Should Elon Musk have stopped Ukraine attacking Russia? | If You’re Listening
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2023
- In September last year, Elon Musk refused to let the Ukrainian military use his Starlink satellites to attack a Russian fleet.
Musk jumped on Twitter and posted "Starlink is meant for peaceful use only".
So how did we get into a situation where Elon Musk gets to personally decide whether a Ukrainian military operation succeeds or fails?
And was he justified in refusing to help?
Matt Bevan takes a look. Subscribe: ab.co/3yqPOZ5
ABC News In-depth takes you deeper on the big stories, with long-form journalism from Four Corners, Foreign Correspondent, Australian Story, Planet America and more, and explainers from ABC News Video Lab.
Watch more ABC News content ad-free on ABC iview: ab.co/2OB7Mk1
For more from ABC News, click here: ab.co/2kxYCZY
Get breaking news and livestreams from our ABC News channel: / newsonabc
Like ABC News on Facebook: / abcnews.au
Follow ABC News on Instagram: / abcnews_au
Follow ABC News on Twitter: / abcnews
Note: In most cases, our captions are auto-generated.
#ABCNewsIndepth #ABCNewsAustralia
Comments allowed on an ABC story, how refreshing!
Comments are allowed on all videos on the ABC In-Depth channel to my knowledge
the always allow them on these kinds of videos. general news clips they don't. they've done that (as many other news outlets have done) since the laws changed to make them responsible for the comments people make on their videos, and they don't have a big enough moderating team to be across all the videos that go up. Liberals brought that in a couple of years ago.
@@veronicamcghie5238not the hot topics
I do see quite a few shadow blocked comments tho. Maybe just the appearance of honest dialog.
Starlink is a private company? Using their infrastructure for war goes against Star-link’s terms and conditions. A private company can choose not to have their services used for war. It’s that simple…
No, it is not that simple. Russia has defied the international community, the international concept of law, by invading a neighboring country. Russia invaded because Putin wants to re-constitute the Russian Empire. He denies that the Ukrainians are a sovereign people. Putin denies that the Urkainians are a people. He is a racist. Putin denies that Ukraine is a sovereign country. He says that Ukraine is really Russia. The Ukrainians are fighting for their survival, literally. I suggest your read about the Nuhremburg Trial.
NASA puls the plug and Elon is homeless. No way his companies are private.
Not history buff would reference Pearl Harbour. The distinct feature about Pearl Harbour attack was that the US was not at war with Japan. This is completely different
I think it was sarcasm saying he was a history buff.
@@neemnyima2166 the analysis of escalation is legitimate, but any comparisons specifically to Pearl Harbour are clueless
Yeah nah. The US had been fighting Japan for years before Perl Harbor. Both economically and physically in China. What did they expect Japan to do? Nothing?
You folk in the hair splitting department carry on..
~laughs~
So is the US at war with Russia? I don't think so. The policy of aiding Ukraine resistance
is aided by Musk's Starlink.
US was supplying China with squadrons of air craft that flew missions against japan for nearly a year before Pearl Harbor. (told by actual pilots and ground crew mostly from March AFB area)
This is not even an intelligent question. As a US citizen, he had an obligation to obey US law. US sanctions prevented him from providing service too Crimea. It is also illegal for a private US citizen to participate in a major act of war that could start WW III. That is supposed to be the responsibility of congress. The president is not supposed to start wars on his own. Musk certainly isn't. Russia would be able to tell if Musk had taken part in a Peal Harbor like attack on its Black Sea fleet and would likely retaliate against Musk's facilities and ,possibly, US forces. It was both unlawful and immoral for Musk to do this. Biden needs congressional approval to commit an act of war against Russia unless Russia attacks the US.
It’s not an act of war, it’s enabling Ukraine to retake its occupied territories. It’s no different than supplying arms and ammo. His decision allowed the fleet to engage Ukrainian civilian infrastructure and facilities like hospitals with impunity. Disabling or sinking the BSF would’ve ended the war quickly because Putin would’ve likely been ousted and Crimea retaken
@wozzapoet Yes, you are probably right. But what about Musk?? Was he supposed to rot in jail for doing illegal operations in such a sensitive matter?
