Yogendra Yadav can explain everything so easily with calm n soft voice... Great work Barkha.. Everyone needs to know how country has been once fooled in the name of Demonetization the same is being done again with ONOE... 🙏🙏
Wah re bhaiyya.. Undertaking the rpocess of democracy is a cost to productivity... waaah kya logic hai.. Poora din haath mein baithke phone dekh ke hilana koi panga nahi hai
Such an intelligent $ comprehensive analysis of the ploy of the ruling party and that too in such a simplistic way, Yogendra Yadav has the brains of a true Professor. And a compliment to our presenter Barkha Dutt also, who complemented in the discussion rather than dragging the speaker from the topic towards an end result that the presenter wants to take for his/her you tube channel.
@@adarshwanderer5704 firstly, are you a supporter of Yogendra and/or his opinions here or are you really interested? Seems like the former. If yes, we can do a mini debate and I can play back the interview and call out the rhetoric, opinions without any basis in facts but disguised as a fact, etc. And, you can debunk my points, if possible!
@@kilohm1853 Give me 3 Counter arguments against him. I support him or not is irrelevant. Since most people could counter his argument give me 3. I beseech.
Sorry, it is relevant as I don’t need to waste my time and energy preparing a list for you when you can’t even start with outlining your own position😊. However, one simple high level one to start with is that the opposition is much stronger now so the Government can’t ram through legislation or make changes (especially such changes that requires constitutional amendments) without having adequate support in Parliament so let it be debated so that pros and cons are discussed and the representatives that we have elected can make a choice if it is good for the nation or not.
Anyway, the BJP was in power in many states; if they really wanted this, they could have dissolved all their state governments a few months before the general election. It would have gotten in sync.
@@RayShreepur why would it need consent? They could have dissolved their state assemblies by themselves before the general election and automatically most elections could have been in sync .
So much clarity he brings on the table on any issues. What a national waste the country is not able to harness specially when their is dearth of such minds
One nation 2 elections. May be 3 elections. Or one electuon a year. Like this ideas will close this discussion. Opposition has to come out with ideas than opposing. Today opposition hate modi so much tht thy oppose everything modi brings. Modi is raising this last 6 years. But opposition came with a idea. Yogendra as usual is crying baby. He just hates modi.
The PM could have done this in his last term! As you say, he has been talking about this for the past 6 years, he could have easily tabled this and gotten it through both houses.
Every day is crores of rupees opportunity for each politicians in power -- Not even one day politicians in power will let go off .. Corruption is biggest attraction to get into power and hence without addressing corruption head-on any reform in election is futile ..
One Nation One Election is not a good suggestion, the country is habitants of multi linguistics with different States having different cultures, if any impractical politicians impose such weird suggestions of this idea to save the costs of election incurred, it’d be a blunder in due course obviously
You guys start in English and all of a sudden switch to Hindi and you forget there are audience who don’t understand or care about Hindi. You need to control ur tendencies to talk in Hindi
One election or two in 5 year is fine as it does help in less chaos, less money and less wastage of resources. Opposing it for some of other reason is pure foolishness.
This is another diversionary tactic from the Supreme Leader to take the attention away from the losses he is bound to face in Haryana and J&K with Jharkhand and Maharashtra to follow.
there are multiple pros, different people with quantify differently but only one serious cons, this will make life difficult for small political parties and may end up making us 2 party system like USA.
Well, the details of this One nation, one election are not available to the public to know their intent. Also, US is a land of immigrants right? with minor red Indian population and their politics is not based on religion. But, where as we're still stuck with religious politics. I believe we as a nation are not matured enough to experiment anything with election until we change the fundamental religion depend politics.
@@Vijai-VpandianReligion based politics is not new to India, and it will never end. US already seeing religious politics, slowly creeping in. Ironically the common factor is Islam ! It’s not just US, it’s more prevalent in Europe as well. This kind of politics will continue as electorate get polarized! Once again just Muslims! If Hindus are polarized like Muslims congress would have never won. 70+ years of multiple elections just paved way for more chaos. So we have to try one nation one election!
@@Vijai-Vpandian If no one tried does not mean India should not try! It’s better to be done with it and move on, instead of constant battle. Do you think BJP will every election if it’s done that way? BJP may think that but it’s impossible to win every election if there is credible opposition!
