" Visual Harmony Standards" and " Visual Authority"? The case of " The Canal Street Condo Association Vs Kennedy" ( Cook County Illinois Circuit Court et al) Provides Precedence that a " View" is not an intrinsic right of property ownership, thus such standards have no legal standing, and the amount of damage to his truck, equipment, and property, the denial of access, and Arson raises all of this to the felony level the board, its, president, and their backers are guilty of criminal conspiracy against him, the arson a nd threats give him every right to use force to protect his property ( meaning, that any future intruders could be legally met with physical force) I would make the subjects behind all this to pay a few million dollars ( the damage to his truck tires wind shield and interior alone would amount to thousands of dollars, and the damage to his equipment, fences, and barn would add up to thousands more) plus his legal costs, pain and suffering and illegal restraint and false imprisonment should mean punitive damages) and a good long stretch in the state penitentiary would be just punishment and serve as a warning to others not to mess with farmers!
This attitude is what makes people like the Claims Adjuster.
" Visual Harmony Standards" and " Visual Authority"? The case of " The Canal Street Condo Association Vs Kennedy" ( Cook County Illinois Circuit Court et al) Provides Precedence that a " View" is not an intrinsic right of property ownership, thus such standards have no legal standing, and the amount of damage to his truck, equipment, and property, the denial of access, and Arson raises all of this to the felony level the board, its, president, and their backers are guilty of criminal conspiracy against him, the arson a nd threats give him every right to use force to protect his property ( meaning, that any future intruders could be legally met with physical force) I would make the subjects behind all this to pay a few million dollars ( the damage to his truck tires wind shield and interior alone would amount to thousands of dollars, and the damage to his equipment, fences, and barn would add up to thousands more) plus his legal costs, pain and suffering and illegal restraint and false imprisonment should mean punitive damages) and a good long stretch in the state penitentiary would be just punishment and serve as a warning to others not to mess with farmers!