing and protecting his subjects or common people, that is his Dharm,moreover King also thinks that his service is dedicated to his subject that is his also service of GOD. Nothing belongs to him personally whatever it may be any sort of wealth. So therefore here in India cyclical service goes on.
Brother, you're mistaken. Donating money from your own Walt is not the same as stealing someone's Walt and donating money. It's not your money !.... India also donate / allocate funds for its Neighboring countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Sri Lanka etc It's India's money that they are donating not someone else's money.
There is a time gap between the Mughal rule and British and the discrepancy amongst the GDP figures is due to the distortion induced by biased academics. And immigrants sending money back home is entirely different from colonizers looting and plundering. ❤
This vid🎉eo to be very honest is quite balanced and full of noteworthy content.History should be told the way incidents did happen actually in past.So we should take due care that facts are neither misrepresented nor exaggerated .Only a judicious mind can do that basically.
hii lubna, i think its wrong to compare immigrants sending money to their homes to that of mughals sending money outside india because it was taxpayers money what if UK's former PM rishi sunak send UK's foreign reserve to india i dont think it will be appropriate bec taxpayers money should be used on the welfare of the citizens not on the personal interests of rulers or head of states
1 question to you, why do Mughals have to invade India. becoz they dont have any riches in their Land. So saying that India was prosperous under Mughals , Well !! tell u what we dont need ur opinion abt India... And ur opinions are not gospel words, So I suggest u to mind ur business and not worry abt India or its history. We Indains can take care abt us and u take care abt ur "not so Great Britain"..
Subscribe, Like, Comment, Share and consider Joining as a Member to fully support the channel ❤
lubna as per international reserch indias gdp ,before muslim ruler is 38 % of worlds gdp , after muslim invention ,is go down 24 % ,and when british left india is 2 %
lubna kitnee bevkufee bharee batey kar rahee ho ,imigrants and inveders ko tum ek sath compare kartee ho ,imigrants us countrie key permissions sey vaha per work key liyey jatey hai ,vaha per us mulk key law ko folow kartey hai ,vaha kee goverment ko own kartey hai taxes pay kartey hai ,inveders kisee mulk per hamla karker kabja karta ha vaha kee awam per julm karker lootker vo money apney orignal mulk bhejta hai isey choree and lootna kehtey hai ,kal koi england mey aker robery karey choree karey vo money apney mulk bhejey vo same hai ?
There are nuances pertaining to global gdp uss ke liye aap ko thoda zyaaaada research karna padega. As far as mugals sending money to central asia is Concerned , there are two ways to look at that First the money was sent Out of the proceeds Of Forceful tax collection, loots and plunder of many religious places as recorded by the Mughal historians themselves, second One Has to see the proportion of the money being invested outside And the time went into it was invested by the rulers.For example, the money to construct the canal.Indiraq was invested when large parts of rajasthan was experiencing famine. Such thing don't bestowe a ruler Whose priorities are misplaced.
@@pradeepkumarkamble4017 part of oecd research paper
@Lubna.Evolve The graph he showed at 10:30 explains the GDP throughout the history. And no one like to whine about the past all the time, the problem is with not acknowledging the atrocities that were done and instead whitewashing those. I consider it a slap to the innocent people who lost their lives for nothing.
Every colonizers Mughals or British…. They looted Bharat for hundreds of years… but just un 75 years post independence… Bharat has reached to 5th largest economy and the Mughal countries are no where close to… that tells you the capability of Sanatan culture and scientific temperament
Absolutely TRUE ❤
Absolutely 💯
Now India is on the verge of becoming world's 3rd economy soon if all variables remain intact.
Just know history to not Repeat the mistakes.
For now we in India should try to make true secular governance and try to keep demography so that not another split happen in future.
Mughals did not loot India.
They had no place to send the looted stocks.
Brits looted 40 trillions over 250 yrs.& send the same to UK.