Bjp is the most selfish party in india. Other parties however incompetent they are will alteast do or say things for people, bjo only does things changes laws only to ensure their return later.
This country deserves a south indian prime minister, a proper administrator someone like jaya Lalitha, the best administrator ever till date she is the undisputed queen of adminstration, not some garbage criminals that we have been seeing for years now. "Esko kya problem hai bhai" "uska IP address nikal"
Basically ONOE is reducing the opportunity for the people to voice their view. We should be going the other way i.e. increase the voter's voice. So this ONOE is anti-democratic. Also I am yet to see what would happen is a party loses majority in either parliament or in assembly. Do we hold an election 1 year after the election or wait for 4 years till the next election can be held.
There is a danger in “one nation one election” making a mandatory policy. Whenever any one of the state governments of Indian union is toppled due to the usual MLA sacking and no confidence motion, again the entire election process for the Loksabha and state elections are to be conducted. This will result in more chaos frequently and much more expenditure than expected. If you look at the past of Indian state and Loksabha elections, it is clear that this happens often. However, If BJP was straight forward in their conviction about this idea, they could have dissolved the BJP governed states,which are going for state elections fe😊w months after Loksabha elections, like Haryana and Maharashtra.
The proposal for one nation, one election is a decision not based on systemic thinking but linear thinking. This is bound to have unintended consequences in the long run on the country and the democratic principles.
Both Barkha and Yogendra hugely benefit from staggered elections. The former is in the business of media and the latter is one of the most sought after psephologist masquerading as a political analyst. Both should recuse themselves from this debate on one nation one election as there is an obvious conflict of interest. Not a single logic which is not of the nature of “value judgement” put forth by Yogendra.
The govt is trying to solve a problem where the inefficiencies are not measured and there might reside an issue where the govt will have tough time to sell this ONOE. People like Yogendra Yadav will always point out the fact that there is no data on how much inefficiency is there due to lack of ONOE.
Local level preferences vs national level...his argument will be proven wrong in J and k elections. At end he is only arguing against the move and not the purpose of move.
Ofcourse there are democracy curtailing impact of this. Upcoming smaller and better parties would not have the financial power to contest in a nationwide election. It just favors the party with money which is the ruling party or party with huge funds.
I think Modi does not want to run this government by asking permission on every issue with his alliance partners. He knows that mid-term elections might be a good thing to go with, so he will keep bringing such so-called constitutional amendments bills that will keep getting rejected due to a lack of a two-thirds majority. Then he will try to push forward a narrative in which he will ask the people of the country, "Look, I am trying to develop the country, but the opposition is creating hurdles and not letting me work, so give me a full majority vote for a full majority." All these waqkt bill, one elections, may be UCB everything will be brought to give new agenda to bring sparks in rights winger workers.
overall, he has no interest in governance at national level...his only aim is national parties should not get even 2% advantage at any cost, let's continue the chaos and increase the chaos so that no one can decide anything
He’s pooh poohing 5000-10000 crores as if he craps out that kind of money every morning…..that’s the financial aspect of it but what about the government always being in election mode. It’s not possible to take hard decisions if the government has to worry about vote counts…
We have national and few state elections today so are you saying the national party have advantage? This is purely a hypothetical situation. Also, there is no such thing as perfect election. There is cost and benefits.
Insufficient explanation on Loss of productivity for politicians, police, army, public if we are always in election mode. What about general negativity which pervades general discourse when various parties are constantly criticizing each other when they are in election mode. What about the productivity loss for the entire country. I listen to Yogendra Y sometime to get some nuggets of information, but he is too biased to provide anything very insightful
Does every critic of the prime minister have to provide their commentary on every single issue in the country or opposition states to be considered legitimate to be heard?
@@EuropaValerie6181It was not an 'Every single issue'. At least acknowledge that it was a heinous crime. Ofcourse rape and murder but more than that the way Mamata government tried to shield perpetrators.