If Ukraine government asked US government to lift off the ban on starlink operating on the area then MUSK would have been forced to do so.
What more do you want from him?
StarLink is obligated to follow the US sanctions against Russia/Crimea, this includes the satellite comms blackout.
it takes more than a tweet to bypass those protocols in a hot war.
[ex-Aus Gov sat comms technician]
That's an interesting point, thanks for sharing. As always, under the slightest scrutiny these things prove to be far more complex than any section of the media will tell us.
Ukraine is not attacking Russia in any way or capacity. It is self-defence.
Incorrect. You might do it in the form of self-defence but the opposing side will still treat that as an attack.
If Al Qaeda or Iraq attacked USA when they illegally invaded Afghanistan/Iraq, USA would still classify that as an attack (most likely it would be classified as a terrorist attack) - even if they said ‘well we did it in self defence!’
💯%correct!
Driving a remote control bomb into someone else's territory is NOT defence, is the propaganda stronger then your thought process?
@@coolhandluke1503
So it's alright for Russia to do it to Ukraine, but the Ukrainians don't have the right to defend themselves?
Ukraine is a sovereign nation!
@coolhandluke1503 Crimea is internationally recognised Ukrainian territory, which was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014...
If as you say Musk's system does not work in Russia,
and that is even part of US sanctions,
then he was being asked to change that policy.
Put like this, I reckon he was justified in not doing so.
He was asked to break sanctions and US law.
No one would consider it without signed orders from high up at a Whitehouse or Joint Chiefs level, which would take too much time to facilitate the attack.
The attack was poorly planned and had zero hope from the start.
Loving the new “anything goes but in-depth” approach from If You’re Listening
This video should be examined by abc’s media watch
Lol
Why?
@@Replicant-by1eh because the US government restricts the use of starlink in this area.
United States had imposed sanctions on Russia, which Musk says includes Crimea, so the company was not allowed to provide connectivity services to a sanctioned country without the U.S. government approval.
Hey gets to decide because it’s his stuff ?
Exactly. Because he must follow US laws. You cannot ask him to illegally support Ukraine when US gov does not lift off the laws banning starlink on the area.
@@wickedclamor4882 that’s a very good point
that peace plan was reasonable. instead of pushing toward peace, everyday they are dying in the trenches fincheschess
There is nothing 'ominous' about the name 'Russian Black Sea Fleet'. It is exactly the same as 'United States Pacific Fleet'.
Or do you just think the name 'Black Sea' is scary?
He did help Ukraine in the beginning but he didn’t do it for charity. He marketed his satellites to US DOD, remember russians were jamming all signals and nothing worked there, he secured the bag on much larger contracts following this situation.
Now think about this: US provided Ukraine with ~ 24 Patriot systems. They said it’s plenty to cover the whole country. ==> EU countries watching success of the system, Poland orders 400 units . 400 units for Poland which is 30% territory size of Ukraine. And guess who will sell and manufacture these systems.
In the end anything US does to support Ukraine in it’s defense against Russian tyranny will yield more success for US. Wish more folks would understand that.
Sounds like win-win to me.
Yes. Musk is a businessman, and nothing is wrong with that.
Asking Musk to do illegal (bound by US laws) to support Ukraine without orders from the US gov is unreasonable.
@@smkh2890 Win-win for who? The world doesn't just consist of governments and corporations.
This seemed biased, and was missing a lot of important context.
Musk would have turned the Starlink if he was asked by the U.S Government? Why did the request not come from them?
Always great to watch Matt! ABC $ well spent!
Just so you know ABC, everytime you disable comments on your videos I believe the opposite of what you're trying to tell me. I enjoy your content but allowing the discourse especially on the controversial stuff is important for our country.
You might want to examine your reasoning because it isn't sound.
@@pattyofurniture When they disable the comments it's as if theyre just telling you something without allowing contradicting arguments, they might be correct in what theyre saying however removing the discourse removes the possibility to be proven wrong OR correct.
