Yeh banda Kamal ka narrative hh iska lecture sunna k baad sari smajh ah jati hh koi b point miss nahi hota .... Iska Raymond Williams par lecture nahi hhn tu proper samajh nahi ahi....
Sidney begins his defense of poetry by noting that poetry was the first of the arts, coming before philosophy and history. Indeed, many of the famous classical philosophers and historians wrote in poetry, and even those who wrote in prose, like Plato and Herodotus, wrote poetically-that is, they used poetic style to come up with philosophical allegories, in the case of Plato, or to supply vivid historical details, in the case of Herodotus. Indeed, without borrowing from poetry, historians and philosophers would never have become popular, Sidney claims. One can get some indication of the respect in which poets were held in the ancient world by examining the names they were given in Latin and Greek, vates and poietes. Vates means “seer” or “prophet,” and in the classical world, poetry was considered to convey important knowledge about the future. Poietes means maker, and this title reflects the fact that poets, like God, create new and more perfect realities using their imaginations. Sidney then moves to the proposition, where offers a definition of poetry as an art of imitation that teaches its audience through “delight,” or pleasure. In its ability to embody ideas in compelling images, poetry is like “a speaking picture.” Sidney then specifies that the kind of poetry he is interested in is not religious or philosophical, but rather that which is written by “right poets.” This ideal form of poetry is not limited in its subject matter by what exists in nature, but instead creates perfect examples of virtue that, while maybe not real, is well-suited to teaching readers about what it means to be good. Poetry is a more effective teacher of virtue than history or philosophy because, instead of being limited to the realm of abstract ideas, like philosophy, or to the realm of what has actually happened, like history, poetry can present perfect examples of virtue in a way best suited to instruct its readers. The poet can embody the philosopher’s “wordish descriptions” of virtue in compelling characters or stories, which are more pleasurable to read and easier to understand and remember, like Aesop’s Fables. The poet should therefore be considered the “right popular philosopher,” since with perfect and pleasurable examples of virtue, like Aeneas from Virgil’s Aeneid, poetry can “move” readers to act virtuously. Reading poetry about virtue, Sidney writes, is like taking a “medicine of cherries.” Following the classical structure from this examination to the refutation, Sidney rebuts the criticisms made of poetry by “poet-haters.” Sidney outlines the four most serious charges against poetry: that poetry is a waste of time, that the poet is a liar, that poetry corrupts our morals, and that Plato banished poets from his ideal city in the Republic. He highlights that all of these objections rest on the power of poetry to move its audience, which means that they are actually reasons to praise poetry. For if poetry is written well, it has enormous power to move its audience to virtue. Following a short peroration, or conclusion, in which he summarizes the arguments he has made, Sidney devotes the final portion of his essay to a digression on modern English poetry. There is relatively little modern English poetry of any quality, Sidney admits. However, is not because there is anything wrong with English or with poetry, but rather with the absurd way in which poets write poems and playwrights write plays. Poets must be educated to write more elegantly, borrowing from classical sources without apishly imitating them, as so many poets, orators, and scholars did in Sidney’s time. For English is an expressive language with all the apparatus for good literature, and it is simply waiting for skillful writers to use it. Sidney brings “An Apology for Poetry” to a close on this hopeful note-but not before warning readers that, just as poetry has the power to immortalize people in verse, so too does it have the power to condemn others to be forgotten by ignoring them altogether. The critics of poetry should therefore take Sidney’s arguments seriously. Previous Intro
Every literature student here in Pakistan recommends this channel and goes for the videos of Kapil Sir to understand literature easily . I'm the student of the prestigious language university of Pakistan and the students of our uni first watch the videos Kapil sir and then we take our lectures to understand things easily and I proudly say this that Kapil sir's teaching way is more better than our highly qualified professors . You are truly a gem Sir❤💎 Huge respect from Pakistan ❤
Kindly add some more details specially about Giovanni Pietro Pugliano. Viewers should also concern with learner's hub videos as their videos together will give you lot more knowledge
How did u know man....... Tomorrow is our 1st lecture of this book and u just uploaded it Really i m shocked that how did u came to know Amazing Great work❤️ Luv from🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
keep on posting videos I got 3.7/4 cgpa in my 1st smester just because of you... Thank you so0 much. Even though I m now addicted to your videos more than my teacher's lectures. & have been watching your all video since before this online study schedule. Your videos really help me in understanding the concepts.