Lubna ji aapka ye point bhi clear kar du ki jab mughal aaye tab 32% world GDP main India contribution tha, Aur Jab British aaye uss time bhi Mughal rule tha Delhi main aur GDP decline hokar 25% ho gayi thi, aur ye time tha 1761- 1857, Jab finally 1857 main purra India British Rule ke under aaya tab 16% ho gayi GDP contribution. Aur jab British gaye India se tab ye 2-4% Bach gayi. Matalab Jab British aaye tab 25% tha GDP ( under Mughal) aur jab British ne Whole India takeover kiya uss time 16% tha, aur Last main decline hothe hothe 2-4% bachh gayi GDP contribution. I hope aap ye point samjh gayi hogi.
let her do her own research if she has the energy
Usne kanha ki wo comment nahi padhati
Sham Sharma show fan button 👇🏼
25:33 Indian mslmn consider mughals as their forefathers is wrong approach.. They should consider Hindus as their ancestors. Then their will be no fight over telling the bitter truth. It's fact that all forefathers of mslmns were Indians converted forcefully.
You said the root cause of the prblm
it is also wrong to assume that they were converted by choice. muhammad himself tried 13 years peacefully and managed only about 50-100.
Bhai fir superiority kaise jatayenge fir sabit ho jayega ke talwar ke zor pe khatna hua. Koyi chaku leke khud ki naak kat leta hai kya? Sirf muslim ki nahi har "convert" ki yahi samasya hai
Correct. I made a similar comment.
A generation which ignores history has no past and no future."
Look at the Situation of Pakistan🇵🇰 and Bangladesh🇧🇩
Pata chal Jaayega unn logo ne kya achchha kiya hai
Achha kuch nahi kiya
Islamic Invaders brought a rape culture to this country.
Lubna ji aapne kuch point miss kar diye hai.
1. 40000 Temple destruction by Mughal
2. Mass killing of innocent Hindus by Mughal.
3. Jaziya Tax on Non Muslim ( Hindu)
4. Order Of Mughal that convert in islaam, otherwise dies.
5. No help at the famine time for Hindus.
And many more.
Aap hum per trust nahi karo, aap khud Mughals ki autobiography study karo, Jo sabhi Mughal kings ne khud likhi hai. Online mill jayegi with English translation. Ruler aur invaders main fark hota hai Lubna ji. Kya West main Hitler ki achi cheez padhayi jaati hai? Nahi na? Aisa tho hai nahi ki Hitler ne Germans ke liye kuch bhi accha nahi kiya. Larger picture se dekho tho hitler cruel tha, isiliye sab cruel he Bolte hai. Aur Mughal aur British dono cruel the. Agar Mughal aur British ki cruelty dekhni hai tho kabhi India aana aapko har jagah inki nishaniyan mill jayegi. Jaise White Americans ne Native American ko wipe out Kiya, British ne Australia aur New Zealand ke natives ko wipe out Kiya. Aap ka thought process Western hai isiliye aap inn subject ko bahut lightly dekh rahi hai, kyuki aapki education West main hui hai isiliye aapko ye sab justified aur normal lagta hai.🙏🙏🙏
Superb..👌
@aabb-rk5xf thank you 🙏🙏🙏
Also it's wrong to compare migrants sending back money home to invaders/rulers looting money and sending money back.
This is irony of Indian Subcontinent myslims..they are not able to digest the facts about Moguls rule & conversion.
I could not agree more with you 👍
Because lubna sister is born in west and know nothing about India or when she speak about India she keeps pakistan is mind ( pakistan's perspective of looking at india) so she is not able to understand the pain of us.
Then as a britain citizen she could not criticise british about their atrocities too. She has limitations there.
At most she can say like other indian muslim intellectuals or current generation british that forget past . The fact is they never publicly accepted let alone apologize for bad deeds, infact they make excuses to defend it.
But Karma is a bitch which hunting them down. See today's all islamic countries or present day Europe.
25:56 Lubna…Mughals never ruled entire Bharat that being said… immigrants don’t loot from locals.. Mufhals looted from Indians sent to their own country-- how can you even compare the two scenarios??
I think Lubna doesn’t realise that this is all propaganda.
I come from a Rajput family.
I'm a direct descendant of that group who were among the resistance which defended the attack on Krishna Janmbhoomi temple by Aurangzeb. It's like Al Aqsa or Al Harem or Al Madina for Hindus.