In my opinion this video is some good reporting which reports on both sides of the argument. However there are a lot of videos with comments disabled which just tell you one side of the story that are clearly pushing some idea.
I hope that gives you the information you need about my reasoning, next time you feel like you need to post a comment like that I believe you should ask the questions which give you the answers you're looking for rather than attempting to insult someone, it's not a good look Pattyo
@@drawingofwario9402 the truth doesn't have sides and your news source shouldn't either. You should get your news from multiple sources, you have access to news from all over the world. Strangers on the internet are rarely as knowledgeable as they pretend to be.
I'm trying to help you see the flaw in your reasoning. What you do with that info is none of my business.
you are incorrect. the laws changed under the liberals a couple of years back that make abc (and anyone else posting videos to their own channels) responsible for the comments on the videos. Their moderating team isn't big enough to be 100% across all their videos, so general news stories have comments disabled, but they keep them open on most of the videos from their "in depth" series of videos. It's got nothing to do with what they say in the videos, and everything to do with being responsible for whatever you comment on them. This is the outcome from the law changes they made after the libs got all butt-hurt about things people were saying on social media platforms. abc are just living within those laws now. @@drawingofwario9402
So true, but not just abc, every other Aussie news providers do this. This may be because, they collude with some one and does not want an alternative view, other than what they are telling us, to be discussed.
Actually Western initiated sanctions against corporations operating in Russia stopped Musks system from working in Crimea, and only an exemption could allow Musk to turn it on in Crimea,which he didnt have.
Yes, interesting omission. Also I believe StarLink is not licensed to work in Russia. Elon said: “At the time this happened, the [satellite network in the] region around Crimea, um, was actually turned off. Now the reason it was turned off… actually originally it was because the United States had sanctions against Crimea, and we were not allowed to actually turn on connectivity, without explicit government approval… So, um, basically Ukraine didn’t give us any advanced warning or heads up or anything, we just got the sort of urgent calls from the Ukrainian government saying we needed to turn on Crimea.” while speaking at the All-In Summit. 😅
Than he should have said that instead of saying on twitter that star-link is not for war he’s so full of himself @@av_oid
Crimea is legally part of Ukraine which hilariously completely sinks your argument (like the pun?)😂😂 that said he was aware of starlink about to be used to attack Crimea and didn’t mention a word, so yes, he IS the bad guy here
@@saberint Sadly you don't understand the reality on the ground.
@@Lee-cc9jf sadly you don’t seem to understand the reality on planet earth.
Oh boy, did you like my dismissive put down to not only your dismissive put down, but also to your understanding of international borders.
Now, if you would like to try having a conversation defending the actions of the international arms and gem smuggler known as Elon Musk rather than trying to resort to playground insults be my guest, the TH-cam audience awaits with anticipation
If he gave them access, he would have inadvertently violated US sanctions. Executive order 13685 section 1 (iii) the exportation of services to the Crimea region.
Perhaps the government would have turned a blind eye to this, but I’m certain they’d use that violation as leverage in the future.
No violation. Not Musk's responsibility to police usage. If a soldier uses his mobile phone with google maps to locate a target, it's simply not Musk's responsibility, nor special interest.
@@JoeyBlogs007 Actually Starlink is/can be geo-fenced in a particular region, and it is only available if Govt of that region approves + US does not have sanction. In this case, both were true.
"the exportation of services to the Crimea region". You conveniently ommitted the fact that the sanctions are directed against the RUSSIAN occupiers in Crimea. The "Crimea region" is the Russian occupied Crimea. The US sanctions does not apply to Ukraine, the rightful and legitimate owner of Crimea.
Note also that Russians were using Star link service also.
@@CrazyGaming-ig6qq Yes, Crimea was annexed by Russia and is currently occupied by Russia, hence the sanctions.
This is where this gets murky because Musk gets virtually ALL of his funding from the government and so with Military, National security and such rare issues in mind should comply or get his pork barrel, corporate welfare cut off. These are the kind of issues that can occur when public funds are given with no stipulations or accountability.