Wow Sir..... such an amazing work plus explanation.... Made my day .... keep flowing like this Sir💞 May Allah (SWT) Bless you and fulfil all your needs you wish for❤
Sir thank you thank you so so much !! 🙏🙏🙏🥺 I seriously feel I want to learn the way you teach The ability to teach in you is God gifted But seriously sir thank you 🙏🤍
Hello sir I have a one confusion about it ......Philip Sidney belongs to Elizabethan age but Stephen gooson belongs to puritan age ... So at that time Sidney was not alive so how is it possible that he responded on the accuses of poetry to puritan critics
May lots of love and pleasures run with you ahead in life!! Horrible circumstances go astray in the coming decades!! Keep endeavouring to deliver very efficient sort of stuff as usual. Lots of love 💕 from Pakistan towards the whole members of team on this very portal!!!!
Aap k vedio itni achi nhe hai zeyda Urdu hai but ye TU literature k hai .. Tum to aik picture Laga k bateen kartay hai pta ni q like kartay hai AP vedio log
Yeh banda Kamal ka narrative hh iska lecture sunna k baad sari smajh ah jati hh koi b point miss nahi hota .... Iska Raymond Williams par lecture nahi hhn tu proper samajh nahi ahi....
Badnaam Hungay Tu Kiya Naam Nhi huga ! Stephen Gosson 😅
Kya bat h😂
Your method of teaching is very good...stay blessed respect from Pakistan
P
Sahi baat
Thank You, Sir
After 2 Days is our exam and you uploaded this video
How do you know sir? this will be helpful for us
Amazing work
Thanks for the wonderful explanation, you made it seem so easy🙂
Sidney begins his defense of poetry by noting that poetry was the first of the arts, coming before philosophy and history. Indeed, many of the famous classical philosophers and historians wrote in poetry, and even those who wrote in prose, like Plato and Herodotus, wrote poetically-that is, they used poetic style to come up with philosophical allegories, in the case of Plato, or to supply vivid historical details, in the case of Herodotus. Indeed, without borrowing from poetry, historians and philosophers would never have become popular, Sidney claims. One can get some indication of the respect in which poets were held in the ancient world by examining the names they were given in Latin and Greek, vates and poietes. Vates means “seer” or “prophet,” and in the classical world, poetry was considered to convey important knowledge about the future. Poietes means maker, and this title reflects the fact that poets, like God, create new and more perfect realities using their imaginations.
Sidney then moves to the proposition, where offers a definition of poetry as an art of imitation that teaches its audience through “delight,” or pleasure. In its ability to embody ideas in compelling images, poetry is like “a speaking picture.” Sidney then specifies that the kind of poetry he is interested in is not religious or philosophical, but rather that which is written by “right poets.” This ideal form of poetry is not limited in its subject matter by what exists in nature, but instead creates perfect examples of virtue that, while maybe not real, is well-suited to teaching readers about what it means to be good. Poetry is a more effective teacher of virtue than history or philosophy because, instead of being limited to the realm of abstract ideas, like philosophy, or to the realm of what has actually happened, like history, poetry can present perfect examples of virtue in a way best suited to instruct its readers. The poet can embody the philosopher’s “wordish descriptions” of virtue in compelling characters or stories, which are more pleasurable to read and easier to understand and remember, like Aesop’s Fables. The poet should therefore be considered the “right popular philosopher,” since with perfect and pleasurable examples of virtue, like Aeneas from Virgil’s Aeneid, poetry can “move” readers to act virtuously. Reading poetry about virtue, Sidney writes, is like taking a “medicine of cherries.”
Following the classical structure from this examination to the refutation, Sidney rebuts the criticisms made of poetry by “poet-haters.” Sidney outlines the four most serious charges against poetry: that poetry is a waste of time, that the poet is a liar, that poetry corrupts our morals, and that Plato banished poets from his ideal city in the Republic. He highlights that all of these objections rest on the power of poetry to move its audience, which means that they are actually reasons to praise poetry. For if poetry is written well, it has enormous power to move its audience to virtue.
Following a short peroration, or conclusion, in which he summarizes the arguments he has made, Sidney devotes the final portion of his essay to a digression on modern English poetry. There is relatively little modern English poetry of any quality, Sidney admits. However, is not because there is anything wrong with English or with poetry, but rather with the absurd way in which poets write poems and playwrights write plays. Poets must be educated to write more elegantly, borrowing from classical sources without apishly imitating them, as so many poets, orators, and scholars did in Sidney’s time. For English is an expressive language with all the apparatus for good literature, and it is simply waiting for skillful writers to use it. Sidney brings “An Apology for Poetry” to a close on this hopeful note-but not before warning readers that, just as poetry has the power to immortalize people in verse, so too does it have the power to condemn others to be forgotten by ignoring them altogether. The critics of poetry should therefore take Sidney’s arguments seriously.
