How to normalize a wavefunction - Real Chemistry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @aingo7158
    @aingo7158 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Hours and hours reading a lot of text book with a tons of confusion solved by your explanation in a coupe of minutes. Thanks you very much

  • @mariaorsic9763
    @mariaorsic9763 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Absolutely outstanding! No one has explained this anywhere near as succinctly.

  • @rominatechera7315
    @rominatechera7315 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I swear I´ve been watching for two days ,videos of 1 hour to understand this, and just now I found out your video. Perfectly explained! Thank you so much!

  • @zander9418
    @zander9418 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the clarification, youtube educators really are something special, you have a gift ty man

  • @aneeketlandepatil8432
    @aneeketlandepatil8432 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are so awesome at explaining this complex concepts with ease.

  • @anjaliyadav1093
    @anjaliyadav1093 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I cannot tell u how easy u made it !!!!!!!!!!!! Definition are so damn confusing !!! Thank u sooo much sir !!!

  • @arcticwolfcub8987
    @arcticwolfcub8987 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    where have you been all this time? my exam is in 2 days i was freaking out but you sir are the lord and savior , thank you sooooooooo much

    • @RealChemistryVideos
      @RealChemistryVideos  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is certainly too high of praise lol. There is only one of those.

    • @arcticwolfcub8987
      @arcticwolfcub8987 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RealChemistryVideos :D

  • @SAJIDALI-od2hf
    @SAJIDALI-od2hf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    excellent explanation: THANK YOU very much

  • @sheemasiddiqui4492
    @sheemasiddiqui4492 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    awsome explanation.
    thankyou

  • @amalnaths8835
    @amalnaths8835 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tnx man u are 10 times better than my professor

  • @teagueolewiler4202
    @teagueolewiler4202 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You explained this perfectly

  • @Selfworthcosmeticsllc
    @Selfworthcosmeticsllc 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow like this was so helpful even though its hours before my test this video saved my grade a little ! thank you!

  • @zeeshanshazi2567
    @zeeshanshazi2567 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent Explanation...

  • @husseinmkangara1682
    @husseinmkangara1682 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was simple and clear ....thank you..!!

  • @matthewburns1585
    @matthewburns1585 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very helpful, thank you!!!!

  • @aprilwright5031
    @aprilwright5031 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU! YOU ARE AMAZING

  • @chenhuawu717
    @chenhuawu717 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    感謝~你解決了我困擾已久的問題

  • @austincurran8025
    @austincurran8025 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have my Quantum Physics Exam in 21 hours and I think you saved my grade lol

  • @baonguyen3484
    @baonguyen3484 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    what happened to the X when you integrate it?

    • @RealChemistryVideos
      @RealChemistryVideos  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because these are definitne integrals (that is they are integrated from 0 to 2 pi) the x goes away. This is true anytime an integral is evaluated at specific x values. Though in this specific case the x actually goes away before we even evaluate it because when you multiple e^-x and e^+x they add together to give you e^0. Does that help?

  • @jo-marierossouw2980
    @jo-marierossouw2980 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    what do you use for normalizing a wavefunction that is real (no i in the function)

    • @RealChemistryVideos
      @RealChemistryVideos  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      When normalizing you always multiply the complex conjugate time the original wavefunction. The complex conjugate is the same as the original wavefunction but with the signs of any i flipped. The i's will (at some point) cancel out and result in a real valued function. This is good because we should never get an imaginary probability haha :)

  • @turki-ln3pi
    @turki-ln3pi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot

  • @RebecaClavijo
    @RebecaClavijo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect video, thank you so much, it really helped me (also your complex numbers video), but by the way, why I am learning this in grade 12 of school? And yet I still have to learn the momentum and solve Schrödinger's equation... :(

  • @kathirvelan4918
    @kathirvelan4918 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why we are taking real part only?

    • @RealChemistryVideos
      @RealChemistryVideos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Kathir,
      Its not that you only keep the real part, its that when you multiple the wavefunction by its complex conjugate you always get a real value. This is also good, because we shouldn't get imaginary probabilities.

    • @kathirvelan4918
      @kathirvelan4918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RealChemistryVideos yes.. Now it is clear.. Thank you for your reply

  • @Hannah-fg4dc
    @Hannah-fg4dc ปีที่แล้ว

    dude thank you

  • @danielgrilli905
    @danielgrilli905 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!!! :)

  • @mustakim2144
    @mustakim2144 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you!

  • @Colonies_Dev
    @Colonies_Dev 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the first time independent solution ive handled xD

  • @chevasit
    @chevasit 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good ..