NO , he gets very little from government. I don't know where you got that idea but is entirely false. He provides a service (Space X) at a cost, yes but thats a service only.
@@chrisregan4013 Really? How SpaceX survived from bankruptcy back to 2013 after the first attempts failed? The answer is NASA.
Who is the most critical partner of SpaceX? The answer is NASA. Not only where the most money comes from, but also the tech support. NASA means to SpaceX more than money.
Who is NASA?
Nasa gave out contract money not bale out money 💵. And only a small part of the contract money nasa had to give out. And spacex took 75% + of the market. From the other companies the sat on their hands and just sucked money from tax payer.
NASA needs SpaceX, or it can go back to sleep. SpaceX is the service provider, and NASA is the customer.
Exactly the same with Tesla, what he borrowed he gave back, and quickly.
@samztang953
All the current BRAINS of the world want to work for SpaceX first, and Tesla second. This is where they INVENT the technology that other companies BUY to support them.
World largest car company based on market cap fuelled by speculation, Toyota and Volkswagen are far bigger by metrics that matter.
Yea, apparently 'car companies' sell home batteries, phone chargers and build robots like tech companies now.... :D
You are right. Tesla's market is more to information than in car.
I keep hearing from ABC people to PM Trudeau to every other podcasters or xeeter that something is: "repeating Russian propaganda" and yet here's the funny part; I've never once heard those things FROM any Russian sources. I don't know anyone who has.
YET, its said as if we all know that ole' Russian propaganda and Putin talking points and here they are being repeated.
Isn't that strange?
Musk is a gronk. A rich gronk, sure. A gronk none the less.
No
Too much power for one civilian to hold
One person should not have this level of power full stop. A piece of global infrastructure is hard to manage democratically, but it should be done by some kind of organisation that at least TRIES to represent the people of the world.
That’s absolutely absurd. Without incentives for innovation, there would be none .
@@roughhabit9085 We actually have mountains of evidence that the privatisation of science is holding the field as a whole back, between patents, paywalls for research papers, biased research in favour of whatever private corporation is giving a particular group of researchers funding, and other things that get in the way of scientific collaboration.
Also Elon Innovated nothing. He simply took money and power away from the scientists who actually engineered the thing.
Scientific research should be a state funded endeavour.
What do you mean by that statement. So Rupert Murdoch and Zuckerberg, Larry Page, Bezos, Larry Fink and other malevolent creatures of that ilk should not have the power either? Why pick on Musk alone? Your statement and argument seems to lack rigour.
@@roughhabit9085 Not even slightly. It's a national interest consideration.
I agree, Musks power is way out of line. It's a real threat to the US foreign policy and by extent it's democracy, and the US democracy is already shaky in some parts.
Very interesting
Musk's greatest sin was allowing a diversity of opinions on X.
Yep. Soon they'll find something to "cancel" him one way or another.
Awe yeah & when did he do that then?
Wow. What a presentation.
Elon did recently say that, had the white house called him up to turn it on he would have but they never did, I hope you got that quote in.
Elon does a lot of backpedaling, its just reversing the polarity for him!
Elon Musk is a WEF member.
Controlled Opposition.
interesting, because ukraine would have called the US as well. "hey tell that freedom clown to turn the internet back on"
Klaus Schwab wants us implanted with Elon's Neuralink.
And they want us all to be using EVs, E-scooters,E-bikes with selfcombusting batteries.
@@NathanCrouchermusk tears lol cry more
It's a bit weird, It's like someone asking to use your phone or computer to attack Russia.. I'd be like. err... no?
Wtf is this. Making him look like a bond villain with all filters and shit on the thumbnail. Putin is the one whould have stopped it, end of story
Good job elon. Ukrainian need a lesson.
3:40 TOOT TOOT
lol top comment
What about le top righthand cnr ov window's package's? X
Get AI to do it 😂
The owner of the horse, decide how and where the horse go.
You should do a parched crimea one ... if your listening
Yes he should of stopped the war between Ukraine and Russia
No. Next question.