@@bharatdave6288 him acknowledging it or not acknowledging it does not make it a worse or less crime. It idabsolute the worst of the crimes. There is no question of it. And about shielding criminals that is yet to be proven in the courts. No arrest in her administration had been done that directly proves she is involved.it doesnt matter what me and you think, believe pr would like to believe
India needs major reforms. Any ideas and solutions should be debated and discussed instead of using rhetoric. Demonetisation was a sudden move but this is being debated in parliament so why the opposition before the debate?
This guy, Yadav or whatever you call is not a word to reckon, so also this media anchor , both of whom have only one agenda, oppose modi come what may .... People know what you guys are, let the ones blabber but the caravan passes on ...
Yes , knowing is one thing but articulation of that knowledge is real art , he does it wonderfully. If you just transcribe this it's like a well thought out essay.
I think if we can't even hold 4 state elections in one go, how will the election commission conduct elections in the whole country together? It is clear, that this proposal by Mr Modi's government is a ploy to suite BJP's own political needs. As Mr Yadav, said, the EC could easily have clubbed the upcoming state elections together, but they did not. What stops them, or who is stopping them? I would let you come to your own conclusions :)
Yogendra Yadav ji actually is worried he will be jobless for 4 years if ONOE is in place.....hence the grudge lol.....Don't worry sir lot of semiconductor factories opening up you will fit as a good admin guy with part time Political analyst role ....
@@sureshharinathbabu9717 I am not into crossclothing so you enjoy your knickers while drinking whatever pee you want ....... 😏.....by the way if you are opening Knickers factory you can get loan upto 10 lac without collatrals from govt Bank Google PM Vikas Yojna .....thank me later Mr. Suresh Knickers 😆
Yogendra Yadav can explain everything so easily with calm n soft voice... Great work Barkha.. Everyone needs to know how country has been once fooled in the name of Demonetization the same is being done again with ONOE... 🙏🙏
Also, what about the loss of productivity? This is on top of the cost.
Wah re bhaiyya.. Undertaking the rpocess of democracy is a cost to productivity... waaah kya logic hai.. Poora din haath mein baithke phone dekh ke hilana koi panga nahi hai
Yogendra Yadav is the best always. He speaks with Clarity of thought and is very well measured.
Such an intelligent $ comprehensive analysis of the ploy of the ruling party and that too in such a simplistic way, Yogendra Yadav has the brains of a true Professor. And a compliment to our presenter Barkha Dutt also, who complemented in the discussion rather than dragging the speaker from the topic towards an end result that the presenter wants to take for his/her you tube channel.
Ya it tanked in haryana
ohh god!! cant hear this man even for more then 3 minutes when there is no one there to counter him. At least call AIM after him and counter his view.
Most people can counter him but that is why he usually writes opinion pieces and then gets called as a solo interviewee.
What's his counter? If you consider yourself in most people .
@@adarshwanderer5704 firstly, are you a supporter of Yogendra and/or his opinions here or are you really interested? Seems like the former. If yes, we can do a mini debate and I can play back the interview and call out the rhetoric, opinions without any basis in facts but disguised as a fact, etc. And, you can debunk my points, if possible!
@@kilohm1853 Give me 3 Counter arguments against him. I support him or not is irrelevant. Since most people could counter his argument give me 3. I beseech.
Sorry, it is relevant as I don’t need to waste my time and energy preparing a list for you when you can’t even start with outlining your own position😊. However, one simple high level one to start with is that the opposition is much stronger now so the Government can’t ram through legislation or make changes (especially such changes that requires constitutional amendments) without having adequate support in Parliament so let it be debated so that pros and cons are discussed and the representatives that we have elected can make a choice if it is good for the nation or not.
One Sun One Moon One & Only Vishwa Guru always shines a lot..
Very good analysis.
Anyway, the BJP was in power in many states; if they really wanted this, they could have dissolved all their state governments a few months before the general election. It would have gotten in sync.
This needs a consensus from most party. It is only going to benefit India in the long run and productivity of the country willing multiply.
@@RayShreepur why would it need consent? They could have dissolved their state assemblies by themselves before the general election and automatically most elections could have been in sync .
India is too diverse a country.
We need more decentralization of power, not centralization of power.
YY is always succinctly to the point
He is just presenting well-calculated counter for every point. Just to criticise the current govt.
Off course supported by numbers!!