Still, they were able to almost completely break the temple except a few walls. I grew up hearing about those centuries old events.
@@We_Defeated_Mighty_Umayyads 17 year old young warrior bin qasim conquered the hindustan let alone defeating ummayads
@@JF17Thunder-f6c
He conquered Sindh and Multan areas. Pakistanis today are living under mental colonisation.
Read about Umayyad Campaigns in India. Who won the war. Just see the name of victor side.
@@JF17Thunder-f6c
Qasim conquered Sindh and area around Multan. So, he conquered land of Pakistanis who are still mentally colonised.
Read about Umayyad Campaigns in India and see the name of victor.
It's very very easy to read, although I'm not sure about literacy skills of Pakistanis.
The truth is just one google search away.
Do yourself a favour and read about Umayyad campaigns in India. Qasim captured Sindh and Multan which is in Pakistan today.
You accepted slavery and still wearing the chains proudly, we never did.
Just do one google search and see who's the victor.
@@We_Defeated_Mighty_Umayyadsconverted tend to be more crazier than original 😂. That’s the big difference 😂
Indian is for Indians not for invaders.You should understand that he made video to tell people that our history books are sugar coated that' it.
Aaj se 1100 saal pehle Bharat ki GDP lagbhag 60% thi aur usse bhi pehle samrat ashok ke raaj me GDP 75% thi Bharat ki 🙄 Britishers ne jo loota wo aaj ki appreciation value joddkar lagbhag 45 TRILLION DOLLARS .... I repeat 👉 45 TRILLION DOLLARS 👈 banta hai 🙄😔😢
Excellent..
Mughals were not immigrants working under a local kingdom, they were rulers. They were sending Indian tax payer's money to foreign land.
Like if Rishi Sunak took money from treasury and sent it to his relatives in India.
her logic of comparing invaders to immigrants in sending money home is super dumb.
each and every immigrant works very hard to earn money. an invader snatches the produce. under invaders the life of colonized people is sub human.
It seems she came to this conclusion because of her muslim faith, british citizen and immigrant parents.
@@Kris-q4p4zya super dumb 😢
They were not merely rulers but more precisely invaders whose basic forte being to loot ,convert hindus by force and demolish their places of worship
@@SLLR4594 i see she is moving towards being 'politically correct' over being candid.
मेमं मजदूरी करके या काम करके पैसे भेजने में बात अलग है और किसी का हड़प के बेचने में बात अलग है
before mugals india had a gdp of 32 % in world share and till the end of mugals it came down to 11- 16 % then came british who were even worse for india and its people , and during thIs period india gdp came to 2% , hope you understand know
THANK YOU
Sending earned money to your native country is different than sending nation’s treasure to foreign countries. Nation’s treasure belongs to its people not foreign countries.
🚩🇮🇳💚💛🩵🙏🧡🩵🇮🇳🚩Dear Lubna indian original history jaanate hai. 32 percent GDP mugakl se pahale tha aur onke time me 16 percent houa aur British emperors me 4 percent per chor kar gate
Not Indian muslims. Converted indian Muslims.
29:18 Immigrants bhejte hain families ko. UK govt nahi. Agar UK govt Saudi ko pura paisa bhejne lage aur majority Christians ko dabake rakhhe, unse tax le but muslims se tax na le, to kaisa hoga ? Shashi Tharoor ka wo baat yaad aa gaya, "A burglar comes into your house, stubs his toe, and then you say, there was a sacrifice on both sides. This is not an acceptable argument." Don't try to justify these thieves. achhi history padhane se hindu muslims ko problems nahi,, awareness badhegi. British rule sahi padhate hain idhar, hame problems hoti hai kya angrezo se ? Apka religion, preference, choice jo bhi ho, choro ko defend nahi kiya jaa sakta. Justification galat hai, aur opinion bhi.
I agree fully about not extrapolating. But where does the first extrapolation come from ? and which one is a reaction? The muslims of India primarily , have said they are proud of Aurangzeb , countless muslims name their children Aurangzeb , can you imagine that ma'am? They say they have ruled India for 800 years and they may rule again ! They count themsleves with the brutal invaders and don't accept that even their great grandmothers went through the same atrocious times.
