Learn About Artefex Copper Panels

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @FAKEtrailers2
    @FAKEtrailers2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very Kool, great video. Im glad traditional things like this are still produced, with modern materialism in mind

  • @rocksartpainting3817
    @rocksartpainting3817 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This painting is very beautiful, your technique is very unique and very accurate! I also draw scenes on the rock and share them on my channel, but I really like your paintings. Thanks for this beautiful sharing ...

    • @ArtefexArt
      @ArtefexArt  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much 😀

  • @red2744
    @red2744 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    these are really good i tried them but way to expensive for my taste

    • @ArtefexArt
      @ArtefexArt  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the feedback!

  • @Fromard
    @Fromard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A 16" x 20" is $102. I guess it's worth it if you have a specific need.

  • @KpxUrz5745
    @KpxUrz5745 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's an interesting product but in today's world, I doubt many artists can find a legitimate use for it. Also, I do not like the way that the ad artist is working or holds her brush. Rembrandt did a few small paintings on copper, but we do not encounter many Rembrandts.

  • @Allusionary
    @Allusionary 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whoever wrote the closed captions for this video, obviously had zero understanding of the subject. He or she butchered the words to the point of turning it into a pathetic farce. Worse, was the person who approved it. Artefex would do well to re-edit their promo.

    • @stephena.darwin9715
      @stephena.darwin9715 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think the closed captions are generated by the same kind of AI that we use when typing by voice. Not always accurate

    • @Allusionary
      @Allusionary 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephena.darwin9715 Yesterday I just encountered another example of atrocious closed captions, so I believe you that AI is to blame. However, my question is, can not the owner of a horribly-captioned video proofread and then correct the errors, or are they "set in stone"? It's horribly distracting from the message.