Previous
Intro
Every literature student here in Pakistan recommends this channel and goes for the videos of Kapil Sir to understand literature easily . I'm the student of the prestigious language university of Pakistan and the students of our uni first watch the videos Kapil sir and then we take our lectures to understand things easily and I proudly say this that Kapil sir's teaching way is more better than our highly qualified professors . You are truly a gem Sir❤💎
Huge respect from Pakistan ❤
Our Teacher sends his video in Class group 💚🇵🇰
Sahi
Per inki video per farie queen book 1 ha baki book mjh mil nai rahy ha ....AgR ksi ko PATA ho to link share kary
Awww.. ap kitne acche ho mai pichle 2 din se apka ye video dhund rhi hu kal mera exam h. 😅. Thank u sir. Mere exam ki laj rakh li apne🙏
Respect from pakistan. Sir ur way of explaining is so clear. Thanku
Love from Pakistan,,,,,, thanks dear sir your way of explaining is very clear 🤟🏻🤟🏻
Your explanations are always adorable and too easy to understand any piece of literature👌keep ur efforts up sir👍👍👍
Kindly add some more details specially about Giovanni Pietro Pugliano. Viewers should also concern with learner's hub videos as their videos together will give you lot more knowledge
Sir aap bahut achha explain karte hai bs ek request h ki aap book ke pure chijo ko brief me btaya kijiye matlab complete summary please sir
Kuch chije missing rahti hai
To batao kya missing h
Acha adhura mat batao
@@initusahu😅😅
Thank you so much sir. I pass in all my exams just because of you. More power to you.
How did u know man.......
Tomorrow is our 1st lecture of this book and u just uploaded it
Really i m shocked that how did u came to know
Amazing Great work❤️
Luv from🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
Tomorrow is my semester exam. This is an important topic. He uploaded in right time😅
@@sayandutta6014 yes offcouce
keep on posting videos I got 3.7/4 cgpa in my 1st smester just because of you... Thank you so0 much. Even though I m now addicted to your videos more than my teacher's lectures. & have been watching your all video since before this online study schedule. Your videos really help me in understanding the concepts.
You need to study hard , that's less
You're awesome mayn!
Allah pak apko har muqam pr qamyabi ata frmaain
Thank you so much for make this topics so easy to understand. 🤗
Thank you sir for revealing relevant facts about this important peace of work 🙏 it's extremely helpful video for all English net aspirations
"Piece" spelling is correct for this
Wow Sir..... such an amazing work plus explanation.... Made my day .... keep flowing like this Sir💞
May Allah (SWT) Bless you and fulfil all your needs you wish for❤
Aap toh mere Profesir se bhi achha Padgate hoo
Sir thank you thank you so so much !! 🙏🙏🙏🥺
I seriously feel I want to learn the way you teach
The ability to teach in you is God gifted
But seriously sir thank you 🙏🤍
Very nice video Sir I just finished reading the book.this video summarises the whole book in Just 8mins .
Thank u sir... It's a helpful video for exam
In Defence of poetry which work does Sydney recommended as good examples of poesy
Plz tell an apology to poetry comes under which type of criticism
A-theoritical
B-comparative
C-historical. Plz answer
Sir plz make a video on The Time machine by H. G. Wells
Hello sir I have a one confusion about it ......Philip Sidney belongs to Elizabethan age but Stephen gooson belongs to puritan age ...
So at that time Sidney was not alive so how is it possible that he responded on the accuses of poetry to puritan critics
You are one type of angel for us....thank you
You are very helpful kind of person, because of you my syllabus gone done, lot of love from chhattisgarh, thank you sir 🙏
Amazing explanation. Sir please start covering other texts included in Delhi University syllabus
Great Sir love from Pakistan
I am very great ful to u sir I always watch your vedio for study in English
Bundle of thanks...Allah give you more knowledge and strength
Thanks for the video...
Love from Pakistan
Today's my exam 😁 ......and this will be very useful for me ....thank you sir
You are the greatest one to save us from tough Exam
No words to describe how thankful we are❤❤🎉🎉😊😊
Tommorow our sir will discuss on this topic...and u just uploaded it...man u nailed it...just awesome... Thank you so much...