So much clarity he brings on the table on any issues. What a national waste the country is not able to harness specially when their is dearth of such minds
Repent past actions and be Bharatiya now and expose / shame them .if U R able to amend Yogendra yadeo , U will do a great job .
One nation one election is good Modi must resign and hold lok sabha elections now
Then he will surely sweep back to power and Cong will halve it's seats. People are greatly regretting the outcome of 2024 polls.
Why ?. State is independent -- Federal system has its own advantage
One nation 2 elections. May be 3 elections. Or one electuon a year. Like this ideas will close this discussion. Opposition has to come out with ideas than opposing. Today opposition hate modi so much tht thy oppose everything modi brings. Modi is raising this last 6 years. But opposition came with a idea. Yogendra as usual is crying baby. He just hates modi.
The PM could have done this in his last term! As you say, he has been talking about this for the past 6 years, he could have easily tabled this and gotten it through both houses.
@@pp47-04He did it when he felt it is right time
There is no argument against it other than a hypothetical argument about people confusing national and state election
Every day is crores of rupees opportunity for each politicians in power -- Not even one day politicians in power will let go off .. Corruption is biggest attraction to get into power and hence without addressing corruption head-on any reform in election is futile ..
One Nation One Election is not a good suggestion, the country is habitants of multi linguistics with different States having different cultures, if any impractical politicians impose such weird suggestions of this idea to save the costs of election incurred, it’d be a blunder in due course obviously
You guys start in English and all of a sudden switch to Hindi and you forget there are audience who don’t understand or care about Hindi. You need to control ur tendencies to talk in Hindi
Activists will be out of job for 5 years
One election or two in 5 year is fine as it does help in less chaos, less money and less wastage of resources. Opposing it for some of other reason is pure foolishness.
This is another diversionary tactic from the Supreme Leader to take the attention away from the losses he is bound to face in Haryana and J&K with Jharkhand and Maharashtra to follow.
there are multiple pros, different people with quantify differently but only one serious cons, this will make life difficult for small political parties and may end up making us 2 party system like USA.
Which would be a good thing!
Lesser the number of these cast based small parties, the better
Well, the details of this One nation, one election are not available to the public to know their intent. Also, US is a land of immigrants right? with minor red Indian population and their politics is not based on religion. But, where as we're still stuck with religious politics. I believe we as a nation are not matured enough to experiment anything with election until we change the fundamental religion depend politics.
@@Vijai-VpandianReligion based politics is not new to India, and it will never end. US already seeing religious politics, slowly creeping in. Ironically the common factor is Islam ! It’s not just US, it’s more prevalent in Europe as well. This kind of politics will continue as electorate get polarized! Once again just Muslims! If Hindus are polarized like Muslims congress would have never won. 70+ years of multiple elections just paved way for more chaos. So we have to try one nation one election!
@srinum6774 Okay, Do u know the details of One Nation, One election? Any diverse democractic or perhaps any democratic country has tried?
@@Vijai-Vpandian If no one tried does not mean India should not try! It’s better to be done with it and move on, instead of constant battle. Do you think BJP will every election if it’s done that way? BJP may think that but it’s impossible to win every election if there is credible opposition!
Bjp is the most selfish party in india. Other parties however incompetent they are will alteast do or say things for people, bjo only does things changes laws only to ensure their return later.
This country deserves a south indian prime minister, a proper administrator someone like jaya Lalitha, the best administrator ever till date she is the undisputed queen of adminstration, not some garbage criminals that we have been seeing for years now. "Esko kya problem hai bhai" "uska IP address nikal"
Basically ONOE is reducing the opportunity for the people to voice their view. We should be going the other way i.e. increase the voter's voice. So this ONOE is anti-democratic. Also I am yet to see what would happen is a party loses majority in either parliament or in assembly. Do we hold an election 1 year after the election or wait for 4 years till the next election can be held.
There is a danger in “one nation one election” making a mandatory policy. Whenever any one of the state governments of Indian union is toppled due to the usual MLA sacking and no confidence motion, again the entire election process for the Loksabha and state elections are to be conducted. This will result in more chaos frequently and much more expenditure than expected. If you look at the past of Indian state and Loksabha elections, it is clear that this happens often. However, If BJP was straight forward in their conviction about this idea, they could have dissolved the BJP governed states,which are going for state elections fe😊w months after Loksabha elections, like Haryana and Maharashtra.