@@MichaelZinczenko Lmao. That's a first. I am a firm believer in Ukraine and that they will persevere over Ruzzia. Elon shouldnt have stopped Ukraine from defending itself (nor should anyone). Slava Ukraini
@@JustALVGuy Sorry, I must have replied to the wrong comment.
Ok, no worries! :D Have a nice day!
@@JustALVGuy Elon didn't stop anything. These simply went out of range. The range bounded by US sanctions. Cry to US gov rather than Musk.
I really like these “Are You Listening” episodes. I think this presenter and the topics are great! Keep em coming please 😊
This is some of that Elon derangement syndrome.
An innovative, well researched and revealing look at the topic yet again. This series really deserves to run on the main ABC tv channel!
Entertaining but academically sound and well presented!
Matt - you are one of the best storytellers in journalism today. Love your work!
😊
If you're listening? Do you listen to yourself? First time seeing this segment or channel. This is a very special kind of special your logic.
NO NO NO and because of that he got Taught a lesson that when it's US interest. You're moral and all the bs* you believe in has to be thrown out the window, or you will get punished.
Why bother elon..
Eukrane didn't ask musk if they could use his public com satellites as military sats. That's not what he made them for. Ukraine's bad. All on them. Musk didn't stop them from attacking Russia, just said can't use my civilian sats. His right totally.
Excellent video, thanks.
Elon Musk-ovite
Who? Arh, that farker!
Elon has little knowledge of the history of Europe and the events that led to the WWII. If he knew the history, he would have noticed some similarities. When Hitler said that he wanted the territories of Czechoslovakia where the German minority lived under the guise of defending their rights, the world agreed, hoping that this would be enough. Hitler then occupied not only these territories, but the whole of Czechoslovakia. Later, he used the economy of Czechoslovakia to strengthen the army and marched on Poland in partnership with Stalin, the world again ignored it.
He again strengthened the army by seizing the raw materials and slave labor of the conquered nation. And so, step by step, he strengthened his war machine. Before he attacked Poland, he did not forget about propaganda. Just before the attack on Poland, he dressed the murdered Poles in German uniforms in Gliwice, proclaiming to all and sundry that the Poles had attacked the Germans and that the Germans in Poland had to be defended. Sound familiar? And it was enough to oppose him on the Czechoslovakia issue at the very beginning, when he was still weak.
Give a bear a finger and he'll take the whole hand
Poorly researched article. No mention at all of the “geo-fencing” of Crimea agreed upon between Musk and Ukrainian government. He also said that we know this sort of attack would not lead to escalation because it has not happened since. Well how was Musk supposed to know at the time. And yes, Crimea has been part of Russia for several hundred years. In fact there was a war in the 18th century called the Crimean War.
Elon seems way too much involved with this conflict.
He says it's because of the nuclear threat, so let's see his stance on Israel-Iran.
He could have just stayed neutral and left Starlink out over the whole country, his system is beyond vital for the Ukrainian war effort and it is denied to the Russian side what he was asked to do was effectively pull the trigger on a major attack to actively facilitate and by so doing participate in it. Ukraine should have done its homework and given him some cover by at least going through government channels by bad-mouthing him they risked losing his system, there is no doubt he doesn't believe in Project Ukraine.
WTF
How do you create a little social media company?
Sell Elon Musk a really big one!
Meh , I don’t think he’s worried. Do you?
He is a Russian propagandist
You are a NATO propagandist
Just recently a whole bus load of people died in Italy.
5 cars spontaneously selfcombusted in Australia.
It's funny. I bet you would have sorted the Iraq war because the media told you so.
How soM
No issue with it whatsoever. If he wants to play demigod with his success, so be it
but when soros does it, its bad
nother brilliant deep dive! thanks!
I’m disappointed this is even a question
We don’t have reliable internet in Australia 🇦🇺, I’m in northern rivers and call’s often don’t work, internet patchy .
So Starlink will be a boon!
I’m in downtown Sydney and it doesn’t work well here either! 😢
Commander Sargent Magor Elon Musk at his own service.
Elon Musk = Space Z
Twitter not X, now called Z
What is the point of this?
it's a joke
Biased nonsense.
ukraine is defending itself
The problem is that the image of one business interferes in the others. I for an instance gave a very hard pass on a Tesla choosing any other brand for my electric car.