U explanation is always in a lucid manner.. Great..
Sir plz provide a vdo about Astrophel and Stella plzzzzz sir 🙏🙏
Sir plz give us material of this topic in written form . Plz me from Pakistan
Love from Mathura ❤️💜💜❤️🔥
Thanx for providing us plenty of materials
Sir b.a. 3rd year ki six semester me help kro jithne objective nikalteh onikal Kar ke do
Thanks for this video. As net exam is on 6th December. Please give some tips for revision.. And make video on English in India, evolution and future..
yes
Pls pls share the video lecture on ode to adversity for my exams ..it's a humble request 🙏🙏
The morality of poetry means what? universality of poetry or
Defense of poetry or
Function of poetry?
Please, Sir. make my conception clear.
Sir...U r explaining in an amazingly lucid style n I pray n hope u do some videos on some important works in Cultural Studies🙏🙏
Thank you so much sir ...you are doing a really good work 😊
Sir aap pelase sleep potary far vedio banavo
May lots of love and pleasures run with you ahead in life!! Horrible circumstances go astray in the coming decades!! Keep endeavouring to deliver very efficient sort of stuff as usual. Lots of love 💕 from Pakistan towards the whole members of team on this very portal!!!!
Thank u so much Sir
You helped me alot by giving an understanding of AAFP.
God Bless You.♥
Thanks a lot for every lessons.. I'm From Bangladesh and always follow your classes..
Sir could you please make video on Eve's apology in defence of women by Aemilia plzzzz plzzzz sir it's humble request
Yes please!
Baray achay sy samjhatay ho Bhae AP
Aik lecture 1 month main ma composite ki tayari k hawalay sy bhi video bna bna dyn plz
Plzzz plzzz anyone help me ..form where i can get previous year questions paper of BA VBU HAZARIBAGH university.
Want to contact you. How can i?
Wanna learn literature
@@minahilmudusar190 wanna my me lo
The best boss.. But plz think about MCQ&Short Q&A.. Videos.. Spl - VVI:point based Q&A. Tnq
Phillip Sydney 's views on An Apology for Poetry.
इस question के answer मे पूरी literary type describe करनी है ना sir?
Please help me sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Thank you, sir.
Thank you so much Sir your all videos are very helpful for me
Thank u sir for explanation
helpful 🙏
Thanku sir
Sir please please please make a video on the novel shanti (summary) I got exam 😭
Good sir. Thank you so much. 🙏🙏🙏
Love from pakistan
Tnxxx sir
Sir pls do make a video on Astrophel and Stella
Thnk you xo much sir
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Ma whole syllabus is here
Sir ap plz Greek and Roman ,or English criticism k m c q par videos banawo jalde
Aap k vedio itni achi nhe hai zeyda Urdu hai but ye TU literature k hai .. Tum to aik picture Laga k bateen kartay hai pta ni q like kartay hai AP vedio log
Very helpful video sir 👍
In which work Plato has used verse/poetic form? Republic, as far as I know, is in prose. 🤔
Best explanation Ever 💯
Greate explanation, thanks sir.
Make a video on The countess of Pembroke ARCADIA by SIDNEY
There is any video on “Stephen Gossan : From the school of Abuse” ??
Kapil really you are Kapil muni creator of Sankhya,thoudands year ago .
Sir u r amazing ur videos are really helpful
We blessed🤟
Sir can you upload sir Patrick spens summary As soon as possible. Tmrw i have exam 😭
Sir pls make a video on Defence of poesie...pls make
Sir your method of teaching is very appreciative 🎉. From Pakistan
Sir what should be the possible questions of Philip Sydney for criticism paper???
Sir what were the chief defect in Philip sidny AN APOLOGY OF POISY....sir plz tell me..
Your way of explanation is best. Sir please share a lecture on the essay of dramatic poessy...
Robert Louis Stevenson ki prose upload kariye please
Sir please odour of Chrysanthemum by dh Lawrence ki summary video banao please please please please please please sir.
Salute to uu sir… you are the one best teacher
plzz make vdieo on ...The Praise Of Folly...plzzz🙏🙏
You dont tell the 7 parts of the essay by which philip sidney argues the charges??
Sir please astrophel and stella ke upar bhi video upload kijiye 🙏🙏🙏
Thanku so much
Plz upload a video on "Oroonoko" by Aphra Behn..
Plato called poetry "pack/mother of lies" why.?
Nice sir
Thanks sir you are great in this world