Can you ask genius Yogendra what is wrong in having one election . I do not hear why not other than he thinks it is wrong
Thought of regular elections keeps Govt on their toes & prevents them from taking citizens for granted.
Narrative control and spin doctrine 👍👍
The proposal for one nation, one election is a decision not based on systemic thinking but linear thinking. This is bound to have unintended consequences in the long run on the country and the democratic principles.
Both Barkha and Yogendra hugely benefit from staggered elections. The former is in the business of media and the latter is one of the most sought after psephologist masquerading as a political analyst. Both should recuse themselves from this debate on one nation one election as there is an obvious conflict of interest. Not a single logic which is not of the nature of “value judgement” put forth by Yogendra.
Congress never reform laws which will be good for the country if other party do they become jealous. What the hell it is.
one year one news hour, can save a lot of money time and energy
Modi Zindabad
The govt is trying to solve a problem where the inefficiencies are not measured and there might reside an issue where the govt will have tough time to sell this ONOE. People like Yogendra Yadav will always point out the fact that there is no data on how much inefficiency is there due to lack of ONOE.
Local level preferences vs national level...his argument will be proven wrong in J and k elections.
At end he is only arguing against the move and not the purpose of move.
Ofcourse there are democracy curtailing impact of this. Upcoming smaller and better parties would not have the financial power to contest in a nationwide election. It just favors the party with money which is the ruling party or party with huge funds.
Sad to see that a former President of India has been reduced to becoming Modi's chatu!
I think Modi does not want to run this government by asking permission on every issue with his alliance partners. He knows that mid-term elections might be a good thing to go with, so he will keep bringing such so-called constitutional amendments bills that will keep getting rejected due to a lack of a two-thirds majority. Then he will try to push forward a narrative in which he will ask the people of the country, "Look, I am trying to develop the country, but the opposition is creating hurdles and not letting me work, so give me a full majority vote for a full majority."
All these waqkt bill, one elections, may be UCB everything will be brought to give new agenda to bring sparks in rights winger workers.
The trend of Haryana on TV confirms YoYa is a congress stooge. Don't call him on your channel.
What about the business losses in the last three to six months prior to elections?
For Yogendra Yadav fewer elections - Lesser Income. What else is the downside...
Congress got only 99 this is also by cheating katakat now they are expecting more katakat what a hell
This guy Yogendra thrives on negativity ….and we have many fanning this
overall, he has no interest in governance at national level...his only aim is national parties should not get even 2% advantage at any cost, let's continue the chaos and increase the chaos so that no one can decide anything
No doubt this is barka show hahahaha - Yadav from when did he become prominent opposition speaker
What is the proof that people will vite in the same way? Where is the empirical evidence?
Hurt caused by demonstration to black money walas still lingers. And stone pelters are jobless.
IF IT IS NOT BROKEN DON'T SUGGEST FIXING IT! IT IS WORKING FINE IN OUR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.
सारे विषय का एक्सपर्ट महामहिम श्री योगेंद्र यादव जी आ थू 😝
I am tired of watching Sharia Salim. Sorry Barkha, I am loging you off!
One nation,2 election
2 Panautis 😂😂😂😂😂
One nation one election will be a reality
He’s pooh poohing 5000-10000 crores as if he craps out that kind of money every morning…..that’s the financial aspect of it but what about the government always being in election mode.
It’s not possible to take hard decisions if the government has to worry about vote counts…
We have national and few state elections today so are you saying the national party have advantage? This is purely a hypothetical situation. Also, there is no such thing as perfect election. There is cost and benefits.
Does this guy even has one item that much did it right??
Mam why yogendra yadav. Who has hardly won any election..
Insufficient explanation on Loss of productivity for politicians, police, army, public if we are always in election mode. What about general negativity which pervades general discourse when various parties are constantly criticizing each other when they are in election mode. What about the productivity loss for the entire country. I listen to Yogendra Y sometime to get some nuggets of information, but he is too biased to provide anything very insightful
Where is Yogendra Yadav's comment on RG Kar rape case in Kolkata ? He is silent. Because he had shook hands with his favourite didi
Does every critic of the prime minister have to provide their commentary on every single issue in the country or opposition states to be considered legitimate to be heard?