In Australia the Starlink will be very useful in the outback. As we have plenty of sun and solar panels, Teslas are popular too!
Just make sure you choose a brand of EV that can use the Tesla chargers, other chargers are slow and often broken....
Make sure you make the same decision when buying other goods and services.
Lmaooo
Lol the desperate attempt to blame elon because he wants peace, 😂
So many warmongers it is very sad to see.
Debauch the currency and plunge the country into war . We’ve seen this movie before.
A couple of things, firstly Starlink is heavily subsidised by the US government and would otherwise be unprofitable. Secondly, this is an example of the importance of critical infrastructure being in the hands of government. Thirdly, whether you agree with Musk's reasoning or not, there is a clear question of legitimacy here. Is it appropriate for a single billionaire to make foreign policy decisions and withhold critical infrastructure from an ally? Are we comfortable outsourcing these sorts of decisions to unelected billionaires?
It’s his Capital, his innovation, his ingenuity. How can government outsource something it doesn’t have the means of producing?
If you failed in an exam because you did not study, will u blame yourself or the examination venue/center? U cannot blame Musk for having control. Blame Ukraine for being so underprepared and yet continuing to fight the war, sending thousands of young men to die for a losing cause.
Blame Ukraine. Are you seriously asking Musk to illegally turn on satellite while the US government does not give permission to Musk??
Musk saved lives this way...good for him
No he didn't, the black sea fleet went on to kill Ukrainian women and children!
Meanwhile, E-scooters, E-bikes, E-cars have selfcombusting batteries, which cannot be extinguished.
Just recently a bus load of people lost their lives in Italy.
Once those batteries selfcombust its impossible to extinguish the fire with the fire extinguishers we presently have.
And, Klaus Schwab wants us all implanted with Elon's Neuralink.
Yes, Ork lives.
Tbf what Elon did wasn't unreasonable. In fact I agree with his actions.
Looney
Complete BS 👎👎👎👎
Lack of thorough planning one again by Ukraine , or nato or American advisors.
Nice English 🤡
At the very least he could have informed Ukraine before he turned out the lights. If he want's to decide who lives or dies on the battlefield, he should run for office and we'll decide.
Nothing was switched off, so Ukraine knew there was no coverage 100%
Zero confusion
He I believe already told them that his company’s service won’t be used for offensive purposes, just defensive. They knew.
Bro. He didn't "turned out the lights". The seababy simply went out of the legal range. US policy that disables Starlink on the area.
Lol. cry baby. But good for content though. But does not make any sense.
The Clash of the Titans. The clash of the will of the state vs the will of the individual. Is this the 21st century version of the " Conscientious Objector". ? I won't allow myself to be used as an instrument of war? Or in Elon Musk's case, all my Starlink satellites? Looks like it....
Klaus Schwab wants us all to be implanted with Elon's Neuralink, and they want us all to be using EVs, E-scooters, E-bikes, which have selfcombusting batteries.
This is about population reduction.
They want a much smaller population.
He was perfectly happy to be an instrument of war until he was required to make an active decision
@@veronicamcghie5238 I think that's the benefit of having agency over yourself or your business, or your satellites. You make the decisions, the choices. There's some things you're willing to do and some lines you won't cross. For whatever reason, Elon Musk was unwilling to cross that line. Fortunately too, we can change our minds about things. What we agreed with last year we might not agree with now.
omg the babbling. seems like only you and your opinions are righteous lol
He took the oath of citizenship and is not a US military general. He should have asked his nations military what they wanted him to do quietly and done it quietly.
AGREE
He’s too old to be drafted.
He did ask but didn't get a green light.
@@wickedclamor4882
If that is what happened then he should publicly state it on a main stream media site.
It seems absurd that he would allow himself to get so much bad publicity if that is what happened.
Where are you sourcing your information from?
@@jasonhamilton9525 Musk had "spoken to the Russian ambassador to the United States... (who) had explicitly told him that a Ukrainian attack on Crimea would lead to a nuclear response," Isaacson wrote.