There is a difference between sending remittance to foreign country by a Ruler and by an individual . One should not treat them equal. As a responsibility of ruler, the amount need to be reinvested for well being of local society and economy growth.
Correct a ruler loots money and siphon off to foreign land unlike an individual who invariably sends his hard earned money to his homeland Therefore there can be comparision between two situations .
Let me tell you with greatest possible respect that after first Islamic invasion of Bharat by Mohammad bin Qasim there was a veer from Bharat named Bappa Rawal the Deewan of Mewad who not only defeated Mohammad bin Qasim but also destroyed the entire Muslim umma from Sindh till tooran in present day Iran due to which no Jihadi even tried to attack Bharat for next 480 years and remember this is called real Khauf and on his name only present day Rawal pindi in Pakistan is named.
But hypocrite historians will never talk about this, we don't want hear the stories of these Jihadis and monsters who tried to conquer the world but were not able to conquer their own desire instead we Hindus want to hear history about our great Sanatani heroes Like Rajputs, Marathas, Sikhs, Ahoms, Jatts, Cholas, Cheras, Pandyas, Gurakhas, Reddy and list go on and on , who sacrificed their existence so that we Sanatanis could exist🙏
Folks who migrated to the west and US sent money to their homelands thru sheer dint of hard work, and not by exploiting the local resources. Whereas the Mughals and the British repatriated money by exploiting the local natural and Human Resources.
Lubna Madam ji, aapki research outstanding !!!...go ahead, aapki har video bohot aacha lagta hai👌👌👏👏❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
🙂
I always feel that Justifying middle eastern colonisation is like defending European colonisation. Better both never happened in the first place. Native people should have the right to rule over their nations.
What if Rishi sunak send's British texpayer money to india. Would you say it's normal. They were not immigrants they were rulers.
Madam mughals aur British Bharat mei paisa imandari se business ya kaam karkay kamanay nahi aaye thay unhonay yaha per logo ko atyachar julm karkay loota hai aur unkay desh le gaye hai yaha ka paisa. Unki imandari ki kamai nahi thi, unki kamai loot ki thi.
Aabhi hum log bahar jakar imandari aur mehenath aur unkay rules mei rehekar kamakay latey hai aapnay desh, unko loot kar nahi kamatay hai paisa. Ye farak hai.
HAR HAR MAHADEV 🚩 🙏
JAI HIND JAI BHARAT 🇮🇳
Mughals forced people to convert religion, but the British converted Indian education system to produce clerks who could take orders and stop creative thinking. Unfortunately, the Indian governments continued with the same system post independence and hence there have been no scientific discoveries in India, though the same Indians flourish in research in foreign universities. So the bigger long term damage was done by the British rule. Indian kings never attacked foreign countries, but they were not united in their defense either. They use to join the invaders to avenge the neighboring Indian Kingdom. The invaders and even present day foreign states, take advantage of these schisms that always existed in the Indian society.
Lubna, no Germans or christans say Hitler is great and hero of germany, they consider him as villan, but muslims and their communist sympathizers say mughals are great and portrayed aurangzeb as hero.........this is the sad part
Wo bhi to whi kr rhi hai
Upto 10-11th century Indian GDP was around 32% but then continuous Islamists attacks lead Indian GDP to 24% in peak mughal period around 16th century and around 16-18% during its end ....
Beauty of Hinduism, there is no Hindi country on this earth, but Hinduism is everywhere.
Shyam Sharma CEO of secularism produced excellent videos۔
Ok
Dear Lubna, You are doing a good job for the betterment of humanity. With love and good wishes.
