ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
DARTH VADER vs 7 MILLION Evil Mummies - Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2 | UEBS 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.พ. 2024
- DARTH VADER vs 7 MILLION Evil Mummies - Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2 UEBS 2
►Like and Subscribe to my channel for new videos!
#UEBS2 #UltimateEpicBattleSimulator2 #captaincigar #UEBS
Like, Subscribe and Hit Bell Icon for new videos!
ОРУ
I think that there's a bug, Grievous seems to be standing still without hitting back. Only a few of the Grievous appear to be hitting back.
Noticed this too☝️
Request! Yoda is in the temple on mt Olympus guarded by 200k jedi, Vader hires 1m silver knights to reach yoda, & Vader is last up the mountain to fight Yoda 1 on 1!!
i don't suppose there are any Godzilla monsters you could use and have an army fight against it?
Last minutes show how ineffective are the jedi with lightsabers, even in great numbers they do only little dmg to mummies wielding no weapons. When zooming to single unit we see one jedi hitting a few times the same mummy and it still stands. Now multiplying jedis by thousands we have a squad that only takes your computer memory while making almost no effect on the battlefield. Except of creating a sword wall that is hard to penetrate, untill it's outflanked.
By the way, it seems that when a huge attacking army meets much more advanced defenders, their only and most promising strategy is to flank the opponent. If they will not flank, they are slaughtered. If they manage to flank, they usually win, since the defenders reaction to being outflanked is very poor.
My money's on Vader, let's see.
PS, YT has some Hammer Mummy movies for free. Some great stuff!
You chose…poorly
The nuke at the end was cool tho 🤷🏼♂️👍🏻
I don't know why these relax me. They just do...
Classic UBS Jedi blunder. Overextend their lines, then get swamped.
Jedi's always outrun their coverage
So often, the army with no artillery looses ... I hope it isn't the same this time.
Это и называется " бездарное командование", ушёл с выгодных позиций, растянул фронт, угробил армию.
What's with the discrepancy between the starting number of troops on each side and the totals of killed/remaining at the end? What else is causing losses?
Anyway, my strategy criticism of the defenders:
(1.) Were they trying to defend the temple complex at all costs, or engage and destroy the enemy? If the latter they should have been deployed in a far more mobile manner. If the former, they should have made much better use of static defenses. As it was, the majority of defenders could do nothing except wait their turn to get killed; that's a losing strategy against a numerically superior enemy.
(2.) Fighting shoulder to shoulder in a battle line is the worst use for an unarmored duelist. The power of a lightsaber doesn't make much difference if the wielder can be taken out anyway by a face-to-face opponent. Body armor, shields or just plain HP is arguably more important than your + to hit in those circumstances.
(3.) What projectile weapons the defenders did have were largely wasted. If you're defending a static position, channel the attackers and cover those openings with ranged fire from behind the lines. Letting attackers close on your artillery (or equivalent) is incompetent.
Where was Mr. Vader??? Did he flee from the battlefield?
Probably went down during battle, he had 200,000 health though but searching for a single unit in millions is pretty hard.
attack man
history shows, that attack strategy by leaving safe positions against much greater army is usually death sentence for defenders. Saying that attack is the best defence, doesn't always fit :)
falling like flies