@@EuropaValerie6181It was not an 'Every single issue'. At least acknowledge that it was a heinous crime. Ofcourse rape and murder but more than that the way Mamata government tried to shield perpetrators.
@@bharatdave6288 him acknowledging it or not acknowledging it does not make it a worse or less crime. It idabsolute the worst of the crimes. There is no question of it.
And about shielding criminals that is yet to be proven in the courts. No arrest in her administration had been done that directly proves she is involved.it doesnt matter what me and you think, believe pr would like to believe
"If pill 💊 would do, why go for an open heart surgery?"
A tantalizing question indeed.
I'm better informed after listening. 😊
You are not
India needs major reforms. Any ideas and solutions should be debated and discussed instead of using rhetoric. Demonetisation was a sudden move but this is being debated in parliament so why the opposition before the debate?
Multirole wolf yogendra yadav necer supports bharat consolidation.
Gomukhvagrha
Mr. Yadavs start is not objective at all, his bias is evident and articulated.
Brilliant elucidation by Prof .Yogendra yadav . Ji.
Illuminating exposition
Brown Thomas Rodriguez Karen Walker Mary
Annualized saving
Reduce the number of days from 15 to 7 days.
This guy, Yadav or whatever you call is not a word to reckon, so also this media anchor , both of whom have only one agenda, oppose modi come what may ....
People know what you guys are, let the ones blabber but the caravan passes on ...
people's talk, he was well on taken charge the characters of rogue drug shankar position.., isn't..,
This guy Yogendra Yadav doesn't have any work. So keeps jumping to all TH-cam channels, gives some debate and gets paid.
THIS is the stupidest idea. We the people need multiple areas to voice opinions. multiple imes.
Any diverse democratic country tried that?
Yogandar yadav is not India's leader to guide us.
Angolanjeevi
Wonderful analysis by Yogendra Yadav.
Another hypocratic chair
Are yarr ye You tube adds nye pareshan kr ke rakha hain 😢😢😢😢
You cannot argue with Yogendra yadav. He knows what he is talking about.
He fools u
Yes , knowing is one thing but articulation of that knowledge is real art , he does it wonderfully. If you just transcribe this it's like a well thought out essay.
He is clueless 😅
@@PrateekAnandspet😂😂
To push SEBI issue background this jumla.
Modi is a sultan, a tuwlaq
Good discussion
I think if we can't even hold 4 state elections in one go, how will the election commission conduct elections in the whole country together? It is clear, that this proposal by Mr Modi's government is a ploy to suite BJP's own political needs. As Mr Yadav, said, the EC could easily have clubbed the upcoming state elections together, but they did not. What stops them, or who is stopping them? I would let you come to your own conclusions :)
Why not. One nation one election. Make it bank holidays. Will be a historic day for the biggest democracy. Hope soon 🤞
stupidest idea.
Gol gol kitna ghuma ke bol raha hain… end main kuch bhi meaningful bola!
Yogendra yadav honestly ur a propogandist
Saleeeem
This is what you are left ....to talk with
Common Barkha ....
He is biggest scamster .
Yogendra Yadav ji actually is worried he will be jobless for 4 years if ONOE is in place.....hence the grudge lol.....Don't worry sir lot of semiconductor factories opening up you will fit as a good admin guy with part time Political analyst role ....
Yes gomuthra nagpur half knickers, we are opening a factory in nagpur for making half knickers bring your family and join it
😂
@@sureshharinathbabu9717 I am not into crossclothing so you enjoy your knickers while drinking whatever pee you want ....... 😏.....by the way if you are opening Knickers factory you can get loan upto 10 lac without collatrals from govt Bank Google PM Vikas Yojna .....thank me later Mr. Suresh Knickers 😆
What a great point in supporting this disaster. Pls come up with such points again
.
Mam aap itni achhi journalist ho ...Is ghatiya aadmi ko limelight mat do aap plz...
Arrey Dumb Salim Yaadav if Initial 20 years Coincidentally it could happen then why cant we do it in a planned manner?
34:04 seriously 😂 ?
Modi Zindabad!