🙂
IMHO ...there is a huge difference between invading a country , looting wealth of that country by atrocities on the native people AND migrating to another country and sending hard earned money back home for family as a earning member of that family. Thanks
🤷♀️
Mem sach bol diya naa maa bhi kheta hai bora insaan ok bye bye tata😅😅😅😅😅😅
Hii🇮🇳🙏🇩🇯🤝✌️🌹🌹
11:45 One janeu (yagyopvit - a thread worn around the neck - rather above the left shoulder and under the right arm) weighs around less than five grams, now calculate the number of people killed according to the weight of janeu mentioned in the video. 75 ×40 = 3000 kg convert in gms = 30 lac grams ÷ 5 gms = 6 lac people approximately
AKTK, Indix Online, The Jaipur Dialogue, The Sham Sharma Show are some good TH-cam channel to know the history of India.
And about GDP go and research by yourself, you will get to know no need to believe anyone. And yes even if your economy got reduced to 16-20 percent from 32 percent then also 16 % was a significant amount to be called as crown it is just a common sense 😂
Please react on the rizwan ahmed face to face video muslims are incompatible with western culture
Please read Biography of Babur, akbar, Jahaangir, Aurangjeb by their Courtiers
Search about Sone ki Chidiya
Before Muslim Invaders 🇮🇳India was Sone ki Chidiya
Sab kar rahe toh iska matlab kya voh achchha ho gaya
good thinking sis 🇳🇵🇳🇵🇳🇵🧘♀️🧘🧘♂️🙏🙏🙏 NAMO BUDDHAY
As you are commenting that during the Mughal Empire whatever GDP was, who were those contributing in the country's GDP ? think and give me answers, they were Indian farmers, artisans and businessmen, or they were foreigners.
I love my brother shyam sharma ❤
Let me tell you about the gdp ratios.. When mughal entered india.. Which is around 1500 ad India had gdp of 32% , when british entered india as east india company in 1600s india's gdp share in world was 25%(by this time mughals were at peak), when mughal kingdom officially ended and official british raj started after 1st war of independence in 1857..indias share of gdp in world was 16%, and in 1947 when india got independence, the global share of indias gdp had dropped to 2-3%...hope this helps
Wah didi wah !
.
atanki Kom muslim MUGHAL ko aap immigrants bol kar kya sabit karna chahti ho ??
.
Aap kis muslim atanki Kom ki support se bol rahi ho? Tumne to Islam chhor dia qki wo Kom atanki hai fir bhi support q???
Bhai inki puri kaum hi esi hai iski ek video na dekhu aj ke bad iski har video ese hoti hai alag hi logic pel rhi hai hmare youtuber inse collab krte hai
Finally she has reacted to a good video instead of partial TH-camrs like Dhruv Rathi
I appreciate it and am proud of the old Bharateey Sanatan Itihas or Indian History ,
Lubna ji nu Satshriakaal 🙏 ❤️ 🇮🇳💪💪
YES GDP WAS 25% WHEN MUGHALS RULED INDIA. BUT THEY BROUGHT IT DOWN FROM 32%
SO THE RIGHT THING TO SAY IS THAT INDIAN GDP WENT DOWN BY 7% UNDER MUGHALS.
MUGHALS WERE A NEGATIVE MEANING A BAD EFFECT ON INDIA.
BRITISH REDUCED INDIAN GDP TO MUCH LESSER AS THEY WERE A INDUSTRIAL NATION BY THEN.
PLEASE TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS.
Lubna , have you thought about doing a video as a reminder, about Tipu Sultan? A Muslim who the Hindus have erased from history .IMO India should never have been divided and it is only a matter of time before India will conquer both Bangladesh and Pakistan for the good of humanity.
@Lubna.Evolve The graph he showed at 10:30 explains the GDP throughout the history. And no one like to whine about the past all the time, the problem is with not acknowledging the carnage and instead whitewashing that. I consider it a slap to the innocent people who lost their lives for nothing.
No doubt, the darkest period of history has been painted by Congress Govt. Which is unfortunately worst and condemnable.
Thanks for exploring dark chapter.
I agree with you in Toto Dear Lubna. It is there with all countries that invaders did something good also in the country they have ruled directly or indirectly. Greatest example is Taj Mahal and others which is even now fetching a lots of revenue by way of tourism. Let the History be histry in its true sense and values.
Nice upload Lubbaji.
❤Hello. Namaskar. Btfl Mrng. Lubna Ji Mm. Tq. So Mch.