CBC News
No he Shouldn't have stopped Ukraine
Is this guy fit .. mentally.. surely big pocket .. like putin
yes, Musk did the right thing and he will be remembered in the long run for it positively. I think he should go further and cutoff all starlink services to ukrainian military. But keep supporting starlink services to Ukrainian civilians.
Want to point out something that isn’t obvious.
The minute a civilian spots a military target, and reports it - they instantly become a military target under the rules of engagement, which classifies that person as a spotter. This is standard across all militaries. The fact that the Ukrainian government encouraged civilians to do this is extremely irresponsible regardless of what was happening, as it puts people in an extremely dangerous situation without realising it.
They didn't have a choice. They were flying blind while under attack.
Yes, civilians risked their lives, but they saved many more in doing so, and I'm pretty sure they did it wilfully and with honour.
This is war! A place where their attackers have intentionally bombed hospitals and apartment buildings. What the civilians did was necessary to save their own lives, not just the lives of their soldiers.
If your country was invaded, wouldn't you do the same? I know I would.
depends on who is invading, the russians arnt ww2 versions of german or japan. ukrainieas are dying for massive generational debt and destruction of everything for no real return, there leader should have surrendered. This war is on the US for pushing nato and the euros into russias sphere of influence. I wondered why russia didnt just completely decimate ukraine, i now think its because there will be an after war. putins not silly, an a hole but not silly. @@patrickwalker4159
@@patrickwalker4159 CORRECT ANSWER
@@patrickwalker4159 Depends on the context. Whether u can win the war or not. Ukraine cannot. Its vastly underprepared and only sending 1000s of soldiers to die everyday. Rather they should sign a peace treaty to atleast maintain status quo. Because selfish people like you think about winning and losing wars. Its a game for you, but it is sad and saving lives is most important. When my country was invaded (in which the West sided with the invaders btw due to their selfish motive), that is what we did. Because saving civilian lives is of utmost important. But for people like u war is a football match. Sad.
@hssy2jrocker
Absolute rubbish!
Peace can also be had by Russia's withdrawal from Ukraine, as they were the invaders. They are the selfish ones.
Stop diminishing the weight of Russia's actual responsibility here!
What you said makes absolutely no sense. It is Ukraine's choice to fight against what is a clear violation of international law.
If you prefer to let bullies get away with murder, then that is your choice, but you set the bar very low for someone preaching moral superiority. Your solution is to do nothing so as to save yourself. What's happens when the next bully wishes to take what is not theirs?
Modern international law is certainly not perfect, especially when countries pick and choose which laws suit them, but the ways of ancient or colonial times, when might was right, should not be accepted.
Blame Elon.... he's too easy to blame....bahahahaha. Pretty cheap shot in my books. Ummmmm, does NATO have anything to do with the war actually starting...nooo, no ,no. Of course not......lol
Does Putin?
A country should rely on its own forces in a conflict and not feel entitled for anything, if it can't do so it should adjust its foreigh policy accordingly not to get into conflict.
Rubbish! Ruso agenda!
Perhaps Elon did not want to align himself with neo nzs?
Yet he does on X all the time, and he's proud of it.
that was in the first war not now
He's not a good guy.
Better then you👍
He doesn't have to be good at expense of your benefits.
How convenient for Putin to have Elon's phone number.
Elon's decision would have been my decision, as well.
For the exact same reason.
Well you're not Elon, not in this lifetime or the next. So no one cares.
@@MrRishdog I'm solid.
As long as I'm not you, clown.
LOL. Either way, it's no violation. Not Musk's responsibility to police usage. If a soldier uses his mobile phone with google maps to locate a target, it's simply not Musk's responsibility, nor special interest. Military use of civilian services for their operations is nothing new. It's in fact common place in all wars.
Matt you'd be warmly welcomed at CNN with this opinion piece. Try journalism where facts are the main criteria. Unfortunately your smug bias and cherry picking of accounts is a little too common in our current version of the ABC.
Why is Russia more important to you?
Elon your kicked out of burning man brother