You deduced correctly that Mughal rulers were much like any random foreigner living in another country. They remained loyal primarily to their homeland, their native religion, culture and language. But the problem is that in Indian history textbooks they're portrayed as national heroes who totally assimilated into the Indian culture and society. This video appeared to be an attempt to debunk that false narrative. 🥂
Bharat ko 1000 saal se loota gaya hai...mughal toh keval 1500 me aaye lekin woh rulers the jinhone na school banaye na canals banaye agriculture ke liye aur na hi koi research institute banaya..unhone keval bharat ko loota aur agar aurangzeb, babur ki real history padhni hai toh aap Baburnama, Maasir e alamgiri padh lo ki kya kiya aur use woh kitna gloriously bata rahe hai
Yes,.Mohd Glori, Abdali, Mohd Bin Qasim, Durranl, Nizam, Adilshahi, Haider, etc.
Please invite mahleej sarkari on your channel ❤Please invite mahleej sarkari on your channel ❤
25:50 talking about empires coming and going is a lie.
india did not conquer/invade anyone. it did not conquer central asia or china or europe or north america or south america.
What the fk mughalss😅😅
Dear hindus don't be fooled by this woman.. She is Aboodlhiiiii she is just trying that trick (it's not real islam it has nothing to do with islam)
Waiting for you and Sham to have a interview ❤
before muglus 32.65% before britishers 14.7% and after britishers 1% now iit is 3% aprrox
Lubna, all he's telling was about that In Indian texts of education Mughal dynasty must not be glorified as it has been portrayed. The actual facts as shown in this video must be written as it is. That's it.
Mugllo se pahle bharat ki gdp 32 % thi muglo ke aane par 16% huvi or British ke aane par 2% huvi thik he।
Lubna ji, you mentioned that invading empires were common place.
Would you care to comment as to which countries India invaded and conquered over the years?
Lubna ji the point was misinformation taught to indian kids.
India mai British se pehle Portuguese aur french aye the
Great video lubna ji please react to more videos of sham sharma ji ❤
29:22 😂😂😂 and you are comparing the remittances with the looted money sent to foreign countries by Mughals?? I'm sorry but idk why sometimes i really wonder if u have completed yr education from Britain or somewhere else 😂😂. No offense taken none given just think in a little depth about what u just said 😂😂
Lubnaji the gdp ratios are valid coz Britishers came when Mughals were still ruling the subcontinent
Aap ye socho agar arab country ke paas oil na ho to wo aisi lavish life ji sakte the ya apna country chala sakte the khud sahi se jaha jaha inki majority hai waha kai country mai ladai hai apas mai he.
Lubna ji aap bol rahi hai ki har government k acche or bure kam hote hai....i agree 👍
But I have a question:-
Is logic se kya aaj Taliban ki government or england ki government bhi same hai aapke liye? Bcz jaise Taliban ki government kuch galat ker rehi hai toh england ki government bhi toh kuch galat decision le rehi hogi! 🙄
By your thoughts colonialism is normal. It's okay. Religious persecution and othering is normal. I think you are trying to compare oranges to apples. You can see a straight line from Mughal religious persecution to Bangladeshi or Pakistani religious persecution of non muslims. The mindset of mainstream islamic belivers in subcontinent didn't change. I think it's difficult to understand it from a distance.
Key point here is whitewashing of the horrors of the Mughal empire. And the parallels between Arabic colonization and British colonization. But, globally British colonization is accepted as an evil force of the past. Islamic colonization isn't seen in the same adverse light.
It's sad that you have to clarify that you're a human being and you can have opinions. You're growing, you need time and some space to grow.
Exactly
Lubnaji love from India
Was this Video about...purane samay me colonial empires kya karte the sari duniya me? Or purani history ki bhul kar aage badna chahiye?? ( When the Muslims of the subcontinent aggressively display the same atrocious behaviour)
When the British left India, it's global contribution was 4% by the way.
Hi Lubna jaidi 🇮🇳🙏💪♥️🌹👍 thank you share this video 🎉.
Really lubna kamane aur loot mein koi difference nazar nahi aya ? No our first 5 education ministers were madrasa educated hence islamic atrocities were wiped out .
Sahi bole...bht hi ghatiya example..shocked.
Muslims know their history in india. And they are proud of what was done proud of auranzeb . So what do u expect . No gdp went down after mughals , check out statics and india was trading with others before islam came . And no govt. Was not ours they were exploitative and were mughal investing in foreign land ?:it was looted from natives and send to land of ola as offerings not investment for returns .
Lubna,The Mughals history doesn't go very well with India ,yet if you check South East Asia..we are the only place where the minorities grew..check Pakistan and Bangladesh minorities...if they grew or if they have fallen..
Ok
Clearly Lubnaji you need a lot of study and research on this topic becoz what Mughals did to India is far from "normal" 😆
Mughals were invaders and foreigners so it was not normal first thing second we don't mind of any Indian Empire because atleast they will respect your culture and let me tell cultural is intrinsic to Land not to religion.
Lubnaji Ham aapko regular sunte Hain aur bahut Achcha Apne analysis Kiya Hai Apna point of view bataya lekin sirf hinduon ke upar jajiya tax Kyon Lagaya aur Hamare mandiron ko distroy Kyon Kiya Kyon Kiya ISI vajah se ham log unko napasand Karte Hain
25:50 Without History there is no future
Governance achcha sirf hindus hi de sakte hai . Administration chalana ho to Bharat ke sanatani de sakte hai .
React on history of Maratha Empire ❤
Investment or loot mai fark hota h ,jung do ruler's ke beech hoti h , lekin yaha Mughal coman peoples ko maar rahe te mandiro ko lootna unki habit ho sakti h lekin mandir todna kis liye tha , mandir todne mai energy or money dono lgti h to lutere kis liye itna jor lgaa rahe te
Here in India or Bharat,in our Sanatan Dharmik culture and tradition King is the incarnation of God he always indulges in creating wealth, nurturing and protecting his subjects or common people, that is his Dharm,moreover King also thinks that his service is dedicated to his subject that is his also service of GOD. Nothing belongs to him personally whatever it may be any sort of wealth. So therefore here in India cyclical service goes on.
Mughal donated to Iraq, like Saudi Arabia donate money to PAK & Bangaladish
Brother, you're mistaken. Donating money from your own Walt is not the same as stealing someone's Walt and donating money. It's not your money !.... India also donate / allocate funds for its Neighboring countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Sri Lanka etc It's India's money that they are donating not someone else's money.
Lubna ji GDP ka masla nahi hai,, mughal ne jo hajaron mandir tod kar masjid banwaai hindu wo izzat se wapas mang rahe sirf itna masla hai india me
React to the biography of "Swami vivekananda" by 'Vivek bindra'
There is a time gap between the Mughal rule and British and the discrepancy amongst the GDP figures is due to the distortion induced by biased academics. And immigrants sending money back home is entirely different from colonizers looting and plundering. ❤
This is a really stupid logic that Mughals nahi toh koi aur colonizer aa jata. Kya pata waha ki kingdoms waise ke waise rehte.
This vid🎉eo to be very honest is quite balanced and full of noteworthy content.History should be told the way incidents did happen actually in past.So we should take due care that facts are neither misrepresented nor exaggerated .Only a judicious mind can do that basically.
hii lubna,
i think its wrong to compare immigrants sending money to their homes to that of mughals sending money outside india because it was taxpayers money
what if UK's former PM rishi sunak send UK's foreign reserve to india
i dont think it will be appropriate bec taxpayers money should be used on the welfare of the citizens not on the personal interests of rulers or head of states
1 question to you, why do Mughals have to invade India. becoz they dont have any riches in their Land. So saying that India was prosperous under Mughals , Well !! tell u what we dont need ur opinion abt India...
And ur opinions are not gospel words, So I suggest u to mind ur business and not worry abt India or its history. We Indains can take care abt us and u take care abt ur "not so Great Britain"..
Shame on Babar
Attack hote the lekin mandir koi nhi todta tha
Show me any developments by Mughals...wat nonsense 😡😡😡